Robotic Human-Like Inspection Unit Has AI-Based Machine Learning Capabilities – Packaging Strategies

Robotic Human-Like Inspection Unit Has AI-Based Machine Learning Capabilities | 2020-07-28 | Packaging Strategies This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more. This Website Uses CookiesBy closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.

Read the original:
Robotic Human-Like Inspection Unit Has AI-Based Machine Learning Capabilities - Packaging Strategies

Former Hedge Fund Billionaire Makes The Case For $20,000 Bitcoin Price By The End Of 2020 – Forbes

Bitcoin has rocketed higher over the last few days, breaking months of inaction and sparking excitement among bitcoin investors.

The bitcoin price, still about half its all-time high set in late 2017, rallied almost 20% in less than a weekpeaking at just over $11,400 per bitcoin on Monday evening before falling back.

Now, former hedge fund billionaire-turned crypto investor, Michael Novogratz, has said he expects the bitcoin price to hit $20,000 by the end of the yearfueled by a global "liquidity pump" and an influx of retail investors.

Michael Novogratz, a Wall Street veteran, has become one of bitcoin and cryptocurrency's richest ... [+] investors in recent years, making a name for himself as a bitcoin bull.

"The liquidity story isn't going to go away. We're going to get a big stimulus," Novogratz, the founder and chief executive of bitcoin and crypto merchant bank Galaxy Digital, told CNBC, adding, "it doesn't look like the Federal Reserve is going to raise rates."

U.S. Republican lawmakers unveiled plans for a $1 trillion stimulus package on Monday that includes another round of $1,200 payments and additional funds for small-business loans. However, U.S. investors sent stocks lower as markets braced for a prolonged period of negotiation between Democrats and Republicans.

Meanwhile, the gold price, which Novogratz also sees climbing in coming months, lost momentum after coming within touching distance of $2,000 for the first time.

"Yesterday, you saw a lot of money shift back over to gold and bitcoin," Novogratz said, pointing to "a lot of retail interest in [bitcoin]."

Retail traders switching from stocks to bitcoin amid fresh government stimulus could send the bitcoin price to $14,000 within the next three months and as high as $20,000 by the end of the year, according to Novogratz.

Novogratz also said he's beginning to see institutional investors move into bitcoin but warned Wall Street investors may face a learning curve compared to gold.

"Gold has been around for 3,000 years. It's pretty easy to buy," he said. "There's an adoption game in bitcoin that you don't have in gold."

The bitcoin price broke months of stagnation over the last few days, soaring above $11,000 per ... [+] bitcoin for the first time this year.

Novogratz's prediction is somewhat supported by reports coming out of bitcoin and cryptocurrency exchanges.

"As bitcoin and other digital currencies are easier to access than ever before, were seeing a surge in bitcoin interest as the market anticipates that second stimulus bill," Catherine Coley, CEO of BinanceUS, said via email.

BinanceUS saw bitcoin trading volumes hit an all-time high on its platform as the price surged on Monday, according to Coley.

However, despite the latest bitcoin price surge, the bitcoin options market is signalling just an 8.5% probability of bitcoin at over $20,000 at the end of the year, data from crypto derivatives analytics firm Skew showed, up from 7% on Monday morning.

Read this article:
Former Hedge Fund Billionaire Makes The Case For $20,000 Bitcoin Price By The End Of 2020 - Forbes

Bitcoin price today: Why does it keep going up? – Fast Company

Bitcoin is on a surge . . . and no one knows why. The digital currency is up over 17% since July 20, the same period during which the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped nearly 2% and reported cases of COVID-19 topped 4.3 million in the United States. As of this afternoon, the price was nearly $11,000.

The spike comes on the heels of a decision by the Office of the Comptroller of Currency last week allowing banks to hold cryptocurrencies. Up to now, banks and funds had avoided bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies due to regulatory concernsthough banks likely have not yet had time to react, and bitcoins current upswing started before that decision.

The rally could be related to the overwhelming uncertainty of the stock market, leaving people looking for a safe-haven alternative to cash and stocks. Gold prices have also been on the rise, and some suggest that perhaps bitcoin is the gold of the tech age. But pandemic uncertainty has ruled over the stock market for months now, and cryptocurrencies are often more volatile than other markets and prone to unpredictable rallies.

Two prominent Wall Street veterans are predicting that this is just the beginning of an even bigger rise that will see bitcoin more than double. Stay tuned.

Read this article:
Bitcoin price today: Why does it keep going up? - Fast Company

The truth about ‘anti-conservative bias’ at Facebook and Twitter – Mashable

When the CEOs of Big Tech testify in Congress on Wednesday, theyll almost certainly be hit with a dubious and regular Republican talking point: censorship of conservative voices on social media.

President Donald Trump and other politicians and pundits on the right love to complain that social media companies censor conservatives. There is no evidence that's true. In fact, conservative news thrives on Facebook. Of Trumps thousands of lies, Twitter had the audacity to lightly fact-check him three times.

During the hearing before the House Antitrust Subcommittee, Apples Tim Cook, Amazons Jeff Bezos, Facebooks Mark Zuckerberg, and Googles Sundar Pichai will try to convince lawmakers their corporate behemoths arent monopolies. These companies absolutely need to be interrogated about their unprecedented wealth and power. But, thanks partly to the flow of dark money, Republicans have hijacked the conversation to push the narrative that they are the real victims in all of this.

Mashable spoke to experts about the history, facts, and potential consequences of the GOP's "bias" claims. Heres what you need to know.

