As a former NSA analyst, I'm dismayed by the continuing revelations of the National Security Agency's warrantless -- and therefore illegal -- spying. The case involves fundamental issues related to NSAs missions and long-standing rules of engagement. What's even more dismaying is the lack of public reaction to this.
Fundamentally, this is an issue of law. FISA, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, was established in 1978 to address a wide variety of issues revolving around Watergate, during which a president used foreign intelligence agencies to collect data on U.S. citizens. As part of FISA, the NSA has to get warrants to analyze and maintain collections of data involving U.S. citizens. FISA has withstood all tests until now, and it involves a fundamental aspect of the U.S. Constitution -- its system of checks and balances.
The FISA law allows NSA to request those warrants up to 72 hours after the fact -- that is, after the data has been analyzed. And lest you think that the courts from which such warrants are requested are staffed by a bunch of liberal, activist, criminal-coddling judges, they have reportedly turned down only five warrants in the last 28 years. So when President Bush says, "If Osama bin Laden is calling someone in the United States, we want to know about it," followed by his nervous laugh, he's laughing at the American public, since "knowing about it" is a totally irrelevant issue. FISA blocks no legitimate acquisition of knowledge.
It doesn't even slow the process down. The issue is not that the NSA cannot examine calls into the U.S. from terrorist suspects -- FISA provides for that -- but that the agency must justify acting on the results and keeping the information within 72 hours. The president claims that the process of getting those warrants -- of complying with the law -- is too time-consuming. Normally, that would sound like simple laziness, but the reality is that the program is so large that they would need an army of lawyers to get all the warrants they'd need to be in compliance with FISA. But the law is the law. No president has the right to pick and choose which laws they find convenient to follow.
If Bush didnt like the FISA laws, he could have asked Congress to amend them. After all, after 9/11 Congress passed a wide variety of laws (without, for the most part, reading them) that were supposed to prevent another attack. They could have easily slipped something modifying FISA into all of that legislation. They did not, though recent revelations about this administration's use of signing statements may indicate that they simply didn't want to raise the possibility of questions.
Ignoring FISA's rules concerning warrants is illegal. It also weakens national security, since the process of obtaining the warrants has an effect on quality control. To date, FBI agents have been sent out to do thousands of investigations based on this warrantless wiretapping. None of those investigations turned up a legitimate lead. I have spoken to about a dozen agents, and they all roll their eyes and indicate disgust with the man-years of wasted effort being put into physically examining NSA "leads."
This scattershot attempt at data mining drags FBI agents away from real investigations, while destroying the NSAs credibility in the eyes of law enforcement and the public in general. That loss of credibility makes the NSA the agency that cried wolf -- and after so many false leads, should they provide something useful, the data will be looked at skeptically and perhaps given lower priority by law enforcement than it would otherwise have been given.
Worse, FBI agents working real and pressing investigations such as organized crime, child pornography and missing persons are being pulled away from their normal law enforcement duties to follow up on NSA leads. Nobody wants another 9/11, of course, but we experience real crimes on a daily basis that, over the course of even one year, cause far greater loss of life and damage than the 9/11 attacks did. There are children abused on a daily basis to facilitate online child pornography, yet I know of at least two agents who were pulled from their duties tracking down child abusers to investigate everyone who called the same pizza parlor as a person who received a call from a person who received an overseas call. There are plenty of similar examples.
We have snakes in our midst, yet we are chasing a mythical beast with completely unreliable evidence.
And now we discover that the NSA is searching through every possible phone call made in the U.S.. They claim that the NSA is not receiving any personally identifying information. Frankly, you have to be a complete moron to believe that. It is trivial to narrow down access to a phone number to just a few members of a household, if not in fact to exactly one person.
The government claims that it got the information legally since it was given the data or bought it from the telecom companies. Perhaps, but USA Today reports that at least one company (Qwest) received threats from the U.S. government for not cooperating. Thats extortion -- another crime.
