GitHub gathers friends for a security code cleanse to scrub that software up to spec – The Register

GitHub, Microsoft's cloud version control service and gripe forum, has joined with a handful of like-minded partners to form GitHub Security Lab (GSL) to better find bugs in open source software.

Consisting of GitHub security researchers, third-party code maintainers and interested parties from partner companies, GSL aspires to provide a bit more organization to the daunting task of securing open source code.

In a phone interview with The Register, Jamie Cool, VP of product security at GitHub, said the overall theme of GitHub's security announcements involves focusing the power of community.

"We recognize this is a problem that no one company can solve, including GitHub," he said. "But it's incredibly important, which is why we're investing so much in it."

The core of the Security Lab is an internal GitHub security team. The partner companies, said Cool, all share a common interest in better software.

"We basically wanted to combine the energy these companies have to secure open source software," he said, explaining that they all have something tangible to contribute, such as expertise, research or tools.

For example, Google, he said, is bringing software fuzzing tools, while Trail of Bits, a security consultancy, has committed to devoting time to open source bug hunting when not otherwise engaged.

Initially, GSL intends to lead by example, having already driven the creation of more than 100 CVEs detailing flaws that need fixing. The hope is other companies signed on as partners will participate by contributing security research findings to the open source community.

These partners include: F5, Google, HackerOne, IOActive, JP Morgan, LinkedIn, Microsoft, Mozilla, NCC Group, Oracle, Trail of Bits, Uber, and VMWare.

GSL brings with it two practical tools: CodeQL, a language for querying databases generated from source code to find variations of vulnerable code patterns, and the GitHub Advisories Database, a public data set of security advisories from GitHub and accompanying remediation info.

Back in September, GitHub bought software analysis biz Semmle for its LGTM (Looks Good To Me) vulnerability query platform. CodeQL, used to search data from LGTM, represents the reconsidered branding for that tool.

With CodeQL now open to the public, any developer able to recognize a vulnerable code pattern can search for variations on that theme in source files converted to a CodeQL database. And Mozilla is offering an incentive for doing so: Firefox's maker, a GSL partner and admitted user of Semmle's tech, has just expanded its bug bounty program to accept static analysis queries crafted in CodeQL or as Clang-based checkers.

Cool said the hope is that CodeQL will not only help people find vulnerabilities but also avoid re-implementing those same flawed patterns.

In a blog post on Thursday, Cool explained the need to make security information easier to find and more comprehensive.

"Forty per cent of new vulnerabilities in open source dont have a CVE identifier when theyre announced, meaning theyre not included in any public database," Cool said. "Seventy per cent of critical vulnerabilities remain unpatched 30 days after developers have been notified."

To help address that gap, GitHub has a service called Security Advisories, just promoted from beta to general availability, that lets developers draft advisories, coordinate private discussion in the applicable project, collaborate on a fix in a temporary private project fork, and then publish the advisory, with a CVE number bestowed by GitHub, alongside patched code.

Along similar lines, Github's automated security update scheme, by which auto-detected vulnerabilities elicit a pull request fix, has graduated to general availability.

Also, Token scanning, introduced last fall in public beta, has attracted still more partners: GoCardless, HashiCorp, Postman, and Tencent. The service, which helps developers avoid publishing sensitive tokens in git commits, previously marked the participation of Alibaba Cloud, Atlassian, AWS, Azure, Discord, Dropbox, Google Cloud, Mailgun, npm, Proctorio, Pulumi, Slack, Stripe, and Twilio.

Sponsored: Technical Overview: Exasol Peek Under the Hood

See more here:
GitHub gathers friends for a security code cleanse to scrub that software up to spec - The Register

GitHub Universe 2019: GitHub for mobile, GitHub Archive Program and more announced amid protests against GitHubs ICE contract – Packt Hub

Yesterday, GitHub commenced its popular product conference GitHub Universe 2019 in San Francisco. The two-day annual conference celebrates the contribution of GitHubs 40+ million developers and their contributions to the open source community. Day 1 of the conference had many interesting announcements like GitHub for mobile, GitHub Archive Program, and more.

Lets look at some of the major announcements at the GitHub Universe 2019 conference.

Github for mobile is a beta app that aims to give users the flexibility to work and interact with the team, anywhere they want. This will enable users to share feedback on a design discussion or review codes in a non-complex development environment. This native app will adapt to any screen size and will also work in dark mode based on the device preference. Currently available only on iOS, the GitHub team has said that it will soon come up with the Android version of it.

Our world is powered by open source software. Its a hidden cornerstone of our civilization and the shared heritage of all humanity. The mission of the GitHub Archive Program is to preserve it for generations to come, states the official GitHub blog.

GitHub has partnered with the Stanford Libraries, the Long Now Foundation, the Internet Archive, the Software Heritage Foundation, Piql, Microsoft Research, and the Bodleian Library to preserve all the available open source code in the world. It will safeguard all the data by storing multiple copies across various data formats and locations. This includes a very-long-term archive called the GitHub Arctic Code Vault which is designed to last at least 1,000 years.

Read More: GitHub Satellite 2019 focuses on community, security, and enterprise

Last year, at the GitHub Universe conference, GitHub Actions was announced in beta. This year, GitHub has made it generally available to all the users. In the past year, GitHub Actions has received contributions from the developers of AWS, Google, and others. Actions has now developed as a new standard for building and sharing automation for software development, including a CI/CD solution and native package management.GitHub has also announced the free use of self-hosted runners and artifact caching.

In May this year, GitHub had announced the beta version of the GitHub Package Registry as its new package management service. Later in September, after gathering community feedback, GitHub announced that the service has proxy support for the primary npm registry.

Since its launch, GitHub Package has received over 30,000 unique packages that served the needs of over 10,000 organizations. Now, at the GitHub Universe 2019, the GitHub team has announced the general availability of GitHub Packages and also informed that they have added support for using the GitHub Actions token.

These were some of the major announcements at day 1 of the GitHub Universe 2019 conference, head over to GitHubs blog for more details of the event.

Major product announcements aside, one thing that garnered a lot of attention at the GitHub Universe conference was the protest conducted by the GitHub workers along with the Tech Workers Coalition to oppose GitHubs $200,000 contract with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Many high-profile speakers have dropped out of the GitHub Universe 2019 conference and at least five GitHub employees have resigned from GitHub due to its support for ICE.

Read More: Largest women in tech conference, Grace Hopper Celebration, renounces Palantir as a sponsor due to concerns over its work with the ICE

Yesterday at the event, the protesting tech workers brought a giant cage to symbolize how ICE uses them to detain migrant children.

Tech workers around the world have extended their support to the protest against GitHub.

GitHub along with Weights & Biases introduced CodeSearchNet challenge evaluation and CodeSearchNet Corpus

GitHub acquires Semmle to secure open-source supply chain; attains CVE Numbering Authority status

GitHub Package Registry gets proxy support for the npm registry

GitHub updates to Rails 6.0 with an incremental approach

GitHub now supports two-factor authentication with security keys using the WebAuthn API

Original post:
GitHub Universe 2019: GitHub for mobile, GitHub Archive Program and more announced amid protests against GitHubs ICE contract - Packt Hub

‘Nu’? A Software Program That Reads Yiddish – New England Public Radio

New software for searching words in digitized Yiddish books many originally written in the 19th and early 20th centuries is about to be unveiled.

The search tool will be available via the Yiddish Book Center in Amherst, Massachusetts. Its digital library includes more than 10,000 books in Yiddish but the current ability to search them is limited.

Amber Clooney, the center's digital librarian, recently demonstrated just how limited the current search software is. She pulled up a website, and a Yiddish keyboard appeared on the screen. She typed in "tsig" the Yiddish word for goat.

Because it can search only titles and authors, the software delivered just three references.

Then Clooney pulled up a different screen that showed a beta version of the new search software.

"On the [new] site, we can search anywhere in the text of a book," she said. "It's great."

Within just a few seconds, about 6,000 references came up.

A decade in development

The search software is called Jochre, for Java Optical Character Recognition. To date, it's the most comprehensive Yiddish word search tool available, according to several computer scientists and scholars.

The Yiddish Book Center, which is a repository for more than a million hard copy books in Yiddish, expects to have Jochre up and running on its site by the end of the year.

Aaron Lanksy founded the Yiddish Book Center in 1980. He once thought writing optical character recognition (OCR) for Yiddish was a pipe dream.

