WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange Faces New Indictment In U …

WASHINGTON (AP) WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange sought to recruit hackers at conferences in Europe and Asia who could provide his anti-secrecy website with classified information, and conspired with members of hacking organizations, according to a new Justice Department indictment announced Wednesday.

The superseding indictment does not contain additional charges beyond the 18 counts the Justice Department unsealed last year. But prosecutors say it underscores Assanges efforts to procure and release classified information, allegations that form the basis of criminal charges he already faces.

Beyond recruiting hackers at conferences, the indictment accuses Assange of conspiring with members of hacking groups known as LulzSec and Anonymous. He also worked with a 17-year-old hacker who gave him information stolen from a bank and directed the teenager to steal additional material, including audio recordings of high-ranking government officials, prosecutors say.

Assanges lawyer, Barry Pollack, said in a statement that the governments relentless pursuit of Julian Assange poses a grave threat to journalists everywhere and to the publics right to know.

While todays superseding indictment is yet another chapter in the U.S. Governments effort to persuade the public that its pursuit of Julian Assange is based on something other than his publication of newsworthy truthful information, he added, the indictment continues to charge him with violating the Espionage Act based on WikiLeaks publications exposing war crimes committed by the U.S. Government.

Assange was arrested last year after being evicted from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where he had sought refuge to avoid being sent to Sweden over allegations of rape and sexual assault, and is at the center of an extradition tussle over whether he should be sent to the United States.

The Justice Department has already charged him with conspiring with former U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning in one of the largest compromises of classified information in U.S. history by working together to crack a password to a government computer.

Prosecutors say the WikiLeaks founder damaged national security by publishing hundreds of thousands of classified documents, including diplomatic cables and military files on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, that harmed the U.S. and its allies and aided its adversaries.

Assange maintains he was acting as a journalist entitled to First Amendment protection. His lawyers have argued the U.S. charges of espionage and computer misuse were politically motivated and an abuse of power.

Assange generated substantial attention during the 2016 presidential election, and in investigations that followed, after WikiLeaks published stolen Democratic emails that U.S. authorities say were hacked by Russian military intelligence officials. An investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller revealed how Trump campaign associates eagerly anticipated the email disclosures. One Trump ally, Roger Stone, was found guilty last year of lying about his efforts to gain inside information about the emails. Assange, however, was never charged in Muellers Russia investigation.

The allegations in the new indictment center on conferences, in locations including the Netherlands and Malaysia in 2009, at which prosecutors say he and a WikiLeaks associate sought to recruit hackers who could locate classified information, including material on a Most Wanted Leaks list posted on WikiLeaks website.

According to the new indictment, he told would-be recruits that unless they were a member of the U.S. military, they faced no legal liability for stealing classified information and giving it to WikiLeaks because TOP SECRET meant nothing as a matter of law.

At one conference in Malaysia, called the Hack in the Box Security Conference, Assange told the audience, I was a famous teenage hacker in Australia, and Ive been reading generals emails since I was 17.

Calling all HuffPost superfans!

Sign up for membership to become a founding member and help shape HuffPost's next chapter

See the rest here:

WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange Faces New Indictment In U ...

Ask Hackaday: Why Did GitHub Ship All Our Software Off To The Arctic? – Hackaday

If youve logged onto GitHub recently and youre an active user, you might have noticed a new badge on your profile: Arctic Code Vault Contributor. Sounds pretty awesome right? But whose code got archived in this vault, how is it being stored, and whats the point?

On February 2nd, GitHub took a snapshot of every public repository that met one of the following criteria:

Then they traveled to Svalbard, found a decommissioned coal mine, and archived the code in deep storage underground but not before they made a very cinematic video about it.

For the combination of longevity, price and density, GitHub chose film storage, provided by piql.

Theres nothing too remarkable about the storage medium: the tarball of each repository is encoded on standard silver halide film as a 2d barcode, which is distributed across frames of 8.8 million pixels each (roughly 4K). Whilst officially rated for 500, the film should last at least 1000 years.

You might imagine that all of GitHubs public repositories would take up a lot of space when stored on film, but the data turns out to only be 21TB when compressed this means the whole archive fits comfortably in a shipping container.

