The Psilocybin Movement Is Like The Cannabis Movement (Except When It’s Not) – Benzinga

By The French Toast's Vince Silwoski, provided exclusively to Benzinga Cannabis.

A race is underway to explore the attributes of psychedelic mushrooms and to leverage their promise in commercial applications.

There is a bona fide movement underway with psilocybin. Decriminalization occurred last year in Denver, Oakland and Santa Cruz, and that was just a start:nearly 100 other citiesare looking at decriminalizing psychedelics. At the state level, ballot measures are out for signature in California andOregon. Federally,legislationhas been proposed to allow research into psychedelic drugs, alongsidecalls for decriminalization.

On the commercial side, well-funded private companies (for- and non-profit) are pushing ahead with Food and Drug Administrationpsilocybin studies, patent acquisition, and registration of other intellectual property. Many of these private companies areset to go public. Others are public already. All in all, a race is underway to explore the attributes of psychedelic mushrooms and to leverage their promise in commercial applications.

Because psilocybin and otherentheogensare Schedule I drugs in the United States (and strictly controlled under international law), the comparison is often made between what is happening with psilocybin and what happened with marijuana over the past few decades. Its not a terrible comparison, but its not perfect either. Below is a high-level survey of psilocybin, contrasting the lay of the land with historical cannabis progress.

On the first track, psilocybin is moving ahead via initiatives and initiated ordinances, just like marijuana from 1996 to the present. The scope of the psilocybin initiatives is similar to the early marijuana ballot measures in that they focus primarily on decriminalization. These initiatives do not contemplate a commercial model and it seems unlikely that they will be lucrative. They certainly do not yet resemble the second wave of retail model programs that became standard with medical and adult use cannabis. Mushrooms and cannabis are very different in nature.

The second track for psilocybin is the pharmaceutical model. We also saw this with cannabis, first with synthetic drugs and then withEpidiolex, the first non-synthetic cannabis drug to win FDA approval. With psilocybin, this second track is moving faster. The FDA already has granted breakthrough therapy status to a pair of psilocybin applicants for depression-related formulas, afterapprovinganother antidepressant designed to mimic hallucinogenic ketamine last year.

Psilocybin will continue to be decriminalized around the United States in 2020 and beyond. But that is not the same thing as broad legalization. The closest we may get to legalization will be in proposals such as Oregons Measure 34, which goes beyond mere decriminalization to create a state-sanctioned patient and caregiver framework. This type of proposal envisions psilocybin-assisted therapy in controlled environments. It rules out the retail model entirely.

On the pharmaceutical side, the FDAs willingness to grant breakthrough therapy status to psychedelic drugs, as mentioned above, has put psilocybin approvals in an expeditious place. Research companies, along with FDA, are seemingly all in on psilocybins potential in battling treatment-resistant depression. The funding and sophistication required are definitely there.

This targeted pharmaceutical approach will serve psilocybin promoters well, as contrasted with cannabis, which has been touted broadly and amorphously for every use from chronic pain to Alzheimers disease. Expect psilocybin to move more quickly than cannabis on the pharma track. Concurrently, expect the groundswell of broader legalization efforts to continue, even if we never see psychedelics sold at retail.

Photos by: Flickr user afgooey74, HighGradeRoots/Getty Images

Any legal right of adults to decide what to put into their own bodies must be re-litigated with every controlled substance. That was true 100 years ago with alcohol, its true with cannabis, and its going to be true with psychedelics going forward. Much of this litigation happens in the court of public opinion. People begin to believe that prohibition is useless, that incarcerating people for using drugs is wrong and that new rules are needed. This is how we ended up with laws from the 21stAmendment to the U.S. Constitution (1933), to Californias Proposition 215 (1996) to Oregons proposed Measure 34 (2020).

For at least several years, most Americans havesupportedthe medical use of psychedelic drugs. As I previously discussed in a close reading of Oregons proposed Measure 34, the legalization model is similar to the trail blazed by locally cannabis. When enough cities and states move along the continuum from prohibition to decriminalization and beyond, the legal status quo becomes untenable. People will push this hard; people willtry things. At some point, federal policy finally evolves and change becomes inevitable. All of that should happen this decade with psilocybin.

Vince Sliwoski is an attorney atHarris Brickenand this article wasoriginally publishedon theCanna Law Blog.

The preceding article is from one of our external contributors. It does not represent the opinion of Benzinga and has not been edited.

2020 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

See the original post:

The Psilocybin Movement Is Like The Cannabis Movement (Except When It's Not) - Benzinga