The World’s Email Encryption Software Relies on One Guy …

Update, Feb. 5, 2015, 8:10 p.m.: After this article appeared,Werner Koch informed us that last week he was awarded a one-time grant of $60,000 from Linux Foundation's Core Infrastructure Initiative. Werner told us he only received permission to disclose it after our article published. Meanwhile, since our story was posted, donations flooded Werner's website donation page and he reached his funding goal of $137,000. In addition, Facebook and the online payment processor Stripe each pledged to donate $50,000 a year to Kochs project.

The man who built the free email encryption software used by whistleblower Edward Snowden, as well as hundreds of thousands of journalists, dissidents and security-minded people around the world, is running out of money to keep his project alive.

Werner Koch wrote the software, known as Gnu Privacy Guard, in 1997, and since then has been almost single-handedly keeping it alive with patches and updates from his home in Erkrath, Germany. Now 53, he is running out of money and patience with being underfunded.

"I'm too idealistic," he told me in an interview at a hacker convention in Germany in December. "In early 2013 I was really about to give it all up and take a straight job." But then the Snowden news broke, and "I realized this was not the time to cancel."

Like many people who build security software, Koch believes that offering the underlying software code for free is the best way to demonstrate that there are no hidden backdoors in it giving access to spy agencies or others. However, this means that many important computer security tools are built and maintained by volunteers.

Now, more than a year after Snowden's revelations, Koch is still struggling to raise enough money to pay himself and to fulfill his dream of hiring a full-time programmer. He says he's made about $25,000 per year since 2001 a fraction of what he could earn in private industry. In December, he launched a fundraising campaign that has garnered about $43,000 to date far short of his goal of $137,000 which would allow him to pay himself a decent salary and hire a full-time developer.

The fact that so much of the Internet's security software is underfunded is becoming increasingly problematic. Last year, in the wake of the Heartbleed bug, I wrote that while the U.S. spends more than $50 billion per year on spying and intelligence, pennies go to Internet security. The bug revealed that an encryption program used by everybody from Amazon to Twitter was maintained by just four programmers, only one of whom called it his full-time job. A group of tech companies stepped in to fund it.

Koch's code powers most of the popular email encryption programs GPGTools, Enigmail, and GPG4Win. "If there is one nightmare that we fear, then it's the fact that Werner Koch is no longer available," said Enigmail developer Nicolai Josuttis. "It's a shame that he is alone and that he has such a bad financial situation."

The programs are also underfunded. Enigmail is maintained by two developers in their spare time. Both have other full-time jobs. Enigmail's lead developer, Patrick Brunschwig, told me that Enigmail receives about $1,000 a year in donations just enough to keep the website online.

GPGTools, which allows users to encrypt email from Apple Mail, announced in October that it would start charging users a small fee. The other popular program, GPG4Win, is run by Koch himself.

Email encryption first became available to the public in 1991, when Phil Zimmermann released a free program called Pretty Good Privacy, or PGP, on the Internet. Prior to that, powerful computer-enabled encryption was only available to the government and large companies that could pay licensing fees. The U.S. government subsequently investigated Zimmermann for violating arms trafficking laws because high-powered encryption was subject to export restrictions.

In 1997, Koch attended a talk by free software evangelist Richard Stallman, who was visiting Germany. Stallman urged the crowd to write their own version of PGP. "We can't export it, but if you write it, we can import it," he said.

Inspired, Koch decided to try. "I figured I can do it," he recalled. He had some time between consulting projects. Within a few months, he released an initial version of the software he called Gnu Privacy Guard, a play on PGP and an homage to Stallman's free Gnu operating system.

Koch's software was a hit even though it only ran on the Unix operating system. It was free, the underlying software code was open for developers to inspect and improve, and it wasn't subject to U.S. export restrictions.

Koch continued to work on GPG in between consulting projects until 1999, when the German government gave him a grant to make GPG compatible with the Microsoft Windows operating system. The money allowed him to hire a programmer to maintain the software while also building the Windows version, which became GPG4Win. This remains the primary free encryption program for Windows machines.

In 2005, Koch won another contract from the German government to support the development of another email encryption method. But in 2010, the funding ran out.

For almost two years, Koch continued to pay his programmer in the hope that he could find more funding. "But nothing came," Koch recalled. So, in August 2012, he had to let the programmer go. By summer 2013, Koch was himself ready to quit.

But after the Snowden news broke, Koch decided to launch a fundraising campaign. He set up an appeal at a crowdsourcing website, made t-shirts and stickers to give to donors, and advertised it on his website. In the end, he earned just $21,000.

The campaign gave Koch, who has an 8-year-old daughter and a wife who isn't working, some breathing room. But when I asked him what he will do when the current batch of money runs out, he shrugged and said he prefers not to think about it. "I'm very glad that there is money for the next three months," Koch said. "Really I am better at programming than this business stuff."

Here is the original post:
The World's Email Encryption Software Relies on One Guy ...

Encryption breakthrough could keep prying eyes away from …

Researchers have found a way to put handshake-style encryption in email and other communication tools, which is good news for spies.

Secret handshakes have long been a method of verification for spies in the field, but digitally things are about to change in a big way. Similar to the physical handshake, digital handshakes are used to verify communication participants identities in real time.

While fine for instant messaging, it has proven impossible to replicate in communication methods such as email whereby messages may need to be decoded long after they were originally sent.

