By Zach DeMeyer Posted November 27, 2019

Full disk encryption (FDE) is one of the most critical security features to enable on your users systems. Realizing this, both Microsoft and Apple created FDE software for their respective operating systems. In this post, we will focus on Bitlocker, Microsofts FDE solution, and guide you on how to enforce FDE for Windows systems.

When enabled, FDE software like BitLocker encrypts the hard drive while its data is at rest. In order to unlock the drive for use that is, decrypt it the systems user needs to enter their password. That way, if a bad actor steals a machine and removes the hard drive, they still cannot access the data stored on it.

As a failsafe, Bitlocker and other FDE software generally include some sort of recovery key that unlocks a drive in case an IT admin removes the drive from a damaged system or the user forgets their password. These keys need to be properly managed to ensure that the drive can be securely recovered later if need be, but more on that in a second.

Over the years, many hackers have breached an organization because a stolen system or hard drive contained confidential information. By locking down the drive entirely, organizations prepare themselves for the worst and rest assured knowing their data is encrypted at-rest.

Additionally, several compliance regulations demand some form of disk encryption to meet requirements. Enforcing FDE for Windows (and other) systems ticks that major box on IT admins compliance checklist.

For Windows, IT admins can enable BitLocker fairly easily by means of a policy or software solution specific to managing Bitlocker. The process is generally straightforward; an admin chooses a Windows system (or group of systems), and turns on Bitlocker using one of these methods. By the next system reboot, Bitlocker encrypts the at-rest hard drive.

Although enforcing FDE on Windows systems is relatively easy, managing Bitlocker FDE after the fact is another story. Many FDE enablement (Read more...)

Here is the original post:
The IT Guide to Enforcing Full Disk Encryption Windows Edition - Security Boulevard

Law360 (November 27, 2019, 2:51 PM EST) -- The legal architect behind the FBI's headline-grabbing demand for Apple to unlock the iPhone of a dead suspect in the San Bernardino terrorist attack now says encryption is essential to protect Americans' cybersecurity.

Jim Baker, the FBI's general counsel from January 2014 to January 2018, said in an interview with Law360 that the FBI should abandon its long-held position that tech companies should build a way for law enforcement to access encrypted communications. Baker was at the center of a watershed moment in the encryption debate when he butted heads in 2016 with Apple, which argued that allowing U.S. authorities to...

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know whats happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

The rest is here:
Why The FBI's Former Top Lawyer Now Embraces Encryption - Law360

Another statistical surveying concentrate titled 2019-2026 Global Cloud Encryption Market Report (Status and Outlook) discharged by The Research Corporation can extend as it kept on assuming an amazing job in building up dynamic impacts on the worldwide market. The report subtleties the far reaching and collective examination of Cloud Encryption Market covering past, present, and estimate period. The report at that point covers focused market situation, territorial nearness, business scope, improvement openings, and future gauge. The market is relied upon to tremendous development manure the anticipated years 2019-2026.

The Research Corporation have included another examination study Title Global Cloud Encryption Market Size, Status and Forecast 2019-2026 with definite data of Product Types [, Premise Software, Cloud-based Software and Managed Software], Applications [Oil and Gas, Mine and Metallurgy and Other] and Key Players Such as CipherCloud Inc., Hytrust Inc., Gemalto NV, IBM Corporation, Netskope Inc., Secomba GmbH, Skyhigh Networks Inc., Sophos Group Plc., Symantec Corporation, Thales e-Security Inc.

Cloud Encryption Market is growing at a steady CAGR within the forecast period of 2019-2026.

Get Sample PDF(Including Full TOC, Table)@ https://www.theresearchcorporation.com/request-sample.php?id=14777

Cloud encryption is a service provided by cloud storage providers, where data or text is converted using encryption algorithms and then placed in the storage cloud. Encryption changes everything, so only authorized parties can receive and view communication. Encryption is performed by gibberish encryption of common data using an algorithm called password. Secure data is called password text. Retrieving encrypted data is as simple as entering the correct password.

Significant Regions with leading countries Of Cloud Encryption Market covered in this report: Asia-Pacific (Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Japan, Philippines, Korea, Thailand, India, Indonesia, and Australia), Europe (Turkey, Germany, Russia UK, Italy, France, etc.), North America (United States, Mexico, and Canada.), South America (Brazil etc.), The Middle East and Africa (GCC Countries and Egypt.)

