« First...102030...623624625626627...630640650...Last »

Global and United States Quantum Computing Market 2020 Upcoming Trends, Growth Drivers and Challenges, Forecast to 2026 by Microsoft, 1QB Information…

Posted on by

Global and United States Quantum Computing Market Research 2020-2026 may be a historical summary and in-depth study on the present & future market of the Quantum Computing industry. The report represents a basic summary of the Quantum Computing market share, competition section with a basic introduction of key vendors, prime regions, product varieties and finish industries. This report offers a historical summary of the Quantum Computing market trends, growth, revenue, capacity, value structure and key drivers analysis.

The report primarily studies the Quantum Computing market size, recent trends and development standing, also as investment opportunities, market dynamics (such as driving factors, restraining factors) and industry news (like mergers, acquisitions and investments). Technological innovation and advancement can additional optimize the performance of the merchandise, creating it a lot of wide utilized in downstream applications. Moreover, Porters 5 Forces Analysis (potential entrants, suppliers, substitutes, buyers, industry competitors) provides crucial info for knowing the Quantum Computing market.

Access Free Sample Copy of Quantum Computing Market Report 2020: https://calibreresearch.com/report/covid19-impact-quantum-computing-market-31302#request-sample

In COVID-19 outbreak, this report provides analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on the worldwide economy and therefore the Quantum Computing industry. International Quantum Computing industry 2020 marketing research Report additionally provides exclusive statistic, data, info, trends and competitive landscape details during this niche sector.

NOTE: Our reports include the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry. Our new sample is updated which correspond in new report showing impact of Covid-19 on Industry trends. Also we are offering 20% discount

Top Countries knowledge coated in Quantum Computing Market Report are US, Canada, Mexico, Germany, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Russia, China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, Southeast Asia, Asian country, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria, African nation, Brazil, Argentina, Columbia, Chile and Others.

Major Market Manufacturers indulged in this report are:

Anyon SystemsCambridge Quantum ComputingIntelMicrosoft1QB Information TechnologiesQxBranchD-Wave SystemsGoogleIBMID QuantiqueIonQQbitLogicQubitekkRigetti ComputingQC WareQuantum Circuits

Quantum Computing Market 2020 segments by product types:

Topological Qubits TechnologySuperconducting Loops TechnologyTrapped Ion Technology

The Application of Global and United States Quantum Computing Market 2020-2026 as follows:

TransportationAerospace and DefenseIT and TelecomGovernment

Under COVID-19 outbreak globally, this report provides 360 degrees of research from offer chain, import and export management to regional government policy and future influence on the industry. careful analysis regarding market standing (2016-2020), enterprise competition pattern, blessings and downsides of enterprise merchandise, industry development trends (2020-2026), regional industrial layout characteristics and political economy policies, industrial policy has additionally been enclosed.

Do You Have Any Query or Specific Requirement? Ask to Our Industry Expert https://calibreresearch.com/report/covid19-impact-quantum-computing-market-31302#inquiry-for-buying

From raw materials to finish users of this industry are analyzed scientifically, the trends of product circulation and sales channel are bestowed also. Considering COVID-19, this report provides comprehensive and in-depth analysis on however the epidemic push this industry transformation and reform.

Global and United States Quantum Computing Market providing info like company profiles, product image and specification, capacity, production, price, cost, revenue and speak to info. Upstream raw materials and instrumentality and downstream demand analysis are administrated. The worldwide Quantum Computing market development trends and selling channels are analyzed. Finally, the feasibleness of recent investment comes is assessed and overall analysis conclusions offered.

Checkout FREE Report Sample of Quantum Computing Market Report for Better Understanding: https://calibreresearch.com/report/covid19-impact-quantum-computing-market-31302#request-sample

With tables and figures serving to analyze worldwide international Quantum Computing market growth factors, this analysis provides key statistics on the state of the industry and may be a valuable supply of steerage and direction for firms and people fascinated by the market.

See the original post:
Global and United States Quantum Computing Market 2020 Upcoming Trends, Growth Drivers and Challenges, Forecast to 2026 by Microsoft, 1QB Information...

Quantum Computing Technologies Market 2020 Recovering From Covid-19 Outbreak | Know About Brand Players: D-Wave Systems Inc., IBM Corporation,…

Posted on by

Others

Request customization of the report @https://reportsglobe.com/need-customization/?rid=7585

The market is geographically spread across several key geographic regions and the report includes regional analysis as well as production, consumption, revenue and market share in these regions for the 2020-2027 forecast period. Regions include North America, Latin America, Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East, and Africa.