Each reel starts with slides containing an un-encoded human readable text guide in multiple languages, explaining to future humanity how the archive works. If you have five minutes, reading the guide and how GitHub explains the archive to whoever discovers it is good fun. Its interesting to see the range of future knowledge the guide caters to it starts by explaining in very basic terms what computers and software are, despite the fact that de-compression software would be required to use any of the archive. To bridge this gap, they are also providing a Tech Tree, a comprehensive guide to modern software, compilation, encoding, compression etc. Interestingly, whilst the introductory guide is open source, the Tech Tree does not appear to be.

But the question bigger than how GitHub did it is why did they do it?

The mission of the GitHub Archive Program is to preserve open source software for future generations.

GitHub talks about two reasons for preserving software like this: historical curiosity and disaster. Lets talk about historical curiosity first.

There is an argument that preserving software is essential to preserving our cultural heritage. This is an easily bought argument, as even if youre in the camp that believes theres nothing artistic about a bunch of ones and zeros, it cant be denied that software is a platform and medium for an incredibly diverse amount of modern culture.

GitHub also cites past examples of important technical information being lost to history, such as the search for the blueprints of the Saturn V, or the discovery of the Roman mortar which built the Pantheon. But data storage, backup, and networks have evolved significantly since Saturn Vs blueprints were produced. Today people frequently quip, once its on the internet, its there forever. What do you reckon? Do you think the argument that software (or rather, the subset of software which lives in public GitHub repos) could be easily lost in 2020+ is valid?

Whatever your opinion, simply preserving open source software on long timescales is already being done by many other organisations. And it doesnt require an arctic bunker. For that we have to consider GitHubs second motive: a large scale disaster.

We cant predict what apocalyptic disasters the future may bring thats sort of the point. But if humanity gets into a fix, would a code vault be useful?

Firstly, lets get something straight: in order for us to need to use a code archive buried deep in Svalbard, something needs to have gone really, really, wrong. Wrong enough that things like softwareheritage.org, Wayback Machine, and countless other conventional backups arent working. So this would be a disaster that has wiped out the majority of our digital infrastructure, including worldwide redundancy backups and networks, requiring us to rebuild things from the ground up.

This begs the question: if we were to rebuild our digital world, would we make a carbon copy of what already exists, or would we rebuild from scratch? There are two sides to this coin: could we rebuild our existing systems, and would we want to rebuild our existing systems.

Tackling the former first: modern software is built upon many, many layers of abstraction. In a post-apocalyptic world, would we even be able to use much of the software with our infrastructure/lower-level services wiped out? To take a random, perhaps tenuous example, say we had to rebuild our networks, DNS, ISPs, etc. from scratch. Inevitably behavior would be different, nodes and information missing, and so software built on layers above this might be unstable or insecure. To take more concrete examples, this problem is greatest where open-source software relies on closed-source infrastructure AWS, 3rd party APIs, and even low-level chip designs that might not have survived the disaster. Could we reimplement existing software stably on top of re-hashed solutions?

The latter point would we want to rebuild our software as it is now is more subjective. I have no doubt every Hackaday reader has one or two things they might change about, well, almost everything but cant due to existing infrastructure and legacy systems. Would the opportunity to rebuild modern systems be able to win out over the time cost of doing so?

Finally, you may have noticed that software is evolving rather quickly. Being a web developer today who is familiar with all the major technologies in use looks pretty different from the same role 5 years ago. So does archiving a static snapshot of code make sense given how quickly it would be out of date? Some would argue that throwing around numbers like 500 to 1000 years is pretty meaningless for reuse if the software landscape has completely changed within 50. If an apocalypse were to occur today, would we want to rebuild our world using code from the 80s?

Even if we werent to directly reuse the archived code to rebuild our world, there are still plenty of reasons it might be handy when doing so, such as referring to the logic implemented within it, or the architecture, data structures and so on. But these are just my thoughts, and I want to hear yours.

The thought that there is a vault in the Arctic directly containing code you wrote is undeniably fun to think about. Whats more, your code will now almost certainly outlive you! But do you, dear Hackaday reader, think this project is a fun exercise in sci-fi, or does it hold real value to humanity?

