Category Archives: Politically Incorrect

In this episode, PitchBook PE and healthcare senior analyst Rebecca Springer welcomes Avi Jayaraman and Dexter Braff for a discussion about the rapidly evolving behavioral health industry and how private equity is helping to drive innovation in the space. Jayaraman co-founded Sonara, which provides a remote solution for medication-assisted opioid addiction treatment. Braff is president of The Braff Group, an M&A advisory firm specializing in healthcare. They share their thoughts on growth and greenfield opportunities in behavioral health, the advantages and challenges that PE firms face when operating in healthcare, how technology can bridge staffing shortages and more. Plus, PitchBook senior manager of publishing joins discuss the 2021 Annual Interactive PE Lending League Tables and PitchBook's exclusive coverage of venture debt deal terms.

In the Upwork segment of "Innovations in Private Equity," Tim Sanders is joined by Dave Stangis, chief sustainability officer and partner at Apollo Global Management. Dave discusses how private equity firms can bring strong sustainability practices to life internally as well as across the portfolio companies they're invested in.

Listen to all of Season 5, presented by Upwork, and subscribe to get future episodes of "In Visible Capital" on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts or wherever you listen. For inquiries, please contact us at podcast@pitchbook.com.

Avi Jayaraman: Thanks Rebecca.

Dexter Braff: Thanks for having me.

Rebecca: I want to give both of you a chance to introduce yourselves a bit and talk about your perspective on the behavioral health space and where that comes from. Avi, maybe you can go first. Why don't you give us the elevator pitch for Sonara?

Avi: Oh, fun stuff. Yes. I'm Avi. [I] founded Sonara in my fourth year of medical school. The reason we founded the company is because right now we live in a pretty remarkable world. You can get anything delivered on Amazon that you want within 48 hours. You can send Jeff Bezos to space, but for some of the most vulnerable in the addiction communityspecifically those addicted to very severe opioidsto get quality treatment, they need to get methadone and they have to go into the clinic every single day to get this treatment for the first few months that they initiate treatment. Then they stay on the drug for quite a while after that, still having to come to the clinic very regularly.

In this world where everyone else can get stuff delivered to their door in 48 hours, we thought there should be a way to get this drug delivered to their doors, or at least taken home in a safe and dignified manner. We came up with a technology platform to help these patients do that, to help clinics keep better track of their patients when they're at home and to just optimize things for everyone involved in this workflow specifically, which is just so highly unique in medicine.

Rebecca: Avi, you're an M.D. What made you want to found a company rather than practicing medicine?

Avi: Oh man, that was totally by accident. ... I met my co-founder just taking an elective course in psychiatry actually. I [had] just finished applying for plastic surgery residencies and I want[ed] to learn more about other types of medicine just before I went and shipped off to the operating room, ostensibly for 90 hours a week for forever. I met Michael, he had this cool idea, and we just rolled with it.

We picked up a bunch of momentum as the year went on. Then once we started getting some serious investor attention, validating things in the market and getting some customer attention, I saw the writing on the wall. I'd had a lot more fun doing this than I had wanting to train to be a doctor. I thought I could make a bigger impact in propagating healthcare technology out to the world, rather than the individual patient-to-patient perspective that you get just when you're in the operating room [and] you're physically limited by what you can do with your hands. I decided to make the jump.

I wouldn't recommend it for most people, but I think we had a pretty cool idea at hand and the ability to help a lot of people quickly. I wanted to strike fast and I suppose I can always go back to medicine if this doesn't work out. It's been a great ride ever since.

Rebecca: Yes. Love it. Dexter, why don't you introduce yourself and introduce us to The Braff Group?

Dexter: Thanks Rebecca. The Braff Group is a boutique M&A advisory company that focus exclusively in healthcare services. One of our primary verticals these days is behavioral healthcare, which has just exploded over the past five years and then exploded even further in the most recent two as it relates to what's happened with COVID.

As we all know, COVID has been very, very difficult on the collective mental health of our country and other countries as well. As a result of that, investors are rightly identifying that whatever streak behavioral health had been on prior to COVID, it's now even greater because of the expectations of increased utilization predominantly in mental health services.

Unfortunately in the servicesnot unfortunately because of Avi's company, unfortunately because of the need for interventions for substance use disorderI think it was well-documented last year that there were 100,000 deaths from opioid addiction, which was absurdly high and the need for intervention on addictions and substance abuse disorder is astonishing.

Within the behavioral health area, we look at five different primary segments within that. That's mental health, substance use disorder, which is what Avi's company is involved with predominantly, intellectual and developmental disabilities, programs that target at-risk youth and then autism services, which has also exploded in the last four or five years.

Rebecca: That's great. With that higher-level view, can you just set the scene for our listeners in terms of what kind of private equity activity we're seeing across behavioral health and some of the economic dynamics that we're seeing in the space?

Dexter: Well, let's just say it's good to be a sell-side intermediary right now in behavioral health. I'm looking at our data over the last 10 years. In 2021 we were able to identify 251 aggregate behavioral health transactions. In the previous year, which was a new record in 2020, was 189. [That's a] 33% increase in the number of transactions done in the behavioral health space from 2021 versus 2020.

The other thing that we note is that within behavioral health, if we look at the percentage of deals being done by private equity versus the percentage of deals being done by strategic players in particular in behavioral health, there's a substantially higher percentage of deals being done by private equity sponsors than there are by strategic players. That includes both platform transactions and follow-on transactions.

Rebecca: Yes, pretty remarkable. I want to bring in this regulatory and policy context as well, because this has been in the news lately, the last State of the Union address included an emphasis on behavioral health. We're seeing some movement at a really bipartisan basis at the state level around this space. I'll start with you on this Dexter, but Avi, feel free to jump in. How's the political landscape shaping the investment dynamics that we're seeing right now?

Dexter: Sometimes it's unfortunate when you're talking about something like behavioral healthcare, where people are really struggling. Then you talk about it from an investor standpoint. The reality of it is that the regulatory environment could not be any better than it is for behavioral health. Now, when I say that [it] doesn't mean that there can't be improvements.

What I mean by that is that the openness with which Congress and federal state and local governments are looking at providing services to people suffering from mental health and behavioral health issues has just never been better. There's a real emphasis on trying to find new and creative ways, both for people to access behavioral health services and to have them funded.

It's really politically incorrect at this point to be voting against things that are going to improve access to behavioral healthcare. From that perspective the acceptance is just so favorable. It had been getting better under the Affordable Care Act where President Obama expanded the regulations that required that private insurance reimburse behavioral healthcare services on par with what they were reimbursing on medical services, but even greater as needs have become more important.

The openness with which we're seeing all payer sources looking at behavioral healthcare has never been better with the exception that the private insurance companies are still, they're being dragged, kicking and screaming into the amount of money they're having to spend because the amount of utilization has gone up and their spend has gone up tremendously in behavioral healthcare.

Avi: Well, that's capitalism for you, right? They've got to learn to play the game. I would agree with a lot of what you've just said especially being on the other side of the investment market, trying to raise myself, there is money floating everywhere in the behavioral health space. And fortunately that means that, it's unfortunate that the need is there, but the fact that the money's starting to float around to everyone who needs it, really means that people are starting to pay attention and that the need for important solutions is really staggering.

