Many conservatives have decried Section 230 for limiting their ability to restrict apps from content moderation, but any change in the law could have unexpected consequences for the billions of accounts across social media.Photo: TY Lim (Shutterstock)
On Monday, the Supreme Court announced nine cases it intends to hear in its upcoming term, includingRenaldo Gonzalez v. Google.The case directly questions the protections afforded by Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which limits the legal liability of online web hosts for the content posted by their users. That law has essentially defined what users currently understand about the internet and has served as the main shield against lawsuits for social media companies against lawmakers and citizens. Lawyers for Google have said changes in the provisions of Section 230 could threaten the basic organizational decisions of the modern internet.
The case goes back to 2015, when Nohemi Gonzalez, a U.S. citizen living Paris, was shot and killed alongside 130 other people during a terror attack carried out by members of the Islamic State. The family of Gonzalez sued Google and said the company promoted ISIS-centric content, spreading the militant groups message and helping them radicalize and recruit new members. The Supreme Court has also agreed to hear a similar case tied to an appeal from Twitter, Google, and the Meta-owned Facebook, where each faces claims they failed to remove IS-related materials from their platforms.
At the heart of Gonzalez is the question of whether 230 still shields tech companies and websites when they algorithmically recommend content, specifically third-party content to a users feed. Social media apps content recommendations are a cornerstone of how the largest tech companies operate, but the case could pin responsibility for recommended user content on those companies, completely upend the current ways most companies do business.
SCOTUS had declined to hear a separate but similar case revolving around Section 230, but the nations top court often hears cases when theres disagreement in lower courts. As noted in the original petition, five appeals court judges have said that 230 creates immunity for cases involving recommended content, while three have argued to varying degrees that it doesnt.
[Internet companies] constantly direct such recommendations, in one form or another, at virtually every adult and child in the United States who uses social media, Gonzalezs attorneys argue in the original April appeal. Application of section 230 to such recommendations removes all civil liability incentives for interactive computer services to eschew recommending such harmful materials, and denies redress to victims who could have shown that those recommendations had caused their injuries, or the deaths of their loved ones.
But lawyers for Google have argued that the company regularly takes down flagged videos, and that the Paris attacker just happened to be active on YouTube and once appeared in an IS propaganda video. The company said its multiple recommendation widgets are the best way to help users navigate the vast amount of data online.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas previously said about Section 230: We should consider whether the text of this increasingly important statue aligns with the current state of immunity enjoyed by internet platforms.
Conservatives and liberals alike have both attacked Section 230, though for very different reasons. California has passed a bill designed to protect kids under 18 from tech companies ongoing data collection. Some pro-tech groups have said such a bill could infringe against 230, though other bills put out by Republican-controlled states are much more explicit in their antagonism toward websites speech immunity.
At the same time Gonzalez is heading for a final showdown in the Supreme Court, conservatives in Texas and Florida are putting much of their anti-big tech initiative behind bills meant to restrict social media companies from banning accounts or moderating user content.
Floridas anti-deplatforming law, put on hold by the courts in 2021, was shot down by the 11th circuit court earlier this year.Last month, trade groups representing big tech and the Florida AG petitioned for a case regarding the bill to be heard by SCOTUS. On Sept. 23, Floridas Attorney General Ashley Moody submitted an appeal to the Supreme Court, arguing in a 111-page document that online spaces are the modern town square and that these social media companies are censoring content that could be considered political speech necessary for the marketplace of ideas.
Of course, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has had difficulty himself with social media. His aides have been banned from Twitter for asking supporters to drag a journalist who covered the presidential hopeful.
Another bill, Texas H.B. 20, recently found new life after the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decided platforms want to eliminate speechnot promote or protect it. This is a common right-wing talking point that several legal scholars and tech company trade groups told Gizmodo is meant to have a chilling effect on techs ability to moderate hate speech or cut down on disinformation online. Texas had previously put the matter up to the Supreme Court, but in a 5-4 decision the justices put a hold on the bill and sent it back down to the lower courts. Floridas appeal directly referenced the Texas decision to extol the merits of its own anti-content moderation bill.
Both Florida and Texas loose definitions of content moderation and their interpretations of Section 230 could have ramifications far beyond social media companies, as pointed out by Corbin Barthold, internet policy counsel for TechFreedom, a tech-minded free enterprise think tank. The law effectively targets any platform with more than 50 million active users, which could even include sites like Wikipedia.
The question of so-called censorship in both the Florida and Texas laws has come down to interpreting the 1985 case Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, which required companies to disclose information about their services. In a phone interview, Barthold told Gizmodo that up until now, every time SCOTUS has referenced Zauderer, justices have limited the scope of the ruling to speech in advertising, but without firm precedent lower courts have used the case for other forms of speech.
