Click here for more on NSA Surveillance
What if it emerged that the President of the United States was flagrantly violating the Constitution and a law passed by the Congress to protect Americans against abuses by a super-secret spy agency? What if, instead of apologizing, he said, in essence, "I have the power to do that, because I say I can." That frightening scenario is exactly what we are now witnessing in the case of the warrantless NSA spying ordered by President Bush that was reported December 16, 2005 by the New York Times.
According to the Times, Bush signed a presidential order in 2002 allowing the National Security Agency to monitor without a warrant the international (and sometimes domestic) telephone calls and e-mail messages of hundreds or thousands of citizens and legal residents inside the United States. The program eventually came to include some purely internal controls - but no requirement that warrants be obtained from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court as the 4th Amendment to the Constitution and the foreign intelligence surveillance laws require.
In other words, no independent review or judicial oversight.
That kind of surveillance is illegal. Period.
The day after this shocking abuse of power became public, President Bush admitted that he had authorized it, but argued that he had the authority to do so. But the law governing government eavesdropping on American citizens is well-established and crystal clear. President Bush's claim that he is not bound by that law is simply astounding. It is a Presidential power grab that poses a challenge in the deepest sense to the integrity of the American system of government - the separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches, the concept of checks and balances on executive power, the notion that the president is subject to the law like everyone else, and the general respect for the "rule of law" on which our democratic system depends.
The ACLU ran the following advertisement in the December 29, 2005 edition of The New York Times:
The tensions between the need for intelligence agencies to protect the nation and the danger that they would become a domestic spy agency have been explicitly and repeatedly fought out in American history. The National Security Act of 1947 contained a specific ban on intelligence operatives from operating domestically. In the 1970s, America learned about the extensive domestic political spying carried out by the FBI, the military, the CIA, and the NSA, and Congress passed new laws to prevent a repeat of those abuses. Surveillance laws were debated and modified under presidents Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush Sr. and Clinton.
But, President Bush would sweep aside this entire body of democratically debated and painstakingly crafted restrictions on domestic surveillance by the executive branch with his extraordinary assertion that he can simply ignore this law because he is the Commander-in-Chief. In a December 17 radio address, for example, Bush asserted that the spying was "fully consistent with my constitutional responsibilities and authorities." But his constitutional duty is to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed" (Article II, Section 3); the law here clearly establishes well-defined procedures for eavesdropping on U.S. persons, and the fact is, Bush ordered that those procedures not be followed.
Government eavesdropping on Americans is an extremely serious matter; the ability to intrude on the private realm is a tremendous power that can be used to monitor, embarass, control, disgrace, or ruin an individual. Because it is so invasive, the technology of wiretapping has been subject to carefully crafted statutory controls almost since it was invented. Ignoring those controls and wiretapping without a court order is a crime that carries a significant prison sentence (in fact, criminal violations of the wiretap statute were among the articles of impeachment that were drafted against President Nixon shortly before his resignation).
Unfortunately, although the law in this matter is crystal clear, many Americans, faced with President Bush's bold assertions of "inherent" authority for these actions, will not know what to believe. There are only 5 points they need to understand:
The law on surveillance begins with the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, which states clearly that Americans' privacy may not be invaded without a warrant based on probable cause.
United States ConstitutionFourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. (emphasis added)
The US Supreme Court (US v. Katz 389 US 347) has made it clear that this core privacy protection does cover government eavesdropping. As a result, all electronic surveillance by the government in the United States is illegal, unless it falls under one of a small number of precise exceptions specifically carved out in the law.
United States Code Title 50, Chapter 36, Subchapter 1Section 1809. Criminal sanctions
(a) Prohibited activitiesA person is guilty of an offense if he intentionally-
(1) engages in electronic surveillance under color of law except as authorized by statute
In other words, the NSA can only spy where it is explicitly granted permission to do so by statute. Citizens concerned about surveillance do not have to answer the question, "what law restricts the NSA's spying?" Rather, the government is required to supply an answer to the question "what law permits the NSA to spy?"
There are only three laws that authorize any exceptions to the ban on electronic eavesdropping by the government. Congress has explicitly stated that these three laws are the exclusive means by which domestic electronic surveillance can be carried out (18 USC, Section 2511(2)(f)). They are:
Title III and ECPA govern domestic criminal wiretaps and are not relevant to the NSA's spying. FISA is the law under which the NSA should have operated. It authorizes the government to conduct surveillance in certain situations without meeting all of the requirements of the Fourth Amendment that apply under criminal law, but requires that an independent Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court oversee that surveillance to make sure that Americans who have no ties to foreign terrorist organizations or other "foreign powers" are not spied upon.