Original post:
Ask Hackaday: Why Did GitHub Ship All Our Software Off To The Arctic? - Hackaday

CRM Startup vcita Opens Its Platform to Developers For Shared Innovation – Yahoo Finance

vcita, a customer relationship management (CRM) startup that develops cloud solutions for small businesses, has opened its platform to developers. The move enables SMBs to create custom applications that tap into vcitas suite of business management tools, driving greater efficiencies and fueling innovation.

vcita has been on a roll over the past quarter, partnering with Mastercard (NYSE:MA) to launch a platform for businesses embracing digital and integrating with Squares (NYSE:SQ) payment infrastructure. The decision to effectively decentralize vcitas platform, freeing small businesses and developers to build upon it, will bring vcitas CRM solution to a broader audience, while empowering SMBs to embrace digital tools that can unlock new capabilities and allow them to better serve their customers.

A newly launched developer hub will grant access to vcitas APIs, with detailed documentation and tutorials guiding devs through the process of building upon the CRM startups framework.

While open source software is a staple of the computing industry, its uncommon for startups to open their proprietary technology to third parties. vcita seems confident, however, that any drawbacks of doing so will be more than countered by the benefits of spurring a wave of innovation that will increase adoption of vcitas CRM tools while placing advanced cloud software in the hands of SMBs.

As vcita CBDO Adi Engel explains, We firmly believe that forming strategic alliances is the key to realizing our mission to include SME owners in the global shift towards a more digital economy. The sort of tools that small businesses will be able to access via vcitas APIs include solutions for scheduling, payment collection, and marketing campaigns. Not only will this help small businesses to go fully digital, but it will free them from expensive SaaS subscriptions that can quickly stack up, eroding profits.

vcitas decision to open source its technology arrives at a time when businesses the world over are embracing remote working after the effects of the coronavirus forced their hand. Many have found the arrangement favorable, for employers and employees alike. Google (NASDAQ:GOOG), for example, has just announced that its remote working program has been extended until the middle of 2021. The transition to remote working has increased demand for scheduling software and similar CRM tools developed by startups like vcita.

Research shows that employees who work remotely are happier and more productive. While that may not have been paramount in vcitas move to an open framework, its evidence of the inexorable shift to digital, and the need for purpose-built tools that can keep teams in the loop and help businesses adapt to a rapidly changing environment. Having thrown down the gauntlet to developers eager to build solutions that align with this narrative, vcita is aiming to accelerate adoption of software suited to a distributed workforce and global customer base.

Disclosure: No positions.

View post:
CRM Startup vcita Opens Its Platform to Developers For Shared Innovation - Yahoo Finance

Donald Trump Jr. Returns to Twitter, Reacts to Being Booted Off Platform – PopCulture.com

Donald Trump Jr. has returned to Twitter, after being temporarily suspended, and is reacting to being booted off the social media site. On Tuesday, Trump Jr. sat down with Fox News' Tucker Carlson to share his thoughts on his Twitter labeling a video he shared about the use of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for coronavirus as containing misinformation.

"I've been saying this for a long time," Trump Jr. said. "I wrote my first book about justice and censorship coming from the big tech giants from California, as homogenous a group as you could possibly imagine. If they are censoring my account, they are censoring others and they've been trying to do this for a while," He added, "I've been talking about the de-platforming, that demonetization of people that are preaching conservative values, because you have to note, this never happens to someone saying something that benefits the left. It only hurts conservatives." Trump Jr. stated that he was not officially endorsing the video's claims, but that he felt it was something the public should see as it shared an opposing perspective to what "they've been force-feeding us for a little while."

Trump Jr. accused Twitter of taking a hypocritical stance, saying that his account was suspended but that Chinese officials have posted "disinformation" about the COVID-19 but have not been hit with the same consequence. "Because I have a large platform, I'm canceled," Trump Jr. said. "You know who else got thrown out of Twitter for the same offense? Sidney Powell, who happens to be Michael Flynn's attorney and someone who has been sticking it to the left."

Carlson offered his thoughts on the situation as well, saying, "If I see another Republican officeholder backed by Google and the Chamber of Commerce lecture me that it's not really censorship because the government isn't doing it, I'm going to go bananas." Trump Jr. eventually closed his interview with Carlson by taking a verbal jab at House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), who reminded the Republicans on the committee to wear face masks, while donning his in an ill-fitting manner. "This is typical Democrat," Trump Jr. stated. "Do as I say and not as I do."

