The US Finds Itself on the Wrong Side of Imran Khans Populism – The Nation

Pakistans Prime Minister Imran Khan makes a brief statement to reporters before a meeting with US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi at the US Capitol on July 23, 2019, in Washington, D.C. (Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images)

Thank you for signing up forThe Nations weekly newsletter.

IslamabadPakistans embattled prime minister, Imran Khan, in a speech that is likely to reverberate in both Washington and Beijing, accused the United States last week of having crushed the self-esteem of the Pakistani people.

During his address to Parliament, which was ostensibly about the fiscal budget passed the previous day, Khan pontificated on topics as diverse as the golden age of Islam, genetic modifications of Pakistani livestock, and the miraculous achievements of the Communist Party of China.

But nowherenot even while recounting his own achievementswas he as impassioned as when he trained his ire on US-Pakistan relations. Describing Pakistans involvement in the War on Terror as the blackest period in the countrys history, he vowed to never again be a partner in conflict with the United States.

The extent to which he remains able to honor this commitment is yet to be seen. Widely held responsible for mismanaging the economy, which has returned disappointing growth figures and calamitous levels of inflation, he has been hemorrhaging support ever since he was elected amid accusations of vote rigging in 2018. In the Senate elections of March 3, his party failed to gain a majority in the upper house, which was seen as an indictment of not just his leadership but also his ability to enforce party discipline. Members of the lower housewhere Khan has a numerical advantageand four provincial assemblies are tasked with electing senators in a secret ballot, and it is uncommon for the ruling party not to win outright.

There is also a sense in Islamabad that the countrys powerful military elite would prefer to keep positive relations with America and that the timing of Khans speech, which came a day after he told Chinese state media that Pakistan would maintain its close relations with China in defiance of US pressure, could be construed as an attempt at taking sides. Speaking on the 100-year anniversary of the CPC, Khan lauded the special relationship between China and Pakistan and promised to maintain it whatever the circumstances. You only remember a friend who stands with you in your difficult times, he told Liu Xin of CGTN, andnot one to rely on the subtlety of implicationKhan returned to the theme of friendship in his speech the following day. Is America our friend? he asked Parliament. Have you ever heard of a friend bombing you? Have you ever heard of an ally using drone attacks against you?

In the febrile atmosphere of Pakistani politicsexacerbated in this parliament by the oppositions belief that the prime minister was selected by the military rather than elected by the people, it must count as something of a victory for Khan that his remarks on America seemed to energize the housebut then anti-Americanism has always been a popular rallying call. For Sartaj Azizwho served in the previous administration as adviser to the prime minister on foreign affairsit is also an effective way of diverting the agenda from Khans domestic failings. Imrans stock is falling, and he sees this as a way of elevating himself, he told The Nation.

Aziz also suggested that Khan might have been lashing out at having been seemingly slighted by the Biden administration. Even though he became president in January, Joe Biden has apparently yet to make contact with Khan, and senior members of the US cabinet have repeatedly skipped Pakistan in their visits to the region. Just last week, Khans US-educated national security adviser, Moeed Yusuf, appeared to bristle at suggestions that Islamabad was being snubbed by Washington. If they dont want to speak to us, its up to them. No one here is waiting for their phone call.Current Issue

Subscribe today and Save up to $129.

But while the US has yet to reach out to the Khan government, it has contacted the Pakistan military. Back in May, the US Charge dAffairs to Pakistan, Angela Aggeler, met with Chief of Army Staff General Qamar Javed Bajwa to discuss matters of mutual interest and the possibility of strengthening ties. In the aftermath of Khans incendiary speech to parliament, some observers have even begun to speculate that the Prime Minister is trying to show the people that he is still calling the shots.

Whether or not this leads to the kind of protracted tussle between the political and military spheres that resulted in the ouster of former Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif, only time will tell. But what is certain is that the failure of the Biden administration to reach out has allowed Khan and his government to paint the United States as a cynical and exploitative superpower prone to pathological displays of irrationality. Speaking about General Musharrafs decision to join the War on Terror, Khan said, At the time, we were told that America was angry [after 9/11] and that like a wounded bear it could throw its claw anywhere. I used to ask repeatedly what business we had getting involved in that war. Al Qaeda and the Militant Taliban were in Afghanistan, not here.Related Articles

Pakistans relationship with America has been placed in sharp focus by the news that the United States is on the verge of withdrawing its forces from Afghanistan, something that has led many in Pakistan to draw parallels with the end of the Soviet Afghan war. Islamabad believeswith some justificationthat it was left to deal with the blowback of the Mujahideen and the resultant refugee crisis that enveloped the region. The subsequent US invasion of Afghanistan, catalyzed by the attacks on the World Trade Center in 2001, made Pakistan a frontline state in the War on Terror, according to Khan. I asked repeatedly what we had to do with that war, he said. Does any country get involved in anothers war and lose 70,000 lives? What they [America] said, we kept on doing. Musharraf said in his book that he took money and sent people to Guantnamo Bay.

In a lately resurfaced interview from January 2002, however, Khan appears to defend Musharrafs decision to join forces with America. Bearing in mind how opinion has changed since September 11I do not think the president had much choice. I think in the circumstances this is the best he could have done.

Still, what is clear despite the U-turn is that Khan is planning to fight the next election on an anti-America platform. Buoyed no doubt by the exploits of his foreign minister, Shah Mehmood Qureshi, who was given a heros welcome on his return to Pakistan after he accused Israel of having deep pockets in a CNN interview, it would appear that Khans strategy is to position himself as an Islamic leaderalbeit one that doesnt seem terribly interested in the plight of the Uighursat odds with the West and American Imperialism. Whether that will be enough to persuade voters disenchanted with his domestic performance remains to be seen. At the moment it would appear unlikely, but a week is a long time in politics and the next election is not for a couple of years.

Read the original post:

The US Finds Itself on the Wrong Side of Imran Khans Populism - The Nation