And because the 5th and 11th circuit courts have disagreed so heavily, Barthold said the Supreme Court will likely need to bring up this case as well. Whatever the court decides next on Section 230 will likely have a vast impact on any future decision regarding social media companies liability for the posts that appear on their webpages and whether deleting any of those posts would be considered censorship.
If a company like Twitter suddenly finds that it is held liable for each post on its site, the company says that its options would become limited to either folding entirely or conducting extreme amounts vetting and content moderation, much more than already goes on. This, of course, isnt exactly what conservatives want. Many, like Colorado Rep. Laura Boebertwho has been previously banned from Twitter for posting disinformationmuch prefer it if social media companies were completely restricted from holding on to the ban hammer.
Original post:
Supreme Court Is Putting the Future of Section 230 Protections on Its Docket - Gizmodo
- Judge blocks Texas bill aimed at preventing social media companies from deplatforming people based on their ... - AOL - February 25th, 2024
- Introducing FIRE's Campus Deplatforming Database | The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - Foundation for Individual Rights in Education - February 9th, 2024
- Alex Jones To Tucker Carlson: My Sin Was Decompartmentalizing The American Population - RealClearPolitics - December 11th, 2023
- Does 'deplatforming' work to curb hate speech and calls for ... - October 16th, 2023
- Weighing the Value and Risks of Deplatforming GNET - October 16th, 2023
- TIMELINE: Trump reinstated from 'permanent' social media bans, but will that last? - WCYB - March 31st, 2023
- Twitter Found Trump Didn't Violate Policy, But Banned Him Anyway - December 28th, 2022
- Social media misogyny: The new way Andrew Tate brought us the same old hate - December 28th, 2022
- Google Pays Sharath Bulusu: Well-meaning regulation will help market mature - The Indian Express - December 28th, 2022
- WordPress discussed deplatforming The New York Post after Hunter Biden ... - December 20th, 2022
- App Store 'Gatekeepers' Urged To Deplatform "Dangerous" Twitter Itself - December 12th, 2022
- FACT CHECK: Did Elon Musk Call Twitter Users Upset By Trumps ... - December 12th, 2022
- 'Deplatforming the President': Twitter Files Part 3 reveals events that led to removal of Donald Trump - Business Today - December 12th, 2022
- Twitter Files Part 2: Top Twitter execs interfered with US election before banning Donald Trump - msnNOW - December 12th, 2022
- Conservatives Are Mad Kanye Is Being Censored for Antisemitism ... - November 25th, 2022
- Chronicles Magazine : A Magazine of American Culture - November 17th, 2022
- Amazon accused of absurd and unacceptable censorship after book ... - November 17th, 2022
- PayPal's ideological deplatforming spurs proposed UK amendment to stop ... - November 17th, 2022
- Andrew Tates popularity decreases following deplatforming from social ... - November 7th, 2022
- This is for people who think deplatforming doesn't work - November 7th, 2022
- 4 Great Email Templates For Leaving Your Job - Jobbio Journal - October 31st, 2022
- What is Social Media? - TechTarget - October 31st, 2022
- The dangers of deplatforming - October 31st, 2022
- A Middlebury College Expert Explains the Ways Social Media Fuels Hate and How to Stop It - Seven Days - October 23rd, 2022
- Alex Jones ordered to pay $965 million after misinformation campaign targeting Sandy Hook families - Yahoo Finance - October 15th, 2022
- Kanye West Bank Ban Is An Indefensible Slippery Slope - OutKick - October 15th, 2022
- My New Paper: Donald Trump Should Remain Deplatformed from Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube Despite the High Bar That Platforms Should Apply to the... - October 15th, 2022
- As Washington Post targets Catholic hospitals, every religious institution needs to build defenses - Washington Examiner - October 15th, 2022
- TMCs Derek OBrien steps in to give legitimacy to The Wires Meta joke that turned out to be a hoax - OpIndia - October 15th, 2022
- LeBron James' The Shop Will Not Air Episode Featuring Kanye West After Controversial Remarks By The Rapper - Yardbarker - October 15th, 2022
- Verizon Blacklists One America News Network Following ... - Breitbart - October 7th, 2022
- Conference aims to make trust and safety hot topics in computer science - The Stanford Daily - October 7th, 2022
- Sneako: Andrew Tate 2.0 Has Been Kicked Off YouTube | 2022 - The Latch - October 7th, 2022
- An Early Conservative Victory in the War on Big Tech | Opinion - Newsweek - October 7th, 2022
