In the wake of the assault on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, Twitter permanently suspended Donald Trumps personal account, and Google, Apple and Amazon shunned Parler, which at least temporarily shut down the social media platform favored by the far right.
Dubbed deplatforming, these actions restrict the ability of individuals and communities to communicate with each other and the public. Deplatforming raises ethical and legal questions, but foremost is the question of whether its an effective strategy to reduce hate speech and calls for violence on social media.
The Conversation U.S. asked three experts in online communications whether deplatforming works and what happens when technology companies attempt it.
Jeremy Blackburn, assistant professor of computer science, Binghamton University
The question of how effective deplatforming is can be looked at from two different angles: Does it work from a technical standpoint, and does it have an effect on worrisome communities themselves?
Does deplatforming work from a technical perspective?
Gab was the first major platform subject to deplatforming efforts, first with removal from app stores and, after the Tree of Life shooting, the withdrawal of cloud infrastructure providers, domain name providers and other Web-related services. Before the shooting, my colleagues and I showed in a study that Gab was an alt-right echo chamber with worrisome trends of hateful content. Although Gab was deplatformed, it managed to survive by shifting to decentralized technologies and has shown a degree of innovation for example, developing the moderation-circumventing Dissenter browser.
From a technical perspective, deplatforming just makes things a bit harder. Amazons cloud services make it easy to manage computing infrastructure but are ultimately built on open source technologies available to anyone. A deplatformed company or people sympathetic to it could build their own hosting infrastructure. The research community has also built censorship-resistant tools that, if all else fails, harmful online communities can use to persist.
Does deplatforming have an effect on worrisome communities themselves?
Whether or not deplatforming has a social effect is a nuanced question just now beginning to be addressed by the research community. There is evidence that a platform banning communities and content for example, QAnon or certain politicians can have a positive effect. Platform banning can reduce growth of new users over time, and there is less content produced overall. On the other hand, migrations do happen, and this is often a response to real world events for example, a deplatformed personality who migrates to a new platform can trigger an influx of new users.
Another consequence of deplatforming can be users in the migrated community showing signs of becoming more radicalized over time. While Reddit or Twitter might improve with the loss of problematic users, deplatforming can have unintended consequences that can accelerate the problematic behavior that led to deplatforming in the first place.
Ultimately, its unlikely that deplatforming, while certainly easy to implement and effective to some extent, will be a long-term solution in and of itself. Moving forward, effective approaches will need to take into account the complicated technological and social consequences of addressing the root problem of extremist and violent Web communities.
Ugochukwu Etudo, assistant professor of operations and information management, University of Connecticut
Does the deplatforming of prominent figures and movement leaders who command large followings online work? That depends on the criteria for the success of the policy intervention. If it means punishing the target of the deplatforming so they pay some price, then without a doubt it works. For example, right-wing provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos was banned from Twitter in 2016 and Facebook in 2019, and subsequently complained about financial hardship.
If it means dampening the odds of undesirable social outcomes and unrest, then in the short term, yes. But it is not at all certain in the long term. In the short term, deplatforming serves as a shock or disorienting perturbation to a network of people who are being influenced by the target of the deplatforming. This disorientation can weaken the movement, at least initially.
However, there is a risk that deplatforming can delegitimize authoritative sources of information in the eyes of a movements followers, and remaining adherents can become even more ardent. Movement leaders can reframe deplatforming as censorship and further proof of a mainstream bias.
There is reason to be concerned about the possibility that driving people who engage in harmful online behavior into the shadows further entrenches them in online environments that affirm their biases. Far-right groups and personalities have established a considerable presence on privacy-focused online platforms, including the messaging platform Telegram. This migration is concerning because researchers have known for some time that complete online anonymity is associated with increased harmful behavior online.
In deplatforming policymaking, among other considerations, there should be an emphasis on justice, harm reduction and rehabilitation. Policy objectives should be defined transparently and with reasonable expectations in order to avoid some of these negative unintended consequences.
Robert Gehl, associate professor of communication and media studies, Louisiana Tech University
Deplatforming not only works, I believe it needs to be built into the system. Social media should have mechanisms by which racist, fascist, misogynist or transphobic speakers are removed, where misinformation is removed, and where there is no way to pay to have your messages amplified. And the decision to deplatform someone should be decided as close to democratically as is possible, rather than in some closed boardroom or opaque content moderation committee like Facebooks Supreme Court.
In other words, the answer is alternative social media like Mastodon. As a federated system, Mastodon is specifically designed to give users and administrators the ability to mute, block or even remove not just misbehaving users but entire parts of the network.
For example, despite fears that the alt-right network Gab would somehow take over the Mastodon federation, Mastodon administrators quickly marginalized Gab. The same thing is happening as I write with new racist and misogynistic networks forming to fill the potential void left by Parler. And Mastodon nodes have also prevented spam and advertising from spreading across the network.
