Joe Rogan has released 434 podcasts in the two short years since he last performed in Phoenix.

In an apt illustration of the shows flexibility, this sample starts with Krystyna Hutchinson and Corinne Fisher, the hosts of the Guys We Fucked podcast and ends with presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard. The conversations with Andrew Yang and Elon Musk provided an exponential bump to the formers donor pool and sank Tesla stock by nine percent overnight. This period also saw his already massive audience expand.

It's not inconceivable that professors of the future will study The Joe Rogan Experience and will struggle to explain to their undergrads how a man who had built a public profile by forcing people to drink horse semen on Fear Factor was influencing presidential primaries and major companys stock prices. The podcast offers a rare insight into the everyday demeanor of the worlds most important people and an unhurried platform for them to dive into the topics that concern them.

You (probably) dont have time for 1,000 hours of podcast listening, so heres a selection of the seven best episodes of the past two years in time for Rogan's appearance at Comerica Theatre on Friday, December 6, and Saturday, December 7.

This journalist is a fascinating caricature of modern health fads. Each of his descriptions of the experimental supplements and treatments he tries is packed with so much jargon, they seem feasible. In a moment of self-awareness, he tells Rogan, I do a lot of a guinea pig stuff, and Im not dead yet.

Highlight:At 17:53, when prompted by a description of what he happened to do that day, Greenfield describes the elliptical machine of the future having an outrageous array of benefits.

Whether you think of Alex Jones as a virtuosic performance artist or a belligerent conspiracy theorist, this is him at his Alex Jones-iest. Delivered over four hours of inhuman intensity, he spins an intricate web of alternative world history, touching on (among many other things) the sixth dimension, Planned Parenthoods baby part harvesting operation, and the connection between Nazis and aliens.

Highlight: At 33:54, enjoy what happens after Jones says, The worlds not imitating Blade Runner. Blade Runner is a preparation for whats coming.

A lot of people smoke joints and talk about robots, the AI-induced apocalypse, and flamethrowers but most of them dont do it with Elon Musk.

Highlight: At2:10:27, Musk succumbs to Rogans peer pressuring and smokes weed in front of the world.

For whistleblower Edward Snowden, Rogan made an exception to his policy of having his guests physically in the studio. Rogan is mostly silent for this nearly three-hour conversation.

Highlight: A mesmerizing, 40-minute answer to the question: When did you realize the government went too far?

A healthy portion of episodes are unsophisticated comic relief. Comedian Theo Von fits the bill perfectly.

Highlight: At 50:30, Von discusses his relationship with pornography with a hilarious diversion through an enlightening period in his life where he lived with rich people. Eventually, Von flatters and aptly summarizes Rogans message by saying, I feel like you lead a lot of men in their aspirations to control their beings and be on top of themselves.

Rogan and Neil deGrasse Tyson are a match made in the stars. The podcast host isn't afraid to ask smart people dumb questions. The astrophysicist is an unpretentiously explains otherworldly concepts.

Highlight: At the top of the show, deGrasse Tyson beautifully articulates his love for Vincent van Goghs Starry Night.

Rogan is an outspoken critic of Twitters habit of blocking people, so when he was a little easy on the website's CEO Jack Dorsey a while back, fans freaked out. In response, he arranged for Round Two with an interesting panel of Dorsey, journalist Tim Pool, and lawyer Vijaya Gadde.

Highlight: In this clip, Cook and Gadde address ifTwitter has a bias against conservatives in who and what they ban.

Joe Rogan is scheduled to perform at Comerica Theatre on Friday, December 6, and Saturday, December 7. Tickets are $35 to $95 via Ticketmaster.

See more here:
The Best of the Last Two Years of The Joe Rogan Experience - Phoenix New Times

The Report, Scott Z. Burns film about the CIA Torture Report, makes slow-going research and paper pushing compelling, and it does it while maintaining an astonishingly high level of adherence to the literal truth of what happened to the men imprisoned by the American government at black sites like Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, using dialogue usually taken verbatim from the record. Starring Adam Driver as (real person) Daniel Jones, who worked for California Senator Dianne Feinstein to compile an investigation into the CIAs so-called enhanced interrogation techniques post-9/11, The Report offers a vital condemnation not only of the Bush administrations trigger-happy cronies, but of the Obama administrations ultimately cynical post-partisan fantasies.

