Page 800«..1020..799800801802..810820..»

Category Archives: Transhuman News

Calling Through the DNA Wire: A Newly Discovered Genetic Switch – SciTechDaily

Posted: September 2, 2021 at 2:18 pm

Illustration. Credit: Yuval Robichek, Weizmann Institute of Science

Proteins communicating through the DNA molecule constitute a newly discovered genetic switch.

Proteins can communicate through DNA, conducting a long-distance dialogue that serves as a kind of genetic switch, according to Weizmann Institute of Science researchers. They found that the binding of proteins to one site of a DNA molecule can physically affect another binding site at a distant location, and that this peer effect activates certain genes. This effect had previously been observed in artificial systems, but the Weizmann study is the first to show it takes place in the DNA of living organisms.

A team headed by Dr. Hagen Hofmann of the Chemical and Structural Biology Department made this discovery while studying a peculiar phenomenon in the soil bacteria Bacillus subtilis. A small minority of these bacteria demonstrate a unique skill: an ability to enrich their genomes by taking up bacterial gene segments scattered in the soil around them. This ability depends on a protein called ComK, a transcription factor, which binds to the DNA to activate the genes that make the scavenging possible. However, it was unknown how exactly this activation works.

(l-r) Dr. Nadav Elad, Dr. Haim Rozenberg, Dr. Gabriel Rosenblum, Jakub Jungwirth and Dr. Hagen Hofmann. Twisting a rope from one end. Credit: Weizmann Institute of Science

Staff Scientist Dr. Gabriel Rosenblum led this study, in which the researchers explored the bacterial DNA using advanced biophysical tools single-molecule FRET and cryogenic electron microscopy. In particular, they focused on the two sites on the DNA molecule to which ComK proteins bind.

They found that when two ComK molecules bind to one of the sites, it sets off a signal that facilitates the binding of two additional ComK molecules at the second site. The signal can travel between the sites because physical changes triggered by the original proteins binding create tension that is transmitted along the DNA, something like twisting a rope from one end. Once all four molecules are bound to the DNA, a threshold is passed, switching on the bacteriums gene scavenging ability.

We were surprised to discover that DNA, in addition to containing the genetic code, acts like a communication cable, transmitting information over a relatively long distance from one protein binding site to another, Rosenblum says.

A 3D reconstruction from single particles of bacterial DNA (gray) and ComK proteins (red), imaged by cryogenic electron microscopy, viewed from the front (left) and at a 90 degrees rotation. ComK molecules bound to two sites communicate through the DNA segment between them. Credit: Weizmann Institute of Science

By manipulating the bacterial DNA and monitoring the effects of these manipulations, the scientists clarified the details of the long-distance communication within the DNA. They found that for communication or cooperation between two sites to occur, these sites must be located at a particular distance from one another, and they must face the same direction on the DNA helix. Any deviation from these two conditions for example, increasing the distance weakened the communication. The sequence of genetic letters running between the two sites was found to have little effect on this communication, whereas a break in the DNA interrupted it completely, providing further evidence that this communication occurs through a physical connection.

Knowing these details may help design molecular switches of desired strengths for a variety of applications. The latter may include genetically engineering bacteria to clean up environmental pollution or synthesizing enzymes to be used as drugs.

Long-distance communication within a DNA molecule is a new type of regulatory mechanism one that opens up previously unavailable methods for designing the genetic circuits of the future, Hofmann says.

Reference: Allostery through DNA drives phenotype switching by Gabriel Rosenblum, Nadav Elad, Haim Rozenberg, Felix Wiggers, Jakub Jungwirth and Hagen Hofmann, 20 May 2021, Nature Communications.DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23148-2

The research team included Dr. Nadav Elad of Weizmanns Chemical Research Support Department; Dr. Haim Rozenberg and Dr. Felix Wiggers of the Chemical and Structural Biology Department; and Jakub Jungwirth of the Chemical and Biological Physics Department.

Dr. Hagen Hofmann is the incumbent of the Corinne S. Koshland Career Development Chair in Perpetuity.

Go here to see the original:
Calling Through the DNA Wire: A Newly Discovered Genetic Switch - SciTechDaily

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Calling Through the DNA Wire: A Newly Discovered Genetic Switch – SciTechDaily

The Worldwide DNA Vaccines Industry Should Reach $11.5 Billion by 2026 – Yahoo Finance

Posted: at 2:18 pm

DUBLIN, Sept. 1, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- The "DNA Vaccines: Technologies and Global Markets 2021-2026" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

Research and Markets Logo

The global market for DNA vaccines should grow from $3.1 billion in 2021 to $11.5 billion by 2026 with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 30.1% for the period of 2021-2026.

DNA vaccines market for research tools should grow from $2.2 billion in 2021 to $8.7 billion by 2026 with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 32.3% for the period of 2021-2026.

DNA vaccines market for clinical vaccines should grow from $924 million in 2021 to $2.8 billion by 2026 with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 24.5% for the period of 2021-2026.

Report Scope

The study's scope includes DNA vaccine products that already are commercialized or likely to be in the next five years. Both human and animal health markets are studied. DNA vaccine delivery technologies are also included. DNA vaccine candidates in clinical trials are examined by indication, and future market growth from 2021 through 2026 is forecast.

The role that DNA vaccines play in the overall vaccine industry is examined, as well as how the vaccine industry structure and dynamics are changing.

We examine DNA synthesis, biotechnology and pharmaceuticals firms, strategic industry alliances, and the role of gene delivery and synthesis technologies. The major markets for DNA vaccines, including infectious diseases, cancers, animal health, allergies and biodefense, are analyzed, and the main companies in these fields are highlighted.