However, a research team from the Stevens Institute of Technology has revealed a new cryptography breakthrough that could solve this 15-year-old problem. This could be hugely beneficial not only to intelligence agencies, but anyone with an interest in secure communications, such as journalists and doctors.

The demand for tools like this is incredible, said Giuseppe Ateniese, who led the research. Privacy is growing more and more important, and encryption is essential for almost everyone.

To achieve the breakthrough, Ateniese and his team combined existing key-based cryptographic algorithms in a novel arrangement to create a system called matchmaking encryption. This simultaneously checks the identities of both the sender and receiver before decrypting the message.

Crucially, matchmaking encryption does away with the need for real-time interactions, allowing messages to be sent on a dead drop basis and read at a later date.

A dead drop is like when a spy leaves a message behind a rock, Ateniese said. It can be used when you need to send a message to someone whos not there at the moment, but will find it if he or she is the intended recipient.

To use this form of encryption, both parties create policies or a list of traits that describe the people with whom they are willing to communicate. When both digital policies are happy that each party is who they say they are, the message will be sent.

Aside from person-to-person communication, it could also be used to group classes of people together. So, for example, CIA agents in New York could refuse to accept messages from anyone other than Philadelphia-based FBI agents.

Messages that dont fit the bill will not be decrypted, with no information being sent. Team member Danilo Francati said: This is important for intelligence I dont want to reveal to you that Im an FBI agent, so I want assurances that you are who you say you are. Matchmaking encryption provides that assurance as well as a level of privacy thats stronger than anything else thats available.

The team believes that the breakthrough opens new frontiers in secure communication and that additional applications will quickly emerge as researchers explore the new technology and make matchmaking encryption more powerful.

Ateniese will present the teams findings at the upcoming Crypto 2019 conference.

See the original post here:
Encryption breakthrough could keep prying eyes away from ...

Bradley Manning Admits Providing Files to WikiLeaks – The …

He said he then tried to reach out to The New York Times by calling a phone number for the newspapers public editor an ombudsman who is not part of the newsroom and leaving a voice mail message that was not returned.

In January 2010, around the time when Mr. Manning called the public editors line, voice mail messages were checked by Michael McElroy, the assistant to Clark Hoyt, then the public editor. Both Mr. Hoyt, now the editor at large at Bloomberg News, and Mr. McElroy, now a staff editor at The Times, said on Thursday that they had no recollection of hearing such a message.

We got hundreds of calls a week, and I tried to go through them all, Mr. McElroy said. If Id heard something like that, I certainly hope I would have flagged it immediately.

Private Manning eventually decided to release the information by uploading it to WikiLeaks. To do it, he said, he used a broadband connection at a Barnes & Noble store because his aunts house in a Maryland suburb, where he was staying, had lost its Internet connection in a snowstorm.

In February 2010, after he returned to Iraq, Private Manning sent more files to WikiLeaks, including a helicopter gunship video of a 2007 episode in Iraq in which American forces killed a group of men, including two Reuters journalists, and then fired again on a van that pulled up to help the victims.

Private Manning said the video troubled him, both because of the shooting of the second group of people, who were not a threat but merely good Samaritans, and because of what he described as the seemingly delightful blood lust expressed by the airmen in the recording. He also learned that Reuters had been seeking the video without success.

Private Manning said he copied the files from the secure network onto disks, which he took back to his quarters and transferred to his personal laptop before uploading them to WikiLeaks initially through its Web site, and later using a directory the group designated for him on a cloud drop box server.

Read the rest here:
Bradley Manning Admits Providing Files to WikiLeaks - The ...

Edward Snowden’s quandary – Business Insider

John Oliver shows Snowden truck nuts. screenshot/HBO At the beginning of his interview with former NSA contractor Edward Snowden in Moscow, HBO host John Oliver set the stage: He asked the 31-year-old how much he missed certain things in America, including "truck nuts."

Snowden, who did not know what truck nuts are, said: "You really thought ahead."

"Well, at least one of us did," Oliver replied. "You know because of the um, quandary, the Kafkaesque nightmare that you're in."

Snowden, who has been living in an undisclosed location in Russia after flying from Hong Kong to Moscow on June 23, 2013, could do nothing but take the jab and nod.

The US government reportedly charged the 31-year-old with three felonies, including two under the World War I-era Espionage Act, after he stole up to 1.77 million classified NSA documents and fled from Hawaii to Hong Kong and eventually Moscow.

Given his value to Russian President Vladimir Putin and the unlikelihood that he would get a favorable deal to return home, Snowden is a self-avowed human rights activist living under the watchful eye of Putin's intelligence services.

One could say he's stuck in a "nightmarish situation which most people can somehow relate to, although strongly surreal. "

After the quip, Oliver started the interview.

screenshot/HBO

Here's the clip. It all starts around 16:10:

Read more from the original source:
Edward Snowden's quandary - Business Insider

Out in the Open: Inside the Operating System Edward Snowden …

When NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden first emailed Glenn Greenwald, he insisted on using email encryption software called PGP for all communications. But this month, we learned that Snowden used another technology to keep his communications out of the NSA's prying eyes. It's called Tails. And naturally, nobody knows exactly who created it.

Tails is a kind of computer-in-a-box. You install it on a DVD or USB drive, boot up the computer from the drive and, voila, you're pretty close to anonymous on the internet. At its heart, Tails is a version of the Linux operating system optimized for anonymity. It comes with several privacy and encryption tools, most notably Tor, an application that anonymizes a user's internet traffic by routing it through a network of computers run by volunteers around the world.

