Yesterday, the Supreme Court voted to uphold a Mississippi abortion ban and overturn Roe v. Wade, ending abortion access in some states and triggering impending bans in others. The decision wont end abortion in America, but in many places it will move the procedure underground and, based on recent history, online.
Understandably, abortion advocates have focused on surveillance issues in the immediate aftermath of the ruling, concerned about states using online records for criminal prosecutions. But theres also a fight brewing over how and where advocates will be able to share abortion information online. If a procedure is illegal, then states could claim content enabling that procedure is illegal too raising thorny questions for platforms and activists alike.
Abortion bans in states like Texas already have provisions to penalize people seen as aiding and abetting the procedure, and some anti-abortion activists are pushing to define this as simply describing how to self-manage an abortion. As The Appeal noted earlier this week, the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) has proposed model legislation that would prohibit offering instructions over the telephone, the internet, or any other medium of communication or hosting or maintaining a website, or providing internet service, that encourages or facilitates efforts to obtain an illegal abortion.
The language seems aimed at sites like Plan C, which offers detailed information about obtaining misoprostol and mifepristone for self-managed abortion. Many news outlets, including Verge sister site The Cut, have also published detailed information about the subject. Broad terms like hosting would even seemingly let states go after internet infrastructure providers that support sites like Plan C or social networks that they use to spread information.
Civil liberties advocates assert that this would be unconstitutional. This kind of legislation raises serious First Amendment concerns, said Knight First Amendment Institute executive director Jameel Jaffer. We intend to consider challenging any legislation that uses todays Supreme Court decision as a justification for new limitations on protected speech, or new forms of surveillance.
Motivated prosecutors may still try to punish outlets that share information, arguing that the material is specifically intended to help others break the law, and drag them into expensive and protracted legal cases even if they ultimately prevail. Explaining what abortion is, where you can get one, advocating for a persons right or ability to get an abortion all these things are general truthful information that cannot be prosecuted without violating the First Amendment, says ACLU counsel Jennifer Granick. The risk is that prosecutors will take those private conversations where people are exchanging information and try to cast those as criminal encounters. And that will be something that were going to probably end up having to fight.
Activists and health care providers have an incentive to fight these battles but the digital platforms they use might not. Opponents of legal abortion could threaten any company involved in hosting speech with lawsuits if they allow abortion-related communications. Potential targets range from social networks like Facebook, where its easy to connect with people seeking abortions, to infrastructure providers like content delivery networks (CDNs), which provide critical logistical support for independent websites.
Right now, platforms have an easy answer to threats: Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Section 230 shields apps and websites from being considered the publisher or speaker of user-generated content, protecting them from liability over hosting it. Unlike a First Amendment defense, it doesnt require fighting over whether the content in question is illegal, reducing the legal burden of lawsuits. The thing about Section 230 is you dont have to demonstrate that its First Amendment protected speech, which can take a long, long time sometimes in litigation, says Granick. Theres an exception for conduct that violates federal criminal law, but not violations of state laws like the current abortion bans.
Still, Section 230 has become increasingly unpopular among Republicans and Democrats alike. Federal bills like the EARN IT Act and the SAFE TECH Act have proposed chipping away at its protections, while Texas and Florida have passed laws on the premise that Section 230 shouldnt stop states from implementing their own content moderation laws. In 2018, then-President Donald Trump signed FOSTA-SESTA, which removed protections for material related to sex work, with support from both parties.
Critics of Section 230 have cited real cases of sites (usually not the typical Big Tech targets) using it to avoid responsibility for encouraging nonconsensual pornography or defamatory lies. Many proposals for fixing this, however, contain broad carveouts that could be exploited to make learning about abortion harder even if thats not the goal.
Research suggests FOSTA-SESTA led to a mass deplatforming of sex workers online, whether or not they were directly posting illegal content, and the ripple effects made it harder to operate services like online sex education. Further weakening the law could have similar chilling effects on abortion information too, with sites deciding to err on the side of caution rather than risk legal liability.
Sometimes people say, well, whats the problem? says Granick of Section 230 carveouts. For instance, if we have an exception for federal crimes, why shouldnt we also have an exception to allow liability for state crimes? And this is like Exhibit A in why we dont want to open up liability to state criminal provisions.
Fight for the Future director Evan Greer says the death of Roe adds dangerous side effects to current proposals. Even well-intentioned changes to Section 230, like those proposed in the SAFE TECH Act or Justice Against Malicious Algorithms Act, could unleash a wave of lawsuits from anti-abortion activists (who are already lawyered up, litigious, and highly motivated to get content about abortion access scrubbed from the internet), says Greer. Companies could respond by minimizing their risk, resulting in anything from crowdfunding sites banning abortion access funds to online social spaces shutting down people who try to arrange travel and logistics for cross-state abortions.