The Report Includes

14 data tables and 55 additional tables

An overview of the global market for DNA vaccines and related technologies

Analyses of global market trends, with data from 2019, 2020, estimates for 2021, and projections of compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) through 2026

Coverage of delivery and synthesis technologies, the forces driving market growth, product formats, and market applications for these products

Identification of new opportunities, challenges, and technological changes within the industry and highlights of the market potential for DNA vaccines by delivery technology, format, function and region

Coverage of life cycle status and commercial status of DNA vaccine technologies and brief description of the Human Immune System

Details about vaccines, their evolution, and types including DNA vaccines and cancer DNA vaccines, their function, scope and clinical trials, and information on changing vaccine paradigm, antigen discovery, plasmid design and manufacture and delivery technologies

Detailed analysis of the current market trends, market forecast, and discussion of technological, and regulatory elements that are affecting the future marketplace

Information about major technologies for the formulation of DNA vaccines and assessment of their relation to biotechnology, gene therapy, DNA delivery, pharmaceuticals, and biodefense companies

Comprehensive profiles of leading companies in the field as well as updates to alliance, merger, and acquisition activities, including Astellas Pharma Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Merck & Co., Novartis AG, Pfizer Inc. and Sanofi-Aventisa

Vaccines, once a stable though unexciting sector of the pharmaceutical industry, are becoming an attractive growth opportunity. DNA vaccines are an emerging vaccine platform within this changing paradigm. DNA vaccines target a wide range of traditional pharmaceutical markets, such as cancers and allergies, as well as infectious diseases. The vaccine industry has proved that it can generate products with nontraditional applications and blockbuster potential. Products such as that from ViroCyt, now part of Sartorius Stedim Biotech, are leading the field of rapid virus quantification. DNA vaccines are poised to generate significant future market potential.

Story continues

New biotechnologies and nanotechnologies are driving DNA vaccine development. Particularly key to DNA vaccines reaching their potential are emerging delivery technologies such as electroporation (EP), innovative vaccine formats such as DNA prime-adenovector boost, and novel molecular adjuvant technologies. These technologies are providing the means for achieving the higher efficacy in humans that is required for the commercialization of DNA vaccines.

DNA vaccines have already made significant progress to date. There are three approved DNA vaccines for animal health applications and nearly 100 clinical trials underway in humans for a wide range of diseases. There is a deep pipeline of preclinical projects. A small but strategic market segment is commercial today, consisting of research tools and animal health applications.

The high growth is the result of a low starting base and a forecast introduction of several DNA vaccines late in the period. While research tools and animal health clinical applications currently dominate the market, human clinical DNA vaccines will make up the vast majority of this market through 2026.

Key Topics Covered:

Chapter 1 Introduction

Chapter 2 Summary

Chapter 3 Market Overview

Introduction

DNA Vaccine Technologies Covered in This Report

Global Market for DNA Vaccines

Forces Driving DNA Vaccine Market Growth

Life Cycle Status of DNA Vaccine Technologies

Commercial Status of DNA Vaccine Technologies

DNA Vaccine Industry

Chapter 4 DNA Vaccine Technologies

Introduction

Human Immune System

Vaccines

Evolution of Vaccines

Types of Vaccines

DNA Vaccines

Changing Vaccine Paradigm

Function and Scope of DNA Vaccines

Cancer DNA Vaccines

DNA Vaccine Technology Value Chain

Antigen Discovery

Plasmid Design

Plasmid Manufacture

Delivery Technologies

Uncomplexed pDNA

Electroporation

Liposomes

Gold Particles

Nanoparticles

Bacterial Ghosts

Bacteriophages

Viruses

Targeting Technologies

Adjuvant Technologies

DNA Vaccine Technology Needs

Chapter 5 DNA Vaccine Applications

Research Tool Applications

Clinical Application

Overview to DNA Vaccine Clinical Trials Process

Summary of DNA Vaccine Clinical Trials

Chapter 6 DNA Vaccine Industry

Vaccine Industry Structural Shifts

Industry Structure

DNA Vaccine Industry Competitors

DNA Vaccine Commercial Value Chain

DNA Vaccine Competitor Strategic Positioning

Research & Development

Chapter 7 DNA Vaccine Markets

Drivers of Growth

DNA Vaccine Markets

Market Forecasts

DNA Vaccine Research Tool Markets

DNA Vaccine Clinical Markets

DNA Vaccine Market by Region

Research Tools for DNA Vaccine Market by Region

Clinical DNA Vaccine Market by Region

Chapter 8 Impact of COVID-19

Vaccines, Treatments and Diagnostics

Vaccines

Therapeutics

Economic Impact of COVID-19

Chapter 9 Company Profiles

Astellas Pharma Inc.

Astrazeneca Plc

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

Gilead Sciences Inc.

Johnson & Johnson

Merck & Co.

Novartis Ag

Pfizer Inc.

Sanofi-Aventis

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/o8dxo1

Media Contact:

Read more:
The Worldwide DNA Vaccines Industry Should Reach $11.5 Billion by 2026 - Yahoo Finance

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on The Worldwide DNA Vaccines Industry Should Reach $11.5 Billion by 2026 – Yahoo Finance

DNA Explainer: Received your COVID-19 vaccine? Know what’s going on inside your body – DNA India

Posted: at 2:18 pm

After the dire misery of last year, vaccines have emerged as mankinds main weapon against the COVID-19pandemic. Governments all over the world are striving to get as many people vaccinated as fast as possible.

India has administered around 65 crore doses, with around 15 crore fully vaccinated individuals and 50 crore vaccinated with a single shot. If you're one of the vaccinated, theres a lot of information out there to give an idea of what exactly happens when the COVID-19 vaccine is injected into the body.

Here we talk about what is injected via a vaccine, what happens inside the body when it responds to the jab, why many people get some common side-effects and finally, why is there a need with several COVID-19 vaccines to get a second shot.

What happens when vaccine serum is injected into the body?

By definition, vaccine is a process of acquired immunity to fight off a future infection. Vaccines contain an agent resembling the virus, bacteria or parasite causing a disease, which in the case of COVID-19 is the SARS-COV-2 virus. It is either a weakened or dead microorganism, or its toxins or a surface protein. This agent carries the virus genetical material, which can then be read by the body to formulate the immune response.

When the vaccine is injected, the agent goes into the cells of our tissues. It captures the attention of certain 'dendritic' cells, which have a specific function to monitor intruders that may have entered the body. These patrolling cells come in contact with this new never-before-seen agent and alarm the body against it.

The dendritic cells do this by reading the genetic instructions about the virus carried into the body by the vaccine agent. The information is then replicated for the immune system to read and react.The cells travel to a lymph node to identify the right cells in the body and then activates them against the virus.

Why does the vaccine give side-effects to some people?

