The Bill of Rights consists of the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution, including the First Amendment. The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution in order to appease Anti-Federalists who thought the new Constitution did not provide adequate safeguards for rights of the people. (Image via Wikimedia Commons, public domain)
The Bill of Rights consists of the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
In response to the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, which guided the fledging nation from 1781 to 1798, the countrys leaders convened a convention in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787 to amend the Articles, but delegates to the Convention thought such a step would be inadequate and took the more radical one of proposing a new document. From the Virginia and New Jersey Plans, a Great (Connecticut) Compromise was reached that resolved some of the factional disputes between the large and small states. The Convention also adopted scores of other compromises in forming each of the three branches of the national government and the relationship between this government and the states.
When the Convention reported the Constitution to the states for ratification, the nation split between Federalist supporters of the new document and Anti-Federalist opponents, who were especially concerned that it did not, like most state counterparts, have a bill of rights (of the 11 state constitutions in place in the years after independence, 7 had bills of rights). To ensure ratification of the document, the Federalists offered concessions, and the First Congress proposed a Bill of Rights as protection for those fearful of a strong national government. The Bill of Rights came into effect in December 1791, after ratification by three-fourths of the state legislatures.
The level of support for the new Constitution varied. During the debate over its ratification, the Federalists grounded their support for the document in the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation. In late October 1787, the first in a series of 85 essays appeared in printbearing the pen name Publius. These essays, which became known as the Federalist Papers, were written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. They presented a succinct series of arguments that, even today, are revered in the annals of political theory. The essays addressed the manner in which the new republican government, based on federalism and separation of powers, would guard against the tyranny of interest groups and other threats.
However, the Anti-Federalists were not convinced that these safeguards were adequate. Led by George Mason, Patrick Henry, and Elbridge Gerry, the Anti-Federalists wrote their own essays, basing their arguments on the tyranny of the British monarchy so resented by the 13 original colonies. This faction sought additional protections that would guard against an overly centralized and oppressive national government.
Ratification of the U.S. Constitution was a slow and arduous process. Although the approval of only nine states was needed to ensure the documents ratification (Article VII), ultimately the support of all 13 states was secured. Thus from the ashes of the Articles of Confederation emerged a federal system with enduring features such as republicanism, separated institutional powers, and a system of checks and balances. The Constitution set forth the institutional structures, players, processes, and procedures for governing the new nation through a series of seven articles.
Despite the seemingly apparent victory achieved in ratifying the Constitution, the founders failed to resolve the continuing debate over limiting the powers of the national government. As Alexander Hamilton remarked in Federalist No. 84, the most considerable of the remaining objections is, that the plan of the convention contains no bill of rights. To ease the process toward ratification, supporters such as Revolutionary War hero George Washington had suggested creating a series of guarantees that would ultimately prevent the national government from tampering with certain rights and liberties deemed essential to a democratic form of government.
James Madison, who appears to have been influenced on the subject by Thomas Jefferson, took the lead in the First Congress in composing the Bill of Rights. Although the list of rights and liberties suggested by the former colonies was extensive, Madison narrowed it to 12 amendments, known as the Bill of Rights. Ten of these amendments became part of the U.S. Constitution in 1791 after securing the approval of the required three-fourths of the states.
The Bill of Rights resolved one of the most glaring deficiencies of the new Constitution preventing thegovernments abuse of individual liberties.
James Madison, who appears to have been influenced on the subject by Thomas Jefferson, took the lead in the First Congress in composing the Bill of Rights. Although the list of rights and liberties suggested by the former colonies was extensive, Madison narrowed it to 12 amendments, known as the Bill of Rights. Ten of these amendments became part of the U.S. Constitution in 1791 after securing the approval of the required three-fourths of the states. (Image via Wikimedia Commons, painted by John Vanderlyn 1816, public domain)
The First Amendment, one of the more symbolic and litigious of the amendments, guarantees fundamental rights such as freedom of religion, speech, and the press, and the rights to assemble peacefully and to petition the government. The free exercise clause in the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting religious beliefs and practices, although exceptions have been made in situations in which ceremonial practices threaten an individuals safety or welfare. The establishment clause of the First Amendment has been interpreted as calling for separation of church and state.
This separation has been observed through various legal precedents and U.S. Supreme Court interpretations of the wall of separation doctrine, which states that government laws may not have as their purpose an intent to aid religion. This doctrine has been further reinforced through a three-part Lemon test, named for the 1971 Supreme Court decision Lemon v. Kurtzman. The Lemon test requires that laws have a secular purpose, that their primary effect neither advances nor inhibits religion, and that they do not foster excessive government entanglement with religion.
