Senators Try to Force Trump Admin to Declare WikiLeaks a ‘Hostile … – Daily Beast

If the Senate intelligence committee gets its way, Americas spy agencies will have to release a flood of information about Russian threats to the U.S.the kind of threats that Donald Trump may not want made public.

The committee also wants Congress to declare WikiLeaks a non-state hostile intelligence service, which would open Julian Assange and the pro-transparency organization which most of the U.S. government considers a handmaiden of Russian intelligence to new levels of surveillance.

On Friday, the committee quietly published its annual intelligence authorization, a bill that blesses the next years worth of intelligence operations. The bill passed the committee late last month on a 14-1 vote, with Democrat Ron Wyden of Oregon as the lone dissenter, owing to what he calls the legal, constitutional and policy implications that the WikiLeaks provision may entail.

Among the bills major provisions are requirements for the intelligence community to release major public reports into Russian threats to U.S. elections, Russian interference in the 2016 campaign, Moscows influence operations, Russian money laundering in the U.S., and more. In short, the Senate committee intends to do a lot more about Russia than investigate its involvement in the 2016 presidential race namely, box the Trump administration into a more assertive response to Russian aggression.

All the proposed Russia-related disclosures show that the committee, on a bipartisan basis, will pry out of the intelligence community any assessment of the Russian threat, said Mieke Eoyang, a former House intelligence committee senior staffer, and will prevent the White House from blocking the intelligence community from telling the committee and the American public what the true Russia threat is.

Dan Coats, the director of national intelligence, would have to develop and disclose a strategy to prevent Russian cyber threats to United States elections, including federal, state and local election systems, voter registration databases, voting tabulation equipment, and equipment and processes for the secure transmission of election results. Such a strategy, the committee seeks to mandate, should include security measures like auditable paper trails for voting machines, securing wireless and Internet connections, and other technical safeguards.

Other requirements of the bill include a ban on a cybersecurity unit or other cyber agreement that is jointly established or otherwise implemented by the Government of the United States and the Government of Russia unless Coats essentially vouches for it. Trump floated the idea in July after his first meeting with Vladimir Putin and then walked it back when a political backlash ensued. Wyden proposed the measure banning the cyber-collaboration.

Another possible Trump act the bill would complicate is the return of two diplomatic compounds, in New York and Maryland, used by Russian intelligence operatives and seized by the U.S. in the waning days of the Obama administration. Coats would have six months to issue a report on the intelligence risks of returning the covered compounds to Russian control, a step the White House is considering. Relatedly, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson would have to keep much closer track of Russian diplomatic and consular officials travel within the U.S., telling Coats and new FBI director Christopher Wray within 1 hour what he knows about such travel.

Coats would also have to detail for the House and Senate committees the extent of illicit Russian cash flow, including the entry points of money laundering by Russian and associated entities into the United States and any vulnerabilities in the U.S. financial and legal systems that Russian money laundering has exploited. Unlike the other Russia-centric provisions of the bill, the Senate committee isnt explicitly requiring a public version of the money laundering report.

The House intelligence committees complementary bill would authorize similar but less extensive public reporting on Russian influence campaigns aimed at U.S. and other nations elections. Chairman Devin Nunes, a California Republican, declined comment. Richard Burr, the North Carolina Republican who chairs the Senate intelligence committee, did not respond to a request for comment.

A spokesman for the office of the director of national intelligence, Timothy Barrett, did not say whether Coats supports or opposes the Senate bill. As with previous intelligence authorization bills, the ODNI will provide Congress with a views letter addressing specific provisions in the legislation, Barrett said. Coats in May told the Senate panel that Russia was likely to be more unpredictable in its approach to the United States.

The White House did not respond to an inquiry about whether it backs the bill.

Get The Beast In Your Inbox!

Start and finish your day with the top stories from The Daily Beast.

A speedy, smart summary of all the news you need to know (and nothing you don't).

Subscribe

Thank You!

You are now subscribed to the Daily Digest and Cheat Sheet. We will not share your email with anyone for any reason.

The bill also contains a more controversial move.

The bill would establish a sense of Congress that WikiLeaks and its leadership resemble a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors and should be treated as such a service by the United States. The language echoes almost exactly CIA director Mike Pompeos scathing April speech calling WikiLeaks a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors like Russia, a departure from the I love WikiLeaks rhetoric from then-candidate Trump.

The move, Eoyang assessed, would open WikiLeaks up to even more extensive surveillance.

It would allow the intelligence community to collect against them the same way they collect against al-Qaeda, Eoyang said. If you think youre helping WikiLeaks to aid a transparency organization, the US government fundamentally disagrees with you and you could find yourself on other end of NSA scrutiny.

Wyden has criticized WikiLeaks before, including a May statement that Trump actively encouraged Russians and WikiLeaks to attack our democracy. WikiLeaks denies the accusation. But Wyden voted against the bill out of concern for the implications of the WikiLeaks provision.

My concern is that the use of the novel phrase non-state hostile intelligence service may have legal, constitutional, and policy implications, particularly should it be applied to journalists inquiring about secrets, Wyden said in a quote to the Daily Beast he later released in a statement.

The language in the bill suggesting that the U.S. government has some unstated course of action against non-state hostile intelligence services is equally troubling. The damage done by WikiLeaks to the United States is clear. But with any new challenge to our country, Congress ought not react in a manner that could have negative consequences, unforeseen or not, for our constitutional principles. The introduction of vague, undefined new categories of enemies constitutes such an ill-considered reaction.

WikiLeaks did not respond to a request for comment before publication, but hours afterward provided links to its previous defenses against the charge that it is an adjunct of Russian intelligence. (link 1 and link 2).

This story was updated to add links provided by WikiLeaks after publication.

Excerpt from:
Senators Try to Force Trump Admin to Declare WikiLeaks a 'Hostile ... - Daily Beast

WikiLeaks a ‘hostile intelligence service’, SS7 spying, Russian money laundering all now on US Congress todo list – The Register

Protest ... Senator Ron Wyden

Every year, US Congress must pass a new Intelligence Authorization Act to continue funding Uncle Sam's spies for the next 12 months. This year, the act passed, as expected, the committee stage smoothly with only one minor bump in the road: Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR).