FISA was significantly loosened by the Patriot Act (which, for example, allowed it to be used for some criminal investigations), and parts of it now stand in clear violation of the Constitution's Fourth Amendment in the view of the ACLU and many others. However, even the post-Patriot Act version of FISA does not authorize the president to conduct warrantless eavesdropping on U.S. citizens or permanent legal residents in the U.S. without an order from the FISA Court. Yet it is that very court order requirement - imposed to protect innocent Americans - that the President has ignored.
In fact, one member of the FISA Court, Judge James Roberston, has apparently resigned from the court in protest of President Bush's secret authorization of this program. And the New York Times reported that the court's chief judge complained about the program when she was (belatedly) notified of it, and refused to allow information gathered under the program to be used as the basis for FISA wiretap orders.
Congress after 9/11 approved an Authorization to Use Military Force against those responsible for the attacks in order to authorize the president to conduct foreign military operations such as the invasion of Afghanistan.
But that resolution contains no language changing, overriding or repealing any laws passed by Congress. Congress does not repeal legislation through hints and innuendos, and the Authorization to Use Military Force does not authorize the president to violate the law against surveillance without a warrant any more than it authorizes him to carry out an armed robbery or seize control of Citibank in order to pay for operations against terrorists. In fact, when President Truman tried to seize control of steel mills that were gripped by strikes in 1952, the Supreme Court decisively rejected his authority to make such a seizure, even in the face of arguments that the strike would interfere with the supply of weapons and ammunition to American troops then under fire on the battlefields of the Korean War.
U.S. Supreme CourtYOUNGSTOWN CO. v. SAWYER, 343 U.S. 579 (1952)
"The order cannot properly be sustained as an exercise of the President's military power as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. . . .
"Nor can the seizure order be sustained because of the several constitutional provisions that grant executive power to the President. . . . The Constitution limits his functions in the lawmaking process to the recommending of laws he thinks wise and the vetoing of laws he thinks bad. And the Constitution is neither silent nor equivocal about who shall make laws which the President is to execute. . . .
"The Founders of this Nation entrusted the lawmaking power to the Congress alone in both good and bad times."
The Supreme Court also rejected similar assertions of inherent executive power by Richard Nixon.
In fact, FISA contains explicit language describing the president's powers "during time of war" and provides that "the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this title to acquire foreign intelligence information for a period not to exceed fifteen days following a declaration of war by the Congress." 50 U.S.C. 1811 (emphasis added). So even if we accept the argument that the use-of-force resolution places us on a war footing, warrantless surveillance would have been legal for only 15 days after the resolution was passed on September 18, 2001.
Point #5: The need for quick action does not justify an end-run around the courtsThe FISA law takes account of the need for emergency surveillance, and the need for quick action cannot be used as a rationale for going outside the law. FISA allows wiretapping without a court order in an emergency; the court must simply be notified within 72 hours. The government is aware of this emergency power and has used it repeatedly. In addition, the Foreign Intelligence court is physically located in the Justice Department building, and the FISA law requires that at least two of the FISA judges reside in the Washington, DC area, for precisely the reason that rapid action is sometimes needed.
If President Bush still for some reason finds these provisions to be inadequate, he must take his case to Congress and ask for the law to be changed, not simply ignore it.
President Bush's claim that he has "inherent authority" as Commander-in-Chief to use our spy agencies to eavesdrop on Americans is astonishing, and such spying is clearly illegal. It must be halted immediately, and its origins must be thoroughly investigated by Congress and by a special counsel. (See letter from the ACLU to Attorney General Gonzales calling for a special counsel).
Given the extensive (indeed, excessive) surveillance powers that the government already possesses, the Administration's blatantly illegal use of warrantless surveillance raises an important question: why? One possibility, raised by the New York Times in a Dec. 24, 2005 story ("Spy Agency Mined Vast Data Trove, Officials Report"), is that the NSA is relying on assistance from several unnamed telecommunications companies to "trace and analyze large volumes of communications" and is "much larger than the White House has acknowledged."
This, as security expert Bruce Schneier has noted, suggests the Bush Administration has developed a "a whole new surveillance paradigm" - exploiting the NSA's well known capabilities to spy on individuals not one at a time, as FISA permits, but to run communications en masse through computers in the search for suspicious individuals or patterns. This "new paradigm" may well be connected to the NSA program sometimes known as "Echelon," which carries out just that kind of mass collection of communications (see http://www.nsawatch.org). This "wholesale" surveillance, as Schneier calls it, would constitute an illegal invasion of Americans' privacy on a scale that has never before been seen. (See Schneier, "NSA and Bush's Illegal Eavesdropping," Salon.com)
According to the Times, several telecommunications companies provided the NSA with direct access to streams of communications over their networks. In other words, the NSA appears to have direct access to a large volume of Americans' communications - with not simply the assent, but the cooperation of the companies handling those communications.