The First Amendment also addresses freedom of expression. The free expression clause guarantees the rights of individuals and the press to speak freely about issues, even those deemed controversial. Freedom of speech has generated substantial debate and legal controversy. However, the clear and present danger test developed by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. in the 1919 Supreme Court decision Schenck v. United States provides the means for deciding whether a particular speech is protected by the First Amendment.
Under this test, the Court has upheld speech that advocates ideas or arguments, but has declared speech that incites violence or creates a clear and present danger to society to be unconstitutional. Nor are fighting words protected by the First Amendment, because they inflict injury or incite violence. The press is also protected by the doctrine of no prior restraint, which has developed out of the First Amendment. Under this doctrine, government restrictions and the licensing of media content prior to publication are unconstitutional.
Interpretations of the right to assemble have been further applied to include the right of association in organizations. Although the right to assemble includes peaceful protests, parades, and demonstrations, it does not extend to the right to prevent access to public buildings.
The Second Amendment provides for the maintenance of state militias, and it guarantees the right of citizens to bear arms. This amendment was considered important becausein the Revolutionary War citizens had to protect themselves from tyranny and threats to their safety and that of the nation.
The Third Amendment also has its roots in the Revolutionary War era. It protects personal privacy by preventing the quartering of soldiers in a private home without the owners consent in peacetime, or according to the prescribed law in times of war.
The Fourth Amendment prevents unreasonable searches and seizures, and requires authorities to show probable cause to obtain warrants to search and seize dwellings and property.
The Fifth Amendment also deals with personal rights and certain guarantees against the unconstitutional treatment of accused persons. It requires a grand jury indictment for serious crimes, prohibits repeated prosecution for the same offense (double jeopardy), and prevents the government from taking life, liberty, or property without due process of the law. The well-known saying taking the Fifth is derived from the provision that no persons shall be compelled in any criminal case to testify against themselves that is, submit to self-incrimination. This amendment also addresses the concept of eminent domain that is, the owner of private property seized for public use must receive just compensation for that property.
The Sixth Amendment sets forth additional guarantees for accused persons: the right to be informed of an accusation, the right to have a speedy and public trial, the right to confront witnesses, and the right to legal counsel for defense.
The Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to a jury in civil cases in which the value in controversy exceeds $20.
Also related to trials, the Eighth Amendment prohibits excessive bails and fines and cruel and unusual punishment for those found guilty of a crime.
The Ninth Amendment protects rights not specified in the Constitution, and the Tenth Amendment reserves for the states or citizens all other powers not delegated to the national government or denied to the states.
Despite their ratification as formal amendments to the U.S. Constitution, the amendments of the Bill of Rights were initially applied only to the powers of the federal government and not those of the states. This limited application was reaffirmed in the 1833 Supreme Court decision Barron v. Baltimore. That situation changed, however, after ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment on July 9, 1868, after the Civil War. It declared that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, and provided the basis for the argument that the rights in the first 10 amendments now applied to the states.
But even then,only selective incorporation, or the application of certain but not all portions of the Bill of Rights, occurred until a series of Court decisions among them, Gitlow v. New York (1925), incorporating freedom of speech, and Palko v. Connecticut (1937), which failed to incorporate the Fifth Amendment provision against double jeopardy because the Court did not, at that time, consider that right to be fundamental.
A recent book by Gerard N. Magliocca has demonstrated that, in part because the first 10 amendments did not follow the traditional form of previous bills or declarations of rights, it was not common to characterize the first 10 amendments as the bill of rights until after the Spanish-American War in 1898. At that time, American leaders promised that these rights (or at least some of them) would protect residents in the new foreign colonies that the nation had acquired.
Just as Federalists had used the bill of rights to assure state ratification of the Constitution in an earlier era, so too, modern American leaders subsequently used the protections to allay fears about increasing federal powers, such as those that Congress assumed during the New Deal, and to contrast American values with those of the totalitarian powers against which the nation was arrayed in World War II and the Cold War.
This list of guarantees has provided protections against the arbitrary and tyrannical treatment of citizens by their government, and has been understood to include a right to privacy.Many decisions by the Supreme Court have reinforced the protection of these liberties and further extended the application of the first Amendment and other provisions within the Bill of Rights to state and local governments.
This article was originally published in 2009 and updated in 2018. Daniel Baracskay teaches in the public administration program at Valdosta State University.