By Deployment Type

Infrastructure-as-a-service, Software-as-a-service, Platform-as-a-service.

By Operation Type

Healthcare, Government and Utilities, Telecom and IT, Retail, Others

By Software Type

Risk Management Mapping, Seismic Amplitude Analysis, Portfolio Aggregation, Performance Tracking, Navigation System, Resource Valuation, Reservoir Characterization, Reservoir Simulation, Drilling

Grab Your Report at an Impressive Discount @https://www.theresearchcorporation.com/ask-for-discount.php?id=14777

Statistical Cloud Encryption Market of some important social science facts: In several sectors mentioned in The Research Corporation market report is as describe global Cloud Encryption in terms of investment potential and the possibilities described to achieve success in the near future. Key segments of the global market analyze product types, SMBs and large corporations.

Customization of the Report: This report can be customized as per your needs for additional data or countries. Please connect with our sales team (sales@theresearchcorporation.com)

In this study, the years considered to estimate the market size of Cloud Encryption Market are as follows:

History Year: 2014-2018

Base Year: 2018

Estimated Year: 2019

Forecast Year 2019 to 2026

Table of Content:

Enquiry before buying@ https://www.theresearchcorporation.com/enquiry-before-buying.php?id=14777

About Us

The Research Corporation symbolizes current market trends in the global industry. Our mastery in the field of market insights and analysis makes our company an ideal platform for clients seeking pioneering research in the lucrative global market fields.

At The Research Corporation we work diligently on delivering prudent market insights with sound market intelligence; with that we take pride in delivering comprehensive industry insights based on the market, market competitors, products and global customers. Through our erudite market approach, The Research Corporation has become synonymous to delivering best product service.

Contact:

The Research Corporation

William K (Sales Manager)

1632 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10028, USA

+1 929 299 7373

sales@theresearchcorporation.com

Link:
Big Boom in Cloud Encryption Market over 2019-2026 with CipherCloud Inc., Hytrust Inc., Gemalto NV, IBM Corporation and more - Market Expert

A close analysis of the cybersecurity attacks of the pastshows that, in most cases, the head of the cyber kill chain is formed by somekind of privilege abuse. In fact, Forrester estimates that compromised privileged credentials play a role in at least 80 per centof data breaches.

This is the reason privileged access management (PAM) has gained so much attention over the past few years. With securing and managing access to business-critical systems at its core, PAM aims to provide enterprises with a centralised, automated mechanism to regulate access to superuser accounts. PAM solutions ideally do this by facilitating end-to-end management of the privileged identities that grant access to these accounts.

However, the scope of privileged accesssecurityis often misconceived and restricted to securing and managing root account passwords alone. Passwords, beyond a doubt, are noteworthy privileged access credentials.But the constant evolution of technology and expanding cybersecurity perimeter calls for enterprises to take a closerlook at the other avenues ofprivileged access, especially encryption keyswhichdespite serving as access credentials for huge volumes of privileged accounts, are often ignored.

This article lays focus on the importance encryption key managementwhy enforcing SSH key and SSL certificate management is vital, and how by doing so, organisations can effectively bridge the gaps in their enterprise privileged access security strategy.

1. Uncontrolled numbers of SSH keys trigger trust-based attacks

The average organisation houses over 23,000 keys and certificates many of which grant sweeping access to root accounts, says aPonemon survey. Also, a recent report about the impact of insecured digital identitiesstates that 71 per cent of the respondents did not have any idea about the number of keys or the extent of their access within the organisation.Without a centralised key management approach, anybody in the network can create or duplicate any number of keys. These keys are often randomly generated as needed and are soon forgotten once the task they are associated with is done. Malicious insiders can take advantage of this massive ocean of orphaned SSH keys to impersonate admins, hide comfortably using encryption, and take complete control of target systems.

2. Static keys create permanent backdoors

Enterprises should periodically rotate their SSH keys to avoid privilege abuse, but huge volumes of unmanaged SSH keys make key rotation an intimidating task for IT administrators. Moreover, due to a lack of proper visibility on which keys can access what, there is widespread apprehension about rotating keys in fear of accidentally blocking access to critical systems. This leads to a surge of static SSH keys, which have the potential to function as permanent backdoors.

3. Unintentional key duplication increases the chance of privilege abuse

For the sake of efficiency, SSH keys are often duplicated and circulated among various employees in an organisation. Such unintended key duplication creates a many-to-many key-user relationship, which highly increases the possibility of privilege abuse. This also makes remediation a challenge since administrators have to spend a good amount of time revoking keys to untangle the existing relationships before creating and deploying fresh, dedicated key pairs.