Congress is not exercising any backbone at all, and neither are its constituents -- a.k.a., you. Every time we receive new information about the NSA domestic spying program, it gets exponentially worse, and it's clear that we still have no clue as to the full extent of the program. More importantly, the courts and Congress do not appear to have a clue as to the full extent of the program, and those bodies are constitutionally required to exercise checks and balances over the NSA. The actions taken by the executive branch after 9/11 aren't protecting our freedom. They are usurping it.
So, besides knowing that it's illegal, that is provides useless information, that it takes law enforcement agents away from investigating and preventing crimes actually being committed, and that it erodes civil liberties, we have no clue how bad it really is. The arguments I hear for it are that 1) I have nothing to worry about so I dont care if they investigate me, 2) we need to do everything we can to protect ourselves, or 3) the NSA isn't listening to the content of the calls, so there's no harm.
Addressing the first point, people who did nothing wrong have been investigated and jailed in this country and others over the years. Additionally, I believe that Saddam Hussein would cheerfully agree with the tired allegation that if you did nothing wrong, you shouldnt mind the government looking at your calls. I think Lenin, Stalin, Hitler and the Chinese government would also agree with that line of thought. Is this the company we consent to keep in the name of safety?
To doing everything we can to protect ourselves, we have, again, pulled law enforcement agents away from real ongoing crimes to investigate poor and scattered "intelligence." This definition of "protection," again, leaves us watching for dragons while very real snakes multiply freely in our midst.
And so what if the NSA isn't listening to the calls themselves? An intelligence agency doesnt need to hear your chatter to invade your privacy. By simply tying numbers together -- an intelligence discipline of traffic analysis -- I assure you I can put together a portrait of your life. I'll know your friends, your hobbies, where your children go to school, if youre having an affair, whether you plan to take a trip and even when you're awake or asleep. Give me a list of whom youre calling and I can tell most of the critical things I need to know about you.
Unnerved at the prospect of one person holding that data? You should be. While I can personally attest to the fact that the vast majority of NSA employees are good and honest people, the NSA has more than its share of bitter, vindictive mid- and senior-level bureaucrats. I would not trust my personal information with these people, since I have personally seen them use internal information against their enemies.
At the same time, we have seen the Bush administration go after Joesph Wilson, the ambassador who spoke out against the Bush administration, by leaking potentially classified information about him. They vigorously tried to undermine the credibility of Richard Clarke and others who spoke out against them. Now consider that the NSA telephone call database is not classified; there's no legal reason that they can't use this database as vindictively as they did, even when the data was potentially classified, as in releasing the information that Valerie Plame, Wilsons wife, worked for the CIA.
Over the years, I have defended the NSA and its employees as reasonable and law abiding. I was all for invading Afghanistan, deployment of the Clipper Chip and many other controversial government programs. NSA domestic spying is against everything I was ever taught working at the NSA. I might be more for it if there was any credible evidence that this somehow provides useful information that couldnt otherwise be had. However, the domestic spying program has gotten so massive that the well-established process of getting a warrant cannot be followed -- and quantity most certainly doesn't translate to quality. Quite the opposite.
Again, I'm not arguing against allowing the NSA or other intelligence agencies to collect information on terrorists. My problem is that they are bypassing legally required oversight mechanisms. This implies that the operations are massive, and go well beyond the scope of looking at terrorists. Not only is this diminishing what makes America unique and worth preserving, it removes all quality control and puts the country at increased risks by moving resources away from critical investigations of more substantial threats.
I think Sen. Jon Kyl, a strong supporter of the NSA domestic spying program, said it best: "We have got to collect intelligence on the enemy." I fully agree. But the enemy numbers in the hundreds at best. the NSA is collecting data on hundreds of millions of people who are clearly not the enemy. These numbers speak for themselves.
Ira Winkler is president of the Internet Security Advisors Group. He is a former National Security Agency analyst and the author of Spies Among Us (Wiley, 2005).
Related Opinion:
Read more:
Opinion: Why NSA spying puts the U.S. in danger ...