See the original post:

Donald Trump Jr. Returns to Twitter, Reacts to Being Booted Off Platform - PopCulture.com

Turkey: Social media law’s passage raises censorship worries – Waco Tribune-Herald

In environments where people share their personal, daily lives like Instagram, I dont believe interference is right, Aslan said. But on channels like Twitter, where people can easily be misled, to be honest, I think regulation is the right thing to do.

But Tugrul Calis, 62, disagreed. An avid social media user, Calis said he wouldn't want to break the law.

So what do you do? You automatically self-censor. And thats the worst: A person not being able to freely share his or her thoughts, to censor ones self, Calis said

Cyber-rights activist, lawyer and academic Yaman Akdeniz warned: These measures will have a chilling effect on Turkish social media platform users and people will be scared to use these platforms because Turkish authorities will have access to the users data.

Rights groups and the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights came out against the bill Tuesday ahead of the vote, with Amnesty International calling it draconian.

If passed, these amendments would significantly increase the governments powers to censor online content and prosecute social media users. This is a clear violation of the right to freedom of expression online and contravenes international human rights law and standards," Amnesty International's Andrew Gardner said.

Visit link:

Turkey: Social media law's passage raises censorship worries - Waco Tribune-Herald

Greg Gutfeld on conservative censorship: ‘Abuse only goes one way’ – Fox News

Censorship and "abuse" from Big Tech companies seem to only skew towardconservatives, "The Greg Gutfeld Show" host Greg Gutfeld stated Wednesday.

However, in an interviewon"Fox & Friends,"Gutfeld pointed out that perhapsTwitter's 12-hour suspension of Donald Trump Jr.'s accountwould have a reverse effect than the one intended.

TRUMP JR. BASHES TWITTER OVER SUSPENSION: 'THIS NEVER HAPPENS TO...THE LEFT,' 'IT ONLY HURTS CONSERVATIVES'

"What happens when you censor if you call this censoring; I guess you can everybody wants to see it," he said. "I want people to censor my bookbecause I know then it will sellmore."

"If you say to like,Hey ... you can do whatever you want,but whatever you do, do not lookin that box under my bed. You know the first thing hes going to do is look in that box under mybed where hell find Gwyneth Paltrows head," Gutfeld remarked, in an apparent reference to the 1995 blockbuster "Se7en."

"Yes, its perfect. So, its like, everybody wins with this," he added.

On Tuesday, Twitter penalized the youngerTrump forposting misinformation about theanti-malaria drughydroxychloroquine.

Tweets with the video are in violation of our COVID-19 misinformation policy, Liz Kelley, a spokeswoman for Twitter, later told The Washington Post.

In an interview on"Tucker Carlson Tonight"the same evening, Trump Jr. asserted that California-based tech giants had "been tryingto do this for a while."

"I've been talking about the deplatforming, that demonetization of people that are preaching conservative values," he noted, "because you have to note, thisnever happens to someone sayingsomething that benefits theleft.It only hurts conservatives."

Gutfeld said that he shared Trump son's concerns.

"And, by theway, this stuff wouldn't alarmme except all of the censorship,all of the abuse goes one way. It's always kind of towardsconservatives," he said.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

"Meanwhile, the left canperpetrate or spread any kind of hoax thatthey want on any social mediaplatform. But, everybody mysteriouslyis OKwith that," Gutfeld told the "Friends" hosts.

"No one seems to be bothered bythe fact that they can saywhatever they want.It's only when it comes from theright that it's a problem," he concluded.

Here is the original post:

Greg Gutfeld on conservative censorship: 'Abuse only goes one way' - Fox News

Tech C.E.O.s From Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google to Testify Before Congress – The New York Times

The length of the hearing may also be prolonged since the antitrust issues facing Apple, Facebook, Google and Amazon are complex and vastly different.

Amazon is accused of abusing its role as both a retailer and a platform hosting third-party sellers on its marketplace. Apple has been accused of unfairly using its clout over its App Store to block rivals and to force apps to pay high commissions. Rivals have said Facebook has a monopoly in social networking. Alphabet, the parent company of Google, is dealing with multiple antitrust allegations because of Googles dominance in online advertising, search and smartphone software.

Democrats may also veer off the topic of antitrust and bring up concerns about misinformation on social media. Some Republicans are expected to sidetrack discussion with their concerns of liberal bias at the Silicon Valley companies and accusations that conservative voices are censored.