"It was going to be inordinately complicated, and cost $10 million, minimum," Lansky said. "We figured this was never going to happen."

And it happened by chance.

An email arrived 10 years ago, out of the blue, Lansky said, from a benevolent software engineer in France named Assaf Urieli.

Lansky said Urieli wrote that he was a computational linguist living in the French Pyrenees, and had just invented Yiddish OCR. And Urieli wanted to donate it to the Yiddish Book Center so its books could be searchable.

Urieli remembered telling Lanksy he wanted to give him a demo.

"So we can talk about it, so we can see if we can maybe do a project together," Urieli said, speaking from France.

Both Lansky and Urieli are on a mission to make Jochre and Yiddish available to the world a world they say doesn't know much about how many millions of people once spoke the 1,000-year-old language.

Yiddish was almost erased by Stalin and Hitler, then almost lost when many Jews left Europe after World War II for the U.S., and when Israel didnt make Yiddish its national language.

Urieli's work began with an interest in his own family history. He grew up between South Africa, Ohio and Israel, and knew almost nothing about Yiddish until he was a young adult. He was already multilingual when he learned his great-grandparents and generations before them spoke Yiddish. He decided to learn the language and research his family.

Thats how Urieli discovered the Yiddish Book Center's digital library.

"Among other things, I was reading about the town where my grandmother was born in Lithuania, and I was thinking how nice it would be if I could actually perform a search among older books to find all of the references to this town," Urieli said. "And I thought: well, why not write the software?"

Urieli figured it would take the summer. But after three months, he said he hadn't made much progress.

"But I suppose I couldn't abandon it, either," he said. "The idea was too fascinating."

OCR is complex

In Yiddish, many of the documents are old and have stray marks. Software can easily misread what it thinks are characters. Jochre had to be taught and retaught otherwise.

Once Urieli got past some common code challenges, the Yiddish Book Center and other libraries began to build a dictionary of words and proper names.

Urieli has not been the only one trying to build a Yiddish OCR. In roughly the same time frame, computer scientist Raphael Finkel at the University of Kentucky had been developing his own version, one that requires more human editing than Jochre.

Finkel has already used Urielis program and he's impressed.

"It is searchable in a very fast way, which is nice," Finkel said. "It makes about the same rate of OCR mistake as mine does. It's the nature of the problem mistakes in understanding the text."

An example of how a simple Yiddish phrase, Finkel said, can be misunderstood is in the phrase, "This bothers me."

In different Yiddish dialects, the sound and letters change. In the word for "me," the first Yiddish letter is the same, but the last letters are completely different to the eye and ear, as well as to an OCR program.

While no software is perfect, Finkel said, Jochre is "a great advance."

The expectation is that scholars, cultural anthropologists, families and others can dig in deeper to Yiddish history and language. Digital libraries and researchers may be able to use the software on their own sites, with a little setup on their end to make it possible.

Urieli is an enthusiast of open source software.

"You do something not because you want to get rich off of it," he said, "but because it's something that you're passionate about, and you want to share with the world."

Jochre is designed to get smarter over time through use and corrections.

The Yiddish Book Center reports they're getting about five or six corrections a day from Yiddish speakers living around the world.

Original post:
'Nu'? A Software Program That Reads Yiddish - New England Public Radio

Geek of the Week: If theres roadwork ahead, Kurt Stiles uses 3D modeling and more to drive project – GeekWire

Kurt Stiles and his team at the Washington State Department of Transportation often take to the air to better illustrate the stories theyre telling on the ground. (Photo courtesy of Kurt Stiles)

If a new roadway or bridge or other infrastructure element in Washington state looks and drives exactly like youd hoped it would, perhaps Kurt Stiles and his team at the Washington State Department of Transportation are to thank.

Stiles and the Visual Engineering Resource Group (VERG) are the visual media professionals who use a variety of tools, such as aerial photography, 3D modeling and animation, to communicate the stages of all types of projects.

Our latest Geek of the Week spent 10 years in the military before going to school for civil engineering. He was helping to raise three boys and working full time at WSDOT when he discovered the world of 3D modeling and visualization in 1998. Today he leads the group he helped develop at the agency in 2008.

The tech for 3D modeling has grown tremendously. There is no excuse now we have tremendous tools to visually communicate infrastructure change, Stiles said. Our productions can tell any story, to any audience and at any scale. Decision making processes have improved, saving time and money. All stakeholders and the public alike have a deeper understanding which translates to improved consent.

Stiles points to a variety of projects which VERG has had a hand in, whether its photography work showing everything from highway overpasses to rest areas to ferry terminals, or drone footage of a mudslide. Video production and animation is especially useful to show renderings of completed projects, such as this video-game-like fly-by of Interstate-90 near Snoqualmie Pass:

Stiles is particularly proud of the teams 3D modeling work for whats called a diverging diamond interchange, a project being implemented for the first time in Washington, in Lacey.

This retrofitted interchange will handle much more daily traffic volume and do so in a much safer way, Stiles said. Moreover, the new interchange will provide improved, safer pedestrian and bike travel, too much better than what was there originally. This type of interchange design is very progressive and will be a hallmark project for other interchange retrofits to follow in Washington.

Modeling cars and trucks on conventional roadways is all fine and good, but what is VERG going to do when we get the flying vehicles were all waiting for?

That will be fun! Im sure we can animate all sorts of flying objects, Stiles said. But we will have to make sure there is a solid tax-structure to handle all those landing pads that are going to have to be built everyone will want one! Perhaps a new tax on leather flying jackets and goggles? Im sure that will work.

Learn more about this weeks Geek of the Week, Kurt Stiles:

What do you do, and why do you do it? I built and lead a visual communication content development group that is centered in 3D computer modeling, video production and commercial photography. We provide strategic communication content for infrastructure decision makers. They use it so they can get understanding, consent, funding, etc. from their stakeholders and constituents when building civil projects.

Whats the single most important thing people should know about your field? Civil infrastructure change needs to be first and foremost communicated correctly so all parties understand what the change is and why it has to happen. Twentieth-century problems of the built-environment cannot be fixed with 20th century technology. By using 3D modeling and other tools, tremendous insight can be gained in a precognitive way. A future view can be displayed showing the pros and cons, decisions can be made quicker and with increased understanding. Time and money is saved while the project moves forward in an accelerated way.

Where do you find your inspiration? Watching an underdog, any underdog, work hard, work long and then beat the ass off some self-righteous, privileged SOB.

Whats the one piece of technology you couldnt live without, and why? Blender. Open source software that you can make a living with. You can model anything the built environment needs. Remember to give back though with donations keep Blender open source!

Whats your workspace like, and why does it work for you? VERG works in an office like a lot of Geeks. We also have a lot of outside field work, too video shoots, helicopter photography, flying drones, etc. Its never dull in VERG.

Your best tip or trick for managing everyday work and life. (Help us out, we need it.) Setting and managing production expectations. Lead the conversation with your clients based upon their spoken need and youll never go wrong.

Mac, Windows or Linux? Windows.

Kirk, Picard, or Janeway? Picard.

Transporter, Time Machine or Cloak of Invisibility? Time machine. I wanna go back so I can get it right the second time.

If someone gave me $1 million to launch a startup, I would Run to the hills with the dough? No, Id do it, but its gotta be MY startup.

I once waited in line for A warm Coke in the Philippines, which I drank with fevered intent.

Your role models: Napoleon Bonaparte: Capability is worthless without opportunity.Gen. George Patton: Lead me, follow me, or get the hell outta the wayTony Robbins: There are only two options: make progress or make solutions

Greatest game in history: Chess.

Best gadget ever: Theyre all great, but not without WD-40.

First computer: Compaq Portable.

Current phone: Android S7 or Motorola DynaTAC CellStar, I cant remember which.

Favorite app: WAYZ.

Favorite cause: Dog rescues for any dog.

Most important technology of 2019: Gaming engines.

Most important technology of 2021: Gaming engines.

Final words of advice for your fellow geeks: Just do it. Suck it up, stand for something and take the risk. Feel free to draw a line in the sand, just be able to defend it. Take ownership no one else will and youll impress the hell out of people for it.

