Chelsea Manning, WikiLeaks source, fights subpoena seeking …

WikiLeaks source Chelsea Manning on Friday challenged a subpoena compelling her appearance before a federal grand jury convened in Alexandria, Virginia.

Attorneys representing Ms. Manning, a 31-year-old activist and former soldier, filed a motion to quash opposing a subpoena seeking her participation in unspecified grand jury proceedings scheduled next Tuesday, March 5, according to Chelsea Resists, a committee launched by her supporters.

The motion was filed with Judge Claude Hilton in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia and ordered sealed pending further proceedings, the committee said.

Joshua Steuve, a spokesperson for federal prosecutors in Alexandria, declined to comment.

Both the existence of the subpoena and Ms. Mannings objections were first reported by The New York Times late Thursday evening.

Given what is going on, I am opposing this, Ms. Manning told the newspaper. I want to be very forthright I have been subpoenaed. I dont know the parameters of the subpoena apart from that I am expected to appear. I dont know what Im going to be asked.

Despite the subpoena lacking specifics, Ms. Manning is presumably wanted for questioning about WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy organization she admittedly supplied with a trove of classified U.S. diplomatic and military files obtained while deployed in Iraq as an Army intelligence analyst. It requests her appearance at the same federal courthouse where the government previously questioned witnesses about WikiLeaks, and where prosecutors indicated months ago the existence of a sealed case charging Julian Assage, the website Australian-born publisher.

The Justice Department acknowledged in 2010 that the government was investigating WikiLeaks following its publication of material provided by Manning, including State Department cables and Pentagon documents detailing the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, among other files.

Manning was convicted by an Army judge in 2013 and sentenced to 35 years in military prison, but was released in 2017 after the majority of her punishment was commuted by former President Barack Obama during his last days in office. Prosecutors have refused to confirm or deny whether the government is gunning for Mr. Assange, notwithstanding evidence suggesting he has already in legal hot water, however.

Assange has been charged, prosecutors in Alexandria wrote in a filing entered for an unrelated case in August. The complaint, supporting affidavit, and arrest warrant, as well as this motion and the proposed order, would need to remain sealed until Assange is arrested in connection with the charges in the criminal complaint and can therefore no longer evade or avoid arrest and extradition in this matter, the filing said.

The Justice Department said the filing referencing charges against Mr. Assange was entered by mistake.

A nonprofit group, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, pounced on the error and sued seeking an order compelling the government to disclose details about any otherwise sealed charges against the WikiLeaks publisher prior to ultimately losing that case earlier this year.

More:
Chelsea Manning, WikiLeaks source, fights subpoena seeking ...

Why Chelsea Manning Is Fighting Her Grand Jury Subpoena

Former American soldier and whistleblower Chelsea Manning poses outside the Institute Of Contemporary Arts in London, England, ahead of an event on Oct. 1, 2018.

Photo: Jack Taylor/Getty Images

For Manning, the threat of further imprisonment is a particularly brutal one. Beginning in 2010, she was arrested, court-martialed, imprisoned, and tortured for exposing some of the worst crimes and brutalities of the Iraq and Afghan wars. She was released in 2017.

Given the secrecy of federal grand jury procedures, we cant know with any certainty to which potential case the subpoena pertains, or what Manning would be asked. But since it was issued in the Eastern District of Virginia, we can make the informed speculation that it relates to inadvertently disclosed charges filed under seal against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange in that same district.

The New York Times reported that there were multiple reasons to believe that the subpoena is related to the investigation of Mr. Assange, including the district where the subpoena was issued and the assistant United States attorney that requested the subpoena, who is tied to the Assange prosecution. Another Assange associate, David House, told the Washington Post that he testified before the grand jury as well. It was all related to disclosures around the war logs, House said, a reference to the Iraq war documents that Manning released and Wikileaks published.

Mannings decision to fight her subpoena, however, is not a question of protecting Assange, nor obstructing valid government investigations into federal crimes. Her challenge is an act of resistance against government repression and in defense of a free press.

It should go without saying that were the grand jury related to the prosecution of Assange for revealing government secrets, this would have profound implications for the First Amendment and the media, which the Trump administration has consistently demonized and threatened.

The decision to subpoena Manning in itself should be seen as a punitive act from a hostile administration. President Donald Trump himself has made clearhis desire to see the whistleblower behind bars. Within the first days of his presidency, Trump tweeted that Manning was an Ungrateful TRAITOR who should never have been released from prison. With a grand jury subpoena, the government has found a way to expose the whistleblower to re-incarceration.

I object strenuously to this subpoena, and to the grand jury process in general, said Manning in a brief statement released by her support committee. Weve seen this power abused countless times to target political speech. I have nothing to contribute to this case and I resent being forced to endanger myself by participating in this predatory practice.

Federal grand juries are some of the blackest boxes in the judicial system. Closed to the press, the public, and even attorneys for those who have been subpoenaed, the process is ripe for nefarious state use. For decades, federal grand juries have been used to investigate and intimidate activist communities from the late-19th-century labor movements, to the Puerto Rican Independence Movement and black liberationists of the last century, to environmentalists, anarchists, and indigenous-rights fighters more recently.

Prosecutors and other authorities use grand juries to map out political affiliations while sowing paranoia and discord. It is hard to see the subpoenaing of Manning, who gave exhaustive testimony at her court-martial and took full personal responsibility for her leaks, as anything but punitive.

