Firefox 93.0 release: here is what is new and changed – Ghacks Technology News

> I got font leaks, navigator object leaks, buildID leak, actual version number leaks via feature detection despite the sorry ass fake user agent with RFP, DRM leaks

None of those leak. And if that is all you can come up, then I stand vindicated that you couldnt find anything, especially considering that RFP protects many more items than brave, and yet brave leaks everything

DRM is not RFP protected, so invalid. And clearly you do not understand the rest: that the lowered entropy is per criteria. Your ignorance knows no bounds.

There are no fonts leaks. Font protection is enabled for windows, mac and some linux distros. When used, it does not leak. Prove otherwise, because robust testing says you are a liar. If your claim is that some platforms differ, that is by design. The protection is per platform, including allowing differences in windows 7 vs windows 8/10. Look up the word equivalency, and that this is not a leak

Navigator object does not leak. The object itself is protected. What objects are protected? buildID, productSub, appCodeName, appName, product are the same for ALL Firefox users platform is the same for each OS, RFP does not lie about this so it cant leak that leaves appVersion, oscpu and userAgent which combines the others and adds a version hardwareConcurrency these do not leak in JS using the navigator object not in iframes or via any workers in any way shape or form

So flat out caught you making up more LIES and you trying to pad your pathetic list by listed non-items e.g. DRM and listing items twice e.g. buildID is already listed under your navigator item, and it does not leak it is the same for ALL USERS

What you fail to realize is the reason navigator was added as it is. It is not trying to fully protect these as this is impossible its not even trying to hide the platform. It is to make it harder for scripts, especially when JS is disabled such as safest in Tor Browser. If users are up to date, then any leaks are the same for everyone. If you knew anything about fingerprinting, which you clearly do not, then you would understand that this is equivalency and is not being protected

> Brave fights what you call naive scripts, i.e. most fingerprinting scripts. It also outright blocks a great deal of them natively, without the need for extensions, and does a great deal more than RFP with the weak ass Disconnect list here

reality: RFP in firefox fights what you call naive scripts, i.e most fingerprinting scripts. It also outright blocks a great deal of them natively, without the need for extensions

iron heart: brave works and is good, firefox with exact same method, not working , no good.reality: iron heart cant logic

iron heart: disconnect is weakreality: iron heart making up alternative facts and confusing tracker/fingerprint blocking with adblocking. disconnects fingerprinters list comes from openWPM which is world class, Also dFPI makes this moot real solutions from real engineers

iron heart: brave randomizes and is in a crowdreality: there is no crowd because its randomized

iron heart: leaks come from compatiron heart: blah blah blahiron heart is deliberately being obtuse and ignorant

Heres a tiny snippet of iron hearts lack of knowledge on the subject https://www.ghacks.net/2021/07/31/how-firefoxs-new-smartblock-feature-works/#comment-4501396 https://www.ghacks.net/2021/07/31/how-firefoxs-new-smartblock-feature-works/#comment-4501361

I dont know why youre still ranting about some arkenfox user.js or compat. These have nothing to do with the effectiveness of protecting real values. Your noise levels are stupendously loud, and clearly arkenfox or the fact that firefox can tweak hundreds of settings via this methods triggers you seek some help

> You act as if the FP defenses are the only reason to use the browser

Im not acting like anything. Where did I say that? More lies.

I use Firefox because it is the best browser for privacy, hands down FPI/dFPI, full proper network isolation, and many other options other browsers only wish they could add. Real solutions. Not shitty half baked gimmicks like Braves sevn days cookie lifetime, which didnt cover all cookies, let alone all storage methods, and is bypassed with prolongation attacks.

Brave pales in comparison. Brave is a browser run by an advertising company, which uses privacy as a gimmick to suck in gullible users. Enjoy your shilled shitty bat-shady crypto client which doesnt build anything except useless and incomplete wonky patches on top of googles wet dream

Excerpt from:
Firefox 93.0 release: here is what is new and changed - Ghacks Technology News