Website: Visual Engineering Resource Group

LinkedIn: Kurt Stiles

Read more:
Geek of the Week: If theres roadwork ahead, Kurt Stiles uses 3D modeling and more to drive project - GeekWire

The son of Julian Assanges judge is linked to an anti-data leak company created by the UK intelligence establishment – Daily Maverick

An aerial view of the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) building in Cheltenham, western England. GCHQ is the UKs major surveillance agency. The anti-data leak company Darktrace was founded by GCHQ officials in 2013. (Photo: GCHQ)

The son of Lady Emma Arbuthnot, the Westminster chief magistrate overseeing the extradition proceedings of Julian Assange, is the vice-president and cyber-security adviser of a firm heavily invested in a company founded by GCHQ and MI5 which seeks to stop data leaks, it can be revealed.

Alexander Arbuthnots employer, the private equity firm Vitruvian Partners, has a multimillion-pound investment in Darktrace, a cyber-security company which is also staffed by officials recruited directly from the US National Security Agency (NSA) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

These intelligence agencies are behind the US governments prosecution of Julian Assange for publishing secret documents. Darktrace has also had access to two former UK prime ministers and former US President Barack Obama.

The revelations raise further concerns about potential conflicts of interests and appearance of bias concerning Lady Arbuthnot and the ties of her family members to the UK and US military and intelligence establishments. Lady Arbuthnots husband is Lord James Arbuthnot, a former UK defence minister who has extensive links to the UK military community.

As far as is known, Lady Arbuthnot has failed to disclose any potential conflicts of interest in her role overseeing Assanges case. However, UK legal guidance states that any conflict of interest in a litigious situation must be declared.

Her son, Alexander Arbuthnot, a graduate of Britains elite school Eton, joined Vitruvian Partners as vice-president in December 2018 and is likely to be managing the firms Darktrace account. Vitruvian, which has a portfolio of over 4-billion, made its first investment in Darktrace in April 2018, leading a consortium of firms committing 50-million.

Alexander Arbuthnot advises Vitruvian on cyber-security was the headline in Intelligence Online when he joined, while the article noted that the company had recently stepped up its investment in cyber-security. Darktrace appears to be one of two cyber-security companies in Vitruvians portfolio.

Relations were further cemented in 2018 when Alexander Arbuthnots colleague Sophie Bower-Straziota, then managing director at Vitruvian, was appointed to the board of Darktrace.

Darktrace and UK intelligence

Darktrace, which Alexander Arbuthnot describes as an AI [artificial intelligence] based cyber-security company, was established by members of the UK intelligence community in June 2013.

GCHQ, the UKs major surveillance agency, approached investor Mike Lynchregarded as Britains most established technology entrepreneur who then brokered a meeting between GCHQ officers and Cambridge mathematicians who co-founded the company.

Company material openly mentions the UK intelligence officials who founded Darktrace. It states that its team includes senior members of the UKs and USs intelligence agencies including the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), the Security Service (MI5) and the NSA.

Another co-founder was Stephen Huxter, a senior figure in MI5s cyber defence team who became Darktraces managing director. Soon after the company launched in September 2013, Darktrace announced that former MI5 director-general Sir Jonathan Evans had been appointed to its advisory board. Huxter welcomed Evans unparalleled stature in the field of cyber operations.

Huxter then hired 30-year GCHQ veteran Andrew France as chief executive of Darktrace. France, like Huxter, had been involved in dealing with cyber threats, rising to the position of deputy director of cyber defence operations at GCHQ, where he was charged with protecting government data from cyber threats.

France is also linked to Alexander Arbuthnots father, Lord Arbuthnot, who was until November 2018 a member of the advisory board of Information Risk Management (IRM), a cyber-security consultancy based in Cheltenham, the home of GCHQ. France is listed as one of IRMs experts.

Darktrace later appointed Dave Palmer, who had worked at MI5 and GCHQ, as its director of technology, while John Richardson OBE, director of security, had a long career in UK government security and intelligence working on cyber defence.

Darktrace staff has also included ex-MI6 officials, former senior managers at the UK Ministry of Defence, and veterans of the UK military, including the special forces.

We are a mixture of spooks and geeks, says Nicole Eagan, the chief executive of Darktrace, which now has a thousand employees and 40 offices worldwide. Poppy Gustafsson, another co-founder, has said that her work left her feeling like she was living in a story by the novelist John le Carr.

The insider threat

Vitruvians investee Darktrace appears to have been established in response to data leaks from Bradley (now Chelsea) Manning to Julian Assanges WikiLeaks and from NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden.

Darktrace was, in fact, incorporated just four days after the first of the Snowden revelations was published by The Guardian in June 2013. These showed GCHQ to be operating programmes of mass surveillance.

As Channel 4 News put it when Darktrace launched: In the wake of the massive data leaks from Edward Snowden and Bradley Manning, Darktrace is targeting corporate and government customers by promising to track down troublesome employees or intruders that are already within the firewall.

Another article on Darktrace, this time from Wired in 2018, noted, After Edward Snowdens data dump from the NSA and Chelsea Mannings transfer of military intelligence to WikiLeaks, governments and companies woke up to the dangers of sabotage from within.

Manning is currently in jail in the US after refusing to testify in the new grand jury for the ongoing WikiLeaks case. Assanges conversations with Manning form the basis of the US prosecution and attempts to extradite him from the UK.

Presiding over the UK legal case is Alexander Arbuthnots mother, Lady Arbuthnot, who as a judge has herself previously made rulings on Assange and now oversees the junior judge, Vanessa Baraitser.

MI5 and GCHQ have been especially concerned about leaks of secret government material since WikiLeaks published thousands of CIA files in its Vault 7 exposures in March 2017. The files the largest leak in CIA history showed how UK agencies held workshops with the CIA to find ways to hack into household devices.

Darktrace addresses the challenge of insider threat, the companys promotional literature states. It adds, the insider threat must be curbed to prevent unwitting vulnerabilities or data leaks.

Darktraces flagship product, called the enterprise immune system, is described as a self-learning cyber [artificial intelligence] technology that detects novel attacks and insider threats at an early stage.

The company pinpoints the particular problem of whistle-blowers by stating that Darktrace begins with the premise that a network has already been infiltrated and that some of the risk might come from a companys own employees.

It adds, Malicious employees have the advantage of familiarity with the networks and information they manipulate, and their credentials allow them to exfiltrate the most sensitive such information without raising red flags. Moreover, even well-intentioned employees present major security risks. Darktraces technology is specifically designed to deal with this problem.

The degree of interaction between the intelligence agencies and their ex-employees at Darktrace is not known. However, Darktrace clearly has connections to the highest levels of the UK and US governments.

In January 2015, Nicole Eagan accompanied British prime minister David Cameron on an official visit to Washington DC to discuss cyber-security policy with US President Barack Obama. It is unclear how the company was able to obtain an audience with the US president barely a year after it launched.

Eagan noted at the time that hostile agents develop increasingly stealthy and sophisticated attacks on valued data and lamented the damage that these threats can cause to hard earned reputations. She also noted that traditional methods of security are no longer enough.

Eagan went on to accompany Cameron on another visit, this time to Asia in July 2015. Cameron said Darktrace was flying the flag for the UK. She also accompanied Camerons successor, Theresa May on a trip to Japan in August 2017. Two of Darktraces founders were awarded OBEs earlier this year.

Arbuthnot, Symantec and WikiLeaks

Alexander Arbuthnot is linked to another company concerned with countering leaks, and WikiLeaks in particular. During 2010-16 he worked at Symantec, a US company producing cyber-security and anti-data leak products which has contracts with the US government. Arbuthnot eventually became head of global sales at the company.

In 2010, after Julian Assange and WikiLeaks hit the headlines with their revelations on US war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan, Symantec released a report titled, Avoiding a repeat of WikiLeaks: What can be done to prevent malicious insiders?

The report notes, Symantec has identified a distinct pattern of malicious insider activity that is easily blocked. It adds, In most cases the perpetrators are in a heightened state of emotional distress and very sloppy about their trade craft. The report makes clear that it regards Chelsea Manning as such a malicious insider.

Alexander Arbuthnot began working for Symantec four months after WikiLeaks started leaking the US State Department cables it had been given by Chelsea Manning.

Arbuthnot appears to have worked exclusively on issues of cyber-security and data protection since he joined Symantec, where he managed 22 people across the companys Americas, Europe and Asia sales team. It is likely that in this role, Arbuthnot championed sales of products intended to avoid a repeat of Wikileaks, in the words of the Symantec report.

Symantec has also published a document called Going all in on defending against insider threats which states, Government agencies have always been exceedingly concerned about security but that concern ramped up significantly in the wake of the Edward Snowden and Bradley Manning scandals. Regardless of the threat level, a systematic plan to combat insider threats is a must.