Competitive Scenario of the Quantum Computing Technologies Market

The chapter on competitive landscape provides information about key company overview, global presence, sales & revenue generated, company market share, and strategies initiatives.

Our analysts engage in extensive primary and secondary research to cull out in-depth and authentic information. Primary research includes gathering information from official government and company websites, journals, and reports. Secondary research includes interviews conducted with VPs, chairmen, directors, and other distinguished sales managers.

Key Questions Addressed in the Report:

To learn more about the report, visit @ https://reportsglobe.com/product/global-quantum-computing-technologies-market-size-study/

Thanks for reading our report. It is possible to adapt this report to the wishes of the customer. Contact us to learn more about the report and our team will make sure you create a report based on your needs.

How Reports Globe is different than other Market Research Providers

The inception of Reports Globe has been backed by providing clients with a holistic view of market conditions and future possibilities/opportunities to reap maximum profits out of their businesses and assist in decision making. Our team of in-house analysts and consultants works tirelessly to understand your needs and suggest the best possible solutions to fulfill your research requirements.

Our team at Reports Globe follows a rigorous process of data validation, which allows us to publish reports from publishers with minimum or no deviations. Reports Globe collects, segregates, and publishes more than 500 reports annually that cater to products and services across numerous domains.

Contact us:

Mr. Mark Willams

Account Manager

US: +1-970-672-0390

Email:[emailprotected]

Web:reportsglobe.com

See the original post here:
Quantum Computing Technologies Market 2020 Recovering From Covid-19 Outbreak | Know About Brand Players: D-Wave Systems Inc., IBM Corporation,...

An AI tool can distinguish between a conspiracy theory and a true conspiracy it comes down to how easily the story falls apart – Jacksonville…

Posted on by

(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.)

Timothy R. Tangherlini, University of California, Berkeley

(THE CONVERSATION) The audio on the otherwise shaky body camera footage is unusually clear. As police officers search a handcuffed man who moments before had fired a shot inside a pizza parlor, an officer asks him why he was there. The man says to investigate a pedophile ring. Incredulous, the officer asks again. Another officer chimes in, Pizzagate. Hes talking about Pizzagate.

In that brief, chilling interaction in 2016, it becomes clear that conspiracy theories, long relegated to the fringes of society, had moved into the real world in a very dangerous way.

Conspiracy theories, which have the potential to cause significant harm, have found a welcome home on social media, where forums free from moderation allow like-minded individuals to converse. There they can develop their theories and propose actions to counteract the threats they uncover.

But how can you tell if an emerging narrative on social media is an unfounded conspiracy theory? It turns out that its possible to distinguish between conspiracy theories and true conspiracies by using machine learning tools to graph the elements and connections of a narrative. These tools could form the basis of an early warning system to alert authorities to online narratives that pose a threat in the real world.

The culture analytics group at the University of California, which I and Vwani Roychowdhury lead, has developed an automated approach to determining when conversations on social media reflect the telltale signs of conspiracy theorizing. We have applied these methods successfully to the study of Pizzagate, the COVID-19 pandemic and anti-vaccination movements. Were currently using these methods to study QAnon.

Collaboratively constructed, fast to form

Actual conspiracies are deliberately hidden, real-life actions of people working together for their own malign purposes. In contrast, conspiracy theories are collaboratively constructed and develop in the open.

Conspiracy theories are deliberately complex and reflect an all-encompassing worldview. Instead of trying to explain one thing, a conspiracy theory tries to explain everything, discovering connections across domains of human interaction that are otherwise hidden mostly because they do not exist.

While the popular image of the conspiracy theorist is of a lone wolf piecing together puzzling connections with photographs and red string, that image no longer applies in the age of social media. Conspiracy theorizing has moved online and is now the end-product of a collective storytelling. The participants work out the parameters of a narrative framework: the people, places and things of a story and their relationships.

The online nature of conspiracy theorizing provides an opportunity for researchers to trace the development of these theories from their origins as a series of often disjointed rumors and story pieces to a comprehensive narrative. For our work, Pizzagate presented the perfect subject.

Pizzagate began to develop in late October 2016 during the runup to the presidential election. Within a month, it was fully formed, with a complete cast of characters drawn from a series of otherwise unlinked domains: Democratic politics, the private lives of the Podesta brothers, casual family dining and satanic pedophilic trafficking. The connecting narrative thread among these otherwise disparate domains was the fanciful interpretation of the leaked emails of the Democratic National Committee dumped by WikiLeaks in the final week of October 2016.

AI narrative analysis

We developed a model a set of machine learning tools that can identify narratives based on sets of people, places and things and their relationships. Machine learning algorithms process large amounts of data to determine the categories of things in the data and then identify which categories particular things belong to.