From 2016 to the present, Republicans have seized on anecdotes to claim Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Google intentionally moderate content in a way that unfairly impacts conservatives. They have claimed that these companies remove or down-rank (or shadow ban) conservative content and profiles because "elite Silicon Valley" companies are supposedly liberal. GOP senators even had a hearing dedicated to the issue, and Sen. Josh Hawley has introduced legislation that would require companies to prove they are politically neutral.

"[T]he only people who have been in a position to call bullshit on this, the tech companies, are too terrified to say no..."

Tech companies aren't good at defending against these arguments at least without trying to appease right-wingers in the process. They dont want to piss off the people in charge of regulating and taxing them, and would prefer to avoid alienating high-profile users like Trump, and his followers, who drive engagement (and profits). When presented with cases of bias, in some cases, the companies backtracked even when the content did violate some company policies. Giving in just reinforced the idea that bias existed in the first place.

Every one of these things reinforces the next, and at every step of the way, the only people who have been in a position to call bullshit on this, the tech companies, are too terrified to say no, so the story just keeps growing, Berin Szka, the president of the non-profit, non-partisan technology think tank TechFreedom, said.

Proving bias is more complicated than pointing to several instances of someones post or profile being removed, and concluding theres something larger at work. The problem is its difficult to prove a negative.

Kathleen Hall Jamieson, the director of FactCheck.org, explained that to truly assess bias, you have to establish a data set (i.e., pieces of content), find comparable content on the left and the right, and then see if they were treated the same. This has to be done multiple times. Jamieson and other scholars have successfully conducted these analyses on print media and cable news, and found there is generally bias on both sides, although not one overwhelming "liberal media" bias.

Doing the same for social media, however, is a different story. There is simply too much data. And these social networks aren't necessarily open to outside researchers poking under the hood. There are privacy concerns, and it could jeopardize company secrets.

From a methodological standpoint, its virtually impossible to do, Jamieson said. You'll never capture the full base of the content in order to start your analysis.

Because of those challenges, Jamieson explained that people claiming bias then move to argument by anecdote," like when Ted Cruz complained about conservative bloggers Diamond & Silk being temporarily banned by Facebook. It made headlines, but one case does not prove that something systemic is at work.

In the absence of actual data, some conservatives have tried to create the appearance of empirical evidence. Politicians point to a 2016 Gizmodo story that showed how Facebook used human moderators not automated systems, as it claimed to populate its trending news tab as evidence of anti-conservative bias (helped by the articles inflammatory headline).

Then last year, the Trump campaign solicited complaints of social media censorship, but that was basically just a way to get voter emails and donations. A Columbia research fellow did his own analysis on high-profile figures banned by Twitter, and found they were mostly Trump supporters. Many of them David Duke and Richard Spencer, just to name two also happened to be white supremacists spreading hate speech.

That's related to another issue: people on the right may in fact experience more content moderation than people on the left because right-leaning ideologies and content overlap with behavior thats not allowed on social networks. For example, Twitter started expanding and enforcing its policies against hate speech, and, surprise, surprise, they applied to Trump's dog-whistle politics. Since Russian trolls successfully manipulated the 2016 election with inflammatory rhetoric and fake news alike, Facebook has been working to de-emphasize conspiracy theories and incendiary content from disreputable sources, which most often comes from right-wing sites like Gateway Pundit.

These people are not entirely wrong when they claim there might be some disparate effect when Facebook changes its algorithm to handle sites that use clickbaity headlines, or post conspiracy theories, or rely on bots to promote their content, Szka said.

Despite these instances of moderation, conservative content the more sensationalist the better actually thrives on social media networks, especially Facebook. Ben Shapiro and Breitbart consistently rank as top voices on Facebook.

Some conservatives have attempted to take internet companies to court. That hasnt worked out so well. In one lawsuit against Google, and another against Twitter and others, federal judges decided in both cases that tech companies arent violating First Amendment rights when they make content moderation decisions, because the First Amendment protects citizens from the government dictating the parameters of their speech, not private companies.

The term liberal media did not arise organically. Since the 1960s, conservative politicians have sought to discredit criticism from the press by calling them unfair or biased. In the 1970s, Richard Nixon accused the press of conducting a witch hunt (sound familiar?) as reporters pursued Watergate. Once Rush Limbaugh hit the airwaves in the 1980s, he argued that the press was not the actual arbiter of the truth he was. Fox News shifted its tone at the time to echo Limbaugh, and the rest is history.

Conservatives, who normally would not seek to regulate or dictate the policies of a private company, found a new target in social media and internet companies, too.

"It's an old argument that is being revivified and applied to something that you would not ordinarily call news, Jamieson said. Ordinarily you would expect a conservative to say the platforms are privately owned companies, they can do whatever they want. It is a little odd to hear conservatives argue that a privately owned company should have constraints placed on it."

Some conservatives are ready to join the fight against internet companies because decades of animosity with the press have entrenched the idea of liberal bias as a problem. Making these accusations also plays well with conservative voters, as does taking CEOs to task for bias in front of Congress.

It plays well when you run in an election, Ashkhen Kazaryan, TechFreedoms director of civil liberties, said. A crucial player in that ecosystem is Sen. Josh Hawley. When he ran for senator, one of his big things was that he 'took on Google.' He was one of the first who proved that its very successful messaging, especially when it comes to conservatives.

