UK Approves WikiLeaks Chief Julian Assange’s Extradition to the US

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange faces a dwindling number of options after the UK government approved his extradition to the United States on Friday. The decision is the latest chapter in a prolonged legal battle that started when former military intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning leaked classified government documents about the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, which Assange published on WikiLeaks in 2010.

Fridays decision, approved by UK home secretary Priti Patel, is the latest in a series of legal battles Assange has lost in his effort to remain in the UK. Its a blow to Assange, who has spent the last decade either in hiding in Ecuadors London embassy or in a UK prison. And his increasingly likely prosecution in US courts creates a precarious moment for First Amendment rights and the ability of news outlets to publish material deemed a threat to national security.

This is a dark day for Press freedom and for British democracy, WikiLeaks said in a statement shared on Twitter. Julian did nothing wrong. He has committed no crime and is not a criminal. He is a journalist and a publisher. Wikileaks said Assange intends to appeal.

Assange may have at least one more avenue of appeal, so he may not be on a flight to the United States just yet, Trevor Timm, executive director of the group Freedom of Press, said in a statement. But this is one more troubling development in a case that could upend journalists rights in the 21st century. The charges against Assange include 17 under the Espionage Act and one under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

Fridays ruling overturns a December 2021 decision that declared Assange could not be extradited because subjecting him to US incarceration could increase the risk of suicide. The judge has accepted US assurances that Assange wont face solitary confinement and will have access to psychological treatment.

The UK courts have not found that it would be oppressive, unjust, or an abuse of process to extradite Mr. Assange, a spokesperson for the British Home Office told WIRED. Nor have they found that extradition would be incompatible with his human rights, including his right to a fair trial and to freedom of expression, and that whilst in the US he will be treated appropriately, including in relation to his health.

Assanges legal team has 14 days to appeal, according to the Home Office. His next step, now that the defenses argument based on Assanges suicide risk has been rejected, would likely be to focus on the other arguments his team has made against extradition, such as the threat it poses to press freedom and the political bias against Assange from United States law enforcement, given that Assange has been a thorn in the side of the US executive branch for over a decade.

I think theres a lot of roads to run here, says Naomi Colvin, UK/ Ireland director at the advocacy group Blueprint for Free Speech. She points out that even if these additional arguments fail to sway the UK judicial system, Assange can also appeal to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France, arguing that extradition would violate the UKs commitment to human rights treaties. In yet another option, Assanges team could demand a judicial review that would challenge the political side of Patels decision specifically, Colvin adds.

See the original post here:
UK Approves WikiLeaks Chief Julian Assange's Extradition to the US