We analyzed 17,498 posts from April 2016 through February 2018 on the Reddit and 4chan forums where Pizzagate was discussed. The model treats each post as a fragment of a hidden story and sets about to uncover the narrative. The software identifies the people, places and things in the posts and determines which are major elements, which are minor elements and how theyre all connected.

The model determines the main layers of the narrative in the case of Pizzagate, Democratic politics, the Podesta brothers, casual dining, satanism and WikiLeaks and how the layers come together to form the narrative as a whole.

To ensure that our methods produced accurate output, we compared the narrative framework graph produced by our model with illustrations published in The New York Times. Our graph aligned with those illustrations, and also offered finer levels of detail about the people, places and things and their relationships.

Sturdy truth, fragile fiction

To see if we could distinguish between a conspiracy theory and an actual conspiracy, we examined Bridgegate, a political payback operation launched by staff members of Republican Gov. Chris Christies administration against the Democratic mayor of Fort Lee, New Jersey.

As we compared the results of our machine learning system using the two separate collections, two distinguishing features of a conspiracy theorys narrative framework stood out.

First, while the narrative graph for Bridgegate took from 2013 to 2020 to develop, Pizzagates graph was fully formed and stable within a month. Second, Bridgegates graph survived having elements removed, implying that New Jersey politics would continue as a single, connected network even if key figures and relationships from the scandal were deleted.

The Pizzagate graph, in contrast, was easily fractured into smaller subgraphs. When we removed the people, places, things and relationships that came directly from the interpretations of the WikiLeaks emails, the graph fell apart into what in reality were the unconnected domains of politics, casual dining, the private lives of the Podestas and the odd world of satanism.

In the illustration below, the green planes are the major layers of the narrative, the dots are the major elements of the narrative, the blue lines are connections among elements within a layer and the red lines are connections among elements across the layers. The purple plane shows all the layers combined, showing how the dots are all connected. Removing the WikiLeaks plane yields a purple plane with dots connected only in small groups.

Early warning system?

There are clear ethical challenges that our work raises. Our methods, for instance, could be used to generate additional posts to a conspiracy theory discussion that fit the narrative framework at the root of the discussion. Similarly, given any set of domains, someone could use the tool to develop an entirely new conspiracy theory.

[Deep knowledge, daily. Sign up for The Conversations newsletter.]

However, this weaponization of storytelling is already occurring without automatic methods, as our study of social media forums makes clear. There is a role for the research community to help others understand how that weaponization occurs and to develop tools for people and organizations who protect public safety and democratic institutions.

Developing an early warning system that tracks the emergence and alignment of conspiracy theory narratives could alert researchers and authorities to real-world actions people might take based on these narratives. Perhaps with such a system in place, the arresting officer in the Pizzagate case would not have been baffled by the gunmans response when asked why hed shown up at a pizza parlor armed with an AR-15 rifle.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here: https://theconversation.com/an-ai-tool-can-distinguish-between-a-conspiracy-theory-and-a-true-conspiracy-it-comes-down-to-how-easily-the-story-falls-apart-146282.

Read this article:
An AI tool can distinguish between a conspiracy theory and a true conspiracy it comes down to how easily the story falls apart - Jacksonville...

Letters: Free Assange; protect the press (11/7/20) – The Denver Post

Posted on by

Dave Granlund, PoliticalCartoons.comFree Assange; protect the press

Democracy requires a free press.

We see press freedom in the news when the president attacks the media or when social media platforms restrict open dialogue. And the most important First Amendment case in generations is underway right now as the U.S. government attempts to extradite WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange.

Assange has been indicted for his role in publishing the Chelsea Manning leaks, which won awards for exposing potential war crimes, revealing civilian casualties, and changing the public conversation about our endless post-9/11 wars. They also made Manning and Assange targets. Manning spent seven years behind bars, and Assange sought refuge from Ecuador to avoid falling into U.S. hands. Assange was arrested in London last year and faces 175 years in prison on unprecedented Espionage Act charges that have drawn global condemnation from journalists and legal scholars.

In August, an international coalition of lawyers and legal societies called on the United Kingdom to release Assange. They noted that Assange would not receive a fair trial, that the allegations against him were political offenses, and that Assange would likely be subject to inhumane treatmen like solitary confinement.

Neither Trump nor Biden have good records on this issue. Trumps administration is prosecuting Assange. Biden once called Assange a high-tech terrorist. We should pressure both candidates to endorse dropping the extradition request. And we should call on Colorados congressional delegation to support whistleblower protections and the freedom of the press.

Kendra Christian, Denver

Editors note: Christian is a volunteer with Denver Action to Free Assange.

