Big Tech Execs and Bitcoin: Skype Cofounder Keeps Personal Wealth in Crypto, Intercom Chairman ‘Firmly Jumps on the Bitcoin Wagon’ | News – Bitcoin…

This week two well known tech executives revealed they have been dabbling in bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. In a recent interview, Skype cofounder Jaan Tallinn detailed that he held bitcoin and ethereum in his personal finances, while the Intercom cofounder Eoghan McCabe tweeted on Sunday that hes jumped firmly onto the bitcoin wagon.

In 2020 a number of popular tech executives and CEOs from giant firms have revealed they hold a fascination for cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and ethereum. On Friday, the cofounder of the telecommunications application Skype discussed a couple of donations he made in the past leveraging ethereum and bitcoin. Skypes cofounder Jaan Tallinn sent 350 ETH ($158k) to the London-based organization Faculty AI and in March 2020, Tallinn donated 50 BTC ($850k) to the group.

Faculty AI won $800k from the U.K. Home Office in order to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system that detects terrorism through social media. During his interview, Tallinn explained that the reason why he donated cryptocurrency to the organization is because he keeps a majority of his wealth in crypto assets.

He opted to donate the crypto directly because if he cashed out the digital assets he would be liable for capital gains. According to the recent interview, Faculty AIs annual accounts note that the company sold roughly $144k from the stash of ethereum in 2019.

Following the interview with Tallinn, another well known executive told his Twitter followers on Sunday that hes jumped into the bitcoin space. On November 15, 2020, the chairman and cofounder of Intercom, a well known American software firm, tweeted about the decentralized crypto asset bitcoin. Intercoms Eoghan McCabe disclosed he is holding bitcoin after messing around with the digital currency for years.

I would like to announce that after years of dabbling, Ive jumped firmly onto the Bitcoin wagon, McCabe tweeted. In a tweet that followed, McCabe noted that hes been listening to the Pomp Podcast and one in particular that features the Bitcoin evangelist Robert Breedlove. Mad love for all the Bitcoin freaks, McCabe added in another tweet. A great number of bitcoiners welcomed McCabe into the space, and a few individuals told him that he was still in the early adoption phase of bitcoin.

The Tallinn and McCabe news follows a number of prominent executives getting into the cryptocurrency space and discussing the benefits of bitcoin in 2020. Executives like billionaire Stanley Druckenmiller, the Bond King Jeffrey Gundlach, the well known fund manager Bill Miller, billionaire investor Paul Tudor Jones, and even the actor Kevin Hart jumped on the bitcoin wagon this year. Alongside this, the U.S. Senator, Cynthia Lummis, sees a lot of promise when it comes to the innovation provided by the crypto economy.

Even the traditional crypto naysayers are starting to discuss bitcoin in a more positive way. Former bitcoin doubter JPMorgans recent analysis shows institutional interest has been moving from gold exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to bitcoin. The infamous BTC hater, Nouriel Roubini (Dr. Doom), admitted that BTC might be a store of value in a recent interview with Yahoo Finance. With the way things are going, its likely a whole lot more popular tech and investor luminaries will be joining the cryptocurrency revolution. And maybe some former haters as well.

What do you think about Skype cofounder Jaan Tallinn holding most of his personal wealth in crypto and the Intercoms chairmans recent plunge into bitcoin? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

The rest is here:
Big Tech Execs and Bitcoin: Skype Cofounder Keeps Personal Wealth in Crypto, Intercom Chairman 'Firmly Jumps on the Bitcoin Wagon' | News - Bitcoin...

Cryptocurrency Market Trends And Opportunities By Types And Application In Grooming Regions; Edition 2020-2026 – The Daily Philadelphian

Coronavirus (COVID19) pandemic has impacted all over industries across the globe, and Cryptocurrency market is one of them. As the global market heads towards major recession, we are at In4Research, has published a brand-new latest research report which fully studies the impact of COVID-19 crisis on Cryptocurrency Industry and suggests possible actions to curtail them.Cryptocurrency Market report covers an in-depth analysis of the Cryptocurrency industry including statistical, quantitative, qualitative data points with emphasis on the market dynamics including the drivers, opportunities & restraints, market size, industry status and forecast, competition landscape and growth & revenue opportunities after COVID-19 pandemic.

In addition, this Cryptocurrency market research report covers both the global and regional markets with a detailed overview of the markets complete growth forecast. This research also sheds light on the markets wide-ranging competitive environment. The study also includes a dashboard overview of top businesses in both historical and current contexts, covering their active marketing strategies, recent developments & trends, and market contribution.

Request for a sample report to browse TOC, full company coverage & many more @https://www.in4research.com/sample-request/37

Cryptocurrency Market Segment Analysis:

The research report includes specific segments by Type and by Application. Each type provides information about the production during the forecast period of 2019 to 2026. The application segment also provides consumption during the forecast period of 2019 to 2026. Understanding the segments helps in identifying the importance of different factors that aid market growth.

Segmentation by Type:

Segmentation by Application:

There is coverage of market dynamics at the country level in the respective regional segments. The report comprises competitive analysis with a focus on key players and participants of the Cryptocurrency market covering in-depth data related to the competitive landscape, positioning, company profiles, key strategies adopted and product-profiling with a focus on market growth and potential.

Main Key Players:

Ask for more details or request a custom report from our industry experts @https://www.in4research.com/customization/37

Regional Analysis:

Cryptocurrency market breakdown data are shown at the regional level, to show the sales, revenue and growth by regions.