There was an attitude these were great American companies that created jobs and that we should have a hands-off approach and let them flourish, Mr. Cicilline said in an interview. But there are a lot of serious issues we have uncovered over the course of the investigation that werent apparent when we first began investigating.

Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple declined to comment.

For the chief executives, the hearing will be a test of how they perform under fire. Mr. Bezos, 56, has not previously testified to Congress, while Mr. Cook, 59, and Mr. Pichai, 48, have both testified once before. Mr. Zuckerberg, 36, the youngest of the group, has the distinction of being the veteran: He has answered questions at three congressional hearings in the past two years as Facebook has dealt with issues such as election interference and privacy violations.

But none are taking any chances for the event to go awry. Mr. Zuckerberg, who had been at his 750-acre estate on the Hawaiian island of Kauai, has been preparing for his testimony with the law firm WilmerHale, according to people with knowledge of the matter. And a small team is working with Mr. Bezos for his testimony in Seattle, said people with knowledge of the matter.

For weeks, the tech giants have also waged a lobbying battle to soften any blows. All four chief executives planned to call lawmakers on the House subcommittee in the days before the hearing, said three people with knowledge of the preparations who were not authorized to speak publicly.

More here:

Tech C.E.O.s From Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google to Testify Before Congress - The New York Times

The future of encryption: Getting ready for the quantum computer attack – TechRepublic

PQShield, a spin-out from the UK's Oxford University, is developing advanced cryptographic solutions for hardware, software and communications to protect businesses' data from the quantum threat.

The development of quantum computers poses a cybersecurity problem such as the IT industry has never seen before. All stored data currently deemed secure by modern standards whether that's health records, financial data, customer databases and even critical government infrastructure could, in theory, be cracked by quantum computers, which are capable of effectively short circuiting the encryption we've used to protect that data until now.

Efforts to protect our data from the quantum threat are underway, though whether the issue is being looked at with the urgency it deserves is up for debate. PQShield, a post-quantum cryptography startup spun out of Oxford University, perceives a disconnect between the scale of the threat and the current cyber-readiness of most businesses in 2020, which it is now trying to address.

SEE: Quantum computing: Myths v. Realities (TechRepublic)

"The scale of the quantum attack is just too big to imagine," Dr. Ali Kaafarani, research fellow at Oxford's Mathematical Institute and founder of PQShield, tells TechRepublic.

"The most important part of what we're doing is to educate the market."

Kaafarani is a former engineer at Hewlett-Packard Labs and leads a team of 10 full-time quantum cryptographers, from what he estimates to be a worldwide pool of just a hundred or so. The company is busy working on the development of quantum-secure cryptography encryption solutions for hardware, software and communications that will secure information from future risk, yet can be implemented using today's technology.

This comprises a system on chip (SoC) and software development kit that allow companies to create secure messaging applications, protected by a "post-quantum" variant of the Signal cryptographic protocol. Central to PQShield's technology is that it is designed to work with both legacy systems as well as those expected in the years to come, meaning it could offer protection for everything from keyless cars and other connected devices, to data moving to and from cloud servers.

This, Kaafarani explains, is important owing to the fact that post-quantum cryptography cannot be retrospectively implemented meanwhile data encrypted by modern standards remains open to post-quantum threats. "What we're using right now as end-to-end encryption...is secure now, but people can intercept them and steal encrypted data," he says.

"Once they have access to a quantum computer, they can decrypt them, so confidentiality is threatened in retrospect, because whatever is considered confidential now can be decrypted later on."

Kaafarani also perceives an issue with the current attitudes to remediating cyberattacks, which he likens to applying a band-aid to a repeating problem.

SEE: SSL Certificate Best Practices Policy (TechRepublic Premium)

"That's why we started PQShield to fill in this gap, to lead the way to a smooth and secure transition to the quantum era. There is a real opportunity here to get things right from the beginning."

The startup recently completed a 5.5m funding round led by VC Firm Kindred Capital and has now secured German engineering company Bosch as its first OEM customer. While the exact details of the deal are still under wraps, Kaafarani says the deal is indicative of the threats businesses are beginning to identify as the age of quantum computing approaches.

"Their hardware may be built to last, but right now, their security isn't," he says.

"If you're designing a car that's going to go on the roads in the next three years, if you're doing security by design, you should be thinking of the next security standards: not the standards that are valid now, but the standards that will be valid in the next five, 10, 15 years," he says.

