Page 826«..1020..825826827828..840850..»

Category Archives: Transhuman News

Health tips from Dr. Oz and Dr. Roizen for 8-17-21 – The Dispatch – The Commercial Dispatch

Posted: August 18, 2021 at 7:48 am

Attitude and action to win over this past years challengesLive long and prosper. That famous line from the Vulcan Mr. Spock (played by Leonard Nimoy) should be your motto for the coming year. And heres how to do it despite the recent news about just how tough its been.

A study that looked at 29 folks, ages 90 to 100, uncovered two powerful secrets to longevity: acceptance of and recovery from things you cant change and an impulse to fight for the things you can alter. This is valuable information especially now that life expectancy in the U.S. is falling.

COVID-19 contributed to a decline in life expectancy from age 78.8 in 2019 to age 77.3 in 2020, according to the National Center for Health Statistics. In addition, more than 93,000 people died from drug overdoses a 30 percent increase over 2019. Homicides and deaths from diabetes and chronic liver disease also made major dents in longevity.

So what can you do to buck this trend?1. Get vaccinated pronto. 100 percent of the deaths from COVID-19 in June in Maryland were among nonvaccinated people.

2. Reassert control over your health. See your doctor for checkups and tests, especially if you have diabetes or other chronic conditions and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Reach out to support groups if you have alcohol- or substance-related disorders or suicidal thoughts and behavior.

3. Revamp your nutrition and your physical activity routine. Nutrition influences everything from longevity to mood. Theres great guidance in Dr. Mikes book What to Eat When and at DoctorOz.com, click on OZtube/Body.

If you arent getting vaccinated for yourself do it for your pet!When John Legend did the ad This Shot Is Our Shot to encourage people to get a COVID-19 vaccine and then put his inoculation up online, he was thinking about all the heartache that could be prevented by protecting folks from contracting the sometimes-fatal infection. But we bet John and his wife Chrissy Teigen who posted info on her shot on Facebook didnt know what a huge benefit their inoculations would be to their bulldogs Pablo, Penny and Pippa and their poodle named Petey.

It turns out that when a pet owner gets COVID-19, 67 percent of housecats and 43 percent of dogs also become infected. Thats the conclusion of researchers from Canadas University of Guelph, who did a study of 48 cats and 54 dogs from 77 households in which an owner had been diagnosed with COVID-19. Their paper, presented at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 2021, found that while most infected pets were asymptomatic, 20 percent of the dogs experienced lack of energy and loss of appetite, a cough or diarrhea; 27 percent of cats ended up with a runny nose and difficulty breathing.

The researchers advice: If you get COVID-19, stay away from your pet, and dont allow it to sleep with you. Also smart: If you have COVID-19 in your house, keep your pet away from other people and pets. Once a cat or dog becomes infected, pet-to-pet and pet-to-human transmission cannot be ruled out say the researchers.

How to stay cool in a heat waveMartha and the Vandellas sang about the torment of a Heat Wave in their 1963 hit: Its like a heat wave/burnin in my heart/ Its like a heat wave/Its tearin me apart. They did a pretty good job of predicting the effect of the scorching temperatures the U.S. has been experiencing this summer.

At least 67 weather stations from Washington State through New Mexico have recorded their hottest temperatures ever, according to the National Weather Service. And as risky as that is for the earths and peoples future, it also poses an immediate threat to you. High temperatures can cause dehydration, heatstroke, heat exhaustion and heat cramps; strain the cardiovascular and respiratory systems; and even increase interpersonal conflict. Research also shows strong links between climate crises and development of depression, anxiety and PTSD. So how can you stay cool, calm and collected when its steamy outside?

BIG NEWS: Dont use an electric fan when the indoor air temperature is over 95 degrees. The breeze can actually cause your body to gain heat instead of losing it!

If you have air conditioning, use it or go to an air-conditioned building or cooling center. For locations, Google cooling centers (and the name of your town). And (duh!) wear lightweight, light-colored, loose-fitting clothing.

In a cool environment, drink a tall glass of plain water every couple hours. In the heat, have a water bottle with you and sip every 10-15 minutes. Nothing sugary.

Exercise (keep doing it!) indoors in a cool place.

Think, sweat, think sweat that may delay dementiaBrute strength: 6 feet 9 inch tall Game of Thrones actor Hafthor Bjornsson set a world deadlifting record by lifting 1,104 pounds. Brain power: Dr. Sho Yano has an IQ of 200, started college at age 9 and earned an M.D. and Ph.D. by the time he was 21.

Imagine if such brains and brawn were found in one person. Well, they can be in you! And you dont have to hold the worlds record in both strength and intelligence to get the benefits of that combination: a reduced risk of Alzheimers and a healthier cardio and respiratory system. So heres how to harness the benefits.

A study in the journal Neurology followed 1,978 people, average age 80, and found that doing simple cognitive exercises such as reading, writing letters, playing card games and doing puzzles may delay the onset of Alzheimers disease by up to five years. And brain workouts later in life not as a younger person are what delayed the participants cognitive decline.

While youre strengthening your brain, pay attention to your body. Another research team found that one year of moderate- to vigorous-intensity aerobic walking two to three times a week for 30 minutes gradually increasing to four to five times weekly with two sessions of high intensity improves cardiorespiratory fitness, cerebral blood flow, memory and executive function in folks with mild cognitive impairment. The researchers say that also may reduce your risk of Alzheimers. We say combine brains and brawn and youll have a win-win well into your 80s and 90s!

The alpha and omega-3 of a longer lifeAn adult male bear on Kodiak Island in Alaska eats more than 6,000 pounds of salmon a year; females gobble up about half of that. And without any bagels! Fortunately, to get the remarkable benefits of eating omega-3-rich foods, you only need to eat a 3- to 6-ounce serving of salmon regularly. Dr. Mike loves salmon burgers even for breakfast. For lunch or dinner, he adds olives and broccoli or grilled vegetables.

A new study in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition looked at data from blood tests on more than 2,200 people over age 65 for an average of 11 years. The researchers from The Fatty Acid Research Institute in the United States and colleagues in universities in the U.S. and Canada found that folks with high levels of omega-3 fatty acids in their blood saw an increase in life expectancy of almost five years. Thats a huge increase in longevity from simply enjoying incredibly tasty foods.

The alpha and omega-3 of your choices: In every 3.5-ounce serving, wild salmon has 2,260 milligrams, herring 2,366 milligrams, sardines 1,480 milligrams and anchovies 2,113 milligrams. Flaxseed delivers 7,260 milligrams per tablespoon; and chia seeds and walnuts dish up 5,060 milligrams and 2,570 milligrams per ounce respectively. The benefit of adding these foods (in human size portions) is clear. According to the study author: It reinforces the idea that small changes in diet in the right direction can have a much more powerful effect than we think, and it is never too late or too early to make these changes.

Shades of brain healthIn 1986, when Cyndi Lauper sang True Colors I see your true colors shining through/I see your true colors and thats why I love you/So dont be afraid to let them show she had no idea just how important it was for everyone to put those true colors on display on their breakfast, lunch and dinner plates! But a new study in the journal Neurology reveals the power of colorful fruits and vegetables to protect you from cognitive decline as you get older.

The study, led by renowned Harvard nutrition researcher Walter Willet, followed almost 50,000 men and women, average age 51 at the start of the study, for 20 years. It revealed that eating flavonoid-rich, colorful foods such as apples; celery; red, blue and purple berries and grapes; hot and sweet peppers; eggplant; plums; carrots; citrus fruits; and even thyme and parsley can reduce your risk for encroaching dementia by 20 percent.

The study found that taking in 600 milligrams of flavonoids a day is what it takes to help combat cognitive decline 3.5 ounces of strawberries dishes up around 180 milligrams; a medium apple, 113 milligrams. In the U.S., adults only get about 200 to 250 milligrams a day, just a bit above the study group with the lowest intake and greatest risk of cognition problems.

If you make an effort to increase your intake, youll gain flavonoids neuroprotection. They also turn out to be anti-inflammatory and anti-diabetic. So make your life a bowl full of cherries and other colorful flavonoid-rich foods.

Foods that damage your immune strengthKryptonite immobilizes Superman. Spider-Mans archenemy, Venom, changes from predator to weakling at the sight of a flame. And you? Well, it turns out certain foods have superpowers that weaken your immune system, transforming you from super-germ fighter to a target for everything from the common cold to COVID-19. The most immune-weakening consumables are:

Excess alcohol. Whether its a daily overdose or you binge once a week, youre increasing your risk for pneumonia and acute respiratory stress syndromes. That could potentially impact the outcome of COVID-19. It also leads to slower recovery from infection and post-op complications.

Too much salt. That causes a cascade of events, starting with the kidneys excreting excess sodium and ending with a reduction in your bodys ability to fight bacterial infections. As little as 6 extra grams a day has that effect. Your daily average should be below 3 grams a day.

Added sugar. As little as 3.5 ounces (thats in a 16-ounce Coke, a Big Mac and a slice of pecan pie) can reduce the ability of immune cells to neutralize bacteria for up to five hours.

Highly processed foods. Stripped of fiber, these alter the mix of microbes in your gut biome, where 70 percent to 80 percent of immune cells hang out, making them less able to battle viruses. Getting adequate fiber (25 to 30 grams daily) has been shown to strengthen your flu-fighting powers. Whole cereals, veggies and fruit, and beans are go-to sources plus they supply vitamins A and C, folate and bioactive compounds that also boost immune health.