Impact of COVID-19 on Cryptocurrency Market

The report also contains the effect of the ongoing worldwide pandemic, i.e., COVID-19, on the Cryptocurrency Market and what the future holds for it. It offers an analysis of the impacts of the epidemic on the international market. The epidemic has immediately interrupted the requirement and supply series. The Cryptocurrency Market report also assesses the economic effect on firms and monetary markets. Futuristic Reports has accumulated advice from several delegates of this business and has engaged from the secondary and primary research to extend the customers with strategies and data to combat industry struggles throughout and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Get in touch to know more about the Impact of COVID-19 & Revenue Opportunities in Cryptocurrency Market:https://www.in4research.com/impactC19-request/37

Table of Contents:

Any Customization, Any Specific requirements? Speak with Analyst @ https://www.in4research.com/speak-to-analyst/37

FOR ALL YOUR RESEARCH NEEDS, REACH OUT TO US AT:

Contact Name: Rohan S.Email:[emailprotected]Phone: +1 (407) 768-2028

Go here to read the rest:
Cryptocurrency Market Trends And Opportunities By Types And Application In Grooming Regions; Edition 2020-2026 - The Daily Philadelphian

Ethereum was the most traded cryptocurrency in Q3 2020 with 1.1m average daily transactions, 3.5x more than bitcoin – HedgeWeek

As the world's second-largest cryptocurrency, ethereum witnessed impressive growth in 2020. Since the beginning of the year, the ctyptocurrency's price price surged by a remarkable 230 per cent, drawing more and more attention from investors in times of economic uncertainty caused by the Covid-19 outbreak.

According to data presented by AksjeBloggen.com, ethereum was the most traded cryptocurrency in the third quarter of 2020, with 1.1 million average daily transactions, 3.5 times more than bitcoin.

As the world's leading cryptocurrency, bitcoin witnessed over 319,000 average daily transactions between June and September, revealed the CoinMetrics data. Other leading cryptocurrencies saw less than a tenth of the daily volume of ethereum. Litecoin ranked third with 56,000 average transactions per day in this period. Dash, bitcoin cash, and monero followed with 25,100, 17,200, and 12,000 daily transactions, respectively.

The BitInfoCharts data revealed the number of ethereum transactions jumped significantly since the beginning of the year. In the first quarter of 2020, the number of average daily transactions amounted to 537,900. After a slight drop to 463,100 in March, transactions continued rising in the following months.

Statistics show the number of ethereum transactions per day increased by 610,000 between June and September, a 131 per cent jump in three months.

Besides impressive growth in price and the number of transactions, ethereum also witnessed a surge in market cap since the beginning of the year.

In December 2019, the combined value of all ethereum coins amounted to USD14.3 billion, revealed the CoinMarketCap data. After peaking at USD30.8 billion in February, Ethereum market capitalisation slumped by 58 per cent to USD12.7 billion in the second week of March.

However, the world's second-largest crypto coin quickly bounced back, with market cap recovering to USD25.2 billion in June.

The increasing trend continued in the third quarter of 2020, with the combined value of all ethereum coins in circulation peaking at USD53.8 billion in September, a 102 per cent jump in three months. Statistics show the market cap of the world's second-largest cryptocurrency stood at USD50 billion at the end of last week, almost 150 per cent jump year-on-year.

Visit link:
Ethereum was the most traded cryptocurrency in Q3 2020 with 1.1m average daily transactions, 3.5x more than bitcoin - HedgeWeek

Cryptocurrency Leaders and Blockchain Legends Meet in Puerto Rico to Address the Future of the Internet and the Global Economy November 16 -…

San Juan, Puerto Rico, Nov. 12, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- (via Blockchain Wire) -Crypto Mondays, Dorado Genesis and the Act 20/22/60 Special Committee of the Puerto Rico Chamber of Commerce, today announced their first joint event, THE FUTURE OF THE INTERNET AND THE GLOBAL ECONOMY, will be held on Monday, November 16, 2020. Cryptocurrency leaders will gather together for the 3-hour online event transmitted from Puerto Rico. The cryptocurrency and blockchain event will be powered by Zoom, starting at 5:00 PM AST as part of the Global Entrepreneurship Week.

Agenda topics will cover bitcoin, mining, stablecoin and staking fundamentals, no barrier entry, entrepreneurship opportunities in crypto, the 4th Technological Revolution and the future of the internet and the global economy.

Confirmed speakers include:

The event welcomes all attendees ranging from those new to the crypto world to expert crypto traders. Registration is available at https://futureofinternetandglobaleconomyzoom.eventbrite.com.

About the organizers:

Crypto Mondays seek to make Puerto Rico a world hub for investment and progress in blockchain, cryptocurrency, and digital innovation. For over 2 years, Crypto Mondays San Juan has brought some of the brightest technological forerunners on the planet to Puerto Rico to discuss topics ranging from banking and finance, to digital identities, privacy, small businesses and women entrepreneurial empowerment.

ACT 20/22/60 Special Committee of the Puerto Rico Chamber of Commerce serves as a bridge and liaison between the Act 20/22/60 community and the local business community by helping them integrate through professional, educational, networking and social activities.

Original post:
Cryptocurrency Leaders and Blockchain Legends Meet in Puerto Rico to Address the Future of the Internet and the Global Economy November 16 -...

America’s Nihilism blues | The Retriever – The Retriever

With the latest election cycle, the nation faced a lot of anxiety, a lot of hope and, perhaps least surprisingly, a lot of cynicism. In the wake of the 2016 election, as well as its preceding four years, there was an abundance of ill will directed both towards the electoral college, the White House and, more generally, the U.S. Government. Distrust was the name of the game for the Trump administration as far as left-leaning Americans were concerned, and this theme followed the nation right up until our present election.

Strangely enough, however, this distrust has recently translated from the left to the right in what has been perhaps the most ironic development of this current election cycle. Where in 2016, bereaved Clinton voters demanded both recounts and electoral dismantling galore, the same battle cries were heard from the Trump camp with even the president himself demanding via Twitter to STOP THE COUNT.

There is no denying that the past half-decade has brought out a great amount of distrust in the American people, both Democrats and Republicans alike. Clinton was, to the right, the very manifestation of the white-collar career politician which is so deplored by so many, and the drain the swamp slogan only capitalized on this governmental mistrust. Meanwhile, the Comey-Trump-Putin controversy, the impeachment of Trump, and the presence of Russia in the 2016 election cast a shadow over the Trump presidency which arguably colored the views of an entire generation. Yet this pessimism in higher powers is nothing new. In fact, a century beforehand, Friedrich Nietzsche was writing all about the consequences of losing faith both individually and institutionally.