Snowden, Greenwald and their collaborator, documentary film maker Laura Poitras, used it because, by design, Tails doesn't store any data locally. This makes it virtually immune to malicious software, and prevents someone from performing effective forensics on the computer after the fact. That protects both the journalists, and often more importantly, their sources.

"The installation and verification has a learning curve to make sure it is installed correctly," Poitras told WIRED by e-mail. "But once the set up is done, I think it is very easy to use."

An Operating System for Anonymity

Originally developed as a research project by the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Tor has been used by a wide range of people who care about online anonymity: everyone from Silk Road drug dealers, to activists, whistleblowers, stalking victims and people who simply like their online privacy.

Tails makes it much easier to use Tor and other privacy tools. Once you boot into Tails which requires no special setup Tor runs automatically. When you're done using it, you can boot back into your PC's normal operating system, and no history from your Tails session will remain.

>'The masters of today's Internet... really want our lives to be more and more transparent online, and this is only for their own benefit.'

The Tails Development Team

The developers of Tails are, appropriately, anonymous. All of WIREDS's questions were collectively and anonymously answered by the group's members via email.

They're protecting their identities, in part, to help protect the code from government interference. "The NSA has been pressuring free software projects and developers in various ways," the group says, referring to a a conference last year at which Linux creator Linus Torvalds implied that the NSA had asked him to place a backdoor in the operating system.

But the Tails team is also trying to strike a blow against the widespread erosion of online privacy. "The masters of today's Internet, namely the marketing giants like Google, Facebook, and Yahoo, and the spying agencies, really want our lives to be more and more transparent online, and this is only for their own benefit," the group says. "So trying to counterbalance this tendency seems like a logical position for people developing an operating system that defends privacy and anonymity online."

But since we don't know who wrote Tails, how do we now it isn't some government plot designed to snare activists or criminals? A couple of ways, actually. One of the Snowden leaks show the NSA complaining about Tails in a Power Point Slide; if it's bad for the NSA, it's safe to say it's good for privacy. And all of the Tails code is open source, so it can be inspected by anyone worried about foul play. "Some of us simply believe that our work, what we do, and how we do it, should be enough to trust Tails, without the need of us using our legal names," the group says.

According to the group, Tails began five years ago. "At that time some of us were already Tor enthusiasts and had been involved in free software communities for years," they says. "But we felt that something was missing to the panorama: a toolbox that would bring all the essential privacy enhancing technologies together and made them ready to use and accessible to a larger public."

The developers initially called their project Amnesia and based it on an existing operating system called Incognito. Soon the Amnesia and Incognito projects merged into Tails, which stands for The Amnesic Incognito Live System.

And while the core Tails group focuses on developing the operating system for laptops and desktop computers, a separate group is making a mobile version that can run on Android and Ubuntu tablets, provided the user has root access to the device.

Know Your Limitations

In addition to Tor, Tails includes privacy tools like PGP, the password management system KeePassX, and the chat encryption plugin Off-the-Record. But Tails doesn't just bundle a bunch of off the shelf tools into a single package. Many of the applications have been modified to improve the privacy of its users.

But no operating system or privacy tool can guarantee complete protection in all situations.

Although Tails includes productivity applications like OpenOffice, GIMP and Audacity, it doesn't make a great everyday operating system. That's because over the course of day-to-day use, you're likely to use service or another that could be linked with your identity, blowing your cover entirely. Instead, Tails should only be used for the specific activities that need to be kept anonymous, and nothing else.

The developers list several other security warnings in the site documentation.

Of course the group is constantly working to fix security issues, and they're always looking for volunteers to help with the project. They've also applied for a grant from the Knight Foundation, and are collecting donations via the Freedom of the Press Foundation, the group that first disclosed Tails's role in the Snowden story.

That money could go a long way toward helping journalists and others stay away from the snoops. Reporters, after all, aren't always the most tech-savvy people. As Washington Post reporter Barton Gellman told the Freedom of the Press Foundation, "Tails puts the essential tools in one place, with a design that makes it hard to screw them up. I could not have talked to Edward Snowden without this kind of protection. I wish I'd had it years ago."

Link:
Out in the Open: Inside the Operating System Edward Snowden ...

Chelsea Mannings Lawyer Says Shes Very Concerned for Her at Tribeca …

At the Wednesday night premiere of XY Chelsea at the Tribeca Film Festival, director Tim Hawkins mourned the fact that the subject of the documentary, Chelsea Manning, couldnt be in attendance.

In 2013, Manning, a former U.S. Army intelligence analyst in Baghdad, received a 35-year sentence for leaking hundreds of thousands of classified documents. It was reportedly the longest ever sentence for a leak of U.S. government information. Four years later, after Manning had already survived two suicide attempts and extended periods of solitary confinement in prison, President Obama commuted her sentence. Now, two years after that life-changing commutation, Manning is currently incarcerated once againfor refusing to testify in a grand jury investigation into WikiLeaks.

When I first started making this film, Chelsea was still in prison in Kansas, Hawkins explained. And in one of the letters that she sent me, she made a kind of dark joke about how she thought shes going to miss the premiere. That was three years ago. A lot has happened since then, and just weeks ago we were making preparations for her to be here with us today.