After Symantec, Arbuthnot went on to co-found Rightly, another company focused on data security, in April 2017. Rightly states that it aims to solve the problem of the public losing faith in companies to handle their personal data, due to the behaviour of a few key organisations, without naming those organisations. It adds: We work closely with web security firms to ensure that we exceed expectations for data security.

Arbuthnot himself states, We aim to change the world of personal information.

Darktrace, CIA and NSA

Darktrace has particularly focused on breaking into the US market and has recruited former CIA and NSA intelligence officers.

In November 2013, Mike Lynch, the investor initially approached with the idea of Darktrace, extolled the virtues of the company on a conference platform in London with Alec Ross, the then secretary of state Hillary Clintons technology adviser, and Martin Howard, GCHQs director of cyber policy. Ross has been personally critical of Julian Assange.

The conference was organised by the Cheltenham cyber-security consultancy IRM, on whose advisory board Lady Arbuthnots husband, Lord Arbuthnot, sat until November 2018.

The company quickly tapped the US intelligence community for new personnel. In July 2014, Darktrace announced the recruitment of two senior officials from the US intelligence community, specifically the NSA.

One was Jim Penrose, who spent 17 years at the agency as an expert in data security, and served as chief of the Operational Discovery Center, helping to develop new signals intelligence capabilities the mass surveillance programmes revealed by Edward Snowden.

The other recruit was Jasper Graham, another NSA veteran who as technical director worked with US Cyber Command to develop strategic planning for responding to cyber-attacks.

Little over a year after Darktrace launched, the company opened its first US office in Washington DC.

The following year, Darktrace was part of a select group chosen by the US government for a trade mission to Tokyo, Seoul and Taipei. In the same month, Darktrace announced another coup: the recruitment of the CIAs former chief intelligence officer, Alan Wade, to its board of advisors.

Wade spent 35 years in the CIA also serving as director of security before retiring in 2005 and was a recipient of several medals for his service. He now sits on the board of Assyst, a cyber-security company based in Herndon, Virginia, a 20-minute drive from CIA headquarters.

Another recruit to Darktrace was Justin Fier, its director for cyber intelligence and analytics, who came to the company after working for US intelligence agencies on counterterrorism. From 2002-2008 Fier worked for arms manufacturer Lockheed Martin, also in Herndon, Virginia.

Earlier this year, Darktrace recruited Marcus Fowler, a former Marine and 15-year veteran of the CIA, to be its new director of strategic threat. At the CIA, Fowler worked on developing global cyber operations and technical strategies and conducted nearly weekly briefings for senior US officials, he says.

It is unclear what relationship, if any, the NSA and CIA still has with its ex-employees at Darktrace.

The CIA has made clear that it is working to take down the WikiLeaks organisation. It was recently revealed that the CIA was given audio and video of Julian Assanges private meetings in the Ecuadorian embassy by a Spanish security company. These included privileged discussions with Assanges lawyers who are now representing him in the extradition case overseen by Alexander Arbuthnots mother, Lady Arbuthnot.

Alexander Arbuthnot and Lady Arbuthnot did not respond to requests for comment. DM

The Daily Maverick will launch Declassified UK a new investigations and analysis organisation run by the authors of this article at the end of this month.

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or if you are already an Insider.

Originally posted here:
The son of Julian Assanges judge is linked to an anti-data leak company created by the UK intelligence establishment - Daily Maverick

‘Will you come and help?’ Father of Julian Assange on campaign to free his son – Irish Examiner

At 80, John Shipton thought he would be enjoying his retirement, he tells Michael Clifford. Instead, he is touring European capitals campaigning for his son, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.

A parents work is never done. John Shipton entering his ninth decade. Hed like to kick back, maybe learn a few recipes, stroll at a leisurely pace towards the declining years.

But his son needs him. His sons health is in serious danger and his future looks dark, with the prospect of spending decades, if not the remainder of his life, in prison.

His son is Julian Assange. Its a name that is familiar to most people, although many would, at this remove, find it difficult to couple his celebrity standing with his talent or achievement.

Assange is an Australian who has been a serious thorn in the side of the powerful. His Wikileaks organisation was responsible for disseminating information that showed what exactly the US and its allies were getting up to in foreign wars.

Wikileaks exposed war crimes. It was the receptor for whistleblower Chelsea Mannings treasure trove of documents that painted a picture of torture and maltreatment by US forces in Iraq, among other crimes.

Vanity Fair described the resultant stories as one of the greatest journalistic scoops of the last 30 years they have changed the way people think about how the world is run.

In 2011, Assange sought refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London at a time when he was due to be extradited to Sweden on what he claims were trumped-up allegations of sexual assault.

His belief was that Swedish law would make it more easier to pack him off to the US, where he could be tried and imprisoned as an enemy of the state. At the time, the Americans were not actively seeking to extradite him.

So he moved into the Ecuadorian embassy in Knightsbridge and stayed there until declining relations with his host ended with expulsion last April. Following that, he was sentenced to 50 weeks in prison for skipping bail, a term that concluded on September 23.

He is now back on remand awaiting an extradition hearing in response to a request from the US, where he faces charges that carry a penalty of up to 175 years in prison.

He is being detained in Britains high-security Belmarsh Prison, which houses some of the worst of the worst of criminals. Assange is a category B prisoner, which means hes not considered an immediate danger to fellow human beings or society in general, but his conditions of detention are still onerous.

Hes locked up 22 or 23 hours a day, his father says. Its a grade A maximum security prison. Because those in it are treated like terrorists, thats what Julian is being subjected to.

Shipton was in Dublin recently on a flying visit that now forms part of his current job. That entails lobbying, meeting, and publicising on behalf of his son. Shipton is on a tour of European capitals trying to round up support.

Im at this full time, he says.

This is my job now. I came over from Melbourne this year and spent a month in the UK and saw how they kept mucking around with Julian, even with visiting him. Theyd mess up an appointment and then you couldnt go again for another two weeks.

When I met him I got a bit overwrought and he said to me: Will you come and help, will you move to the UK? What am I going to say? No, Im going to surfers paradise for a holiday.?

Assange is in a bad way, there is no doubt about that. Both physically and psychologically, his condition is deteriorating. The prison conditions are onerous but they come following eight years cooked up in the embassy, at times under serious stress. The day before arriving in Dublin Shipton had been in to see his son.

As you would expect after nine years of persecution, hes a bit down in the dumps, he says.

The report of the UN rapporteur on torture says it all really, pointing out that he has every sign of having suffered torture with both physical and mental results.

The last year and a half in the embassy was pretty rough. He was under constant surveillance, there were microphones everywhere. The place he used to have any meetings in there was the ladies loo because it was the only place that there were no mikes.

There was a problem even getting food during that time. Some weekends he didnt have any food because they didnt allow visitors some of the time.

The UN rapporteur on torture, Nils Melzer, did visit Assange with two doctors in June in Belmarch and were highly condemnatory of the conditions in which he was being kept.

Last week, Melzer issued a further statement, saying Assanges life was at risk and that he must not be extradited to the US as a consequence of exposing serious governmental misconduct.

In a cursory response sent nearly five months after my visit, the UK government flatly rejected my findings, without indication any willingness to consider my recommendations, let alone to implement them, or even provide the additional information requested, Milzer said.

He continues to be detained under oppressive conditions of isolation and surveillance not justified by his detention status.

Melzer goes further and offers an opinion on what is driving the harsh treatment.

In my view, this case has never been about Mr Assanges guilt or innocence, but about making him pay the price for exposing serious governmental misconduct, including alleged war crimes and corruption, he says. Unless the UK urgently changes course and alleviates his inhumane situation, Mr Assanges continued exposure to arbitrariness and abuse may soon end up costing his life.

There is, in the narrative of Assanges plight, one bitter irony to his current predicament.

In 2011, when he sought refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy, the US was not actively pursuing him. Barack Obamas administration decided to leave him be, most likely weighing up that pursuit of this thorn would be interpreted as a vicious attack on the free press.

Then during the 2016 presidential campaign, Assanges Wikileaks made an intervention, releasing hundreds of emails originating with Hillary Clinton. The news hit her at the polls, although its difficult to assess how damaging they were.

In any event, her rival, Donald Trump, was thrilled with this development. I love Wikileaks, he said at the time.

The love wasnt everlasting. Since coming to power, Trump has railed against many forms of the free press. And his government has requested Assanges extradition to stand trial for spying.