In his seminal (and final) work The Will to Power, Nietzsche warned his audience of a growing belief within European society that he described as a vast generalization, the conclusion that there is no purpose in anything, a school of thought which he dubbed Nihilism or the disbelief in any and all values. Nihilism is, by its very nature, an antithesis to any and all schools of thought as its only belief is in the fundamental disbelief in all things. As Nietzsche explains it, all belief holds that something is true, and all forms of nihilism must necessarily reject any and all truths. As a result, a Nihilist thinker rejects all forms of philosophical code, save that there are no codes.

Nihilism, according to The Will To Power, is a natural evolution of Pessimism which, according to Nietzche, was the natural European response to the inescapable moralizing power of Christianity. Placing an importance both on moral truths and on religious unknowns led to a deeper tension between belief and disbelief, truth and falsehood, reality and fiction, until suddenly the whole question of belief seemed entirely meaningless. This whole debate leads to what Nietzsche calls exhaustion which alters the aspect and value of things. One who is exhausted is only able to belittle and disfigure the things that they see, finding no good values in anything.

In 1883, Europe had not even seen the worst of what the 20th century would have to offer. Yet after a global economic depression, a Spanish Flu pandemic, and two world wars the latter of which saw one of the most widespread and brutally inhumane campaigns in recent history Nietzsche and his clairvoyant treatise on Nihilism only became more and more relevant. Now, however, we see Nietzsche and his work come to fruition, not in Europe, but in the United States of America.

If European Nihilism erupted from the roots of Christianity, American Nihilism almost certainly arises from a similar faith in the government. As a country founded on the premise of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, the United States is a philosophical ideal of personal freedoms through government structures. Yet constantly, the government disproves this premise. From Watergate to Vietnam to the NSA spying on American citizens, the people of America are shown time and time again that their faith in the government is misplaced.

Distrust in human institutions has been a constant throughout human history. Both libertarianism and socialism find common ground in their mutual distrust of some kind of elite class. Yet the very basis of American democracy rests upon the grounds that the government works for the people. Indeed, the very nature of Bipartisanship helps to engender this distrust as citizens are consistently pitted against different versions of the same government a conservative White House or a liberal White House. Nietzsche might say that if the American people are not outright Nihilists, they approach the label closer and closer with every election.

It is rather easy when discussing these topics to get bogged down in the philosophical weeds, and an important part to consider in all of this is the fundamental day-to-day examples of societal failure that Americans have to come to terms with. A perfect example of the causes and effects of American Pessimism is the opioid crisis which has been ravaging America since at least the 90s. The causes lack of regulation on big Pharma, loss of blue-collar jobs, the economic recession of 08 are certainly important to consider, but what is most important is the effects that these things have on the average American. A quick Google search tells that from 1999 to 2018, 232,000 Americans died from an opioid overdosage. Taking into account both living addicts and families of addicts, it is easy to see through stats alone how opioids have ravaged America.

Yet one does not need statistics to see the impacts of the opioid epidemic nor any of the other issues America faces. Anybody living in rural America can see firsthand the impacts of opioid addiction on communities. The sight of panhandlers on the highway has become all too common, and the homeless tent cities that litter L.A. are similarly abundant. To the average American, these issues are quite visible, and the inescapability of it all contributes to a larger sense of pessimism throughout the country. Worse still, when so many problems within the nation remain unanswered through election after election, the question of values and faith becomes even more difficult to answer. If the government says it can fix the problems but the problems remain, why hold any faith in it at all?

In all this, Nietzsche is inexorably bound up. A seer for the modern anxious American, Nietzsche foresaw Trump and his strategic utilization of nostalgia Americana. According to Nietzsche, a nation faced with Nihilism is a nation that will recede, marred by all kinds of groping measures devised to preserve old institutions. It takes little mental gymnastics to connect this to the Make America Great Again slogan. In the context of Nietzsche, this American nostalgia is not just a desire for simplicity, but a desire to recede, to forget the doubts which now so plague America.

Similarly, Nietzsche foresaw the depressive effect which would become so dominant in a Nihilistic society and in the youths who must bear the burden of being born into said society: My friends, we had a hard time as youths; we even suffered from youth itself as though it were a serious disease. This is owing to the age in which we were born an age of enormous internal decay and disintegration which, with all its weakness and even with the best of its strength, is opposed to the spirit of youth. Indeed, born into a country fighting between tradition and progression, it is difficult for many young people to keep optimistic about it all.

Yet for all this gloom, there is a diamond hiding in the rough. Nietzsche himself declares that not all forms of Nihilism are inherently bad. In fact, he distinguishes between two types: active and passive. Whereas passive Nihilism is the willful and weary resignation to fate, active Nihilism is a powerful and destructive force, a radical disbelief in all forms of structure and a force of good: It may be a sign of strength; spiritual vigour may have increased to such an extent that the goals toward which man has marched hitherto (the convictions, articles of faith) are no longer suited to it.

This may all seem a bit abstract, but it is illustrated in all the many ways the youths of today have risen against the forces and structures which they deem unworthy of holding up. Grass-roots campaigns, marches against Washington, the abolishment of the electoral college, you name it for every structure within the American government, there are at least a sizable number of people fighting against it. Nietzche was something of a grouch himself, but if he saw the spirit of revolution today, who knows? He might be proud.

American faith is a rather difficult subject to write on due simply to the sheer scope of the American vision. The United States is home to a wide swathe of people, many of whom do not seem to agree on anything. The American experiment is, first and foremost, an experiment for its people, and when the people feel let down, their voices will always be heard. The American people might never be totally satisfied with their country. Yet if anything may be learned from Nietzsche, it is that this dissatisfaction should not be ignored or shrugged off, but embraced. If Nietzche was correct, then perhaps Nihilism at the doorstep of America is less a fear than it is the next step in the American experiment.

See the article here:
America's Nihilism blues | The Retriever - The Retriever

Can’t be objective on fascism – newagebd.net

John Pilger. Defend Wikileaks

IT IS not, I think, humanly possible for any reporter to be completely objective, for we are all to some degree prisoners of our education, travel, reading the sum total of our experience. Thus spoke Edward Murrow, the legendary American journalist who narrated from the European battlefield the horrors of Hitlers Germany for unprepared radio audiences back home.