In a conversation after the filmone that Manning would have participated in if she was not currently incarceratedlegal counsel Nancy Hollander told the crowd that shes very concerned for Chelsea. Shes not in solitary anymore, but Im very concerned about her being there and Im concerned about what this means for the rest of her life, that this is just another example. The government is going to continue to go after her. Theres really no reason for them to need Chelseas testimony at this point, as far as Im concerned.

Asked to clarify the stand that Manning is currently taking, Hollander continued, Its an objection to the process. The grand jury is a secret organization that we shouldnt have in our system to begin with. If she testifies, she runs into tremendous risk to herself, and she also doesnt believe that we should have grand juries. For her, its another step in the principled actions that she has taken. Theyre very courageous actions. This is something I would expect from her.

Hollanders statements line up with the portrait that XY Chelsea paints. Its an intimate study of a woman with no apparent sense of self-preservationsomeone who throws herself again and again into principled fights, at the cost of her emotional and mental well-being, and ultimately her freedom.

The documentary also helps to shed light on the personal toll of Mannings courageous choices. While Manning has proven herself willing to risk almost anything to take a stand, she has been severely traumatized by the repercussions of her actions. During one of the bleakest interviews that she gives throughout the film, Manning describes her experience in solitary confinement prior to her military hearing. At one point, in Kuwait, she was kept in a cage for 60 days, for up to 23-and-a-half hours per day. Manning struggles to articulate what she experienced there, before concluding, I was alive but also dead, and Ive been dead since. For Manning, even after her release, freedom feels like purgatory. She explains her inability to escape this sense of impending doomparanoia that has since proved prophetic.

Now that Chelsea Manning is back in hell, it feels more imperative than ever to understand how she ended up there in the first place.

I was alive but also dead, and Ive been dead since.

Chelsea Manning

The documentary begins with news of the commutation of Mannings sentence. It follows her from her release to a safe house, and then out into the world. At various points we return to the past, reconstructing Mannings whistleblowing, her trial, and her time in prison through messages, phone calls, and news footage, all framed through Mannings own recollections. In the present-day narrative, we see Manning physically adjusting to freedom. In her words, learning how to be again. Of course, Manning has to do more than just be; shes a public figure now, and we watch her navigate fameinterviews, photoshoots, her first viral tweet. Some people want to hear from Manning, learn more about why she did what she did. Others, like threatening trolls who call her a traitor, have already made up their minds.

XY Chelsea is in part an effort to refute the narratives that formed around Manning when she first entered the publics consciousness, like takes that attributed her decision to give classified documents to WikiLeaks to gender dysphoria-related distress. To hear Chelsea Manning tell it, she was disturbed by what was being done in the name of the American people in Iraq and Afghanistan, from civilian deaths to torture tactics. In her words, life was cheap in Iraq. While on leave, Manning recalled feeling as if everyday Americans had forgotten about the war, and were unaware of its atrocities. She had access to classified documents that would provide a window into these wartime realities; moreover, she felt guilt over her complicity. Manning attempted to contact multiple mainstream news outlets, but wasnt getting anywhere. Knowing that she needed to leak the documents before returning to Iraq, she turned to WikiLeaks.

During the films talkback, Hawkins emphasized, Really, if you honestly look at the interaction between [Assange and Manning] it wasnt the kind of thing thats been built up by the media. And I think, you know, we often make these sort of associations, that theyre kind of part of a cabal, that Snowden and Assange and Chelsea are all friends and talking on the phone and thats just not the caseI think what this film was really about is firstly the personal story, and re-centering the perspective.

An important part of that reclamation is hearing Manning talk about her transition, on her own terms. Manning says that she always intended to go public as a whistleblower, but was afraid that being trans would take over everything else. She served her sentence in an all-male prison, where she was able to successfully sue to begin hormone therapy. As a trans woman in prison, Manning remembers being ogled and judged by fellow prisoners and guards. She says that the guards would often walk in on her while changing; and then, she adds, there were the strip searches. In a recorded excerpt of a prison phone call, an emotional Manning can be heard pleading, I want to be treated like a human being, I want to be treated like a woman. Painful descriptions of an attempted suicide attempt underline the direness of the situation that Manning had found herself inbelieving, at that point, that she would spend the rest of her life behind bars.

Once she was released Manning wasted little time putting her platform to use, throwing herself into activist work before she had begun to adjust to life outside. She even launched a Senate campaign, in part galvanized by the rise of the alt-right. At one point in the documentary, explaining why she felt the need to speak out against fascism, Manning asks, What are they going to do, throw me in prison? Or kill me? Theyre going to do that anyway.

This anti-fascist fight quickly led to a huge controversy: Manning, in what she describes as an effort to learn more about her enemy, attended an alt-right event. While Manning was transparent about her efforts and her motives, many accused her of hanging out with neo-Nazis and bombarded her with criticism on social media. Documentary footage taken in the midst of the backlash shows Manning extremely upset, mainly with herself. A subsequent tweet sent from the roof of a building sparked fears that Manning might attempt suicide. While she was ultimately fine, she took a step back from her campaign in an effort to focus on her health.

At one point in the film, Manning insists, Im not a hero; she is, however, someone who firmly believes that no one should sit around waiting for a saviorthat its not going to stop until we stop them. This core belief illuminates Mannings actions. She is someone who stands up for what she believes in, often past her human limits.