Moreover, the decision to block parts of the network arent made in secret. Theyre done by local administrators, who announce their decisions publicly and are answerable to the members of their node in the network. Im on scholar.social, an academic-oriented Mastodon node, and if I dont like a decision the local administrator makes, I can contact the administrator directly and discuss it. There are other distributed social media system, as well, including Diaspora and Twister.
The danger of mainstream, corporate social media is that it was built to do exactly the opposite of what alternatives like Mastodon do: grow at all costs, including the cost of harming democratic deliberation. Its not just cute cats that draw attention but conspiracy theories, misinformation and the stoking of bigotry. Corporate social media tolerates these things as long as theyre profitable and, it turns out, that tolerance has lasted far too long.
[Deep knowledge, daily. Sign up for The Conversations newsletter.]
See the original post here:
Does 'deplatforming' work to curb hate speech and calls for ...
- Judge blocks Texas bill aimed at preventing social media companies from deplatforming people based on their ... - AOL - February 25th, 2024
- Introducing FIRE's Campus Deplatforming Database | The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - Foundation for Individual Rights in Education - February 9th, 2024
- Alex Jones To Tucker Carlson: My Sin Was Decompartmentalizing The American Population - RealClearPolitics - December 11th, 2023
- Weighing the Value and Risks of Deplatforming GNET - October 16th, 2023
- TIMELINE: Trump reinstated from 'permanent' social media bans, but will that last? - WCYB - March 31st, 2023
- Twitter Found Trump Didn't Violate Policy, But Banned Him Anyway - December 28th, 2022
- Social media misogyny: The new way Andrew Tate brought us the same old hate - December 28th, 2022
- Google Pays Sharath Bulusu: Well-meaning regulation will help market mature - The Indian Express - December 28th, 2022
- WordPress discussed deplatforming The New York Post after Hunter Biden ... - December 20th, 2022
- App Store 'Gatekeepers' Urged To Deplatform "Dangerous" Twitter Itself - December 12th, 2022
- FACT CHECK: Did Elon Musk Call Twitter Users Upset By Trumps ... - December 12th, 2022
- 'Deplatforming the President': Twitter Files Part 3 reveals events that led to removal of Donald Trump - Business Today - December 12th, 2022
- Twitter Files Part 2: Top Twitter execs interfered with US election before banning Donald Trump - msnNOW - December 12th, 2022
- Conservatives Are Mad Kanye Is Being Censored for Antisemitism ... - November 25th, 2022
- Chronicles Magazine : A Magazine of American Culture - November 17th, 2022
- Amazon accused of absurd and unacceptable censorship after book ... - November 17th, 2022
- PayPal's ideological deplatforming spurs proposed UK amendment to stop ... - November 17th, 2022
- Andrew Tates popularity decreases following deplatforming from social ... - November 7th, 2022
- This is for people who think deplatforming doesn't work - November 7th, 2022
- 4 Great Email Templates For Leaving Your Job - Jobbio Journal - October 31st, 2022
- What is Social Media? - TechTarget - October 31st, 2022
- The dangers of deplatforming - October 31st, 2022
- A Middlebury College Expert Explains the Ways Social Media Fuels Hate and How to Stop It - Seven Days - October 23rd, 2022
- Alex Jones ordered to pay $965 million after misinformation campaign targeting Sandy Hook families - Yahoo Finance - October 15th, 2022
- Kanye West Bank Ban Is An Indefensible Slippery Slope - OutKick - October 15th, 2022
- My New Paper: Donald Trump Should Remain Deplatformed from Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube Despite the High Bar That Platforms Should Apply to the... - October 15th, 2022
- As Washington Post targets Catholic hospitals, every religious institution needs to build defenses - Washington Examiner - October 15th, 2022
- TMCs Derek OBrien steps in to give legitimacy to The Wires Meta joke that turned out to be a hoax - OpIndia - October 15th, 2022
- LeBron James' The Shop Will Not Air Episode Featuring Kanye West After Controversial Remarks By The Rapper - Yardbarker - October 15th, 2022
- Verizon Blacklists One America News Network Following ... - Breitbart - October 7th, 2022
- Conference aims to make trust and safety hot topics in computer science - The Stanford Daily - October 7th, 2022
- Sneako: Andrew Tate 2.0 Has Been Kicked Off YouTube | 2022 - The Latch - October 7th, 2022
- An Early Conservative Victory in the War on Big Tech | Opinion - Newsweek - October 7th, 2022
- Students respond to upcoming Congress to Campus event - Macalester College The Mac Weekly - October 7th, 2022