Heres a bit of living history: Both administrations supported and enabled the CIA in equipping and promoting war criminals, including CIA intelligence officers like Jose Rodriguez and Gina Haspel. The latter is now the director of the agency and was nominated by the Trump administration and confirmed by the majority Republican senate. The film notes that, to date, not one of the CIAs torturerstheir names still have not been releasedhas been held accountable.

The practice of enhanced interrogationan updated brand of torturewas developed by two barely credentialed psychologists, Bruce Jessen and James Mitchell, who had no experience in interrogation or criminal justice. Mainly, they were overconfident, blood-sucking mediocre white guys looking for vengeance; the CIA, which had already known for decades that torture doesnt even work (besides being immoral and itself criminal) welcomed the psychologists unscientific methods as long as the governments legal team could spin a defense for them. In the film, actor Pun Bandhu plays John Yoo, the UC Berkeley law professor who, as the Deputy Assistant U.S. Attorney General under George Bush, authored the legal memos that provided that defense and became known as the Torture Memos. Fictional Yoo provides the exact justification the real Yoo came up with in the memos: As long as there is no organ failure or death, anything goes, from gouging eyes to pouring acid on a prisoners body.

As Adam Drivers Daniel Jones indignantly yells in explanation to Feinstein (played by a rigid yet convincing Annette Bening), the CIAs torture of prisonerssome of whom the FBI, not the CIA, had already gathered enough intel on to prosecuteensured that no one actually responsible for 9/11 could ever be brought to trial. And on top of that, torture didnt even work, contrary to the narrative of the Oscar-nominated Bin Laden assassination film Zero Dark Thirty. Despite Jones and his teams painstaking research into emails, memos, and even an internal CIA report that confirms the agencys own incompetence and corruption, no one seems to care much within the Obama administration, including the president himselftheres a re-election to be secured and drone strikes to carry out under the CIAs supervision.

Burns, who also penned Steven Soderberghs The Laundromat, originally planned to write and direct a dark comedy film that focused on Jessen and Mitchell. The Laundromat, which Soderbergh admits drew from the narrative style of Adam McKays The Big Short, didnt work precisely because of its overwrought machinations and confused tone (but not, its important to point out, because of its comedy). Im glad Burns opted to take on this story from Jones perspective rather than again borrowing from McKays playbook of unwittingly legitimizing tyrants and liars. It makes for a film that, rather than gawking at the gall of blood-thirsty cynics, soberly examines their horrible methods, revealing powerful alliances that span not only the halls of power but reach across the aisle as well. The Reportunlike McKays dramedies and the practice of tortureis effective, emphasizing humanity as it exposes evil.

The Report offers a vital condemnation not only of the Bush Administrations trigger-happy cronies, but of the Obama administrations ultimately cynical post-partisan fantasies.

Jones is a regular guy who, not unlike Jessen and Mitchell, wants to beat the bad guys. At the start of the film, he meets with Obamas chief of staff Denis McDonough, who encourages to him get experience in the FBI or on the Hill before trying to get a job with the executive branch. Jones, a bit of a boy scout, eventually finds himself under the direction of Feinstein, whom we later learn has been charged with creating the report only because Obama refuses to task his own branch with the investigation, not wanting to ruin his chances at post-partisan governmental bliss. Over the course of the investigation, Jones develops much of the integrity that evades Obama and his people. Jonesalong with a team that the film compresses to six and then three people, but was actually around 20refuses to turn away from the CIAs abuses. He fights to have the truth revealed without compromise, which takes the form of gratuitous redactions by the CIA which are sanctioned by Obama via McDonough.

The film ends up emphasizing the limits of Jones boy scout behavior, even though it is in service a righteous cause. Jones meets with a New York Times National Security reporter and considers pulling an Edward Snowden by leaking the full 6,000-page report to the press. Feinstein has already told Jones that she believes Snowden is a traitorwhistleblowers dont figure into her ideas of justice. Jones is not so sure, and during their meeting, the Times reporter reveals the extent of Obamas complicity in suppressing the investigation. This information isnt enough to sway Joneshe ultimately believes he has to take the legal, governmental recourse and doesnt leak the document. A 582-page summary is released by Congress instead (a recent New York Times story revealed how close even the summary was to being suppressed). None of the real names of those directly accountable are in it, and no onemuch like with Obamas big bank bailoutgoes to jail.

