Why Pepsi and United Got It So Wrong – Daily Beast

The big thumb of corporatism left two of Americas most iconic companies completely blind to their own missteps.

What do Americas tone-deaf twins, Pepsi and United, tell us about whats wrong with corporate leadership today?

For anyone who wasnt in the Hermit Kingdom for the last two weeks, we had back-to-back incidents of self-inflicted social slaughter. First, Pepsi had to yank its fatally-conceived commercial featuring Kendall Jenner handing a can of the sugary stuff to a fake cop, a gesture which was almost universally seen as trivializing the Black Lives Matter movement through an unjustifiable apotheosis of the brand as a cultural peacemaker. Then, United Airline sent real cops onto a plane to yank a paying customer out of his seatand the CEOs initial reaction was to defend the ejection maneuver.

Deconstruct these two seemingly disparate disasters and what emerges is a surprising continuitybroken management was trapped in a one-dimensional view of the landscape, when we are living in a multi-dimensional Rubiks cube.

What blinded Pepsi? The existential imperative to be emotionally connected to their consumers; the brandosphere is filled with talk about how products must be culturally relevant to prosper today. The decision to insert Pepsi into the conversation about Black Lives Matter came from that place, but ended up in a horrible spot because they looked to the past for their model, and misread the lessons.

That past was 36 years ago, and also the pivot point of the final episode of Mad Men. In that reality-bending moment, the fictional Don Draper is credited with creating one of the most memorable commercials of capitalist history. As the Hollywood Reporter wrote: The last scenesfeature Don hugging a stranger at a retreat and meditating with hippies before the episode cuts to the 1971 Coca-Cola Hilltop commercial.

This commercialwhich captured a group of young, earnest global citizens gathered on a mountaintop in Italy, singing a folk-tinged anthem, was such a beloved statement of unity during a divisive time that the anthemic score, I want buy the world a Coke morphed into a popular song retitled I want to teach the world to sing.

Some context: Just a year earlier, in 1970, the Kent State shootings and the invasion of Cambodia rended the nation. That was only three short years after the assassinations of Martin Luther King Jr. and Bobby Kennedy. The hated draft was in place; there were 334,000 troops in Vietnam; the Pentagon Papers were published. All in the Family, that breakthrough bottling of the zeitgeist, premiered in 1971.

It sure seemed like the right time for a soft drink to be a national healer. Pepsis own retraction confirms this parallel ambition; they wrote Pepsi was trying to project a global message of unity, peace and understanding. Clearly we missed the mark

They missed the mark because their rush to relevance blinded them to a literalized, conceptual disaster. Compared to Coke, the Pepsi spot was a ham-handed check of every box, down to the hijab-wearing photographer. This scene-by-scene breakdown in the Washington Post is a triumphant take-down, walking us through to the conclusory locus of the mockeryKendall Jenner handing her Pepsi to the stone-faced young policeman. Which led to the most devastating response of all, a tweet from Bernice KingIf only Daddy had known about the power of #Pepsijuxtaposed with a shot of her father being strong-armed by a state trooper.

Pepsi defaulted to every risible trope of lifestyle advertisingquick cuts of cool people in prettified urban environmentsgentrification on steroids, another level of cultural insensitivity. And the entire staging of the protest felt unbearably fake and inauthentic; just a lot of beautiful people in a celebratory mode, badly feigning political fire. They could have been on their way to a sample sale.

Cokes spot was elegantly allusive, requiring no visual telegraphing. It was celebrity-free and modest. As Giep Franzen wrote in the The Science and Art of Branding, its meaning of universal brotherhood is immediately understood without any announcer proclaiming the obvious. It was a plaintive cri de coeur in a troubled time, a hymnal that well-masked its commercial intent.

Just how hard was it to anticipate the firestorm of criticism? Only management that feels threatened to the bone could be so struthiousand Pepsis business is decaying in real time. Coke and Pepsi are facing a terrifying reality, is how Business Insider put it. Under that one-dimensional pressure, desperately seeking relevance wins over common sense.

Thank You!

You are now subscribed to the Daily Digest and Cheat Sheet. We will not share your email with anyone for any reason

Uniteds blindness came from a different kind of hyper-focus. When Oscar Munoz first defended his employees actions after dragging a bloodied Dr. Dao off the planeand then doubled down on that supporthe was trapped in a disastrous recursive paradigm. He pitted his employee manual against his consumers. A zero-sum spiral to the bottom.

Pepsis leaders were unable to see out of their own relevance obsession; Uniteds were locked in an obsession with process, unable to react to what everyone else saw was just plain wrong.

Munoz finally struck the right chord in his belated apology, where he said that a system failure created a horrific situation where the company didnt provide the right tools or resources to allow Uniteds front-line managers to use their common sense. In other words, the airline didnt liberate its employees to act humanely and intelligently.

Which is all that matters. We want the people we interact withUnited employees, telemarketing automatato come off the script and live in the world of Sesame Street fairness. Thats the same animating impulse behind todays populist surge; we dont want to be ground down by the big thumb of corporatism. The applies whether its the fabrication of a grandiose commercial that clumsily attempts to win our coolness approval without realizing the offensiveness of the content. Or whether its a WWE smack-down example of bureaucratic brutality. This is one domain where non-partisan rage prevails.

Generalization alert: Are we creating a generation of leadership who can operate fluidly and intuitively in this new multiverse, where you must unlearn (at least) half the things youre taught in business school, where 100 million people in China will view a video of Combat in Coach and crush your enterprise value because its easier to express their frustration on United than Beijing? Do the people in charge understand they arent talking to interest groups or clusters or cohorts but raw and ready individuals? Do they know how to create and assess a new calculus of consequences?

I doubt it. There are real questions as to whether modern leaders, despite being surrounded by phalanxes of expertsor perhaps because of itare well-suited to succeed in this dimensional, crazy-faceted modern world. Unfriendly skies ahead.

Originally posted here:

Why Pepsi and United Got It So Wrong - Daily Beast