Wyden objected to a clause in the bill [PDF] that described WikiLeaks as a "non-state hostile intelligence service," which was inserted after the website pissed off enough people in government. The wording would give the intelligence services more power to investigate the site and its founder Julian "I'm not in a cupboard" Assange.

This isn't to say Wyden is defending Assange: the senator fears journalists will also be labeled hostile intelligence services for embarrassing the administration.

"My concern is that the use of the novel phrase 'non-state hostile intelligence service' may have legal, constitutional, and policy implications, particularly should it be applied to journalists inquiring about secrets," said Senator Wyden.

"The language in the bill suggesting that the US government has some unstated course of action against 'non-state hostile intelligence services' is equally troubling. The damage done by WikiLeaks to the United States is clear. But with any new challenge to our country, Congress ought not react in a manner that could have negative consequences, unforeseen or not, for our constitutional principles."

In the end, the act passed the Senate intelligence committee in a vote of 14-1. You can easily guess which side Wyden took.

The senator did, however, manage to get three amendments into the bill, one of which could stymie President Trump's suggestion that the US and Russia should join forces on a cybercrime unit to investigate hacking. If such a scheme is mooted, Congress will have to be informed as to what intelligence is shared and how. The President backtracked on that idea, for what it's worth.

Wyden's second amendment is about mounting fears over hacking mobile phones via SS7 protocol flaws that can turn any mobe into a spy in your pocket. The amendment requires the intelligence agencies to report any evidence that foreign powers are using the SS7 flaw for surveillance purposes.

Finally, Wyden's third amendment will require US intelligence officials to work with the Treasury Department's Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence on a report into Russian money laundering in the US. Such data could be very useful in the ongoing probe into possible Putin interference in the last US elections.

The tweaked proposed funding legislation will now be submitted to the House of Representatives and the Senate for their approval and modifications. Whether the amendments survive all the way is up to Congress, and whether Trump signs it is up to him.

Sponsored: The Joy and Pain of Buying IT - Have Your Say

Continued here:
WikiLeaks a 'hostile intelligence service', SS7 spying, Russian money laundering all now on US Congress todo list - The Register

Chelsea Manning Beauty Exclusive: ‘This Is An Expression Of My Humanity’ – HuffPost

Editors note: Chelsea Manning has been making headlines since 2010 first for leaking diplomatic cables that led to Mannings conviction under the Espionage Act, and then, beginning the day after she was sentenced to 35 years in 2013, for coming out as transgender. After she spent seven years in prison and attempted suicide twice,thenPresident Barack Obama commuted her sentence. Manning was released from prison in May and immediately began documenting her new life of freedom on Instagram.Here, she shares exclusively with Yahoo Beauty what its like to finally be open in the world with her identity, and how her expression of that, through her approach to beauty and style, is ever evolving.

When President Trumpannounced the transgender military ban, I happened to be 10 blocks from the White House. There was a spontaneous protest going on, and before going I spent a split second considering what I was wearing all-black clothing, Doc Martens, womens pants from5.11 Tactical and if I should change.

But I realized I dont have to dress a certain way, I can just be me.

For the Instagram picture, I put on my dark lipstick, and I choose my lipstick colors carefully. Im not just saying, I like this edgy color. This is an expression of my humanity. And beauty, to me, is self-expression.

Now that Im out and free, I love experimenting with makeup. I use it to project different moods and emphasize what Im trying to say in a particular moment. Most days I put on a liquid foundation, some powder for highlights, eyeliner, a mascara base, and mascara, with either a lipstick or gloss for the day. Im wearing a lot of bold lipsticks, because Im trying to make bold statements: Im here and Im free and I can do whatever I want.

The first time the world saw me as I see me is that picture that went viral of me in the blond wig, which I sent to my superior. I took that picture for myself when I was on leave in January of 2010. I took it as a little memento of who I was at that moment. I never intended it to be shared with the world.

When I look at that picture now, I see me but I see me in a phase of trying to figure myself out. Im much closer to who I am today than I was in that photo. But it was a process to get here.

By the time I enrolled in the military at 20, I had spent years in denial about who I really was. I was openly gay and would go through periods of cross-dressing, and had even thought about transitioning, but I was in such complete denial. To overcompensate and because I was constantly being reminded of how inadequate I was as a male I enrolled in the military. My thought was, I must enlist and man up.

That thought really wears on you.

The one place I never felt at all comfortable in the military was in private circles of conversation. Theres a tendency, especially among young men, to objectify and denigrate women behind closed doors. Theyd say ridiculous, raunchy things about women call them sluts and whores, basically just treat them like objects. It was a line I just couldnt cross. Id try to avoid those kinds of macho conversations, because thats inevitably what would come up. Id get very, very distant.

That said, I loved my job and I took my military career very seriously. Theres this idea out there that, had I not been trans, the leaks and stuff would never have happened. But to my mind those are two completely separate things. Had I been out, I think I still would have been attracted to the military, but I would have been more comfortable and gotten along with people better. Being closeted often put me in situations where I couldnt concentrate or even think straight.

I loved my job, and had I been out, I think I would have been even better at it.

Now I try to be bold. I try to be myself. I really believe in this notion that we cant have anybody speak for us. But whats happened over the last 20 years is that the queer and trans community has depended on people who are not queer or trans to speak for us in places of power, whether thats a state legislature or a courtroom. We need to show up and speak for ourselves now more than ever.

People ask if Ill eventually run for office and be that voice, but the truth is Im not ready to make bigger decisions just yet. Right now Im just settling into my new apartment, Im watching theHandmaids Tale. Im not discounting any of the bigger things, but I need to buy a couch and a coffee table first.

Im also fine-tuning my style, perfecting my makeup skills. I suck at eyeshadow, and thats why I havent worn it, but Im watching YouTube videos and practicing. Im borrowing a lot of elements of punk and pop culture and incorporating a lot of the cyberpunk look. People tell me Im like the protagonist of a cyberpunk movie or something, so I may as well dress for it.

But heres the thing: Theres no public Chelsea and private Chelsea, theres just Chelsea. Im still the same person that Ive always been on the inside. Everything Ive gone through has just strengthened my sense of self and my sense of who I am. I cant pretend to be anyone else. I dont have a public persona. The person you see is the person I am.