Re: November starts out warm, then a cold snap arrives, Nov. 1 news story

I find it strange and amazing that 10 of the highest temps you show on your chart were all at least 46 years ago, and some date back to the 1800s. Where is global warming?

Steven Petty, Monument

Re: Why Gardner lost Senate seat, Nov. 5 news story

Your sub headline reads Changing electorate, Trump, coronavirus pandemic helped. Maybe its as simple as Hickenlooper is more popular

Joe Pickard, Littleton

Heartbreaking that President Donald Trump declared in his Nov. 2 stump event in Fayetteville, N.C., that Your tobacco growers are in good shape, by the way. Please let them know.

Thankful that President Trump doesnt smoke like my poor Alabama father, a WWII veteran that survived the Philippines Campaign but his emphysema-by-smoking killed him in 1964.

It is so sad that Trump proclaims to be pro-life while tobacco has painfully and slowly killed nearly 2 million people during his administration. Humanity grieves that pro-death tobacco has compromised and controlled all our earthly leaders. Fatherless by tobacco at age 11.

Mike Sawyer, Denver

To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.

Read the rest here:

Letters: Free Assange; protect the press (11/7/20) - The Denver Post

Letters to the Editor Sunday, Nov. 8 – The Daily Gazette

Posted on by

Categories: Letters to the Editor, Opinion

Holidays loom for St. Clares pensioners. We are all born to help each other. No matter how difficult it isLife is good when you are happy; but much better when others are happy because of you. Pope Francis.As I sit watching the blue moon, I am thinking about this quote and how it applies to the difficult months we have endured due to the coronavirus, limitations on socializing with family, the political bashings, opinionated journalism and horrific bullying.With that being said, life is difficult right now.I was one of over 1,100 employees of St. Clares Hospital that lost my pension. Our goal as healthcare workers made lives better.I have comforted patients and their families. I have produced images that enabled doctors to properly diagnose a patients illness and broken bones. I have assisted in the Operating Room with radiographic images ensuring surgical precision.Now as the holidays are quickly approaching, our money worries are compounded.Many of the pensioners had to give up their homes; abandon retirement dreams, have increasing credit card debt to cover essentials, home repairs and medical expenses; and have drastically curtailed their spending.Many have returned to the workforce to survive.I keep hoping and praying that the Albany Diocese, Catholic Church and New York state find a resolution to our lost pension.We are not asking for anything more than what is due us for service to the Schenectady and surrounding area. Because in the words of Pope Francis: We are born to help each other.Cynthia OBryanEsperance

Reporting in publics interest not a crime

Journalistic publications, including WikiLeaks, exist to tell the people the truth even when the government tries to spin it or hide it.Confronting uncomfortable truths is necessary in a democracy; for this reason, I am deeply concerned with the U.S. governments prosecution of Julian Assange.It is already hard enough to get the truth to the public. Sometimes it takes brave whistleblowers willing to leak secrets, knowing they are putting their careers and freedom on the line.Soon, however, the journalists who help reveal these secrets might be targets of prosecution.If Assange is extradited to the United States to face 175 years in prison for journalism, it would set a dangerous legal precedent that could impact press freedom around the world.If reporting in the public interest becomes a crime simply because the government declares something a secret, we fall deeper into our worst authoritarian tendencies.Elyse GilbertFort Plain

Thanks to all who made voting so easy

I want to share my experience voting on Election Day.I live in Ballston Spa a few blocks from the mid-village county office building, one of the three Saratoga County early voting sites.Each day over the last two weeks through Sunday there were lines of early voters standing in the parking lot, on the sidewalk to Low Street, and often down Low almost to Front Street.They stood buttoned up in coats to keep warm in the autumn chill, they stood under umbrellas when it rained, and they appeared patient and friendly toward their socially distant nearby neighbors.I was determined to vote on Election Day.I admit to experiencing anxiety, given the number of early voters and their determination.In addition to these observations, there was the steady drumbeat of the news media shrilling about the imagined impediments to voting all over the country.Election Day, I went to my polling place, Eagle Matt Lee Firehouse about two blocks from the county office building. I parked, walked in the front door, went to my areas registration desk and signed in on the poll workers electronic pad with the stylus provided.I was handed a ballot to fill out.When I finished, I took my ballot to the voting machine that accepted it.In about 10 minutes, I checked in, voted, had my signature and ballot digitized and walked out.Thank you to everyone who made my voting convenient, easy and a pleasure to complete.Forman PhillipsBallston Spa

Online letters

Commenters to online letters who fail to follow rules against name-calling, profanity, threats, libel or other inappropriate language will have their comments removed and their commenting privileges withdrawn.