The assignment over, he went on to fight the menace of McCarthyism dogging American democracy. It was an object lesson in how not to balance the bigotry of states with the frailties of a beleaguered opposition, which journalists often seek to do.

In recent days, in the mould of Murrow, Robert Fisk and John Pilger, from the United Kingdom and Australia respectively, have been the gold standard for discarding nationalist blinkers that journalists are so prone to donning. Both have shouldered the burden of combative reporting that has put Western democracies in the dock with evidence-based charges of shoring up war criminals, overthrowing secular governments and decimating proud civilisations around the world.

Fisk passed away recently, leaving a void in tracking the loot and plunder of the Middle East and Africa. Pilgers probing journalism traversed a wider span, which he crowned with the important TV documentary The Coming War on China. The film provides compelling evidence of a bipartisan American military build-up in the Pacific, replete with dozens of fortified bases rippling with nuclear weapons. India is being lured to join the dangerous game. In the remaining days of Donald Trump, or even after he demits office, the world will be a fraught place. Joe Bidens likely team is tipped to include warmongers. Susan Rice had advocated the destruction of Libya to the Obama administration.

Not all journalists come out unscathed from a pushback by their quarries. Mordechai Vanunu and Julian Assange continue to suffer for exposing the slimy backstage that runs the global show. Edward Snowden, in asylum in Moscow, is reportedly seeking Russian citizenship while keeping his American passport, if the option exists.

As neoliberal systems built on a mealy-mouthed promise of democracy flounder, we are least likely to hear of mea culpa. The spectacular promise of the free world has proved to be a myth as can be seen from the silence on the outrages being perpetrated in Palestine and Kashmir under the banner of democracy.

It is likely the West would blame the global mess on China and Russia. This portends tense prospects ahead. South Asia had an excellent chance of securing itself against the looming mayhem, but India has decided to hitch its wagon to the global chaos on the cards. The logic of India spurning Chinas hand in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, for example, is curious as countries like Japan and Australia suspended their deep differences with Beijing to be part of an economic pact. It seems Indias aloofness springs from a need to use the tensions in Ladakh to beef up narrow nationalism at home.

The untranslatable Urdu metaphor for a very slight difference between two situations or things is unnis-bees ka farq, literally the difference between 19 and 20. Sitar wizard Vilayat Khan would advise his students to play at 19, if their preparedness was for 20. (Unnis bajao, bees ki tayyari hai agar.) A Pakistani human rights defender was visiting Delhi when I asked him to compare the threat to democracy in his country with India. Without demure, he said: Unnis-ikkees ka farq hai. (The approximate difference is of 1921). I asked him to explain the interesting departure from the metaphor. The visitor beamed and said: If we describe the difference between the situations in India and Pakistan as very narrow unnis-bees ka farq our Indian friends would feel offended.

Indeed, both countries have been in and out of trouble with autocrats, initially, on account of Cold War battle lines but currently in their competition to woo support from the West. In the early days of independence, Indias anti-communist slant at home was shaped by Nehrus proximity to the British Commonwealth, an idea promoted by London for post-colonial societies to keep a safe distance from Moscow, relic of Britains favourite bogeyman called Russophobia.

Commonwealth ka daas hai Nehru, maar le saathi jaaney na paae, thundered partisan poet Majrooh Sultanpuri. (Nehru is a slave of the Commonwealth, beat him up.) For his insouciance Majrooh was thrown in jail from where he continued to write his fabled movie songs for Mehboob Khans Andaz. Actor Balraj Sahni, also a member of the communist party, was granted bail to complete his pending movies.

In Pakistan, the crackdown on democracy was led by a military apparatus of which Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was a part before he crossed the street to become a populist leader, while still balancing the political left with the cultural right.

In India, support for and resistance to Indira Gandhis authoritarian rule was similarly structured along Cold War battle lines. Pro-Soviet communists supported the Emergency, while pro-China groups threw their weight behind the pro-American Hindutva leaders and socialists inspired by Willy Brandt. It was a curious mix of alignments in both countries with its inevitable outcome.

Indira Gandhi defeated, the Indian left were handed a pacifier that kept them self-absorbed for almost three decades in Tripura and West Bengal. They thus abandoned vast swathes for depredation by the right. Luckily, recent elections in Bihar have shown that the left has retrieved an older reliable script to shore up democratic alliances rather than seeking to lead them. The wafer-thin difference in votes between the right-wing victors and democratic opposition is a reminder that opposition parties can go beyond opportunistic electoral alliances to forge a grounded strategy to defeat fascism. The fractious opposition in Pakistan can also learn a tentative lesson from Bihar. The option to not fight the fight collectively doesnt exist as Edward Murrow told us from the battlefields near and afar.

Dawn.com, November 17. Jawed Naqvi is Dawns correspondent in Delhi.

See the original post here:
Can't be objective on fascism - newagebd.net

Letters to the editor: Veterans Day; presidential election; affordable housing; President Trump – The Daily Camera

Rosemary OConnor: Veterans Day: A personal story of remembrance

This week we mark Veterans Day. My father was one of the crew of a B-29 bomber in the Pacific Ocean during World War II. After one particular mission, heading back to their base on the island of Tinian, my dads airplane was dangerously low on fuel.

Fortunately for my dads crew and plane, just weeks earlier, the Marines had managed to take the island of Iwo Jima. That battle took more than a month of fierce fighting, cost almost 7,000 U.S. Marines their lives, and wounded more than 20,000 more.

If not for their efforts and sacrifice, my fathers plane would have had to ditch in Pacific Ocean and likely none of the crew would have survived. As my dads plane landed safely on Iwo Jima, first one and then another of the planes four engines sputtered and quit for lack of fuel.

So atVeteransDayevery year, while I am grateful to all thevets, I especially think of those Marines who saved my dads life. I can never thank them enough.

