Training bond schemes misused by employers to exploit workers – Newsroom

JUNE 2, 2021 Updated 15 hours ago

Employment

Last week a major McDonald's franchisee lost four restaurants for asking staff to sign illegal bonded labour agreements. But training bond schemes are more common than you would think because sometimes they're actually legal.

Bonded labour or forced labour sounds like it should be completely illegal,and it is for the most part.

But in some cases, employers can use legitimate training bond schemes to ensure their investment in a worker is paid off.

However, the issue isemployers are misusing legitimate training bond schemes to illegally secure workers intoterm agreements.

What do you think?Click here to comment.

Dundas Street Employment Law partnerRosamund Webby says training bond agreements,colloquially known as "bonding arrangements"are not uncommon.

Typically these training bond scheme involve acompany paying for the training of a legitimate course or apprenticeship under the premise the worker will be bonded to that employerfor certain period it could be a year, or a year and half.

However, Webby says,these arrangements tend normally to be in respect of added extras to the actual employment.

"Such as expensive professional development or training in things that arent actually required to competently perform the basic job an employee is employed to undertake."

Start your day with a curation of our top stories in your inbox

Start your day with a curation of our top stories in your inbox

She says generally, the amount thats repayable also reduces the longer the employee remains in employment.

What is not allowed and in breach of the Wage Protection Act is charging aworker or prospective employee a premium for giving them employment.

In the case of McDonald's former franchisee owner Prakash Hira asked staff topay him $3000 total as a bond agreement for the entire hiring/on boarding & training cost, and for time spent throughout the onboarding processes such as orientation/follow up orientation, training plans and time spent training, uniform costs as well as several administrative costs.

Webby says all of these costs are incurred simply in employing and ensuring a person can perform the basic job.

They are not added bonus extras that the employer doesnt really need to offer.

Hence that contract isn't "worth the paper its written on", Webby says, as the arrangement is likely unlawful, and if its signed, it is likely to be entirely incapable of being enforced.

Workers' rights advocate Nathan Santessohas worked on thousands of exploitation cases and says while illegal training bonds are not common, about onein 20cases he deals involvesa dodgy bonded labour agreement.

He says they were especially common in industries like beauty and massage clinics.

Santesso says he is currently dealing with an employment dispute involving abeauty therapyworker bonded to her employment for two years over a sham training course on laser hair removal.

He says bonds are allowed if there is an actual qualification the employer is paying for, usually to a third party, for the worker to attend, such as flight training.

This protects the employer if the worker decides to take a free training course andleave without working.

Hospitality worker's advocate Chloe Ann King says vulnerable migrant workers whose visas are tied to their employers are often victims of illegal bonded labour arrangements.

"Workers are asked to pay a premium and given a false sense of hope about getting residency. It's totally cruel," Ann King says.

She says exploitative employers often think their contracts trump employment law.

According to MBIE,workers being asked to paypart or all their wages back to employers and payingpremiums for getting employment were among of the most common forms of migrant exploitation.

There have been calls from businesses and worker's advocatesfor the government to act fast on having a modern slavery law in New Zealand, like Australia, the United Statesand United Kingdom already have.

All three countries also have dedicated modern slavery laws, designed to make businesses report on the potential risks of forced labour in their supply chains and what they are doing to address them. New Zealand has no such legislation.

"Workers are asked to pay a premium and given a false sense of hope about getting residency. It's totally cruel." Chloe Ann King,Raise the Bar

Ann King says while this legislation is necessary, current employmentlaw took exploitation seriously. Employers who exploit migrants can be imprisoned for up to seven years and fined up to $100,000.

But the problem was, theLabour Inspectorate and the Employment Relations Authority, where employment disputes are heard, have been underfunded and did not have the resources to enforce the law.

She says both departments were overlooked in this year's Budget.

Disputes are facing up to two years of wait time before they are heard at the ERA due to a backlog of cases post-Covid.

As for Hira, the former owner of four McDonald's restaurants, the union representing the workers of his stores say it will not take further action against the company, Hira Corporation.

"We complained and head office acted quickly on the complaint and [Hira] lost his company. That's a win for us," Unite Union national director Mike Treen says.

More:

Training bond schemes misused by employers to exploit workers - Newsroom