Speaking on Mannings current incarceration, Janus Rose, a friend and member of Chelseas jail support committee, said, She really is concerned about using this as an opportunity to engage in another protest against a system that she finds unjust. Later on, Rose added, She didnt want to just kind of fall into obscurity when she was released. She wanted to seize this moment and use it to produce some kind of good, because shes always kind of been the kind of person that cant really just like sit by when she knows she can do something. I always tell people thats the most consistent thing about her personality, is that in every phase of her life that I know about, she seems to, when given an opportunity to do something, she has this bias toward action. And you know, sometimes its good, sometimes it backfires. But I think its great and its good that we have people like that.

Another Manning lawyer, Vince Ward, agreed, saying that Chelseas not a typical person. He continued, Theres something about being around people who are sacrificial to an extent, and I didnt really think that existed until I was around Chelseathat there were people who were literally willing to do something that was so contrary to their self-interest because they felt that strongly about something."

I know that she says shes not special, but I think theres something special about that rebellious spirit, Hawkins chimed in. But at the same time, if you act alone against a huge institution like the U.S. government, its going to crush you. Its going to swallow you up, and so whilst we kind of venerate and can sometimes martyrize figures like Chelsea, whistleblowers who stand up, actually what we really need to do is be getting behind them collectively, because its only going to be through collective action that we actually do make any sort of real changes... You need the rebels and people like Chelsea, but you also need all of us to really rally around. And I think now is a great moment for us to help her.

At the beginning of the film, Manning confesses that she loves a good coming-of-age story. Its a sentiment made all the more poignant as we see how Manning used the army to escape a largely unhappy adolescence, before moving from the military to prison, and essentially losing a decade in the process. As Rose put it, She didnt really get to have a young adulthood and all of a sudden she comes out and shes, you know, 29 approaching 30 years old and the world has changed.

Now, Mannings life has once again been put on hold, as her friends and supporters eagerly wait for the day that she can start learning how to be all over again.

Original post:
Chelsea Mannings Lawyer Says Shes Very Concerned for Her at Tribeca ...

XY Chelsea Film Review: Doc Tackles Chelsea Mannings Very In …

Im not a hero, says Chelsea Manning toward the end of Tim Travers Hawkinss XY Chelsea, a riveting but often frustrating documentary that focuses mainly on Mannings 2017 release from jail, where she spent seven years for sharing classified military documents. During her time in prison, Manning came out as a trans woman, and on her release, she takes delight in putting on ultra-red lipstick and growing her hair long, which was not allowed in the all-male facility where she was detained.

Manning is currently back in prison for refusing to testify to a grand jury against Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks leader who released Mannings documents and videos online after The New York Times and the Washington Post expressed no interest in this information in 2010. It is not made entirely clear in XY Chelsea just what Manning feels about Assange, but she is likely martyring herself again purely on principle over a man to whom she has no loyalty. Assange might be unsavory, but from Mannings perspective, the U.S. government is worse.

In a public interview with a New Yorker reporter that is shown here, Manning is asked tough, but fair questions about what she did and why she chose WikiLeaks, and she responds very defensively and inconclusively. There is so much of this story that needs further explanation, information, and context, that judgment regarding much of what we are being presented has to be suspended for now.

Also Read: Wu-Tang Clan, Chelsea Manning Docs Set Showtime Premiere Dates

There is always a sense here of Mannings emotional and physical fragility, and this is the aspect of XY Chelsea that is particularly difficult to parse. We are shown various people who have been drawn into trying to help and protect Manning both legally and emotionally, and once she is freed from prison they coalesce into a team that includes publicists. Manning poses for photos that present her visually as a kind of Edie Sedgwick of whistleblowing, and the effect is uneasy because it is clear that Manning does not quite know how to position herself for the public. The tragic aspect of this is that Manning is often so bright and appealing on camera that she might have made an impact in so many other ways if the pressures of her early life hadnt led her into joining the military.

Manning was born in Oklahoma in 1987, and both of her parents were alcoholics. From what we hear, Manning led a very insecure life as a child and adolescent, and she was pressured to conform, which is what led her to sign up for the military in 2007. At five-foot-two, the rebellious Manning did not fit into this new environment in any sense, yet the army was so in need of recruits that she was eventually entrusted with classified information.

See Photo: Chelsea Manning Poses for Vogue: 'Guess This Is What Freedom Looks Like'

Manning says here that, the Iraq War had left the consciousness of America by 2010, and she was horrified by how life was cheap in Iraq. The videos that Manning released via WikiLeaks exposed civilian deaths that were covered up as the deaths of enemy combatants, and Manning stresses several times in XY Chelsea that she knew exactly what was in all the documents and that no harm could have come to military sources by releasing this information this is a point that is surely up for some debate. There are no easy answers here and many vexing questions.

Hawkins does not interview Mannings father, who seems to be at the root of so many of Mannings problems, but he does talk to her mother Susan, who suffered a stroke a few years ago. Susan looks very much like Chelsea, and in the fragments of speech we hear from her she expresses love for her daughter and remembers how Chelsea used to command three computer stations at home.

Also Read: Chelsea Manning Blasts Trump's Transgender Military Ban: 'Sounds Like Cowardice'

Manning is articulate and clearly intelligent, and she was self-aware enough to call herself nave in a computer message we see on screen in the lead-up to her releasing the classified documents. That navet gets her into trouble when she attempts to engage with people on Twitter and eventually runs for office. Manning makes the mistake of attending an alt-right function in order to infiltrate the enemy, but this military tactic earns her scorn from her Twitter followers, and this leads to a message from her on Twitter that reads Im sorry underneath a photo of a womans feet on the ledge of a building. (Manning attempted suicide twice while in prison.)