Playing hooky from your statin? Look for some new alternativesThere are over 1 million students in the New York City public school system, and more than 22 percent of them are chronically absent from the classroom (pre-pandemic). Thats not good for their future. But even more adults around 50 percent fail to show up for their life-saving daily dose of a statin. Now, that really threatens their future.

Fortunately, there are new cholesterol-fighting medications that even your doc might not be aware of, according to a new JAMA Insights Clinical Update. So if youre not taking your prescribed statin or your lousy LDL cholesterol level is too high, ask about trying one of the following drugs on its own or with a statin. Most are covered by insurance if youre statin resistant or have had statin myopathy from two different statins.

PSCK-9 inhibitors. A monoclonal antibody administered by injection every two to four weeks, it reduces LDL by 50 percent to 60 percent and is well-tolerated. Check to see if your insurance covers it.Ezetimibe. An inexpensive generic, this cuts intestinal absorption of cholesterol and reduces LDL levels by 10 percent to 20 percent. Good in combo with a statin.

Bempedoic acid. It lowers LDL by about 20 percent with few side effects. Its not yet known how much it reduces the risk of atherosclerotic-related cardiovascular disease; check price and insurance coverage.

Icosapent ethyl. An omega-3 fatty acid that, when added to statin therapy for patients with high triglyceride levels, can reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk by 25 percent. Highly variable out-of-pocket cost.

As you age you may need fewer calories but more nutrientsThe worlds oldest magic trick, acetabula et calculi, reportedly dates back to early Rome. Today, its known as cups and balls and while there are endless variations, it all comes down to trying to figure out how small balls pop in and out of three upside-down cups unseen.

Making sure you get enough nutrition as you get older also requires a sleight of hand. You need extra nutrients to protect your strength, cognition, immune function and bone, eye and heart health, while you take in fewer calories daily. Here are four nutrients you should pack into every day.

Calcium: For bone health, aim for three servings a day of fat-free dairy, two servings daily of dark leafy greens like kale, spinach and collards. Also good: canned fish, like sardines.

Vitamin D: Get a good daily dose from fish such as salmon, mushrooms and fortified foods. Get your blood level checked: Most folks need a supplement too. It helps with immune function and bone strength.

Vitamin B12: Essential for nerve and blood cell health, its in fortified whole-grain cereals, lean meat and fish. A blood test will show if you need a supplement.

Protein: Whole grains and legumes, tofu, fish, nuts and lean poultry can deliver the protein you need to gain and maintain muscle mass and function. A 150- to 160-pound senior might need 65 to 70 grams daily. That could come from 6 ounces of salmon (40 grams), 3 ounces of white meat turkey (24 grams) and 1 cup of brown rice (5 grams).

The amazing power of diet to cool menopause hot flashesIn 2014, then 61-year-old Emma Thompson joked about her hot flashes as she accepted a best actress award from the National Board of Review for her role in Saving Mr. Banks: Its such a cold night. You know, its the first time Ive been actively grateful for the menopause. Sound familiar?

Around 85 percent of postmenopausal women say symptoms such as hot flashes, palpitations and insomnia define the months or years around the cessation of menstruation. Many just tough it out, because for years they were told to take hormone replacement therapy, then told, No, hormone therapy is too risky, then, that its really OK if done immediately after menopause and for no more than 10-20 years (the correct information in our opinion if you also take low-dose aspirin).

Too bad this new study, led by Physicians for Responsible Medicines founding president Neal Barnard, wasnt around sooner. Its a real game changer. During the 12-week study, the research published in the journal Menopause found that a plant-based diet, rich in soy, reduces moderate-to-severe hot flashes by 84 percent! Close to 60 percent of participants became totally free of moderate-to-severe hot flashes and women who experienced mild hot flashes saw them decrease by 79 percent.

The diet that produced these remarkable results was low-fat and vegan, based on fruits, vegetables, whole grains and legumes, reduced intake of added oils and fatty foods, and heres the kicker 1/2 cup of cooked non-GMO soybeans daily. In our humble opinion, this diet deserves to be adopted by any woman whos contending with menopause symptoms.

Mehmet Oz, M.D. is host of The Dr. Oz Show, and Mike Roizen, M.D. is Chief Wellness Officer and Chair of Wellness Institute at Cleveland Clinic. To live your healthiest, tune into The Dr. Oz Show or visit http://www.sharecare.com.

Continued here:
Health tips from Dr. Oz and Dr. Roizen for 8-17-21 - The Dispatch - The Commercial Dispatch

Posted in Human Longevity | Comments Off on Health tips from Dr. Oz and Dr. Roizen for 8-17-21 – The Dispatch – The Commercial Dispatch

Turtles Can Live From the Victorian Era up to Present; Reason Behind the Longevity of Turtles Explained – Science Times

Posted: at 7:48 am

In 2019, Guinness World Recordsawarded the "world's oldest animal on land" to a certain creature located in South Atlantic. The award was given to Jonathan, an enormous tortoise that had been living on the island of St. Helena for almost two centuries now.

Guinness World Records selected Jonathan as the winner of the title due to the tortoise being born during Queen Victoria's era way back in the 1830s. Jonathan was 80 years old when the famous ship Titanic sank, and by the time it got the world record, the tortoise was at its 187 years of age.

(Photo: Brady Knoll from Pexels)

Jonathan is an example of a creature under the family of turtles that had been recorded with staggering longevity. According to Florida SouthWestern State College biology expert and turtle ecologist Jordan Donini in a Live Sciencereport, sea turtles have a life span of 50 to 100 years, while box turtles are more enduring and can live beyond a century. Donini added that the maximum life span of most sea turtle species is still uncovered.

Turtles have the best longevity among the animal kingdom due to numerous biological and evolutionary explanations. In the Live Science interview, Arkansas State University reptile expert and physiology professor Lori Neuman-Lee said that in terms of evolution, the turtles have simply adapted to the common food chain activity that was being conducted for many years.

Some animals like snakes and raccoons are fond of turtle eggs, and the only way to escape this chain is for the turtles to pass down their genes. Along with procreation, turtles learned how to live longer than they do and breed consecutively.

The turtles' longevity in biological explanation, on the other hand, is much more complicated than their straightforward evolutionary history. According to Neuman-Lee, turtles are also composed of telomeres, a genetic material that houses genomes by acting as a protective cap on DNA's end strands or chromosomes.

ALSO READ: Congenital Heart Disease and Autism in Children Possibly Caused by Sperm Mutation in Older Men

The function of telomeres is to protect the chromosomes in case of cell division. However, these protective caps get smaller and degrade over time, creating an effect on the chromosomes and eventually halting DNA replication. What is devastating about this genetic process is that when DNA stops replicating, tumors and cell anomalies develop.

Telomeres in turtles, however, have a lower rate of decay. Compared to the protective caps in human chromosomes, the telomeres of turtles do not shorten quickly and can deflect any significant changes brought by a negative effect during DNA replication.

The turtles are not yet fully examined, and other factors that could explain their longevity are still a puzzle for experts. However, some scientific theories have been formulated regarding the turtle's long life. Through the series of experiments and observations, the scientists are able to build a hypothesis that will possibly help us understand the longevity of turtles in the future.

Among the investigations on the near-immortality feature of turtles is the recently published article in the journal arXiv, titled "Concurrent Evolution of Anti-Aging Gene Duplications and Cellular Phenotypes in Long-Lived Turtles."

RELATED ARTICLE: Plant-Animal Mutualism: Coevolution of Fruit Bats and Pepper Plants Linked to Biological Scent Sensory Ability

Check out more news and information on Biologyin Science Times.

See original here:
Turtles Can Live From the Victorian Era up to Present; Reason Behind the Longevity of Turtles Explained - Science Times

Posted in Human Longevity | Comments Off on Turtles Can Live From the Victorian Era up to Present; Reason Behind the Longevity of Turtles Explained – Science Times

Psychology has struggled for a century to make sense of the mind – Science News Magazine

Posted: at 7:48 am

One of the most infamous psychology experiments ever conducted involved a carefully planned form of child abuse. The study rested on a simple scheme that would never get approved or funded today. In 1920, two researchers reported that they had repeatedly startled an unsuspecting infant, who came to be known as Little Albert, to see if he could be conditioned like Pavlovs dogs.

Psychologist John Watson of Johns Hopkins University and his graduate student Rosalie Rayner viewed their laboratory fearfest as a step toward strengthening a branch of natural science able to predict and control the behavior of people and other animals.

At first, the 9-month-old boy, identified as Albert B., sat placidly when the researchers placed a white rat in front of him. In tests two months later, one researcher presented the rodent, and just as the child brought his hand to pet it, the other scientist stood behind Albert and clanged a metal rod with a hammer. Their goal: to see if a child could be conditioned to associate an emotionally neutral white rat with a scary noise, just as Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov had trained dogs to associate the meaningless clicks of a metronome with the joy of being fed.

Pavlovs dogs slobbered at the mere sound of a metronome. Likewise, Little Albert eventually cried and recoiled at the mere sight of a white rat. The boys conditioned fear wasnt confined to rodents. He got upset when presented with other furry things a rabbit, a dog, a fur coat and a Santa Claus mask with a fuzzy beard.