When it comes to vaccines, most side-effects literally mean that your immune system is responding as it is supposed to. With COVID-19 vaccines, common side effects range from soreness or swelling in the arm where the vaccine was injected, fatigue, headache, fever, chills, muscular pain and nausea.

Vaccines trick the immune system in believing that an actual pathogen has entered the body as it cannot tell the difference between the actual virus and a vaccine agent. The white blood cells rush to the spot to break down the virus and antibodies then attack the debris spread around from the breakdown. This makes the spot of injection akin to a tiny battlefield.

Fatigue and soreness after receiving the vaccine shot is due to cytokines and chemokines. These substances are directing more of the immune cells from other parts of the body to the infected site. This also causes inflammation and temporary swelling in lymph nodes in the armpit area.

Why the need for a second shot?

Several of the COVID-19 vaccines, including the COVAXIN and Covishield being administered in India, need a second booster shot after some time. This is because the first shot creates neutralizing antibodies in the body that block the SARS-COV-2 virus from making one sick but this formation of protective antibodies can be short-lived. Thus, a second dose is needed in most cases to help the body generate a more robust and long-term response against illness by locking the memory of the virus.

The second shot helps the body form long-term memory-cells in addition to short-term protective antibodies. This is also why several people see much stronger side-effects after the second shot, because the body now has a stronger, faster and better-equipped immune response against the virus.

The fear of side effects might tempt many to forego the second shot, but it should be remembered that the potential effects of a COVID-19 infection could be much worse and even fatal.

Follow this link:
DNA Explainer: Received your COVID-19 vaccine? Know what's going on inside your body - DNA India

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on DNA Explainer: Received your COVID-19 vaccine? Know what’s going on inside your body – DNA India

Celsion Reports T-cell and B-cell Response from In Vivo Studies with its PLACCINE DNA Vaccine Platform – GlobeNewswire

Posted: at 2:18 pm

Results Indicate Induction of Adaptive Immune Response Against SARS-CoV-2

Company Plans Additional Development Work to Further Optimize its Vaccine Platform Through Vector Compositions, Delivery Route, Dosing and Dosing Frequency, and Use of Molecular Adjuvant

LAWRENCEVILLE, N.J., Sept. 02, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Celsion Corporation (NASDAQ: CLSN), a clinical-stage company focused on DNA-based immunotherapy and next-generation vaccines, today announced results from preclinical in vivo studies showing production of antibodies and cytotoxic T-cell response specific to the spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2 when immunizing BALB/c mice with the Companys next-generation PLACCINE DNA vaccine platform. Moreover, the antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen prevented the infection of cultured cells in a viral neutralization assay. The production of antibodies predicts the ability of PLACCINE to protect against SARS-CoV-2 exposure, and the elicitation of cytotoxic T-cell response shows the vaccines potential to eradicate cells infected with SARS-CoV-2.

These findings demonstrate the potential immunogenicity of Celsions PLACCINE DNA vaccine, which is intended to provide broad-spectrum protection and resistance against variants by incorporating multiple viral antigens, to improve vaccine stability at storage temperatures of 4o C and above, and to facilitate cheaper and easier manufacturing. Celsion expects to report these data at the International Vaccines Conference to be held on October 19 21, 2021.

In an effort to establish a suite of platform technologies, we have produced and characterized a family of DNA vaccine vectors expressing one or more SARS-CoV-2 surface antigens or proteins with or without immune modifiers or agents to improve vaccine quality, said Khursheed Anwer, PhD, Celsions Executive Vice President and Chief Science Officer. In addition, we are developing an intramuscular vaccine based on a specialized synthetic delivery system that yields high levels of viral proteins to generate the desired immune response. This formulation does not require a separate delivery device, such as electroporation, for administration. We are pleased with the immunogenicity data from our recent preclinical studies and plan to continue to share progress from ongoing in vivo studies intended to further optimize the PLACCINE DNA vaccine activity through vector design, delivery route, dose levels and dosing frequency, as well as adjuvant quality. If successful, our immediate goal is to validate our program with IND-enabling studies.

Michael H. Tardugno, Celsions Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, said, Our DNA-based vaccine is designed to improve the breadth of immune response by targeting multiple antigens of a pathogen or multiple mutants of the same antigen. The findings we are reporting today are encouraging and demonstrate that the immune response to the PLACCINE DNA vaccine is consistent with our vaccine design goals. We look forward to sharing our progress as we conduct further studies to optimize vector design, dosing and delivery with the goal of filing an Investigational New Drug application with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration early next year.

Importantly, based on our experience with GEN-1, our DNA plasmid immunotherapy, we fully expect that our platform will be both cost-effective and scalable, allowing for stability across a reasonable and readily achievable temperature range that addresses global vaccine storage and distribution needs. A successful proof of concept using mRNA vaccines as a standard will provide Celsion with the scientific basis to launch a vaccine program to address a range of unaddressed serious infectious diseases, Mr. Tardugno added.

About the PLACCINE platform

PLACCINE is Celsions proprietary plasmid and DNA delivery technology and the subject of a provisional patent application that covers a broad range of next-generation DNA vaccines. An adaptation of the Companys TheraPlas technology, PLACCINE is a DNA vaccine technology platform characterized by a single plasmid DNA with multiple coding regions. The plasmid vector is designed to express multiple pathogen antigens along with a potent immune modifier. It is delivered via a synthetic delivery system and has the potential to be easily modified to create vaccines against a multitude of infectious diseases, addressing:

About Celsion Corporation

Celsion is a fully integrated, clinical stage biotechnology company focused on advancing a portfolio of innovative cancer treatments, including immunotherapies and DNA-based therapies; and a platform for the development of nucleic acid vaccines currently focused on SARS-CoV2. The companys product pipeline includes GEN-1, a DNA-based immunotherapy for the localized treatment of ovarian cancer. ThermoDox, a proprietary heat-activated liposomal encapsulation of doxorubicin, is under investigator-sponsored development for several cancer indications. Celsion also has two platform technologies for the development of novel nucleic acid-based immunotherapies and other anti-cancer DNA or RNA therapies. Both are novel synthetic, non-viral vectors with demonstrated capability in nucleic acid cellular transfection. For more information on Celsion, visit http://www.celsion.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

Forward-looking statements in this news release are made pursuant to the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Readers are cautioned that such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, without limitation, statements relating to the offering and the use of proceeds therefrom, unforeseen changes in the course of research and development activities and in clinical trials; the uncertainties of and difficulties in analyzing interim clinical data, particularly in small subgroups that are not statistically significant; FDA and regulatory uncertainties and risks; the significant expense, time and risk of failure of conducting clinical trials; the need for Celsion to evaluate its future development plans; possible acquisitions or licenses of other technologies, assets or businesses; possible actions by customers, suppliers, competitors or regulatory authorities; and other risks detailed from time to time in the Celsion's periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Celsion assumes no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements that become untrue because of subsequent events, new information or otherwise.