I think Dexter, you had mentioned the 100,000 opioid addiction deaths that had happened last year. I think that was actually the highest cause of deaths from people age 20 to 50 from 2020 through the end of 2021, higher than COVID even. Then need is certainly there and it goes beyond just the market reaction to the problem. Biden in his last State of the Union speech had mentioned that we need to increase access to care, even named opioid addiction by the specific disease, but they're backing that up hard.

The NIH is investing billions and billions and billions of dollars into technologically enabled solutions for behavioral health. Fortunately for us, that means addiction too, but everyone really wants to solve all of these problems in behavioral health and I think it's an amazing time for people to be looking for solutions and looking to invest in solutions.

Dexter: Yes, and one of the things that we sawI was writing something about tech-enabled pay for healthcare, and the space that you're in Avi is so attractive because you're not only marrying the behavioral health needs, but you're marrying a technology solution or assistance into that and so your matching digital health on one side, behavioral health on the other, and people just love that combination. But I believe I read somewhere, and Avi you might have seen a different number, but I think I read somewhere there were approximately 20,000 different apps that have been developed that in some way, shape or form are trying to address the various different aspects of behavioral health.

We're talking about these various different [apps], like Calm is one of those apps that you see advertised on television. But there are literally thousands and thousands of applications that people are trying to develop to engage people from that smartphone interface, as people are trying to find easier ways, frictionless ways, to engage people, to get more in touch with their mental health needs. One of the things that we see as a result of that, is we see that, and I think the investment community sees it right, is that any of these access points are ways, not necessarily to cannibalize services that might be used by more traditional mental health providers, but bring people in as people who would otherwise never seek treatment.

Now we're seeing an easy way to do it and to say, "Hey, I'd like this, I'm getting benefit out of this, I'd like to expand that into other areas, and maybe tap into telehealth, telemedicine, face-to-face type of services." And then the money is there to support it. You've really got this tremendous [support] from various different directions, this groundswell of access into behavioral health services, it's really a fascinating time.

Avi: Absolutely. It's almost like you've seen our company. I should just have you do our pitch for us. You certainly know what to do.

Dexter: By the way, Avi, I'd like to do that, anytime you're ready I'm all with you, but it's a great thing that you're doing in there. There are other folks that are working on that tech adjacency to these services and there are some people who are doing really, really innovative creative work that are generating real, measurable returns. Not only do we get to see the financial benefits that investors and sellers have, but it's really making a difference and it's always a nice bonus.

Rebecca: I want to jump in and put a kind of a fine point on that and then I'm going to hand it back to you, Avi, because I think we've seen such a broad interest in telehealth through the COVID pandemic, a lot of investor interest in anything that can be considered remote or enabling healthcare to happen outside of a clinic or a hospital, and we're starting to see in public markets, certainly, and maybe, to a lesser extent private markets, kind of a winnowing down of solutions that do clearly add value to the patient care experience and maybe those that were sort of jumping on a trend, but haven't really proven that value that they can add.

I want to turn it back to you, Avi, and talk to you a little bit about where are the data points in terms of telehealth utilization by patients within behavioral health? I think behavioral health is one area where we're able to see really clear positive results from telehealth solutions. Maybe talk a little bit about that.

Avi: Yes, totally. I can speak more specifically to patients with opioid addiction. I think I'll leave the kind of broader telehealthI mean, I imagine the numbers are, I don't think you have to be a genius to figure out that the numbers are probably higher now than they've ever been and that access is greater than it's ever been. But even saying that, I don't really think it brings to light how ubiquitous this type of thing is now and I think discussing a little bit about the most vulnerable opioid addiction patients can really bring to light how technologically enabled kind of everyone is.

So one of our early customers/partners is a clinic in rural Oregon right now. I think about like a good two-hour drive from Portland, another hour-and-a-half drive from Eugene, if you were to fly in there. Relatively low literacy rates in a very, very rural community. Exactly the type of place where you wouldn't expect people to have smartphones or internet or LTE, 5G, or whatever it is. And when we were doing some of our early market research last year, we realized that like 84% of them had a smartphone with a data plan.

These are folks ... I'd say maybe not half of them are homeless, but probably a good quarter of them don't have stable housing. A number of them are under the poverty line. But the one thing that really seems to be connecting everyone is that they do have access to technology now. Again maybe the most, most, most vulnerable folks don't, but we're really reaching a point where everyone's able to access tech and get themselves plugged into exactly the type of help they need.

With opioid addiction specifically, I think Sonara it's just one solution. That's specifically for the folks who need methadone, but there are tons of other applications, really high-growth startup companies that are there helping folks with addiction who don't need methadone, and it's amazing to see.

Dexter: Yes, the broad telehealth utilization obviously has gone up with COVID. There has been a contraction, by the way, in the last five or six months, because what happened is that the payers and the government pretty much opened the floodgates and said, "We are not going to subject these types of visits to the type of scrutiny that we would normally apply in terms of whether or not it's a reimbursable service or not." There was this acknowledgement across, by the way, many healthcare sectors, where their guidelines for getting paid were loosened.

Look, we're not going to require you to do all this pre-authorization. We're not going to require this. We're not going to require that. We need to push out services, and we'll worry about that later. So you saw this big explosion. [Now] we're seeing a little bit of contraction. But the thing about [it] that's inescapable, is that if you think about telemedicine, and you think about applications for telemedicine, what could be more intuitively understandable than talk therapy? I don't have to have somebody look in my ears, to see if I have an earache, it is already a visual and a verbal medium.

Now, there'll be people, and Avi you probably know about this, that will say that there is something lost in the actual in-person, body language type things that you can't quite get. But if you think about the greatest, easiest application of telemedicine within all of healthcare services, you look at mental health and talk therapy. It's about as intuitively likely to be successful without loss of clinical efficacy, as virtually anything else.

I've used, for example, telemedicine for some physical ailments and I'm like, "I hope that the doctor can see everything." But I'm not 100% sure it's efficacious, but talk therapy, I would imagine it's probably very, very efficacious.

Rebecca: Well, there's also an element of access to care for folks who may live a distance from a clinic to Avi's point about rural communities. I don't know if either of you have a perspective on how that's perhaps changed some of the provision of behavioral health.

Dexter: Well, you can't see a therapist now. I mean, right nowand I know this from personal experience from some family membersto try and get an appointment, to be a new patient for a mental health provider, is very difficult. People [are saying], "I have no room." And the shortage of healthcare professionals across the board is acute. It was acute prior to COVID. It's much worse now with COVID.

But even within the healthcare professionals, SAMHSA, which is a government body that kind of looks over addictions, put out a report that suggested that the number of behavioral health professionals broadly speaking, that would be necessary within the next three to five years is something on the order of five million5.2 million, 5.3 million. And they say that the number of people that are currently in those positions are about 800,000.

They're suggesting is about an 80% shortfall in the amount of professionals that are needed. And in clinical nursing there's a shortfall, but it's not 80%. And so it is so difficult. Telepsychiatry and telemental health is designed to at least provide some access to people who can't otherwise get it because some places you might have some capacity built in, but it's hard. One of the best value propositions, if we were to represent a telepsychiatry company, one of the biggest value propositions is just simply having the psychiatrists and the practitioners that are able to actually do the service, because it's just not there.