Crucial details of the Little Albert experiment remain unclear or in dispute, such as who the child was, whether he had any neurological conditions and why the boy was removed from the experiment, possibly by his mother, before the researchers could attempt to reverse his learned fears. Also uncertain is whether he experienced any long-term effects of his experience.

Although experimental psychology originated in Germany in 1879, Watsons notorious study foreshadowed a messy, contentious approach to the science of us that has played out over the last 100 years. Warring scientific tribes armed with clashing assumptions about how people think and behave have struggled for dominance in psychology and other social sciences. Some have achieved great influence and popularity, at least for a while. Others have toiled in relative obscurity. Competing tribes have rarely joined forces to develop or integrate theories about how we think or why we do what we do; such efforts dont attract much attention.

But Watson, who had a second career as a successful advertising executive, knew how to grab the spotlight. He pioneered a field dubbed behaviorism, the study of peoples external reactions to specific sensations and situations. Only behavior counted in Watsons science. Unobservable thoughts didnt concern him.

Even as behaviorism took center stage Watson wrote a best-selling book on how to raise children based on conditioning principles some psychologists addressed mental life. American psychologist Edward Tolman concluded that rats learned the spatial layout of mazes by constructing a cognitive map of their surroundings (SN: 3/29/47, p. 199). Beginning in the 1910s, Gestalt psychologists studied how we perceive wholes differently than the sum of their parts, such as, depending on your perspective, seeing either a goblet or the profiles of two faces in the foreground of a drawing (SN: 5/18/29, p. 306).

And starting at the turn of the 20th century, Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, exerted a major influence on the treatment of psychological ailments through his writings on topics such as unconscious conflicts, neuroses and psychoses (SN: 7/9/27, p. 21). Freudian clinicians guided the drafting of the American Psychiatric Associations first official classification system for mental disorders. Later editions of the psychiatric bible dropped Freudian concepts as unscientific he had based his ideas on analyses of himself and his patients, not on lab studies.

Shortly after Freuds intellectual star rose, so did that of Harvard University psychologist B.F. Skinner, who could trace his academic lineage back to Watsons behaviorism. By placing rats and pigeons in conditioning chambers known as Skinner boxes, Skinner studied how the timing and rate of rewards or punishments affect animals ability to learn new behaviors. He found, for instance, that regular rewards speed up learning, whereas intermittent rewards produce behavior thats hard to extinguish in the lab. He also stirred up controversy by calling free will an illusion and imagining a utopian society in which communities doled out rewards to produce well-behaved citizens.

Skinners ideas, and behaviorism in general, lost favor by the late 1960s (SN: 9/11/71, p. 166). Scientists began to entertain the idea that computations, or statistical calculations, in the brain might enable thinking.

At the same time, some psychologists suspected that human judgments relied on faulty mental shortcuts rather than computer-like data crunching. Research on allegedly rampant flaws in how people make decisions individually and in social situations shot to prominence in the 1970s and remains popular today. In the last few decades, an opposing line of research has reported that instead, people render good judgments by using simple rules of thumb tailored to relevant situations.

Starting in the 1990s, the science of us branched out in new directions. Progress has been made in studying how emotional problems develop over decades, how people in non-Western cultures think and why deaths linked to despair have steadily risen in the United States. Scientific attention has also been redirected to finding new, more precise ways to define mental disorders.

No unified theory of mind and behavior unites these projects. For now, as social psychologists William Swann of the University of Texas at Austin and Jolanda Jetten of the University of Queensland in Australia wrote in 2017, perhaps scientists should broaden their perspectives to witness the numerous striking and ingenious ways that the human spirit asserts itself.

Headlines and summaries of the latest Science News articles, delivered to your inbox

Thank you for signing up!

There was a problem signing you up.

Todays focus on studying peoples thoughts and feelings as well as their behaviors can be traced to a cognitive revolution that began in the mid-20th century.

The rise of increasingly powerful computers motivated the idea that complex programs in the brain guide information processing so that we can make sense of the world. These neural programs, or sets of formal rules, provide frameworks for remembering what weve done, learning a native language and performing other mental feats, a new breed of cognitive and computer scientists argued (SN: 11/26/88, p. 345).

Economists adapted the cognitive science approach to their own needs. They were already convinced that individuals calculate costs and benefits of every transaction in the most self-serving ways possible or should do so but cant due to human mental limitations. Financial theorists bought into the latter argument and began creating cost-benefit formulas for investing money that are far too complex for anyone to think up, much less calculate, on their own. Economist Harry Markowitz won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1990 for his set of mathematical rules, introduced in 1952, to allocate an investors money to different assets, with more cash going to better and safer bets.

But in the 1970s, psychologists began conducting studies documenting that people rarely think according to rational rules of logic beloved by economists. Psychologists Daniel Kahneman of Princeton University, who received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2002, and Amos Tversky of Stanford University founded that area of research, at first called heuristics (meaning mental shortcuts) and biases.

Kahneman and Tversky popularized the notion that decision makers rely on highly fallible mental shortcuts that can have dire consequences. For instance, people bet themselves into bankruptcy at blackjack tables based on what they easily remember big winners rather than on the vast majority of losers. University of Chicago economist Richard Thaler applied that idea to the study of financial behavior in the 1980s. He was awarded the 2017 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his contributions to the field of behavioral economics, which incorporated previous heuristics and biases research. Thaler has championed the practice of nudging, in which government and private institutions find ways to prod people to make decisions deemed to be in their best interest.

Better to nudge, behavioral economists argue, than to leave people to their potentially disastrous mental shortcuts. Nudges have been used, for instance, to enroll employees automatically in retirement savings plans unless they opt out. That tactic is aimed at preventing delays in saving money during prime work years that lead to financial troubles later in life.

Another nudge tactic attempts to reduce overeating of sweets and other unhealthy foods, and perhaps rising obesity rates as well, by redesigning cafeterias and grocery stores so that vegetables and other nutritious foods are easiest to see and reach.

As nudging gained in popularity, Kahneman and Tverskys research also stimulated the growth of an opposing research camp, founded in the 1990s by psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer, now director of the Harding Center for Risk Literacy at the University of Potsdam in Germany (SN: 7/13/96, p. 24).

Gigerenzer and colleagues study simple rules of thumb that, when geared toward crucial cues in real-world situations, work remarkably well for decision making. Their approach builds on ideas on decision making in organizations that won economist Herbert Simon the 1978 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences (SN: 10/21/78, p. 277).

In the real world, people typically possess limited information and have little time to make decisions, Gigerenzer argues. Precise risks cant be known in advance or calculated based on whats happened in the past because many interacting factors can trigger unexpected events in, for example, ones life or the world economy. Amid so much uncertainty, simple but powerful decision tactics can outperform massive number-crunching operations such as Markowitzs investment formula. Using 40 years of U.S. stock market data to predict future returns, one study found that simply distributing money evenly among either 25 or 50 stocks usually yielded more money than 14 complex investment strategies, including Markowitzs (SN Online: 5/20/11).

Unlike Markowitzs procedure, dividing funds equally among diverse buys spreads out investment risks without mistaking accidental and random financial patterns in the past for good bets.

Gigerenzer and other investigators of powerful rules of thumb emphasize public education in statistical literacy and effective thinking strategies over nudging schemes. Intended effects of nudges are often weak and short-lived, they contend. Unintended effects can also occur, such as regrets over having accepted the standard investment rate in a companys savings plan because it turns out to be too low for ones retirement needs. Nudging people without educating them means infantilizing the public, Gigerenzer wrote in 2015.

As studies of irrational decision making took off around 50 years ago, so did a field of research with especially troubling implications. Social psychologists put volunteers into experimental situations that, in their view, exposed a human weakness for following the crowd and obeying authority. With memories of the Nazi campaign to exterminate Europes Jews still fresh, two such experiments became famous for showing the apparent ease with which people abide by heinous orders and abuse power.

First, Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram reported in 1963 that 65 percent of volunteers obeyed an experimenters demands to deliver what they thought were increasingly powerful and possibly lethal electric shocks to an unseen person who was actually working with Milgram as punishments for erring on word-recall tests. This widely publicized finding appeared to unveil a frightening willingness of average folks to carry out the commands of evil authorities (SN: 8/20/77, p. 117).

A disturbing follow-up to Milgrams work was the 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment, which psychologist Philip Zimbardo halted after six days due to escalating chaos among participants. Male college students assigned to play guards in a simulated prison had increasingly abused mock prisoners, stripping them naked and denying them food. Student prisoners became withdrawn and depressed.

Zimbardo argued that extreme social situations, such as assuming the role of a prison guard, will overwhelm self-control. Even mild-mannered college kids can get harsh when clad in guards uniforms and turned loose on their imprisoned peers, he said.

Milgrams and Zimbardos projects contained human drama and conflict that had widespread, and long-lasting, public appeal. A 1976 made-for-television movie based on Milgrams experiment, titled The Tenth Level, starred William Shatner. A 2010 movie inspired by the Stanford Prison Experiment, simply called The Experiment, starred Academy Award winners Adrien Brody and Forest Whitaker.

Despite the lasting cultural impact of the obedience-to-authority and prison experiments, some researchers have questioned Milgrams and Zimbardos conclusions. Milgram conducted 23 obedience experiments, although only one was publicized. Overall, volunteers usually delivered the harshest shocks when encouraged to identify with Milgrams scientific mission to understand human behavior. No one followed the experimenters order, You have no other choice, you must go on.