Rosemary OConnor

Boulder

Rex Van Gorden: Presidential election: Deep-rooted issues remain

Can Joe Biden heal the divide in our nation? Dont expect it. Trumpism is alive and well!

As is disinformation. Donald Trumps hard core base relied on Trump, Fox News, conservative print and social media and radio for their information. This led to the Dunning-Kruger effect, a type of cognitive bias that causes people to overestimate their knowledge. Inside the echo chamber of opinions Trump supporters were ill informed and overestimated their understanding of the issues.

As is xenophobia. Trumps America-first rhetoric had its roots in xenophobia. Trump supporters hatred of Hispanic and Muslim immigrants were dog whistled out into open hostility: Go back to where you came from.

As is homophobia. Homophobic religious leaders attract large followings even though some of them are secretly homosexual, bisexual, or behave in ways contrary to their teachings.

As is misogyny. Trump is the epitome of someone who objectifies and has a low opinion of women. Even some women were drawn to Trumps misogynistic language and behavior.

As is evangelical fervor. Many evangelicals believed Trump would reverse the rising tide of secularism. Some are one issue, pro-life ideologues. Make America Great Again answered their prayers of a return of the good old days.

As is zero-sum thinking. Many Trump supporters believe that the world, their lives, is a zero-sum game where someone elses gain comes at their expense. They live in the delusion that their failure to thrive is the fault of someone less worthy. They hate those who they think are at fault: immigrants, blacks, women, liberals, elitists, globalists

As is hypocrisy. Rural Trump supporters hold Democrats and socialists in the same regard and contempt, yet they lobby for public welfare. Government subsidies make up 40% of farm income.

As is racism. White supremacists are emboldened.

Rex Van Gorden

Boulder

Susan A. Lythgoe: Affordable housing: The needs are still great

Voters have cast their ballots, and now its time for elected officials to come together and work on urgent housing needs in our communities. Flatirons Habitat for Humanity cannot express strongly enough how critical housing protections are that are set to expire, putting families at risk across the area.

Throughout Colorado, the need for a safe and decent home has been critically important during the COVID-19 pandemic. We need our elected officials to take action now to support policies that will ensure safe, decent, and affordable homes now and for years to come.

We areaskingCongress to pass a set of priorities to provide immediate housing relief, including mortgage and rental payment assistance that will help stave off a looming eviction and foreclosure crisisthatwill disproportionatelyimpactcommunitiesof color.

We are alsocalling on newly elected and reelected policymakers at all levels of government to treat housing as infrastructure and economic recovery as they set their 2021 legislative agendas by including robust funding to buildand preserveaffordable homesin our communities and to ensureequitable access to healthy housing and communities of opportunity.

Habitat is committed to continuingourhousing advocacybyworking with elected officials at all levels of government tocreateand implement policy solutions that will enable access to affordable homes for 10 million people in the U.S.and here in our community.

We believe that no one should have to choose between putting food on the table or having a safe place to sleep at night because the cost of housing is too high. It is critical that we get this right. We challenge every lawmaker to acknowledge the individuals and families in our communities who need greater housing stability and do something about it.

Susan A. Lythgoe

Lafayette

David Gurarie: President Trump: He consistently attacks journalists

When Bob Woodward revealed how Trump misled the public about COVID-19, Trump attacked Woodward. When the New York Times broke the story about Trumps tax returns, he labelled it fake news. We all have different political views, but everyone should be concerned about Trumps hostility toward journalists.

Right now, the Trump administration is trying to extradite WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and sentence him to 175 years in prison for helping break important stories about war crimes and civilian casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Trump insults reporters who challenge him. He revokes White House access for those asking tough questions. When he doesnt like the news, he blames the messenger. The Assange case would set a precedent that could easily be applied to any media outlet working with inside sources. Imagine if Trump had the power to prosecute the Times for informing the public about his hidden finances. Thats a scary thought.

David Gurarie

Boulder

Link:
Letters to the editor: Veterans Day; presidential election; affordable housing; President Trump - The Daily Camera

The Korean War’s Forgotten Lessons on the Evil of Intervention – CounterPunch

Photograph Source: Jonathan Cutrer CC BY 2.0

This year is the 70th anniversary of the start of the Korean War, a conflict from which Washington policymakers learned nothing. Almost 40,000 American soldiers died in that conflict that should have permanently vaccinated the nation against the folly and evil of foreign intervention. Instead, the war was retroactively redefined. As Barack Obama declared in 2013, That war was no tie. Korea was a victory.

The war began with what Harry Truman claimed was a surprise invasion on June 25, 1950, by the North Korean army across the dividing line with South Korea that was devised after World War Two. But the U.S. government had ample warnings of the pending invasion. According to the late Justin Raimondo, founder of antiwar.com, the conflict actually started with a series of attacks by South Korean forces, aided by the U.S. military: From 1945-1948, American forces aided [South Korean President Syngman] Rhee in a killing spree that claimed tens of thousands of victims: the counterinsurgency campaign took a high toll in Kwangju, and on the island of Cheju-do where as many as 60,000 people were murdered by Rhees US-backed forces.

The North Korean army quickly routed both South Korean and U.S. forces. A complete debacle was averted after Gen. Douglas MacArthur masterminded a landing of U.S. troops at Inchon. After he routed the North Korean forces, MacArthur was determined to continue pushing northward regardless of the danger of provoking a much broader war.

By the time the U.S. forces drove the North Korean army back across the border between the two Koreas, roughly 5,000 American troops had been killed. The Pentagon had plenty of warning that the Chinese would intervene if the U.S. Army pushed too close to the Chinese border. But the euphoria that erupted after Inchon blew away all common sense and drowned out the military voices who warned of a catastrophe. One U.S. Army colonel responded to a briefing on the Korea situation in Tokyo in 1950 by storming out and declaring, Theyre living in a goddamn dream land.

The Chinese military attack resulted in the longest retreat in the history of Americas armed forces a debacle that was valorized by allusion in the 1986 Clint Eastwood movie, Heartbreak Ridge. By 1951, the Korean War had become intensely unpopular in the United States more unpopular than the Vietnam War ever was. At least the war, which Truman insisted on mislabeling as a police action, destroyed the presidency of the man who launched it. By the time a ceasefire was signed in mid 1953, almost 40,000 Americans had been killed in a conflict that ended with borders similar to those at the start of the war.