Originally posted here:
Bill of Rights | The First Amendment Encyclopedia
- Supreme Court revives NRA's lawsuit alleging that New York violated its First Amendment rights - POLITICO - June 2nd, 2024
- Opinion | The NRA deserved its First Amendment win at the Supreme Court - The Washington Post - The Washington Post - June 2nd, 2024
- Why Justice Sotomayor just handed the NRA a big Supreme Court victory - Vox.com - June 2nd, 2024
- NRA v. Vullo: A Big First Amendment Win at the High Court - Cato Institute - June 2nd, 2024
- Theres a First Amendment right to express Second Amendment views - Washington Examiner - June 2nd, 2024
- Unanimous First Amendment Victory for the NRA (Represented by the ACLU) - Reason - June 2nd, 2024
- In a Victory for Assange and First Amendment, UK Court Grants Right to Appeal Truthout - Truthout - June 2nd, 2024
- Supreme Court Says Government Bullying Can Violate the First Amendment - Goldwater Institute - June 2nd, 2024
- Preemption, the First Amendment, and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel on Todays Decisional Menu - SCOTUS Today - The National Law Review - June 2nd, 2024
- University of Michigan police officers suspension violated First Amendment, jury finds - MLive.com - June 2nd, 2024
- SCOTUS Unanimously Sides With NRA in First Amendment Case - The Reload - June 2nd, 2024
- Video is at the center of First Amendment case against North East School District - GoErie.com - June 2nd, 2024
- NRA gets 1st Amendment win as Supreme Court blasts NY official who pressured banks to cut ties with gun lobby - The Independent - June 2nd, 2024
- Cleveland Cliffs and its CEO should put on the big boy pants and stop going against the 1st Amendment: Today - cleveland.com - June 2nd, 2024
- TikToks Future in U.S. Depends on Bet on First Amendment - The New York Times - May 15th, 2024
- Opinion | Campus protests, young people and importance of the First Amendment - Bridge Michigan - May 15th, 2024
- Shielded Speech: Exploring the First Amendment in Anonymous Online Discourse - Disruptive Competition Project - May 15th, 2024
- The 8 First Amendment cases the Supreme Court will decide this term - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - May 15th, 2024
- Umut Bayramoglu: The night the First Amendment died on Jayhawk Boulevard, and why you should care (Column) - The Lawrence Times - May 15th, 2024
- Court dismisses First Amendment lawsuit filed against Palomar Health by one of its directors - The San Diego Union-Tribune - May 15th, 2024
- Yolo County group gets settlement with county over 1st Amendment - ABC10.com KXTV - May 15th, 2024
- TikTok creators sue to block law that could lead to a ban - The Washington Post - May 15th, 2024
- Letter to the Editor: That remarkable First Amendment Muddy River News - Muddy River News - May 15th, 2024
- TikTok sues the US over attempts to force its Chinese parent to sell the social media platform, citing First Amendment - ABC News - May 15th, 2024
- Sunday Business Page: Campus protests and the First Amendment - CBS Pittsburgh - May 15th, 2024
- First Amendment protections for public comment at government meetings - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - May 15th, 2024
- Survey shows: Most Americans are concerned about the future of free speech - Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - May 15th, 2024
- First Amendment argument 'not in play' with TikTok bill rebuttal: Ajit Pai - Fox Business - May 15th, 2024
- On resistance, revolution, and dissent campus protests in 44 states and the District of Columbia First Amendment ... - Foundation for Individual... - May 15th, 2024
- The Antisemitism Controversy Shows the Wisdom of the First Amendment The Future of Freedom Foundation - The Future of Freedom Foundation - May 15th, 2024
- Hate speech, the First Amendment and the college conundrum - The Hill - January 15th, 2024
- Big Oil Is Weaponizing The First Amendment - The Lever - January 15th, 2024
- Robert Post: 'There is growing pessimism about the future of free speech in the United States' First Amendment ... - Foundation for Individual Rights... - January 15th, 2024
- Court sends case of prosecutor suspended by DeSantis back to trial judge over First Amendment issues - The Associated Press - January 15th, 2024
- Professor's Lawyers Argue: Private University Student Newspapers Are Not Entitled to First Amendment Protection - Reason - January 15th, 2024
- Appeals court says DeSantis violated Andrew Warren's First Amendment rights - Creative Loafing Tampa - January 15th, 2024
- Lawsuit Over UC Santa Cruz's Diversity Statements Dismissed on Standing Grounds - Reason - January 15th, 2024
- First Amendment claim struck down in Project Veritas case focused on diary of Biden's daughter - The Associated Press - December 28th, 2023
- First Amendment claim struck down in Project Veritas case focused on diary of Biden's daughter - NBC News - December 28th, 2023
