Apple CEO likely to talk immigration, encryption at White House: report – The Hill

Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely address issues such as immigration and encryption Monday during his White House meeting for Technology Week, Axios reported.

About 18 CEOs also including Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and two dozen more business experts are expected to attend the event and help offer insight about how thegovernments information technology systems could be updated and modernized.

Cook is reportedly slated to attend a session called H-1B/immigration.

Cook has been a longtime advocate of the merits and economic value immigrants provide for the American economy, contrasting largely with President Trump and some of his top advisers views that immigrants are taking jobs from American workers and hurting the economy.

Following the San Bernardino, Calif., shootings in December 2015, Cook refused to provide the FBI with a backdoor encryption to open the terrorists iPhones. Cook argued that if he provided this opening, it would compromise customer's privacy and security and create a precedent.

Trump had urged people to boycott Apple at the time, pointing to Cooks lack of cooperation with the investigation.

Cook also is expected to bring up ways to improve how veterans receive medical care as well as human rights both in the U.S. and abroad.

Jared Kushner's Office of American Innovation organized these tech meetings.

Trump and Vice President Pence are expected to pop by the working sessions.

Kushner, his wife, Ivanka Trump, and many of President Trump's top aides like Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly and Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney are expected to attend.

See the original post:
Apple CEO likely to talk immigration, encryption at White House: report - The Hill

After Terror Attacks, Britain Moves to Police the Web – New York Times

In Germany, lawmakers are pushing ahead with fines of up to 50 million euros, or $56 million, if Silicon Valley companies do not limit how online hate speech circulates on their social networks.

Recent legislation already gives Britains law enforcement officials some of the worlds strongest powers to read and monitor online chatter from potential extremists.

Now the countrys politicians want to go further.

In its electoral manifesto and in speeches by senior politicians, the governing Conservative Party outlined proposals to offer security officials more ways to keep tabs on potential extremists. Theresa May, the prime minister, raised the issue at a recent Group of 7 meeting and in talks with President Emmanuel Macron of France.

But if the proposals are pushed through, there will be costs.

The Conservatives now rule with a minority in Parliament, and will most likely have to rely on other parties for support. That may necessitate compromise or horse trading.

And the additional measures could hurt Britains effort to court new investment from the global tech sector as it prepares to leave the European Union.

Mrs. May had a simple message after the recent deadly terrorist attack in London.

We need to do everything we can at home to reduce the risks of extremism online, she told the British public, echoing a similar message by her government after a previous attack in Manchester.

Part of that plan is to demand that companies such as Apple and Facebook allow Britains national security agencies access to peoples encrypted messages on services like FaceTime and WhatsApp.

These services use so-called end-to-end encryption, meaning that a persons message is scrambled when it is sent from a device, so that it becomes indecipherable to anyone but its intended recipient.

British officials, like their American counterparts, would like to create a digital backdoor to this technology.

Yet an opening for intelligence agencies, experts warn, would also allow others, including foreign governments and hacking groups, to potentially gain access to peoples digital messages.

It would also most likely induce terrorist groups to move to other forms of encrypted communication, while leaving everyday Britons and others traveling in the country susceptible to online hacks.

If the British government asks for a special key like this, what stops other governments from asking for the same access? said Nigel Smart, a cryptology professor at the University of Bristol. You need end-to-end encryption because it stops anyone from listening in.

British lawmakers say law enforcement and intelligence agencies need such access to foil potential terrorist plots.

But Facebook and others respond that they already provide information on peoples online activities, when required, including the I.P. address a pseudo fingerprint for digital devices of machines from where messages are sent.

And in a letter sent to British politicians in late 2015 just as an earlier debate about tech regulation was bubbling to the surface Apple made its views clear.

We believe it would be wrong to weaken security for hundreds of millions of law-abiding customers so that it will also be weaker for the very few who pose a threat, the company said.

British politicians have another target in policing the internet: extremist messages that are circulated on Facebook, YouTube and other social media.

While other countries have taken steps to control how such material is shared across the web, tech executives and campaigners say that Britain has gone further than almost any western country, often putting the onus on companies to determine when to take down content that while offensive, does not represent illegal or violent messaging.

Id like to see the industry go further and faster in not only removing online terrorist content, but stopping it going up in the first place, Amber Rudd, the countrys home secretary, said before meeting with tech executives this year. At the time, she called on them to take further steps to counter such extremist material.