Perhaps the biggest disaster of the Korean war was that intellectuals and foreign-policy experts succeeded in redefining the Korean conflict as an American victory. As Georgetown University professor Derek Leebaert noted in his book Magic and Mayhem, What had been regarded as a bloody stalemate transformed itself in Washingtons eyes; ten years later it had become an example of a successful limited war. Already by the mid-1950s, elite opinion began to surmise that it had been a victory. Leebaert explained, Images of victory in Korea shaped the decision to escalate in 1964-65 helping to explain why America pursued a war of attrition. Even worse, the notion that America has never lost a war remained part of the national myth, and the notion of having prevailed in Korea became a justification for going big in Vietnam. But as Leebaert noted, in Vietnam, [the U.S. Army] had forgotten everything it had learned about counterinsurgency in Korea as well.

When the American media noted the 70th anniversary of the start of the war this past June, they paid little or no attention to the wars dark side. The media ignored perhaps the wars most important lesson: the U.S. government has almost unlimited sway to hide its own war crimes.

During the Korean War, Americans were deluged with official pronouncements that the U.S. military was taking all possible steps to protect innocent civilians. Because the evils of communism were self-evident, few questions arose about how the United States was thwarting Red aggression. When a U.S. Senate subcommittee appointed in 1953 by Sen. Joseph McCarthy investigated Korean War atrocities, the committee explicitly declared that war crimes were defined as those acts committed by enemy nations.

In 1999, forty-six years after the cease fire in Korea, the Associated Press exposed a 1950 massacre of Korean refugees at No Gun Ri. U.S. troops drove Koreans out of their village and forced them to remain on a railroad embankment. Beginning on July 25, 1950, the refugees were strafed by U.S. planes and machine guns over the following three days. Hundreds of people, mostly women and children, were killed. The 1999 AP story was widely denounced by American politicians and some media outlets as a slander on American troops.

The Pentagon promised an exhaustive investigation. In January 2001, the Pentagon released a 300-page report purporting to prove that the No Gun Ri killings were merely an unfortunate tragedy caused by trigger-happy soldiers frightened by approaching refugees.

Bill Clinton announced his regret that Korean civilians lost their lives at No Gun Ri. In an interview, he was asked why he used regret instead of apology. He declared, I believe that the people who looked into it could not conclude that there was a deliberate act, decided at a high-enough level in the military hierarchy, to acknowledge that, in effect, the Government had participated in something that was terrible. Clinton specified that there was no evidence of wrongdoing high-enough in the chain of command in the Army to say that, in effect, the Government was responsible.

But the atrocities against civilians had been common knowledge among U.S. troops 50 years earlier. As Charles Hanley, Sang-Hun Choe, and Martha Mendoza noted in their 2001 book, The Bridge at No Gun Ri, the Pentagon in 1952 withdrew official endorsement from RKOs One Minute to Zero, a Korean War movie in which an Army colonel played by actor Robert Mitchum orders artillery fire on a column of refugees. The Pentagon fretted that this sequence could be utilized for anti-American propaganda and banned the film from being shown on U.S. military bases.

In 2005, Sahr Conway-Lanz, a Harvard University doctoral student, discovered a letter in the National Archives from the U.S. ambassador to Korea, John Muccio, sent to Assistant Secretary of State Dean Rusk on the day the No Gun Ri massacre commenced. Muccio summarized a new policy from a meeting between U.S. military and South Korean officials: If refugees do appear from north of U.S. lines they will receive warning shots, and if they then persist in advancing they will be shot. The new policy was radioed to Army units around Korea on the morning the No Gun Ri massacre began. The U.S. military feared that North Korean troops might be hiding amidst the refugees. The Pentagon initially claimed that its investigators never saw Muccios letter but it was in the specific research file used for its report.

Conway-Lanzs 2006 book Collateral Damage: Americans, Noncombatant Immunity, and Atrocity after World War IIquoted an official U.S. Navy history of the first six months of the Korean War stating that the policy of strafing civilians was wholly defensible. An official Army history noted, Eventually, it was decided to shoot anyone who moved at night. A report for the aircraft carrier USS Valley Forge justified attacking civilians because the Army insisted that groups of more than eight to ten people were to be considered troops, and were to be attacked.

In 2007, the Army recited its original denial: No policy purporting to authorize soldiers to shoot refugees was ever promulgated to soldiers in the field. But the Associated Press exposed more dirt from the U.S. archives: More than a dozen documents in which high-ranking U.S. officers tell troops that refugees are fair game, for example, and order them to shoot all refugees coming across river were found by the AP in the investigators own archived files after the 2001 inquiry. None of those documents was disclosed in the Armys 300-page public report. A former Air Force pilot told investigators that his plane and three others strafed refugees at the same time of the No Gun Ri massacre; the official report claimed that all pilots interviewed knew nothing about such orders. Evidence also surfaced of massacres like No Gun Ri. On September 1, 1950, the destroyer USS DeHaven, at the Armys insistence, fired on a seaside refugee encampment at Pohang, South Korea. Survivors say 100 to 200 people were killed.

Slaughtering civilians en masse became routine procedure after the Chinese army intervened in the Korean war in late 1950. MacArthur spoke of turning North Korean-held territory into a desert. The U.S. military eventually expanded its definition of a military target to any structure that could shelter enemy troops or supplies. Gen. Curtis LeMay summarized the achievements: We burned down every town in North Korea and some in South Korea, too. A million civilians may have been killed during the war. A South Korean government Truth and Reconciliation Commission uncovered many previously unreported atrocities and concluded that American troops killed groups of South Korean civilians on 138 separate occasions during the Korean War, the New York Times reported.