Experts say another reason conservatives engage in these arguments is to work the refs. That is, if they accuse the people in charge of moderating content of bias loudly enough, moderators might be disinclined to do so again in the future to avoid looking biased. Conservatives have a huge incentive to keep social media companies from moderating untrue or bigoted posts, since the narratives created by Trump allies such as Ben Shapiro and Tucker Carlson spread so effectively online and helped Trump and Republicans rise to power.

"Attacking somebody for being biased is effective if you can get them to change their behavior in a way that benefits you, Jamieson said. There's a tactical reason to attack the platforms for bias if you increase the likelihood that they're going to let you get away with things as a result because they're trying so hard not to be biased."

The strategy appears to be working.

Social media platforms have differed in their responses to claims of anti-conservative bias. Twitter has stood by its efforts to introduce conversational health measures, despite complaints about shadow banning, and has been more aggressively going after hate speech and conspiracy theories. It also appended fact-checking or warning labels to three of Trumps recent tweets.

Facebook, on the other hand, declined to act on the same Trump statements. The platform has largely bent over backwards to appease Republican complaints. In 2018, it hired a former Republican senator to do an audit of bias on the site. The report accused non-partisan, neutral fact checkers of liberal bias," and resulted in policy changes that allowed for more graphic anti-abortion ads

It has also appointed an organization affiliated with Tucker Carlsons ultra-right wing website the Daily Caller as a fact checking partner, despite the Daily Callers status as a routine peddler of misinformation. That appointment, and the audit, result in more than just lip service to conservatives: it undermines fact-checkers and the nature of truth and accountability itself.

"When the fact-checking group holds you accountable as a candidate, your voting constituency can say, 'Well I don't believe that, because I don't believe any fact checkers, they're all liberal,'" Jamieson said. So tactically what's the effect of being able to discredit fact-checkers? It minimizes your accountability.

There is a lot at stake for these social media companies. Trump took out his anger at Twitter by, well, tweeting. He also crafted an executive order that asked the Federal Communications Commission to rewrite a portion of the Communications Decency Act, Section 230, that shields social media companies from liability.

Section 230 is a cornerstone for the internet that actually protects freedom of speech, because it allows social media companies to host forums or other publishing tools for people without being liable for what users say. Amending Section 230 would not only change the internet, but could open the door for reinterpretations of the First Amendment.

The First Amendment and Section 230 protect free speech in our democracy as we know it, Kazaryan said. Messing with them based on knee-jerk reactions and feelings about how these companies conduct their business could be extremely damaging to democracy.

Jamiesons research has shown that bias, on both sides, is part of human nature. However, these bad faith arguments, made to work the refs, could have consequences that echo far beyond the internet.

Link:

The truth about 'anti-conservative bias' at Facebook and Twitter - Mashable

Bitcoin Could Hit All-Time High Levels By 2021, Trader Says – Forbes

Bitcoin saw a dramatic price rise on July 27, shooting from below $10,000, all the way up to ... [+] $11,400, all in a 24-hour span.

Bitcoin (BTC) has had a wild year. The asset dropped from $10,500 to $3,860, before flying up past $11,000, all since February. Given the overall mainstream U.S. market environment, as well as the price action seen in the crypto space, one trader sees all-time high ranges by 2021.

With gold nearing a new all-time high, and equity asset prices getting more expensive, I believe the market is anticipating inflation and a weaker dollar, cryptopodcaster and traderBrian Krogsgard, also known as Ledger Status on Twitter, told me in a July 22 message. I struggle to see the downside for bitcoin in such an environment, he added.

I don't know how far the market could go, but I anticipate bitcoin will challenge prior highs in 2021.

Since Krogsgards comment, Gold broke its all-time high near $1,830, according to Trading Economics, sitting a press time price of $1,942. U.S. stock markets have also seen booming prices, all amid contrasting high unemployment numbers after months of Covid-19 prevention measures.

[Ed note: Investing in cryptocoins or tokens is highly speculative and the market is largely unregulated. Anyone considering it should be prepared to lose their entire investment.]

Bitcoin Breaks Long-Time Resistance

Over the past ten months or so, bitcoin has struggled to break past a price level near $10,540, as per TradingView.com data. Since October 2019, the asset travelled up to price zones between $10,430 and $10,540 on three separate occasions each months apart. Each time bitcoin gathered enough momentum to make an attempt at breaking that price zone, the asset faced selling pressure, unable to rally past the level. Falling prices followed each effort.

Bitcoin finally rocketed past $10,540 on July 27, however, rising from $9,940, all the way up to $11,400, all in a 24-hour span. The asset now sits at $11,032 at press time. According to Krogsgard, $10,200 held as a significant level in the assets journey. We blasted through an important level at $10,200 a previous weekly high, he told me in a message on July 27.

Breaching several areas of clear resistance forced stop market buys and forced sellers out, causing rapid expansion all the way to the next key weekly around $11,400, he added, referring to market dynamics spurring the move.

Mental Level Broken As Mainstream Hype Stirs

Crypto trader and Brave New Coin (BNC) analyst Josh Olszewicz, known as CarpeNoctom onTwitter, also weighed in on the BTC scene, noting $10,000 as a notable price point. Five digits (10k) was a big psychological resistance barrier for price, so once that was crossed, much easier to go higher, Olszewicz told me in a July 27 message.

We also had some legacy people excited about the BTC price chart, Olszewicz said, noting mainstream entities interacting with the action. CNBC pitted the digital asset against gold as a store of value a concept the crypto industry has boasted for years now.