Mrs. May also had discussions with Mr. Macron, the French president, last week about holding tech companies legally liable if they fail to remove content.

The British governments stance has put tech companies in the difficult position of having to determine what should, and should not, be allowed online.

Britains freedom of expression laws are not as far-reaching as those in the United States, allowing British lawmakers to push for greater control over what is circulated across the web.

In recent months, companies like Facebook and Twitter say that they have taken additional steps to remove illegal extremist material from their social networks, and are giving users ways to flag potentially offensive content.

That includes Facebook announcing on Thursday that it would use artificial intelligence technology to flag, and remove, inappropriate content. Google has also provided financing to nonprofit organizations aimed at countering such hate speech online.

Some other European lawmakers have warned that too-strict limits on what can be shared across the web may hamper freedom of speech, a touchy subject for many people who grew up behind the Soviet-era iron curtain.

For me, freedom of expression is a basic fundamental right, Andrus Ansip, the digital chief at the European Commission, the executive arm of the European Union, said in an interview this year. Nobody wants to see a Ministry of Truth.

Follow Mark Scott on Twitter @markscott82.

A version of this article appears in print on June 20, 2017, on Page B1 of the New York edition with the headline: After Attacks in Britain, A Move to Police the Web.

See original here:
After Terror Attacks, Britain Moves to Police the Web - New York Times

Why the last thing open source needs is more corporate oversight … – TechRepublic

Image: iStockphoto/DragonImages

According to a new Black Duck survey, developers can't get enough of open source, ramping up open source adoption by 60% last year. Why the uptick? A whopping 84% cited superior cost savings, ease-of-access, and no vendor lock-in.

That same survey, however, would have us believe that developers live in fear of open source, shuddering at open source vulnerabilities exposing their code, open source "infecting" proprietary software, and more.

Across town, other developers have started creating new, hybrid licenses to help pay the rent for their open source efforts, even as the volume of open source code continues to grow.

In other words, something is amiss.

We've spent decades wringing our hands over the need for open source review boards to govern the intake and release of open source code, yet that code hasn't waited. And despite pleading poverty for years, the open source developer population keeps defying Malthus, cranking out code (and, apparently, getting paid for it). Can we put the fear-mongering to rest?

It's not as if the fear-mongering has worked. Quite the opposite. Open source has become so pervasive that, as Cloudera co-founder Mike Olson declared: "No dominant platform-level software infrastructure has emerged in the last ten years in closed-source, proprietary form." That's "none" as in "zero." Indeed, open source is such a staple of developer life that, he continued, "You can no longer win with a closed-source platform."

Already rampant, open source adoption has grown 60% within the 819 enterprises surveyed by Black Duck. Why? Because of "cost savings, easy access, and no vendor lock-in (84%); ability to customize code and fix defects directly (67%); better features and technical capabilities (55%); and the rate of open source evolution and innovation (55%)."

SEE: Open source documentation is bad, but proprietary software is worse (TechRepublic)

Even so, these same respondents worry about a variety of factors:

Given these concerns, it's perhaps not surprising that roughly half of those surveyed are worried about the lack of formal policies for managing open source code. So worried, in fact, that they keep adopting more and more open source software. They can't seem to download it fast enough, but they're sure worried about what might happen!

See the disconnect?

And then there's the "Brother, can you spare a dime?" nonsense. I spent most of my career trying to monetize open source software. It's hard. I tried a variety of approaches, many of them involving the GNU General Public License (GPL), essentially as a scare tactic to induce risk-averse enterprises to pay. The companies I worked for had various degrees of success with this, most of it middling.

Why? Because open source isn't a business model, as Marten Mickos has stressed. It's a fantastic way to develop software and a pretty miserable way to sell it.

SEE: Why AWS Lambda could be the worst thing to happen to open source (TechRepublic)

This isn't new. This is common knowledge, which is why I have little patience for Sourcegraph, MariaDB, and others that have recently launched hybrid licenses in an attempt to capture the benefits of open source without actually being open source. Good luck with that. In the past I ripped into Sourcegraph's Fair Source Licensing, and a year's worth of pondering hasn't changed my opinion. Redmonk analyst Stephen O'Grady has diplomatically offered, "It's not clear...that hybrid licenses...are a worthwhile approach."

I'll go one step further: They're garbage, and decades of open source make that crystal clear.