Follow this link:
Chelsea Manning Beauty Exclusive: 'This Is An Expression Of My Humanity' - HuffPost

CAT FIGHT? Chelsea Manning snaps at Ben Shapiro, Jenna Jameson swoops in with claws OUT – Twitchy

Look, its Chelsea Manning decked out in makeup and combat boots, threatening to step on her phone.

Welcome to peak 2017 and you thought we couldnt top 2016. Shame on you.

Guess shes implying shes going to stomp on peoples faces? No offense, Chelsea, but its sorta hard to be scared of you with all of those emoji in your tweet, just sayin.

But its all about peace man!

Notice Chelsea is answering Ben at 2:48 in the morning something she was just pretending was a big deal for Ben. Guess who else was up?

BOOM. Dont mess with Ben on Jennas watch.

Heh. Hey, hes only human.

Maybe not?

Editors note: You know when youre writing a piece about a trans-woman getting the slapdown from a former porn star for attacking a Jew youve reached peak 2017.

Related:

BRUTAL: Jeet Heer just gets EMBARRASSED in back-and-forth with Conservatives about AntiFa

OOF: Bill de Blasio will hate Ben Shapiros suggestion for a symbol of hate NYC SHOULD remove

View original post here:
CAT FIGHT? Chelsea Manning snaps at Ben Shapiro, Jenna Jameson swoops in with claws OUT - Twitchy

Why Does Anyone Listen to James Clapper Anymore? – PJ Media

James Clapper is evidently concerned Donald Trump is dangerous. The former director of national intelligence questions the president's "fitness for office" and believes he behaves in such an erratic manner that he might bomb North Korea and bring on Armageddon. Further, via Bridget Johnson:

Wow!... Well, Clapper should know something about "ethical voids." He also should have a good idea how long we will "endure" anything, nightmare or otherwise, because he knew what nearly every one of us said on the phone or wrote in our emails and texts at any time -- or could have found out, if he had wanted to, almost instantly.

This is clear although Clapper tried to hide the truth by telling one of the most egregious lies I have ever heard from the lips of an American official, a lie meant to cover up an action by our government so evil it makes the lies of Obama, Hillary, or Trump almost inconsequential. Virtually every U.S. citizen is now under some level of surveillance by our intelligence agencies -- our privacy is dead -- but James Clapper tried to deceive us all about it and make us think it isn't so.

But don't believe me. Believe Wikipedia, which seems to have it right in this instance:

When Edward Snowden was asked during his January 26, 2014, TV interview in Moscow what the decisive moment was or why he blew the whistle, he replied: Sort of the breaking point was seeing the director of national intelligence, James Clapper, directly lie under oath to Congress. ... Seeing that really meant for me there was no going back.[32]

Pretty stunning in the era of "unmaskings," no? How do you spell "creeping totalitarianism"? I'm no fan of Edward Snowden, but it's easy to see how a young man with his knowledge would react the way he did to the egregious prevarication by the director of national intelligence.

See the original post here:
Why Does Anyone Listen to James Clapper Anymore? - PJ Media

New York Film Festival Sets Documentary Lineup – Deadline

The New York Film Festival has unveiled the roster of its Spotlight on Documentary section for this years fest, which runs September 28-October 15. Filmmakers in the lineup include Alex Gibney, Abel Ferrara and Nancy Buirski, with subjects ranging from Joan Didion and Jane Goodall to Arthur Miller and U.S. immigration to the global refugee crisis.

Two of the docus premiering the lineup the Griffin Dunne-directed Joan Didion: The Center Will Not Hold and the Gay Talese-centered Voyeur have been set up at Netflix and will bow later this year.

The 55th annual festival run by the Film Society of Lincoln Center opens this year with Richard Linklaters Last Flag Flying and closes with Woody Allens Wonder Wheel. Todd Haynes Wonderstruck has a gala slot.

Heres the full Spotlight on Documentary lineup:

Arthur Miller: Writer Dir. Rebecca Miller, USA, 2017, 98m Rebecca Millers film is a portrait of her father, his times and insights, built around impromptu interviews shot over many years in the family home. This celebration of the great American playwright is quite different from what the public has ever seen. It is a close consideration of a singular life shadowed by the tragedies of the Red Scare and the death of Marilyn Monroe; a bracing look at success and failure in the public eye; an honest accounting of human frailty; a tribute to one artist by another. Arthur Miller: Writer invites you to see how one of Americas sharpest social commentators formed his ideologies, how his life reflected his work, and, even in some small part, shaped the culture of our country in the twentieth century. An HBO Documentary Films release.

BOOM FOR REAL: The Late Teenage Years of Jean-Michel Basquiat Dir. Sara Driver, USA, 2017, 79m U.S. Premiere Sara Drivers documentary is both a celebration of and elegy for the downtown New York art/music/film/performance world of the late 1970s and early 80s, through which Jean-Michel Basquiat shot like a rocket. Weaving Basquiats life and artistic progress in and out of her rich, living tapestry of this endlessly cross-fertilizing scene, Driver has created an urgent recollection of freedom and the aesthetic of poverty. Graffiti meets gestural painting, hip hop infects rock and roll and visa versa, heroin comes and never quite goes, night swallows day, and everybody looms as large as they feel like looming on the crumbling streets of the Lower East Side.

Cielo Dir. Alison McAlpine, Canada/Chile, 2017, 74m World Premiere The first feature from Alison McAlpine, director of the beautiful 2008 nonfiction ghost story short Second Sight, is a dialogue with the heavensin this case, the heavens above the Andes and the Atacama Desert in northern Chile, where the sky is more urgent than the land. McAlpine keeps the vast galaxies above and beyond in a delicate balance with the earthbound world of people, gently alighting on the desert- and mountain-dwelling astronomers, fishermen, miners, and cowboys who live their lives with reverence and awe for the skies. Cielo itself is an act of reverence and awe, and its sense of wonder ranges from the intimate and human to the vast and inhuman.

Did You Wonder Who Fired the Gun? Dir. Travis Wilkerson, USA, 2017, 90m How is it that some people escape the racism and misogyny in which they are raised, and some cling to it as their reason to exist? For 20 years, Travis Wilkerson has been making films that interrogate the malevolent effects of capitalism on the American Dream. Here he turns his sights on his own family and the small town of Dothan, Alabama, where his white supremacist great-great grandfather S.E. Branch once shot and killed Bill Spann, an African-American man. Branch was arrested but never charged with the crime. The life of his victim has been all but obliterated from memory and public record. This isnt a white savior story. This is a white nightmare story, says the filmmaker, who refuses to let himself or anyone else off the hook.