Ultimately, liberal ideologya belief in incremental reform and justice through institutions rather than peopleconvinces Jones that he shouldnt blow the whistle. But, to this day, Jones is enraged at the continued lack of accountability in the wake of the report. The summary was released to the public but what resulted was mostly strategically crafted speeches by statesmen like the late Republican senator John McCain and handwringing by concerned citizens; Obama, for his part, admitted, in an absurd turn of phrase, that we tortured some folks. CIA agents both complicit and directly involved in torturing detainees were not simply given a pass but promoted within the agency.

The liberalism of Obamas government and Feinsteins office did not rock the boat by design. If you watch closely, youll see that The Report is not a triumphant film, which is exactly why it has fallen under the radar. The movie not only testifies to the importance of exposing ugly truths, but suggests that self-sacrifice and rebellion may be required for justice to ever be served. Obama, who recently cautioned millennials against leftist revolution, is still preaching his credo of rule-following moderation. If he had gotten his way before, most media outlets would still be reporting that our government had delivered us to safety by way of torture. We would do well to learn from the former presidents example by rejecting it.

See the article here:
Amazon's 'The Report' Condemns Not Only Bush but Obama for Turning a Blind Eye to Torture - The Daily Beast

Eric Schoen

This too is Yonkers, by Eric W. Schoen

Whistleblower (also written as whistle-blower or whistle blower) is a personwho exposes any kind of information or activity that is deemed illegal,unethical, or not correct within an organization that is either private orpublic. Because of this, a number of laws exist to protect whistleblowers.Definition courtesy of WikiPedia.

We keep hearing that word and think that itis someone who has supernatural powers and information no one else knows. Weget the impression that the person is exposing information at such a high levelthat he or she needs Secret Service protection 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,365 days a year.

Well friends, I am hear to tell you that youtoo could become a whistleblower. It can be done completely anonymously fromthe comfort of your home. All you need is a computer, a phone, or a piece ofpaper and a stamp. Before we get into the details let me tell you about mywhistleblower experiences.

It happened over 30 years ago which proveswhistleblowing in not a new phenomena. All the participants in the scheme arelong gone from Yonkers. I knew of an agency that was getting funding for jobtraining and using the money to pay salaries and not doing any type of crediblejob training.

They got the money through a quid pro quo (afavor or advantage granted or expected in return for something). The agency andits supporters backed a political candidate and in return that candidate whowas chairperson of the organization with the money gave the agency what youwould call a no show contract. I was in a position to audit the agencyreceiving funds. You cant audit an agency that does no work. In this case theminimal work the agency was doing was limited to a specific group of people andnot open to the general public as it was supposed to be.

I started by calling the State InspectorGeneral of the agency where the money was coming from. It was federal money being channeled through thestate. I started at the state level but my whistleblower complaint quickly gotelevated to the federal level. I wanted to remain anonymous and they agreed toit. They knew I had the goods.

We chatted on the phone several times andagreed to meet in the parking lot of the old Parkside Diner on South Broadway.The agent, investigator whatever he was called told me the color and type ofhis car and I gave him my car details and where to meet me in the lot. I gavehim the information I had, documents that proved my claim, and we chatted in mycar for about an hour.

Fortunately my car did not blow up. Inretrospect the investigator should have at least brought me coffee andbreakfast.

Two other quick whistleblower stories. Iworked in a building where people were constantly getting sick from therecirculated air. I filed an anonymous complaint with the Federal EnvironmentalProtection Agency and they came out to test the air.

Another time I anonymously called the YonkersFire Department as the office I worked in had moved filing cabinets aroundmaking it unsafe to reach the exits in case of an emergency. Our wonderful YonkersFire Department came out (mind you within minutes after I made the call) andsaw that the filing cabinets were in an unsafe position blocking exits andpaths to the exits. They made the office move the filing cabinets so that theywere not a fire hazard.

Yes friends, if I can be a whistleblower youcan too. Most times you can remain anonymous. Visit whistleblowers.org for excellent information. That website will help you Know YourRights.

Whistleblowing takes preparation. Deciding which law youshould report under is in many ways the single most important decisionaffecting the outcome of a case. Give as much information as possible (i.e.,names of alleged offenders, victims, witnesses, etc., and leads on anyapplicable data, documentation or other evidence).