- Students respond to upcoming Congress to Campus event - Macalester College The Mac Weekly - October 7th, 2022
- How to fundraise when the powerful want to stop you - Open Democracy - October 7th, 2022
- Piers Morgan Has Just Grilled Andrew Tate in a Live TV Interview - We Got This Covered - October 7th, 2022
- Kiwi Farms Is Down After Cloudflare Boots the Site as a Customer - September 29th, 2022
- How two Republicans in Florida are dominating the news - POLITICO - September 29th, 2022
- "White Psychodrama" and the culture wars: A self-reinforcing cycle, going nowhere - Salon - September 29th, 2022
- Regulating Misinformation on Twitter is a Problem, But There Are Bigger Ones on the Horizon - Tech Policy Press - September 29th, 2022
- It's Time to Stop Platforming the Big Lie Playbook - Tech Policy Press - September 29th, 2022
- Alex Jones' defamation trials show deplatforming's limits : NPR - September 21st, 2022
- Judges ruling against Twitter to protect the First Amendment did the opposite - MSNBC - September 21st, 2022
- Libs of TikTok vs. The Washington Post - Idaho State Journal - September 13th, 2022
- Journalist Glenn Greenwald scorches unholy alliance of government Democrats, corporate media and Big Tech - Fox News - September 13th, 2022
- Deplatforming Andrew Tate is the best way to deal with him - Los Angeles Loyolan - September 5th, 2022
- Andrew Tate joins Rumble after Big Tech deplatforming, will post ... - August 28th, 2022
- Pro-Masculine Influencer Andrew Tate Joins Rumble After Big Tech ... - August 28th, 2022
- NBC Journalist Who Attacked Libs Of TikTok Once Took Credit For ... - August 28th, 2022
- Web3 Will Make Or Break Social Media - Forbes - August 28th, 2022
- 2022 Tech Trends | The Future Today Institute - August 20th, 2022
- Commentary: Twitter fast becoming a thought-policed sandbox - The Herald Journal - August 20th, 2022
- What the Trial of Alex Jones Revealed About His Finances - The New York Times - August 12th, 2022
- Big Tech's Ban on Alex Jones Fans the Flames of His Conspiracy Theories - Reason - August 4th, 2022
- A New Cloud Company Looking to Disrupt The Old Order - Digital Journal - August 4th, 2022
- Nazis try to get on the ballot in Massachusetts - but may not have collected enough signatures - Universal Hub - August 4th, 2022
- Meme Creators Want Instagram To Change Its Content Moderation Policies And Stop Deplatforming Them - BuzzFeed News - July 26th, 2022
- Alexs War: A film about the de-platformed conspiracy theorist hits iTunes July 29 - BGR - July 26th, 2022
- Dozens of States Are Jumping on the Social Media Censorship Bandwagon - Gizmodo - July 26th, 2022
- What is Mike Lees TEAM Act and how would it reform Big Tech? | Opinion - Deseret News - July 18th, 2022
- Amid fears of election subversion, DeSantis' handpicked secretary of state will oversee his race - Salon - July 18th, 2022
- Internal Twitter messages show employees targeting Libs of TikTok ... - July 9th, 2022
- Leaked internal messages show Twitter employees debating whether to ban us - July 9th, 2022
- Trump Appeals Dismissal Of Preposterous Suit Against Twitter For Tortious Deplatforming - Above the Law - June 29th, 2022
- Loud music and take-out alcohol. Here are all the new Florida laws going into effect - WKMG News 6 & ClickOrlando - June 29th, 2022
- Study suggests identity advancement plays a key role in the downplaying of Trump's unethical behaviors - PsyPost - June 29th, 2022
- The brewing fight to keep abortion info online - The Verge - June 29th, 2022
- Yes, Elon, There is a Better Way. - International Policy Digest - June 10th, 2022
- Crypto Is An Invaluable Tool In The Fight Against Financial Oppression - - FinanceFeeds - May 25th, 2022
- Law's Jessie Hill discussed the legality of social media "deplatforming" - The Daily | Case Western Reserve University - May 11th, 2022
- Court Dropkicks Trump Twitter LOLsuit For THAT'S NOT HOW ANY OF THIS WORKS - Above the Law - May 11th, 2022
- Commentary: Is Ron DeSantis the Trump of the future? - Palm Beach Post - May 11th, 2022
- Jesus, endless war and the irresistible rise of American fascism - Salon - May 11th, 2022
- Who did Twitter ban during the Trump era, and why? - Los Angeles Times - April 28th, 2022
- The Unholy Alliance Between the US Security Apparatus and Big Tech - Fair Observer - April 28th, 2022
- Jimmy Kimmel Weighs-in on Not De-Platforming Joe Rogan: Its Not as Black and White as Sometimes the Media Makes It Out to Be - EssentiallySports - April 28th, 2022
- 'More tears and tantrums on Twitter are guaranteed' - The Week UK - April 28th, 2022
- Social media has a serious disinformation problem. But it can be fixed - The Indian Express - April 13th, 2022
- Social media company Minds and Daryl Davis tell Joe Rogan ... - April 13th, 2022