El mar la mar Dir. Joshua Bonnetta & J.P. Sniadecki, USA, 2017, 94m The first collaboration between film and sound artist Bonnetta and filmmaker/anthropologist Sniadecki (The Iron Ministry, NYFF52) is a lyrical and highly topical film in which the Sonoran Desert, among the deadliest routes taken by those crossing from Mexico to the United States, is depicted a place of dramatic beauty and merciless danger. Haunting 16mm images of the unforgiving landscape and the human traces within it are supplemented with an intricate soundtrack of interwoven sounds and oral testimonies. Urgent yet never didactic, El mar la mar allows this symbolically fraught terrain to take shape in vivid sensory detail, and in so doing, suggests new possibilities for the political documentary. A Cinema Guild release.

Filmworker Dir. Tony Zierra, USA, 2017, 94m Leon Vitali was a name in English television and movies when Stanley Kubrick cast him as Lord Bullingdon in Barry Lyndon, but after his acclaimed performance the young actor surrendered his career in the spotlight to become Kubricks loyal right-hand man. For the next two decades, Vitali was Kubricks factotum, never not on call, for whom no task was too small. Along the way, Vitalis personal life suffered, he drifted from his children, and his health deteriorated as he gave everything to his work. Filmworker is of obvious interest to anyone who cares about Kubrick, but it is also a fascinating portrait of awe-inspired devotion burning all the way down to the wick.

Hall of Mirrors Dir. Ena Talakic and Ines Talakic, USA, 2017, 87m World Premiere In this lively documentary portrait, the great nonpartisan investigative reporter Edward Jay Epstein, still going strong at 81, takes us through his most notable articles and books, including close looks at the findings of the Warren Commission, the structure of the diamond industry, the strange career of Armand Hammer, and the inner workings of big-time journalism itself. These are interwoven with an in-progress investigation into the circumstances around Edward Snowdens 2013 leak of classified documents, resulting in Epsteins recently published, controversial book How America Lost Its Secrets: Edward Snowden, the Man and the Theft. One of the last of his generation of journalists, the energetic, articulate, and boyish Epstein is a truly fascinating character.

Jane Dir. Brett Morgen, USA, 2017, 90m U.S. Premiere In 1960, Dr. Louis Leakey arranged for a young English woman with a deep love of animals to go to Gombe Stream National Park near Lake Tangyanika. The Dutch photographer and filmmaker Hugo van Lawick was sent to document Jane Goodalls first establishment of contact with the chimpanzee population, resulting in the enormously popular Miss Goodall and the Wild Chimpanzees, the second film ever produced by National Geographic. One hundred hours of Lawicks original footage was rediscovered in 2014. From that material, Brett Morgen (Kurt Cobain: Montage of Heck) has created a vibrant film experience, giving new life to the experiences of this remarkable woman and the wild in which she found a home. A National Geographic Documentary Films release.

Joan Didion: The Center Will Not Hold Dir. Griffin Dunne, USA, 2017, 92m World Premiere Griffin Dunnes years-in-the-making documentary portrait of his aunt Joan Didion moves with the spirit of her uncannily lucid writing: the film simultaneously expands and zeroes in, covering a vast stretch of turbulent cultural history with elegance and candor, and grounded in the illuminating presence and words of Didion herself. This is most certainly a film about lossthe loss of a solid American center, the personal losses of a husband and a childbut Didion describes everything she sees and experiences so attentively, so fully, and so bravely that she transforms the very worst of life into occasions for understanding. A Netflix release.

No Stone Unturned Dir. Alex Gibney, Northern Ireland/USA, 2017, 111m World Premiere Investigative documentary filmmaker Alex Gibneybest known for 2008s Oscar-winning Taxi to the Dark Side, Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room, and at least a dozen othersturns his sights on the 1994 Loughinisland massacre, a cold case that remains an open wound in the Irish peace process. The families of the victimswho were murdered while watching the World Cup in their local pubwere promised justice, but 20 years later they still didnt know who killed their loved ones. Gibney uncovers a web of secrecy, lies, and corruption that so often results when the powerful insist they are acting for the greater good.

Piazza Vittorio Dir. Abel Ferrara, Italy/USA 2017, 69m North American Premiere Abel Ferraras new documentary is a vivid mosaic/portrait of Romes biggest public square, Piazza Vittorio, built in the 19th century around the ruins of the 3rd century Trofei di Mario. The Piazza is now truly a crossroad of the modern world: it offers a perfect microcosm of the changes in the west brought by immigration and forced displacement. Ferrara, now a resident of Rome himself, talks with African musicians and restaurant workers, Chinese barkeeps and relocated eastern Europeans, homeless men and women, artists, members of the right wing movement CasaPound Italia, filmmaker Matteo Garrone, actor Willem Dafoe, and others, all with varying opinions about the vast changes theyre seeing in their neighborhood and world.

The Rape of Recy Taylor Dir. Nancy Buirski, USA, 2017, 90m North American Premiere On the night of September 3, 1944, a young African-American mother from Abbeville, Alabama, named Recy Taylor was walking home from church with two friends when she was abducted by seven white men, driven away and dragged into the woods, raped by six of the men, and left to make her way home. Against formidable odds and endless threats to her life andthe lives of her family members, Taylor bravely spoke up and pressed charges. Nancy Buirskis passionate documentary shines a light on a case that became a turning point in the early Civil Rights Movement, and on the many formidable womenincluding Rosa Parkswho brought the movement to life.

Sea Sorrow Dir. Vanessa Redgrave, UK, 2017, 72m Vanessa Redgraves debut as a documentary filmmaker is a plea for a compassionate western response to the refugee crisis and a condemnation of the vitriolic inhumanity of current right wing and conservative politicians. Redgrave juxtaposes our horrifying present of inadequate refugee quotas and humanitarian disasters (like last years clearing of the Calais migrant camp) with the refugee crises of WWII and its aftermath, recalled with archival footage, contemporary news reports and personal testimonyincluding an interview with the eloquent Labor politician Lord Dubs, who was one of the children rescued by the Kindertransport. Sea Sorrow reaches further back in time to Shakespeare, not only for its title but also to further remind us that we are once more repeating the history that we have yet to learn.