Envoy developer Matt Klein, contemplating building a business around the software, decided not to. Among other reasons, perhaps the primary reason was that the success of the project largely depends upon it not having a single company standing behind it. He wrote:

Get that? Open source is all about developers, and developers speak code, not corporate. This is why so many vanity foundations, set up as a facade for corporations to control code but appear not to, don't end up succeeding. To succeed, open source needs to be about code, not the whims of a corporate sugar daddy.

In short, open source continues to do amazingly well precisely because open source review boards aren't stunting its growth. It's thriving even as corporations can't figure out efficient ways to monetize it directly. That's the point. It's always been a way for developers to get stuff done with minimal corporate bureaucracy. It's time to celebrate that and not continue trying to shove it into a corporate cubicle.

See original here:
Why the last thing open source needs is more corporate oversight ... - TechRepublic

General Catalyst, Founder Collective fund the creators of open source programming language – Boston Business Journal

Please Sign In and use this article's on page print button to print this article.

poll

Julia Computing makes it easier for organizations to use the open source programming more

Screenshot of Julia Computing website

The creators of the programming language Julia, several of whom have connections to MIT and Harvard, have raised $4.6 million from General Catalyst and Founder Collective for a startup that aims to commercialize the open source code, a type of business that is becoming more common in the Boston area.

Julia Computing builds professional software tools to make it easier for organizations, especially in the finance world, to make use of the Julia language, which is particularly good for in-demand tasks like data analytics and machine learning. Asset manager BlackRock and large British insurer Aviva are both Julia Computing customers, for example.

Julia Computing makes it easier for organizations to use the open source programming more

Screenshot of Julia Computing website

Alan Edelman, a math professor at MIT, helped start Julia Computing in 2015, along with a number of other computer science researchers affiliated with MIT and Harvard. The team is led by CEO Viral Shah and chief operating officer Deepak Vinchhi, who are both based in India, according to their LinkedIn profiles. The co-founders were all early creators Julia.

We selected General Catalyst and Founder Collective as our principal investors because of their successful track records in the technology sector and our shared commitment to open source," Shah said in a statement. "This investment helps us accelerate product development and continue delivering outstanding support to our customers and users."

Donald Fischer, the lead investor from General Catalyst, was an early employee at Red Hat Inc., a pioneer of commercializing open source software. Raleigh, N.C.-based Red Hat (NYSE: RHT) went public in 1999 and brought in more than $2 billion in revenue in fiscal 2016. The company has been growing its presence in Greater Boston in recent years and soon will be opening a 45,000 square foot office at 300 A St. in the city's Fort Point neighborhood.

Other local startups founded to commercialize open source software include Acquia, RapidMiner, Mautic and R Studio, also a General Catalyst investment. Black Duck Software in Burlington helps companies securely manage their use of various open source languages, and Boston-based DataRobot used open source algorithms to automate some data science tasks.

poll

Read the original post:
General Catalyst, Founder Collective fund the creators of open source programming language - Boston Business Journal

Univa Contributes Universal Resource Broker to the Open Source Community – Business Wire (press release)

FRANKFURT, Germany--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ISC High Performance Conference, Booth 1214 Univa, the Data Center Workload Optimization Company, today announced the contribution of its Universal Resource Broker (URB) technology to the open-source community.

The Universal Resource Broker is a software solution that allows distributed application frameworks written for Apache Mesos to run seamlessly on Univa Grid Engine. Making URB available as an open-source project opens the door to continued innovation, enabling community contributors to build adapters to additional workload managers and application frameworks. In addition to open-sourcing the project, Univa is extending URB to support Kubernetes clusters as well.

By using URB, users have the option of deploying any Mesos compatible framework (including Spark, Hadoop, Storm, Jenkins, Marathon and Chronos) along with any other type of workload using Univa Grid Engine as an underlying workload management substrate for high performance and high throughput environments. Users can also choose to run URB on a variety of Kubernetes based cluster solutions in cases where containerized microservices are key. Enterprises requiring more powerful scheduling features and policy-based controls will want to select the combination of Navops Command, URB and Kubernetes with the additional option of Navops Commands Mixed Workload support for non-containerized applications run inside the Kubernetes environment.

According to Fritz Ferstl, CTO at Univa Corporation, This is an important development for our large installed base of Grid Engine customers and for the burgeoning Kubernetes ecosystem. With the Universal Resource Broker, customers can easily deploy a single cluster supporting batch, interactive, containerized and now Mesos API driven workloads without contention. Were continuing to deliver on our promise to help customers achieve better business results on a more cost-efficient, shared infrastructure.