CONTACTS:

Celsion CorporationJeffrey W. ChurchExecutive Vice President and CFO609-482-2455jchurch@celsion.com

LHA Investor RelationsKim Sutton Golodetz212-838-3777kgolodetz@lhai.com

Excerpt from:
Celsion Reports T-cell and B-cell Response from In Vivo Studies with its PLACCINE DNA Vaccine Platform - GlobeNewswire

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Celsion Reports T-cell and B-cell Response from In Vivo Studies with its PLACCINE DNA Vaccine Platform – GlobeNewswire

CRISPR just proved genes can self-heal in space for the first time ever – SYFY WIRE

Posted: at 2:18 pm

If in space, no one can hear you scream, then what happens when DNA silently breaks in microgravity? Spoiler alert: it heals itself.

This is what a CRISPR experiment that won the Genes in Space 6 contest SYFY WIRE was at the recent launchof the Genes in Space 8 experiment to the ISS found out. DNA damage or breakage can mean the potential for degenerative diseases such as cancer, but the fact that it can also self-repair (and in microgravity!) has enormous implications for medical treatments above and below Earths atmosphere.

Genes in Space picks the brains of teen scientists in grades 7 through 12 to come up with a DNA analysis experiment that can be carried out in the ISS U.S. National Lab, which has really become more like a molecular laboratory in space. Aarthi Vijayakumar, Michelle Sung, Rebecca Li, and David Li were the winners who wanted to know if broken DNA could heal in zero-G.

Along with NASA microbiologists Sarah Rommel and Sarah Wallace, the students recently published a study in PLOS ONE.

We have the capabilities to extract, amplify, purify, prepare sequencing libraries, and sequence nucleic acids onboard the ISS, Wallace told SYFY WIRE. While we have come a long way, there is still a lot that could advance the work further.

You cant just pack up an experiment and launch it to the ISS as is. Wallace and Rommel, in collaboration with biologist Emily Gleason of miniPCR and the Genes in Space Program, needed to create custom kits that took both the conditions in space and safety of the crew into account. Everything in those kits must undergo a tough toxicological assessment to make sure the astronauts are not being exposed to anything dangerous almost 250 miles from the ground. If something happens, astronauts cant just wash their hands or roll the window down.

The ISS, as Wallace sees it, is a semi-closed system. Anything that is brought in from outside could possibly be a hazard, which is why scientists much make sure that whatever is on a payload will not endanger astronauts or mess with life support systems. Procedures also need to be streamlined. There is not that much crew time to go around, since the crew have multiple experiments to manage and also take care of other tasks, such as going on spacewalks to resolve maintenance issues. Everything in a kit needs to be packaged for one convenient use.

The end result is a custom kit that has everything the astronauts need to perform the experiment we have planned, said Wallace. We use a lot of things from commercial kits, but we also use reagents we make in our labs, so it really is similar to what molecular labs on Earth are doing.

There is a huge advantage to going through with the entire experiment in space rather than just breaking the DNA on Earth and sending it up to the ISS to see whether it can be repaired. Not everything used in a lab on terra firma can transition to microgravity. At least CRISPR (which is really an acronym for Clustered Regularly Insterspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) does. It replicates an immune response in which bacteria copy DNA sequences to RNA, which sends a protein to cut the DNA. CRISPR can break DNA in a specific place without random damage.

"It has been hypothesized that DNA is more likely to be repaired by the error prone method in microgravity than it is on Earth, but there hasn't been a good way to study this before now." Gleason also told SYFY WIRE. "The students wanted to know ifDNA is repaired differently in microgravity andproposed using the CRISPR/Cas9 system to damage DNA so that we could study how it was repaired in space."

Astronauts created breaks in both strands of the double helix and waited to see what would happen. Our bodies do repair DNA on their own, but would these genes, taken from yeast, be salvageable in space? Replicating these processes in space was previously prevented by technical and safety risks that have now been worked out. After the DNA had repaired itself, it was sequenced to make sure that all its components had gone back to where they belonged. The methods used on the ISS arent limited to space, something Wallace is excited about.

I believe that there is massive potential for this type of portable method in the diagnostic space, she said. There are many potential applications of these methods and technology, ranging from environmental monitoring, pathogen identification, revealing antimicrobial resistance, and so much more.

Wallace and her team are currently working on a collaboration that will optimize an ISS method to see what kinds of microbes are crawling around in hospital rooms, since antibiotic resistance is an issue that (especially in this pandemic era) threatens healthcare. The miniPCR tech that is being used on the ISS has already been used in COVID-19 diagnostics, andGleason also looks forward to updates that will be made to the ISS lab and Genes in Space.

"There's so much that can be done with the tools and procedures already on the ISS," she said. "Genes in space has plans to add flurorescence visulaization and cell-free protein synthesis technology next year."

This goes to show that studies done in microgravity this can go from Earth to space and back again.

See more here:
CRISPR just proved genes can self-heal in space for the first time ever - SYFY WIRE

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on CRISPR just proved genes can self-heal in space for the first time ever – SYFY WIRE

Urine tumor DNA detection of minimal residual disease in muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with curative-intent radical cystectomy: A cohort…

Posted: at 2:18 pm

Background: The standard of care treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is radical cystectomy, which is typically preceded by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, the inability to assess minimal residual disease (MRD) noninvasively limits our ability to offer bladder-sparing treatment. Here, we sought to develop a liquid biopsy solution via urine tumor DNA (utDNA) analysis.