Weakening Section 230 would be a disaster in a post-Roe environment, Greer continues.
There are good reasons to be wary of organizing abortion access on major platforms, like leaving a data trail that could be used by police in prosecutions. But overzealous bans would just make finding health information harder. For lawmakers who have backed keeping abortion accessible, thats a risk any future Section 230 reform will have to reckon with.
See the original post here:
The brewing fight to keep abortion info online - The Verge
- Judge blocks Texas bill aimed at preventing social media companies from deplatforming people based on their ... - AOL - February 25th, 2024
- Introducing FIRE's Campus Deplatforming Database | The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - Foundation for Individual Rights in Education - February 9th, 2024
- Alex Jones To Tucker Carlson: My Sin Was Decompartmentalizing The American Population - RealClearPolitics - December 11th, 2023
- Does 'deplatforming' work to curb hate speech and calls for ... - October 16th, 2023
- Weighing the Value and Risks of Deplatforming GNET - October 16th, 2023
- TIMELINE: Trump reinstated from 'permanent' social media bans, but will that last? - WCYB - March 31st, 2023
- Twitter Found Trump Didn't Violate Policy, But Banned Him Anyway - December 28th, 2022
- Social media misogyny: The new way Andrew Tate brought us the same old hate - December 28th, 2022
- Google Pays Sharath Bulusu: Well-meaning regulation will help market mature - The Indian Express - December 28th, 2022
- WordPress discussed deplatforming The New York Post after Hunter Biden ... - December 20th, 2022
- App Store 'Gatekeepers' Urged To Deplatform "Dangerous" Twitter Itself - December 12th, 2022
- FACT CHECK: Did Elon Musk Call Twitter Users Upset By Trumps ... - December 12th, 2022
- 'Deplatforming the President': Twitter Files Part 3 reveals events that led to removal of Donald Trump - Business Today - December 12th, 2022
- Twitter Files Part 2: Top Twitter execs interfered with US election before banning Donald Trump - msnNOW - December 12th, 2022
- Conservatives Are Mad Kanye Is Being Censored for Antisemitism ... - November 25th, 2022
- Chronicles Magazine : A Magazine of American Culture - November 17th, 2022
- Amazon accused of absurd and unacceptable censorship after book ... - November 17th, 2022
- PayPal's ideological deplatforming spurs proposed UK amendment to stop ... - November 17th, 2022
- Andrew Tates popularity decreases following deplatforming from social ... - November 7th, 2022
- This is for people who think deplatforming doesn't work - November 7th, 2022
- 4 Great Email Templates For Leaving Your Job - Jobbio Journal - October 31st, 2022
- What is Social Media? - TechTarget - October 31st, 2022
- The dangers of deplatforming - October 31st, 2022
- A Middlebury College Expert Explains the Ways Social Media Fuels Hate and How to Stop It - Seven Days - October 23rd, 2022
- Alex Jones ordered to pay $965 million after misinformation campaign targeting Sandy Hook families - Yahoo Finance - October 15th, 2022
- Kanye West Bank Ban Is An Indefensible Slippery Slope - OutKick - October 15th, 2022
- My New Paper: Donald Trump Should Remain Deplatformed from Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube Despite the High Bar That Platforms Should Apply to the... - October 15th, 2022
- As Washington Post targets Catholic hospitals, every religious institution needs to build defenses - Washington Examiner - October 15th, 2022
- TMCs Derek OBrien steps in to give legitimacy to The Wires Meta joke that turned out to be a hoax - OpIndia - October 15th, 2022
- LeBron James' The Shop Will Not Air Episode Featuring Kanye West After Controversial Remarks By The Rapper - Yardbarker - October 15th, 2022
- Verizon Blacklists One America News Network Following ... - Breitbart - October 7th, 2022
- Conference aims to make trust and safety hot topics in computer science - The Stanford Daily - October 7th, 2022
- Sneako: Andrew Tate 2.0 Has Been Kicked Off YouTube | 2022 - The Latch - October 7th, 2022
- An Early Conservative Victory in the War on Big Tech | Opinion - Newsweek - October 7th, 2022
- Students respond to upcoming Congress to Campus event - Macalester College The Mac Weekly - October 7th, 2022
- Supreme Court Is Putting the Future of Section 230 Protections on Its Docket - Gizmodo - October 7th, 2022
- How to fundraise when the powerful want to stop you - Open Democracy - October 7th, 2022
