Post new comment

US public and foreign policy elites agree the nation should mind its own business

WASHINGTON: The global image of the United States as an advocate for development, multilateralism, liberty and democracy typified by the catalytic role the nation played in creation of the United Nations, the Marshall Plan that rebuilt war-torn Europe, President Jimmy Carters championing of human rights and President George W. Bushs promise to support democratic movements around the world has never had the unanimous support of the American public. And now, at a time of Americans war weariness and widespread concern about the domestic economy, both the public and the US foreign policy establishment are particularly wary of such idealistic foreign policy endeavors.

In 2013 there is an unprecedented lack of support for American engagement with the rest of the world. The public suggests that the nation does too much to solve world problems: About half of Americans, 51 percent, tell interviewers that the United States is overextended abroad, according to a new survey by the Pew Research Center. And when those who say the US does too much internationally are asked to describe in their own words why they feel this way, 47 percent say problems at home, including the economy, should get more attention.

The publics skepticism about US international engagement has increased. Currently, 52 percent say the United States should mind its own business internationally and let other countries get along the best they can on their own. Just 38 percent disagree with that statement. This is the most lopsided balance in favor of the US minding its own business in the nearly 50-year history of pollsters asking this question.

Pew Research: More than half surveyed agree the US should cooperate with the UN, but support is down from 2002.

When it comes to working with the United Nations, the embodiment of the ideal of nations working together, 56 percent of the American public agrees that the United States should cooperate fully with the international organization. But that support is down from 77 percent in 1991 and 67 percent in 2002. And only 37 percent say strengthening the UN should be a top US policy priority.

There is partisan divide on this issue among Americans: Democrats, at 69 percent, are more likely than Republicans, 46 percent, to say the US should cooperate fully with the United Nations. And Republicans or independents who sympathize with the Tea Party are even less likely to want the US to work closely with the UN. Looking forward, 50 percent of Democrats want to strengthen the UN, but only 25 percent of Republicans agree and just 12 percent of Tea Party adherents would strengthen the multilateral body.

Championing human rights abroad, helping improve living standards in developing countries and promoting democracy also rate as relatively low priorities for the American public.

Promoting human rights in other countries is a top foreign policy goal for just 33 percent of the American public. While low, this support is actually up from the 24 percent who prioritized human rights in 2011. Again there is a partisan divide: 41 percent of Democrats, but just 27 percent of Republicans and 19 percent of Tea Party adherents see human rights as a top priority.

Helping boost economies in low-income countries has never been high on Americans to-do list. Nor is it today. Only 23 percent make helping improve the living standards in developing nations a high priority. This includes 32 percent of Democrats, 13 percent of Republicans and just 6 percent of Tea Party sympathizers.

Read the original:
Post new comment