Vaccine Ingredients DNA | Children’s Hospital of …

DNA can be a concern related to vaccines in two ways because it is the vacciness active ingredient, such as in adenovirus-based vaccines, or as a manufacturing byproduct following growth of vaccine virus in human fetal cells.

Because adenoviruses are DNA viruses, when they are used as a delivery vehicle during vaccination, the active ingredient is also DNA. This causes some to wonder whether the DNA delivered during vaccination can alter a persons DNA. In short, the answer is no. The reason that a persons DNA cannot be changed is that a necessary enzyme, called integrase, is not present.

We can be further reassured by the fact that when people get a cold from an adenovirus infection, the adenovirus cannot alter their DNA. As a family of viruses, this is not a role they can play.

Some people wonder whether the vaccines made using human fetal cells (chickenpox, rubella, hepatitis A, one version of the rabies vaccine, and one version of the COVID-19 vaccine) could cause harm if the DNA from the fetal cells mixes with the vaccine recipients DNA. This is not likely to happen:

Read more about the use of human fetal cells.

Yang H, Wei Z, Schenerman M. A statistical approach to determining criticality of residual host cell DNA.J Biopharm Stat 2015;25:234-246.The authors proposed a method for determining the quantity of residual host cell DNA regarding oncogenicity and infectivity. The authors created an equation to estimate the risk and applied that equation to a cell-based influenza vaccine manufactured using Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells. The calculated probability of having one cancer-causing or infective event based on the WHO/FDA limits is less than 10-15. If using limits of 800 base pairs and 40 ng DNA/dose, the risk is estimated to be 4.6 x 10-7.

Yang H.Establishing acceptable limits of residual DNA. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 2013; 67(2):155-163.The author conducted a risk assessment on the WHO and FDA guidelines that recommended 10 ng/dose and 200 base pairs as the limits of residual DNA in the final biological product. The safety margin is defined as the number of doses needed to induce a cancer-causing or infective event in recipients. The author suggested that current safety margin estimates do not take into account DNA fractionation or DNA enzymatic inactivation. By incorporating the number of unfragmented potential cancer genes and accounting for DNA enzymatic inactivation, the author suggests that a more accurate safety margin can be calculated and that higher DNA content or base pair size would be acceptable.

Yang H, Zhang L, Galinski M. A probabilistic model for risk assessment of residual host cell DNA in biological products. Vaccine 2010;28:3308-3311.The authors assessed the cancer-causing and infective potential of residual DNA from a cell-based live, attenuated influenza vaccine that is manufactured in Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells. They determined that 230 billion doses of vaccine would need to be administered before a potential cancer gene dosage equivalent would be reached, and 83 trillion doses would need to be administered to induce an infective event.

Knezevic I, Stacey G, Petricciani J, et al.WHO Study Group on cell substrates for production of biologicals, Geneva, Switzerland, 11-12 June 2007. Biologicals 2008;36:203-211.The WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization adopted requirements for the use of animal cells as substrates for the production of vaccines and other biologicals in 1996. In 2006, a WHO Study Group on Cell Substrates was formed to initiate revision of WHO requirements. In 2007, the Study Group agreed that data generated on the possibility of cancer or an infection caused by DNA in vaccines were important in defining potential risk for vaccine recipients. It was considered highly likely that reduction of DNA fragment size reduced the risk from DNA and increased the safety margin, as the smaller the DNA fragments, the lower the probability that intact oncogenes and other functional sequences would be present. Studies performed at the Center for Biological Evaluation and Research (CBER) suggest that DNA fragments smaller than 200 base pairs will give substantial safety margins for products that meet the 10 ng/dose limit. Therefore, the margin of safety for vaccines can be found in the high fragmentation, and therefore very small size, of DNA.

WHO requirements for the use of animal cells as in vitro substrates for the production of biologicals. Biologicals 1998;26:175-193.Cell lines of human (e.g., WI-38, MRC-5) or monkey (FRhL-2) origin are non-tumorigenic and residual cellular DNA derived from these cells has not been, and is not, considered to pose any risk. Continuous cell line (CCL) substrates of human origin such as HeLa cells (derived from cervical cancer cells) or Namalva cells (derived from Burketts lymphoma) could have the potential to confer the capacity for unregulated cell growth or tumorigenic activity upon other cells. Risk assessment based on an animal oncogene model suggested that in vivo exposure to 1 ng (one-billionth of a gram) of cellular DNA where 100 copies of an activated cancer gene were present in the genome could give rise to a cancer-causing event 1 per 1 billion recipients. The risk associated with residual CCL DNA in a product is negligible when the amount of such DNA is 100 pg (a picogram is one-trillionth of a gram), which is the current maximal amount of CCL DNA allowed by the FDA.

Wierenga DE, Cogan J, Petricciani JC. Administration of tumor cell chromatin to immunosuppressed and non-immunosuppressed non-human primates. Biologicals 1995;23:221-224.The authors addressed the issue of how risky DNA may be as a residual impurity by injecting both normal and immunosuppressed monkeys with 100 million genome equivalents of DNA from a human tumor cell line that is one million times the DNA (1 mg) allowed by WHO in a single dose of biological product (100 pg). DNA from a human tumor, saline, or cyclosporine doses were administered intravenously, intramuscularly, or intracerebrally on either a daily, weekly or one-time basis. Animals were observed for 8 years, none of which showed any evidence of tumor formation.

Lower J. Risk of tumor induction in vivo residual cellular DNA: quantitative considerations. J Med Virol 1990;31:50-53.In 1987, the WHO Study Group compiled a list of experiments in which DNA of tumor viruses or DNA of the corresponding cancer genes were injected into experimental animals to determine the amount required to induce tumors in half of those tested. In this study, the author compared that information with the recommended residual cellular DNA limits (100 pg) in CCL biological products. The author determined that the number of cancer genes in 100 picograms cellular DNA is less than one-billionth of the amount needed to induce tumors in experimental animals.

Temin HM. Overview of biological effects of addition of DNA molecules to cells. J Med Virol 1990;31:13-17.A maximum cumulative probability of having a harmful effect is calculated to be less than 10-16to 10-19 per DNA molecule from a cell without activated precursor cancer genes or active viral cancer genes.

See the rest here:
Vaccine Ingredients DNA | Children's Hospital of ...