Rebecca: This staffing issue is something that is on the mines of everyone in healthcare, but as you say, Dexter, it's just been such a key issue for behavioral health. Avi, how have you thought about your own product in the context of addressing the shortfall and providers?

Avi: Yes, I would love to say that we can totally fix that problem. I don't think we can, but I really do think we can help with that one, at least specifically in the context of the pandemic and a highly contagious disease, which fortunately isn't that terrible, but gets in the way of people's lives now. A number of these clinics that we go to are in very rural communities. It's not just a matter of people having burnout now that the staffing problem is there. It's because physically for people ... [in clinics that] are fully staffed, the staff can't come in because a bunch of them end up having COVID or whatever it is.

And obviously, that boils down to the root problem of maybe that full staffing wasn't actually full, but what we would hope for technology to do is be able to either increase access to care for patients or make life easier for clinicians, right? Right now, in methadone clinics and opioid treatment programs, patients have to come and be seen taking their medicine every single day when maybe they could be doing that on video instead, maybe for patients who know that they come in and they take their meds like they're supposed to.

You don't have to watch every video with the normal speed. Maybe you could speed those videos up for some patients, maybe you don't necessarily have to have them come in every single day, or maybe you can communicate with them in some other way. Instead of having clinic staff who are reviewing videos necessarily be at the clinic every day maybe they could do some of this work from home. In terms of what our technology does, I think reducing foot traffic to the clinic, of course makes itI guess COVID [is] hopefully going through one of its valleys now and not at one of the peaksbut I think that would help reduce foot traffic to the clinic, prevent risk of staff getting sick from their patients and then staff getting sick from one another too.

Anything that allows the work to be done from home, it's not really a medical specific thing, would probably help a lot in the medical world where the disease is more likely maybe to be spread around.

Dexter: There is also another factor and that is that the specific area that Avi is in, which is medication-assisted treatment, is ... , from a human resource perspective, [far] less costly than other treatment mechanisms. Now you can get instances and theoretical issues that people get a little anxious about, and some people believe in abstinence-only programs and they're not real big fans of medication-assisted treatment. But the reality of it is, it has been proven time and time again, from an effectiveness standpoint, in terms of people staying on medication, staying employed, staying with their families, not resorting to any criminal activities.

Medication-assisted treatment is not only the most effective, but it also requires the least amount of external resources. So as you move, not only toward a technology-enabled solution, but you move toward a technology-enabled solution that is a medication-assisted treatment solution, that in and of itself is a less human resource-intensive approach, which is why the government agencies really like that as an intervention strategy.

The residential programs obviously have a different approach and it's not that one necessarily is instead of the other, they could be a continuum, but the fact of them matter is that MAT, medication-assisted treatment, can extend the resources that are available without having to necessarily have to add tons and tons of staff. Now again, we're only talking about addictions [and] substance-use disorder. We're not talking about mental health, autism services, individuals with developmental disabilities, that's a whole another area of behavioral health.

Avi: Of course, and I think one important thing to hit on specifically in substance abuse and specifically with opioids, the term medication-assisted treatment, it sounds obvious to a lot of people, right? You take medication, it assists with your treatment. But if those people need medicine for the disease that they're afflicted with right now, by a disease called addiction, they're going to get that medicine wherever they go. So whatever technological solutions come around, they need to make it more appealing to seek to specialized treatment than it is to just go and get the drugs on the street or to go get the drugs from whoever you're going to get the drugs from.

That's such a big part about making any of these solutions succeeding, right? The ones that succeed are the ones that make it easier to seek treatment rather than the ones that add hurdles, even if they reduce costs or help in some other way.

Rebecca: I want to bring it back a little bit to the investor perspective, not to dehumanize the conversation, but because it's really important to get these clinics and these treatments funded and because we are a private equity podcast, so here we go. [I] wonder, Dexter, if you can talk a little bit about how you are seeing behavioral health providers position themselves in terms of this staffing shortage that we're looking at, in terms of the technologies that can be adopted to mitigate it. What are some of the selling points that a provider might have when they're approaching a private equity buyer that might make them stand out?

Obviously you can't just snap your fingers and have plenty of providers running around everywhere, but you can make some of these dynamics a little bit more attractive for a specific group, so maybe talk about that.

Dexter: Yes, as you mention, there are a variety of issues. Right now, a lot of private equity, it's not that they don't want companies that have technology part of them, they do, but that's one of the value adds that they bring, often. What they're predominantly looking for, what they really want to do is, they want to see programs that are where there's strong census, where the number of patients that they are treating is regular and or increasing. They want to see good clinical protocols to make sure that what's being done are good and accurate services [that] are being billed properly.

One of the things that they are very, very concerned about is the difference between what a company is billing and what they actually get paid. Because when you're dealing with private insurance, very often there's a bill rate and then there's a pay rate. And those numbers can be very, very different and if you're not managing that revenue cycle well, you can think that you have a $20 million company when you really have a $18 million company and an $18 million company may look really great. But if $2 million isn't really there and your EBITDA is $5 million, it means your EBITDA is actually now $3 million and all of a sudden the numbers become very different. They're very concerned about in-network versus out-of-network providers.

For those of you who don't know, when services are being provided out-of-network, so a beneficiary is accessing care that is not part of their network of services, the bill rates tend to be much, much higher. And in behavioral healthcare, there's a lot more out-of-network coverage because I can't access a lot of my behavioral healthcare services in my catchment area where I have insurance. So if I want to go to a residential treatment center, there may not be one in the area where I'm currently covered by my insurance. So the utilization of out-of-network services is substantial in behavioral health, much more than we see in other areas. So understanding the reimbursement dynamics between in-network and out-of-network is very, very critical.

Buyers also like when services are being provided in a tight footprint. So there's one thing about having a clinic in Seattle, and a clinic in Boston, and a clinic in Dallas, and a clinic in Chicago ... But it would be much better if I had one in Seattle and Olympia and Portland, and so I could say I serve the Pacific Northwest. Because there's commonality of reinsurance. There's a greater opportunity to leverage infrastructure. We don't have to manage by going across the entire country from West Coast to East Coast. Those are some practical issues which contribute to value. As you can imagine, there are a host of other things, but those are some of the big ones.

Compliance, though. I will say that if compliance is not there at pretty much the gold standard, it's not like buyers go, "Well, I would have paid $20 million for your company, but your compliance is so-so, I'm going to pay you $18 million." It's, "I would have paid you $20 million and now I'm not going to buy it."

Rebecca: Interesting and [I] want to pick up on one thing that you said there. Often a private equity firm is going to make an investment in a provider group. One of the things that they're going to look to do in addition to growing revenue expanding, improving some operations is to add technology-enabled elements. Avi, I want to turn this over to you. What should provider groups and their private equity sponsors look for in evaluating a technology partner?

Avi: Yes, that's a good one.

Rebecca: Other than going with Sonara, clearly.

Avi: Yes, it keeps on coming back to everyone should just buy us. But I guess if everyone doesn't want to buy us, other things that they should look for should be things that I think we excel at. The first thing I think that's really important, just from a fundamental level, is alignment of all your stakeholders. Everyone knows that in healthcare, behavioral health, ... honestly just any technology that's going to be helping people's lives, the patient, whoever's the end user, needs to be able to use it well. The provider needs to use it well, have clear benefit, and it has to benefit the payers eventually, too. Without those fundamental three layers of alignment, I think any solution is going to fail.