We do not know from the report which companies are involved or precisely how or what the NSA can access. But this revelation raises questions about both the legal authority of the NSA to request and receive this data, and whether these companies may have violated either the Federal laws protecting these communications or their own stated privacy polices (which may, for example, provide that they will only turn over their customers' data with their consent or in response to a proper order).
Regardless of the scale of this spying, we are facing a historic moment: the President of the United States has claimed a sweeping wartime power to brush aside the clear limits on his power set by our Constitution and laws - a chilling assertion of presidential power that has not been seen since Richard Nixon.
See more here:
NSA Spying on Americans Is Illegal | American Civil ...
- Iraq to NSA spying: The biggest revelations by Julian Assanges WikiLeaks - Al Jazeera English - June 26th, 2024
- Just the Facts: What We Know About the NSA Spying on Americans - December 28th, 2022
- Big Brother Has Hacked the Constitution - Tenth Amendment Center - September 13th, 2022
- Julian Assange is my husband his extradition is an abomination - The Independent - June 29th, 2022
- NSA Surveillance: Why NSA Spying On Us - RedefinePrivacy - April 28th, 2022
- Edward Snowden - Wikipedia - April 13th, 2022
- EU/US Say They've Agreed To A New Privacy Shield That Doesn't Seem To Deal With Any Of The Problems Of The Old One - Techdirt - April 1st, 2022
- Global surveillance disclosures (2013present) - Wikipedia - January 15th, 2022
- Four refugees who sheltered Snowden find sanctuary in Canada - FRANCE 24 - October 5th, 2021
- Section 215 Expired: Year in Review 2020 - EFF - December 31st, 2020
- America's Nihilism blues | The Retriever - The Retriever - November 18th, 2020
- The socialist perspective in the 2020 US elections - World Socialist Web Site - WSWS - November 7th, 2020
- Big Brother is spying on you - Hillsboro Times Gazette - October 28th, 2020
- From Scandals To War, Here Are The 15 Best Documentaries Of All Time According To Rotten Tomatoes - ScoopWhoop - September 29th, 2020
- Guest view: Should Trump pardon Edward Snowden? - The-review - August 30th, 2020
- Screen Talk 300: Revisiting the Biggest Stories of the Last Six Years - IndieWire - August 30th, 2020
- Trump Wants to Build a Wall Around the Internet, How Worried Should The U.S. Be? - Gizmodo Australia - August 21st, 2020
- A list of known NSA spying techniques - Tumbex - July 27th, 2020
- How does NSA spying effect you? (Infographic) - ProPrivacy.com - July 22nd, 2020
- NSA Spying Federal Jack - July 22nd, 2020
- NSA Spokesman Accidentally Admits that the Government Is ... - July 22nd, 2020
- Liz Cheney the latest target of Trump loyalists which is enough to label her voice of reason on the left - RT - July 21st, 2020
- EU Court Again Rules That NSA Spying Makes U.S. Companies ... - July 18th, 2020
- Op-ed: Congress must act now to rein in the NSA's ... - July 18th, 2020
- Join EFF's 30th Anniversary Livestream and Party Like It's 1990! - EFF - July 9th, 2020
- 8 Ways The NSA is Spying on You Right Now - July 9th, 2020
- The Lizard People Invented Bitcoin: Why Crypto is a Hotbed for Conspiracy Theories - Cointelegraph - June 3rd, 2020
- Made-up murder claims, threats to kill Twitter, rants about NSA spying anything but mention 100,000 US virus deaths, right, Mr President? - The... - May 29th, 2020
- Author David Rohde on what the deep state is and why Trump is obsessed with it - Vox.com - May 13th, 2020
- Yes, Section 215 Expired. Now What? - EFF - April 17th, 2020
- More Than Half of Adults Say Their Video Calls Are Secure, Despite Hacking Concerns - Morning Consult - April 12th, 2020
- Edward Snowden warns COVID-19 could give governments invasive new data collection powers that will last long a - Business Insider India - March 30th, 2020
- ASSANGE EXTRADITION: An Extension of the US War on Terror - Consortium News - March 27th, 2020
- Assange's Extradition: An Escalation of the US War on Terror - Common Dreams - March 27th, 2020