A Skin So Soft Denis Ct, Canada/Switzerland/France, 2017, 94m U.S. Premiere Studiously observing the world of male bodybuilding, Denis Cts A Skin So Soft (Ta peau si lisse) crafts a multifaceted portrait of six latter-day Adonises through the lens of their everyday lives: extreme diets, training regimens, family relationships, and friendships within the community. Capturing the physical brawn and emotional complexity of its subjects with wit and tenderness, this companion piece to Cotes singular animal study Bestiaire (2012) is a self-reflexive rumination on the long tradition of filming the human body that also advances a fascinating perspective on contemporary masculinity.

Speak Up Dir. Stphane de Freitas, co-directed by Ladj Ly, France, 2017, 99m North American Premiere Each year at the University of Saint-Denis in the suburbs of Paris, the Eloquentia competition takes place to determine the best orator in the class. Speak Up ( voix haute La Force de la Parole) follows the students, who come from a variety of family backgrounds and academic disciplines, as they prepare for the competition while coached by public-speaking professionals like lawyers and slam poets. Through the subtle and intriguing mechanics of rhetoric, these young people both reveal and discover themselves, and it is impossible not to be moved by the personal stories that surface in their verbal jousts, from the death of a Syrian nightingale to a fathers Chuck Norrisinspired approach to his battle with cancer. Without sentimentality, Speak Up proves how the art of speech is key to universal understanding, social ascension, and personal revelation.

The Venerable W. Dir. Barbet Schroeder, France/Switzerland, 2017, 100m The Islamophobic Burmese monk known as The Venerable Wirathu has led hundreds of thousands of his Buddhist followers in a hate-fueled, violent campaign of ethnic cleansing, in which the countrys tiny minority of Muslims were driven from their homes and businesses and penned in refugee camps on the Myanmar border. Barbet Schroders portrait of this man again proves, along with his General Idi Amin Dada (1974) and Terrors Advocate (2007), that the director is a brilliant interviewer, allowing power-hungry fascists to damn themselves with their own testimony. His confrontation with Wirathua figure whose existence contradicts the popular belief that Buddhism is the most peaceful and tolerant major religionis revelatory and horrifying. A release from Les Films du Losange.

Preceded by: What Are You Up to, Barbet Schroeder? (2017, 13m), in which the director traces the path that led him to Myanmar, a center of Theravada Buddhism, where racial hatred was mutating into genocide.

Voyeur Myles Kane and Josh Koury, USA, 2017, 96m World Premiere Gerald Foos bought a motel in Colorado in the 1960s, furnished the room with louvered vents that allowed him to spy on his guests, and kept a journal of their sexual encountersamong other things. As writer Gay Talese, who had known Foos for more than three decades, came close to the publication of his book The Voyeurs Motel (preceded by an excerpt in The New Yorker), factual discrepancies in Fooss account emerged, and documentarians Kane and Koury were on hand to record some wild encounters between the veteran New York journalist and his enigmatic subject. A Netflix release.

Three Music Films by Mathieu Amalric Cest presque au bout du monde (France, 2015, 16m) Zorn (2010-2017) (France, 2017, 54m) Music Is Music (France, 2017, 21m) These three movies from Mathieu Amalric are musicals, from the inside out: they move with the mental and physical energies of John Zorn, the wildly prolific and protean composer/performer/bandleader/record label founder/club owner and all-around grand spirit of New York downtown music; and via the great Canadian-born soprano/conductor/champion of modern classical music Barbara Hannigan. Amalrics Zorn film began as a European TV commission that was quickly abandoned in favor of something more intimate: an ongoing dialogue between two friends that will always be a work-in-progress. The two shorter pieces that bracket the Zorn feature Hannigan nurturing music into being with breath, sound, and spirit. Taken together, the three films make for one thrilling, intimate musical-gestural-cinematic ride.

Read the original:
New York Film Festival Sets Documentary Lineup - Deadline

Librem 13 laptop review: physical security for the paranoid – The Verge

Every time I've used a Linux computer at least, a Linux computer that's not hidden behind the sheen of Chrome or Android it's been the exact same story: nothing ever works right the first time. So I was both excited and a little scared when I was offered a Librem 13 laptop from Purism. The $1,399 ($1,537 as tested) Librem 13 runs PureOS out of the box, Purism's security-focused version of Linux. That means all the initial hurdles of getting Linux running on a system were solved for me. I wouldn't have to worry about whether or not my Wi-Fi chipset was supported, or installing the right graphics drivers. All I have to do is just use the dang thing.

So, how did it turn out? Not great.

The Librem 13 is a minimalistic-looking laptop with a slightly old Core i5 6200U Skylake processor; a cheap keyboard; a low-quality, 13.3-inch, 1080p matte screen; and a bad multitouch touchpad. On the plus side, the shell is completely void of branding, and you can actually open up the computer to swap RAM and storage, with support for both SATA and NVMe M.2 drives, and regular 2.5-inch drives. This customizability is rare in this MacBook Air-ish form factor, and I really appreciate it.

The biggest standout about the Librem 13's hardware are two physical switches on the hinge, one to disable the webcam and microphone, and another to disable Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. These hardware "kill switches" are a privacy nut's dream. Think of Edward Snowden's famous request for reporters to put their devices in a fridge to block radio signals, or Mark Zuckerberg's placement of tape on his webcam.

The laptop also runs on the Coreboot firmware, instead of the Intel Management Engine, which is another big plus to security.

I'll be honest with you: it's all probably overkill for me. Good or bad, I just don't worry very much about privacy and security outside of good password hygiene. But I can totally imagine someone in a more sensitive line of work than me, or a few more things to be paranoid about, buying this laptop specifically for these reasons.

It's only in recent years that touchpads on Windows computers have become tolerable to me. The Librem 13's touchpad is not tolerable. Outside of the fact that the surface is less pleasing to use than the glass of my MacBook's touchpad, cursor movement actually feels laggy when I'm using the touchpad, and I don't know whether the hardware or software is to blame. I don't love the keyboard, either. It feels soft and imprecise to me, but this is more of a taste issue and I've definitely gotten better on it over time. Also, one time the L key stopped working and I had to reboot to get it back. Not sure who to blame there.