URB provides Kubernetes users with a seamless way to run application frameworks written for Mesos while protecting existing investments. The technology complements Univas Navops Command, an advanced, enterprise-proven policy management solution for Kubernetes that supports mixed workloads. With URB and Navops Command, Univa supports the widest variety of container and non-container based application workloads on a shared Kubernetes environment.

Open source software is critical in the modern application container ecosystem and market, where availability, flexibility and integration can be enhanced by open source software components and frameworks. said Jay Lyman, principal analyst for 451 Research. Univa's URB also supports the variety of software - including big data, continuous integration and container management and orchestration technology - that is critical to success in enterprise IT today.

We are pleased to contribute this key technology to the open source community said Rob Lalonde, General Manager of Univas Navops business unit. This contribution demonstrates our ongoing commitment to open source software and to helping organizations get the most from their infrastructure investments. We are very excited to extend the capabilities of URB to Kubernetes.

The open-source Universal Resource Broker for Grid Engine is expected to be available in July of 2017 and will be released under an Apache open-source license. URB for Kubernetes is planned for August of 2017 availability.

For more information visit http://www.univa.com, contact Univa atsales@univa.comor stop by booth #C-1214 at the ISC High Performance 2017, June 19-21 in Frankfurt, Germany.

About Univa Grid Engine

Univa Grid Engine is the leading workload management system. The solution maximizes the use of shared resources in a datacenter and applies advanced policy management tools to deliver products and results faster, more efficiently, and with lower overall costs. The product can be deployed in any technology environment, including containers: on-premises, hybrid or in the cloud. A variety of add-ons can be utilized to extend workload management capabilities and create a customized solution for any enterprise infrastructure. For more information, please visit http://www.univa.com or follow on Twitter @Grid_Engine

About Navops

Navops is a suite of products that enables enterprises to take full advantage of Kubernetes and provides the ability to quickly and efficiently run containers at scale. Navops utilizes workload placement and advanced policy management across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid infrastructures. With Navops, companies can automate microservices applications and efciently respond to end user demand. For more information, please visit http://www.navops.io or follow on Twitter @Navops

About Univa Corporation

Univa, the Data Center Automation Company, is the leading provider of automation and management software for computational and big data infrastructures. Our products and global enterprise support give our customers the power to manage all of their compute resources, no matter how big or where deployed. Many of the leading brands in the world depend on Univa's unsurpassed expertise, and premier services and support. Univa is headquartered in Hoffman Estates, Illinois, USA, with offices in Markham, ON, Canada, Munich and Regensburg, Germany.

See original here:
Univa Contributes Universal Resource Broker to the Open Source Community - Business Wire (press release)

Julian Assange – Journalist, Computer Programmer, Activist …

Journalist, Computer Programmer, Activist(1971)

Julian Assange came to international attention as the founder of the whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks.

1 of 2

quotes

If journalism is good, it is controversial, by its nature.

It is the role of good journalism to take on powerful abusers, and when powerful abusers are taken on, there's always a bad reaction. So we see that controversy, and we believe that is a good thing to engage in.

Julian Assange

Born on July 3, 1971, in Townsville, Australia, Julian Assange used his genius IQ to hack into the databases of many high profile organizations. In 2006, Assange began work on WikiLeaks, a website intended to collect and share confidential information on an international scale. For his efforts, the internet activist earned the Time magazine "Person of the Year" title in 2010. Seeking to avoid extradition to Sweden over sexual assault allegations, Assange has remained at the Ecuadorian embassy in London since 2012. In 2016, his work again drew international attention when WikiLeaks published thousands of emails from U.S. presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee, an effort believed to have impacted that year's presidential election.

Journalist, computer programmer and activist Julian Assange was born on July 3, 1971, in Townsville, Queensland, Australia. Assange had an unusual childhood, as he spent some of his early years traveling around with his mother, Christine, and his stepfather, Brett Assange. The couple worked together to put on theatrical productions. Brett Assange later described Julian as a "sharp kid who always fought for the underdog."

The relationship between Brett and Christine later soured, but Assange and his mother continued to live a transient lifestyle. With all of the moving around, Assange ended up attending roughly 37 different schools growing up, and was frequently homeschooled.