- Presidential Candidates Should Declare Their Stance on "Costly Failure of the NSA's Unconstitutional Mass Surveillance Program," Says... - February 27th, 2020
- LTE: The Deep State is alive in well - GoErie.com - February 27th, 2020
- Pilger, Burchett and Assange: Three Extraordinary Australian Journalists That Spoke Truth to Power - Mintpress News - February 12th, 2020
- Edward Snowden warns that Assange and Greenwald prosecutions mark new stage in assault on press freedom - World Socialist Web Site - January 31st, 2020
- 8 Ways the NSA Is Spying on You Right Now | ExpressVPN - January 19th, 2020
- Trump administration to illegally divert an additional $7.2 billion to border wall construction - World Socialist Web Site - January 19th, 2020
- So, who has been wiretapping the prime minister? - Free Malaysia Today - January 9th, 2020
- Tucker Carlson Patrick McGeehan and Rising Deep Red State Revulsion Against the Neocons - Morgan County USA - January 8th, 2020
- 11 Tech Trends We Need to Dump in 2020 - PCMag AU - December 26th, 2019
- If Devin Nunes wants to call the FBI 'dirty cops', he better be ready to propose a solution - The Independent - December 19th, 2019
- The Simpsons even predicted the Anthony Joshua v Andy Ruiz Jr rematch - GIVEMESPORT - December 9th, 2019
- Nov. 21 Letters to the Editor | Opinion - Lewiston Morning Tribune - November 21st, 2019
- 5 Myths About the National Security Agency - ClearanceJobs - November 5th, 2019
- Democrats Make a Huge Mistake If They Just Focus Impeachment on the Ukraine Scandal - CounterPunch - November 5th, 2019
- Democrats make a huge mistake if they just focus impeachment on the Ukraine scandal - NationofChange - November 2nd, 2019
- Democrats are Making a Huge Mistake on Impeachment if They Focus on the Ukraine Scandal - ThisCantBeHappening! - October 31st, 2019
- Opinion: Why NSA spying puts the U.S. in danger ... - May 31st, 2019
- NSA spying? Everyone does it. - CSMonitor.com - May 26th, 2019
- NSA spying fiasco sending customers overseas | Computerworld - May 23rd, 2019
- NSA Spying Violated The Constitution - Business Insider - May 13th, 2019
- Judge Dodges Legality of NSA Mass Spying, Citing Secrecy ... - May 3rd, 2019
- Judge who ruled against NSA spying passes on Corsi case ... - April 5th, 2019
- Hearing Friday in Jewel NSA Spying Lawsuit: EFF Asks Court ... - March 28th, 2019
- Video: New NSA Spying Revelations Spark Call for More ... - March 19th, 2019
- NSA spying scandal: what we have learned | US news | The ... - March 8th, 2019
- Clapper claims he didnt lie about NSA spying on ... - March 7th, 2019
- NSA spying program ended six months ago, maybe permanently ... - March 7th, 2019
- Clapper: I Didnt Lie to Congress About NSA Spying I ... - March 7th, 2019
- Congress Reauthorizes NSA Spying on Americans American ... - March 5th, 2019
- European officials lash out at new NSA spying report - CBS ... - March 1st, 2019
- Huawei: U.S. Is Afraid We Will Stop NSA Spying -- It Has ... - February 28th, 2019
- Obama Justifies NSA Spying: Paul Revere Did It First - February 28th, 2019
- Mass government surveillance pros and cons: NSA spying ... - February 22nd, 2019
- Judge: NSA spying almost Orwellian, likely unconstitutional - February 12th, 2019
- The NSAs Hidden Spy Hubs in Eight U.S. Cities - August 5th, 2018
- The Trump Administration Is Hiding a Crucial Report on NSA ... - July 16th, 2018
- Obama knew of NSA spying on Merkel and approved it, report ... - July 16th, 2018
- AT&T collaborates on NSA spying through a web of secretive ... - June 28th, 2018
- Potential NSA spying hub revealed in D.C. AT&T building ... - June 28th, 2018
- RNC condemns NSA spying in huge turnaround | MSNBC - April 2nd, 2018
- Stop the Expansion of NSA Spying - eff.org - February 25th, 2018
- Congress demanded NSA spying reform. Instead, they let you ... - January 21st, 2018
- National Security Agency - Wikipedia - January 17th, 2018
- Dont Reauthorize NSA Spying in a Must-Pass Funding Bill ... - December 21st, 2017
- FACT CHECK: Did Clapper Get 'Caught Lying To Congress'? - The Daily Caller - August 24th, 2017
- The struggalo is real as radical ICP fans mobilize online - A.V. Club - August 18th, 2017