The story of Chelsea Manning is still very much in process, and we are not going to understand some of its ramifications for years to come. This is a very difficult personal narrative to try to digest and make sense of, but at least XY Chelsea makes for a start on this, even if it cannot approach anything definitive on her singular story.

Link:
XY Chelsea Film Review: Doc Tackles Chelsea Mannings Very In ...

Julian Assange legal team begin ‘big fight’ over extradition …

A struggle over the US request for Julian Assanges extradition will open in court on Thursday morning, a day after the WikiLeaks founder was jailed for just under a year for breaching bail conditions to avoid being extradited to Sweden.

Wednesdays sentence was decried as an outrage by Kristinn Hrafnsson, the editor-in-chief of the whistleblowing website, who said the hearing at Westminster magistrates court to oppose Assanges extradition would be the start of the big fight a process he said would be a question of life and death for Mr Assange.

A judge largely rejected the mitigating factors put forward by lawyers for Assange who took refuge in Ecuadors embassy to London in 2012 to avoid extradition to Sweden over sexual assault allegations, which he has denied and told the 47-year-old it was difficult to envisage a more serious example of the offence.

You remained there for nearly seven years, exploiting your privileged position to flout the law and advertise internationally your disdain for the law of this country, said Judge Deborah Taylor, as she sentenced him at Southwark crown court.

Your actions undoubtedly affected the progress of the Swedish proceedings. Even though you did cooperate initially, it was not for you to decide the nature or extent of your cooperation with the investigations. They could not be effectively progressed, and were discontinued, not least because you remained in the embassy.

Assange, who was arrested last month when Ecuador revoked his political asylum and invited Metropolitan police officers inside the countrys Knightsbridge diplomatic premises, had written a letter in which he expressed regret for his actions but claimed he had been left with no choice.

I apologise unreservedly to those who consider that I have disrespected them by the way I have pursued my case. This is not what I wanted or intended, he said in the letter read out by his lawyer, Mark Summers QC.

I found myself struggling with terrifying circumstances for which neither I nor those from whom I sought advice could work out any remedy. I did what I thought at the time was the best and perhaps the only thing that could be done which I hoped might lead to a legal resolution being reached between Ecuador and Sweden that would protect me from the worst of my fears.

WikiLeaks releases about 470,000 classified military documents concerning American diplomacy and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. It later releases a further tranche of more than 250,000 classified US diplomatic cables.

A Swedish prosecutor issues a European arrest warrant for Assange over sexual assault allegations involving two Swedish women. Assange denies the claims.

A British judge rules that Assange can be extradited to Sweden. Assange fears Sweden will hand him over to US authorities who could prosecute him.

The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention says Assange has been 'arbitrarily detained' and should be able to claim compensation from Britain and Sweden. Britain and Sweden rebuff the non-binding ruling.

Assangeis questionedin a two-day interview over the allegations at the Ecuadorian embassy by Swedish authorities.

Nigel Farage is spotted visiting the Ecuadorian embassy.

Britain refuses Ecuador's request to accord Assange diplomatic status, which would allow him to leave the embassy without being arrested.

Police arrest Assange at the embassy after his asylum was withdrawn. Scotland Yard confirmed that Assange was arrested on behalf of the US after receiving a request for his extradition. Assange has been charged by the US with 'a federal charge of conspiracy to commit computer intrusion for agreeing to break a password to a classified U.S. government computer.'

He is jailed for 50 weeksin the UK for breaching his bail conditions back in 2012. An apology letter from Assange is read out in court, but the judge rules that he had engaged in a deliberate attempt to evade justice.

Assange, wearing a black blazer and shorn of the beard worn when police carried him out of the embassy last month, was told by the judge that his continued residence there had cost 16m of taxpayers money in ensuring that when you did leave, you were brought to justice.

It is essential to the rule of law that nobody is above or beyond the reach of the law, said the judge, who said Assanges written apology was the first recognition that he regretted his actions.

The judge was met with cries of shame on you from Assanges supporters in the gallery when she sentenced him to 50 weeks in prison two weeks short of the maximum under guidelines and directed that time spent on remand since his arrest on 11 April would count against it. Assange turned and raised a clenched fist to supporters as he was led away.

The WikiLeaks founders lawyer had earlier laid out a number of mitigating factors, claiming Assange lived in fear of being rendered from Sweden to the US, where politicians had talked of having him assassinated.

The case of Chelsea Manning and the conditions in which the US military whistleblower was kept was also mentioned, as was the case of individuals who were rendered from Sweden to the US in chains and after being drugged for transatlantic flights.

Summers told the court the Australian had been gripped by fears that his work with WikiLeaks would provoke rendition to Guantanamo Bay or the US, where he could face the death penalty.

As threats rained down on him from America, they overshadowed everything as far as he was concerned, he said. They dominated his thoughts. They were not invented by him, they were gripping him throughout.

He said the fact Assange chose indefinite detention in small rooms at the Ecuadorian embassy, in a state of depression and pain for various medical ailments, rather than spend 12 months in a British jail, showed the extent of his fears.