Assange discovered his passion for computers as a teenager. At the age of 16, he got his first computer as a gift from his mother. Before long, he developed a talent for hacking into computer systems. His 1991 break-in to the master terminal for Nortel, a telecommunications company, got him in trouble. Assange was charged with more than 30 counts of hacking in Australia, but he got off the hook with only a fine for damages.

Assange continued to pursue a career as a computer programmer and software developer. An intelligent mind, he studied mathematics at the University of Melbourne. He dropped out without finishing his degree, later claiming that he left the university for moral reasons; Assange objected to other students working on computer projects for the military.

In 2006, Assange began work on WikiLeaks, a website intended to collect and share confidential information on an international scale. The site officially launched in 2007 and it was run out of Sweden at the time because of the country's strong laws protecting a person's anonymity. Later that year, WikiLeaks released a U.S. military manual that provided detailed information on the Guantanamo detention center. WikiLeaks also shared emails from then-vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin that it received from an anonymous source in September 2008.

In early December 2010, Assange discovered that he had other legal problems to worry about. Since early August, he had been under investigation by the Swedish police for allegations that included two counts of sexual molestation, one count of illegal coercion, and one count of rape. After a European Arrest Warrant was issued by Swedish authorities on December 6, Assange turned himself in to the London police.

Following a series of extradition hearings in early 2011 to appeal the warrant, Assange learned on November 2, 2011, that the High Court dismissed his appeal. Still on conditional bail, Assange made plans to appeal to the U.K. Supreme Court.

According to a New York Times article, Assange came to the Ecuadorean Embassy in London in June 2012, seeking to avoid extradition to Sweden. Nearly two months later, in August 2012, Assange was granted political asylum by the Ecuadorean government, which, according to the Times, "protects Mr. Assange from British arrest, but only on Ecuadorean territory, leaving him vulnerable if he tries to leave the embassy to head to an airport or train station." The article went on to say that the decision "cited the possibility that Mr. Assange could face 'political persecution' or be sent to the United States to face the death penalty," putting further strain on the relationship between Ecuador and Britain, and instigating a rebuttal from the Swedish government.

In August 2015 the lesser sexual assault allegations from 2010 with the exceptionof rape were dropped due to statute of limitation violations by Swedish prosecutors. The statue of limitations on the rape allegations will expire in 2020.

In February 2016, a United Nations panel determined that Assange had been arbitrarily detained, and recommended his release and compensation for deprivation of liberty. However, both the Swedish and British governments rejected those findings as non-binding, and reiterated that Assange would be arrested if he left the Ecuadorian embassy.

On May 19, 2017, Sweden said it would drop its rape investigation of Julian Assange. While today was an important victory and important vindication, the road is far from over, he told reporters from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. The war, the proper war, is just commencing.

Assange still faces a warrant in Britain for failing to appear in court, and the U.S. Justice Department said it was reconsidering whether to charge him for revealing classified information.

Assange and WikiLeaks returned to the headlines during the summer of 2016 as the U.S. presidential race was narrowing to two main candidates, Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican Donald Trump. In early July, WikiLeaks released more than 1,200 emails from Clinton's private server during her tenure as secretary of state. Later in the month, WikiLeaks released an additional round of emails from the Democratic National Committee that indicated an effort to undermine Clinton's primary opponent, Bernie Sanders, leading to the resignation ofDNC chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

In October, WikiLeaks unveiled more than 2,000 emails from Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, which included excerpts from speeches to Wall Street banks. By this point, U.S. government officials had gone public with the belief that Russian agents had hacked into DNC servers and supplied the emails to WikiLeaks, though Assange repeatedly insisted that was not the case.

On the eve of the election, Assange released a statement in which he declared no "personal desire to influence the outcome," noting that he never received documents from the Trump campaign to publish. "Irrespective of the outcome of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election," he wrote, "the real victor is the U.S. public which is better informed as a result of our work." Shortly afterward, Trump was declared the winner of the election.

Rumors of a relationship between Assange and actress Pamela Anderson surfaced after the former Baywatch star was spotted visiting the Ecuadorian embassy in late 2016. "Julian is trying to free the world by educating it," she later told People. "It is a romantic struggle I love him for this."

In April 2017, Showtime announced that it would air theAssange documentary Risk, which hadpremiered at the 2016 Cannes Film Festival but updated with events related to the U.S. presidential election.