Methods and findings: We applied urine Cancer Personalized Profiling by Deep Sequencing (uCAPP-Seq), a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) method for detecting utDNA, to urine cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples acquired between April 2019 and November 2020 on the day of curative-intent radical cystectomy from 42 patients with localized bladder cancer. The average age of patients was 69 years (range: 50 to 86), of whom 76% (32/42) were male, 64% (27/42) were smokers, and 76% (32/42) had a confirmed diagnosis of MIBC. Among MIBC patients, 59% (19/32) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. utDNA variant calling was performed noninvasively without prior sequencing of tumor tissue. The overall utDNA level for each patient was represented by the non-silent mutation with the highest variant allele fraction after removing germline variants. Urine was similarly analyzed from 15 healthy adults. utDNA analysis revealed a median utDNA level of 0% in healthy adults and 2.4% in bladder cancer patients. When patients were classified as those who had residual disease detected in their surgical sample (n = 16) compared to those who achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR; n = 26), median utDNA levels were 4.3% vs. 0%, respectively (p = 0.002). Using an optimal utDNA threshold to define MRD detection, positive utDNA MRD detection was highly correlated with the absence of pCR (p < 0.001) with a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 81%. Leave-one-out cross-validation applied to the prediction of pathologic response based on utDNA MRD detection in our cohort yielded a highly significant accuracy of 81% (p = 0.007). Moreover, utDNA MRD-positive patients exhibited significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 7.4; 95% CI: 1.4-38.9; p = 0.02) compared to utDNA MRD-negative patients. Concordance between urine- and tumor-derived mutations, determined in 5 MIBC patients, was 85%. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) in utDNA MRD-positive patients was inferred from the number of non-silent mutations detected in urine cfDNA by applying a linear relationship derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) whole exome sequencing of 409 MIBC tumors. We suggest that about 58% of these patients with high inferred TMB might have been candidates for treatment with early immune checkpoint blockade. Study limitations included an analysis restricted only to single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), survival differences diminished by surgery, and a low number of DNA damage response (DRR) mutations detected after neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the MRD time point.

Conclusions: utDNA MRD detection prior to curative-intent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer correlated significantly with pathologic response, which may help select patients for bladder-sparing treatment. utDNA MRD detection also correlated significantly with PFS. Furthermore, utDNA can be used to noninvasively infer TMB, which could facilitate personalized immunotherapy for bladder cancer in the future.

See the original post here:
Urine tumor DNA detection of minimal residual disease in muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with curative-intent radical cystectomy: A cohort...

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Urine tumor DNA detection of minimal residual disease in muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with curative-intent radical cystectomy: A cohort…

Nearly 15,000 Nevadans register to vote in August – FOX5 Las Vegas

Posted: at 2:12 pm

'); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append(""+val.title+""); if (val.poly != "" && val.polyimg != "") { $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append('"+val.ihtml+""); $("#expandable-weather-block .weather-index-alerts").show(); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body h2").css({"font-family":"'Fira Sans', sans-serif", "font-weight":"500", "padding-bottom":"10px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body p").css({"font-size":"14px", "line-height":"24px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body span.wxalertnum").css({"float":"left", "width":"40px", "height":"40px", "color":"#ffffff", "line-height":"40px", "background-color":"#888888", "border-radius":"40px", "text-align":"center", "margin-right":"12px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body b").css("font-size", "18px"); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body li").css({"font-size":"14px", "line-height":"18px", "margin-bottom":"10px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body ul").css({"margin-bottom":"24px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body pre").css({"margin-bottom":"24px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body img").css({"width":"100%", "margin-bottom":"20px", "borderWidth":"1px", "border-style":"solid", "border-color":"#aaaaaa"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).css({"borderWidth":"0", "border-bottom-width":"1px", "border-style":"dashed", "border-color":"#aaaaaa", "padding-bottom":"10px", "margin-bottom":"40px"}); }); } function parseAlertJSON(json) { console.log(json); alertCount = 0; if (Object.keys(json.alerts).length > 0) { $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body ").empty(); } $.each(json.alerts, function(key, val) { alertCount++; $("#mrd-wx-alerts .alert_count").text(alertCount); $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body ").append(''); $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append(""+val.title+""); if (val.poly != "" && val.polyimg != "") { $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append(''); } else if (val.fips != "" && val.fipsimg != "") { // $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append(''); } $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append(val.dhtml+"

Instruction

Read the original post:
Nearly 15,000 Nevadans register to vote in August - FOX5 Las Vegas

Posted in Libertarianism | Comments Off on Nearly 15,000 Nevadans register to vote in August – FOX5 Las Vegas

JD Vance Surrenders to the Politics of Hate – Reason

Posted: at 2:12 pm

Hillbilly Elegy author JD Vance was already some way along a journey when he took the stage at the first "National Conservatism Conference" in July 2019.

In the runup to 2016, he had been an outspoken critic of Donald Trump's candidacy. "I find him reprehensible," he tweeted a month before the election. "Fellow Christians, everyone is watching us when we apologize for this man."

Within three years, his views had evolved sufficiently to put him on the program of an event widely viewed as an attempt by right-wing pundits and scholars to erect an institutional structureor at least some intellectual scaffoldingaround the Trump phenomenon.

Earlier this year, just after announcing a run for U.S. Senate, he apologized to Ohio voters for having been "wrong about the guy."

But only last week did the full force of Vance's spiritual reversal become apparent: "I think our people hate the right people," he told The American Conservative magazine.

"Our people" might be understood broadly as the Republican base, while those he sees as worthy of contempt might be understood broadly as leftists and members of the coastal elite. Reached for comment, his campaign press secretary affirmed that "JD Vance strongly believes that the political, financial and Big Tech elitesdeserve nothing but our scorn and hatred."

By suggesting that antipathy toward the correct out-group is itself a moral imperative, Vance was engaging a powerful political current that has recently resurfaced within the conservative movement. He is not the first to be swept up in it.

In 2016 and 2017, New York Post op-ed editor Sohrab Ahmari wrote a pair of long magazine articles sounding the alarm to people of faith about rising illiberalism at home and abroad. "Simply put," he said in the second piece for Commentary magazine, "in the real-world experience of the 20th century, the Church, tradition, and religious minorities fared far better under liberal-democratic regimes than they did under illiberal alternatives."