Speaking on the steps of the court afterwards, Hrafnsson said the sentence was vindictive, adding: It doesnt give us a lot of faith in the UK justice system for the fight ahead.

Drawing a comparison with the sentence of Jack Shepherd, who killed a woman in a speedboat crash and later fled to Georgia, he added: And may I point out, just in comparison, that the so-called speedboat killer got six months for not showing up in court to hear his sentencing for manslaughter.

Shepherd was given credit for his guilty plea, while Assange denied the bail offence and was convicted by a court.

Go here to read the rest:
Julian Assange legal team begin 'big fight' over extradition ...

Julian Assange: WikiLeaks founder resists US … – usatoday.com

A British judge has sentenced WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to 50 weeks in prison for jumping bail in 2012. AP

LONDON WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, appearing before a British court Thursday, said he would notsurrender to a U.S.extradition request as he defended his efforts to steal classified American government records as journalism.

"Notfor doing journalism that'swon many, many awards and affectedmany people," the Australian, 47,said by video link from Belmarsh Prison, a high-security jail in south-east London. Assange looked relaxed, dressed in jeans, a white T-shirt and a dark blazer as he addressed Judge Michael Snow atWestminster Magistrates court.

Assange was not handcuffed during his brief appearance.

Thursday's hearing was the first in a case likely to drag on for months, if not years. U.S. authorities are seeking Assange's extradition because theDepartment of Justicehascharged him with conspiring to break into a Pentagon computer system to reveal a large cache of top-secret files on everything from the war in Afghanistan to diplomatic letters between State Department officials and U.S. ambassadors.

The court on Thursday scheduled a further procedural hearing datefor May 30. Snow said the first substantive action related to the case would likely commenceJune 12.

"The charges relateto one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of the U.S.," said Ben Brandon, a lawyer representing the U.S. government.

Brandon said that the documents Assange downloaded from the Pentagon computer included 90,000 war reports related to Afghanistan, 400,000 from the Iraq War, 800 Guantanamo Bay detainee assessments and 250,000 State Department cables.

About three dozen activists gathered outside the court to protest Assange's potential extradition. They waved banners and heldup photos of Assange with his mouth covered with the American flag. "Civilized people do not extradite publishers of war crimes to war criminal regimes, do they?" one such signread.

"Free Assange" and "No extradition" read others.

"It's about journalistic freedom," Icelandic investigative reporter and WikiLeaks' editor-in-chief Kristinn Hrafnsson said speaking to reporters outside the court.

Some protesters later temporarily blocked a road outside the court.

The hearingcomes one day after a separate British court sentenced Assangeto 50 weeks in a British prison for skipping bail seven years ago and seeking refuge in Ecuador's Embassy in London.Assangeapologized to the court and said he was "struggling with terrifying circumstances" when he decided to hole up in the embassy.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

When he arrived atSouthwark Crown Court in a prison van on Wednesday,Assange raised a clenched fist, a gesture he repeated as he left the court to be returned to prison. He white hair and long beard were trimmed, a marked contrast to Assange's disheveled appearance when he was carried out head-first of Ecuador's embassy on April 11, looking frail and disoriented, by British police.

The U.S. alleges that Assange, who is known for his exceptional computer hacking skills, assisted Chelsea Manning, then a soldier in the U.S. Army, in cracking a password stored on U.S. Department of Defense computers. WikiLeaks subsequently published thousands of classified U.S. military and diplomatic cables and images, including video footage allegedly showing U.S. soldiers killing civilians in Iraq.

Manning served nearly seven years of a 35-year sentence for theft and espionage for helping to deliver classified documents to WikiLeaks. Manning's sentence was later commuted by former President Barack Obama and she was released in 2017.

Assange faces up to five years in a U.S. prison if convicted of conspiracy charges.

Journalist or criminal?Julian Assange notorious for leaks of US secrets

Assange was arrested last month inside the Ecuadorian embassy after the South American countryrevoked his political asylum. Hesought asylum in the embassy in June 2012 to avoid extradition to Sweden, where he was wanted for questioning over rape and sexual assault allegations.At the time, Assange's legal team believed that if he were extradited to Sweden he would subsequently be extradited to the U.S.

Assange denies the rape and sexual assault allegations, whichwere dropped because his residence in Ecuador's embassy stymied the investigation, andbecause the statute of limitations expired. Swedish prosecutors have indicated that they are considering a request from one of Assange's alleged victims to re-open the rape probe.

If that happens, Assange could facea competing new claim for extradition to Sweden.

A supporter of Julian Assange with a poster of the WikiLeaks founder joins other protesters to block a major road in front of Westminster Magistrates Court in London on May 2, 2019.(Photo: Frank Augstein, AP)

Anand Doobay, a London-based lawyer who specializes in extradition law, said that Assange's case isnow further complicated by his 50-week sentence. He said that extradition cases can take "a very long time" and that the decision may ultimately reside with Britain's secretary of state, who will need to be satisfied that Assange would not face the death penalty in the U.S. or be charged with additional crimes.

He said that if Sweden decided to renewits request for extradition based on the rape probe, the secretary of state would also need to decide which request to favor.

"There are significant legal obstacles for the U.S. case," said Daniela Nadj, a professor of law at Queen Mary, University of London, adding that "many questions need to be answered." Among them: If Sweden decidesto renew its extradition claim whether a rape allegation should take precedence over a hacking one.