Olszewicz pointed toward a bevy of economic factors around bitcoins price movement, including mass money printing activities across the world, golds position in unexplored price territory past its all-time high and the U.S. dollars decreasing value against other world currencies, with BTC catching up.

The trader also mentioned other impactful events, including European Union Covid-19 spending and crypto-based decentralized finance (DeFi) hype.

Some parties still refuse bitcoin as a valid asset, however. Gold bug and financial commentator Peter Schiff has made a number of comments against the asset over the years, including a July 26 interview with Morgan Creek Digital cofounder Anthony Pompliano, in which Schiff said bitcoin has no commodity properties, as opposed to gold.

Disclaimer: I actively trade cryptocurrencies, as well as hold a small amount of BTC, ETH, LTC, XMR, NEO, ZEC, BEAM, BCH, DASH, LINK, XTZ andvarious insignificant other altcoin positions.

Continue reading here:
Bitcoin Could Hit All-Time High Levels By 2021, Trader Says - Forbes

This is the ‘type of action’ bitcoin bulls like to see, Oppenheimer says – CNBC

Gold and digital gold are rallying side by side.

Prices of gold hit another record high Tuesday, touching $1,974 earlier in the day and adding to an 8% rally this month. Cryptocurrency bitcoin, meanwhile, held above $10,900 and is up nearly 20% so far in July.

Ari Wald, head of technical analysis at Oppenheimer, said gold still looks good after its run-up.

"We've been recommending gold as a way to play the expansion of the [Federal Reserve's] balance sheet. It's actually the high momentum commodity, it ranks highest above all commodities out there in terms of momentum," Wald said Monday on CNBC's "Trading Nation."

However, he adds, "We do recommend sticking with it but I think it's worthwhile to highlight bitcoin instead which isn't as extended."

Wald notes that its recent breakout is setting up more gains ahead.

"Bitcoin is reversing its downtrend dating back to its 2017 peak. If you are a long-term holder, this is the type of action you'd like to see," he said.

Bitcoin remains well below its December 2017 peak of nearly $20,000.

Michael Binger, president of Gradient Investments, is still in the gold over bitcoin camp.

"Between the two I would really lean on the gold side here. When you think about it, it is really a Goldilocks environment for gold investors right now. I mean, you have a weak U.S. dollar, you have negative real interest rates. All of this is based on the prospect of rising inflation," Binger said during the same segment.

Binger agrees with Wald that bitcoin is a momentum play, but adds that it is not a "valid currency yet."

Both are up on the year. Bitcoin has rallied 53% in 2020 and gold has added 28%.

Disclaimer

Read the original post:
This is the 'type of action' bitcoin bulls like to see, Oppenheimer says - CNBC

Bitcoin price hits $11000, raising possibility of multi-year bull run – Verdict

The price of Bitcoin passed $11,000 on Monday, the highest it has reached in almost a year, and according to experts, there are more gains to come.

Reaching $1,268.19, a one-day rise of 12.73%, the Bitcoin price has now dropped slightly to $11,041.50 at the time of writing.

It follows the much anticipated Bitcoin halving event it May, where the amount generated from mining work was cut by half. However, the halving is unlikely to be the sole cause.

Bitcoin has followed a similar cycle for many years, [and] many believe this is the start of the next multi-year bull market, says Richard Simpson, chief business development officer at tap Global.

The halving event in May reduced the daily new supply by half. A more short-term general rotation away from Alt coins and into BTC provided the fuel for the short-term spike.

For many experts, this surge has been long expected.

The break-out has been long coming, after months of bumbling along in mid $9,000s, for Bitcoin investors, has been akin to watching paint dry, explains Katharine Wooller, managing director, Dacxi, UK and Eire.

In particular, cryptocurrency has seen greater institutional support than ever before, which has undoubtedly helped the rising price.

It has been a phenomenal year so far for crypto, building upwards pressure from unrelentingly good news; for example; Paypals announcement they will provide crypto services to their 325 million users, solid progress on Eth 2.0, and in the US the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency softening their position on crypto, says Wooller.

However, despite the surging Bitcoin price, there is reason for caution.

Bitcoinhas been a beneficiary of increased adoption and more acceptance on the regulatory side, particularly out of the US. At the same time, while recent gains have been impressive, withBitcoinpushing back above $10k, its important to recognise where were at technically and fundamentally, says Joel Kruger, currency strategist at LMAX Group.

Bitcoinis now overextended against the US Dollar, into a critical resistance zone ahead of its 2019 high. This comes at a time when the global outlook is increasingly uncertain and the prospect for another big downturn in stocks, much like was seen back in March, is very real.

Get the Verdict weekly email

For some, the economic uncertainty is set to spark further growth in Bitcoin, as investors increasingly look to the cryptoasset as a safe haven from more exposed investments.

Bitcoin is currently realising its reputation as a form of digital gold. Up to now, gold has been known as the ultimate safe-haven asset, but Bitcoin which shares its key characteristics of being a store of value and scarcity could potentially knock gold from its long-held position in the future as the world becomes ever-more tech-driven, says Nigel Green, CEO of deVere Group.

Geopolitical issues, such as the US-China spat, will prompt many savvy investors to increase exposure to decentralised, non-sovereign, secure digital currencies, including Bitcoin, to shield them from the turbulence taking place in traditional markets.

This is a view echoed by Dacxis Wooller, who also sees comparisons to the 2017 Bitcoin market, shortly before its all-time-high surge.