To report inappropriate online comments, email Editorial Page Editor Mark Mahoney at[emailprotected].

See original here:

Letters to the Editor Sunday, Nov. 8 - The Daily Gazette

Petitions, Probes and Rupert Murdoch – CounterPunch.org – CounterPunch

Posted on by

Australia has given the world two influential and disruptive exports in the field of media. One, currently in Londons Belmarsh Prison, is facing the prospect of extradition to the United States for charges that could see him serve a 175 year sentence in a brutal, soul destroying supermax. The other, so the argument goes, should also be facing the prospect of incarceration for what he has done to politics in numerous countries. But media mogul Rupert Murdoch, the gruesome presence behind Fox News and News Corp, is unlikely to spend time in a cell any time soon. The same cannot be said for Julian Assange of WikiLeaks.

Ingratiatingly, politicians have made the journey of pilgrimage to the not-so-holy Murdoch to keep in his good books. Disgracefully, though motivated by perceived necessity, British Labours Tony Blair wooed Murdoch prior to the 1997 UK general election he was to win. The victory for New Labour led to an association between Blair and Murdoch that was, according to former Sunday Times editor Andrew Neil, almost incestuous.

Blairs kowtowing did its magic. As former deputy editor of The Sun, Neil Wallis, recalls in the first instalment of the documentary series The Rise of the Murdoch Dynasty, he was flayed by Murdoch for initially running what he called a fairly standard front page on the election. This was the same paper that boastfully declared on April 11, 1992, that, Its The Sun Wot Won It. Labour, then led by Neil Kinnock, was favoured in the polls to defeat John Majors weary, dysfunctional Conservatives. Murdoch, and his paper, would have none of it. On election day, the papers headline bellowed: If Kinnock wins today will the last person to leave Britain please turn out the lights.

By 1997, attitudes had changed. Wallis recalls entering his office after editing the first edition. Murdoch called: Hated your paper this morning, he raged. Two or three minutes later my door opens, Rupert comes up and says youre getting this wrong. Youve got this totally wrong. We are not just backing Tony Blair but we are going to back the Labour party and everything he does in this campaign 200%. Youve got to get that right.

The papers endorsement for Blair followed but came with its pound of tantalising flesh. Blair was required to write a puff piece for the paper promising a referendum should he wish Britain to embrace the Euro currency. Former UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage, forever associated with the Brexit campaign and Murdoch worship, saw this intervention as crucial. The price of Rupert Murdochs support for Tony Blair was that Blair promised he would not take us into the European currency without a referendum, and if Rupert Murdoch had not done that we would have joined the Euro in 1999 and I doubt Brexit would have happened.

In a 2016 study published in Social Science Research, the authors found that The Suns endorsement for Labour in 1997 led to a boost of support in the order of 7%. In 2010, the same papers return to backing the Conservatives increased support by 15%. Even if these figures were to be scaled back significantly, they would still suggest a degree of staggering influence.

It is precisely such power that has become something of an obsession for former Australian Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd. Rudd has never resiled from the view that Murdoch was directly responsible for his demise. True, his own knife-wielding colleagues in the Australian Labor Party, addled by negative poll ratings, were happy to do the deed, but it was Murdoch who sang the tune of encouragement. At the launch of his second volume of autobiography in 2018, Rudd claimed that Murdoch is ideologically, deeply conservative, deeply protective of his corporations commercial interests and, therefore, prosecutes a direct agenda through his newspapers which Ive been on the receiving end [of].

Another former Australian Prime Minister, Malcolm Turnbull, albeit from the conservative side of politics, is also convinced, having become something of a crusader against Murdoch and his foot soldiers. On the ABCs Insidersprogram, he warned of the costs accruing to Australia in permitting the dominance of Murdochs press imperium. We have to work out what price were paying, as a society, for the hyper-partisanship of the media. He cast his eye to the United States and the terribly divided state of affairs that theyre in, exacerbated, as Kevin [Rudd] was saying, by Fox News and other right-wing media.

This had led to an alliance of sorts between the two men on this point, despite Turnbulls previous description of Rudd as one of those miserable ghosts that haunt politics after the fact. A wiser Turnbull understands Rudd that much better after his own party initiated a palace coup, leading to the ascent of Australias current Prime Minister, Scott Morrison.