We strive for accuracy and fairness. If you see something that doesn't look right, contact us!

Julian Assange Biography.com

Biography.com Editors

The Biography.com website

June 19, 2017

A&E Television Networks

May 19, 2017

n/a

Go here to see the original:
Julian Assange - Journalist, Computer Programmer, Activist ...

Pamela Anderson pens love letter to Julian Assange – Fox News

Pamela Anderson has penned an online love letter to Julian Assange calling on world leaders to intervene to set the WikiLeaks founder free.

The former Baywatch star said there was no longer any need to keep him "trapped in a small room" now that Sweden has dropped its case against him.

Assange has been holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London for almost five years after seeking asylum as he feared he would be extradited to Sweden to answer allegations of sexual assault which he denied.

He was also concerned that if he was taken to the Scandinavian country then he could be sent to the U.S. to face trial over WikiLeaks' release of classified American government documents.

In the letter, Anderson said Theresa May was the "worst prime minister in living memory" but praised Labor leader Jeremy Corbyn.

The 49-year-old actress continued: "But Theresa May -- who kept him imprisoned in the embassy for five years -- refuses to allow him to leave.

"Theresa May, who is on her last legs. Theresa May of the pyhrric victory (sic).

"Theresa May, who won't shake the hand of the victims of the Grenfell fire. Who doesn't care about poor people. Who doesn't care about justice or peace. Who doesn't care about Julian.

"The worst prime minister in living memory."

Anderson also invited French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte to the opening of her new restaurant in France in July, and asked him to grant Assange asylum.

She wrote that she and Corbyn have a mutual compassion for animals, while saying Assange, 45, should be given compensation.

'I love you, Pamela'

To Corbyn, she said: "I have watched the recent UK election with great interest. I have cheered the turn in your party's fortunes! You are clearly a decent and fair man."

Anderson describes the U.S. government as the "ultimate bully, a superpower, with 1,200 military bases all around the world."

In the letter posted on pamelaandersonfoundation.org, the ex-Playboy model gushed over how his "bravery and courage" make Assange sexy.

She signed it: "I love you, Pamela."

This story originally appeared on Sky News.

Here is the original post:
Pamela Anderson pens love letter to Julian Assange - Fox News

What we know about Julian Assange’s cat – the Irish News


the Irish News
What we know about Julian Assange's cat
the Irish News
Embassy Cat, a descendent from the original European wildcat, was a gift from Assange's young children to keep their father company. She was just a tiny 10-week-old kitten when she was given to him in May 2016, which would make her around a year and ...

See the original post here:
What we know about Julian Assange's cat - the Irish News

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Cryptocurrency Mining at 65W Achieves 22 MH/s Rate Impressive and Silent Mining … – Wccftech

NVIDIAs partners are creating new Pascal graphics cards for cryptocurrency mining and while they do so, Legitreviews has posted a new guide on how to achieve some impressive mining rates on a single GeForce GTX 1060.

In a series of guides posted by Legitreviews, they have detailed some impressive techniques and tricks to get better hash rates on NVIDIA Pascal GPUs. The card tested by the site was a GeForce GTX 1060 FTW+ 6 GB which costs a little bit more compared to the SSC model. The card ships with a custom dual fan cooler and starts at a price of $249.99 US. These prices will vary since GeForce GTX cards are also affected by price inflation like the Radeon counterparts since the recent mining wave hit the market.

Running on stock frequencies, the card delivers a hash rate of 18.88 with a power consumption of 100W at 68C. With the memory overclocked to 10000 MHz, the card achieved 23.61 MH/s and was running at 70C while consuming 112.9W. The results you see below are obtained with the power target set at reference 100%. While the 10 GHz overclock wasnt stable as it started artifacting, the clocks on memory were toned down to 9.5 GHz for a hash rate of 22.77 MH/s at 109.9W.

By lowering the power target we managed to go from ~110 Watts of power at 22.8 MH/s to just ~65 Watts of power at 22.1 MH/s. As you lower the power target the hashrate does take a slight performance hit, but loosing roughly 0.5 MH/s for cutting the power use by 45 Watts is pretty slick. We also managed to drop our temperature from 70C down to 58C and on this 0dB graphics card model that means the fans stop spinning!