I'm sure there are some that are falling through the cracks, but at an early-stage company, I don't think you really want to take a risk on investing in a technology or taking up a technology that doesn't do all those three things. From that point onward, I think scalability is something that's important. I remember early on one of our original ideas was not very cost effective, but it still aligned the payers, the providers and the patients. It made everyone's lives easier, but it cost too much money.

Even though it saved payers a little bit of money, in the end, it wasn't really worth the upfront investment to go and propagate everything. Cost effectiveness is huge. I think not just from a pragmatic perspective, but just from an uptake perspective, any technology that you want to go propagate in the healthcare world shouldn't be a technology that's made just for the Kaiser Permanente's or the UC San Francisco's or the Harvard's and the Yale's of the world.

Going back to Sonara, we tried to make our software something that I can go into a rural clinic in the middle of nowhere in any rural state that's two, three hours from the nearest airport [and] I can get them up and running in three hours. Every solution does not have to be that simpleif it is, that's probably not a good thingbut they need to be able to scale quickly at a low cost and in a variety of different environments. [That's] I think the second layer.

The third is probably just likability of the team which I think is just normal VC stuff. From both a provider and an investor standpoint, you want to listen to people who are coachable. In the end if you're a provider, that customer that you're buying technologies from, they're working for you. They should listen to you, they should be willing to customize things to what you want or to address the needs that you have. And if you're an investor, you now you'veDexter, it's clear from the way you talk that you've been around the block. You know what you're doing, right? If I were to come here and start not listening to you if you were to give me advice on something, that'd be pretty silly, you wouldn't want to partner with me. I think just from a person-to-person level they need to be likable. It doesn't need to be that they're amazing, great people, but you should at least get along with them.

Dexter: Yes, and Rebecca there's also something really unique that's happening right now with private equity groups and what's happening particularly in behavioral health. That's that they have a real challenge because the typical model that we would see in healthcare services, where there is so much fragmentation out there, is that I buy at a small company multiple, and I get really, really big, and then I sell for a large-company premium plus other improvements to profitability I may have been able to add along the way with technology and revenue cycle management and things of that nature.

One of the challenges private equity has, of course it's to the benefit of the sell-side folks, which is what we work on, is the valuations that buyers are having to pay right now for companies that they previously would not have to put these kinds of multiples in. They're now buying companies at size premium levels. So we have clientsand this is literal and it is surprising to mewe will have clients that have well below $5 million of EBITDA, that are getting multiples of 12x and 13x.

Now, that used to be the exit multiple after I had gotten to size. If I'm buying at 13x, there's not a lot of multiple expansion I can get with size. There may be some, but it's not nearly as much as it was before. The pressure to me as a buyer is I have to look at it two different ways. I have to first really focus a lot on what I can do to increase profitability in terms of real organizational improvements. I have to be a better private equity group than I had to be before, because before I could just rely on getting big.

Now some people did it better than others and also added the other things, but you could do really well buying companies at 6x and selling at 12x. That's a model that works. That opportunity is substantially less. I have to be able to really add real value in terms of technology, marketing, revenue cycle management, and all the other nice things that a good private equity can do, can hook up companies with human resources and things of that nature.

The other thing that we're seeing which is very interesting is the buyers, the ones that are really smart, the PE guys that really understand the market dynamics, after they make their platform deal, they are immediately looking towards startups as opposed to doing secondary acquisitions. Because the ROI on a startup is going to be much higher. But they have to do it early in their investment cycle. They can't wait to year six because that's too late.

One thing about behavioral healthcare is that because it's, generally speaking, not referral-source driven, I actually can have much better opportunity to grab revenue through a startup than I can otherwise have in other businesses that are referral-source driven and I can't grab that referral source from somebody else. It's hard in behavioral health because I'm paying a lot more, but I have greater opportunity to layer on startups. You've got to be good at it, you've got to be conscious of it and you've got to make that a prime directive as opposed to a secondary directive.

Rebecca: Yes, I completely agree. It underlines the importance, I think, for investors in behavioral health right now to be looking into the future and trying to see where this industry is going in terms of patient care improvements and technology improvements to deliver that. I want to put a bow on what has been a fantastic conversation. Thank you both. I wonder if each of you can give me one prediction for the future of behavioral health that is either contrarian or just a little bit under appreciated by folks who might be listening to this.

Dexter: Well, my first prediction is that Avi's company is going to be very valuable. No, I think the one prediction is this is not a flash in the pan. This is not something that's ramping up fast and it's going to fall off as quickly. There is a long runway of opportunity, and the other thing is that the model of delivery is going to change. We're already beginning to see the carters between autism services, individuals with developmental disabilities, at-risk youth. Those are all handling people of youth.

We're beginning to see that the big boundaries between those begin to drop as we're trying to be able to service the whole human. A lot of Avi's services, there's co-existing conditions, co-occurring conditions. Treatment of addiction services is not separate necessarily from treatment of mental health services. People who are beginning to look at treating the mental health services of a population, as opposed to defining my population as someone with addictions, defining my population as anybody who needs to access behavioral and mental healthcare services, is where all of healthcare is going and the opportunities to be able to provide a lifetime suite of services to people at all levels of their treatment program.

Because people in behavioral health don't necessarily have a beginning and a defined end. The opportunity to create new models that have longer and more comprehensive bases of services, I think are absolutely there. They're real. There's benefits to them both financially and clinically, and I think we're going to see that evolve over time.

Avi: Yes, I agree with all of that. I think two specific areas that I think are going to be really interesting to hit on and I think a lot more information and data will come to light in the coming years ... Eventually whatever mental health companies or behavioral health companies start to prop up, they're going to start to going back to helping the most vulnerable people in society. I guess specifically homelessness, low socioeconomic status at birth, those things are intrinsically associated with worse medical outcomes, worse mental health outcomes, worse behavioral health outcomes, and hopefully we don't want technology to leave those folks behind.

I think as a society, we really improve and we become better when all these technologies that we're developing are able to help the most vulnerable and bring the most vulnerable up. ... Right now it's great that most people have smartphones, most people can probably download some app and get access to care, but how many of them have insurance? How many of them can afford to pay for the services once they actually download the app? I think there's going to be a huge, huge, huge explosion.

Whoever figures out that problem, that real access problem, that getting the money to the people who need it problem and seeing if they're able to fix their lives or better themselves however that way. I think that's going to lead to a huge boon in the general mental health of the nation. Part of that's going to come from behavioral health and increasing access to care, but I'm curious to see what, there's a deeper layer in all of this. I'm fascinated to see what folks can come up with when it comes to helping the whole person and how that's going to affect mental health and behavioral health.

I'll close with one last thought here, I think we probably don't even know what's going to come in the future. We started treating depression by having people snort ketamine five years ago. We eat mushrooms now that like our folks used to eat in the '70s for Grateful Dead concerts and it's like a real medical treatment right now. We can change behaviors with a smartphone and, and we're at the infancy of all of it. Crazy stuff is going to happen.

We just need to make sure it helps the most vulnerable because I think people who are richer, they're happy, they're doing their thing, but society really evolves when it's not just the rich that are benefiting.