The consequences for grand jury resistance are serious. Individuals who refuse to cooperate can be held in civil contempt by a judge and imprisoned for up to 18 months, the length of the grand jury. Its the sort of incarceration, like lengthy pretrial detentions, that give lie to the notion that our justice system runs on due process and just punishment. Facing no criminal charges,a witness should not, by law, be punitively imprisoned for refusal to comply. Yet thats exactly how resisting a grand jury can play out.

Grand-jury resisters are jailed for contempt on the explicit grounds of coercion: If they agree to talk, theyre released; or if it can be evidenced that they will never talk and the coercive grounds for imprisonment are undermined, the jailing is shown to be purely punitive, and a judge can be compelled to order their release.

While the federal grand jury purports to be a simple mechanism for investigating criminal offenses, civil rights attorney Moira Meltzer-Cohen, who is representing Manning in her effort to quash the subpoena, told the Intercept, it can be and historically has been used by prosecutors to gather intelligence to which they are not entitled, for example about lawful and constitutionally protected political activity.

Theres a grim irony, particularly in Mannings case, that the purported purpose of a federal grand jury is to act as a safeguard from the improper motivations of government. We need not support Assange personally to understand that his prosecution for publishing Mannings leaks would expose news organs who also published the documents like the Guardian, The Washington Post, and The New York Times to the same liability. The precedent that could be set for state repression of journalism is beyond troubling.

Mannings challenge to the grand jury subpoena thus suggests that, as shown during her court martial, the whistleblower understands the monumental First Amendment issues at stake in the prosecution of those who would expose government wrongdoing.

Chelsea gave voluminous testimony during her court martial. She has stood by the truth of her prior statements, and there is no legitimate purpose to having her rehash them before a hostile grand jury, said Mannings support committee, ChelseaResists, in a statement. By employing these tactics against her, the government is using a roundabout method to further punish Chelsea for her past actions, adding to the seven years of trauma, imprisonment and torture she has already endured.

The fact that it is Manning who must once again bear of the weight of the government against her, and risk more jail time, is a stinging injustice for an activist who has already endured so much for exposing vital and damning truths.

Read the rest here:
Why Chelsea Manning Is Fighting Her Grand Jury Subpoena

Chelsea Manning called to testify in Assange probe

By Rachel Weiner and Ellen Nakashima | Washington Post

Chelsea Manning has been subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury in the investigation of Julian Assange, officials said, one of several indicators that prosecutors remain interested in WikiLeaks publication of diplomatic cables and military war logs in 2010.

Prosecutors in Virginia have been pursuing a case based on conduct that predates WikiLeaks publication of hacked emails during the 2016 presidential campaign, and its not clear investigators are interested in that activity. Officials discussed the investigation of Assange, who founded WikiLeaks, on condition of anonymity because of the secrecy of the grand jury process.

Manning, whose subpoena was first reported by the New York Times, is a former Army private who served seven years in a military prison for passing secret State Department cables and military documents to WikiLeaks before receiving a commutation from President Barack Obama.

Mannings attorneys have filed a motion to quash the subpoena.

I object strenuously to this subpoena, and to the grand jury process in general, Manning said in a statement. Weve seen this power abused countless times to target political speech. I have nothing to contribute to this case and I resent being forced to endanger myself by participating in this predatory practice.

The subpoena was signed last month by Gordon Kromberg, a national security prosecutor on the Assange case. Kromberg last month persuaded a judge to leave sealed an indictment against Assange despite its inadvertent exposure in an unrelated court filing last year.

Under Obama, Justice Department officials had decided not to pursue charges against Assange and WikiLeaks after concluding that to do so could set a precedent that paved the way for prosecuting news organizations for publishing classified information. But the case got a fresh look under President Donald Trump.

Steve Vladeck, a professor at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law, said the Justice Department likely indicted Assange last year to stay within the 10-year statute of limitations on unlawful possession or publication of national defense information, and is now working to add charges. Theres nothing else that would make sense, he said.

The heart of the controversy is, theres never been a successful prosecution for publishing classified information, Vladeck said. There has always been the specter of a First Amendment defense.

Peter Zeidenberg, a national security defense attorney, said he cannot see grounds for Manning to refuse the subpoena. Shes already been prosecuted, shes been convicted, she served a sentence, he said. She has no Fifth Amendment privilege over self-incrimination. If she doesnt testify than shell be held in contempt.

Manning appears to be the latest individual subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury investigating Assange in the Eastern District of Virginia.

Last July, computer expert David House, who befriended Manning in 2010 at a hacker space in Boston he founded, testified for 90 minutes before the grand jury. In an interview, House said he met the WikiLeaks founder in January 2011 while Assange was under house arrest at Ellingham Hall, a manor house 120 miles northeast of London. Assange was fighting an extradition request by Sweden, where he faced an inquiry into allegations of sexual assault.

Assange asked House to help run political operations for WikiLeaks in the United States. Specifically, he wanted me to help achieve favorable press for Chelsea Manning, he said.

House, who testified in exchange for immunity, said the grand jury was interested in his relationship with Assange. They wanted full insight into WikiLeaks, what its goals were and why I was associated with it, he said. They wanted explanations of why certain things occurred and how they occurred. . . . It was all related to disclosures around the war logs.

The grand jury seemed interested in whether Assange had solicited Manning to hack on WikiLeaks behalf, but did not press very hard on that, he said. He was not asked about WikiLeaks 2016 release of Democratic emails, which U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed were hacked by Russians. Nor did he have personal knowledge of that, he said.

He was never told what charges prosecutors were contemplating.

House said his last contact with Assange was in 2013 and his last contact with WikiLeaks was in 2015.