- Iraq to NSA spying: The biggest revelations by Julian Assanges WikiLeaks - Al Jazeera English - June 26th, 2024
- Just the Facts: What We Know About the NSA Spying on Americans - December 28th, 2022
- Big Brother Has Hacked the Constitution - Tenth Amendment Center - September 13th, 2022
- Julian Assange is my husband his extradition is an abomination - The Independent - June 29th, 2022
- NSA Surveillance: Why NSA Spying On Us - RedefinePrivacy - April 28th, 2022
- Edward Snowden - Wikipedia - April 13th, 2022
- EU/US Say They've Agreed To A New Privacy Shield That Doesn't Seem To Deal With Any Of The Problems Of The Old One - Techdirt - April 1st, 2022
- Global surveillance disclosures (2013present) - Wikipedia - January 15th, 2022
- Four refugees who sheltered Snowden find sanctuary in Canada - FRANCE 24 - October 5th, 2021
- Section 215 Expired: Year in Review 2020 - EFF - December 31st, 2020
- America's Nihilism blues | The Retriever - The Retriever - November 18th, 2020
- The socialist perspective in the 2020 US elections - World Socialist Web Site - WSWS - November 7th, 2020
- Big Brother is spying on you - Hillsboro Times Gazette - October 28th, 2020
- From Scandals To War, Here Are The 15 Best Documentaries Of All Time According To Rotten Tomatoes - ScoopWhoop - September 29th, 2020
- Guest view: Should Trump pardon Edward Snowden? - The-review - August 30th, 2020
- Screen Talk 300: Revisiting the Biggest Stories of the Last Six Years - IndieWire - August 30th, 2020
- Trump Wants to Build a Wall Around the Internet, How Worried Should The U.S. Be? - Gizmodo Australia - August 21st, 2020
- A list of known NSA spying techniques - Tumbex - July 27th, 2020
- How does NSA spying effect you? (Infographic) - ProPrivacy.com - July 22nd, 2020
- NSA Spying Federal Jack - July 22nd, 2020
- NSA Spokesman Accidentally Admits that the Government Is ... - July 22nd, 2020
- Liz Cheney the latest target of Trump loyalists which is enough to label her voice of reason on the left - RT - July 21st, 2020
- EU Court Again Rules That NSA Spying Makes U.S. Companies ... - July 18th, 2020
- Op-ed: Congress must act now to rein in the NSA's ... - July 18th, 2020
- Join EFF's 30th Anniversary Livestream and Party Like It's 1990! - EFF - July 9th, 2020
- 8 Ways The NSA is Spying on You Right Now - July 9th, 2020
- The Lizard People Invented Bitcoin: Why Crypto is a Hotbed for Conspiracy Theories - Cointelegraph - June 3rd, 2020
- Made-up murder claims, threats to kill Twitter, rants about NSA spying anything but mention 100,000 US virus deaths, right, Mr President? - The... - May 29th, 2020
- Author David Rohde on what the deep state is and why Trump is obsessed with it - Vox.com - May 13th, 2020
- Yes, Section 215 Expired. Now What? - EFF - April 17th, 2020
- More Than Half of Adults Say Their Video Calls Are Secure, Despite Hacking Concerns - Morning Consult - April 12th, 2020
- Edward Snowden warns COVID-19 could give governments invasive new data collection powers that will last long a - Business Insider India - March 30th, 2020
- ASSANGE EXTRADITION: An Extension of the US War on Terror - Consortium News - March 27th, 2020
- Assange's Extradition: An Escalation of the US War on Terror - Common Dreams - March 27th, 2020
- Presidential Candidates Should Declare Their Stance on "Costly Failure of the NSA's Unconstitutional Mass Surveillance Program," Says... - February 27th, 2020
- LTE: The Deep State is alive in well - GoErie.com - February 27th, 2020
- Pilger, Burchett and Assange: Three Extraordinary Australian Journalists That Spoke Truth to Power - Mintpress News - February 12th, 2020
- Edward Snowden warns that Assange and Greenwald prosecutions mark new stage in assault on press freedom - World Socialist Web Site - January 31st, 2020