The bigger problem is Linux. Out of the box, the Debian-based OS looks great, and I find it very intuitive and user-friendly. It's running a fairly clean install of Gnome 3 for a GUI, and I'm a fan. You can hit the "Purism Key" (a rebadged Windows key) to pull up the Activities Overview, where you can access a dock, switch between windows and desktops, and if you start typing you can search among available apps on the system, which is my preferred method of launching apps, akin to using Spotlight on a Mac.

But while PureOS includes a GUI App Store of sorts, called "Software," I ended up installing most of the applications I actually care about through the command line. I'm pretty comfortable with "sudo apt-get install" at this point, but using dpkg to install a .deb file and then using apt-get to install its dependencies (I'm 94 percent sure that's what I'm doing, at least) is not exactly what I'd call "user friendly."

At this point I have most of my must-have apps on this computer. Simplenote, Visual Studio Code, Chromium, and Slack. I tried and failed to install Spotify, so I'm just listening to music in the browser. My system is perfectly configured at this point for me to do my actual job of writing for the internet, my hobbies of JavaScript and Rust development, and my actual full-time occupation of watching YouTube videos and Twitch streams. I installed the Unity game engine after half an hour of command line toil, so I can't even say I'm missing out on that. The big thing Linux lacks for me is access to Adobe Premiere and After Effects, but nobody is perfect.

No! Okay, so I'm pleased with how relatively easy it is to use a preinstalled Linux system compared to installing it myself. But Linux is still a chore compared to Windows and Mac, and basically requires a familiarity with the command line to do anything interesting. Also, a lot of what I'm doing on this thing would work just as well or better on ChromeOS.

But also I'm just too frustrated by this hardware. The battery life is fine, but not great. Sometimes the computer doesnt sleep when I close it, so then it dies. The matte black design looked great for five seconds before it was covered in my sweaty fingerprints. And. This. Touchpad. Is. Driving. Me. Bonkers. For instance, the default configuration is for a two-finger click to emulate a middle click, which by convention on Linux is mapped to copy and paste. And I can't figure it out how to fix it. And for some reason moving the mouse with my index finger and clicking with my thumb counts as a two-finger click. And I hate it. But I'm almost done with the review so I'm not going to dig deep into some .conf file to solve the problem. I get to walk away.

Oh, and at the office I keep getting pop-over notifications about different network printers being discovered, which I cant figure out how to turn off without disabling all notifications. So thats fun.

If you care deeply about the ethical and privacy stance that this hardware and software combination represents, I must admit that your options are limited, and that this laptop may very well be your best option.

But for everyone else, this computer is not nearly worth the $1,399 plus price tag. If Linux is that important to you, there's much nicer hardware available for a much lower price. If Linux isn't a big draw, then I have no idea why you'd consider this over a Surface Laptop or a MacBook.

And before you ask: yes, I do feel like a bad person for saying mean things about this computer. To me, Linux represents everything that's worth rooting for in the technology world, a free and open source operating system that's not tied to serving the interests of a specific corporation. And the open hardware movement has an opportunity to make safer, more customizable, and more bespoke computers than big companies can be bothered to build. I want to live in a world where I can buy a good computer that I enjoy without having to give AppleGoogleMicrosoft my money or all my personal data. This Librem 13 feels like the Early Access version of that future, and apparently I can't be bothered to deal with the trade-offs. Which makes me part of the problem, and I'm sorry for that.

Go here to see the original:
Librem 13 laptop review: physical security for the paranoid - The Verge

To Protect Genetic Privacy, Encrypt Your DNA – WIRED

In 2007, DNA pioneer James Watson became the first person to have his entire genome sequencedmaking all of his 6 billion base pairs publicly available for research. Well, almost all of them. He left one spot blank, on the long arm of chromosome 19, where a gene called APOE lives. Certain variations in APOE increase your chances of developing Alzheimers, and Watson wanted to keep that information private.

Except it wasnt. Researchers quickly pointed out you could predict Watsons APOE variant based on signatures in the surrounding DNA. They didnt actually do it, but database managers wasted no time in redacting another two million base pairs surrounding the APOE gene.

This is the dilemma at the heart of precision medicine: It requires people to give up some of their privacy in service of the greater scientific good. To completely eliminate the risk of outing an individual based on their DNA records, youd have to strip it of the same identifying details that make it scientifically useful. But now, computer scientists and mathematicians are working toward an alternative solution. Instead of stripping genomic data, theyre encrypting it.

Gill Bejerano leads a developmental biology lab at Stanford that investigates the genetic roots of human disease. In 2013, when he realized he needed more genomic data, his lab joined Stanford Hospitals Pediatrics Departmentan arduous process that required extensive vetting and training of all his staff and equipment. This is how most institutions solve the privacy perils of data sharing. They limit who can access all the genomes in their possession to a trusted few, and only share obfuscated summary statistics more widely.

So when Bejerano found himself sitting in on a faculty talk given by Dan Boneh, head of the applied cryptography group at Stanford, he was struck with an idea. He scribbled down a mathematical formula for one of the genetic computations he uses often in his work. Afterward, he approached Boneh and showed it to him. Could you compute these outputs without knowing the inputs? he asked. Sure, said Boneh.

Last week, Bejerano and Boneh published a paper in Science that did just that. Using a cryptographic genome cloaking method, the scientists were able to do things like identify responsible mutations in groups of patients with rare diseases and compare groups of patients at two medical centers to find shared mutations associated with shared symptoms, all while keeping 97 percent of each participants unique genetic information completely hidden. They accomplished this by converting variations in each genome into a linear series of values. That allowed them to conduct any analyses they needed while only revealing genes relevant to that particular investigation.

Just like programs have bugs, people have bugs, says Bejerano. Finding disease-causing genetic traits is a lot like spotting flaws in computer code. You have to compare code that works to code that doesnt. But genetic data is much more sensitive, and people (rightly) worry that it might be used against them by insurers, or even stolen by hackers. If a patient held the cryptographic key to their data, they could get a valuable medical diagnosis while not exposing the rest of their genome to outside threats. You can make rules about not discriminating on the basis of genetics, or you can provide technology where you cant discriminate against people even if you wanted to, says Bejerano. Thats a much stronger statement.