As we get a real sense of just how bad the post-coronavirus economic reality looks, I expect to see retail and institutional investor alike jumping ship from traditional assets to reputable crypto, she says.

Certainly, recent announcements from the likes of JPMorgan and Standard Chartered suggest institutional interest in crypto is no passing fad.

But while many see the economic situation potentially buoying Bitcoin, others believe it could pose a risk to the cryptocurrencys price.

Our view is that we still believe the markets are pulled on the one hand by the inflation hedge story driving Bitcoin higher while at the same time the global economy is suffering a massive demand shock with the potential to drive Bitcoin lower, says Gavin Smith, CEO of Panxora.

However, the general sense is that there is a change in the wind, with a bull market rising to dominate over the coming months and potentially years.

Short term, we could continue pushing higher quickly, or just as easily pull back to recent support, either scenario can be bullish. But really its anyones guess, says tap Globals Simpson.

Medium term, many well-regarded models point to this being the start of a multi-year bull run, possibly concluding in around 18 months. Long term Bitcoin has and probably will continue to outperform every other asset class.

The surge has now led some to predict Bitcoin could climb as high at $20,000 by the end of the year, although not all agree with this sentiment.

Simpson, for example believes that while we certainly could see it hitting these giddy heights in 2020, we could easily not.

I would probably guess at highs this year below $20k, but with something much higher at some point next year, he says.

This perception is echoed by Panxoras Smith, who sees 2020 has still having high volatility with a year-end of around $7,000, with a drive higher to new highs in 2021.

We also believe that the inflation story will drive the longer-term dynamic for Bitcoin, so wouldnt short this market, even while we believe there will be a short-term washout this year before the true rally takes hold, he adds.

However, while LMAX Groups Kruger also sees volatility being present, he sees a higher 2020 peak than Smith.

We dont believe Bitcoin is ready just yet to be fully appreciated as a store of value asset, which means that in the short term, Bitcoin will still be exposed to periods of risk off in traditional markets, he says.

At the same time, we believe any setbacks will continue to be very well supported on dips, with medium and longer-term players happy to step in and build exposure in anticipation of Bitcoin realising its potential as a store of value asset.

This could set the stage for another healthy pullback over the coming months, before Bitcoin is bid back up and looks to close out the year on a strong note with a push towards $20k.

For Wooller and many others meanwhile, all metaphorical bets are off.

Personally, I am cautiously optimistic. 2020 has been a wrecking ball to economic theory we have no precedent for a global pandemic in modern times and are thus are in unchartered territory, says Wooller.

At a very basic level, Bitcoin has never been harder to extract, and the total addressable market is ever growing. Nothing is impossible in crypto it adapts and advances at breakneck speed the industry sometimes feels like has its own time zone; and a bit like converting dog years, that a month in crypto is a like a year in any other.

I have a sneaking suspicion that 2020 will be year that Bitcoin, as a concept, is validated.

Read more: Bitcoin can protect investors against inflation

Go here to read the rest:
Bitcoin price hits $11000, raising possibility of multi-year bull run - Verdict

The ‘magic”of open source: better, faster, cheaper — and trustworthy – GCN.com

The 'magic'of open source: better, faster, cheaper -- and trustworthy

Although open-source software has been available for decades, governments at all levels are seeing the benefits of embracing it to better deliver services to the public, a new report states.

Those benefits include improving efficiency, lowering costs, improving trust, increasing transparency and reducing vendor lock-in, according to Building and Reusing Open Source Tools for Government, released this month by think tank New America. Whats more, open source allows for collaboration so that government entities with common problems dont have to reinvent the wheel to solve them.

For instance, the United Kingdoms Government Digital Services Notify communications management platform is available as open source, and the government of Canada adapted it last year to fit its own needs, such as modifying it to support multiple languages, the report states.

In California, the Government Operations Agency tasked a team to rethink how residents access information online. One of the 20-odd prototypes developed was used by another team to stand up an unemployment insurance application within Covid19.ca.gov, a website created to provide pandemic information, said Angelica Quirarte, assistant secretary at the agency, during a July 14 New America webinar.

Open source collaboration is a learning experience that allows both authors and contributors to exchange ideas about how each developer might solve a specific problem, the report stated.Collaborators can use open source work as a starting point in solving their own versions of similar problems, saving valuable time and growing the original base of work.

The report defines open source code as chunks of code that are available online for anyone to use. Its released with licenses that outline how the code may be used, such as with attribution to the original authors, or for non-commercial purposes only. The code itself is free to use, but there are associated costs, such as a server infrastructure and information technology staff to run and monitor it.

For example, Laura Kogler, engineering director at Code for America, said during the webinar that ClientComm, an open source tool that a CfA brigade built to help probation officers communicate with people on probation or parole, was adopted by only one agency. Feedback on the app from criminal justice agencies showed many departments lacked the technical ability to run the software.

Another stumbling block to using open source is being able to find the tools in the first place, said Mark Lerner, a report author and fellow in New Americas Digital Impact and Governance Initiative and Public Interest Technology Program. To support open source solutions for COVID response, the organization created, in collaboration with California and U.S. Digital Response, the Pandemic Response Repository, a GitHub website that collects all the open source tools built, run or maintained by government for responding to COVID.

Data security is another challenge to open-source solutions, according to the report, but the key is publishing the code, not the data associated with it, Quirarte said. By keeping secrets and user data out of your source code, you easily and drastically reduce any risk of data exposure when using open source software, the report added.