Indeed, people who follow orders to harm others are most likely to do so because they identify with a collective cause that morally justifies their actions, argued psychologists S. Alexander Haslam of the University of Queensland and Stephen Reicher of the University of St. Andrews in Scotland 40 years after the famous obedience study. Rather than blindly following orders, Milgrams volunteers cooperated with an experimenter when they viewed participation as scientifically important even if, as many later told Milgram, they didnt want to deliver shocks and felt bad after doing so.

Data from the 1994 ethnic genocide in the African nation of Rwanda supported that revised take on Milgrams experiment (SN: 8/19/17, p. 22). In a 100-day span, members of Rwandas majority Hutu population killed roughly 800,000 ethnic Tutsis. Researchers who later examined Rwandan government data on genocide perpetrators estimated that only about 20 percent of Hutu men and a much smaller percentage of Hutu women seriously injured or killed at least one person during the bloody episode. Most Hutus rejected pressure from political and community leaders to join the slaughter.

Neither did Zimbardos prisoners and guards passively accept their assigned roles. Prisoners at first challenged and rebelled against guards. When prisoners learned from Zimbardo that they would have to forfeit any money theyd already earned if they left before the experiment ended, their solidarity plummeted, and the guards crushed their resistance. Still, a majority of guards refused to wield power tyrannically, favoring tough-but-fair or friendly tactics.

In a second prison experiment conducted by Haslam and Reicher in 2001, guards were allowed to develop their own prison rules rather than being told to make prisoners feel powerless, as Zimbardo had done. In a rapid chain of events, conflict broke out between one set of guards and prisoners who formed a communal group that shared power and another with guards and prisoners who wanted to institute authoritarian rule. Morale in the communal group sank rapidly. Haslam stopped the experiment after eight days. Its the breakdown of groups and resulting sense of powerlessness that creates the conditions under which tyranny can triumph, Haslam concluded.

Milgrams and Zimbardos experiments set the stage for further research alleging that people cant control certain harmful attitudes and behaviors. A test of the speed with which individuals identify positive or negative words and images after being shown white and Black faces has become popular as a marker of unconscious racial bias. Some investigators regard that test as a window into hidden prejudice and implicit bias training has become common in many workplaces. But other scientists have questioned whether it truly taps into underlying bigotry. Likewise, stereotype threat, the idea that people automatically act consistently with negative beliefs about their race, sex or other traits when subtly reminded of those stereotypes, has also attracted academic supporters and critics.

It has taken a public health crisis to stimulate a level of cooperation across disciplines within and even outside the social sciences rarely reached in the last century. After a long stretch of increasing longevity, life spans of Americans have declined in recent years, fueled by drug overdoses and other deaths of despair among poor and working-class people plagued by job losses and dim futures.

Economists, psychologists, psychiatrists, sociologists, epidemiologists and physicians have begun to explore potential reasons for recent longevity losses, with an eye toward stemming a rising tide of early deaths.

Two Princeton University economists, Anne Case and Angus Deaton, highlighted this disturbing trend in 2015. After combing through U.S. death statistics, Case and Deaton observed that mortality rose sharply among middle-aged, non-Hispanic white people starting in the late 1990s. In particular, white, working-class people ages 45 to 54 were increasingly drinking themselves to death with alcohol, succumbing to opioid overdoses and committing suicide.

Job losses that resulted as mining declined and manufacturing plants moved offshore, high health care costs, disintegrating families and other stresses rendered more people than ever susceptible to deaths of despair, the economists argued. A similar trend had stoked deaths among inner-city Black people in the 1970s and 1980s.

If Case and Deaton were right, then researchers urgently needed to find a way to measure despair (SN: 1/30/21, p. 16). Two big ideas guided their efforts. First, dont assume depression or other diagnoses correspond to despair. Instead, treat despair as a downhearted state of mind. Tragic life circumstances beyond ones control, from sudden unemployment to losses of loved ones felled by COVID-19, can trigger demoralization and grief that have nothing to do with preexisting depression or any other mental disorder.

Second, study people throughout their lives to untangle how despair develops and prompts early deaths. Its reasonable to wonder, for instance, if opioid addiction more often afflicts young adults who have experienced despair since childhood, versus those who first faced despair in the previous year.

One preliminary despair scale consists of seven indicators of this condition, including feeling hopeless and helpless, feeling unloved and worrying often. This scale has shown promise as a way to identify those who are likely to think about or attempt suicide and to abuse opioids and other drugs.

Deaths of despair belong to a broader public health and economic crisis, concluded a 12-member National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine committee in 2021. Since the 1990s, drug overdoses, alcohol abuse, suicides and obesity-related conditions caused the deaths of nearly 6.7 million U.S. adults ages 25 to 64, the committee found. Whether obesity is rarely or often associated with despair is an open question.

Deaths from those causes hit racial minorities and working-class people of all races especially hard from the start. The COVID-19 pandemic further inflamed that mortality trend because people with underlying health conditions were especially vulnerable to the virus.

Perhaps findings with such alarming public health implications can inform policies that go viral, in the best sense of that word. Obesity-prevention programs for young people, expanded drug abuse treatment and stopping the flow of illegal opioids into the United States would be a start.

Whatever the politicians decide, the science of us has come a long way from Watson and Rayner instilling ratty fears in an unsuspecting infant. If Little Albert were alive today, he might smile, no doubt warily, at researchers working to extinguish real-life anguish.

Scientists and journalists share a core belief in questioning, observing and verifying to reach the truth. Science News reports on crucial research and discovery across science disciplines. We need your financial support to make it happen every contribution makes a difference.

Read this article:
Psychology has struggled for a century to make sense of the mind - Science News Magazine

Posted in Human Longevity | Comments Off on Psychology has struggled for a century to make sense of the mind – Science News Magazine

What is the future of the Jews of South Africa? – The Jerusalem Post

Posted: at 7:48 am

The recent civil unrest in South Africa, which began in the Durban area and lasted from July 9 to 17, left 337 dead and extensive damage in its wake. Coincidentally, on July 29, 87 Jewish South Africans made aliyah on an Ethiopian Airlines flight.

South African Jewry, which at its peak half a century ago topped 120,000, has now dropped to 50,000, according to the Kaplan Centre at the University of Cape Town.

cnxps.cmd.push(function () { cnxps({ playerId: '36af7c51-0caf-4741-9824-2c941fc6c17b' }).render('4c4d856e0e6f4e3d808bbc1715e132f6'); });

In the aftermath of the unrest, JNF-Australia organized a Zoom webinar on August 2, titled, The future of South African Jewry, which it asked me to moderate. The panelists were two top entrepreneurs Reeva Forman and Mike Abel Dr. Daniel Israel, a family practitioner in Johannesburg, and Mary Kluk, national president of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies.

Dr. Israel said the coronavirus pandemic had hit the community hard, causing many deaths among the elderly and preventing communal gatherings. I think that COVID-19 is the biggest challenge we have as a community in South Africa, he said.

Abel posted an open letter to South African expats in July, slamming the schadenfreude among some and asking for their love, concern and support instead. Agreeing with Forman that Zuma flamed the unrest, he said, the firewood was poverty.

The firewood is a 35% unemployment level in South Africa, and 70% youth unemployment. That is not a sustainable situation, so while Daniel looks at Covid as being the crisis in our country, I look at unemployment as being the crisis in our country, and unless we unlock the economy and develop a sharing economy and an inclusive culture, we will not be able to fix the country. But I am confident that this new crisis has precipitated a new opportunity for South Africa.

Kluk, a resident of Durban, related how the community had rallied to provide food and supplies to the elderly and needy. I have to say that the situation feels normal again, and human beings are incredibly resilient and our community is remarkable, she said. Each one of us wakes up every day and hopes in some way to be a contribution... to rebuild our country.

Some 41% of Jews surveyed by the Kaplan Centre in 2019 said they were making plans to leave South Africa 51% to Israel, 12% to the UK, 10% to the US, 10% to Australia, 4% to Canada and 13% elsewhere.

In this issue, Johannesburg businessman Arnold Garber argues that despite the challenges, many Jews who are able to leave South Africa choose not to.

Tzippi Hoffman, who with Alan Fischer wrote a 1988 book titled, The Jews of South Africa: What Future?, told me, The community will eternally be singled out for their Zionist ties while celebrated for individual contributions to the South African mosaic. Id say that the attrition rate for Jews leaving speaks for itself. While current Covid practices in South Africa may fuel immigration rates, long-term communal longevity will likely circle back to feeling comfortable as practicing Jews with a Zionistic bent.

I was left with the feeling that despite their governments increasingly anti-Israel stance, the Jews remaining in South Africa still believe they have a future. It is a myth that ostriches stick their heads in the sand. Neither do South African Jews.

More here:
What is the future of the Jews of South Africa? - The Jerusalem Post

Posted in Human Longevity | Comments Off on What is the future of the Jews of South Africa? – The Jerusalem Post

How Fermented Food Works Its Magic on Your Gut – LIVEKINDLY

Posted: at 7:48 am

Culinary trends come and go, but it seems like fermented foods popularity is here to stay. Fermented food is easy to buy and simple to makeplus, its delicious, nutritious, and can help reduce kitchen waste. So, whether youre a die-hard sauerkraut enthusiast or a curious novice, you might be wondering what the fermentation process actually involves. How does the science work? And is fermented food and drink really as good for you as people say?