- Project Veritas's First Amendment Claim to the Diary of Biden's Daughter Denied By Judge - Vanity Fair - December 28th, 2023
- Veritas' First Amendment claim in Biden's daughter's diary rejected by judge - Axios - December 28th, 2023
- 2023 Year in Review: The U.S. Supreme Court's Busy Year of Free Speech and Tech Cases - EFF - December 28th, 2023
- Cook County Sheriffs Office accused of retaliation and First Amendment violations - Chicago Reporter - December 28th, 2023
- The Religious Liberty Step Too Far That Could Destroy the Common Good If We Let It - Justia Verdict - December 28th, 2023
- First Amendment Likely Protects Even Unlicensed Engineers' Right to Provide Expert Opinion in Government ... - Reason - December 28th, 2023
- Social Media Censorship and The First Amendment - Reason - December 28th, 2023
- Voices from the State University of New York at Fredonia: Banning of books contradicts our First Amendment - Evening Observer - December 28th, 2023
- 1st Amendment claim struck down in Project Veritas case focused on diary of Biden's daughter - Santa Fe New Mexican - December 28th, 2023
- Project Veritas First Amendment | US and World News | wvnews.com - WV News - December 28th, 2023
- 1st Amendment claim struck down in Project Veritas case focused on diary of Biden's daughter - News10NBC - December 28th, 2023
- 1st Amendment claim struck down in Project Veritas case focused on diary of Biden's daughter - WAND - December 28th, 2023
- First Amendment Claim Rejected in Project Veritas Case Focused on Diary of Biden's Daughter - NEWSnet media - December 28th, 2023
- Trump Demands Dismissal Of GA RICO Citing First Amendment Right To Ask Politicians To Do Crimes - Above the Law - December 20th, 2023
- Courts Are Choosing TikTok Over Children - The Atlantic - December 20th, 2023
- Legislators Don't Have First Amendment Right Not to Show Up to Legislature - Reason - December 20th, 2023
- These university presidents need to go back to school on the First Amendment - Washington Examiner - December 20th, 2023
- Is saying 'From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free' protected speech under the First Amendment? - Foundation for Individual Rights in... - December 20th, 2023
- UPDATE: Annapolis First Amendment Auditor Sentenced to 90 Days for Criminal Trespassing at Calvert Health ... - Southern Maryland News Net - December 20th, 2023
- Free Speech and "Harassment Restraining Orders" - Reason - December 20th, 2023
- East Lansing ordered to pay farm more than $800000 in First Amendment lawsuit - WKAR - December 20th, 2023
- RCFP urges SCOTUS to reverse ruling in First Amendment retaliation case - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press - December 20th, 2023
- What are the legal, practical bounds of free speech on college campuses? - University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign - December 20th, 2023
- Standing Guard | SCOTUS To Hear First Amendment Case | An Official Journal Of The NRA - America's 1st Freedom - December 20th, 2023
- What the college presidents got wrong about the First Amendment - WBUR News - December 20th, 2023
- Big win for the First Amendment in Virginia - Washington Examiner - December 20th, 2023
- Trump, in filing, asks judge to dismiss 'invalid' Georgia election interference charges - ABC News - December 20th, 2023
- First Amendment Auditor Sentenced To 90 Days In Jail For Criminal Trespass In Calvert County - Bay Net - December 20th, 2023
- The Bill of Rights Super-Quiz Civic Nebraska - Civic Nebraska - December 20th, 2023
- Second Amendment Roundup: Second Circuit Opines on New York's Gun Restrictions - Reason - December 20th, 2023
- Opinion | University presidents get schooled in free speech and antisemitism - The Washington Post - December 20th, 2023
- Is the racist tirade in a viral TikTok out of Midvale protected by the First Amendment? - KUTV 2News - December 20th, 2023
- Judge rejects town's ban on 'thin blue line' flag: 'Resounding win for the First Amendment' - Alabama's News Leader - November 17th, 2023
- An unprecedented First Amendment issue: Trump cites gag order appeal as reason for Thanksgiving extension to support three-pronged attack on Jack... - November 17th, 2023
- Trump strangely not mentioned during SCOTUS hearing on First Amendment case over encouraging violations of federal law - Law & Crime - March 31st, 2023
- Werewolf Therapeutics - On March 16, Entered Into A First ... - Kalkine Media - March 23rd, 2023
- Lawmakers submit more than 140 amendments as House opens process for first time in seven years - The Hill - January 30th, 2023
- National organization wants to join legal fight over Beachwood, police chiefs efforts to unmask anonymous cr - cleveland.com - January 30th, 2023
- 10 Facts About the First Amendment and Elections - January 22nd, 2023
- Freedom of Speech - Origins, First Amendment & Limits - HISTORY - January 22nd, 2023
- Auditors vow to descend on CT if law passed putting rules on First Amendment - FOX61 Hartford - January 22nd, 2023