4. Failed SSL certificate renewals hurt your brand's credibility

SSL certificates, unlike keys, have a set expiration date. Failing to renew SSL certificates on time can have huge implications on website owners as well as end users. Browsers don't trust websites with expired SSL certificates; they throw security error messages when end users try to access such sites. One expired SSL certificate can drive away potential customers in an instant, or worse, lead to personal data theft for site visitors.

5. Improper SSL implementations put businesses at risk

Many businesses rely completely on SSL for internet security, but they often don't realize that a mere implementation of SSL in their network is not enough to eliminate security threats.SSL certificates need to be thoroughly examined for configuration vulnerabilities after they are installed. When ignored, these vulnerabilities act as security loopholes which cybercriminals exploit to manipulate SSL traffic and launch man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks.

6. Weak certificate signatures go unheeded

The degree of security provided by any SSL certificate depends on the strength of the hashing algorithm used to sign the certificate. Weak certificate signatures make them vulnerable to collision attacks. Cybercriminals exploit such vulnerabilities to launch MITM attacks and eavesdrop on communication between users and web servers. Organisations need to isolate certificates that bear weak signatures and replace them with fresh certificates containing stronger signatures.

Bridging the gaps in your PAM strategy

All the above scenarios highlight how important it is to widen the scope of your privileged access security strategy beyond password management. Even with an unyielding password manager in place, cybercriminals haveplenty of room to circumvent security controls and gain access to superuser accounts by exploiting various unmanaged authentication identities, including SSH keys and SSL certificates. Discovering and bringing all such identities that are capable of granting privileged access under one roofis one important step enterprises should take to bridge gaps in their privileged access security strategy.For, today's unaccounted authentication identities could become tomorrow's stolen privileged credentials!

Error: Please check your email address.

More about PAMSSH

View original post here:
Six reasons for organisations to take control of their orphaned encryption keys before it triggers the next security breach - CSO Australia

TheGlobal Encryption Software Market the report gives CAGR values alongside its vacillations for the particular estimate time frame. The report contains start to finish investigation and estimation of different market related variables that are amazingly vital for better basic leadership. The Encryption Software report gives complete clarification of market definition, showcase division, focused examination and key advancements in the business. This statistical surveying report is surrounded with the most fantastic and complex apparatuses of gathering, recording, evaluating and dissecting market information. Market report contains information that can be really essential when it is tied in with overwhelming the market or making an imprint in the market as a most recent developing.

The examination additionally consolidates R&D status, channel abilities, and local development. Whats more, the report offers showcase gauges and piece of the pie for the conjecture time frame. The exploration report holds the information sourced from the essential and auxiliary research group of industry specialists and the in-house databases. The report contains significance on land spread, bits of the general business, key procedures, improvement structures, and distinctive financials frameworks of industry.

Key players cited in the report:

Dell, Thales E-Security, Eset, Symantec, IBM Corporation, Sophos, Ciphercloud, Pkware, Mcafee, Gemalto, Trend Micro, Microsoft Corporation

Request your Sample PDF Report: @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/download-sample/?rid=1826

Competitive Landscape

Key players of the global Encryption Software market are profiled on the basis of various factors, which include recent developments, business strategies, financial strength, weaknesses, and main business. The Encryption Software report offers a special assessment of top strategic moves of leading players such as merger and acquisition, collaboration, new product launch, and partnership.

Encryption Software Market: Scope of the Report

Along with the market overview, which comprises of the market dynamics the chapter includes a Porters Five Forces analysis which explains the five forces: namely buyers bargaining power, suppliers bargaining power, threat of new entrants, threat of substitutes, and degree of competition in the Encryption Software Market. It explains the various participants, such as system integrator, intermediaries and end-users within the ecosystem of the market. The report also focuses on the competitive landscape of the Encryption Software Market.