If he is extradited, his father doesnt have much confidence in the prospects of a fair trial.

The espionage law courts are held in Elizabeth, Virginia, says Shipton. Its a town where all the constituents are from the intelligence community. Every judgement in the espionage courts they say just go to jail. Its not theoretical. If hes tried he will go to jail.

The next hearing on extradition isnt scheduled until February and on the basis that he previously did skip bail while awaiting an extradition hearing he is unlikely to get bail. For his family and close friends, the most immediate issue is his health rather than the political and legal vortex into which he has been drawn.

At a recent court appearance on October 21, he was described by eyewitnesses as appearing distressed and disorientated.

He is subject to a legal process, but few could argue that it is anything more than political. Assange published leaked material. In that he was performing an act of journalism.

Manning, for instance, was prosecuted and served seven years of what was originally a 35-year sentence. But Assanges role was that of publisher.

Much of Wikileaks most serious material was presented in collaboration with leading global newspapers, including the New York Times and The Guardian.

His father believes that the attack on the press through Assange is not fully appreciated.

Its in the self interests of all journalists and news corporations to ensure that this is fought, he says.

Whats also at issue is the benefit to all of us because this kind of journalism is aimed at ensuring that countries obey international law. Without that, what do we have?

The point is well made but is thrown into stark relief by the lukewarm response that Assanges plight has elicited in much of the media.

Alan Rusbridger, editor of The Guardian at the time of the Manning story, wrote earlier this year that he was opposed to the pursuit of Assange by the US, even though his own relationship with Assange had been fraught.

We fell out, as most people eventually do with Assange, says Rusbridger. I found him mercurial,

untrustworthy and dislikable; he wasnt keen on me either. All the collaborating editors disapproved of him releasing unredacted material from the Manning trove in September 2011.

That charge is one that is repeatedly laid at Assanges door. His father rejects it, saying that, on the eve of publication in 2011, Assange stayed up long into the night redacting the names of up to 10,000 individuals whose lives or livelihoods could be placed in danger.

Yet he has acquired a reputation for being difficult, untrustworthy, and susceptible to sometimes pursuing agendas rather than letting the material speak for itself.

His father has a different take.

The quality of being innocent of charges does not take into account the characteristics of the person involved, he says. Shiptons response to a question about the suggestion by some that his son is his own worst enemy draws a blunt Aussie response.

Thats horseshit, he says. What youre dealing with reminds me of the line in [TS] Eliot about the King and Thomas Beckett. Will anybody rid me of this turbulent priest? A lot of that stuff is designed to just get at Julian with no basis for it.

Julian is a joy of a man, hes very positive, sweet natured. Hes determined but he always could get his own way by being charming. He didnt have to bully anyone.

Assange was born in Townsville, Australia, in 1971, but his parents split soon after his birth. His mother married an actor, Brett Assange, from whom Julian takes his name.

He had an itinerant childhood, moving over two dozen times with his mother. She didnt believe informal education, and he had spells being home-schooled, took correspondence courses, and studied informally with college academics.

He developed an interest in and aptitude for computers and began hacking at the age of 16. Later on, he got into programming and worked with different companies and agencies, including a spell assisting the police in tackling child exploitation online.

In 2006, he and others formed Wikileaks which over the following four years published a steady stream of material sourced from secret government files across the world. Then, in 2011, the organisation published the Chelsea Manning material and Wikileaks became a source of both huge admiration among elements of the public, and contempt in the corridors of power.

The allegations of sexual assault in Sweden, which prompted the first attempt to extradite Assange from the UK in 2011, are a particular sore point with his father.

Assange and his supporters were convinced that the whole case was merely a ruse to get him to Sweden from where it would be considered a lot easier to have the US extradite him. That theory was ultimately never put to the test. While he was holed up in the embassy, Sweden dropped the case. Earlier this year, after the exit from the embassy, it was reopened.

They had this thing for nine years, Shipton says.

They abandoned it twice and resurrected it twice. They had four prosecutors. Three of the allegations expired on time and the fourth expires next year. Theyre claiming its taken all this time to assemble the case against him. Nine years. It took eight years to get a man on the moon.

"A lot of itis prominent people in their legal system wanting their names in the media on the back of Julian. Its disgusting really.

After Julian went into the embassy, his father was an annual visitor from Down Under.

Id come over from Melbourne for two weeks every Christmas and visit him, Shipton says.

And over the years you could easily see how it was getting harder, how his health was deteriorating. He had a particular problem with an abscess in his tooth which left him in terrible pain. At one point, we applied for permission to allow him cross into the UK to access some proper dental treatment but the British authorities wouldnt allow it.

And what about the battle ahead, does he think that his sons extradition can be stopped.

Naturally I think we will win. But we are going to need help.

For now, Shipton is focused on getting that help, on doing what he considers to be his job. Over the coming weeks and months he is scheduled to visit Denmark, Switzerland, Sweden, and Germany, and intends an extended stay in Italy, where there is particularly strong support for Assange.

At the end of the interview in a Dublin hotel, a barman appears and asks: Are you the Julian Assange people?

The reporter points him to the mans father in the corner finishing off a sandwich. The barman, who says he is Bulgarian, is over like a shot, eager to shake the hand of the man who sired Julian Assange.

A great man, the barman says of Assange. What is being done to him is all wrong. They are trying to silence him.

Shipton appears chuffed at the approach, reassured that support for his son is out there in all manner of nooks and crannies of society.

Assanges extradition hearing is scheduled to begin in February, but the process could drag on for a year after that. If his circumstances dont change in the interim, fears for his physical and psychological health will inevitably heighten.

Read the original post:
'Will you come and help?' Father of Julian Assange on campaign to free his son - Irish Examiner

Roger Stone trial: Roger Stone could be the next ex-Trump campaign official to end up in prison – CBS News

Washington In closing arguments Wednesday, the prosecution portrayed former Trump campaign adviser Roger Stone as a liar trying to protect himself and help then-candidate Donald Trump win the 2016 presidential race at any cost.

"Roger Stone does not get to pick and choose which facts he thinks are important and lie about the rest of them," said prosecutor Jonathan Kravis in the closing arguments of a trial that ended a week earlier than expected. "Roger Stone sees a chance to help the Trump campaign, and he jumps at it."

Stone wasindictedon seven charges of lying to Congress, witness tampering and obstruction. He is accused of collaborating withWikiLeaksto release Democrats' emails that were hacked by Russia in order to damage Hillary Clinton, Mr. Trump's 2016 opponent and he is accused of lying about it. He is also charged with tampering with a witness, radio personality Randy Credico, pressing him not to cooperate with a congressional investigation that involved Stone.

When you have "a witness who goes before a congressional committee and tell them to lie, that is witness tampering," said Kravis.

Prosecutors presented evidence throughout the trial that Stone tried to get information from WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, specifically asking for details about the hacked emails that WikiLeaks published in order to influence the 2016 election.

But the defense team claimed Stone lacked corrupt intent in his words and actions and never actually had access to WikiLeaks.

"I guess you can say Stone played the campaign, letting them believe that he had some connection" to WikiLeaks, said defense attorney Bruce Rogow in his closing arguments.

Several high-profile witnesses were called to testify, including former deputy Trump campaign manager Rick Gates andSteve Bannon, a former Trump campaign chief executive and White House senior counselor.

Roger Stone himself, however, chose not to take the stand.

Gates, who testified on Tuesday as part of a cooperation agreement with the government,pleaded guilty last year to charges stemming from theMueller investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and the Trump campaign's role in it. His testimony in a separate case helped to convict Paul Manafort, a former Trump campaign chairman, of conspiracy against the United States.

On the stand for the prosecution, Bannon pointed to Stone as the apparent point of access between the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks.

According to Bannon, Stone is the only person affiliated with the Trump campaign who claimed to be in contact with WikiLeaks. In August 2016, Stone emailed Bannon to say that it was possible for Trump to win the election, and said, "I know how to win, but ain't pretty." Under oath, Bannon said he interpreted this to mean that Stone was talking about campaign "dirty tricks" and "opposition research."

In his earlier grand jury testimony, Bannon had said, "I think it was generally believed that the [Trump campaign's] access point [to Assange] would be Roger Stone."

Stone's social media appears to foster that impression.