"Right now Julian will be fighting a battle against despair and despondency," Lauri Love, a British activist who won a U.S.extradition appeal in 2018 for allegedly hacking into the computer systems of the FBI, U.S. Federal Reserve and NASA, told USA TODAY outside the court in London where he showed up to support Assange.

"He'll be facing the same worriesI had," Love, 34, who said he is a friend of Assange's, noted. "Being sent to a place where you have no friends, no family and where you are facing the prospect of facing many people who consider you to be the enemy."

Like what youre reading?: Download the USA TODAY app for more

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2019/05/02/julian-assange-wikileaks-founder-resists-us-extradition-in-court/3638113002/

See the original post:
Julian Assange: WikiLeaks founder resists US ... - usatoday.com

Julian Assange, WikiLeaks boss, refuses to surrender to U …

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrives at court in London, May 1, 2019, to be sentenced for bail violation. He was sentenced to 50 weeks in prison. Getty

London -- WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange faced a court hearing Thursday over the U.S. request to extradite him for allegedly conspiring to hack a Pentagon computer. Assange appeared by video link from prison for the hearing at London's Westminster Magistrates' Court.

According to a reporter for The Guardian newspaper who was in the courtroom, the judge asked Assange whether he would voluntarily surrender to the U.S. extradition request.

"I do not wish to surrender myself for extradition for doing journalism that has won many, many awards and protected many people," Assange replied. The judge adjourned the brief proceeding and said the next hearing, another procedural one, would be held on May 30, with a more substantial hearing set for June 12, according to the Reuters news agency.

A few dozen supporters holding signs reading "Free Assange" and "No extradition" gathered outside the courthouse before the hearing. It's an early stage in what is likely to be a months- or years-long extradition process.

The 47-year-old Australian was sentenced Wednesday to 50 weeks in prison for separate charges on jumping bail in 2012 and holing up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. At the time, he was facing extradition to Sweden for questioning over rape and sexual assault allegations made by two women.

Assange said he took to hiding in the embassy out of fear -- what he called "terrifying circumstances" -- of being sent to the U.S. to face charges related to WikiLeaks' publication of classified U.S. military documents.

WikiLeaks editor-in-chief Kristinn Hrafnsson said Wednesday that the extradition battle was "a question of life and death" for Assange.

Assange was arrested last month after his relationship with his embassy hosts went sour and Ecuador revoked his political asylum.

Lawyers have said Assange will fight extradition to the U.S., where authorities have charged him with conspiring to break into a Pentagon computer system.

The Justice Department's indictment shows that Assange has been charged with computer hacking crimes for trying to illegally access "secret" materials on a U.S. government computer. The charge is officially listed as "conspiracy to commit computer intrusion."

The indictment accuses Assange of trying to access the secret material "with reason to believe that such information so obtained could be used to the injury of the United States and the advantage of any foreign nation."

The charges relate to materials stolen by former Army intelligence analystChelsea Manning, who was convicted in 2013 of leaking classified government and military documents to WikiLeaks. She hadworked as an intelligence analyst in Iraqand was arrested in 2010. Manning is transgender and at the time of her arrest, her name was Bradley.

Manning was jailed again in March for refusing to testify to a grand jury investigating WikiLeaks. U.S. District Judge Claude Hilton ordered Manning to jail for contempt of court after a brief hearing in which Manning confirmed she had no intention of testifying.

The case against Assange in Sweden wasdropped by prosecutors in May 2017-- not because of any conclusion about his guilt or innocence, but because they accepted there wasn't any reasonable chance of prosecuting him as he remained holed-up in London.

Swedish lawyer Elisabeth Massi Fritz, who represents one of the claimants behind the sexual abuse allegations, said shortly after Assange's arrest that it had "understandably come as a shock to my client that what we have been waiting and hoping for since 2012 has now finally happened."

Massi Fritz said in a tweet that she and her team would "do everything we possibly can to get the Swedish police investigation re-opened so that Assange can be extradited to Sweden and prosecuted for rape. No rape victim should have to wait 9 years to see justice be served."

Her client has claimed Assange had sex with her without a condom while she was asleep. In Sweden, having sex with an unconscious, drunk or sleeping person can lead to a rape conviction punishable by up to six years in prison.

Swedish law experts and Assange's own lawyer in Sweden have said, however, that it appears unlikely a new extradition request will be issued by the Scandinavian nation, simply due to the amount of time that has passed.

"I think it would be a very uphill task to reopen the investigation in Sweden," Britain's Guardian quoted former prosecutor Sven-Erik Alhemas telling a Swedish news agency. "Testimony usually weakens with time, and it's now been 10 years."

If Swedish prosecutors do decide to reopen their investigation and issue a new arrest warrant for Assange, it will be down to U.K. Home Secretary Sajid Javid to make the decision on which request to honor -- if any.

More than 70 British legislators have urged Javid to give priority to a case involving rape allegations ahead of the U.S. request, if Sweden reopens the case.

A U.S. official told CBS News justice correspondent Paula Reid that even with an official U.S. request now filed with Britain, extradition is a lengthy process and the WikiLeaks boss was likely hit U.S. soil quickly.

That said, Britain and the U.S. do have a fast-track extradition agreement, so the process should be easier than it would be with many other nations.

Assange would not be expected to enter a plea to the Department of Justice charge unless he loses his extradition case in the U.K. and is brought to a courtroom in the United States.

See the original post:
Julian Assange, WikiLeaks boss, refuses to surrender to U ...