House said he fears retribution for being associated with WikiLeaks and Manning in 2010 and does not believe the U.S. prosecution is warranted.

This is not an investigation borne out of a concern for national security, he said. It is an investigation borne out of retribution and revenge against Mr. Assange over the [2010] leak that he precipitated, and how this leak impacted the careers of politicians in Washington, D.C.

Daniel Domscheit-Berg, a onetime WikiLeaks spokesman who has grown estranged from Assange, said in an interview he was contacted by the German federal police in October 2017 and told that U.S. authorities wished to talk to him about the Manning-Julian connection. He also received a March 2018 letter repeating the request from then-U. S. Attorney in the Eastern District, Dana Boente.

He said the German police told him the FBI was interested in what possible contact possible coordination occurred between Assange and Manning, he said. The Americans appeared to be interested in possible solicitation by Assange of Manning, he said.

Domscheit-Berg told the German police he was not interested in speaking to the FBI.

Read the original here:
Chelsea Manning called to testify in Assange probe

Chelsea Manning subpoenaed to testify before grand jury in …

Prosecutors in Virginia have been pursuing a case based on conduct that predates WikiLeaks' publication of hacked emails during the 2016 presidential campaign, and it's not clear investigators are interested in that activity. Officials discussed the investigation of Assange, who founded WikiLeaks, on condition of anonymity because of the secrecy of the grand jury process.

Manning, whose subpoena was first reported by the New York Times, is a former Army private who served seven years in a military prison for passing secret State Department cables and military documents to WikiLeaks before receiving a commutation from President Barack Obama.

Manning's attorneys have filed a motion to quash the subpoena.

"I object strenuously to this subpoena, and to the grand jury process in general," Manning said in a statement. "We've seen this power abused countless times to target political speech. I have nothing to contribute to this case and I resent being forced to endanger myself by participating in this predatory practice."

The subpoena was signed last month by Gordon Kromberg, a national security prosecutor on the Assange case. Kromberg last month persuaded a judge to leave sealed an indictment against Assange despite its inadvertent exposure in an unrelated court filing last year.

Under Obama, Justice Department officials had decided not to pursue charges against Assange and WikiLeaks after concluding that to do so could set a precedent that paved the way for prosecuting news organizations for publishing classified information. But the case got a fresh look under President Donald Trump.

Steve Vladeck, a professor at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law, said the Justice Department likely indicted Assange last year to stay within the 10-year statute of limitations on unlawful possession or publication of national defense information, and is now working to add charges. "There's nothing else that would make sense," he said.

"The heart of the controversy is, there's never been a successful prosecution" for publishing classified information, Vladeck said. "There has always been the specter of a First Amendment defense."

Peter Zeidenberg, a national security defense attorney, said he cannot see grounds for Manning to refuse the subpoena. "She's already been prosecuted, she's been convicted, she served a sentence," he said. "She has no Fifth Amendment privilege over self-incrimination. If she doesn't testify then she'll be held in contempt."

Manning appears to be the latest individual subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury investigating Assange in the Eastern District of Virginia.

Last July, computer expert David House, who befriended Manning in 2010 at a hacker space in Boston he founded, testified for 90 minutes before the grand jury. In an interview, House said he met the WikiLeaks founder in January 2011 while Assange was under house arrest at Ellingham Hall, a manor house 120 miles northeast of London. Assange was fighting an extradition request by Sweden, where he faced an inquiry into allegations of sexual assault.

Assange asked House to help run political operations for WikiLeaks in the United States. "Specifically, he wanted me to help achieve favorable press for Chelsea Manning," he said.

House, who testified in exchange for immunity, said the grand jury was interested in his relationship with Assange. "They wanted full insight into WikiLeaks, what its goals were and why I was associated with it," he said. "They wanted explanations of why certain things occurred and how they occurred. . . . It was all related to disclosures around the war logs."

The grand jury seemed interested in whether Assange had solicited Manning to hack on WikiLeaks' behalf, but did not press "very hard" on that, he said. During her trial, Manning testified that she acted on her own to send documents to WikiLeaks and no one associated with WikiLeaks pressured her into giving more information.

He was not asked about WikiLeaks' 2016 release of Democratic emails, which U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed were hacked by Russians. Nor did he have personal knowledge of that, he said.

He was never told what charges prosecutors were contemplating.

House said his last contact with Assange was in 2013 and his last contact with WikiLeaks was in 2015.

House said he fears retribution for being associated with WikiLeaks and Manning in 2010 and does not believe the U.S. prosecution is warranted.

"This is not an investigation borne out of a concern for national security," he said. "It is an investigation borne out of retribution and revenge against Mr. Assange over the [2010] leak that he precipitated, and how this leak impacted the careers of politicians in Washington, D.C."

Daniel Domscheit-Berg, a one-time WikiLeaks spokesman who has grown estranged from Assange, said in an interview he was contacted by the German federal police in October 2017 and told that U.S. authorities wished to talk to him "about the Manning-Julian connection." He also received a March 2018 letter repeating the request from then-U. S. Attorney in the Eastern District, Dana Boente.

He said the German police told him the FBI was interested in "what possible contact - possible coordination'' occurred between Assange and Manning, he said. The Americans appeared to be interested in "possible solicitation" by Assange of Manning, he said.

Domscheit-Berg told the German police he was not interested in speaking to the FBI.

This article was written by Ellen Nakashima and Rachel Weiner, reporters for The Washington Post.

Read the original post:
Chelsea Manning subpoenaed to testify before grand jury in ...