Natural fermentation dates back thousands of years to human prehistory, and some of the earliest evidence indicates that people have enjoyed fermented alcoholic beverages since at least 13,000 BC. But according to the outdoor museum Living History Farms, humans first forays into fermentation may go back even further than this.

Some of humanitys early attempts aimed to preserve easily-spoiled food sources such as dairy would have resulted in natural fermentation, producing yogurt. Its likely that North Africa was home to the first-ever yogurt makers, thanks to the regions high temperatures and the microflora already present in goat, sheep, camel, and cow milk.

In general, fermented foods are a central part of human history, and people have used the science of fermentation to produce everything from beer to bean curd. Today, fermentation as a natural preservative could even help reduce the worlds food waste at an industrial level if transformed into new and shelf-stable fermented products such as sauces and snacks.

Furthermore, the Good Food Institute (GFI) has said that fermentation could become the third pillar of alternative protein productionrevolutionizing the flavor, texture, appearance, and sustainability of plant-based meat, eggs, and dairy products in the coming years.

The chemical process of fermentation involves the breaking down of one substance into a simpler substance via enzymes. In food and beverage manufacture, fermentation can refer to any use of microorganisms to bring about desirable chemical changes in ingredients.

This could describe the brewing of alcohol, the preserving of food, or the development of new flavors. This is because fermentation can alter the taste and nutritional profile of staple ingredients along with their longevity.

The fermentation process itself occurs with the introduction of beneficial microorganisms (such as bacteria and yeast) to an ingredient, alongside the removal of oxygen. Temperature also plays a critical role, though this varies from recipe to recipe (and sometimes region to region).

For example, the majority of modern, home vegetable fermentation requires some time at room temperature for the enzymes to get to work before refrigeration. This then slows the process down and allows for further safe storage.

French chemist Louis Pasteur (yes, the process of pasteurization is named after him) first discovered the connection between yeast and fermentation in the mid-1800s. He thereby created zymology, the science of fermentation, as we know it today.

At this time, the process was purely a way to preserve and extend the longevity of stored food. Experts would not recognize its various health benefits until the early 1900s when Russian bacteriologist Elie Metchnikoff noted the relative unusual longevity of Bulgarian citizens for the time (up to 87 years).

Fermented food really is good for you, but the jury is still out on whether it can actually extend your life. As with all health foods, fermentation is not a cure-allbut it does give your stomachs natural bacteria (and thereby your immune system) a nutrient-dense and delicious boost.

Some research indicates that fermented foods can have antimicrobial, anti-carcinogenic, anti-allergenic, and blood-pressure-lowering effects. At the very least, the probiotics (or good bacteria) contained in foods like kombucha help your body digest and absorb other nutrients.

There are approximately 100 trillion bacteria in a persons intestinal system, and everyones microbiota is different. Humans relationship with this bacteria is symbiotic, and keeping your gut healthy (by taking exercise, avoiding stress, consuming less sugar, and eating probiotic foods) can have a direct, positive impact on your overall wellbeing, including mood.

Plus, fermented foods are rich in vitamins. Sauerkraut is high in fiber, iron, magnesium, calcium, and vitamins B, A, K, and C, while miso is rich in vitamins B, E, and K, plus folic acid and essential minerals.

In addition, fermented foods are simply easier for your body to digest. The fermentation process even makes ingredients such as soy and gluten (which many people have trouble digesting comfortably) more manageable. For example, tempeh is easier on the digestive system than processed tofu, and sourdough bread is better for those with a gluten sensitivity.

Simple fermentation techniques make preserving and flavoring fruit, vegetables, grain, nuts, and legumes easy. But there are a surprisingly large number of popular ingredients that already incorporate fermentation. In fact, you may have been eating fermented foods for your entire life without realizing.

One of the most popular foods of the moment is kombucha, a fermented tea-based drink that combines sugar with a symbiotic culture of bacteria and yeast (SCOBY). Its a far cry from sauerkraut, but the naturally fizzy beverage has that distinctive tang of fermentation.

The probiotic drink originated in 220 BC Northeast China (Manchuria) and was popular for its perceived healing benefits and tart flavor, much like today. However, its worth noting that a lack of regulation and empirical evidence casts some doubt on some bolder claims.

For example, some say that kombucha can help tackle health problems such as arthritis and depression. While fermented foods can be nutritiousand a well-balanced diet undeniably supports health improvementsthey are not a replacement for medical treatment.

Tempeh is another fermented product you may have consumed without realizing it. The traditional dish involves the inoculation of cooked soybeans with rhizopus mold to create a nutrient-dense loaf of mycelium. (Note: both miso and natt use fermented soybeans and live cultures.) Tempeh originates from Indonesia and makes an easy swap for tofu and other plant proteins.

Modern brunch staple sourdough is actually the single oldest form of leavened bread in human history. Much like the creation of yogurt, the first sourdough starter may have been created by accident. Sourdough bread is delicious and comes with several benefits that conventional bread does not, such as a lower glycemic index and reduced gluten.

DIY fermentation is simple, affordable, and satisfying. The easiest ingredients to ferment at home are fresh vegetables, as in dishes such as sauerkraut (cabbage and caraway seeds), kimchi (cabbage, radish, and spices), and beet kvass (beets, raisins, and sugar).

Lacto-fermented fruit and lacto-fermented veggies are also simple to make. They rely on naturally occurring lactobacillus bacteria for fermentation and taste tangy rather than vinegary. Fermented fruit is both sweet and sour, a perfect accompaniment to desserts, yogurt, and smoothies.

Sterilized jars, your desired fruit or vegetables, salt, and spices, are all you need for basic home fermentation. You can sterilize jars easily by washing and then drying them in a preheated oven for 15 to 20 minutes, or by boiling them thoroughly on the stove.

Cut your ingredients into small, even pieces, as preferred. For sauerkraut, many recipes suggest a salt rub to start off the cabbage. Once the shreds have separated from their own brine, its time to stir through the spices and place the mixture in jars. Remove all the oxygen by topping with cling film or a piece of parchment paper.

To learn more about fermenting (and pickling) at home, check out LIVEKINDLYs in-depth guide here. To find out about the need to prevent unnecessary food waste, read on here.

Read the rest here:
How Fermented Food Works Its Magic on Your Gut - LIVEKINDLY

Posted in Human Longevity | Comments Off on How Fermented Food Works Its Magic on Your Gut – LIVEKINDLY

The importance of people, trust and transparency in a digital workforce – Consultancy.com.au

Posted: at 7:48 am

As business and HR leaders get to grips with the post-pandemic workforce and workplace, Smart WFMs chief executive officer Jarrod McGrath says its all about putting people at the epicentre.

The chief executive officer of the international human capital management consultancy last week launched the second edition of The Digital Workforce, which leverages insights from businesses and HR leaders across the globe to paint a picture of a modern digital workforce.

The book includes a five-step workforce method to maximise the value of people its central theme in modern organisations, with interviews from the likes of T2 Tea Global People Director Georgegina Poulos, UKG CEO Aron Ain and Australian Payroll Association CEO Tracy Angwin.

Business and leaders in human resources are trying to understand what their workforce will look like and what will make their people tick post pandemic, and that needs to go far beyond the flexibility buzzword, said McGrath, who has worked in the space for decades.

There are deeper, more difficult to measure ideas leaders need to get across to connect with a modern workforce, such as trust and transparency. These are relevant people may trust some parts of their working experience and not others. To make it holistic, transparency must extend to areas like diversity and inclusion, and emerging technologies such asAI which are causing fear over peoples role in the workforce.

The Digital Workforce emphasizes the importance of wellbeing throughout, highlighting that a traditionally narrow focus has impeded organisations ability to leverage tech and their workplace environments to promote a broader sense of wellbeing, whether that be physical, mental, social, financial, intellectual or emotional wellbeing.

I think the focus on mental health, wellbeing, the real self, the whole self, will continue into the future, said T2s Poulos.

The office was a place to go to work; its four walls provided a physical space entirely devoted to work. Now, the home has become the gym, the office, the movie theatre, the kids playground, the hospital, the kitchen, the restaurant, you name it. I think what we really need to focus on now is redefining the boundaries of the home and work within this flexible environment, and figuring out how they come together to support wellbeing as well as business success.

The book also recommends businesses meet growing demand from workforces to have a stance on world longevity. I think people want to work for a place that makes a difference not just inside the company walls, but also in the broader community, said UKGs Ain.

Their own expectations are they want to make a difference in their communities and the world. Social tools make that much easier to do. Its impacting philanthropy, its impacting volunteerism, its impacting how people spend their time.

To help businesses adapt tothe digital hybrid workforce and to ensure investments in workforce management initiatives are valuable, the book provides a five-step workforce method: align, prepare, track, implement, and measure.

This book is about changing the way we think about the workforce, creating workforce initiatives that work, and not only understanding peoples passions, but weaving those passions into the very fabric of the organisation, added McGrath. As we hit the reset button on how we live, work and interact, theres never been a better time to change our approach and create more successful organisations that have people at the epicentre of everything they do.

The Digital Workforce is available in print, virtual and audio copy on this website. A percentage of book sales will be donated to Australian Indigenous education as part of the Pledge 1% initiative.