The government has five main paths to using open source, according to the report. The first is working in the open, in which new software is developed to address an unmet need. Second is migrating a solution into the open, or reviewing and refactoring code from existing solutions to make the software more secure, understandable and useful. Third, governments can adapt an open source solution to their needs, as Canada did with Notify. The final two paths are to use open source as-is and to use a mix of open source and proprietary software.

Bottom line: Its not about the technology. Its about delivering for people, said Robin Carnahan, a fellow at Georgetown Universitys Beeck Center for Social Impact and Innovation. And if open source and these other kind of tools help you deliver better, faster and cheaper for people, then its going to build trust. Thats the magic.

About the Author

Stephanie Kanowitz is a freelance writer based in northern Virginia.

Read this article:
The 'magic''of open source: better, faster, cheaper -- and trustworthy - GCN.com

Ethereums First ICO Blazes Trail To A World Without Bosses – Forbes

Augur co-founders Jeremy Gardner (second-from left) and Joey Krug (second from right) gather with ... [+] their founding team.

If it wasnt for horses, Joey Krug might not have ever gotten into ethereum. Growing up in the small farming town of Knoxville, Illinois, he and his younger brother used to ride their bikes through fields of corn and soybeans looking for trouble. One day, when he was about 9 years old, Krug came across the farm of a local school teacher, who raised and rode horses. He instantly fell in love with the powerful creatures, and peddled home as fast as he could to ask his parents for one.

Perhaps not realizing the entrepreneurial spirit already growing in their son, they offered him a deal. They said No, but if you go there and you muck stalls every day for a year, we'll get you a horse, he says. I think they assumed there was no way I was going to do that. But I did. I went there every day, mucked stalls, brushed the horses. And so they finally got me this pink horse, a quarter horse, named Shimmer.

When not riding horses, the young boy excelled on his familys computer, figuring out ways to hack it so it would turn on in the wrong order and get stuck trying to permanently boot-up the CD-ROM. By the time he enrolled in an eighth grade beginners computer course it took him only 15 minutes to do 45 minutes worth of work. Instead of going home, the 12 year-old Krug deposited $20 of birthday money into an off-shore book, and placed a bet.

Not only did the bet win him $20, jumpstarting more sophisticated models tracking race distance, jockey, and track conditions in a spreadsheet, but it merged his love of horses with computers. Now 26-years-old, Krug is the co-chief investment officer at Pantera Capital, and the co-founder of Augur, an open source no-limits betting platform built on the ethereum blockchain that lets anyone build any kind of betting market, without a bookie.

Today, Krug and a team of open-source developers scattered around the world launched version two of that platform, which amounts to a significant leap forward in the world of decentralized applications that function similar to the internet, but without the need of trusted third-parties. If successful, the profound upgrades could be used to more than just place horse-bets without a bookie, but mark a turning point in the next generation of the internet.

When you think about centralized power, it kind of always corrupts, says Krug, 26, who might in other circumstances have the CEO title, if not for the unusual nature of the project he co-founded. Somehow, somebody takes too much power, and they do something they shouldn't. And if you think about regular businesses, too, they have the same incentive, to make as much money as possible. And so Auger is very different. It's sort of like public infrastructure.

Augur co-creator Joey Krug on Shimmer, the Palomino horse his parents got him after mucking horse ... [+] stalls for a year.

Born in July 1995, Krug grew up surrounded by farms, but his family werent farmers. His mom was a physicians assistant and his dad an ER doctor. During his Freshman year of college he discovered bitcoin on Overclock.net, a forum dedicated to expanding computer processing power. Shortly thereafter, Krug read retired U.S. congressman Ron Pauls, The Case For Gold, and was struck by how irresponsible bureaucracy led to a U.S. debt of more than $10 trillion dollars at the time.

After hearing further stories from his parents about how another bureaucracy, around the U.S. healthcare system, had deprived them of the joy they once felt helping others, Krug briefly enrolled in Pomona College, based in Claremont, California, with a double focus on computer science and pre-med, hoping he could streamline the process. Fate would have it though, that hed get permanently derailed by blockchain. Though his goal of fixing broken bureaucracy never wavered.

After founding a bitcoin club at school, Krug built a bitcoin point-of-sale app and went door to door to try to convince local Claremont businesses to accept the cryptocurrency. Unable to find customers, he moved to San Francisco in search of another way forward. At around this time a team of researchers at Princeton published an influential paper on creating decentralized prediction markets, or distributed autonomous organizations (DAOs), where betting is used as an incentive to create valuable data about the future. Unlike brash predictions carelessly made around the internet without repercussions, these predictions would have monetary repercussions, but no bookies, or any other middlemen to oversee them.

It's interesting from a wide range of aspects, says Krug, reminiscing about the paper, which also influenced ethereum inventor Vitalik Buterin, now 26. All the way from my horse-betting days to a real world informational standpoint, you can get data about the real world that you wouldn't necessarily have without it.

Initially, Krug joined forces with college friend Jeremy Gardner, now 28, and Jack Peterson, now 37, to build their own implementation of a project that had been circling around the cryptocurrency community, called TruthCoin, that used a modified version of the bitcoin blockchain to incentivize making accurate predictions. Buterin caught wind of the project and approached Krug, explaining that he was in the final stages of launching ethereum, a blockchain similar to bitcoin, but with a computer language that would make it much easier to write more elaborate instructions, called smart contracts, to directly connect bettors to each other.