Lets start at the top. Want to file a complaint about somethingthe President did? Or one of his Advisors or Members of his Cabinet? It alldepend on the specific fraud committed. oversight.gov lets you report waste,Disclose wrongdoing about a federal government agency, program, contract orgrant. Most federal agencies have Inspector Generals that accept whistleblowercomplaints.

Senators or Congressman? The House and Senate Committee on Ethics(ethics.senate.govor

ethics.house.gov)can Investigate alleged violations of the Code of Official Conduct or of anyapplicable rules, laws, or regulations governing the performance of officialduties or the discharge of official responsibilities and Committeerules . Then if need be Report to appropriatefederal or state authorities substantial evidence of a violation of any lawapplicable to the performance of official duties that may have been disclosedin a Committee investigation.

State officials? Office of the New York State Comptroller has a confidential, toll free hotline.Call 1-888-672-4555 weekdays, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. to make youranonymous complaint. ag.ny.gov puts you in touch with the Attorney Generalsoffice.The Attorney General serves all New Yorkers in numerousmatters affecting their daily lives. Specifically, the statutory and common lawpowers to protect consumers and investors, charitable donors, the public healthand environment, civil rights, and the rights of wage-earners and businessesacross the State.

Authority also includesthe activities and investigations of the State Organized Crime Task Force andMedicaid Fraud Control Unit.

In Westchester County, theBoard of Ethics handles ethics complaints. According to the County Website,there is no phone number but they list an attorney as contact, Asst. CountyAttorney David Polizzi dppd@westchestergov.com .

Yonkers has an Office ofthe Inspector General, Brendan McGrath. Email Brendan.McGrath@yonkersny.gov , Call 914-377-6107 or Fax:914-377-6990. They also have a link on theirpage on the Yonkers website where you can make an anonymous complaint.

When in doubt you can also visit FBI.gov/tips or contact the NewYork FBI office

26 Federal Plaza, 23rd Floor New York, NY10278-0004 newyork.fbi.gov

(212) 384-1000 Regional corruption hotline.

Tips about criminal activity taking place in Yonkers? Text tip411and when prompted enter YPD. The Yonkers Police Internal Affairs Division has a24 hour a day hotline, 914-377-7331. For the Fire Department contact (914)377-7526 Monday through Friday. Obviously for a Police or Fire or MedicalEmergency DIAL 911.

Another important web address. For Internet complaints visit ic3.gov . Thats the Federal Internet CrimeBureau.

So there you have it. You, Too Can Be the next Edward Snowden.

Reach Eric Schoen at thistooisyonkers@aol.com. Follow him onTwitter @ericyonkers. Listen to Eric Schoen and Dan Murphy on the WestchesterRising Radio Show Thursdays from 10-11 a.m. On WVOX 1460 AM, go to WVOX.comand click the arrow to listen to the live stream or download the WVOX app fromthe App Store free of charge

The rest is here:
You, Too Can Be a Whistleblower - Yonkers Times

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Edward Snowden stole very sensitive classified information from the National Security Agency [NSA] while working for contractor Booz Allen Hamilton in Hawaii. He fled the country and divulged national security secrets. Here is why it did not have to happen.

There are specific actions which Booz Allen Hamilton and NSA could have taken to intercept Edward Snowden before he boarded an international flight at Honolulu International Airport. We are not going to look at why Snowden did what he did. Much has already been written about that. Rather we are going to consider what could have been done to prevent the Illegal disclosure.

In 2013, Edward Snowden and his thumb drive full of classified NSA documents boarded a plane and changed the world forever.

I first learned of this matter from an article published in the Honolulu Star-Advertiser on June 9, 2013 entitled, Hawaii man was source of National Security Agency leaks. He had left the country nearly three weeks earlier.

On June 24, 2013, South China Morning Post [SCMP] published an article entitled, Snowden sought Booz Allen job to gather evidence on NSA surveillance.

The following are excerpts from that SCMP article based on Snowdens admissions while he was in Hong Kong:

Fugitive whistle-blower reveals for first time he took job at US government contractor with the sole aim of collecting proof of spying activities

My position with Booz Allen Hamilton granted me access to lists of machines all over the world the NSA hacked, he told the Post on June 12. That is why I accepted that position about three months ago.