Dexter: Avi, you actually said something and I think it's really, really meaningful. Treating the person as a whole. I mean, it's interesting that we separate behavioral health from physical health, because we all know that they're connected. So this is where population health, movements toward population health, are innately going to merge behavioral health services and medical services together. So we are beginning to see combinations of primary care and mental health care and that they're not separate and that we need to blend them from the onset and what opportunities are there to create a more healthy society that down the line is not going to be accessing more expensive care further down.

We have a dichotomous system right now, but arguably it shouldn't be. But everything springs from reimbursement. With models becoming more population-based that changes everything. I've been in a lot of conferences where people talk about the next new thing and it's like, "Yes, maybe." An no. This is happening, this population-based approach towards treating people more of a whole person is definitely happening and I think it's both great clinically and it's good financially from a cost-saving standpoint.

I actually think that we've actually made progress as a nation and as a society in terms of being able to provide services better. It's kind of cool to see some of these forward thinkers when they're talking about stuff, and then they are actually showing that's actually working and it's not really theoretical. That's always pretty exciting.

Avi: Yes, we're already helping patients and we track when you drink your medicine. There's so much more in the world, there's so much more to be connected and to be built on. We live in a pretty beautiful time.

Rebecca: That's a great note to end it on, so I'm going to thank both of you Avi and Dexter for a fantastic conversation. Thanks so much for your time.

Avi: Cool, thanks.

Dexter: Thanks for having us. It was fun.

In this episode

Avinash JayaramanChief Growth Officer and Co-Founder, Sonara

Avinash Jayaraman, M.D., is a co-founder and chief growth officer at Sonara, a healthtech company providing telehealth options for methadone patients. Avi and his co-founder (Michael Giles, M.D.) started Sonara while they were in medical training. Michael wanted to use simple technology to increase access to methadone, a segment of opioid addiction treatment that had been neglected. Since earning his M.D., Avi has been building Sonara full-time.

In his pre-Sonara life, Avi was a prolific researcher across many disciplines including plastic surgery, transplant surgery, psychiatry and genetics. He has been published numerous times and gave over 50 poster and podium presentations at research conferences. Before medical school, he spent time as a project manager at Epic, a transplant surgery researcher at Northwestern, an MCAT tutor with BluePrint prep and also served as a nationally renowned high school debate coach.

Avi holds an M.D. from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas and a B.A. in mathematics from Northwestern University.

Dexter BraffPresident, The Braff Group

See the article here:
On the podcast: The new PE behavioral health play - PitchBook News & Analysis

Country

United States of AmericaUS Virgin IslandsUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsCanadaMexico, United Mexican StatesBahamas, Commonwealth of theCuba, Republic ofDominican RepublicHaiti, Republic ofJamaicaAfghanistanAlbania, People's Socialist Republic ofAlgeria, People's Democratic Republic ofAmerican SamoaAndorra, Principality ofAngola, Republic ofAnguillaAntarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S)Antigua and BarbudaArgentina, Argentine RepublicArmeniaArubaAustralia, Commonwealth ofAustria, Republic ofAzerbaijan, Republic ofBahrain, Kingdom ofBangladesh, People's Republic ofBarbadosBelarusBelgium, Kingdom ofBelizeBenin, People's Republic ofBermudaBhutan, Kingdom ofBolivia, Republic ofBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswana, Republic ofBouvet Island (Bouvetoya)Brazil, Federative Republic ofBritish Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago)British Virgin IslandsBrunei DarussalamBulgaria, People's Republic ofBurkina FasoBurundi, Republic ofCambodia, Kingdom ofCameroon, United Republic ofCape Verde, Republic ofCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChad, Republic ofChile, Republic ofChina, People's Republic ofChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombia, Republic ofComoros, Union of theCongo, Democratic Republic ofCongo, People's Republic ofCook IslandsCosta Rica, Republic ofCote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of theCyprus, Republic ofCzech RepublicDenmark, Kingdom ofDjibouti, Republic ofDominica, Commonwealth ofEcuador, Republic ofEgypt, Arab Republic ofEl Salvador, Republic ofEquatorial Guinea, Republic ofEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFaeroe IslandsFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Fiji, Republic of the Fiji IslandsFinland, Republic ofFrance, French RepublicFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabon, Gabonese RepublicGambia, Republic of theGeorgiaGermanyGhana, Republic ofGibraltarGreece, Hellenic RepublicGreenlandGrenadaGuadaloupeGuamGuatemala, Republic ofGuinea, RevolutionaryPeople's Rep'c ofGuinea-Bissau, Republic ofGuyana, Republic ofHeard and McDonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)Honduras, Republic ofHong Kong, Special Administrative Region of ChinaHrvatska (Croatia)Hungary, Hungarian People's RepublicIceland, Republic ofIndia, Republic ofIndonesia, Republic ofIran, Islamic Republic ofIraq, Republic ofIrelandIsrael, State ofItaly, Italian RepublicJapanJordan, Hashemite Kingdom ofKazakhstan, Republic ofKenya, Republic ofKiribati, Republic ofKorea, Democratic People's Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwait, State ofKyrgyz RepublicLao People's Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanon, Lebanese RepublicLesotho, Kingdom ofLiberia, Republic ofLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtenstein, Principality ofLithuaniaLuxembourg, Grand Duchy ofMacao, Special Administrative Region of ChinaMacedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascar, Republic ofMalawi, Republic ofMalaysiaMaldives, Republic ofMali, Republic ofMalta, Republic ofMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritania, Islamic Republic ofMauritiusMayotteMicronesia, Federated States ofMoldova, Republic ofMonaco, Principality ofMongolia, Mongolian People's RepublicMontserratMorocco, Kingdom ofMozambique, People's Republic ofMyanmarNamibiaNauru, Republic ofNepal, Kingdom ofNetherlands AntillesNetherlands, Kingdom of theNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaragua, Republic ofNiger, Republic of theNigeria, Federal Republic ofNiue, Republic ofNorfolk IslandNorthern Mariana IslandsNorway, Kingdom ofOman, Sultanate ofPakistan, Islamic Republic ofPalauPalestinian Territory, OccupiedPanama, Republic ofPapua New GuineaParaguay, Republic ofPeru, Republic ofPhilippines, Republic of thePitcairn IslandPoland, Polish People's RepublicPortugal, Portuguese RepublicPuerto RicoQatar, State ofReunionRomania, Socialist Republic ofRussian FederationRwanda, Rwandese RepublicSamoa, Independent State ofSan Marino, Republic ofSao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic ofSaudi Arabia, Kingdom ofSenegal, Republic ofSerbia and MontenegroSeychelles, Republic ofSierra Leone, Republic ofSingapore, Republic ofSlovakia (Slovak Republic)SloveniaSolomon IslandsSomalia, Somali RepublicSouth Africa, Republic ofSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSpain, Spanish StateSri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic ofSt. HelenaSt. Kitts and NevisSt. LuciaSt. Pierre and MiquelonSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudan, Democratic Republic of theSuriname, Republic ofSvalbard & Jan Mayen IslandsSwaziland, Kingdom ofSweden, Kingdom ofSwitzerland, Swiss ConfederationSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwan, Province of ChinaTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailand, Kingdom ofTimor-Leste, Democratic Republic ofTogo, Togolese RepublicTokelau (Tokelau Islands)Tonga, Kingdom ofTrinidad and Tobago, Republic ofTunisia, Republic ofTurkey, Republic ofTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUganda, Republic ofUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Kingdom of Great Britain & N. IrelandUruguay, Eastern Republic ofUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofViet Nam, Socialist Republic ofWallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZambia, Republic ofZimbabwe

Read more here:
MICHAEL REAGAN: Welcome home to America the angry - The Albany Herald

No more Colony Days in Palmer?