Chelsea Manning subpoenaed by grand jury, likely over past …

Activist and whistleblower Chelsea Manning has been subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury, though the summons makes no mention of what she will be questioned about.

The former Army intelligence analyst, convicted in 2013 of leaking military and diplomatic documents to WikiLeaks, has stated she will fight the subpoena. Her legal team is expected to file a motion to quash on Friday morning on constitutional grounds.

Given what is going on, I am opposing this, she told The New York Times.

I want to be very forthright I have been subpoenaed. I dont know the parameters of the subpoena apart from that I am expected to appear. I dont know what Im going to be asked.

Recently, prosecutors inadvertently revealed that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been formally charged under seal in the Eastern District of Virginia, the same district in which Mannings subpoena was issued. She has not stated whether she will cooperate should her motion fail.

US attorney for the Eastern District, Gordon D Kromberg, who successfully argued that the charges levelled against Julian Assange remain secret despite the inadvertent revelation, told her lawyers only that the subpoena was in relation to her past statements.

Its disappointing but not surprising that the government is continuing to pursue criminal charges against Julian Assange, apparently for his role in uncovering and providing the public truthful information about matters of great public interest, said Barry Pollack, a lawyer on Assanges legal team.

Assange remains holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London where he has lived in political exile since 2012. Former President Obama commuted, not pardoned, Mannings sentence in 2017, with Manning having served less than four years of her original 35-year sentence.

Critics have denounced the Trump administrations newly-revealed pursuit of charges against Assange after his predecessor opted not to tread into murky waters regarding press freedoms protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Here is the original post:
Chelsea Manning subpoenaed by grand jury, likely over past ...

Chelsea Manning: digital witness | Dazed

At a time when trans rights are more under threat than ever, thespring 2019issue of Dazed takes a stand for the global creativity of the LGBTQIA+ communities and infinite forms of identity.You can pre-order a copy of our latest issuehere, and see the whole Infinite Identities campaign here.

Chelsea Manningis wearing big black leather boots. She has been wearing Dr. Martens ever since her release from military prison in 2017. Fixed forever in a legacy of countercultural action, the shoes are a fitting uniform for the whistleblower responsible for the largest transmission of classified military documents in American history.

Manning is slender and small, standing just 5ft 2in with a crop of light blonde hair tucked easily behind her ears. On this December day, she is at a New York branch of The Wing, the bustling millennial womens club. Dim-pink and polished, with conference rooms dedicated to women of history, the building is full of professional, feminist-minded women of a certain disposition, eyes forward, fixed on private computer screens. Chelsea Manning stands out as a member, sheathed in black pants and a long-sleeved shirt, with dark eyeliner.

Two years ago,Manning was in a cell in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, her hair cut by force, serving a 35-year prison sentence after being convicted on 19 charges, including six counts of espionage. She had been in custody for nearly seven years, since 2010, and throughout that time endured treatment deemed cruel, inhuman and degrading by the United Nations.

As an intelligence analyst for the US military working outside of Baghdad, Iraq, Manning exposed American subterfuge against its own citizens, and the killing of Iraqi civilians; an infamous video shows an Apache helicopter shooting them down. In court, Manning described a kind of delightful bloodlust in the soldiers voices. With then-President-Elect Trump poised to take power, Manning was released, her sentence reduced to time-served by President Obama as he readied to depart the office forever. It was a shock to all sides: represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, Manning had fought for her freedom but, given the extreme controversy of her actions, it was hard to believe President Obama would actually have her released.

By that time, Mannings identity had long been absorbed into her political image. The world had come to know a kind of Chelsea Manning the icon, the hero, the villain, the symbol but, whichever version you saw, it was never the real one. Never Manning free from prison. Never Manning outside of a cage. That history surrounds her; sitting in a corner of this quiet but packed room in New York today, she is The Chelsea Manning. And yet, no one is watching, no one whispering into a sisters ear. She seems almost encrypted, able to hide herself if necessary.

And then she is rising from her seat, greeting me, doing another interview. Why did you do the things? says Manning, mimicking the redundant questions she is most often subjected to by the media, questions which have become painful through endless repetition. These parts of my life are over. This is definitely something I share with a lot of former prisoners; we dont like to bring up our time in prison and the things that got us in there. Its really hard.

Also, around the time of her arrest, Manning was moving on from her life as a man. Its difficult to move forward in your life when the rest of the world is still attached to the part youve left behind.

There are some people who call me a hero. But things are worse now. Even worse than they were in 2010 Chelsea Manning

So, what else?

Im a clubber, Manning says, with a heartwarming smile. Were squeezed into a phone booth, because none of the conference rooms are available. Her manager, also a trans woman, is sitting cross-legged on the floor.Chelseas now-managerwrote to her when she was in prison; when she was released, the pen-pals became close friends and established a professional relationship. Aside from overthrowing industrial complexes, they both like electronic music, a lot. Manning describes it as a core aspect of her life since childhood.

Its what made Hackers, the 1995 cult classic with Angelina Jolie, a good film for her, despite lacking any sort of technical accuracy. (The mechanics were terrible, says Manning, as elitist and critical of depictions of coding culture as a fashion editor might be of, say, low-rise jeans.) I was a genderqueer kid out in the middle of nowhere, so it was a different world, says Manning, explaining how electronic music in the 1990s worked as a vital pathway to digital space, where she found solace. At the time, she says, the online realm was an unexplored frontier populated only by nerds, but it was an alternate universe that she needed desperately. I understood this world intuitively.