While an online petition against the dominance of the Murdoch press imperium seems like peashooter stuff, Rudds initiative has gathered momentum. His petition, now tabled in Australias Parliament, specifically calls for a royal commission to ensure the strength and diversity of Australian news media. Having received 501,876 signatures, it notes concern that Australias print media is overwhelmingly controlled by News Corporation, founded by Fox News billionaire Rupert Murdoch, with around two-thirds of daily newspaper readership. Australians holding views contrary to the Murdoch line have felt intimidated into silence. Adding to this such matters as the mass-sackings of news journalists, the stripping influence of digital platforms on media diversity, News Corps closure of 200 smaller newspapers after their acquisition and relentless attacks on the ABCs independence and funding, the picture is bleak.

The petitions tabling caused a flutter of interest in Parliament. While Murdoch is unlikely to break out into sweat at efforts made by Australias politicians to investigate his reach of influence, any inquiry will be irritating. Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young is certainly hoping to cause a stir, having pushed members of the Senate to establish an inquiry into media diversity in response to Rudds petition. Australians have become increasingly concerned about the concentration of media ownership and the power and political influence of Murdoch. The Senator is also keen to see the two former prime ministers speak frankly and have the protection of parliamentary privilege, which is important when youre talking about issues of power and influence.

Murdochs hirelings are ready. Unfortunately for Hanson-Young, the News Corp imperium is skilled in camouflaging inertia against change with promises of activity. The inquirys terms of reference are also shallow, omitting any reference to News Corp Australia while calling for an examination of the state of media diversity, independence and reliability in Australia and the impact that this has on public interest journalism and democracy.

News Corp Australias executive chairman, Michael Miller, was cool in his statement, noting that the company had participated in at least nine previous media inquiries. As always, we will continue to constructively engage in these important conversations. Murdoch will be hoping that the conservative Morrison government, and a good number of Labor opposition figures, will not go wobbly in preventing change. History may well prove him right. Again.

Read more:

Petitions, Probes and Rupert Murdoch - CounterPunch.org - CounterPunch

Murali Gopy writes against censorship of OTT platforms – Times of India

Posted on by

Actor-writer Murali Gopy has spoken against the Central government decision to bring online streaming and news websites under the regulatory purview of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. OTT platforms have offered viewers bold subjects and portrayals, compared to the offerings of mainstream cinema and TV, and that looks set to face curbs, thanks to the government decision which appeared through a gazette notification on November 9. This would apparently mean that OTT platforms would have the same censorship rules as TV.The actor, who has always been a vocal advocate against the idea of censorship of the creative arts, wrote on social media, Saving creative content from Governmental curbs, political agenda and ideological propaganda, is paramount to any democracy. Any effort to curb it, on any creative platform, needs to be fought legally through a concerted effort. Hope that would happen soon. The post was liked by actor and director Prithviraj.Murali also later posted a quote by 20th century Irish playwright George Bernad Shaw, that The first condition of progress is the removal of censorship.Editor Abhinav S Nayak, whose film credits include Uriyadi and Aanandam, also posted against the government decision, saying that if OTT platforms do not take up the fight against the government decision, subscribers would just move to other digital providers who would offer uncensored content. It is 2020 and no adult wants their content censored or cut. Piracy will rise and the industry will suffer. Yours sincerely, An adult with a working brain, he wrote.

Originally posted here:

Murali Gopy writes against censorship of OTT platforms - Times of India

Joe Rogan and other creators are in trouble if Spotify has censorship power – The Diamondback

Posted on by

Social media users cannot escape censorship. In an age of misinformation, Facebook and Twitter are attempting to regain control over their platforms and prevent users from spewing unreliable facts online. Removing problematic content is completely understandable, but the actions are also raising concerns.

Music streaming giant Spotify has subtly entered the discussion, and podcast creatives have every reason to be concerned about their work. Love him or hate him, Joe Rogan started this conversation, and his ongoing battle with Spotify is proving just how important it is.

Rogan is among the worlds most popular podcasters, and The Joe Rogan Experience has garnered a fiercely loyal fanbase. His fans not only respect his jokes, but they appreciate his willingness to embrace controversy. From politics to sports to neuroscience, he covers it all.

Rogan dominated podcasting independently before agreeing to a $100 million deal with Spotify earlier this year. Afterward, Spotify employees held meetings to voice their concerns about including his content on the platform. They even threatened to walk out if they could not have direct editorial oversight of the show. Rogan promised back in May there would be no censorship, and that the entire library would be available on Sept. 1.

[Review: The Queens Gambit is a gorgeous look at femininity, addiction and the 1950s]

Yet, when it first debuted on the platform, his show was missing episodes with his most controversial guests. Those included Mikhaila Peterson, Owen Benjamin and Alex Jones, among other right-wing activists, comedians and YouTubers.

Recently, fans noticed another recent episode with Jones had disappeared. If you believe what Spotify has said, then youd think that the episodes deletion was due to a technical glitch. Rogan said the same in an Instagram post that ironically was also deleted. But everything is riddled with speculation nowadays.