The Palmer Chamber of Commerce has changed the name of its iconic farm-friendly festival, which honored the hard work of pioneers who settled in the area and brought agriculture to Alaska.

The new name is Braided River Festival, in honor of all the rivers that flow through the area. Its a rebrand, and without saying so, the Chamber is indicating that Colony Days is politically incorrect because of the word colony.

Colony Days has gone on for decades, and features a parade, booths, activities for kids, races, reindeer, a rodeo, car shows, and more.

The community of Palmer was founded in 1935, after 200 or more families were relocated to Palmer from the Midwest under the New Deal, a program created by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Each family was given 40 acres in the region, and the only requirement was that they establish a self-sufficient farming community. The early colonists, as they were called, suffered many hardships to make a life in Alaska in territorial days. Today, Palmer is the agricultural heartbeat of the state, with farms throughout the area. Families of the colonists are proud of their hearty heritage.

After decades of successfully hosting one of the summers largest festivals in the valley, we felt it was important to rebrand it to reflect what it has grown into: a celebration of the many aspects of what makes Palmer unique, said GPCC Executive Director Ailis Vann. A braided river is made up of smaller rivers, creeks, and tributaries that come together to form one large, powerful force. For decades, the Palmer Chamber has also grown into a larger force thanks to the support of our community partners. It also speaks to the natural beauty of the Palmer area, including the Matanuska and Knik Rivers.

Colony Days and the Colony Christmas festival were originally created by the occupants of the Matanuska Colony Project 86 years ago, the Chamber wrote. The Greater Palmer Chamber of Commerce eventually took on organizational duties for the event and grew it into what it is today; a three-day, indoor and outdoor celebration that features a parade, food trucks, vendor booths, family activities, music, and other opportunities to highlight local businesses in Palmer.

This years event is scheduled for June 10-12.

Deputy Mayor Pamela Melin says she is disheartened and saddened by the actions of the Chamber of Commerce, which have taken away the beloved Colony tradition.

My children have celebrated along side me as an adult. Now I have grandchildren who I would love to share these experiences with. To disregard our rich history is not the answer to a cohesive future. If we have truly grown as a people, we wouldnt apply such politically driven and divisive labels such as occupants of the Matanuska Colony Project. I fear the impact to our local businesses that could bear the brunt of such a decision. The people of Palmer deserve to know the following: What led to this radical change and rebranding?Was there data supplied that required this change?Who was the motivator behind determining the need and were there special interest groups involved in the decision making?Who was the key author and designer of the rebrand? Did the board members or members debate or have an opportunity to weigh in on such an impactful decision? Did the members even know this was happening?

There is still a Colony High School in Palmer, but it may be next on the list for a name change to erase the history of the people who came to farm the land.

Like Loading...

See the rest here:
Palmer erases 'Colony Days' and replaces it with more politically correct Braided River Festival - Must Read Alaska

No longer about a place as much as a state of mind, Donald Glovers Atlanta returns after nearly four years for a long-delayed third season doing what this series does best: defying expectations.

Few series would dare to open after such a long break between seasons with an episode that hardly shows its main character, instead spinning a racially charged ghost story as prologue to an alarming modern parable about Black children trapped in a perversion of the foster-care system. What are we to make of these disturbing vignettes? Are they a nightmare? If so, whose, and why?

Coco Olakunle/FX

Before you can even process the weirdness of it all, the second episode (airing back-to-back) snaps us back to the world of Earn (Glover), the barely managing manager of his rapper cousin Paper Bois (Brian Tyree Henry) career, which has taken off with a European tour. Earn, as usual, appears to be over his head as well as a perpetual fish out of water in the cultural fast lane. Hes late getting to the latest leg in Amsterdam, nursing a cold and a bad attitude that doesnt improve when he and Paper Boi (aka Alfred) are exposed to an unsettling and politically incorrect local Christmas custom.

Far from a whimsical travelogue, this season of Atlanta promises to sustain an off-kilter vibe that rattles your nerves. Thats especially true during the second episodes bizarre subplot, a Dutch odyssey involving entourage members Darius (LaKeith Stanfield), who in his druggie haze is right at home in the Venice of the North, and Earns currently rootless ex, Van (Zazie Beetz). They follow their zenand a random clue retrieved from a vintage-shop jacketto become witness to an event thats beyond macabre.

With only the first night available for preview, I have no idea what adventures await Earn and his pals in Europe, but I guarantee it will look like nothing else on TV.

Atlanta, Season 3 Premiere, Thursday, March 24, 10/9c, FX

Continued here:
Roush Review: Expect the Unexpected in Third Season of Atlanta - TV Insider

The Season 3 trailer for "The Boys" has been flagged more than 20 million times since debuting, according to a tweet from the show's official Twitter page. Take your pick for the actual content being flagged. There's the previously mentioned blood and also a little risky business in a bathroom. Homelander (Anthony Starr) appears to take great pleasure in finding the source of his favorite drink: a cow. Plus, there's the always strange The Deep (Chace Crawford), the show's play on Aquaman, except this one has been expelled from The Seven and has been trying to make his way back since. The Deep also has a powerful connection to sea creatures, and Season 3 shows him seductively eyeing an octopus while he's being intimate with what one presumes to be a human.

"Everyone's raving that the Season 3 teaser is 'deeply unhinged' and asking 'what the f**k did we just watch?'" "The Boys" Twitter account wrote in celebration. Some users expressed shock that anyone would be surprised by a trailer for "The Boys" that pushes the envelope."Tell me you've never read the Boys without telling me you've never read the Boys," Twitter user Lymang wrote.User David Olvera added, "wait for them to read the comic."

Fans of "The Boys" have to wait until June 3 for Season 3, but in the meantime, a spinoff animated series titled "The Boys: Diabolical" was released on March 4.

See original here:
The Boys Season 3 Trailer Has Led To A Hilariously Weird Flex - Looper

Amanda Miller| Special to The News

Its just three cookbooks, but they feel very heavy. Their weight, however, is due much more to their content rather than to their actual mass.

I think youll understand why they feel that way when I say the cookbooks are what I found at the library on Ukrainian food. Technically, only one is specifically Ukrainian and the other two are more Russian…which might seem very politically incorrect, but honestly, my heart is heavy for all the people involved in the current terrible violence.

I cant type any words that make anything better for the families that are suffering; I cant make the pain, destruction, heartache, terroror loss go away.

One very small thing I can do, however, is cook Ukrainian recipes. The table is such a central aspect of how we live out community, and though Ukraine is across the globe, I want them to feel not so far away. I want to show honor, respectand sympathy, to somehow use bread, honeyand dill to send a hug all the miles over. Ukraines common ingredients and culinary traditions are rich, strongand full of history, and its a privilege to draw from those flavors to bring food to our table.

I always find that the more I research a country and taste its food, the more connected I feel and the more I love it. Food is never just food: it tells stories on the plate.