Truth delayed is truth defused. The Pentagon strategy on Korean War atrocities succeeded because it left facts to the historians, not the policymakers. The truth about No Gun Ri finally slipped out ten presidencies later. Even more damaging, the Rules of Engagement for killing Korean civilians were covered up for four more U.S. wars. If U.S. policy for slaying Korean refugees had been exposed during that war, it might have curtailed similar killings in Vietnam (many of which were not revealed until decades after the war).

Former congressman and decorated Korean War veteran Pete McCloskey (R-Calif.) warned, The government will always lie about embarrassing matters. The same shenanigans permeate other U.S. wars. The secrecy and deceit surrounding U.S. warring has had catastrophic consequences in this century. The Bush administration exploited the 9/11 attacks to justify attacking Iraq in 2003, and it was not until 2016 that the U.S. government revealed documents exposing the Saudi governments role in financing the 9/11 hijackers (15 of 19 whom were Saudi citizens). The Pentagon covered up the vast majority of U.S. killings of Iraqi civilians until Bradley Manning and WikiLeaks exposed them in 2010. There are very likely reams of evidence of duplicity and intentional slaughter of civilians in U.S. government files on its endlessly confused and contradictory Syrian intervention.

When politicians or generals appear itching to pull the United States into another foreign war, remember that truth is routinely the first casualty. It is naive to expect a government that recklessly slays masses of civilians to honestly investigate itself and announce its guilt to the world. Self-government is a mirage if Americans do not receive enough information to judge killings committed in their name.

This essay was originally published by Future of Freedom Foundation.

Read more:
The Korean War's Forgotten Lessons on the Evil of Intervention - CounterPunch

How Much Programming Has Changed Over the Last Decade – Interesting Engineering

Software programming has grown exponentially in complexity and volume over the years, but especially so since 2010. But why?

Read on to find out.

RELATED: WHAT CAN WEB DEVELOPERS AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS LEARN FROM EACH OTHER?

The level of difficulty of anything new you learn is dictated by your dedication to the task, willingness to apply your knowledge and make mistakes, curiosity about the subject, and the amount of time you invest. For this reason, programming is not that much harder to learn than any other new skill -- like, say, learning a foreign language.

In fact, with programming that is effectively what you are doing, except the language learned is used to "speak" to computers rather than human beings.

If you are interested in becoming a programmer, or fancy a career change, learning to code will open up a whole new world of opportunities for you. You will be able to work on fascinating projects and, often, command a very healthy income.

In fact, any of the various disciplines of computer programming have shown very strong growth in demand over the last few years.

However, there is a barrier to entry for a career in coding -- you will need to know how to code. While intimidating from the off, especially if you have no experience in it, coding is not that hard to learn (honest).

You will need to be patient and take your time going from basic principles to learning more advanced elements of any coding language you choose to learn. There are plenty of resources out there for you to learn to code which can either be paid for (usually the most structured way to learn), or completely free, like YouTube tutorials, etc.

If you are a complete beginner we thoroughly recommend you check out apps like SoloLearn to get you started. This platform offers a wide suite of popular language to learn and the courses are very well structured and easy to follow.

It offers both free and paid for subscriptions, and you are awarded certificates of completion at the end of each course! Win, win.

By carving out the time you need to dedicate to learning a particular language, you will get to grips with the basics in no time.

One piece of advice that will help speed up your learning experience is to create your own "pet project". This can be anything from a program to help plan your finances, to making a simple game -- it really doesn't matter.

By forcing yourself to put the theory of computer language into practice you will rapidly learn through trial and error. If you do get stuck, resources like Stack Overflow is packed with example code for different functions, which you can modify to fit your needs.

However, it is highly recommended you try to create a solution yourself first, even if you don't always have to reinvent the wheel.

In fact, as a beginner, it is often very useful to reverse engineer existing code to see how it works.

If you are a complete novice, also to learn to walk before you can run. Choose simpler languages like HTML, PHP, etc to get a feel for the profession.

While the "grammar" and "vocabulary" of different computer programming language does vary, the basic "logic" of writing commands to make something happen are transferrable between them all. You just need to learn how to "say" the commands in that particular language.

Learning to code is great fun when you get into it, so don't waste another second procrastinating. Get stuck in!

As we have previously mentioned, learning to code isn't that hard. Just pick a language to learn and make sure you dedicate the time to master it.

Most importantly, make sure you build something at the same time as learning a new language too. The benefits of a "pet project" when learning any new skill are beyond measure.

But again, just like choosing a language to learn, don't bite off more than you can chew. Start with something simple like a basic word game, calculator, etc.

You can then start to ramp up the complexity over time as you learn new facets of a particular language.

Let's take an example "learning path" for a programmer.

Let's say you, as a novice programmer, want to automate some MS Office documents? Perhaps you want to make an MS Excel spreadsheet print out a report in MS Word?

This kind of functionality may require you to learn some Visual Basic for Applications (VBA). From there you may find you start to tinker around with databases on MS Access or using SQL databases as databases offer much more scope for automation than spreadsheets alone.

Once you have a robust handle on databases, you may wish to place your new document automation system online or gather data from customers via a website instead of manually entering them.

Not only that, but as you come up with more ideas, and you may want to add more and more functionality to your system.

So, you could start building SQL databases online and then discover you need to master HTML and PHP to query, insert and update records, etc on the SQL database through a webpage for it to actually work.

From there you could soon notice that that other programming languages, like Javascript, Python, etc offer better results for functions you wish to include in your project. Along the way, you might also notice that you need CSS to make your website look nice!

In no time at all, you have suddenly developed working knowledge, perhaps even mastery, of HTML, SQL, PHP, Javascript, Python, CSS, VBA all because you, initially, wanted to automate documents through a website!

This kind of path is very organic, and you will slowly build on your knowledge over time as you hit problems you want to solve. It really will be a running battle of trial and error, major successes, and some abject failures!

Just stick to your guns and try different solutions to problems until one works. Such a process will also teach the limitations and benefits of particular coding languages over the others.

Not to labor the point, but programming is really not that hard. You just need to have a "purpose" behind you learning to code.

Just give it a go! Who knows, you may find your true passion in life?

If you are tempted to start your journey through the world of programming you need to also be aware that it is a rapidly developing field. None less so than over the last decade.