The National Institutes of Health have been working toward such a technology since reidentification researchers first began connecting the dots in anonymous genomics data. In 2010, the agency founded a national center for Integrating Data for Analysis, Anonymization and Sharing housed on the campus of UC San Diego. And since 2015, iDash has been funding annual competitions to develop privacy-preserving genomics protocols. Another promising approach iDash has supported is something called fully homomorphic encryption, which allows users to run any computation they want on totally encrypted data without losing years of computing time.

Megan Molteni

The Go-To Gene Sequencing Machine With Very Strange Results

Sarah Zhang

Cheap DNA Sequencing Is Here. Writing DNA Is Next

Rachel Ehrenberg, Science News

Scrubbing IDs Out of Medical Records for Genetic Studies

Kristen Lauter, head of cryptography research at Microsoft, focuses on this form of encryption, and her team has taken home the iDash prize two years running. Critically, the method encodes the data in such a way that scientists dont lose the flexibility to perform medically useful genetic tests. Unlike previous encryption schemes, Lauters tool preserves the underlying mathematical structure of the data. That allows computers to do the math that delivers genetic diagnoses, for example, on totally encrypted data. Scientists get a key to decode the final results, but they never see the source.

This is extra important as more and more genetic data moves off local servers and into the cloud. The NIH lets users download human genomic data from its repositories, and in 2014, the agency started letting people store and analyze that data in private or commercial cloud environments. But under NIHs policy, its the scientists using the datanot the cloud service providerresponsible with ensuring its security. Cloud providers can get hacked, or subpoenaed by law enforcement, something researchers have no control over. That is, unless theres a viable encryption for data stored in the cloud.

If we dont think about it now, in five to 10 years a lot peoples genomic information will be used in ways they did not intend, says Lauter. But encryption is a funny technology to work with, she says. One that requires building trust between researchers and consumers. You can propose any crazy encryption you want and say its secure. Why should anyone believe you?

Thats where federal review comes in. In July, Lauters group, along with researchers from IBM and academic institutions around the world launched a process to standardize homomorphic encryption protocols. The National Institute for Standards and Technology will now begin reviewing draft standards and collecting public comments. If all goes well, genomics researchers and privacy advocates might finally have something they can agree on.

Read this article:
To Protect Genetic Privacy, Encrypt Your DNA - WIRED

Cloud Encryption Market Worth 2401.9 Million USD by 2022 – Markets Insider

PUNE, India, August 23, 2017 /PRNewswire/ --

According to a new market research report "Cloud Encryption Market by Component (Solution and Service), Service Model (Infrastructure-as-a-Service, Software-as-a-Service, and Platform-as-a-Service), Organization Size, Vertical, and Region - Global Forecast to 2022", published by MarketsandMarkets, the market size is expected to grow from USD 645.4 Million in 2017 to USD 2,401.9 Million by 2022, at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 30.1%.

(Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20160303/792302 )

Browse 64 Market Data Tables and 45 Figures spread through 184 Pages and in-depth TOC on "Cloud Encryption Market"

http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/cloud-encryption-market-158713019.html

Early buyers will receive 10% customization on this report

The demand for cloud encryption is majorly driven by stringent government regulations and the need to protect mission critical data residing on the cloud. With the rising demand for cloud and virtualization across different industry verticals, the adoption rate of cloud encryption among enterprises is expected to gain a major traction during the forecast period.

The Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) model is expected to hold the largest market share

The IaaS segment includes the offerings such as servers, storages, and networking infrastructure on-premises private cloud. This infrastructure is used to run the applications on the public cloud. It enables the organizations to reduce the total cost of ownership as the infrastructure is being provided by third-party vendors in the form of cloud-based data centers. However, virtualization introduces new security challenges. Thus, enterprises are adopting cloud encryption solution and services to run business-critical functions securely.

Ask for PDF Brochure @http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/pdfdownload.asp?id=158713019

The telecom and IT vertical is expected to grow at the fastest rate

The telecom and IT vertical involves high usage of cloud-based applications for their business operations and is thus frequently attacked by cybercriminals. Companies in this sector are adopting cloud encryption solutions so as to provide their customers risk-free services. The usage of cloud encryption has allowed users to save the important information on their mobile devices and use that information through the cloud without any risk. Therefore, cloud encryption solutions are helping telecom and IT companies in enhancing their services and providing secure information to customers while complying with regulations.

North America is expected to contribute to the largest market share; Asia Pacific to grow the fastest during the forecast period

North America is expected to have the largest market share and dominate the Cloud Encryption Market from 2017 to 2022, owing to the early adoption of new and emerging technologies and the presence of a large number of players in this region. APAC offers extensive growth avenues in the Cloud Encryption Market, owing to a widespread presence of SMEs that are extensively adopting cloud technology.

The major vendors providing cloud encryption solutions and services are Thales e-Security (La Defense, France), Gemalto N.V. (Amsterdam, Netherlands), Sophos Group plc (Abingdon, UK), Symantec Corporation (California, US), Skyhigh Networks (California, US), Netskope Inc. (California, US), CipherCloud (California, US), HyTrust, Inc. (California, US), Trend Micro Incorporated (Tokyo, Japan), Vaultive, Inc. (Massachusetts, US), and TWD Industries AG (Unteriberg, Switzerland).

Enquiry Before Buying @http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Enquiry_Before_Buying.asp?id=158713019

Browse Related Reports

Cloud Security Market by Service Type (IAM, DLP, IDS/IPS, SIEM, and Encryption), Security Type, Service Model (IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS), Deployment Type (Public, Private, and Hybrid), Organization Size, Vertical, and Region - Global Forecast to 2022 http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/cloud-security-market-100018098.html

Mobile Encryption Market by Component (Solution and Services), Application (Disk Encryption, File/Folder Encryption, Communication Encryption, and Cloud Encryption), End-User Type, Deployment Type, Vertical, and Region - Global Forecast to 2022 http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/mobile-encryption-market-120317676.html

Know More About our Knowledge Store @http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Knowledgestore.asp

About MarketsandMarkets

MarketsandMarkets provides quantified B2B research on 30,000 high growth niche opportunities/threats which will impact 70% to 80% of worldwide companies' revenues. Currently servicing 5000 customers worldwide including 80% of global Fortune 1000 companies as clients. Almost 75,000 top officers across eight industries worldwide approach MarketsandMarkets for their painpoints around revenues decisions.