As I paged through the recipes, a few themes emerged. Poppyseeds and mushrooms both showed up way more than I expected. Hardy vegetables like potatoes, onionsand beets are common, as you might have expected, but produce choices certainly arent limited to them, as a variety of herbs and fruits also feature prominently, and summers are warm enough that home gardens are popular and productive. They enjoy lots of cultured dairy products, which of course I love, as well as a wide selection of fermented vegetables and fruits, way beyond sauerkraut.

Researching recipes also showed me that we in Kansas have a special connection to Ukraine. Theres nothing more Kansas-y than bright yellow sunflowers stretching under a blue sky, or golden wheat waving as far as the eye can see, right?

Apparently there might not be much more Ukraine-y, either!

Kansas is the Sunflower State, and Ukraines official national flower is the sunflower. Sunflowers have been grown in Ukraine since the 1700s, and their oil is crucial in traditional cooking, especially during Lent when animal products are abstained from in the Orthodox church. Sunflowers are now emerging as a symbol of solidarity for Ukraine in this conflict.

Kansas is considered the breadbasket of the U.S., but Ukraine is the breadbasket of the world, purportedly home to the best climate to grow wheat! Not surprisingly then, flour is one of the most prominently featured ingredients in Ukrainian cuisine. Breads of all shapes, sizes, and flavors; doughnuts, rolls, dumplings, noodles, cakes, the list goes on. From savory to sweet, baked to fried, simple to elaborate, everyday to holiday, they have amazing options for flour.

Though its a little early according to the calendar, and technically shouldnt be made during Lent due to all the eggs and dairy, I baked up a traditional Easter bread last week. It is called paska, in eastern Ukraine it is sweeter, tallerand topped with icing; and in western Ukraine it is breadier, rounderand topped with designs of dough; but in both, it is delicious, largeand celebratory.

Like the cookbook it was in, making the bread felt heavy. Partially because I didnt give mine enough time to rise well, so it actually was too dense. But mostly it felt heavy because I so want the promise of Easter, of life after darkness, to be true for the people of Ukraine right now. I want this season of Lent, of waiting and sorrow, to be over for them. But its not yet.

So for now, we eat paska, bread that is sweet and heavy and takes time, bread that is eaten each year as it symbolizes Easter joy after Lenten sorrow. And with each slice, we hope and pray for Ukraine.

Traditionally baked in very large loaves (using up to 5 pounds of flour), paska announces the end of the fast with plenty of eggs and butter. I decreased the recipe size but not the flavor, combining the cloves of one style with the citrus of another style; that might sound wintry to us, but somehow it tastes exactly like Spring, too. This can be served with a very similarly-named pascha, which is a sweet spread made from a cultured cottage-cheese-style cheese called tvorog; you may see a recipe for that in the future, because its super delicious, but you can also just add vanilla and lemon to sweetened cream cheese.

Prep tips: as noted, this does take quite some time to rise, as its a very heavy dough. Give it at least five hours, but remember that is hands-off time and this is really very simple.

1 tablespoons instant yeast

cup warm water

cup sugar

3 eggs

4 tablespoons melted butter

zest and juice of 1 orange

1 teaspoon cloves

cup warm whole milk

5-6 cups flour

In a large mixing bowl, whisk yeast and water with a pinch of the sugar. Let it set until it bubbles, five minutes. Mix in the remaining ingredients, starting with the lesser amount of flour. Knead by hand or with mixer for several minutes, until dough is smooth and elastic, adding flour as necessary. Let rise until doubled. Knead again slightly and shape into a round, placing into a buttered round casserole dish, and letting rise until doubled again. Bake at 325 for 45-60 minutes, until fully golden and firm. Let cool, remove from pan, and ice with a simple powdered-sugar glaze and/or serve slices spread with cream cheese (see note).

TocontactAmandaMiller, email her athyperpeanutbutter@gmail.com

Originally posted here:
Cooking Ukrainian recipes and sending a hug by cooking Ukrainian Easter bread - paska - The Hutchinson News

Im struck by the recent movement, currently in at least 36 states, to restrict teaching the history of racism in schools. The motivation is pretty clearly stated in the bills and laws.

Georgia House Bill 1084 bans divisive concepts that include claims that the United States is fundamentally or systematically racist, and instructs that no one should feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress because of his or her race.

Bills using the same language have been proposed in dozens of states, backed by the Center for Renewing America, a think tank led by former Trump administration officials.

The past few years weve seen a lot of conservative criticism about the snowflakes at our colleges and universities. Walter E. Williams of The New American magazine provides just one example when he ridicules spineless college administrators and the college students they cave in to who are easily traumatized by criticism and politically incorrect phrases. They demand safe spaces and trigger warnings . . . as though they must be protected against words, events, and deeds that do not fully conform to their extremely limited, narrow-minded beliefs built on sheer delusion.

Not only do conservative lawmakers whine about acknowledging the realities of our political and social history; theyre passing laws against even discussing them. Theyre so sensitive!

I have to wonder: Who are the real snowflakes?

Russel Feldman

Newton

Read more:
Will the real snowflakes please stand down? - The Boston Globe

Kyiv March 24, 2022

During the homily given at the daily Moleben (Paraklesis or Supplicatory Canon to the Theotokos) for Peace offered at the Patriarchal Cathedral of the Resurrection in Kyiv on March 24, Patriarch Sviatoslav (Shevchuk), Father and Head of the world-wide Ukrainian Greco-Catholic Church (UGCC) reflected on the forthcoming consecration of Russia and Ukraine to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, reported the Religious Information Service of Ukraine (RISU).

In his remarks, His Beatitude noted the readiness of the entire UGCC to join in this solemn act of consecration and noted that to speak of the conversion of Russia was at one time considered politically incorrect:

In accordance with the petitions of the Blessed Virgin Mary, which she proclaimed in the early twentieth century in Fatima, Pope Francis, together with the bishops of the Catholic Church around the world, will consecrate Ukraine and Russia to the Immaculate Heart of the Blessed Virgin Mary. The Theotokos petitioned for prayers for the conversion of Russia, because otherwise the evil that will come out of it will destroy other countries. Formerly, it was said that we should not talk about the Fatima apparition, so as not to offend Russia, but now the Holy Father wishes to pay attention to this request of the Theotokos for this consecration to defeat the evil that comes to our lands from that part of the world and Europe.

Continuing, His Beatitude noted that Kyivan-Rus and especially the city of Kyiv was initially consecrated to the Theotokos after Grand Prince Yaroslav the Wise completed the famous golden domed St. Sophia Cathedral in the 11thcentury, with its central mosaic of the Theotokos Orante or Theotokos, Indestructible Wall.

The Patriarch concluded his homily with a prayer for the defeat of the apocalyptic beast unleashed on Ukraine by the Russian aggressors:

May this evil be defeated in the north, south, west and east of Ukraine. We know that the Immaculate Heart of Mary is a symbol of Her holy and pure will, which she showed when she said yes to the Archangel Gabriel. (Luke 1:38) At that moment, the Blessed Virgin Mary erased the head of the devil, an apocalyptic beast that is raging again, attacking Ukraine from Russia. May this consecration be the moment when the head of this serpent, by the power of prayer of the Theotokos herself, the Immovable Wall of Kyiv, will be raised again in Ukraine! We believe in this and we pray for it. We say: Most Holy Theotokos, save us! Amen.