Read more:
The importance of people, trust and transparency in a digital workforce - Consultancy.com.au

Posted in Human Longevity | Comments Off on The importance of people, trust and transparency in a digital workforce – Consultancy.com.au

Lumenlabs Far-UVC Disinfection System Protected Tokyo Olympic Athletes from Ongoing Coronavirus Threat – PR Web

Posted: at 7:48 am

Lumenlabs

SAN DIEGO (PRWEB) August 17, 2021

The historic Tokyo Olympics began with strict constraints to prevent the spread of highly infectious coronavirus variants. To protect the health of their athletes from the threat of airborne pathogens, the Chinese national team relied on patent pending Lumenizer filtered Far-UVC light technology, announced Scott Gant, Lumenlabs, LLC President and Co-Founder.

Lumenizer germicidal fixtures are protected by patent pending technology and trade secrets that are revolutionary breakthroughs in the human-safe application of Far-UVC light, Gant stated. The Covid-19 pandemic and emerging variant viruses has created a growing $34 billion dollar market for proactive disinfection. The Lumenizer disinfection system represents a safe and effective 222nm Far-UVC application for occupied areas. Our Lumenlabs team brings this lifesaving and revolutionary technology to market through a network of global dealers and strategic partnerships.

Postponed a year due to the Covid-19 pandemic, in 2021 Tokyo Olympics officials established a wide range of public health measures from vaccines to quarantines and masking to sanitation and attendance restrictions. In addition to having all of their Olympic athletes and staff vaccinated, to provide a comprehensive layer of protection, the Chinese national team installed advanced Lumenlabs Lumenizer far ultraviolet disinfection light fixtures throughout their housing and training facilities.

Developed by Lumenlabs, LLC, a global company with R&D centers in the United States and China, Lumenizer filtered Far-UVC 222nm light technology provides effective, automated and continuous disinfection of occupied spaces. Human-safe Lumenizer disinfection is proven to be 99.9% effective at deactivating airborne viruses and bacteria, achieved as the pathogens lose activity and cannot regenerate.

In 2013, the Radiology Research Center at the Columbia University School of Public Health discovered that extreme ultraviolet light can be used to eliminate airborne microorganisms such as viruses and bacteria. Experiments were conducted to prove the efficacy and safety. In 2018, Dr. David Brenner published a paper in the authoritative scientific journal Nature confirming that 222nm far ultraviolet light rays do not harm the skin and eyes.

For decades conventional germicidal UV light, emitting around 254nm, has been used to disinfect critical unoccupied spaces such as hospital surgery theaters. UV light is well-established as a highly efficient anti-microbial against bacteria and viruses, however, it cannot be used when people are present because higher wavelengths penetrate more deeply into tissues potentially causing damage to the skin and eyes. Far-UVC emits lower wavelengths than traditional UVC with a peak at 222nm that does not penetrate the human dead skin layer or the eye tear layer.

Compact and easy to install, the Lumenizer model 300 germicidal fixture features 60W input power, an efficient and powerful Far-UVC output with a patent pending tilting bulb ceiling or wall mount that uniformly disinfects air and surfaces of 172 ft area (16 meters). Three ultra-high purity quartz glass bulbs with a patent pending Lumenlabs light source design optimize the efficacy of Far-UVC generation. A built-in 100-layer nano coated filter provides the highest Far-UVC pass rate and the blockage of harmful UV. Other features include an innovative high-voltage high-frequency driver, compact design, automated instant start, replaceable bulb, cost efficiency, longevity and safety, and is ozone neutral and mercury free.

For more information on Lumenlabs, LLC and Lumenizer disinfection system applications for your business and community, visit Lumenlabs.com.

About Lumenlabs, LLC

Dedicated to creating a healthier future, Lumenlabs, LLC is a global company with a synergistic wealth of advanced technological, manufacturing, supply chain management and marketing expertise. The Lumenizer disinfection system is protected by patent pending technology and trade secrets that represent major breakthroughs in the human-safe application of Far-UVC light. The Lumenlabs team is driven to create innovative filtered Far-UVC solutions that provide safe and effective continuous sanitation for the spaces where people work, study, live or play. For more information, visit lumenlabs.com or email contact@lumenlabs.com.

For safety and efficacy published papers go to Lumenlabs.com/resources.

Follow Lumenlabs, LLC on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Share article on social media or email:

See the article here:
Lumenlabs Far-UVC Disinfection System Protected Tokyo Olympic Athletes from Ongoing Coronavirus Threat - PR Web

Posted in Human Longevity | Comments Off on Lumenlabs Far-UVC Disinfection System Protected Tokyo Olympic Athletes from Ongoing Coronavirus Threat – PR Web

Red Lines: Political Cartoons and the Struggle Against Censorship – The Diplomat

Posted: at 7:44 am

Advertisement

Cartoons are a powerful tool of political speech. Combining journalism, art, and often satire, political cartoons are all the more powerful because of their accessibility. That also makes them a threat to politicians in democracies and autocracies alike. In their new book, Red Lines: Political Cartoons and the Struggle Against Censorship, Cherian George, a professor of media studies at Hong Kong Baptist Universitys journalism department, and cartoonist Sonny Liew illustrate (literally) the power of political cartoons by explaining the various motivations and methods of cartoon censorship across the world. In the interview below, George share insights about how censorship differs across political contexts and why cartoons are so powerful.

What is unique or special about the political cartoon medium?

Political cartoons are a cross between journalism, art, and satire. At their best, political cartoons combine the public purpose of journalism, the emotive impact of art, and the democratizing effect of satire. Of course, not all political cartoons reach these levels. As with other forms of journalism, many are mediocre. Some are toxic.

The impulse to cartoon seems universal, even if the freedom to do so isnt. Its such a basic and low-cost medium for commentary that you can find it everywhere. And it has a long history. So if, like me, you are interested in censorship, political cartoons are an illuminating type of journalism to study.

Governments of all stripes engage in different forms of censorship. What are some of the myriad reasons or motivations for censorship?

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

Well, lets start with reasons that dont apply to cartoons: to block exposs of corruption or state secrets. Unlike investigative reporters, political cartoonists arent really in the business of unearthing things that people dont know. Instead, cartoons often crystallize what the public already knows or feels, or make people look at known facts in a new way.

What seems to irritate leaders with an authoritarian disposition is that cartoons embolden citizens. Its like the fable of the boy who points out that the emperor has no clothes. You cannot unsee it. Confident leaders know that satire comes with the territory, and is a strength of an open society. But there are also many self-important leaders who really cannot abide being laughed at.

Get briefed on the story of the week, and developing stories to watch across the Asia-Pacific.

There is of course a quite different category of censorship, which is about protecting the dignity of various identity groups racial, religious, gender, and so on. Under international human rights law, states actually have an obligation to prohibit expression that amounts to incitement to discrimination or violence against communities that are too weak to protect themselves in unregulated debate. We could call this good censorship. But although the moral and legal principles are quite clear, implementing them in a just manner is an extremely complex and controversial exercise. Around half of our book focuses on such controversies.

How does censorship differ in authoritarian, semi-authoritarian, and democratic societies?

There is problematic censorship everywhere, but the agents and methods of censorship differ depending partly on the political system. Liberal democracies have checks and balances to stop governments from censoring public discourse, so cartoonists there almost never have to worry about the state. In more authoritarian settings, governments can and do use repressive laws against cartoonists. Even more intimidating is the use of extra-legal tools by various groups, ranging from violence by paramilitaries to harassment by online mobs. In many settings, cartoonists cannot count on the rule of law to protect them from peoples outrage.

Cartoonists everywhere also contend with market censorship. This refers to the biases of capitalist media. The most obvious form is when news organizations refuse to publish something critical of a major advertiser or investor, or something that they fear will generate a strong consumer backlash. When editors exercise purely independent judgment, and decide that a cartoon does not meet the publications standards, I wouldnt call that censorship. Its editorial judgment. But if they go against their own better judgment because they fear the market, thats a problem. Another kind of market censorship is when good public interest media shrink or die, leaving fewer outlets for professional cartoonists.

People who are ideologically wedded to the idea that free markets equal media freedom have a hard time accepting that market censorship is a thing. But it is a universal concern of political cartoonists indeed, of all professional journalists regardless of the political system they work within.

What role did Malaysian cartoonist Zunar play in the downfall of Najib Razak? What does his story tell us about the power of cartoons?

It takes a village to keep democracy alive, and many brave individuals and groups played a part in challenging Malaysias former premier, even when it seemed like he was too rich to fail. In the media sector, Sarawak Report and The Edge come to mind. Their investigative journalism helped to expose the massive corruption that was taking place.

But the struggle was never about just facts and figures, or hard evidence. UMNO was a hegemonic party, the only rulers Malaya had known since 1957. They were the natural, taken-for-granted leaders of the Malay majority. Making their ouster thinkable required years of counter-ideological work by politicians, activists, artists, humorists. Zunar contributed to this effort.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

Its not just that Zunars cartoons were so clever and on-point. Our book presents Zunar as a performance artist, because he is exceptionally talented in the improvisational art of making censorship backfire on his censors. There was nothing that Najib and his government did to Zunar that the cartoonist couldnt turn into an opportunity to mock his oppressor.