Today, Manning is known for being particularly adept at using Twitter. Her tweets tend to take aim at whatever topic has caught her attention, and are inscribed with a signature, glorious combination of emojis that somehow perfectly articulate complex political issues. People think about my use of emojis and Im just like, Ive been doing this since the mid-90s, Manning deadpans, flexing her decades of experience in chatrooms and web forums. Like, Ive been doing text-based emojis and emoticons since AOL messenger. This isnt new; I didnt just discover the emoji keyboard.

Lately, however, Manning has been tweeting less. For her, spending too much time online, or tangled up in Twitter, can incite a sense of isolation and impending, inescapable destruction. The media, inextricable from the wider Twitter discourse, is just as unhealthy. It creates these discrete stories which were bombarded with constantly, says Manning, leaning back on her stool. Everything feels like its chaos, and its designed to be this way... Thats one reason why Ive taken a step back from social media, because it really engages with this, and its a continuum. Its bombarding our senses with this (idea) that we are alone and overwhelmed.

Manning pauses, and though the light in the booth is dim, I can see the tears well in her eyes. Her voice heightens, breaking briefly as she continues her thread on social media and its discontents. It feels like your world is ending, she says, maintaining that, while we all might feel alone and overwhelmed with the current age of digital anxiety, things dont have to be this way. If we just take a step away from our screens and realise we have communities, then we might be able to build up, and fight back.

Speaking at colleges, and organising with chapters of various activist circles in cities across the country, Manning is lending her voice to a number of social movements. Last summer, she ran for Senate in the Democratic primary in Maryland, where she lost. Even when groups are suppressed, theres still the chance of survival, she reflects, perhaps drawing on her years of hopeless incarceration: her two survived suicide attempts at Fort Leavenworth military prison; the two months after she was taken into custody, when she was held in an eight-foot wire cage in Kuwait; and all that time spent advocating for herself and a future that was anything but certain. Shes here now, walking the streets of New York City, eating pizza with her friends, travelling to meet new ones.

Theres the chance of support, Manning says, insisting on community resistance as a vital resource. She sometimes attends court hearings; recently, she sat in court for people who had been arrested in Washington protesting a college appearance of white-supremacist leader Richard Spencer. It feels overwhelming when youre in that and youre alone, but knowing that you have a community behind you, a community that loves you and will show up for you even travel to visit your court hearings means the world. It meant the world to me.

The US is often referred to as being split in two politically, particularly since the rise of Donald Trump to the presidency. Manning emerged from prison into that polarised reality, and she has been part of a movement against hatred, and supremacy of all kinds, ever since. Her friends who protested Richard Spencer may have been speaking out against his nationalist beliefs, but, on the other side of the aisle, conservatives have suggested that such protest is an affront to the first amendment itself.

To Manning, the difference is obvious; while people are entitled to believe and say whatever they want in the US, they are not entitled to a platform. Free speech isnt, I hand you a microphone and you get to say whatever you want to say, she explains. Thats not how it works. This connects more broadly to the idea, increasingly prevalent in public life, that all discourse is valuable, or that we can entertain a diversity of beliefs even when those beliefs impact the lives of marginalised peoples.

There are a lot of people who I strongly disagree with, and I dont show up and shut them down... Where I draw the line is when the implications of what youre saying, even though you might not explicitly be saying it, are the elimination of entire groups of people from society. For example, I cant debate with a trans-exclusionary radical feminist, because they want me to not exist... You dont hand them a microphone or give them a stage. If they do get one, then guess what? People are gonna show up and shut them down, because we are threatened, and if they get to debate and they win, we dont get to be around any more.

Its this kind of real-world engagement that drives Manning today. The internet has a purpose, but it has changed over time. Twitter used to be a portal that connected people separated by labyrinthian politics and social disarray. No longer. Theyve altered their algorithms, says Manning. A tweet for Occupy had a lot more mileage than a (similar) tweet would in 2019... As institutions tweets become more (favoured by the algorithms), its drowning people out. Those people tend to be the most vulnerable, the marginalised.

Activism is not tweeting. Were no longer at the point where we need to talk about what the issues are, we already know what they are, says Manning. She is a serious woman, with a palpable sense of urgency and purpose about her. Her words are assured, her voice limber and clear which may be necessary, as she is often using her platform to distil complex political conundrums into comprehensible terms. There is a programme operating, some line of code running, perfectly in her mind.

You know, there are some people who call me a hero, says Manning quietly, critically. They say the leaks changed this, and they accomplished these things. But things are worse now. Even worse than they were in 2010. She was driven to act when she felt the US government was operating without transparency, acting on the international stage without the nations consent or knowledge. The conditions that drove Manning to transmit hundreds of thousands of military documents to WikiLeaks in 2010 havent been rectified: in fact, she says, they have now intensified, accelerated and metastasised on a grand scale.

I spent my first few weeks out of prison here in New York, and it was then that I really realised, says Manning, recalling an epiphany about the simmering unrest being felt around the country at the time of her release. Ive been in an occupied military situation, you know, Ive been an occupying power in a combat zone, and when I see the police force I see the same things, the same mentality, the same sort of wartime footing among the police in certain communities. Its the same thing.

Its a revealing insight into the way in which Manning views the world. Instead of discrete problems, she sees strains of the same disease flowering in different forms, in different places. There was a green zone in Iraq where the privileged would live, she says, offering an example. But there were also the sort of red zones outside. Its very similar here; if you go out into the non-gentrified communities in Brooklyn or in any other city I spent time in Baltimore, for example the police feels like its on a wartime footing. Its not just increased presence, its the aggressiveness of the presence. Weve moved away from walking beat-cops to cops on patrol in a vehicle, with body armour and weapons. She describes a pipeline connecting the two, from weapons once used in war now used by the police domestically, to former Iraq and Afghanistan-deployed military working in law enforcement.