- Piers Morgan Has Just Grilled Andrew Tate in a Live TV Interview - We Got This Covered - October 7th, 2022
- Kiwi Farms Is Down After Cloudflare Boots the Site as a Customer - September 29th, 2022
- How two Republicans in Florida are dominating the news - POLITICO - September 29th, 2022
- "White Psychodrama" and the culture wars: A self-reinforcing cycle, going nowhere - Salon - September 29th, 2022
- Regulating Misinformation on Twitter is a Problem, But There Are Bigger Ones on the Horizon - Tech Policy Press - September 29th, 2022
- It's Time to Stop Platforming the Big Lie Playbook - Tech Policy Press - September 29th, 2022
- Alex Jones' defamation trials show deplatforming's limits : NPR - September 21st, 2022
- Judges ruling against Twitter to protect the First Amendment did the opposite - MSNBC - September 21st, 2022
- Libs of TikTok vs. The Washington Post - Idaho State Journal - September 13th, 2022
- Journalist Glenn Greenwald scorches unholy alliance of government Democrats, corporate media and Big Tech - Fox News - September 13th, 2022
- Deplatforming Andrew Tate is the best way to deal with him - Los Angeles Loyolan - September 5th, 2022
- Andrew Tate joins Rumble after Big Tech deplatforming, will post ... - August 28th, 2022
- Pro-Masculine Influencer Andrew Tate Joins Rumble After Big Tech ... - August 28th, 2022
- NBC Journalist Who Attacked Libs Of TikTok Once Took Credit For ... - August 28th, 2022
- Web3 Will Make Or Break Social Media - Forbes - August 28th, 2022
- 2022 Tech Trends | The Future Today Institute - August 20th, 2022
- Commentary: Twitter fast becoming a thought-policed sandbox - The Herald Journal - August 20th, 2022
- What the Trial of Alex Jones Revealed About His Finances - The New York Times - August 12th, 2022
- Big Tech's Ban on Alex Jones Fans the Flames of His Conspiracy Theories - Reason - August 4th, 2022
- A New Cloud Company Looking to Disrupt The Old Order - Digital Journal - August 4th, 2022
- Nazis try to get on the ballot in Massachusetts - but may not have collected enough signatures - Universal Hub - August 4th, 2022
- Meme Creators Want Instagram To Change Its Content Moderation Policies And Stop Deplatforming Them - BuzzFeed News - July 26th, 2022
- Alexs War: A film about the de-platformed conspiracy theorist hits iTunes July 29 - BGR - July 26th, 2022
- Dozens of States Are Jumping on the Social Media Censorship Bandwagon - Gizmodo - July 26th, 2022
- What is Mike Lees TEAM Act and how would it reform Big Tech? | Opinion - Deseret News - July 18th, 2022
- Amid fears of election subversion, DeSantis' handpicked secretary of state will oversee his race - Salon - July 18th, 2022
- Internal Twitter messages show employees targeting Libs of TikTok ... - July 9th, 2022
- Leaked internal messages show Twitter employees debating whether to ban us - July 9th, 2022
- Trump Appeals Dismissal Of Preposterous Suit Against Twitter For Tortious Deplatforming - Above the Law - June 29th, 2022
- Loud music and take-out alcohol. Here are all the new Florida laws going into effect - WKMG News 6 & ClickOrlando - June 29th, 2022
- Study suggests identity advancement plays a key role in the downplaying of Trump's unethical behaviors - PsyPost - June 29th, 2022
- Yes, Elon, There is a Better Way. - International Policy Digest - June 10th, 2022
- Crypto Is An Invaluable Tool In The Fight Against Financial Oppression - - FinanceFeeds - May 25th, 2022
- Law's Jessie Hill discussed the legality of social media "deplatforming" - The Daily | Case Western Reserve University - May 11th, 2022
- Court Dropkicks Trump Twitter LOLsuit For THAT'S NOT HOW ANY OF THIS WORKS - Above the Law - May 11th, 2022
- Commentary: Is Ron DeSantis the Trump of the future? - Palm Beach Post - May 11th, 2022
- Jesus, endless war and the irresistible rise of American fascism - Salon - May 11th, 2022
- Who did Twitter ban during the Trump era, and why? - Los Angeles Times - April 28th, 2022
- The Unholy Alliance Between the US Security Apparatus and Big Tech - Fair Observer - April 28th, 2022
- Jimmy Kimmel Weighs-in on Not De-Platforming Joe Rogan: Its Not as Black and White as Sometimes the Media Makes It Out to Be - EssentiallySports - April 28th, 2022
- 'More tears and tantrums on Twitter are guaranteed' - The Week UK - April 28th, 2022
- Social media has a serious disinformation problem. But it can be fixed - The Indian Express - April 13th, 2022
- Social media company Minds and Daryl Davis tell Joe Rogan ... - April 13th, 2022