So, we are miningEthereumgetting 22 MH/s on a card using 65 Watts of power with no fan noise. That is pretty crazy! Fanless silent Ethrereum mining! If you go down to a power target of 40% the hashrate takes a major performance hit and it isnt worth going below 45%. via Legitreviews

Tuning the card can lead to some very astonishing results. With the memory still overclocked at 9.5 GHz and power target limited down to different ratios, we can see better efficiency results. Mining is all about making the best buck while consuming less power and the GTX 1060 shined here. With the power limit set to 45%, the card delivered 22.11 MH/s rate at 58C and consumed only 65W that makes a hugedifference. Its also worth noting that the fan speed was set to 0% which means that the card performed under 60C without the fan even operating which is impressive.

Compared to the 100% power limit, the 45% limit allows for a 45W power consumption difference to achieve a very similar hash rate. A single card can make a profit of $138 per month. Having six of these cards inside a custom machine like the one we detailed a while ago would yield$10,080 in a year if the current Ethereum prices are taken into account.

How much would it cost to build a Ethereum mining PC that can hold seven of these cards for around 155-160 MH/s of performance? Here is a quick example of the hardware youd need:

MSI Z170A Gaming M5 Motherboard $129.39 shipped

Intel Celeron G3930 Processor $41.00 shipped

PCIe 16x to 1x Adapters $8.99 eachand up to 7 needed

Cable Ties $5.99 shipped(Got to hold those video cards up to something)

EVGA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB SSC Graphics Card $266.11 shippedup to 7 needed

Crucial 4GB Single DDR4 2133MHz Memory Module $29.98 shipped

Seasonic Prime 1000W 80PLUS Platinum Power Supply $239.24 shipped(An 850W 80PLUS Platinum PSU is $128.49)

SATA to 8-pin PCIe power adapters $6 shipped(Most Power Supplies dont have 7 8-pin PCIe power connectors)

DREVO X1 Series 60GB SSD $39.99 shipped

AmazonBasics Wired Keyboard & Mouse $14.99 shipped

Case Wed suggest making your own with milk crates or something creative

OS Linux or Windows Grab an ISO and use what you prefer!

Power Meter To Make Power Adjustments $18.53 shipped

You are looking at around $2,450 to setup a system like this that should be capable of mining just shy of 3 Ether per month at the current difficulty levels. That means youd be making about $966 per month if all goes well. That means youd get your investment back in the hardware in right about 2.5 months. Not bad for 155-160 MH/s. Via Legitreviews

Expect to see mining specific graphics cards based on NVIDIAs Pascal GPUs that include P106-100 and P104-100 in the coming weeks.

Share Submit

Continue reading here:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Cryptocurrency Mining at 65W Achieves 22 MH/s Rate Impressive and Silent Mining ... - Wccftech

AvaTrade Launches New Tradable Cryptocurrency Pairs – Finance Magnates

AvaTrade, a forex and CFDs brokerage, has announced the addition of cryptocurrency pairs to its asset list on its website, and noted its intention to add more in the future. As of now, the online trading firm offers Ethereum Classic versus the American dollar (ETH/USD), and the Bitcoin versus the euro (BTC/EUR).

The London Summit 2017 is coming, get involved!

The allure of cryptocurrencies appears to be their high volatility, as well as the ability of their value to soar to new highs even when other markets are not volatile. About two weeks ago, Finance Magnates covered the Bitcoin versus the dollar exchange rate reaching $2877. Being able to trade cryptocurrencies within currency pairs rather than just as individual assets may be a sign of more advanced stages to come.

Dire Ferguson, the CEO of AvaTrade, commented: These are exciting times; the trading world is changing in front of our eyes, and we are glad to play a major role in it. Cryptocurrencies are the future, and AvaTrade stands in the frontline of brokers when it comes to trading them. We work hard to insure we offer our clients the best trading conditions and possibilities.

AvaTrade is a brokerage offering forex and contracts for difference (CFDs) trading. The company was established back in 2006, and is authorized and licensed to offer financial advice and online trading services to clients by several regulatory authorities such as the Central Bank of Ireland (Reference No.: C53877).

Last week, Finance Magnates reported HYCMs having added cryptocurrency pair Bitcoin versus the American dollar to its asset list. The reason behind adding these new currency pairs is the increase in demand for them from traders.

This morning, Finance Magnates covered XTBs having added several cryptocurrency pairs of its own.

Original post:
AvaTrade Launches New Tradable Cryptocurrency Pairs - Finance Magnates