During a live global online chat last week, Snowden also stated he took pay cuts in the course of pursuing specific work. He said: Booz was not the most Ive been paid.

He spent the time collecting a cache of classified documents as a computer systems administrator at Booz Allen Hamilton.

Asked if he specifically went to Booz Allen Hamilton to gather evidence of surveillance, he replied: Correct on Booz.

The documents he divulged to the Post were obtained at Booz Allen Hamilton in April, he said.

Two days after Snowden broke cover in Hong Kong as the source of the NSA leaks, Booz Allen Hamilton sacked him.

An email request was sent three times over a five-day period to Booz Allen Hamilton Media Relations at their head office in McLean, Virginia. Voice mails were also left for two persons there. A third person was reached on his cellphone but said that he was on medical leave and could not assist.

Here is a copy of the request and the questions which were posed in a conscientious effort to allow the company to give their side of the issue:

Booz Allen Hamilton

Media Inquiries

My name is David Ware. I am a journalist with an online publication called NOQ Report.

https://noqreport.com/author/david-ware

I am researching an article about why Edward Snowden was not intercepted before he could leave the United States with classified information while he was employed by Booz Allen Hamilton in Hawaii. I want to give you the opportunity to respond to the following questions before publication.

1 Do you confirm that Edward Snowden was employed by Booz Allen Hamilton in May-June 2013?

2 If so, at which NSA facility was he assigned and what was his official capacity there?

3 Did Snowden take leave in May 2013 and, if so, what was his stated purpose and destination?

4 What were the dates of his leave and on what date did you become concerned as to his whereabouts?

5 What were your actions and the dates to try to locate him?

6 What and when were your communications and coordination with NSA about Snowdens absence?

7 Did you learn that classified information was compromised and that Snowden could potentially have it in his possession, and if so, when and how did you become aware of that?

8 Did you know the nature of the medium on which that classified information was taken out of the NSA facility, and, if so, what medium was it?

9 Specifically, were there reasons to suspect that Snowden might have the classified information on a thumb drive in his possession?

10 Were any actions taken by Booz Allen Hamilton to intercept Edward Snowden and prevent him from divulging the classified information, and, if so, what and when were those actions?

11 If you are aware of NSA actions to intercept Snowden and the classified information, could you please describe those actions and their dates?

12 Did Booz Allen Hamilton or NSA have reason to believe that Edward Snowden may have committed a crime, and, if so, on what date did you become aware of that and what were your relevant actions and dates?

13 If you are unaware of NSA actions or are unable to discuss what you do know, could you please provide a name and contact at NSA who can do so?

14 Are there any other comments that you wish to provide about the issue of Edward Snowden?

This article will consider whether specific timely action could potentially have stopped Edward Snowden from boarding a flight at Honolulu International Airport with classified information in his possession. Your responses to these questions and additional comments will be included verbatim and in their entirety without being edited.

This story will be published on or after 11/23/2019 unless you request more time to supply the answers.

Mahalo,

David Ware

No response from Booz Allen Hamilton whatsoever was received.

Per Wikipedia:

On March 15, 2013 three days after what he later called his breaking point of seeing the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, directly lie under oath to Congress Snowden quit his job at Dell.

At the time of his departure from the U.S. in May 2013, he had been employed for 15 months inside the NSAs Hawaii regional operations center, which focuses on the electronic monitoring of China and North Korea, the last three of which were with consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton.

That being the case, it is absolutely incomprehensible that Booz Allen Hamilton hired him immediately and he began working for them at NSA. There could not have been an independent background security investigation conducted by Booz Allen Hamilton under those circumstances. As Snowden himself has admitted, he took the position specifically to obtain and divulge sensitive classified NSA data.

So, our first concern is that Booz Allen Hamilton did not apparently vet Snowden as to why he left Dell. NSA allowed him to change contractors and continue working at their super-secret facility in Kunia, Hawaii.

Snowden had been employed for no more than 6 weeks by this company, so he would not have had a significant amount of sick leave or annual leave accrued by May 1st. Yet he was absent until he departed the country on May 20th. He and his girlfriend moved out of their rented house in nearby Kunia at that time. It would be important to know how much leave he was authorized and whether any actions were taken by Booz Allen Hamilton or by NSA to locate him.