Despite these feelings of vulnerability, today Manning is living a life of independence for the first time. She had a difficult childhood, and a transition into adulthood that was confined within a military regime, loaded with the same principles that informed her experience before service: an empire of the west, of whiteness, of heterosexuality, of a gender construct that corrected individuality with violence. It is the continuum that links one thing to the next. She is still learning who she is as a free woman, and how to move beyond the symbolic Chelsea Manning who is worshipped and reviled in equal measure.

Ive been an occupying power in a combat zone, and when I see the police force I see the same things, the same mentality, the same wartime footing Chelsea Manning

Im never gonna live up to everybodys expectations in this regard, says Manning. Its exhausting. I fuck up; I mess up a lot in my life in general, and thats just like basic stuff. Basic life things Ive had to learn. I never had my own place. In the last year Ive lived on my own for the first time, learning how to build credit, how to have an apartment, how to pay rent on time, how to consistently clean. Part of that process is coming to terms with the person she has been. Being part of the occupation in Iraq, for instance, stands in stark contrast to her politics today. I had a very abstract perception of it, Manning says now of the conflict. It is clearly something she has spent a long time processing. Here in the US, working domestically before I deployed, I was able to separate everything, and it wasnt even really a political issue to me. I almost felt like, This is my job like, this is what Im good at. Im good at math, Im good at numbers, Im just gonna math the shit out of these problems.

Once I was on the ground, experiencing that cognitive dissonance between what we were doing and what we said we were doing, and also what I thought I was trained for versus the clusterfuck that I was a part of... It was almost like whenever Obama got elected, it changed everything but it didnt change anything at all, substantively. It doesnt matter whos president: either its a warmer and friendlier police state, or its outright fascism. Those are your options. Once you start to see the machine working, it can wake you up, but I hadnt put the threads together yet. Maybe there was no way I could have known beforehand, but I certainly feel that sense of, I should have known.

Manning feels keenly responsible for the decisions that she made, but she keeps her perspective forward-focused. You cant go back and change things, she says, her eyes glinting again in the low light. It seems now, in this moment, like she might be somewhere else. Maybe she is back in basic training in Fort Leonard Wood in the Missouri Ozarks, or at Fort Drum in upstate New York, dating her old boyfriend, Tyler. Perhaps she is a child again, or maybe shes already been deployed to a remote site in the Iraqi desert, and is downloading classified data to a disc labelled Lady Gaga. Wherever she went, she returns quickly.

Theres not a lot of ruminating on these kind of things, Manning explains. I try not to re-litigate every single decision that Ive made in my entire life, and that includes decisions such as, Should I have stayed at Starbucks in 2007?, Should I have got that job in 2008? and Should I have kept on dating Tyler? All these different decisions are important to me in how I view my life, but those arent the questions people ask me about.

I first considered transitioning at 18, Manning continues, elaborating on one of those past choices. It was daunting, and I did the opposite: I went into the military. These kinds of things are very emotionally weighted for me, so I just have to move on.

Manning is free today or, as she might say, as free as anyone can be. Her transition is progressing outside of prison, where she has access to more resources and tools to live her life unconfined by a cage or the prison of a body that feels broken. We know who she has been, but who will Chelsea Manning become in the years ahead, through these times of social unrest and political turmoil? What does she want in her life, for her future?

I want to be able to feel comfortable, says Manning, looking away as she speaks. I really wonder what next years gonna look like for me and my friends. She is a figure in black, motionless, casting her gaze forward, trying to see beyond the dark horizon. I want to be able to answer that question.

Hair Tomi Kono at Julian Watson Agency, make-up Asami Matsuda at Artlist NY using La Prairie, photography assistants Jon Ervin, Mike Feswick, Merimon Hart, styling assistants Rhiarn Schuck, Marcus Cuffie, hair assistant Beth Shanefelter, production Carly Hoff at Webber

Original post:
Chelsea Manning: digital witness | Dazed

Chelsea Manning About to Steal the Show as Cover Person for …

Society

20:04 12.02.2019Get short URL

Born Bradley Edward Manning, the whistleblower claimed to have a female gender identity in 2013 while doing time in prison for disclosing a trove of sensitive documents to WikiLeaks.

Famous whistleblower and 2018 US Senate candidate Chelsea Manning will be the cover star ofthe 2019 spring issue ofthe Dazed British style magazine, which will be dedicated to talking aboutthe global creativity and power ofLGBTQIA+ communities.

So far, Dazed has revealed only two other cover stars ofthis so called Infinity Identities issue besideManning, withLGBT rights activist and transgender model Hunter Schafer and Ariel Nicholson, a 17-year-old transgender "model ofthe hour", landing the features.

"Throughout this whole week, Dazed Digital will be running a campaign that explores LGBTQIA+ rights more broadly, throughthe personal and political," the magazines website announced.

However, a number ofsocial media users didnt seem toagree withthe magazines reasoning or approve ofMannings appearance.

Manning (born Bradley Edward Manning) spent seven years behindbars afterblowing the whistle onthe United States conducting extrajudicial killings inIraq and Afghanistan, turning over700,000 documents toWikiLeaks in2009 and 2010.