Read more:
The Consecration of Russia Will Be Victory Over Evil: Ukrainian Catholic Patriarch - OnePeterFive

This Sundays Academy Awards will be a litmus test of whether Hollywood can uncouple itself from the political agenda of young woke radicals that is proving so unpopular in the US. Joe Biden had a stab at it during his State of the Union address, criticising the defund the police movement for fear of a Democrat wipeout in the midterms, and the New York Times did an astonishing volte-face last week, publishing an editorial in defence of free speech. A bit rich from the paper that recently forced out its most distinguished science reporter at the behest of its junior staff for using the n-word in a discussion about the appropriate use of the n-word.

But will the luvvies be able to resist trotting out all the usual fashionable platitudes about sex, race and gender? The producers of the Oscars certainly hope so. Last years telecast only attracted 10.4 million viewers, down from 23.6 million in 2020, and various initiatives have been introduced to boost the audience figures.

For instance, this years hosts are three potty-mouthed comedians: Amy Schumer, Regina Hall and Wanda Sykes. Schumer has said she intends to emulate Ricky Gervais, whose politically incorrect monologues as host of the Golden Globes have attracted huge audiences on social media. Im going to get myself in some trouble, she said earlier this month. Ill burn every bridge.

Then theres the addition of a new fan favourite category, voted for by Twitter users. This is to give the producers an excuse to show clips from some of the most commercially successful films of last year such as Spider-Man: No Way Home, Venom: Let There Be Carnage and No Time to Die, none of which has been nominated for Oscars in any of the major categories. But Twitter has allowed each user to vote up to 20 times a day, creating an opportunity for fans of particular films (and actors) to game the contest. Already, a hard core of Johnny Depp enthusiasts have ensured that his latest film an obscure art-house offering called Minamata is on the shortlist. Its one thing for the Academy Awards to become slightly less woke; quite another to honour a man whose ex-wife has accused him of repeatedly assaulting her.

Presumably, one of the reasons Depps fans have got behind Minamata is because theyre unhappy that hes been dropped by Hollywood its a protest against cancel culture. Which gives me an idea. If the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences really wants to push back against the Torquemadas of the progressive left, it could include an addendum to its In memoriam section listing all the Hollywood celebrities who were cancelled in 2021. Number one on the list would be Alec Baldwin, clutching a prop gun and flashing a cheeky grin.

Heres another suggestion: why not introduce a rule whereby any winner who expresses support for a political cause during their acceptance speech has to forfeit their gold statuette? This is a role that Ricky Gervais was born for. I can imagine him marching up to Steven Spielberg, snatching the Oscar from his hand and saying: Sorry, but a man who owns a $70 million private jet doesnt get to lecture us about climate change.

And if the producers want to win back some of those disgruntled red-state viewers, why not hire the pro-Brexit musical comedian Dominic Frisby to perform some of his songs? Theres one I particularly like called Maybe that includes the line: Maybe Donald Trump is not all bad. Id actually stay up till four oclock in the morning just to see the look on Frances McDormands face. Now theres a clip that would go viral on social media.

But in truth I dont expect 2022s Academy Awards to be much of a departure from previous years, i.e. a snorefest of nonstop virtue signalling. Just as most leading Democrats cannot help but engage in ritualised bouts of racial self-flagellation, even though they know its Kryptonite to white working-class voters, so multi-millionaire movie stars will drone on about the under-representation of women and minorities in spite of the television audiences lack of interest in their political views. I dont suppose Joe Bidens tack to the centre will save his Congressional colleagues in November, and the inclusion of a couple of risqu gags by Amy Schumer wont be enough to stop the Oscars haemorrhaging viewers. It will be a few years yet before Americas liberal establishment learns the lesson thats currently being meted out to the mainstream media: get woke, go broke.

Read the original:
How to save the Oscars - The Spectator

Debra Soh is a sex neuroscientist, the author of The End of Gender and the host of The Dr. Debra Soh Podcast.

A recent opinion piece in The New York Times spoke to the ideological intolerance and accompanying self-censorship that has crept its way into many peoples lives. The author, a college senior at the University of Virginia, described how students must hold back in class discussions, in friendly conversations, on social media from saying what [they] really think, when discussing subjects like diversity training, racial justice, and gender. It is only when the author is quite literally behind closed doors, speaking in hushed tones with her professors and friends, that ideas can freely circulate, according to the piece.

Its a hostility I know well.

Open dialogue used to be the hallmark of academic conversations and the purpose of pursuing higher education. Instead, I constantly hear from students about how they refrain from asking questions or offering their opinions out of fear that they will anger their peers and alienate their professors. There is a quiet understanding that failing to regurgitate certain preapproved leftist platitudes will bring about disaster in the classroom and beyond.

A survey by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education and RealClearEducation found that about four in five university students report self-censoring at least some of the time, and roughly one in five students say they do it often. These effects were found regardless of ones identity markers, including race or sexual orientation.

The problem affects students and academics across the political spectrum, but it is disproportionately felt by right-leaning individuals. This is because left-leaning professors tend to outnumber conservative professors on campus; in social sciences and humanities departments, which are primarily focused on cultural politics and activism, left-leaning professors dominate at a ratio of 14 to one.

The Center for the Study of Partisanship and Ideology found that more than half of conservative academics admit to self-censoring in their research and teaching, and 70 per cent report a departmental climate that is hostile to their beliefs. Political discrimination takes the form of excluding professors from hiring, funding and social situations, like sitting together at lunch. It also normalizes attitudes about firing them for controversial or politically incorrect research findings.

These consequences are further amplified by university administrators and other professors who fail to defend academics when they are attacked for their work, deciding instead to remain silent or siding with the loud minority of students having a meltdown.

The fact that closed-mindedness is being rewarded throughout a system responsible for educating impressionable minds should be unsettling to anyone enjoying the benefits of living in a democracy. To make matters worse, critics on the political left will too often claim that concerns of self-suppression are overblown, missing an opportunity to use their platforms to advocate for a solution.

We rightfully frown upon discriminating against people based on characteristics like race, sex, sexual orientation and gender identity, yet it remains socially acceptable to exclude and demonize people for their political beliefs. This is not an issue confined to the loony fringes of the academic world, but something that affects everyday people in the workplace, as well.

According to a Cato Institute poll, nearly one-third of Americans say they worry about losing job opportunities or being fired if their political opinions become known. This self-censorship affects people across the political spectrum, but is again particularly pronounced among conservatives (77 per cent say they feel prevented from saying things they believe) and highly educated people (44 per cent of Americans with a postgrad degree say they fear losing their job or missing out on opportunities if their political opinions became known).

Ideological dissenters are not the only ones harmed by this illiberalism. Students who dont fear unwanted consequences for their opinions are also adversely affected. Completing several years or degrees in an academic setting without having to seriously contend with a different point of view reinforces the false perception that the affirmed, often hyper-progressive values are, by default, correct. It impedes ones ability to reconcile that people of different political persuasions or opinions are still fellow humans and thus worthy of respect.

After all, some of the most interesting and inspiring conversations can flourish from disagreement. Students who are shielded from these exchanges miss vital opportunities to refine their critical thinking skills and better understand the world we live in. Instead, our universities are allowing them to languish in a fantasyland in which adhering to popular opinion, and ignoring all others, warrants praise, ascendancy and immunity from criticism.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Visit link:
Opinion: What is lost when universities self-censor - The Globe and Mail