Even compared to just ten years ago, professional coders are managing a lotmore code. Not only that, but they have to handle more languages for more platforms than ever.

This amazing finding came from a recent report issued by Dimensional Research on behalf ofSourcegroup (a company that specializes in universal code search), who polled 500 North American software developers to find issues in code complexity and management. They found that those programmers polled, agreed that software has generally gotten bigger, more complex, and much more important since 2010.

Some of the major highlights from the poll included the following findings:

Today, programmers are handling much more code than before

As we have already highlighted above, there is much more code around today than in 2010. That might not come as a surprise, but what does is the actual volume of overall that has changed.

More than half of the respond developers reported a growth of more than 100-fold! Some of this can be explained by an increase in complexity, as well as, the need to serve various platforms too.

This is especially true for web developers who need to accommodate different platforms, libraries, and dependencies. Not to mention supportedarchitectures, devices, languages, repositories, and more.

Many companies are now "tech" companies

Another reason for the increase in code volume is the fact that many companies have since evolved into tech companies over the last decade. Especially those not generally considered as real "tech" companies.

Insurance companies, retail businesses, and even food and beverage companies have embraced the need to develop apps and other software solutions of their own.

91 percent of the poll's respondents said that theirnon-technology company operates more like a technology company than it did back in 2010. Again, those in know should not be surprised by this at all.

Even companies likeWalmart Labssponsor open source technology conferences and deliveringpresentations, after all.

So, if your interest has been piqued by the very real challenge, and potential reward, that learning to code can offer, now is as good a time as any to get started. The next decade and more are going to see an ever-increasing demand for programmers, so it might be a savvy choice for an undergraduate or seasoned professional looking to shift gears.

If you are planning on going for it, let us be the first to wish you all the very best of luck! You will not regret it.

More:
How Much Programming Has Changed Over the Last Decade - Interesting Engineering

Jonas Bonr and the Reactive Manifesto II — ADTmag – ADT Magazine

Jonas Bonr and the Reactive Manifesto II

It's been about seven years since Jonas Bonr, co-founder and CTO of Lightbend and creator of the Akka project, first published "The Reactive Manifesto" with contributions from Dave Farley, Roland Kuhn, and Martin Thompson. He and his colleagues used that document to provide an accessible and succinct definition of reactive systems--software developed using message-driven and event-driven approaches to achieve the resiliency, scalability, and responsiveness required for cloud-native applications.

"We needed a way to explain what we we're talking about that wasn't full of geeky buzzwords and ended up just being confusing," Bonr told me at the time. "The manifesto distills things down to the essence of these new applications, which are being built right now, and provided a vocabulary that would allow developers to talk about these things."

This week, under the auspices of the Linux Foundation and the newly formed Reactive Foundation, Bonr and a veritable crowd of collaborators published an updated and expanded version of that document, entitled "The Reactive Principle." The press announcement characterized the new manifesto as a complement to the original that "incorporates the ideas, techniques, and patterns from both Reactive Programming and Reactive Systems into a set of practical principles, to apply Reactive to cloud native applications to realize the efficiencies of building for and running on the cloud."

"One of the problems with reactive is that it has been a little bit diluted over the years," Bonr explained during a recent Zoom interview. "People slapped 'reactive' on almost anything. Some things are actually reactive and some are variations. And some things called reactive aren't really living up to what we think it is. And that's why I felt it was important to get together with a lot of people, not just me, to define what reactive means and sort of breathe some new life into it."

The new document is the product of a collaboration among leading minds in the Reactive and broader distributed computing communities. Along with Bonr, the list of collaborators includes Roland Kuhn, Ben Christensen, Sergey Bykov, Clement Escoffier, Peter Vlugter, Josh Long, Ben Hindman, Vaughn Vernon, James Roper, Michael Behrendt, Kresten Thorup, Colin Breck, Allard Buijze, Derek Collison, Viktor Klang, Ben Hale, Steve Gury, Tyler Jewell, Ryland Degnan, James Ward, and Stephan Ewen.

The original manifesto was intentionally short and designed to be easily digestible ("Even CIOs read it," Bonr said.) The new "Principles" document is as rich as the original was lean. Among other things, it lays out the eight principles an application must embrace in its design, its architecture, and even its programming model to be considered Reactive:

"The Reactive Principles" also offers sets of design principles for cloud-native and edge-native applications, as well as patterns that can help codify and apply the Reactive Principles to applications and systems.

The Reactive Foundation, launched last year with founding members Alibaba Cloud, Facebook, Lightbend, VMWare, and VLINGO, is a non-profit organization established to provide a formal open governance model and neutral ecosystem for creating open-source Reactive projects. The group is a top-level project within the Linux Foundation that it is "dedicated to being a catalyst for advancing a new landscape of technologies, standards, and vendors."

Bonr was set to unveil "The Reactive Principles" today during his keynote presentation at the Reactive Summit 2020 virtual event.

"The cloud needs a programming model that brings the same reliability, predictability, and scalability at the application layer that Kubernetes has brought to the infrastructure layer," Bonr said in a statement.

You can find an early edition of "The Reactive Manifesto" online. At least you could as of this writing. It's worth a look before digging into the new document, which, though much longer, is just as accessible.

The Reactive Foundation also announced that two open-source projects, R2DBC and Reactive Streams, have joined the foundation, and that a newly formed Technical Oversight Committee is evaluating additional open-source project candidates. The R2DBC project brings Reactive programming APIs to relational databases in an effort to provide a better alternative to JDBC and the "blocking" issues it creates for SQL databases in Reactive Systems. Reactive Streams is an initiative to provide a standard for asynchronous stream processing with non-blocking back pressure, encompassing runtime environments (JVM and JavaScript) as well as network protocols.

The first project of the foundation, RSocket, is an implementation of Reactive Streams that provides a message-driven binary protocol for use on byte stream transports ,such as TCP and WebSockets.

Posted by John K. Waters on 11/10/2020 at 7:53 AM

Read this article:
Jonas Bonr and the Reactive Manifesto II -- ADTmag - ADT Magazine