- 8 Ways the NSA Is Spying on You Right Now | ExpressVPN - January 19th, 2020
- Trump administration to illegally divert an additional $7.2 billion to border wall construction - World Socialist Web Site - January 19th, 2020
- So, who has been wiretapping the prime minister? - Free Malaysia Today - January 9th, 2020
- Tucker Carlson Patrick McGeehan and Rising Deep Red State Revulsion Against the Neocons - Morgan County USA - January 8th, 2020
- 11 Tech Trends We Need to Dump in 2020 - PCMag AU - December 26th, 2019
- If Devin Nunes wants to call the FBI 'dirty cops', he better be ready to propose a solution - The Independent - December 19th, 2019
- The Simpsons even predicted the Anthony Joshua v Andy Ruiz Jr rematch - GIVEMESPORT - December 9th, 2019
- Nov. 21 Letters to the Editor | Opinion - Lewiston Morning Tribune - November 21st, 2019
- 5 Myths About the National Security Agency - ClearanceJobs - November 5th, 2019
- Democrats Make a Huge Mistake If They Just Focus Impeachment on the Ukraine Scandal - CounterPunch - November 5th, 2019
- Democrats make a huge mistake if they just focus impeachment on the Ukraine scandal - NationofChange - November 2nd, 2019
- Democrats are Making a Huge Mistake on Impeachment if They Focus on the Ukraine Scandal - ThisCantBeHappening! - October 31st, 2019
- NSA Spying on Americans Is Illegal | American Civil ... - October 7th, 2019
- NSA spying? Everyone does it. - CSMonitor.com - May 26th, 2019
- NSA spying fiasco sending customers overseas | Computerworld - May 23rd, 2019
- NSA Spying Violated The Constitution - Business Insider - May 13th, 2019
- Judge Dodges Legality of NSA Mass Spying, Citing Secrecy ... - May 3rd, 2019
- Judge who ruled against NSA spying passes on Corsi case ... - April 5th, 2019
- Hearing Friday in Jewel NSA Spying Lawsuit: EFF Asks Court ... - March 28th, 2019
- Video: New NSA Spying Revelations Spark Call for More ... - March 19th, 2019
- NSA spying scandal: what we have learned | US news | The ... - March 8th, 2019
- Clapper claims he didnt lie about NSA spying on ... - March 7th, 2019
- NSA spying program ended six months ago, maybe permanently ... - March 7th, 2019
- Clapper: I Didnt Lie to Congress About NSA Spying I ... - March 7th, 2019
- Congress Reauthorizes NSA Spying on Americans American ... - March 5th, 2019
- European officials lash out at new NSA spying report - CBS ... - March 1st, 2019
- Huawei: U.S. Is Afraid We Will Stop NSA Spying -- It Has ... - February 28th, 2019
- Obama Justifies NSA Spying: Paul Revere Did It First - February 28th, 2019
- Mass government surveillance pros and cons: NSA spying ... - February 22nd, 2019
- Judge: NSA spying almost Orwellian, likely unconstitutional - February 12th, 2019
- The NSAs Hidden Spy Hubs in Eight U.S. Cities - August 5th, 2018
- The Trump Administration Is Hiding a Crucial Report on NSA ... - July 16th, 2018
- Obama knew of NSA spying on Merkel and approved it, report ... - July 16th, 2018
- AT&T collaborates on NSA spying through a web of secretive ... - June 28th, 2018
- Potential NSA spying hub revealed in D.C. AT&T building ... - June 28th, 2018
- RNC condemns NSA spying in huge turnaround | MSNBC - April 2nd, 2018
- Stop the Expansion of NSA Spying - eff.org - February 25th, 2018
- Congress demanded NSA spying reform. Instead, they let you ... - January 21st, 2018
- National Security Agency - Wikipedia - January 17th, 2018
- Dont Reauthorize NSA Spying in a Must-Pass Funding Bill ... - December 21st, 2017
- FACT CHECK: Did Clapper Get 'Caught Lying To Congress'? - The Daily Caller - August 24th, 2017
- The struggalo is real as radical ICP fans mobilize online - A.V. Club - August 18th, 2017