Even if listeners believe Rogan, the glitch reminded everyone of how serious censorships effects can be, and the desires of some Spotify employee to censor Rogan have brought up huge red flags for creators on the platform.

Rogan is not affiliated with a political party, but he is definitely a vocal commentator who leans libertarian. The JRE has never been labeled a news podcast, and Rogan is certainly not trying to win the Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting.

Instead of acting like a professional news anchor, he often presents repeatedly debunked conspiracy theories while painfully stoned. Rogan was brought to Spotify to be himself, which inevitably means making waves. An episode is sometimes like listening to a group of friends contemplate the existence of aliens while under the influence. Its concerning that Spotify employees hope to have serious editorial privileges over a show that is not even taking itself seriously (and, that utter ridiculousness is arguably responsible for podcastings shocking increase in popularity.)

[Netflix, we need to talk]

Fans are pointing out now that his recent apologies about spreading misinformation are uncharacteristic. In that recent episode with Alex Jones, Rogan met him with a healthy amount of questioning and included a fact-checker.

Trying to be more responsible is a worthwhile effort. However, Rogan should not be forced to lose his unfiltered attitude. That would be a blow to the shows creative integrity, especially given that it was never meant to be an accurate source of information.

Critics argue that someone is bound to take the nonsense that Rogans guests often spew seriously. This would require them to disregard the shows many disclaimers or labels. Some of the guests stances can absolutely be dangerous; however, context is crucial.

Listeners are not deceived into thinking they are hearing from the most sophisticated sources. The JRE could easily be classified as a comedy show. Criticizing a comedians content is easy. A good political comedian needs to push boundaries and make their audience a little uncomfortable. If Rogan cannot do that, he cannot properly do his job.

Call Her Daddys Alex Cooper is another comedy podcast host who deals with controversy over her content. Given the unclear standards for censorship across the internet, there is nothing stopping Spotify employees from going after the beloved Gluck Gluck, too. If political comedy is inappropriate for audiences, vulgar sex jokes are not immune to potential censorship, either.

Ultimately, Spotifys potential restrictive powers are not a political issue but a creative one. Due to the apps size, creators dont have many alternative platforms. Not everyone has a massive Rogan-sized following and budget that would allow them to work independently. Censorship needs to be watched to ensure the platform continues to welcome all podcasters and encourage creativity.

Originally posted here:

Joe Rogan and other creators are in trouble if Spotify has censorship power - The Diamondback

Fanatics have no right to censor critics. But neither does Emmanuel Macron – The Guardian

Posted on by

Letters complaining about newspaper articles are unexceptional. Not so letters from the lyse Palace. Last week, the Financial Times published, after the killing of teacher Samuel Paty in Paris and of churchgoers in Nice, an article by its Europe correspondent, Mehreen Khan, critical of French president Emmanuel Macrons policies towards Islam. Macrons desire to use the state to prescribe a correct religion, she wrote, has more in common with authoritarian Muslim leaders than enlightenment values of separating church and state.

Macron responded with a letter-cum-article defending himself and his policies and accusing Khan of misquoting him he insisted he had never talked of Islamic separatism, as Khan suggested, only of Islamist separatism. By the time the FT published Macrons letter, however, it had removed Khans article for factual inaccuracies. One could read the criticism but not what was being criticised. Newspapers do sometimes excise articles Im sure the Observer has done so. But they should do so only in truly exceptional circumstances, and then give a full account as to why. The removal of offending articles after criticism is, however, becoming a more acceptable part of our culture.

A few days before Khans article was pulled, Politico Europe published a highly disingenuous op-ed by leading French academic Farhad Khosrokhavar. The reason for Islamist terror, he said, lies in Frances extreme form of secularism and its embrace of blasphemy. Intellectuals who came out in praise of blasphemy should have considered their words more carefully. While French secularists are fighting for freedom of expression, he wrote, innocent people are dying, conveniently ignoring the fact that its not secularists doing the killing. You will have to take my word for all this because, after a barrage of criticism, Politico Europe removed the article for not meeting our editorial standards. I disagree with Khosrokhavars article, but I disagree, too, with its removal. This is not how journalism or public debate should work, or can work, especially when engaging with contentious issues.