On Sunday, October 2, 2016, Stone tweeted, "Wednesday @Hillary Clinton is done. #Wikileaks." Two days later, on Tuesday, October 4, Assange said documents would subsequently be released every week and that some of the documents would be related to the presidential election. Three days after Stone's tweet, on October 7, WikiLeaks released the emails of John Podesta, Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman. (This happened soon after the "Access Hollywood" tape of Mr. Trump's vulgar language about grabbing women was published.)

When asked why he emailed Stone on October 4, 2016, Bannon replied, "Because Roger was the guy who knew about WikiLeaks and knew Julian Assange."

After WikiLeaks released Podesta's hacked emails in October, a Trump official messaged Stone to say, "Well done."

Stone's defense, however, points out that it's unknown what that was in reference to.

"Could have been that he went to a steakhouse and wanted a steak 'well-done,'" said Rogow.

The prosecution outlined lies that Roger Stone allegedly told about his written communications, his conversations with Mr. Trump and his involvement with WikiLeaks.

Stone told a House Intelligence Committee that Credico was his only backchannel to Assange. Credico, however, testified that Stone bragged to him about having his own backchannel to Assange. Prosecutors believe it was another Stone associate, Jerome Corsi.

Stone claimed he hadn't asked anyone to do anything for him regarding WikiLeaks. But emails showed Stone asked Corsi and Credico to pass along his request for more updates to Assange.

Stone's defense team argued that his actions lacked corrupt intent because Stone voluntarily testified before the House Intelligence Committee and urged jurors to consider his "state of mind" given that the scope of the congressional hearing was Russia not Assange.

Furthermore, said Rogow, "There could be no sensible motive in trying to protect the campaign when it was long since over, and Mr. Trump was the president of the United States."

Stone allegedly threatened to harm both Credico whom he was accused of using to communicate with Assange and his dog if he didn't plead the fifth and refuse to testify in a congressional investigation.

The jurors were shown texts from Stone telling Credico to "Do your Frank Pentangeli" in front of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. In the movie "The Godfather Part II," Frank Pentangeli lies to Congress, pretending not to know anything incriminating about the Corleone family.

Stone also texted Credico, "I guarantee you are the only one who gets indicted for perjury if you're stupid enough to testify."

The prosecution said this was evidence that Stone was trying to shield information from Congress.

"Roger Stone is a political strategist," Kavis said to the jury. "He knows how this is going to look [when] the committee was looking into the Russian interference" in the 2016 election.

But the defense framed the story differently.

In his closing arguments, Rogow said, "Stone and Credico for years have joked about the Godfather" and "this is nothing malignant."

Throughout his trial, several controversial people came to support Stone, including alt-right commentatorMilo YiannopoulosandGavin McInnes, founder of Proud Boys, an extremist group with ties to white nationalism.

On the first day of his trial before he left early because he said he had food poisoning a person outside of the courtroom yelled, "You'll get to see Manafort soon," referring to the former Trump campaign chairman who wassentenced by the judge in this trialto more than six years in prison.

Stone, who has filed to have his charges acquitted, faces up to 20 years in prison. A verdict could come as soon as Thursday.

The conclusion of Stone's trial coincided with a new and more public phase of the impeachment inquiry of President Trump, who is accused of seeking a politically charged quid pro quo with the president of Ukraine and pressuring him to launch investigations that could benefit his reelection campaign.

Clare Hymes contributed reporting.

Follow this link:
Roger Stone trial: Roger Stone could be the next ex-Trump campaign official to end up in prison - CBS News

Prosecution says Roger Stone lied to Congress to protect Trump; defense says there was no motive – USA TODAY

Former Trump campaign advisor Roger Stone professed innocence and sought legal funds after being charged in the Russia probe with lying, witness tampering and obstruction in connection with the 2016 presidential election. (Jan. 31) AP

WASHINGTON As an impeachment inquiry that threatens Donald Trump's presidency gains steam in the U.S. Capitol, jurors in a trial happening just across the street will soon decide if Roger Stone, the president's ally, lied to Congress to help and protect him.

Jurors will start deliberating Thursday after hearing testimonies over the past week. A guilty verdict could send the longtime GOP operative to prison and will make him the latest Trump ally to be convicted of a crime as a result of the special counsel investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election. An acquittal could reinforce Trump and his allies'longstanding claim that the Russia probewas a "witch hunt" meant to hurt him politically.

During closing arguments Wednesday, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Kravis told jurors that Stone obstructed a congressional investigation to help Trump and his campaign. Stone liedto lawmakers repeatedly, depriving them of evidence they needed as they pursued their own investigation into Russia and possible ties to the Trump campaign, Kravis said in a packed federal courtroom.

"A person who is acting in good faith would not say and do the things that Roger Stone said and did ... It shows you exactly what was in his head all along: to obstruct the committees investigation," Kravis told jurors.

Trump: Trump says he's 'too busy' to watch impeachment inquiry hearing, but he's tweeting about it

Defense attorney Bruce Rogowsaid the government's assertion that Stone lied to protect the Trump campaign is "absolutely false."

"It makes no sense," Rogow told jurors, adding that the campaign was long over and Trump was already president when Stone testified before Congress in 2017. "Why would Stone lie, why would he make stuff up? ... There is no purpose, there is no reason, there is no motive."

Stonefaces seven charges: one count of obstruction of an official proceeding, five counts of false statements and one count of witness tampering.

The allegations stem from Stone's interactions with the Trump campaign in the summer of 2016, around the time that WikiLeaks, an anti-secrecy group, began publishing troves of damaging emails about the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton, Trump's presidential rival.

Prosecutors said Stone, a fixture in GOP politics known for his flamboyance and combativeness, lied to the House Intelligence Committee about his back-channel efforts to push for the release of those emails. They saidStone lied about the identity of the person who first tipped him off about WikiLeaks' plans. They said Stone denied that he passedon what he learned to the Trump campaign. And they said Stonedenied the existence of text messages and emails in which he talked about WikiLeaks.

"After he told these lies, Stone engaged in a relentless campaign to silence the person who could expose the lies," Kravis told jurors.

Steve Bannon: Trump campaign saw Roger Stone as its 'access point' to WikiLeaks

The trial presented the first clear pictureof how the Trump campaign sought to learn about WikiLeaks' plans to publish emails that would hurt Clinton and help Trump. Testimonies from government witnesses portrayedthe campaign as an eager beneficiary of WikiLeaks' email dumps, and Stone as the conduit who boasted about his connections to the group.

Prosecutors presented jurors with dozens of emails and text messages many with crude language showing Stone communicating with senior members of the Trump campaign about WikiLeaks and threatening a possible congressional witness. They displayed charts showing the numbers of phone calls Stone had with the campaign, including with the candidate himself, around the time DNC emails were released.

Steve Bannon, the campaign's former chief executive, testified that the campaign saw Stone as its "access point" to WikiLeaks.

Rick Gates, another former campaign official, testified about a phone call between Stone and Trump in July 2016, shortly after WikiLeaks began publishing DNC emails. Gates said he was in the car with Trump when he heard him talking to Stone. After Trump hung up, he told Gates, "More information is coming." Trump told former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigators that he did not recall being told that Stone or anyone in his campaign discussed the release of hacked emails.

Randy Credico, a comedian and radio host Stone claimed was the person who told him about WikiLeaks' plans, testified that he was never the backchannel to the group. Prosecutors said Stone invoked Mafia references from "The Godfather"to urge Credico to either lie or not testify before Congress.

'5 categories of lies': Prosecutors tie Roger Stone's alleged crimes to Trump and his campaign

Defense attorneys sought to discredit Credico,telling jurors that he "played" Stone and made him believe he hadback-channel capabilities with WikiLeaks. "Theres no question that Randy Credico mislead Roger Stone," Rogow told jurors.

Rogow said prosecutors are asking jurors to draw inferences from emails and text messages that lacked context and did not show anything "illegal" or"malignant." And while Stone and Trump talked on the phone multiple times in the summer of 2016, there's no evidence on what the two talked about.

"How can you draw an inference ... when you have no idea on what was said in these calls?" Rogow said.

Rogow also said the government's case relied on actions that are not criminal.

"There was nothing illegal about the campaign being interested in what WikiLeaks was going to be sending out This is what happens in campaigns. They look for opposition information," Rogow told jurors."In fact, so much of this case deals with that question that you need to ask, 'So what?'"

Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Marando took offense in that assertion.

"Well if thats the state of affairs that were in, Im pretty shocked. Truth matters. Truth still matters," Marando told jurors. "We live in a world nowadays with Twitter, tweets, social media, where you can find any view, any political view you want. You can find your own truth."