Two years later, Ahmari had had enough of all that. In a now-infamous broadside in the Christian journal First Things, he insisted that conservatives learn to see "politics as war and enmity," that they shed their "great horror" of "the use of the public power to advance the common good," and that they be willing "to fight the culture war with the aim of defeating the enemy and enjoying the spoils."

At the very core of the new illiberal conservatism is a yenfor powerand an unabashed willingness to use it to destroy one's political opponents. Summing up the problem with libertarians and "establishment" conservatives in an essay last year, Hillsdale College's David Azerrad assailed "the cowardice and accommodation in the face of leftist hegemony" exhibited by the "long list of enemies to the Right." The more "manly" and "combative" conservatism that Azerrad claimed to speak for "understands not just ideas," he said, "but power."

Demands of this sort can be plausibly justified only if one's adversaries are irredeemable and one's life itself is at stake. Listen to the new conservatives' online chatter and you'll hear just such claims: that the left wishes to "subjugate" or "exterminate" them; that progressives have no qualms about using state power to accomplish their ends; that to do anything less than respond "in kind" amounts to "unilateral disarmament"; that this is a "war" in which the only choices are "suicide" or victory at any cost.

And these sentiments are not limited to anonymous accounts on the dark edges of social media. In July, former Trump official (and "Flight 93 Election" essayist) Michael Anton lambasted conservatives for not responding appropriately to the "proto-genocidal rhetoric" of the left. In February 2020, Harvard Law professor Adrian Vermeule stepped into hot water by tweeting that the anti-Trump attendees of a center-right conference would be "the very first group for the camps." (He meant that their opposition to Trump will not be able to save them from the "gulags" when the "extremist left" takes over, he later clarified.) As talk radio provocateur Jesse Kelly put it this spring, "The Left and the Right have existed in a System where only the Left plays offense and the Right plays defense. They've existed in this System so long, both sides think it's normal. And permanent. It's not."

A couple of things should be clear at this point. For one, this is not a left-right schism. For those I call "Will-to-Power Conservatives," the fusionistright is no less an enemy than is the progressive-identitarian left. (Now would be a good moment to acknowledge that the politics of hate are not exactly foreign to segments of the progressive movement, either. Neither side has a monopoly on illiberalism.)

Second, this divide is not primarily about technocratic policy.

Consider that the same nationalist conference at which Vance spoke in 2019 featured a debate. On one side, representing the MAGA faction, former Mitt Romey adviser Oren Cass argued that Washington should use its powers of taxation and regulation to prop up American manufacturing against foreign competition. On the other, Richard Reinsch, an editor at the libertarian publisher Liberty Fund, made the case for free markets and against attempts by the state to choose winners and losers.

It can seem like this type of studious wrangling over the proper size and scope of government is the main rift on the right today. It's not. Cass' top-down industrial planning is about as far from my free trade libertarianism as a political agenda can be. But as a dispositional liberal, Cass recognizes, just as Reinsch and I do, that people can disagree without despising one another.

The same, I fear, cannot be said of Vance and his compatriots. And once hate becomes a virtue to be celebrated and opponents become enemies to be destroyed, before long, no response is off the table.

Students of intellectual history may be picking up a hair-raising resonance. The new illiberal conservatives have (sometimes quite explicitly) taken a page out of the book of Carl Schmitt, an anti-modernist, pro-authoritarian German political philosopher known for insisting that the core distinction of politics "is that between friend and enemy."

It's occasionally said that Schmitt's ideas were meant to be descriptive, not normative. Yet he plainly believed that blowing up constitutional limitations on the executive and withholding mercy from the out-group were the legitimate province of a sovereign state. Democracy, he once wrote, "necessarily involves first homogeneity and secondlyif necessarythe elimination or annihilation of heterogeneity."

As if to prove how strong the current of hate-based politics can be, Schmitt's beliefs would lead him to a stint as the "crown jurist of the Third Reich." Though he eventually left the Nazi Party, he refused to renounce the worldview that had made him one of Hitler's most prominent apologists.

With their talk of enemies and enmity and civilizational war, it seems the new illiberal conservatives have tapped into something that isn't so new after all.

Continued here:
JD Vance Surrenders to the Politics of Hate - Reason

Posted in Libertarianism | Comments Off on JD Vance Surrenders to the Politics of Hate – Reason

Voter ID: Why Doesn’t America Have a National ID Card? – The Atlantic

Posted: at 2:12 pm

Democrats in Congress are considering a policy that was long unthinkable: a federal requirement that every American show identification before casting a ballot. But as the party tries to pass voting-rights legislation before the next election, it is ignoring a companion proposal that could ensure that a voter-ID law leaves no one behindan idea that is as obvious as it is historically controversial. What if the government simply gave an ID card to every voting-age citizen in the country?

Voter-ID requirements are the norm in many countries, as Republicans are fond of pointing out. But so are national ID cards. In places such as France and Germany, citizens pick up their identity card when they turn 16 and present it once theyre eligible to vote. Out of nearly 200 countries across the world, at least 170 have some form of national ID or are implementing one, according to the political scientist Magdalena Krajewska.

In the American psyche, however, a national ID card conjures images of an all-knowing government, its agents stopping people on the street and demanding to see their papers. Or at least thats what leaders of both parties believe. The idea is presumed to be so toxic that not a single member of Congress is currently carrying its banner. Even those advocates who like the concept in theory will discuss its political prospects only with a knowing chuckle, the kind that signals that the questioner is a bit crazy. There are only three problems with a national ID: Republicans hate it, Libertarians hate it, and Democrats hate it, says Kathleen Unger, the founder of VoteRiders, an organization devoted to helping people obtain ID.

Admittedly, this is probably not the best time to propose a new national ID. A large minority of the country is rebelling against vaccine passports as a form of government coercion. Yet public opposition to a national ID has never been as strong as political leaders assume. The idea has won majority support in polls for much of the past 40 years and spiked to nearly 70 percent in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. In a nationwide survey conducted this summer by Leger for The Atlantic, 51 percent of respondents favored a national ID that could be used for voting, while 49 percent agreed with an opposing statement that a national ID would represent an unnecessary expansion of government power and would be misused to infringe on Americans privacy and personal freedoms. Support was far higher63 percentamong respondents who said they had voted for Joe Biden in 2020 than it was among those who said they had voted for Donald Trump (39 percent).