READ MORE: Everythings Gotten Worse: Chelsea Manning Slams Worsening Security State

While inprison, Manning released a statement in2013, claiming tohave a female gender identity sincechildhood and expressing his preference ofbeing known asChelsea Manning.

Manning's 35-year sentence was commuted bythen-US President Barack Obama atthe end ofhis term inJanuary 2017, leaving prison that May.

Read the original here:
Chelsea Manning About to Steal the Show as Cover Person for ...

Chelsea Manning, Alleged Wikileaks Whistleblower Released …

Chelsea Manning, the first convicted source to Wikileaks is free from prison as of a few hours ago. After an intensive 7 year fight and a huge 35-year sentence set to be served, Manning walks freely from the Fort Leavenworth military prison today. Bringing an end to one of the most controversial criminal cases in American history over the leaking of classified government secrets.

Manning, a military analyst convicted for allegedly turning over classified information from the military to Wikileaks, received an unprecedented 35-year prison sentence during her original trial back in 2013. After spending 7 years behind bars, she was acquitted amid President Barak Obama, after he commuted a bulk of Mannings sentence just before leaving office.

Nor the military nor Mannings legal team released any information on her immediate plans. The military had disallowed reporters from waiting near the gate to the prison barracks. Manning has said that she intends to live in Maryland, near family, once everything settles, taking the next few weeks to adjust. Mannings support network has also raised her an additional $147,000 via a GoFundMe campaign to help her get started.

To celebrate Chelseas release and ensure her safety, she posted the following on her personal Twitter:

Chelsea Manning is the first ever alleged Wikileaks source to have been identified and harshly prosecuted, she is also the first ever alleged Wikileaks source to be released from prison. While she was convicted on charges of leaking classified military documents to Wikileaks, the whistleblowing publication has never revealed a single source, never commenting on the authenticity of the Manning claims.

Chelsea Manning, previously known as Pvt. Bradley Manning in 2010, was arrested on suspicion of having stolen hundreds of thousands of secret military and diplomatic files from a classified computer network, to which she had access to as an intelligence analyst. Three short years after her conviction, she revealed that she was a transgender woman, changing her name to Chelsea.

Mannings heroic actions brought light to a horrific trove of dark war secrets, including raw evidence of unknown civilian killings in the Iraq war, back-room diplomatic dealings and discussion of local corruption around the world, and intelligence assessments about Guantanamo Bay detainees.

Even after being prosecuted under the judgment of her being a traitor, Chelsea has become an icon to anti-war and anti-secrecy activists around the globe. Her harsh treatment within numerous prison facilities and illegal holding sparked dozens on dozens of protests for her freedom. After a lengthy three-year trial, she was convicted of numerous violations of the Espionage act.

Following her 2013 conviction, Manning was taken to Fort Leavenworth to serve her sentence. There she publicly struggled with her transition from a male to a female in an all male military prison. Twice last year she tried to take her own life.

Chelsea Mannings release is monumental in nearly every digital community across the Internet. Free speech activists, Whistleblowers, Privacy activists among dozens of others are showing monumental support for her.

Welcome home Chelsea, its good to have a true hero back!!

For anyone that wants to help Chelsea Manning, you can donate to her directly via her GoFundMe Page here.

More:
Chelsea Manning, Alleged Wikileaks Whistleblower Released ...

Chelsea Manning to Be Released Early as Obama Commutes …

Speaker Paul D. Ryan called it outrageous. President Obama now leaves in place a dangerous precedent that those who compromise our national security wont be held accountable for their crimes, he said in a statement.

But in a joint statement, Nancy Hollander and Vince Ward two lawyers who have been representing Ms. Manning in appealing her conviction and sentence, and who filed the commutation application praised the decision.

Ms. Manning is the longest-serving whistle-blower in the history of the United States, they said. Her 35-year sentence for disclosing information that served the public interest and never caused harm to the United States was always excessive, and were delighted that justice is being served in the form of this commutation.

In recent days, the White House had signaled that Mr. Obama was seriously considering granting Ms. Mannings commutation application, in contrast to a pardon application submitted on behalf of the other large-scale leaker of the era, Edward J. Snowden, the former intelligence contractor who disclosed archives of top-secret surveillance files and is living as a fugitive in Russia.

Asked about the two clemency applications on Friday, the White House spokesman, Josh Earnest, discussed the pretty stark difference between Ms. Mannings case for mercy and Mr. Snowdens. While their offenses were similar, he said, there were some important differences.

Chelsea Manning is somebody who went through the military criminal justice process, was exposed to due process, was found guilty, was sentenced for her crimes, and she acknowledged wrongdoing, he said. Mr. Snowden fled into the arms of an adversary and has sought refuge in a country that most recently made a concerted effort to undermine confidence in our democracy.

Mr. Earnest also noted that while the documents Ms. Manning provided to WikiLeaks were damaging to national security, the ones Mr. Snowden disclosed were far more serious and far more dangerous. (None of the documents Ms. Manning disclosed were classified above the merely secret level.)

Ms. Manning was still known as Bradley Manning when she deployed with her unit to Iraq in late 2009. There, she worked as a low-level intelligence analyst helping her unit assess insurgent activity in the area it was patrolling, a role that gave her access to a classified computer network.

See the rest here:
Chelsea Manning to Be Released Early as Obama Commutes ...

Chelsea Manning, Once Sentenced To 35 Years, Walks Free After …

Army Pvt. Chelsea Manning was released Wednesday from Fort Leavenworth, a military prison in Kansas. In January, then-President Barack Obama commuted Manning's 35-year prison sentence after she requested clemency. Charlie Riedel/AP hide caption

Army Pvt. Chelsea Manning was released Wednesday from Fort Leavenworth, a military prison in Kansas. In January, then-President Barack Obama commuted Manning's 35-year prison sentence after she requested clemency.