To pay for all this, over a 45-day period in the fall of 2015, Augur ran the first-ever initial coin offering (ICO), in which tokens were issued on the ethereum blockchain. The privately-held Forecast Foundation, based in Estonia, sold or distributed 11,000 REP tokens to be used on Augur, 80% of which went to the crowd, or people interested in participating in the prediction market, 16% of which went to the Augur founding team, including Buterin, and 4% of which went to support the foundation itself. A total of about $5.2 million was raised for the development of the platform by selling more than one million ether tokens and 12,000 bitcoins used to pay for the tokens. At the current rates those tokens would be worth nearly a half-billion dollars.

But this was the very earliest days of what would come to be known as the ICO craze. Not only were the terms of the ICO more generous than many later capital raises using blockchain, but the founders objective was more philosophically aligned with the principles of decentralization inherent in blockchain. Just two years later an Augur competitor, Gnosis, raised more than twice what Augur did ($12 million) by selling a fraction of the tokens (5% instead of 80%), in a mere 15 minutes. That left the Gnosis team with 95% percent of the tokens, then valued at nearly $300 million, making them independently wealthy with little more than a white paper describing their idea. Between then and October 2018 more than $20 billion was raised in ICOs according to news site Coindesks tracker, before the bubble burst amid regulatory uncertainty around whether or not these tokens qualified as securities.

While REP tokens are able to accumulate and lose value, similar to securities, and are currently worth $20.90 each, for a total liquid market value of $230 million, according to data site Messari, they are unlike securities in that they are crucial for the proper functioning of the prediction market, giving them the unofficial status of utility tokens. So-called reporters in the Augur ecosystem are required to stake their REP (short for reputation) tokens while they are helping determine the outcome of an event. If the reporter reports in consensus with others, they receivea small portion of the protocols fees and their REP remains intact. A reporter can dispute the system 21 times, with their required stake doubling each time, before a fork, or copy, of Augur is automatically created and essentially two different versions of the truth exist.

Ultimately truth is going to be a public consensus that ends up being determined in the long run by which world does it appear that people want to live? says Forecast Foundation operations director Tom Kyser. And presumably that world is going to be the one that the general public and consensus believes accurately reflects reality.

In the early days of the build, a team of independent and paid coders from around the world worked largely under the management of Augur co-founder Jack Peterson, a biophysicist with a Ph.D from the University of California. After initially laying much of the groundwork for the code, Krug was selected to be a Peter Thiel fellow in June 2016 and the following year joined as the co-chief investor at cryptocurrency and blockchain investor Pantera Capital, which has approximately $500 million in assets under management.

The month after Krug joined Pantera, on July 9, 2018, the first version of Augur was launched, a very slow, expensive, difficult to use version, according to Krug. But one that showed that a gambling platform without bookies was possible, and that any kind of market could be built on it. At that point, nobody had any idea whether this would actually work at all, he says. A lot of these were untested ideas. In version one, dedicated users would have to wait between six hours and 12 hours just to download the app, and could then create markets, determine potential outcomes and make bets denominated in the highly volatile, and increasingly valuable ethereum cryptocurrency.

In total 2,895 markets were created on version one generating volume of 69,662 ether, or roughly $15 million to $20 million depending on the price of ether over the two year period, according to the Forecast Foundation, which helps oversee development. 2,609 unique visitors made more than 15,000 transactions. 650 reporters staked 1,385,843 REP tokens for fees resulting in 5,758 REP in disputes. To give an idea of how much thats worth, on the early platforms busiest day, $2.5 million worth of assets were locked in active bets at the same time.To give an idea of how much is at stake here, the global online betting industry alone, dominated by middlemen that connect bettors, including FanDuel and Draft Kings, generated $53 billion revenue last year, according to Grand View Research, and is on track to have a compound annual growth rate of 11.5% from 2020 to 2027.

One of the more prolific applications built on version one was Guesser, a venture-backed outfit based largely in Madrid that uses election forecasting models developed by the same market research firm employed by Marco Rubio in his 2016 Presidential campaign, Optimus Analytics, to let users bet on anything from how many times U.S. President Donald Trump mentions China in a speech, to whether or not hell be re-elected later this year. Today in politics, people rely a lot on public polling as a source of data for how a betting market might behave, says Guesser CEO, Jose Garay, 24. We provide them with a data engine with orders of magnitude more data points than you can get from simply public polling. And this allows you to set a very straight forward probability, a very solid price, on each outcome.

The problem was, ethers fluctuating price meant that if a market didnt fulfill for months down the road (imaging placing a bet on who wins the U.S. Presidential election today) users could accurately predict the future, but still lose money if their staked funds decreased in value. In addition, with the price of ethereum increasing from about $1.00 when Augur concluded its ICO to $316 today, many ether owners have been hesitant to trade it, resulting in low liquidity. If Augur version two has to crack one problem, or one challenge says Garay, It's bringing liquidity in big volumes.

While Jack Peterson was largely responsible for managing the somewhat autonomous team of developers working on version one, Krug worked overtime in addition to his job at Pantera Capital to help bring version two over the finish line. As of today, Pantera hasnt invested in any startups building on Augur, choosing rather to let the firms raise their own seed capital, then look to the best of those firms for a possible Series A investment, says Krug. We'd like to invest in whoever we think is doing the best.