The best argument for a national ID is that the nations current hodgepodge of identifiers stuffs the wallets of some people but leaves millions of Americans empty-handed and disenfranchised. Studies over the years have found that as many as one in 10 citizens lacks the documentation needed to vote. Those who do are disproportionately Black, Hispanic, poor, or over the age of 65. The Atlantic poll suggests that the gap remains: 9 percent of respondents said they lacked a government-issued ID, although a much smaller share (2 percent) said that was the reason they did not vote in 2020. Because the overwhelming majority of Americans do have IDs, we dont realize theres this whole other side of the country thats facing this massive crisis, says Kat Calvin, who launched the nonprofit Spread the Vote, which helps people obtain IDs.

Read: How voter-ID laws discriminate

The United States gives every citizen a Social Security card with a unique nine-digit number, but the paper cards lack a photograph. Passports have photos, but barely more than one-third of Americans currently have one thats not expired. By far the most common form of photo ID is a state-issued drivers license, but many elderly and poor citizens dont drive, nor do a significant number of Americans who live in large cities and rely on mass transit.

Opposition to national ID remains among groups on the libertarian right, such as the Cato Institute, as well as civil-liberties advocates on the left, such as the ACLU. But even they acknowledge that the fears of an all-knowing government sound a bit ridiculous in an era when Americans freely hand over so much of themselves to companies such as Google, Facebook, and Apple. We do have a national ID, Michael Chertoff, a former secretary of homeland security under President George W. Bush, told me. Its operated by giant tech companies, where every place you are, everything you do, everything you search for is recorded in some fashion and integrated as a matter of managing your data. Were locking the window, and weve got the front door wide open.

The idea of linking voting to a single ID card was not always so far-fetched. In 2005, a bipartisan commission led by former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker endorsed a federal voter-ID requirement. The panel recommended that the emerging Real ID, a product of one of many security reforms Congress passed after September 11, be used for voting. The Real ID Act set minimum security standards for drivers licenses and other IDs that are used to board flights and enter federal buildings. It wasand is, as the federal government makes clear 16 years laterexplicitly not a national ID. Even in the security-at-any-cost posture of the years following 9/11, there was a general recognition that there was an allergy to a national ID, Chertoff told me.

Some of the Democrats on the commission believed that a national ID was inevitable. The United States is moving toward a national ID, for reasons of homeland security, Lee Hamilton, the former Indiana representative and a member of the commission, wrote to his colleagues in a memo obtained by The Atlantic. That moment was the closest the two parties have come to a consensus on voter ID in the past 20 years. But despite a push by Carter for a unanimous endorsement, three Democrats on the commissionincluding former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschledissented from its headline recommendation.

Democrats in Congress ensured that the idea went nowhere. The day after the commission released its recommendations, Barack Obama, then in his ninth month as a senator, stood alongside Representative John Lewis of Georgia to denounce the ID proposal as a mistake and a solution in search of a problem. The commission had called for voter ID even as it acknowledged within its report that the issue the requirement purports to solvevoter fraudwas extremely rare. Carter defended the proposal as a corrective to the restrictive ID laws that Republican-led states had already begun to pass. Other Democrats, though, now see a damaging legacy for the Carter-Baker commission: It coated the idea of voter-ID laws with a bipartisan gloss, allowing Republican-led states to justify unnecessary restrictions on the liberty of many Americans to cast a ballot, Spencer Overton, one of the panels Democratic dissenters, told me.

The goal of the Carter-Baker commissions recommendation was to endorse a federal ID standard for voting while requiring statesand perhaps, eventually, the federal governmentto make secure IDs available to every citizen free of charge. But thats not what happened. In 2001, just 11 states required ID to vote. The movement has exploded in the two decades since, aided by a Supreme Court ruling in 2008 upholding a voter-ID law in Indiana, the 2010 wave election that empowered Republicans across the country, and the 2013 Supreme Court decision that gutted the Voting Rights Act. Now 36 states have voter-ID laws on the books.

To understand why Democrats have so strenuously opposed voter-ID laws over the past two decades, consider the experience of Spread the Vote. With a staff of 16 and a budget of $1.6 million, the organization now operates in 17 states that require an ID to vote. Calvins staff and volunteers work with peoplemany of whom are homeless or were recently incarceratedto assemble and pay for the necessary documents. Securing just a single valid ID can take days or weeks. In its four years of existence, Spread the Vote has been able to get IDs for about 7,000 people. The organization estimates that the number of eligible voters in the U.S. who lack the IDs they need to cast a ballot is at least 21 million.

Read: How the government learned to waste your time

Generally, Democrats have long believed that negotiating with Republicans over ID laws was pointless because the GOPs insistence on them was less about protecting ballot integrity than about shaping the electorate to its advantage by suppressing the votes of people likely to back its opponents. Its hard not to see it as a part of a comprehensive strategy to engineer outcomes, Deval Patrick, the former Massachusetts governor (and, briefly, a 2020 presidential contender), told me.

The Democratic Party is taking a new look at a federal ID standard this year out of desperation. Democrats in the Senate need Joe Manchin of West Virginia to support their push for voting-rights legislation, and in June, he circulated a set of policies he wanted to see in a revised bill. One would require voter ID with allowable alternatives (utility bill, e.g.) to prove identity to vote. His single-line proposal makes no mention of requiring a photo. Many states, including Texas, already allow alternatives to presenting a photo ID, although the exceptions vary widely.

Read: The strange elegance of Joe Manchins voter-ID deal

The most surprising aspect of Manchins floated idea was the reaction of Democratic leaders. None of them shot it down. Stacey Abrams, who has fought restrictive voting laws nationwide since narrowly losing her 2018 bid to become Georgias governor, said she could absolutely support that provision. Representative James Clyburn of South Carolina, the Houses third-ranking Democrat and a close ally of President Joe Biden, was also okay with it. Ive never, ever said I was opposed to voters IDing themselves, Clyburn told me. A guy cant just walk off an airplane from a foreign country and walk into a voting booth and say, I want to vote. You have to ID yourself. Clyburn said an ID law just has to be equitable: The government cant, as some red states do, accept a hunting license as a form of ID for voting but not a student ID.