Ive seen this happen with other cartoonists as well. Often, its not really about the power of their cartoons. It is more about their own relative powerlessness. When the public sees these defenseless individuals stand up to the most powerful men in the land, it can be very inspiring; and when these powerful men lash out against a cartoonist, that is not a good look.

Unequal battle: Malaysias former Prime Minister Najib Razak versus cartoonist Zunar, as depicted in Red Lines. Credit: Cherian George and Sonny Liew

In discussing China, you mention political scientist Margaret Roberts as saying that modern Chinese censorship uses a blend of fear, friction, and flooding. Can you explain those three tactics?

We normally associate despotic media control with the use of state coercion to create a culture of fear. But researchers looking at China and other modern authoritarian regimes have found that this is not their only or even main form of control. Instead of attempting total bans, which are rarely watertight anyway, states can just make it harder for citizens to access the unapproved content.

The Great Firewall is the classic example. Chinas walled garden is not totally impervious, but it creates enough friction to make it not worth the while of most citizens to look for taboo content. Another example of friction is when governments, in cahoots with internet service providers, slow down speeds during sensitive periods to make it harder to share videos. Users often cant be sure why they are experiencing difficulties, which suits the authorities fine. Governments normally prefer their interventions to be invisible.

Flooding, meanwhile, involves pumping propaganda, or just irrelevant content, into cyberspace to distract from oppositional messages. This strategy suits what some call the attention economy a world where the resource that is most scarce is not information as such but peoples attention. In an environment of attention scarcity, states dont need to apply traditional censorship to manipulate public opinion. They can just drown messages they dont like in a sea of other content.

Art is incredibly powerful, and some would argue that with such power comes responsibility. Where does the responsibility lie to not cause harm through political cartoons? What kind of restrictions are reasonable? Can this question even be answered or will cartoonists always be pushing boundaries even as societies continue to evolve?

The cartoonists I interviewed have an ethos similar to other journalists. They absolutely accept that their responsibility to society is more important than whatever ego gratifications they derive from their art. They exercise self-restraint when they think its necessary. Its not as if all cartoonists have this irrepressible urge to draw the first thought that comes to mind. There are professional cartoonists who will agonize over whether an idea for a provocative cartoon crosses the line into gratuitous offense, even if they have the freedom to draw whatever they like.

There are of course always people who will disagree sometimes violently, unfortunately with the cartoonists judgment. And there are many cases where it is very, very difficult to come to a consensus. Drawings are more open to interpretation than words. This is a strength as well as a liability.

Read more from the original source:
Red Lines: Political Cartoons and the Struggle Against Censorship - The Diplomat

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Red Lines: Political Cartoons and the Struggle Against Censorship – The Diplomat

PayPal and the ADL: A Match Made in Censorship Hell – Jacobin magazine

Posted: at 7:44 am

A few weeks ago, PayPal and the Anti-Defamation League announced a joint project focused on uncovering and disrupting the financial pipelines that support extremist and hate movements. As the ADLs CEO Jonathan Greenblatt explained, after first looking into how these movements use services like PayPal, the collaboration will aim to ultimately bar them from these platforms and starve them of funds, focusing on everyone from those who marauded through the Capitol to those who were beating up Jews in broad daylight just a few months ago. Sounds pretty uncontroversial. Who could possibly be against that?

Except the trouble, as it always is when it comes to measures like censorship, is that the people doing the censoring usually have a very different definition of what an extremist and hate movement is than you, the reader, does. For them, it might be someone who talks about revolution or eating the rich, someone who protested against police brutality last year, or simply groups and people that fight for the rights of Palestinians.

In fact, this exact thing has already happened once before with PayPal, which has been banning and cancelling the accounts of various groups and individuals over the last few years. In 2018, the company came under fire when, alongside its ban of the far-right Proud Boys, it also threw in the accounts of several anti-fascist groups for good measure. Just like when Reddit included a host of left-leaning subreddits in its purge of violent and hateful content last year, these platforms have a commercial interest in appearing to be equally opposed to extremists on both sides, even when one of those sides is violent racists like the Proud Boys and the other is people who oppose and confront those racists.

But PayPals partnership with the ADL threatens to go even further down this worrying road. The ADL, which was founded in 1913 as the Anti-Defamation League of Bnai Brith, has been on the right side of many issues related to racism and intolerance, but it also has a long history of acting as essentially an informal lobbying group for the Israeli government, and in the process conflating opposition to Israels apartheid policies with actual antisemitism as well as attacking the Left and skirting dangerously close to bigotry itself.

This history goes all the way back to the 1960s, when the ADLs then-leader attacked the famed civil rights group the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee over its anti-Zionist stance, charging it with extremism and ties to the Chinese-Soviet and now Arab propaganda machines, and putting it in the same league as the Ku Klux Klan. In the words, in 1961, of its national director, the ADL for many years has maintained a very important, confidential investigative coverage of Arab activities and propaganda and an information-gathering operation since 1948 focusing on Arab state organizations and groups. By 1993, a police raid on its California headquarters found this surveillance went much, much further, encompassing more than six hundred mostly liberal organizations, including the NAACP, ACLU, and the International Indian Treaty Council.

But thats ancient history by now, right? Unfortunately not. Under its former president Abe Foxman, with whom the ADL was virtually synonymous for years, the organization began increasingly embracing Washingtons Islamophobic war on terror and subsuming its stated principle of ensuring a world in which no group or individual suffers from bias, discrimination or hate to the more central goal of defending Israeli apartheid and maintaining the government connections to do so.

When the Right freaked out over the intentionally misnamed Ground Zero mosque a classic case of right-wing cancel culture, targeting a planned Islamic cultural center with a pool and basketball court that was to be built two blocks away from where the Twin Towers had stood Foxman sided with them. Just as survivors of the Holocaust are entitled to feelings that are irrational, he said to widespread condemnation, September 11 victims families anguish entitles them to positions that others would categorize as irrational or bigoted. On the ADLs one-hundred-year anniversary, Foxman claimed that Jews had it worse than Muslims and that anti-Muslim hatred didnt happen after September 11, before explaining that Rep. Peter Kings call for more surveillance of Muslims was a natural response, and blaming Muslim communities that have been brought in and are not assimilating.

Fittingly, the ADL never said a thing about the NYPDs outrageous spying on Muslim New Yorkers, and actually bestowed an award on the man who had overseen it. He was one of the officers who had been trained in the counterterrorism exchange program with Israel that the ADL has sponsored since 2004, educating US police in the tactics used by the countrys abusive security services. For the ADL, a commitment to the defense of the Israeli government came to supersede all other considerations, as when Foxman opposed a congressional resolution to finally label the Turkish slaughter of 1.5 million Armenians a genocide a stance the ADL reportedly adopted to protect Israels strategic relationship with Turkey.

During this period, the ADL often set its sights and energies not so much on white supremacists and neo-Nazis but on liberal Jewish organizations critical of Israel and various college campus groups that organized around Palestinian justice. Among its semiregular list of the Top 10 Anti-Israel Groups in the U.S., it listed institutions like J Street, New Israel Fund, Code Pink, Jewish Voice for Peace, and the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights, a coalition of 380 organizations opposing Israeli apartheid, some of them Jewish, charging they were fixated with delegitimizing Israel and pushing a misleading narrative about the country.

It praised a 2010 Education Department decision to use the 1964 Civil Rights Act to protect Jewish college students from anti-Israel and anti-Zionist sentiment that crosses the line into anti-Semitism, compared a talk at Brooklyn College about boycotting Israel to the Ku Klux Klan holding an event about maintaining a white-dominated America, and denounced a Harvard conference on the idea of a one-state solution in which Jews and Palestinians would live together within a single state as the elimination of Israel as the national homeland of the Jewish people.

This regular conflation of Israel with all Jews everywhere, and the implication that the distinct interests of each were really one and the same, somehow coexists with the organizations practice of lobbing accusations of antisemitism at left-leaning targets over poorly phrased statements that could be interpreted as advancing the racist idea of dual loyalty. To wit, when former Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced he would be trying to torpedo Barack Obamas nuclear deal with Iran by delivering an outrageous speech to Congress as a representative of the entire Jewish people, the ADL didnt condemn this clearly antisemitic trope. Instead, it criticized J Street for asking Jews to sign a petition saying that Netanyahu doesnt speak for me, which Foxman called inflammatory and repugnant. Note that at the same time the ADL fixated on criticism of Israeli policies, and kept a laser focus on pop culture and obvious satire, it was deathly silent about the many, many stunningly racist things that actual Israeli officials regularly said out loud.

All of this was, of course, closely tied to Foxmans personal influence as the longtime, defining leader of the ADL. Perhaps it went away once he passed the torch to Greenblatt in 2015? Unfortunately, the record of the past few years hasnt borne this out. Sure, there were some shifts, like the Leagues belated acknowledgement that the Armenian genocide was, in fact, a genocide. But old habits die hard.

The ADLs often wildly inconsistent standards over who deserved condemnation remains. When Trump made a series of patently offensive statements to a group of Jewish donors in 2015 Im a negotiator like you folks; Is there anyone in this room who doesnt negotiate deals?; This room negotiates a lot. This room perhaps more than any room Ive ever spoken to Greenblatt declared that we do not believe that it was Donald Trumps intention to evoke anti-Semitic stereotypes. When asked point-blank a year later if Trump was an anti-Semite, Greenblatt replied: Absolutely not. In fact, hes been a very strong supporter of the State of Israel and of Jewish charitable causes generally.

