Explainer: ‘Anonymous’ unleashes Twitter storm with George Floyd claims, but who’re they? – The New Indian Express

Online Desk

"Activist/hacktivist collective" Anonymous has taken Twitter by a storm after the recent Minneapolis police brutality that led to the murder of George Floyd shook the world's conscience.

The group that has caused quite a stir, took to Twitter and other social media platformsa week ago to condemn the murder of 47-year-old Floyd, who died afteran officer knelt on hisneck even as he gasped for breath, sparkingwidespread protests across the US, curfews in major cities and also led to the US President Donald Trump taking refuge in a White House bunker as tensions escalated.

But, first things first.

What/whoexactly is 'Anonymous'?

'Anonymous'claims to be a"decentralisedinternational hactivist movement"that originated in 2003 and has conducted many digitalexposes since then, much to the discomfiture of governments and influential people.

It has now re-emerged with a series of tweet threads and videos from its unverified Twitter handles, which were quick to go viral -- especially those on the George Floydcase wherein a figurewearing aGuy Fawkes mask,(portrayed in the popular dystopian novel and Hollywood film 'V for Vendetta') spoke about how racial inequality masked as police brutality has affected the United States for a long time.

Police brutality and murder is a widespread problem in the United States, which has undoubtedly infected nearly every jurisdiction in the country.

"But, the Minneapolis police department is among the worst and has a horrible track record of violence and corruption. This weeks brutal killing of George Floyd, which has sparked protests and national outrage, is just the tip of the iceberg in a long list of high-profile cases of wrongful deaths at the hands of officers in your state, they appeared saying.

The impact of the clip was far-reaching and it went on to garner over 37 million views despite being pulled down by social media sites multiple times. Word was quick to spread and netizens, who were already enraged and hadbeen incessantly protesting under the banner of 'Black Lives Matter',demanding accountabilitywere instantly intrigued.

But George Floyd's isn't the first cop brutality case to catch theireye.

In 2014, Anonymoushackedthe City Hall website of Ferguson, Missouri, after the fatal shooting of 18-year-old black teen Michael Brown, threatening more action if the protestors were hurt. They also releasedthe name of the officer they deemed responsible, a claim the police denied.

Later that year, Anonymous also released information on 12-year-old African-American teenager Tamir Rice's shooter.

This time too they did something similar by allegedly disablingthe Minneapolis police department website for a while andleaking the email addresses and passwords of the officers.

But, let's backtrack a bit.Is thisAnonymous' modus operandi? For that, a quick look at some of its past activities.

Claim to fame

Some of the most notable actionsthat grabbed eyeballs include:

Operation Chanology (2008) - In 2008, Anonymous attacked the Church of Scientology after a video of celebrity Tom Cruise surfaced online praising his faiththatthe Church wanted taken down. Viewing this as internet censorship, they adapted measures like distributeddenial-of-service attacks(DDoS)prank calls, and other means to disrupt the church's services such as investigating its tax exemption status in the US with the help of the Internal Revenue Service. Anonymous has also openly advocated against homophobia and lashed out at Churches that advocated it.

Operation Payback (2010) - Anonymous, which had openly pledged its support toWikiLeaks (an NPO that released classified data), was believed to be responsible for the attack onMasterCard andPayPal after they frozeWikiLeaks' accounts, shut down its servers and refused to engage in business with them as the US government raised objections. It had taken down both sites of MasterCard and Visa, declaring"war" on behalf of Jullian Assange (founder of WikiLeaks)that year.

Revolutionary movements across globe(2011-12)-The collective heavily supported protest movements in Tunisia (OpTunisia) when Arab Spring engulfed the nation with similar DDoS style attacks on government websites and by mobilising crowds after circulating relevant information.

Arrests of 'members' -Apart from this, many people, who claimed to plead allegiance to Anonymous have been arrested for alleged involvement in cyberattacks on behalf of them in countries like India, UK, Turkey, US, The Netherlands and Spain but no concrete links could ever be traced back to them.

OpParis (2015) - Anonymous attacked the Islamic State under its #OpParis campaignafter the Paris Charlie Hebdo terror massacre. On January 12, they brought down a website that was suspected to belong to one of these groups and claimed to shut down over1,000 Twitter accounts linked to the terrorist outfit in 2015.

Alright, but how do they recruit people andwhat is their ideology?

One doesn't really know. The collective has not endorsed any political ideology or stance although most of its activities point toward a revolutionary orientation. Mobilisation of people who can speak truth to power seemsto be the agenda - one that they seek to achieve via cyberwars and attacks.

Resurgence with George Floyd

Cut to June 2020, the collective seems to be focussed on providing updates and information to the protestors as they are still continuing their battle in various cities like New Yorkand other places across the globeeven as Floyd willbe buried on June 9 in Houston, Texas.

On Twitter, Anonymous' comebackwasenough to gainthe collective's multiple accounts over 5 million followers each, all in under two days, as more revelations were promised and accountability from authorities demanded.

There may be a slight calm now but with the storm that they havealready unleashed, it's certain that they aren'tgoing away any time soon.

Go here to read the rest:
Explainer: 'Anonymous' unleashes Twitter storm with George Floyd claims, but who're they? - The New Indian Express