To Calvin, however, the initial acquiescence of Democrats such as Abrams and Clyburn to an ID proposal was a betrayal. My reaction was blinding rage followed by massive heartbreak and disappointment, she told me. A utility bill, she said, was a meaningless alternative for most of the people she tries to assist. My whole job is helping people who dont have utility bills get IDs, she said. What they were saying is: If you dont have a home or an apartment or if your name isnt on the lease on that home or apartment, you dont deserve to vote, you dont deserve to participate in democracy.

Calvin told me she would enthusiastically support a national voter-ID law on one condition: if it followed immediately after the creation of a national ID for everybody, with a plan and a budget to implement it. She suffers no illusions about the likelihood of that happening, however. Its a pipe dream, she said. Calvins right. Democrats may be open to requiring voter ID, but the prospect of a national ID is still too hot to touch.

After Clyburn spent several minutes explaining the kind of ID law he could support, I asked him whether the solution was simply to create an ID for everyone. The lawmaker responsible for counting votes in the House stopped me immediately. Im not into that, he said. I pressed him, bringing up the Carter-Baker commission, the use of national ID in other countries. I know where youre going with this, Clyburn replied. Im not there.

Read the original:
Voter ID: Why Doesn't America Have a National ID Card? - The Atlantic

Posted in Libertarianism | Comments Off on Voter ID: Why Doesn’t America Have a National ID Card? – The Atlantic

Everything you need to know about Wario – Polygon

Posted: at 2:12 pm

Its often said that Wario is an enigma. Who says that? Thats not one of the questions were here to answer.

Its Wario Month here at Wariogon, and there are some burning questions out there about Wario. While hes certainly the loudest and proudest of the overall-wearing citizens of the Mushroom Kingdom, there are some common misconceptions about him.

Lets dive into the things you need to know ahead of our month celebrating the gold and garlic-loving prince of video games (and farts).

Warios first appearance was Super Mario Land 2: 6 Golden Coins on the Game Boy. He served as the games primary antagonist, and he was reportedly born out of one Nintendo teams frustration over making a game based on a different teams protagonist.

Thus Wario, envisioned by creator Hiroji Kiyotake as the Bluto to Mario's Popeye, was born. Wario went on to take over the Land series, dubbing it Wario Land. Most notably, Wario joined the ever-growing roster of Mushroom Kingdom denizens to golf, kart, and party with Mario and his friends. He eventually opened WarioWare to make his own video games, and he even starred in his own 3D platform on the Nintendo GameCube, Wario World, but we dont talk about that.

Growing up, I remember hearing playground rumors about Wario. (Clearly, I had a lot going on during second grade.) The most popular one was that Wario and Mario were cousins. But thats not the case. Wario and Mario were actually just childhood rivals, and the two share no blood relation.

So, Mario and Wario arent cousins, but surely Waluigi is Warios brother? No, thank god.

Wario was the original Wa inhabitant of the Mushroom Kingdom, showing up as a villain for Mario in 1992. Waluigi, on the other hand, is an absolute creep who only exists so Wario could have a duos partner in tennis. None of that is a joke.

An issue of Nintendo Power cataloged last year on Twitter revealed that Waluigi is just some goober that Wario hired. Waluigi isnt even his real name. Wario apparently searched an internet actor pool and hired Jimmy Poppadopolos to act like his duo partner and be a foil for Luigi. Waluigi has since legally changed his name. Seriously.

This question has a pretty complex answer. Wario isnt the main villain of the series, to be sure. But even Bowser, who trumps Wario in sheer villainy, is more of an antagonist than a villain. Bowser is a good dad who even occasionally acts in a more comedic role for story-based Mario titles like the Mario & Luigi games or Paper Mario. In many cases, Bowser is more of a frenemy than an antagonist. And with how much Bowser, Wario, Mario, and the rest of the gang hang out while playing sports and driving, Im not sure you could even call Bowser a bad guy.

With Wario clearly in a lower bad guy tier than Bowser, I think its safe to downgrade him from villain to jerk.

Youd think so, but Id guess no.

Youll find surprisingly little if you type Wario and IBS (irritable bowel syndrome) into Google, so Ill just say this from the heart: Warios farts are weaponized and on demand. It is, in fact, crueler if he doesnt have IBS and has instead just cultivated his body to be an unnatural fart machine. A weapon of gas destruction, if you will.

Another question thats surprisingly complex to answer.

Wario is Italian now, but he wasnt always. Warios original voice actor was German translator Thomas Spindler, and his line that sounds like oh, I missed! is actually So ein Mist! which is German for oh crap! On brand for Wario. Spindler said Wario was always envisioned as German.

However, outside of his Mario Strikers Charged theme song which has a German folk song vibe Wario is largely viewed as Italian. The shift seems to have happened as soon as Charles Martinet, Marios voice actor, took over the role. The Wario we hear today speaks more than any of Martinets other characters and in an even thicker Italian accent than Mario.

Maybe?

In a Nintendo Power issue from 2000, the magazine asked producer Hiroyuki Takahashi if Wario had his own partner the way Mario and Luigi have Peach and Daisy. Marios creator, Shigeru Miyamoto told the producer that he didnt want to see whatever girlfriends Wario and Waluigi would find for themselves.

However, the same Nintendo Power blog that outs Waluigi as Jimmy Poppadopolos also suggests that Wario and Waluigi may have had a budding romance. The article does say that as of Mario Kart Double Dash the two have parted ways physically, which is perhaps the worst imaginable way to put that.

So, if Wario does fuck, he probably fucks Waluigi. Do with that information what you will.

If you google Wario, as I often do, youve probably run into this auto-complete, asking if Wario considers himself a member of the Libertarian political party.

This is actually not a sincere question, but instead an old school Twitter meme from 2011.

But in service of this FAQ: No, Wario is not a Libertarian. Wario clearly doesnt believe in or understand government, otherwise he would have run for office at this point.

Read the rest here:
Everything you need to know about Wario - Polygon

Posted in Libertarianism | Comments Off on Everything you need to know about Wario – Polygon

Page 800«..1020..799800801802..810820..»