Click Here to Get Exclusive Discount:

Report Enquiry For Ask For Discount

Table of Content

1 Introduction of Global Encryption Software Market

2 Executive Summary

3 Research Methodology of Verified Market Research

4 Global Encryption Software Market Outlook

5 Global Encryption Software Market, By Deployment Model

6 Global Encryption Software Market, By Solution

7 Global Encryption Software Market, By Vertical

8 Global Encryption Software Market, By Geography

Overview, North America, U.S., Canada, Mexico, Europe, Germany, U.K., France ,Rest of Europe, Asia Pacific, China, Japan, India, Rest of Asia Pacific

9 Global Encryption Software Market Competitive Landscape

10 Company Profiles

Complete Report is Available @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/

Additional Offerings:

Econometric modeling

Acquisition, divestment, and investment analysis

Analysis of business plans

Patent analysis

Positioning and targeting analysis

Demand forecasting

Analysis of product and application potential

Highlights of TOC:

Mrket Overview:It starts with product overview and scope of the global Encryption Software market and later gives consumption and production growth rate comparisons by application and product respectively. It also includes a glimpse of the regional study and Encryption Software market size analysis for the review period 2014-2026.

Company Profiles:Each company profiled in the report is assessed for its market growth keeping in view vital factors such as price, Encryption Software market gross margin, revenue, production, markets served, main business, product specifications, applications, and introduction, areas served, and production sites.

Manufacturing Cost Analysis:It includes industrial chain analysis, manufacturing process analysis, the proportion of manufacturing cost structure, and the analysis of key raw materials.

Market Dynamics:Readers are provided with a comprehensive analysis of Encryption Software market challenges, influence factors, drivers, opportunities, and trends.

Market Forecast:Here, the Encryption Software report provides consumption forecast by application, price, revenue, and production forecast by product, consumption forecast by region, production forecast by region, and production and revenue forecast.

This report can be customized to meet your requirements. Please connect with our representative, who will ensure you get a report that suits your needs.

We Also Offer Customization on report based on specific client equirement:

Free country Level analysis for any 5 countries of your choice. Free Competitive analysis of any 5 key market players. Free 40 analyst hours to cover any other data point.

About Us:

Veified Market Research has been providing Research Reports, with up to date information, and in-depth analysis, for several years now, to individuals and companies alike that are looking for accurate Research Data. Our aim is to save your Time and Resources, providing you with the required Research Data, so you can only concentrate on Progress and Growth. Our Data includes research from various industries, along with all necessary statistics like Market Trends, or Forecasts from reliable sources.

Contact Us: Mr. Edwyne Fernandes

Call: +1 (650) 781 4080

Email: [emailprotected] https://www.linkedin.com/company/verified-market-research

See the article here:
Encryption Software Market Global Industry Demand, Scope and Strategic Outlook,Growth Analysis,Business Opportunities and Future Scope Till 2026 -...

/ The US, UK, and Australia want Facebook to hold off on end-to-end encrypting Messenger until they have a way to inject themselves into the conversation. picture alliance / Getty Images

Here we go again.

US Attorney General William Barr is leading a charge to press Facebook and other Internet services to terminate end-to-end encryption effortsthis time in the name of fighting child pornography. Barr, acting Secretary of Homeland Security Kevin McAleenan, Australian Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton, and United Kingdom Secretary of State Priti Patel yesterday asked Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to hold off on plans to implement end-to-end encryption across all Facebook Messenger services without including a means for lawful access to the content of communications to protect our citizens.

The open letter comes months after Barr that warrant-proof cryptography is extinguishing the ability of law enforcement to obtain evidence essential to detecting and investigating crimes and allowing criminals to operate with impunity, hiding their activities under an impenetrable cloak of secrecy. The new message echoes , which stated:

it is imperative that all sectors of the digital industry including Internet Service Providers, device manufacturers and others to continue to consider the impacts to the safety of children, including those who are at risk of exploitation, when developing their systems and services. In particular, encryption must not be allowed to conceal or facilitate the exploitation of children.

Facebook has played a significant policing role on social media, providing reports of child abuse imagery and attempts by offenders to groom children online to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) in 2018, for instance. And there is no doubt the child pornography problem has exploded in recent years. A revealed that the number of images of sexual abuse of children has been growing exponentially over the past two decades, with investigators flagging over 45 million images and videos last year. Facebooks reports were 90 percent of the 18.4 million cases reported to NCMEC in 2018a number double that of 2017 and 18 times greater than the number reported in 2014.

Barr and his cohorts noted that NCMCE estimates that 70% of Facebooks reporting12 million reports globally for content related tochild sexual exploitation and terrorism would be lost if all Messenger traffic is protected by end-to-end encryption and Facebook cannot screen the content through its safety systems. This would significantly increase the risk of child sexual exploitation or other serious harms, Barr and the others claimed.