Stone lied to obstruct an investigation and tampered with a witness, Marando repeated."That matters, and you don't look at that and say, 'So what?'"

Stone's trial attracted conservative figures, such as Milo Yiannopoulos, the controversial, far-right provocateur, and Michael Caputo, a former Trump campaign adviser.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/13/roger-stone-trump-allys-trial-over-russia-wikileaks-concludes/2581039001/

See more here:
Prosecution says Roger Stone lied to Congress to protect Trump; defense says there was no motive - USA TODAY

Former aide: Trump campaign reaction to 2016 WikiLeaks dump was ‘a state of happiness’ – WPTV.com

A top aide to Donald Trump's 2016 campaign revealed new details in court testimony Tuesday about Trump's reaction to dumps of information from WikiLeaks at key moments in the race.

Former deputy campaign chair Rick Gates testified that he was riding in a Chevy Suburban from LaGuardia Airport in New York in mid-2016 when Trump took a late-evening phone call from his longtime associate Roger Stone, where the pair apparently discussed WikiLeaks' planned release of hacked Democratic emails.

"After Mr. Trump got off the phone with Mr. Stone, what did Mr. Trump say?" prosecutor Aaron Zelinsky asked Gates. "He indicated more information would be coming," Gates responded, in testimony at Stone's criminal trial in Washington.

Gates said two secret service agents also witnessed the call. The call happened days after WikiLeaks' first release on July 22, 2016, of emails the Russian military hacked from the Democratic National Committee.

"For months, information had been talked about" in the campaign prior to the July 22 drop of emails, Gates said Tuesday. "The campaign was in a state of happiness" in the wake of the July release.

His testimony flies in the face of repeated denials by both Stone and Trump that they had ever discussed WikiLeaks. Trump said he did not "recall" any conversations in written answers to special counsel Robert Mueller, and also told Mueller that he first learned about the hacked emails "at or shortly after the time it became the subject of media reporting."

The revelation is among the details that's been withheld from the public in Mueller's final report on Russian interference in the 2016 election. When the report was released in May, the Justice Department redacted key portions about Trump's reaction to the WikiLeaks releases because the information was related to Stone's trial. This was a routine move, but it blunted the impact of some damaging allegations against Trump and how his campaign knowingly benefitted from Russian meddling.

Gates' reveal of what Trump said to him after speaking with Stone puts in even sharper relief how much Trump himself knew about how the Russian hack and release of Democratic emails could help his campaign.

According to the Mueller report, Gates previously told investigators that the Trump campaign "was planning a press strategy, a communications campaign, and messaging" based on potential WikiLeaks releases. In the final stretch of the 2016 campaign, Trump made near-daily references to WikiLeaks at his rallies, sometimes reading directly from the messages and latching onto theories that were being simultaneously promoted by Kremlin-controlled news outlets.

Prosecutors haven't filled in details on whether Stone got confidential information from WikiLeaks through a supposed backchannel. Stone is accused of lying to Congress about what he discussed with the campaign regarding WikiLeaks and about the supposed backchannel, among other charges. He has pleaded not guilty.

Gates was one of the most significant witnesses of the Mueller investigation and has continued to be a key witness in cases prosecutors have pursued. Tuesday marked the third time Gates has testified at a criminal trial, but the first time he is speaking to a jury about interactions with Trump.

Gates pleaded guilty last year to two crimes and has cooperated with prosecutors in exchange for what he hopes will be a lenient sentence. His cooperation is winding down after nearly two years -- Gates' lawyers and the Justice Department told a judge on Monday that his case will be ready for sentencing, which could happen as soon as next month.

Read more here:
Former aide: Trump campaign reaction to 2016 WikiLeaks dump was 'a state of happiness' - WPTV.com

Julian Assanges judge and her husbands links to the British military establishment exposed by WikiLeaks – Daily Maverick

Members of the media gather outside Westminster Magistrates Court, where WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was due to face a trial after he was arrested in London, 11 April 2019. (Photo: Andy Rain/EPA-EFE)

It can also be revealed that Lady Arbuthnot has received gifts and hospitality in relation to her husband, including from a military and cybersecurity company exposed by WikiLeaks. These activities indicate that the chief magistrates activities cannot be considered as entirely separate from her husbands.

Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom, a former defence minister, is a paid chair of the advisory board of military corporation Thales Group, and was until earlier this year an adviser to arms company Babcock International. Both companies have major contracts with the UK Ministry of Defence (MOD).

The revelations highlight concerns about conflicts of interest. Lady Arbuthnot began presiding over Assanges legal case in 2017 and ruled this June that a full hearing would begin next February to consider the request for extradition from the UK made by the Trump administration.

British judges are required to declare any potential conflicts of interests to the courts, but it is our understanding that Lady Arbuthnot has not done so.

Lady Arbuthnot has recently appointed a district judge to rule on Assanges extradition case, but remains the supervising legal figure in the process. According to the UK courts service, the chief magistrate is responsible for supporting and guiding district judge colleagues.

Assange is currently being held in Belmarsh maximum security prison in London in conditions described by UN special rapporteur on torture, Nils Meltzer, as psychological torture. If transferred to the US, Assange faces life in prison on espionage charges.

Lady Arbuthnot financially benefited from organisations exposed by WikiLeaks

At a time when Lady Arbuthnot was in her former position as a district judge in Westminster, she personally benefited from funding together with her husband from two sources which were exposed by WikiLeaks in its document releases.

The British parliaments register of interests shows that in October 2014, Lady Arbuthnot was provided with tickets worth 1,250 to the Chelsea Flower Show in London along with her husband. The tickets were provided by Bechtel Management Company Ltd, part of the major US military corporation, Bechtel, whose contracts with the UKs Ministry of Defence include a project worth up to 215m to transform its Defence Equipment & Support Organisation, the body that buys and supports all the equipment used by the British armed forces.

Another of Bechtels business lines is industrial cybersecurity, a term which is often a euphemism for cyber warfare and surveillance technology.

WikiLeaks releases on Bechtel have shown the companys close connections to US foreign policy. Cables published in 2011, for example, show that the US ambassador to Egypt, Margaret Scobey, pressured the Ministry of Electricity and Power to award a tender for technical consultancy and design of Egypts first nuclear plant to Bechtel.

In another personal benefit declared to parliament, Lady Arbuthnot, again together with her husband, had flights and expenses worth 2,426 paid for a visit to Istanbul in November 2014. This was to promote and further bilateral relations between Britain and Turkey at a high level, according to Lord Arbuthnots declaration to the register of interests.

These expenses were paid by the British-Turkish Tatlidil, a forum established in 2011 during the visit to London of Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdoan and announced with then prime minister David Cameron. Tatlidil describes its objectives as facilitating and strengthen [sic] relations between the Republic of Turkey and the United Kingdom at the level of government, diplomacy, business, academia and media.

Its main role is to hold an annual two-day conference which is attended by the president of Turkey, and Turkish and British ministers. Lord Arbuthnot also attended the Tatlidil in Wokingham, a town just outside London, in May 2018.

As subjects of unwanted leaks, both Bechtel and Tatlidil have reason to oppose the work of Assange and WikiLeaks. Although the payments were entered into the parliamentary register of interests, the parties in the court case were not informed about them. Although Assanges trial has attracted significant criticism around the world, Lady Arbuthnot did not consider it necessary to mention these payments to the parties, public and media.

The Turkey connection

In a key legal judgment in February 2018, Lady Arbuthnot rejected the argument of Assanges lawyers that the then warrant for his arrest should be quashed and instead delivered a remarkable ruling.

She rejected the findings of the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detentiona body composed of international legal expertsthat Assange was being arbitrarily detained, characterised Assanges stay in the embassy as voluntary and concluded Assanges health and mental state was of minor importance.

Lady Arbuthnot became involved in the Assange legal case around September 2017 and presided over the hearing on 7 February 2018, before delivering her judgment a week later. During some of this period 29 January to 1 February her husband was again in Turkey visiting Erdoan and other senior Turkish government officials.

Some of these officials had been specifically exposed by WikiLeaks and had reason to oppose Assanges release. There is no suggestion that Lord Arbuthnot was asked to, or did, exert any pressure on Lady Arbuthnot, nor that she succumbed to any such pressure, but there is an appearance of bias which could have been avoided had this connection been revealed and had Lord Arbuthnot avoided meeting those individuals at that time.