Army Pvt. Chelsea Manning has left a military prison in Kansas and returned to civilian life Wednesday, seven years after being taken into custody for what is seen as the largest leak of classified data in U.S. history.

"After another anxious four months of waiting, the day has finally arrived," Manning said in a statement released by the American Civil Liberties Union. "I am looking forward to so much! Whatever is ahead of me is far more important than the past. I'm figuring things out right now which is exciting, awkward, fun, and all new for me."

Manning tweeted a photo of her sneaker-clad feet, taking her "first steps of freedom" Wednesday morning.

The 35-year prison term Manning received as punishment for leaking thousands of military and State Department documents to WikiLeaks in 2010 was described as unprecedented when it was handed down. Before he left office, President Barack Obama shortened the sentence to about seven years.

After Manning's release, her lawyer at the ACLU, Chase Strangio, said, "Through extended periods of solitary confinement and up against the government's insistence on denying her medical care and existence as a woman, Chelsea has emerged with grace, resilience, and an inspiring amount of love for others."

In court, Manning pleaded guilty to leaking secret information but she was acquitted of the most serious charge, aiding the enemy, in July 2013.

On the morning of Manning's release, a fundraising campaign for her post-release expenses met its goal of raising $150,000. In a related campaign, musicians Thurston Moore and Talib Kweli are among more than 30 acts on a benefit album that was released this week, with the proceeds going to Manning.

Military personnel at the prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., where Manning was held had not provided many details about her release that was scheduled for Wednesday. Members of Manning's support team also provided little information, citing her need for privacy and time to adjust. They've said she plans to live in Maryland, where she has family.

Manning's court-martial conviction is under appeal; her current status is classified as a special type of active duty, The Associated Press reports, meaning that "she will be unpaid but will be legally entitled to military medical care," the wire service says, citing an Army spokeswoman.

Among the records Manning has admitted to passing on to WikiLeaks were a video showing a 2007 U.S. Apache helicopter attack in Baghdad that killed 11 men and 750,000 classified documents that contained military and diplomatic dispatches.

The 35-year sentence Manning, seen here in an undated handout photo, originally received was described as unprecedented when it was handed down. AP hide caption

The 35-year sentence Manning, seen here in an undated handout photo, originally received was described as unprecedented when it was handed down.

Rights groups have sharply criticized the way the government handled Manning's case; they also faulted the official response to what Amnesty International USA calls "possible war crimes committed by the military" that are depicted in the records she released.

"Chelsea's treatment is especially galling given that nobody has been held accountable for the alleged crimes that she brought to light," says Margaret Huang, executive director of Amnesty International USA. "While we celebrate her freedom, we will continue to call for an independent investigation into the potential human rights violations she exposed, and for protections to be put in place to ensure whistleblowers like Chelsea are never again subjected to such appalling treatment."

Arrested in 2010, Manning had been serving in Iraq and was known as Bradley Manning. After the conviction, Manning announced she was a transgender woman and changed her name to Chelsea. A day after commuting Manning's sentence, Obama said at his final press conference that he felt justice had been served:

"It has been my view that given she went to trial, that due process was carried out, that she took responsibility for her crime, that the sentence that she received was very disproportional disproportionate relative to what other leakers had received, and that she had served a significant amount of time, that it made it sense to commute and not pardon her sentence."

Steven Nelson of U.S. News and World Report talked to NPR's All Things Considered on Sunday:

"Part of the reason that the White House justified granting her clemency was because it was so much longer than other recent leak sentences. In a lot of the cases, people plead guilty and get maybe a year in prison. But 35 years really shocked people. And the seven years that had already been served was seen as enough by the Obama White House."

Nelson also told host Mary Louise Kelly that there's a difference between Manning's case and that of Edward Snowden, the former NSA contractor, who leaked information.

"Manning as a 22-year-old wanted to spark a broad worldwide discussion of various injustices she perceived in scandals, whereas Snowden who had access to more highly classified documents had a very specific policy debate he wanted to start about surveillance. And he left the country, rather than be arrested.

"When the Obama administration was preparing to grant Manning clemency, they drew the distinction that Manning had faced trial, that Manning had expressed some degree of contrition. Snowden, of course, is totally unrepentant, feels he did the right thing. So that's a real distinction. He hasn't been tried, he's not sorry, and Manning was both."

While in prison, Manning had to transition as a woman in a male military facility. She has tried to commit suicide twice.

But since her impending release was announced, Manning's outlook has brightened. Last week, she released a statement saying:

"For the first time, I can see a future for myself as Chelsea. I can imagine surviving and living as the person who I am and can finally be in the outside world. Freedom used to be something that I dreamed of but never allowed myself to fully imagine. Now, freedom is something that I will again experience with friends and loved ones after nearly seven years of bars and cement, of periods of solitary confinement, and of my health care and autonomy restricted, including through routinely forced haircuts. I am forever grateful to the people who kept me alive, President Obama, my legal team and countless supporters.

"I watched the world change from inside prison walls and through the letters that I have received from veterans, trans young people, parents, politicians and artists. My spirits were lifted in dark times, reading of their support, sharing in their triumphs, and helping them through challenges of their own. I hope to take the lessons that I have learned, the love that I have been given, and the hope that I have to work toward making life better for others."

Read the original here:
Chelsea Manning, Once Sentenced To 35 Years, Walks Free After ...