"Future-proofing is an imperative, just as it is for the banks and agencies that hold so much of our sensitive data."

Be in the know about smart cities, AI, Internet of Things, VR, AR, robotics, drones, autonomous driving, and more of the coolest tech innovations. Delivered Wednesdays and Fridays

Originally posted here:
The future of encryption: Getting ready for the quantum computer attack - TechRepublic

93% of Bitcoin’s Supply Profitable at $11K, ‘Realized Price’ Recovers from Black Thursday – Bitcoin News

Onchain data shows that bitcoins breakout above $11,000 puts 93% of the circulating supply in a state of profit. Additionally, seven-day metrics show that bitcoins realized price has recovered from the low that took place on March 12.

The research and analysis firm Glassnode revealed that when the price of bitcoin (BTC) is over the $11,000 range, 93% of bitcoin in circulation becomes profitable. At the time of publication, BTC has been struggling to hold that momentum as the price has shifted below the $11k range a couple of times on Tuesday.

The spike on Tuesday led to a decent jump in onchain profits Glassnode detailed on Twitter.

BTCs break above $11,000 has led to a sharp increase in the onchain supply in profit. Currently, almost 93% of the circulating bitcoin supply is in a state of profit the highest level in over a year, the analytics firm tweeted.

Moreover, BTC has recovered from the March 12 (Black Thursday) market rout. Data shows that the crypto assets realized price has turned Black Thursdays trend upside down. Glassnodes charts set for seven-day statistics also indicate that realized price has doubled.

To add to those stats, bitcoin (BTC) charts show that long term holding has touched a new high. 62% of Bitcoin supply (11,400,000 BTC) has not moved in at least a year, the bitcoiner Kevin Rooke told his 11,000 Twitter followers on Monday.

Furthermore, BTC profitible days stats from the web portal Lookintobitcoin shows that the crypto asset has been profitable over 97% of its lifespan.

The current optimism in the world of cryptocurrencies has been quite different this time around as the world is dealing with the reaction to Covid-19 and the faltering economy.

During the last few days, the USD and U.S. bonds have weakened considerably and many economists think the central bank will suppress benchmark interest rates this week. Vijay Ayyar, head of business development at Luno believes that central banks will keep bolstering crypto assets like BTC.

My view is that with the major governments declaring unprecedented stimulus packages we will see continued bullish momentum across markets. So that includes equities and gold as well. And BTC and crypto will follow in this regard. Added to the fact that a vaccine seems within reach as well now, no reason to be bearish near term, Ayyar said.

With a lifespan of 97% profitability and 93% when the price is over $11,000 is a good sign crypto proponents. However, bitcoin mining operations need another $1,500 more for miners to start prospering, as they did before the May 11 halving.

A report from the blockchain analytics provider Tradeblock shows that $12,525 per BTC would bring miners over the edge and $15,062 per coin would improve profits a great deal.

What do you think about BTC profitability after bitcoins recent runup? Let us know what you think in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, Glassnode, Lookintobitcoin,

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

View original post here:
93% of Bitcoin's Supply Profitable at $11K, 'Realized Price' Recovers from Black Thursday - Bitcoin News

Tether mints $540 million during Bitcoin price rally – Decrypt

The Tether Treasury has minted $540 million of its US dollar-backed stablecoin in the last three days, as Bitcoins price rallied above $11,000.

According to Whale Alert, $300 million was created today on the Tron network, after two previous mints of $120 million on Ethereum in the past three days.

Crypto exchange Bitfinex and Tether CTO Paolo Ardoino explained on Twitter that the transactions were to replenish the inventory, in preparation for more demand.

Note this is a (sic) authorized but not issued transaction, meaning that this amount will be used as inventory for next period issuance requests, he said.

Tether is the most commonly used stablecoin with a market cap of $10 billion. Its value is pegged to the US dollar, enabling it to avoid the price fluctuations typical of most cryptocurrencies.

As Decrypt reported, Bitcoin broke the $10,000 and $11,000 marks on July 2627, driving the crypto market into a strong rally. As a result, trading volumes have doubled and Bitcoin is being pumped back into exchanges. It's no wonder that demand for Tether is on the rise.

More:
Tether mints $540 million during Bitcoin price rally - Decrypt