Did NSA realize that classified information had been compromised before Snowden divulged it publicly from outside the United States? If not, why not? If so, what actions were taken to intercept him and to recover / secure the data?

If the breach was known, did Booz Allen Hamilton or NSA suspect that Snowden might have it in his possession on a thumb drive?

Most importantly, was there reason to believe that Snowden may have committed a crime? If so, what action was taken to apprehend him?

The National Crime Information Center (NCIC) is a computerized index of missing persons and criminal information and is designed for the rapid exchange of information between criminal justice agencies. Users access the NCIC computer located at FBI headquarters through regional or State computer systems or with direct tie-ins to the NCIC computer. The data is stored in 12 files: article, boat, Canadian warrant, gun, interstate identification index, license plate, missing person, securities, U.S. Secret Service Protective, unidentified person, vehicle, and wanted person.

If a federal arrest warrant had been issued on Edward Snowden and entered into NCIC, he would have been identified and apprehended by U.S. Customs and Border Protection at the boarding gate of any international flight from Honolulu or other city. A warrantless outbound border search could have been conducted and the stolen data would have been recovered and prevented from leaving the United States in his possession. A thumb drive or other electronic media could have been detained. CBP would have turned him over to the agency holding the warrant.

But, even if there was not enough for NSA to obtain an arrest warrant, NCIC is not the only way CBP could have been alerted. If CBP had known before Snowden left the USA, a nationwide alert could have been entered and he would still have been identified prior to boarding an international flight. He would have been questioned at the gate and a warrantless border search would still have found any stolen classified information in his possession.

So, there you have it. The problem is that CBP was not alerted about Snowden before he left the country.

If Booz Allen Hamilton and/or NSA did not suspect Edward Snowden of stealing sensitive classified information before he divulged it from Hong Kong, then there are serious deficiencies in the security posture of both.

If they did know and suspected Snowden, they did not take appropriate timely action to notify CBP before he could get out of the country.

Frankly, it is hard to believe that an agency as reputable as NSA and a contractor with such a long positive track record as Booz Allen Hamilton did not have reason to believe that Snowden was the culprit sooner rather than later.

Therefore, the only logical conclusion is that they failed to coordinate with CBP to stop him from taking the compromised classified information abroad and divulging it there.

This did not have to become the notorious international incident that it is today. Snowden could have had his day in court and faced justice here in the United States instead of lurking in Moscow.

The author of this article is a retired United States government employee with 42 years combined active duty military and civilian service who was the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Representative at the Hawaii High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area [HIDTA] and collocated Hawaii State Fusion Center at the time of the Snowden incident.

I became aware of this matter strictly through open sources after Snowden had already flown from Honolulu to Hong Kong. We cannot redo the past. Whats done is done and cannot be undone.

For the record, I have worked with Booz Allen Hamilton over the years and still have a very positive impression of the overall contribution they make to our national security as a contractor with various government agencies. I also respect the publicly misunderstood role of NSA. I was aware of their existence long before the Snowden affair.

For six and a half years now, I have wished that Booz Allen Hamilton or NSA would have made a timely notification to CBP about Snowden. But, they didnt. Life goes on.

The merger of Customs inspections with Immigration inspections into DHS/CBP on March 1, 2003 was a game-changer that merits a thorough analysis in an article all its own.

The relevance in this context is that the mission of the late, great U.S. Customs Service [USCS] was preempted and usurped by the focus on non-U.S. citizens. Customs, which was established in 1789, the same year the U.S. Constitution was ratified, was a Treasury Department agency tasked with protecting and collecting the revenue along with preventing the smuggling of contraband across our borders whether by U.S. citizens or otherwise.

I hope this assessment of what went wrong in the Snowden affair will:

In fairness, despite the passing of the deadline without response, if Booz Allen Hamilton wishes to provide answers to the questions which were posed to them, they will be duly considered and we will do a follow-up article. NSA is also welcome and invited to tell us your side of the story.

As for Edward Snowden, just hold that thought and tell it to the judge and jury. Besides, we dont speak Russian.

We are currently forming the American Conservative Movement. If you are interested in learning more, we will be sending out information in a few weeks.

Original post:
Conspiracy Theory4 days ago Why the Snowden incident didn't have to happen EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - NOQ Report