Arbuthnot was part of a four-member delegation, the others being Baroness Neville-Jones, a former chair of the British joint intelligence committee, which co-ordinates GCHQ, MI5 and MI6; Lord Polak, the president of Conservative Friends of Israel; and Lord Trimble.

Among those who Arbuthnot and the other Lords met on the trip were foreign minister Mevlt avuolu and energy minister Berat Albayrak, Erdoans son-in-law. In 2016, WikiLeaks had published 57,934 of Albayraks personal emails, of which more than 300 mentioned avuolu, in its Berats Box release.

Thus at the same time Lady Arbuthnot was presiding over Assanges legal case, her husband was holding talks with senior officials in Turkey exposed by WikiLeaks, some of whom have an interest in punishing Assange and the WikiLeaks organisation.

The ramifications of Assanges exposure of Berat Albayrak and the ruling AKP Party, which had occurred just over a year before, were ongoing at the time of the Lords meetings in Turkey. WikiLeaks publications led to a crackdown on the media in Turkey reporting it, including the imprisonment of journalists and an all-out ban on access to WikiLeaks in the country.

The visit of Lord Arbuthnot and other British lords to Turkey was paid for by the Bosphorus Centre for Global Affairs which describes itself as an NGO monitoring the accuracy of news on Turkey. However, WikiLeaks Berats Box files revealed that the centre was financed by Berat Albayrak and acted as a government front to suppress reporting critical of the government. The centre has also been exposed as running a number of pro-government troll accounts.

It is not known what was discussed on Lord Arbuthnots trip to Turkey, or if the issue of Assange was raised. However, the contacts that the husband of Assanges judge had with powerful political figures who had recently been exposed by WikiLeaks raises concerns about conflicts of interest and whether these should have been declared by Lady Arbuthnot if they have not been.

Lord Arbuthnots military and intelligence connections

Lord Arbuthnot is a member of the House of Lords and was the defence procurement minister in the Conservative government from 1995-97. He later served as chief whip during William Hagues leadership of the party. Arbuthnot was a strong supporter of David Camerons war in Libya in 2011 and it was Cameron who proposed the then James Arbuthnot MP for a peerage in 2015.

Lord Arbuthnot also has connections to former officials in the UK intelligence services which WikiLeaks has exposed in its publications and which have conducted intelligence operations in the UK against WikiLeaks.

Until December 2017, Lord Arbuthnot was one of three directors of a private security firm, SC Strategy, along with the former director of MI6, Sir John Scarlett, and Lord Carlile. Until June 2019, Arbuthnot remained a senior consultant to SC Strategy. Scarlett is mentioned in WikiLeaks releases and has largely remained out of public debates around privacy and surveillance.

Little is known of SC Strategy, which does not have a website, but Companies House lists an address in Watford. Carlile states on his register of interests that SC Strategy was formed by him and Scarlett in 2012 to provide strategic advice on UK public policy, regulation, and business practice. It lists one client as the Qatar Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Investment Authority.

It has been reported that SC Strategy appears to maintain a degree of clout in Whitehall and that in 2013 and 2104 the company had a private meeting with the cabinet secretary Sir Jeremy Heywood.

Lord Arbuthnots former partner at SC Strategy, Lord Carlile, was the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation in 2001-11 and is a prominent public defender of the intelligence services.

Lord Arbuthnot was also until February 2019 an adviser to the military corporation, Babcock International, on whose board sits the former head of GCHQ, Sir David Omand.

Until November 2018, Arbuthnot was a member of the advisory board of Information Risk Management, a cybersecurity consultancy based in Cheltenham, the home of GCHQ, one of whose experts is Andrew France, a former deputy director for cyber defence operations at GCHQ.

Before becoming a peer, Lord Arbuthnot was a member of the parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee from 2001-06. He is also currently an officer of the all party parliamentary group on cybersecurity which is administered by the Information Security Group (ISG) at Royal Holloway, University of London. The ISG manages a project worth 775,000 that is part-funded by GCHQ.

Lord Arbuthnot himself appears in documents published by WikiLeaks, including two confidential US diplomatic cables. A December 2009 US confidential cable notes Arbuthnot telling an official in the US embassy in London that he supported President Obamas speech on US strategy towards Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Member of the British military establishment

Lord Arbuthnots past and present positions make him firmly a part of the British military industrial community. One of his profiles states that he has a long history of involvement at the top of UK defence and political life. WikiLeaks has styled itself as an adversary of the military community, with many of its releases focusing on the milieu in which people like Lord Arbuthnot operate.

Arbuthnot is a former chair of the parliamentary defence committee a position he held for nine years between 2005 and 2014 during which time WikiLeaks gained worldwide attention through its publishing of files on the Iraq and Afghan wars, in which the UK military was involved. He is also a former member of the national security strategy joint committee and the armed forces bill committee.

Arbuthnots parliamentary profile states: From time to time the member receives hospitality from the UK defence forum, the all-party parliamentary group for the armed forces and the all-party parliamentary group on defence and security issues.

Lord Arbuthnot is also the chair of the advisory board of arms corporation Thales Group which has been exposed by WikiLeaks in various releases.

Thales also has major contracts with the MOD including a 700m drone project and a 600m deal to maintain the royal navys warships. One of Thales lucrative business lines is cybersecurity and its website disparagingly refers to WikiLeaks and Assange personally as being able to steal information.

Thales produces watchkeeper drones used by the British military in Afghanistan which have been exposed in WikiLeaks releases. Arbuthnot is a strong supporter of drones: he was the chair of the defence committee when it produced a report highly supportive of British operations in 2014 which recommended bringing watchkeeper to full operating capability.

Lord Arbuthnots parliamentary profile also listed Babcock International as being a personal client in his role as consultant with SC Strategy until February 2019. Babcock has more than 22bn worth of contracts with the MOD and is its largest supplier of support services, supporting more than 70% of all MOD flying training hours.

Like Thales, Babcock has a business line in cyber intelligence and security. Arbuthnot was the procurement minister in 1996 when the government announced the sale of the controversial privatised Rosyth naval dockyard to Babcock.

Lord Arbuthnot is also chair of the Information Assurance Advisory Council, a body whose sponsors have included US arms corporations Raytheon and Northrop Grumman, and which also works on cybersecurity, among other digital information issues. Raytheon is extensively exposed in WikiLeaks releases.

Conflict of interest

Lord Arbuthnots links to the British military establishment constitute professional and political connections between a member of the chief magistrates family and a number of organisations and individuals who are deeply opposed to the work of Assange and WikiLeaks and who have themselves been exposed by the organisation.

UK legal guidance states that any conflict of interest in a litigious situation must be declared. Judicial guidance to magistrates from the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice is clear:

Members of the public must be confident that magistrates are impartial and independent. If you know that your impartiality or independence is compromised in a particular case you must withdraw at once Nor should you hear any case which you already know something about or which touches upon an activity in which you are involved.

Our understanding is that Lady Arbuthnot has failed to disclose any potential conflicts of interest in her role as judge or chief magistrate.

Lady Arbuthnot is known to have stepped aside from adjudicating two other cases due to potential conflicts of interest, but only after investigations by the media. In August 2018, as the judge at the heart of tech giant Ubers legal battle to operate in London, she recused herself to avoid any perceived conflict of interest with her husband.

Lady Arbuthnot reinstated Ubers London licence after it had been judged not a fit and proper private car hire operator. She eventually withdrew from hearing further appeals by the company after an Observer investigation raised questions about links between her husbands work and the company.

Qatar Investment Authority (QIA), the countrys sovereign wealth fund, is a major investor in Uber. QIA was also a client of SC Strategy, where Lord Arbuthnot was a director and then consultant. Lady and Lord Arbuthnot claimed that neither knew QIA invested in Uber, despite it being one of the companys largest shareholders.

In 2017, Lady Arbuthnot also stepped aside from adjudicating a case concerning the broadcast of offensive material on the Holocaust when the defendants legal team raised the issue of reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of the judge. This was related to her husbands involvement with Conservative Friends of Israel, a body of which Arbuthnot is a former chair and which had in the past paid for at least one visit to Israel.

Neither Lady nor Lord Arbuthnot returned requests for comment. DM

Daily Maverick will launch Declassifieda new UK-focused investigations and analysis organisation run by the authors of this article at the end of this month.

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or if you are already an Insider.

The rest is here:
Julian Assanges judge and her husbands links to the British military establishment exposed by WikiLeaks - Daily Maverick