- Supreme Court Is Putting the Future of Section 230 Protections on Its Docket - Gizmodo - October 7th, 2022
- How to fundraise when the powerful want to stop you - Open Democracy - October 7th, 2022
- Piers Morgan Has Just Grilled Andrew Tate in a Live TV Interview - We Got This Covered - October 7th, 2022
- Kiwi Farms Is Down After Cloudflare Boots the Site as a Customer - September 29th, 2022
- How two Republicans in Florida are dominating the news - POLITICO - September 29th, 2022
- "White Psychodrama" and the culture wars: A self-reinforcing cycle, going nowhere - Salon - September 29th, 2022
- Regulating Misinformation on Twitter is a Problem, But There Are Bigger Ones on the Horizon - Tech Policy Press - September 29th, 2022
- It's Time to Stop Platforming the Big Lie Playbook - Tech Policy Press - September 29th, 2022
- Alex Jones' defamation trials show deplatforming's limits : NPR - September 21st, 2022
- Judges ruling against Twitter to protect the First Amendment did the opposite - MSNBC - September 21st, 2022
- Libs of TikTok vs. The Washington Post - Idaho State Journal - September 13th, 2022
- Journalist Glenn Greenwald scorches unholy alliance of government Democrats, corporate media and Big Tech - Fox News - September 13th, 2022
- Deplatforming Andrew Tate is the best way to deal with him - Los Angeles Loyolan - September 5th, 2022
- Andrew Tate joins Rumble after Big Tech deplatforming, will post ... - August 28th, 2022
- Pro-Masculine Influencer Andrew Tate Joins Rumble After Big Tech ... - August 28th, 2022
- NBC Journalist Who Attacked Libs Of TikTok Once Took Credit For ... - August 28th, 2022
- Web3 Will Make Or Break Social Media - Forbes - August 28th, 2022
- 2022 Tech Trends | The Future Today Institute - August 20th, 2022
- Commentary: Twitter fast becoming a thought-policed sandbox - The Herald Journal - August 20th, 2022
- What the Trial of Alex Jones Revealed About His Finances - The New York Times - August 12th, 2022
- Big Tech's Ban on Alex Jones Fans the Flames of His Conspiracy Theories - Reason - August 4th, 2022
- A New Cloud Company Looking to Disrupt The Old Order - Digital Journal - August 4th, 2022
- Nazis try to get on the ballot in Massachusetts - but may not have collected enough signatures - Universal Hub - August 4th, 2022
- Meme Creators Want Instagram To Change Its Content Moderation Policies And Stop Deplatforming Them - BuzzFeed News - July 26th, 2022
- Alexs War: A film about the de-platformed conspiracy theorist hits iTunes July 29 - BGR - July 26th, 2022
- Dozens of States Are Jumping on the Social Media Censorship Bandwagon - Gizmodo - July 26th, 2022
- What is Mike Lees TEAM Act and how would it reform Big Tech? | Opinion - Deseret News - July 18th, 2022
- Amid fears of election subversion, DeSantis' handpicked secretary of state will oversee his race - Salon - July 18th, 2022
- Internal Twitter messages show employees targeting Libs of TikTok ... - July 9th, 2022
- Leaked internal messages show Twitter employees debating whether to ban us - July 9th, 2022
- Trump Appeals Dismissal Of Preposterous Suit Against Twitter For Tortious Deplatforming - Above the Law - June 29th, 2022
- Loud music and take-out alcohol. Here are all the new Florida laws going into effect - WKMG News 6 & ClickOrlando - June 29th, 2022
- Study suggests identity advancement plays a key role in the downplaying of Trump's unethical behaviors - PsyPost - June 29th, 2022
- The brewing fight to keep abortion info online - The Verge - June 29th, 2022
- Yes, Elon, There is a Better Way. - International Policy Digest - June 10th, 2022
- Crypto Is An Invaluable Tool In The Fight Against Financial Oppression - - FinanceFeeds - May 25th, 2022
- Law's Jessie Hill discussed the legality of social media "deplatforming" - The Daily | Case Western Reserve University - May 11th, 2022
- Court Dropkicks Trump Twitter LOLsuit For THAT'S NOT HOW ANY OF THIS WORKS - Above the Law - May 11th, 2022
- Commentary: Is Ron DeSantis the Trump of the future? - Palm Beach Post - May 11th, 2022
- Jesus, endless war and the irresistible rise of American fascism - Salon - May 11th, 2022
- Who did Twitter ban during the Trump era, and why? - Los Angeles Times - April 28th, 2022
- The Unholy Alliance Between the US Security Apparatus and Big Tech - Fair Observer - April 28th, 2022
- Jimmy Kimmel Weighs-in on Not De-Platforming Joe Rogan: Its Not as Black and White as Sometimes the Media Makes It Out to Be - EssentiallySports - April 28th, 2022
- 'More tears and tantrums on Twitter are guaranteed' - The Week UK - April 28th, 2022
- Social media has a serious disinformation problem. But it can be fixed - The Indian Express - April 13th, 2022
- Social media company Minds and Daryl Davis tell Joe Rogan ... - April 13th, 2022