The letter also broadened its message beyond Facebook to the entire tech industry, stating:

We therefore call on Facebook and other companies to take the following steps:

There are some major problems with this plan. First, backdoored encryption is fragile at best and likely to be quickly broken. Second, encryption is available in enough forms already that blocking its use by major service providers wont stop criminals from encrypting their messages. If secure encryption is a crime, only criminals will have secure encryptionand it will be really easy to be a criminal, since all it takes is a download or some simple mathematics.

Much of the reasoning behind the need to prevent end-to-end encryption by defaultan argument used when Apple introduced it as part of iMessage and repeated multiple times sinceis that criminals are inherently stupid, and giving them protection by default protects them from being stupid and not using encryption.

Facebook has offered end-to-end encryption as an option for Messenger conversations for years now, and it offers the service as part of WhatsApp as well. But because encryption requires an extra (and non-intuitive) step to turn it on for Messenger, most people dont use itapparently even criminals sending messages they think arent under surveillance. Its like the effect in that casethe belief is that criminals and its concealing them from being observed.

The problem is not all criminals are idiots. And while Facebook may have contributed massively to the reporting of child pornography in recent years, there are other services that even the idiots could move to if it becomes apparent that theyre not out of sight. Take Telegram, for instancewhere much of 8chan moved to after the site lost its hostingor WhatsApp or Signal, which provide end-to-end voice and messaging encryption. On top of those, there are a host of dark Web and deep Web places where criminals, including those exploiting children, operate.

Based on conversations Ive had with researchers and people in law enforcement, there is a significant amount of tradecraft related to these types of crimes floating around in forums. Not all of it is very good, and people get caughtnot because they didnt have end-to-end encryption but because they used it with the wrong person.

Four years ago, when the focus was on catching terrorists instead of child pornographers, then-FBI Director James Comey decried the cynicism toward government spying and insisted that mathematicians and computer scientists to create encryption with a golden key for law enforcement and intelligence organizations. But as I pointed out then, all you have to do is look at to understand why a government-mandated backdoor would be risky at best. As Whitfield Diffie (half of the pair who brought us the Diffie-Hellman Protocol for encryption key exchange) put it in 1993 when warning against implementing key escrow and the Clipper Chip:

To reinforce these points, a group of leading computer science and cryptography researchersincluding some who actually broke the Clipper Chips key escrow scheme in 1997 warning yet again against government backdoors in encryption. These researchers noted they could create vulnerabilities in systems exploitable by people other than warrant-bearing, lawful searchers:

The complexity of todays Internet environment, with millions of apps and globally connected services, means that new law enforcement requirements are likely to introduce unanticipated, hard-to-detect security flaws. Beyond these and other technical vulnerabilities, the prospect of globally deployed exceptional access systems raises difficult questions about how such an environment would be governed and how to ensure that such systems would respect human rights and the rule of law.

The math and science of encryption has not stopped government from trying to change the rules, however. While Barr lacks the legal backing to force Facebook or other companies to comply with his demand, other members of the Five Eyes are pressing their fight against encryption with legal teeth.

Last December, Australia passed a law that , dictating that service and application providers must be able to provide access on demand to individuals messages. While a similar effort four years ago in the United Kingdom failed, the UK has mandated Web blocking technologies to fight child pornography and other content-oriented crimesand the country could conceivably extend that blocking to companies that provide encrypted communications seen as a means for trafficking child exploitation.

In many ways, the arguments about end-to-end encryption seem mootconsidering that law enforcement and intelligence organizations already have so many other ways to watch for illicit activities and target suspects. DNS traffic, targeted warrants, and other legal vehicles to gain access to accounts (as with the still-active PRISM program), the targeting of hidden services on Tor (as with the), and end-point hacking all give officials a lot to work with without having to break the rest of the Internet in the process.

While fighting child exploitation, terrorism, or any other fundamental evil is vitally important, the risks posed by banning encrypted communications between citizens, customers and businesses, journalists and sources, whistleblowers and lawyers, and every other legal pairing of entities who may have some need to communicate in confidence are too high to justify mandating an untenable, universal, extraordinary level of access for government to communications.

Every US presidential administration for the past 50 years has demonstrated in some way why we should be concerned about abuse of surveillance powers. And we know from just how expansive those powers have grown. Thats part of the reason that Internet services have moved so decisively toward providing end-to-end encryption and removing themselves from the surveillance apparatus.

See more here:
The broken record: Why Barr's call against end-to-end encryption is nuts - Daily Stock Dish