Our 850 fulltime analyst and SMEs at MarketsandMarkets are tracking global high growth markets following the "Growth Engagement Model - GEM". The GEM aims at proactive collaboration with the clients to identify new opportunities, identify most important customers, write "Attack, avoid and defend" strategies, identify sources of incremental revenues for both the company and its competitors. MarketsandMarkets now coming up with 1,500 MicroQuadrants (Positioning top players across leaders, emerging companies, innovators, strategic players) annually in high growth emerging segments. MarketsandMarkets is determined to benefit more than 10,000 companies this year for their revenue planning and help them take their innovations/disruptions early to the market by providing them research ahead of the curve.

MarketsandMarkets' flagship competitive intelligence and market research platform, "RT" connects over 200,000 markets and entire value chains for deeper understanding of the unmet insights along with market sizing and forecasts of niche markets.

Contact: Mr. Rohan MarketsandMarkets 701 Pike Street Suite 2175, Seattle, WA 98101, United States Tel: +1-888-600-6441 Email: rel="nofollow">sales@marketsandmarkets.com

Visit Our Blog @ http://www.marketsandmarketsblog.com/market-reports/telecom-it Connect with us on LinkedIn @ http://www.linkedin.com/company/marketsandmarkets

Follow this link:
Cloud Encryption Market Worth 2401.9 Million USD by 2022 - Markets Insider

Open source and proprietary software solutions: the key for an analytic project – Information Age

With the entire approved analytic process in a repeatable workflow organisations spend less time on repeating mundane tasks and process, and spend more time on valuable aspects of the analysis

In the world of data analysis it may be no coincidence that open source tools like the R statistical computing language have blossomed as analytics and big data have matured together.

Hadoop, Python There seems to be a special kind of magic between the curious minds of data analysts (with a small a as they may be line of business users that dont have a degree in statistics or a qualification in coding) and with new ways of exploring the world.

Open source software has proven itself to be a very useful way of rapidly finding quality insights out about the world when out to the challenging task of finding insights from the enormous volumes of data out there. Big data analytics provides an opportunity for open source data quality tools to deliver new insights.

>See also:Using data analytics to improve business processes and reduce waste

From a bottom-line focus, using open source solutions as part of the enterprise mix can help provide a cost-effective method to help get successful analytics projects off the ground.

Certainly, any business still using coding-intensive legacy architectures, or SAS solutions, will find themselves easily seduced the speed and versatility of modern products in the analytical toolkit.

Bringing these products and tools together can be complicated, but linking them together in one platform provides the fun and thrill for the analysts who want to use their favourite tools, and still maintain the governance, repeatability and reliability the business needs to really create a long-lived culture of analytics.

Its a plain fact that much of an analysts role, be they a specialist quant or a general business user, is more likely than not filled with the tedium of finding, cleaning, prepping, and cleansing data. By that stage theyve lost the enjoyment of what made the relationship with data special in the first place.

The trouble is that many legacy solutions cant adapt to the changing data landscape. Some were not designed to deal with the variety of data structured, unstructured, and semi-structured, or in the various types it is available from numerous applications and sources. This is why its sensible to allow for a flexible environment for analysts to take advantage of data across any system and in any format.

>See also:Data leader on the impact and necessity of data analytics

If this, the foundational element of the data journey, can be made as seamless and easy as possible, then the analytical detectives can be doing what they trained and are paid to do. Thats better for them, and its better for the business, as that passion and brain power is not atrophying with the tedious end of the mundane elements of data preparation.

Additionally, most data scientists today build predictive and machine learning models in open source programming languages and then need to deploy that code into different technology frameworks.

Its time consuming, error-prone and requires additional development resources often stalling data science projects altogether. Its important to pay attention to any roadblocks between data scientists and development teams by accelerating the model making and model deployment processes.

It can require considerable coding expertise to harness complex sets of open source tools, adding difficulty, not least because the skills are in high demand and fetch a premium on the market.

As a consequence code-free environments for analytics that simplify data access, preparation, analysis, and consumption are becoming a must in the modern enterprise.

A project manager should be able to quickly prepare, clean and combine data from any range of data sources. It should be a breeze to implement fuzzy matching techniques to improve the accuracy of results, and however the project is designed, as a matter of course it should reduce the dependency and reliance on data scientists and IT wherever possible. Its simply not sustainable to do this in any other way.

>See also:Machine learning and AI is changing how data science is leveraged

Following the data preparation and quality improvement, the next step involves taking that data and incorporating predictive or advanced analytics to make or to further improve business decisions. And in the modern, agile enterprise, this should mean doing this without having to write code if users dont wish to.

Once those elements are accounted for it should be a simple matter to build repeatable workflow processes that provides the business with greater data consistency and accuracy and result in tangible business benefits once the insights are acted upon.

With the entire approved analytic process in a repeatable workflow organisations spend less time on repeating mundane tasks and process, and spend more time on valuable aspects of the analysis. Analysts will enjoy themselves once more, following their curiosity and solving problems rather than administrating.

This is important. Todays data scientists are spending too much time building advanced models that never reach deployment. Gartner stated that many projects remain stuck at the pilot stage.

>See also:Is Hadoops position as the king of big data storage under threat?

Only 15% of businesses reported deploying their big data project to production in the Business Intelligence & Analytics Summit 2016 research. Yhat states that only 10% of predictive models actually get deployed. And according to TDWI, models can take an average of six to nine months to get deployed. Thats not a sustainable way of working.

Modelling tools need to be more accessible to accelerate deployment, and to save time and frustration. In part, its worth bringing joy back to data scientists and business users alike. With a wealth of data out there, its a good time to encourage and empower the people who love to solve complex business problems.

Sourced byMatthew Madden, director, Product Marketing at Alteryx

The UKs largest conference fortechleadership,TechLeadersSummit, returns on 14 September with 40+ top execs signed up to speak about the challenges and opportunities surrounding the most disruptive innovations facing the enterprise today.Secure your place at this prestigious summit byregisteringhere

Visit link:
Open source and proprietary software solutions: the key for an analytic project - Information Age