At the same time, arguments such as Khosrokhavars must be robustly challenged. The claim that secularism and blasphemy help radicalise Islamists is false and dangerous. France has suffered grievously from Islamist terror 267 people have died in terror attacks since 2012 but it is far from a unique target. A week after the Nice killings came an Islamist terror attack in Vienna, with four people shot dead. Austria, unlike France, has a highly restrictive blasphemy law, which has been used to criminalise critics of Islam. In between the attacks in Nice and Vienna came terror strikes in Kabul and Peshawar, on university students and a Quran study class. The vast majority of jihadist killings are in Muslim-majority countries with obnoxiously tight blasphemy laws. Secularists and blasphemers in Bangladesh, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran and elsewhere have long faced murderous assaults, from both jihadists and the authorities. These are the people betrayed by western critics of blasphemy.

To say this is not to say that one should therefore defend Macron or his policies. For these policies, like much of the French response to Islam and terror, are shot through with hypocrisy and illiberalism. For all its claimed attachment to free speech, France has tough laws against speech deemed unacceptable, from Holocaust denial to insulting the French flag. It has criminalised those who call for a boycott of Israel. It has banned protests against Charlie Hebdo, and, after the 2015 massacre of the magazines staff, dozens of Muslims were arrested for suggesting sympathy with the killers, including a boy who posted on Facebook a cartoon mocking the magazine. A proposed law threatens academic freedom in the name of the values of the republic. Another would outlaw any filming of police in which officers may be identified.

Police brutality against those of North African origin is well documented. There is deep-seated racism in many spheres of social life from employment to housing, though figures are sparse given French reluctance to collect ethnic data. Being colour blind is all too often cover for being blind to racism.

Racism and double standards cannot be challenged by caving in to those who wish to restrict speech or the right to blaspheme. Nor can free speech be bolstered, or terrorism contained, by ignoring double standards, racist bigotry and the illiberalism of much of Macrons policies.

The struggles for free speech, in defence of secularism, against racism and to counter terrorism are inextricably linked. Self-censorship in response to Islamist threats needs resisting. So does self-censorship in response to the displeasure of democratic leaders.

Kenan Malik is an Observer columnist

Link:

Fanatics have no right to censor critics. But neither does Emmanuel Macron - The Guardian

Big Tech Censorship Is Proof That Media Are Trying To Steal The Election – The Federalist

Posted on by

Twitter is censoring conservatives sharing information and opinions about the election, reinforcing the expected big tech bias against dissenting voices. Since it has been established that Big Techs censorship often targets the truth such as the recovered Hunter Biden laptop, whether research backs mask mandates, the efficacy of certain anti-COVID drugs, the Russiagate coup attempt its clampdown on discussion of electoral integrity indicates it is indeed a concern.

The Federalists John Daniel Davidson wrote an article breaking down some of the suspicious activity associated with key states, headlined Yes, Democrats Are Trying To Steal The Election In Michigan, Wisconsin, And Pennsylvania.

Twitter censored The Federalists tweet of this article, prohibiting any shares, likes, or comments. The label on the post claims that the article contained disputed or misleading information related to the election.

Davidsons article, however, simply breaks down some of the significant voting discrepancies that have been raised as multiple battleground states continue to be uncalled and undecided.

Earlier in the day, Twitter censored The Federalist Co-Founder Sean Davis multiple times, preventing people from sharing or interacting with some of his tweets, for simply restating Pennsylvanias supreme court decision declaring that all ballots received after election day, including those without a postmark, will be counted.

Pennsylvanias top court said that all ballots received after election day even those without a postmark must be assumed to have been cast by election day, Davis said in a retweet of National Review Senior Writer David Harsanyi, who stated that PA is allowing post-election day ballots. Its a fact.

The same thing occurred when Davis pointed out a suspicious vote dump in Michigan that clocked 138,339 votes in the middle of the night all for Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.

Other conservative voices were also censored by Twitter such as The Daily Wires Matt Walsh.

Even the president was censored for claiming that the Democrats are attempting to steal the election.

A tweet from Biden claiming that were gonna win this, however, received no attention from the big tech giant.

The media also criticized Trump for announcing that he won even while states were being counted, but the same scrutiny was not applied when Bidens lawyer Bob Bauer prematurely declared a Biden victory.

It is clear from these labels, the limited distribution of these posts, and the hypocrisy demonstrated that big tech and the media dont believe that people can think for themselves. It is also clear that they are heavily invested in preventing the public from discussing or discovering the truth through inquiry and debate, as that often gives people the will to resist political changes imposed through lies.

Instead of admitting that there are still many unknowns in the presidential election, big tech and the media continue to assist Democrats in making a Biden win an inevitability rather than ensuring that all legal ballots are accurately counted so that both sides can trust the election outcome is legitimate.

Jordan Davidson is a staff writer at The Federalist. She graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism.

Read more:

Big Tech Censorship Is Proof That Media Are Trying To Steal The Election - The Federalist


« First...102030...623624625626627...630640650...Last »