Among the notable changes in version two, Augur now has a scam filter that moves likely-fraudulent markets to an area on the site not immediately accessible to new users, and is integrated with a number of distributed applications (dapps) that also dont rely on trusted third parties. For example, it is integrated with the 0x open source software that enables free peer-to-peer bets instead of the fee that was previously charged. Instead of betting ether, users bet DAI, a stablecoin pegged to the U.S, dollar, powered by another dapp called MakerDAO, that provides a free, open-source programming interface for anyone who wants to accept the token. Instead of relying on a trusted third-party to convert a users funds from ether or another cryptocurrency to DAI, Augur is now also integrated with Uniswap, another dapp to automatically provide liquidity on ethereum. Think of it as a DAO of dapps, among the first of a new kind of company without bosses. Everything is sort of interweaved together to broadcast data in an automated fashion, says Krug.

Screen capture of Augur, v2's account summary page.

In a lot of ways, the launch of version two of Augur is a return to an earlier, more idealisticperhaps more naivetime when blockchain innovators might get rich, but thats not what they set out to do, according to Buterin. In addition to encouraging Krug and the founding Augur team to switch from building on a fork of bitcoin to ethereum, Buterin provided technical insight into how to simplify Augur game theory in a way that more efficiently incentivized truth-telling, and in-turn owns an undisclosed amount of REP.

At the beginning, it was much less certain that crypto could have worked as a thing at all. And so the teams that were going in were generally teams that have believed in the vision that we're really doing this collective project for the public good, says Buterin. Obviously you have to fund developments, but we're definitely not going to be greedy about it. And I think what happened over time, and as the model got validated, it started to be definitely this kind of change in mindset where just the fact that it seemed like a clear profit opportunity made it something closer to a kind of regular startup thing.

Now, thats not to say the Augur developers are philanthropists. While Krug and the Forecast Foundation team declined to share how much of the original ICO capital they still hold, they explained that the idea isnt to ever turn the foundation into a profit-generating entity. Rather, the goal is for the organization to follow a similar path as Melonport, a DAO for hedge fund infrastructure, and slowly dissolve once the code on which anyone else can build is complete. At that time, and that time alone, Krug says he might start looking for profit.

Someday the foundation will run out of money and basically, kind of disappear and this becomes an ongoing community developed open source software project, he says, At which point, we could maybe create a for-profit entity on top that does actually try to aggressively make money.

Read this article:
Ethereums First ICO Blazes Trail To A World Without Bosses - Forbes

Julian Assange: WikiLeaks founder faces new indictment in US

Associated Press Published 6:51 p.m. ET June 24, 2020 | Updated 8:42 p.m. ET June 24, 2020

Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange arrives at Southwark Crown Court in London, on May 1, 2019.(Photo: EPA-EFE)

WASHINGTON WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange sought to recruit hackers at conferences in Europe and Asia to provide his anti-secrecy website with classified information and conspired with members of hacking organizations to obtain government secrets, according to a new Justice Department indictment announced Wednesday.

The superseding indictment does not contain additional charges beyond the 18 counts the Justice Department unsealed last year. But prosecutors say it underscores Assanges efforts to procure and release classified information, allegations that form the basis of criminal charges he already faces.

Beyond recruiting hackers at conference, the indictment accuses Assange of conspiring with the leader of LulzSec, a hacking group, and asking to be provided with documents and databases. Prosecutors say Assange also published on WikiLeaks emails from a data breach of an American intelligence community consulting company by a hacker affiliated with LulzSec and Anonymous, another hacking group.

Assanges lawyer, Barry Pollack, said in a statement that the governments relentless pursuit of Julian Assange poses a grave threat to journalists everywhere and to the publics right to know.

Julian Assange: He infuriated Washington. Now he's facing life in prison

While todays superseding indictment is yet another chapter in the U.S. Governments effort to persuade the public that its pursuit of Julian Assange is based on something other than his publication of newsworthy truthful information, he added, the indictment continues to charge him with violating the Espionage Act based on WikiLeaks publications exposing war crimes committed by the U.S. Government.

Assange was arrested last year after being evicted from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London and is at the center of an ongoing extradition tussle over whether he should be sent to the United States.

The Justice Department has already charged him with conspiring with former U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning in one of the largest compromises of classified information in U.S. history. Prosecutors say the WikiLeaks founder damaged national security by publishing hundreds of thousands of classified documents, including diplomatic cables and military files on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, that harmed the U.S. and its allies and aided its adversaries.

Assange maintains he was acting as a journalist entitled to First Amendment protection. His lawyers have argued the U.S. charges of espionage and computer misuse were politically motivated and an abuse of power.

Assange generated substantial attention during the 2016 presidential election, and in investigations that followed, after WikiLeaks published stolen Democratic emails that U.S. authorities say were hacked by Russian military intelligence officials. An investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller revealed how Trump campaign associates eagerly anticipated the email disclosures, and one Trump ally, Roger Stone, was found guilty last year of lying about his efforts to gain inside information about the emails. Assange, however, was never charged in Muellers Russia investigation.

The allegations in the new indictment center on conferences as far back as 2009, in locations including the Netherlands and Malaysia, at which prosecutors say he and a WikiLeaks associate sought to recruit hackers who could locate classified information, including material on a Most Wanted Leaks list posted on WikiLeaks website.

According to the new indictment, he told would-be recruits that unless they were a member of the U.S. military, they faced no legal liability for their actions.

At one conference in Malaysia, called the Hack in the Box Security Conference, Assange told the audience, I was a famous teenage hacker in Australia, and Ive been reading generals emails since I was 17.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/06/24/julian-assange-wikileaks-founder-faces-new-indictment-us/3254831001/

Read more from the original source:
Julian Assange: WikiLeaks founder faces new indictment in US