Last week three judges of the Federal Court of Australia looked at Facebook and came away unimpressed.
In critical legal proceedings, the social networks US parent company Meta had tried to claim that it was not actually carrying out business in the country - despite it being used by an estimated 70 per cent of Australians.
Australia may be a minor market for Facebook, but it has already been hit with regulation here.Credit:Shutterstock
Facebook made the claim in an attempt to argue it couldnt even be served with legal documents from Australia for alleged privacy breaches from the Cambridge Analytica scandal, in which a shadowy political consultancy harvested Facebook data on millions of users to inform its strategies in 2014 and 2015.
According to the social media giant, its US-headquartered parent only conducted data processing services for Facebook Ireland Limited, which collects data from Australian citizens.
Which is all very convenient for Facebook, but not so much for the Australian Information Commissioner. The federal agency had brought the case alleging that 311,127 Australians had their personal data improperly disclosed in the saga, only to be met with Facebooks legal stonewall.
While their decision was only preliminary, allowing the case to proceed further, Justices Nye Perram, David Yates and Chief Justice James Allsop, took issue with Facebooks reasoning. Some of the companys claims, Justice Perram wrote, were divorced from reality.
Loading
The business is not about the simple sale of goods whether tangible or intangible, Allsop wrote. It is about extracting value from information about people.
Its not just Facebook. Transportation company Uber and games powerhouse Valve, known for titles like Half-Life and the digital game store Steam, have both claimed in recent years that their entities werent operating in Australia when they faced legal trouble.
Originally posted here:
Tech giants can claim theyre everywhere and nowhere, but its not smart - Sydney Morning Herald