Compare this to how Greenblatt and the ADL have led the charge against left-wing (and, incidentally, Muslim) members of Congress over phrasing that it construes as approximating antisemitic tropes, such as over Ilhan Omars demonstrably true point that oodles of money from pro-Israel groups have an impact on US policy in the Middle East. The League later played a leading role in getting college professor Marc Lamont Hill fired from CNN, dishonestly claiming his UN speech calling for a free Palestine from the river to the sea was calling for divisive and destructive action against Israel.

Or look at their campaign against Keith Ellison, now Minnesotas attorney general, when he was running for chair of the Democratic National Committee. After reporters dug up Ellisons 2010 comments that US foreign policy in the Middle East is governed by what is good or bad through a country of 7 million people, meaning Israel, Greenblatt called them deeply disturbing and disqualifying. Tellingly, he also referenced Ellisons positions on Israel-Palestine and the Iran deal, and charged that his words raised doubts about [his] ability to represent traditional Democratic support for Israel, suggesting that the ADLs concerns were about something other than antisemitic tropes. Greenblatt would later cite various left-wing groups criticism of Israel including a line in the Black Lives Matter platform written by a Jewish activist accusing it of genocide to charge that anti-Semitism is creeping into progressivism.

The ADL still regularly conflates activism against Israeli policies, especially on college campuses, with antisemitism, as when it accused Jewish Voice for Peace of increasing anti-Israel radicalism, or when it called the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement modeled on the boycott of apartheid South Africa an anti-Semitic movement motivated by irrational hatred of the Jewish people. When public sentiment toward Israel soured this year over the countrys shocking land grab and subsequent bombing of Palestinians, the ADL put out a widely cited report claiming an increase in antisemitism, which listed swastika graffiti and praise for Adolph Hitler alongside anti-Zionist slogans and comparisons of Israeli policies to Nazi Germany.

And it still veers away from its stated mission into nakedly representing Israeli interests, as when it condemned a UN resolution criticizing the countrys illegal settlements on Palestinian land in 2016, while later praising Trumps inflammatory move of the US embassy to Jerusalem. Fittingly, given its partnership with PayPal, at one point it even urged police to infiltrate and surveil antifa activists, before scrubbing the advice under criticism.

In short, the ADL is far from a dispassionate fighter against hate movements, and has consistently twisted or folded that mission into pro-Israel advocacy while conflating left-wing criticism of Israel and US policy toward it with far-right hatred and white supremacy. Greenblatts statement that its work with PayPal will look at groups across the ideological spectrum suggests pro-Palestinian and pro-BDS groups and individuals have much to fear from this partnership, the potential of which we saw eleven years ago, when PayPal froze the account of WikiLeaks under pressure from an irate US government.

Various political forces will continue to push for more and more censorship of the internet, and theyll cite white supremacists, neo-Nazis, and other widely reviled groups and figures to justify it, though they will only be some of the targets. And the more this push picks up steam, the more the Left has to fear from them.

The rest is here:
PayPal and the ADL: A Match Made in Censorship Hell - Jacobin magazine

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on PayPal and the ADL: A Match Made in Censorship Hell – Jacobin magazine

Censor: behind the screams on 2021s most striking horror film – NME

Posted: at 7:44 am

Horror films are so often about women, but, historically, horror stories on film have rarely been told by women. That has started to change in the last decade, with directors like Jennifer Kent (The Babadook), Anna Biller (The Love Witch), Karyn Kusama (The Invitation), Alice Lowe (Prevenge) and Rose Glass (Saint Maud) making eerie films about women who do much more than scream and cower. Joining that list of great female horror directors is Prano Bailey-Bond, whose feature debut, Censor, is one of the most striking British horrors in years.

Set in the 1980s, Censor takes place amid the furore over the Video Nasties. This broad group of horror films were banned by the British Board of Film Classification for being too obscene for the public. These days, many of those films Evil Dead, Suspiria, Dawn of the Dead look relatively tame (while some are even considered classics), but at the time it was believed that merely watching them would be enough to warp peoples minds and inspire copycat crimes.

Censor follows Enid (BAFTA-nominee Niamh Algar), an apparently level-headed censor who is shaken after she watches a movie that seems to echo the events that led to the disappearance of her sister. As Enid obsessively tries to find out more about the film, the line between reality and fantasy starts to blur.

Niamh Algar in Censor. CREDIT: Maria Lax / Magnet Releasing

I had the idea for Censor around 2012, Bailey-Bond tells NME. I was reading an article about Hammer Horror [the British studio that made the likes of Dracula, The Mummy and Curse of the Wolfman] which looked at how film censors worked in that period. It made me think, If violent images are meant to make us lose control, what prevents the censor from doing that? It was that hypocrisy of thinking, I can watch this, but if you watch it youre going to go out and shoot someone.

Censor could have been set at any time, but Bailey-Bond settled on the Video Nasty period because that era is fascinating and rich when it comes to our relationship with horror. The UK had one of the most conservative censorship bodies. This was a time when VHS was taking off: as more people than ever could watch films at home, prudish types were worried children would be taken over by something evil from the TV set. It was also a time of extreme conservatism in government: Margaret Thatcher was prime minister and the country was deeply divided as blame and fear pervaded.

The films 80s setting gives Bailey-Bond a fractious backdrop for her horror story. Enids own mind starts to fall apart as fear overtakes her, but the world around her is almost as irrational. There was a convenient scapegoating of anything terrible happening in the world, says Bailey-Bond of that era. Lets not look at the government or what theyre taking away from society Lets blame it all on a bunch of horror films.

Censor director Prano Bailey-Bond. CREDIT: Maria Lax / Magnet Releasing

Bailey-Bond was too young to be aware of Video Nasties at the time (she was born in 1982), but the 80s was also when she began her horror education. I grew up in the middle of nowhere in Wales, with my parents VHS shelf as my way into cinema, she says. They had really good taste, fortunately. There were lots of John Carpenter and David Lynch films. The youngest of three siblings, she was always keen to see what her older brother and sister were watching. I remember when I was in primary school they watched Twin Peaks and it was mind-blowing. Its not necessarily horror, but it was surreal and uncomfortable and bizarre and scary. I think that was a big influence on me. That influence took Bailey-Bond into an early career of directing short films and music videos, all with the same sinister beauty she brings to Censor.

If horror directed by women has only recently become more commonplace, Bailey-Bond says she was always aware that there were women in horror if you looked. One of my favourite films when I was a teenager was American Psycho, which at the time I didnt know was directed by a woman [Mary Harron]. And then there was Near Dark [Kathryn Bigelow]. There werent masses, but they have been there.

Bailey-Bond has watched on as the landscape has changed, with more and more women making horror films. When it came time for Bailey-Bond to shop around her idea for her directing debut, it wasnt so unusual anymore. The way were talking about gender and representation [now], that feels like its allowed a platform where were actually celebrating and lifting up female directors working in the genre more than we have in the past.

A meeting of the films censorship board. CREDIT: Magnet Releasing / Press

For the role of Enid, Bailey-Bond chose, by both fortune and accident, an actress who is ascending as quickly as her director. She and Niamh Algar actually met well before they started on Censor: in 2018 they were both included in Screen Internationals Stars of Tomorrow list, and were put on the same table at a dinner celebrating the honourees.

We just kind of hit if off, sitting and talking about movies, says Algar, who is nothing like Enid in real life. Where Enid is brunette, English and quiet, Algar is blonde, Irish and gregarious. About six months later, my agent sent me a casting and I saw Pranos name and immediately thought, Oh thats someone I want to work with.

For Algar, Censor caps a very strong couple of years career-wise. Shes played a lead role in the Ridley Scott TV series Raised By Wolves (and has already shot the second season) and she was BAFTA-nominated last year for her role in Calm With Horses. Although it wasnt strategised that way, adding Censor to her CV is a good way to show she has great taste in both big budget projects and indie movies. I always want to play characters that I suppose people wouldnt put me in the same box as, she says. The best compliment Ive had was when Mark Kermode said, Niamh Algar is a character actor. Yes! Theres certainly no doubting that Enid is a role that asks a lot of Algar. We wont spoil where the film goes, but Algar has to show a lot of different shades to Enid. It will be no surprise if it brings her a second BAFTA nomination.

One of the most striking things about Censor is that even though its set nearly 40 years ago, it could take place at almost any time. Censorship is something that always exists: there will always be people trying to police what others watch, out of fear dressed up as concern. On the day NME speaks to both Bailey-Bond and Algar, Twitter is aflame with pearl-clutching types objecting to Lil Nas X kissing his male back-up dancer at the BET Awards and doing a pixelated nude prison dance in his Industry Baby video.

I think there are parallels you can draw right now with the 80s, says Bailey-Bond. Weve seen these moments of hysteria happen over the years. In the 50s, it was comic books and people worried about their effect on little boys. More recently, weve had video games, Marilyn Manson videos and rap music.

There will always be someone insisting that we must think of the children. And hopefully there will always be someone like Prano Bailey-Bond to hold a mirror up to them and scare them into self-reflection.

Censor is out in UK cinemas on August 20

Originally posted here:
Censor: behind the screams on 2021s most striking horror film - NME

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Censor: behind the screams on 2021s most striking horror film – NME

Page 826«..1020..825826827828..840850..»