Page 687«..1020..686687688689..700710..»

Category Archives: Transhuman News

Anatomy texts should show sex as a spectrum to include intersex people – The Conversation AU

Posted: October 26, 2021 at 5:29 pm

Scientists are learning more and more about human biological variation, including of sex characteristics. But images of the human body in anatomy remain mostly muscular, white, and male with limited diversity, including of sex.

Intersex people represent just under 2% of the population a comparable percentage to people born with red hair. Yet anatomy textbooks used in Australian medical schools almost completely stick to the male-female sex binary. In our earlier research we found intersex was included in only five of 6,004 images across 17 texts. This marginalises intersex people, who have been persistently discriminated against within the health-care system.

The intersex community is the often forgotten I in LGBTQI+. Intersex Human Rights Australia highlights the need for increased visibility and to prevent unnecessary surgeries. Now there are fresh calls for health and medical students to learn about sex characteristics as a continuum rather than as male or female.

Read more: Marriage equality was momentous, but there is still much to do to progress LGBTI+ rights in Australia

Sex development in utero is complex, involving at least 70 different genes.

Our sex is defined by our genes (Y or X chromosome), gonads (ovaries or testes), reproductive tract, and external genitalia.

Whether a foetus develops female, intersex or male characteristics is determined by four key elements. These are the Y chromosome and its sex-determining gene (SRY gene), and two hormones (anti-Mullerian hormone and testosterone).

A foetus with all four elements will develop male sex characteristics.

At 67 weeks gestation, the SRY gene on the Y chromosome signals the gonads to develop into testes. About 23 weeks later, secretion of two hormones by the testes directs further sex development. Anti-Mullerian hormone stops female sex characteristic development. Testosterone stimulates development of the male reproductive tract and external genitalia.

When all four elements are absent, female sex characteristics develop.

Without a Y chromosome and its SRY gene, the gonads develop into ovaries. Without anti-Mullerian hormone or testosterone production, the female reproductive tract and external genitalia develop.

The presence of some but not all of these elements results in the development of intersex characteristics.

Intersex can include both or a combination of male and female sex characteristics, depending on variations in chromosomes, genes or hormones. This represents the continuum of the sex spectrum between the male and female binaries.

Known variations in the Y and X chromosomes include XY (genetic male), XXY (Klinefelter syndrome), X (Turner syndrome), XX (genetic female). Variations in the gonads include the presence of both ovaries and testes, or only partial development of either. Other intersex variations include a combination of male and female genitalia, and external genitalia that differs in sex to the genetic sex.

Intersex traits are not always visible at birth. Individuals may not realise they are intersex until puberty, or only if they undergo assessment for infertility or genetic testing.

There is a tragic history of irreversible surgical interventions in intersex infants and children. This was often without their consent, or with parents coerced to consent.

These surgeries have been to normalise external genitalia to a male or female binary. The impact of these procedures may violate human rights. They can be devastating for intersex peoples lifelong physical and mental well-being.

The UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights description of intersex is having sex characteristics that do not fit typical binary notions of male or female bodies. But even this pathologises intersex by indicating that intersex people do not fit.

Normalisation of sex variation and increased visual representation of intersex in anatomy is necessary to reduce stigma.

The minimal visual representation of intersex people in anatomy textbooks can affect students attitudes towards this. We have previously found viewing gender-biased images of anatomy is associated with higher implicit gender bias. Todays students are our next generation of doctors and health-care workers.

Read more: What are gender pronouns and why is it important to use the right ones?

Teaching sex characteristics based on a male-female binary is inaccurate and outdated. Weve also shown it negatively influences the healthcare of intersex individuals.

Both the University of Wollongong and the University of New South Wales are developing inclusive anatomy curricula within their medicine and health degrees. Harvard Medical School and University of British Columbia are also developing online, accessible resources to promote inclusive anatomical representation in medical education.

Inclusive teaching and knowledge of sex variation can be transformative beyond anatomy.

Teaching sex characteristics as a continuum will increase the visibility and understanding of intersex. Removing the stigma associated with sex (and other) variations in anatomy, and medical and health education is essential for optimal health, well-being, belonging and connection for everyone.

Read this article:
Anatomy texts should show sex as a spectrum to include intersex people - The Conversation AU

Posted in Gene Medicine | Comments Off on Anatomy texts should show sex as a spectrum to include intersex people – The Conversation AU

The science of probiotics, prebiotics and postbiotics – Natural Products INSIDER

Posted: at 5:22 pm

The human microbiome refers to the organisms (bacteria, fungi and viruses) that reside in and on a persons body. For the purposes of this article, the use of the term microbiome will be limited to those bacteria.

The Human Genome Project, which cost an estimated US$3 billion, was a 13-year (1990-2003) project that resulted in the first successful sequencing of the human genome. Scientists had hoped that sequencing the human genome would lead to cures for many of todays chronic degenerative diseases. That goal failed, and sequencing the human genome never led to successful treatments for any diseases.

However, one great benefit that emerged from the project was the development of incredible technology which allows scientists to sequence genomes at a fast, affordable pace. For example, in January 2017, Illumina, a global producer of next-generation sequencing technology, announced its new NovaSeq could sequence a genome in one day for only $100.

The incredible power and speed of the new gene sequencing technology were partly responsible for the governments funding of the Human Microbiome Project (2007-2012). That endeavor resulted in the publication of over 350 studies, which are viewed as the birth of the modern era of microbiome science.

There was a tremendous amount of knowledge gained from the Microbiome Project and subsequent research on the human microbiome, explained Nena Dockery, scientific and regulatory manager at Stratum Nutrition. Families of microbes (mostly bacteria) were identified, and their relative numbers began to be associated with various health benefits and disease susceptibility. Some of the bacterial species that were shown to be particularly beneficial were isolated from human or food sources and commercially grown as a supplemental source of these beneficial speciesand the probiotics industry took off. Along the way, it was discovered how important specific strains of bacteria were, which narrowed commercialization down to bacterial strains that could be patented for their benefits.

She continued, Prebiotics then began to become recognized as food sources both for the supplemented probiotics and to encourage growth of the bodys own beneficial species. If combined in a product with specific bacteria shown to thrive with certain prebiotics, the term synbiotic was used.

Dockery took particular interest in the developing science. As part of the research on the bodys native bacteria, it was found that certain bacteria produce byproducts of their metabolism that have substantial benefits to their human host, she stated. For example, some produce digestive enzymes, like lactase. Lactase breaks down milk sugar (lactose) and its absence in the body leads to lactose intolerance. Other bacteriaespecially those in the colonproduce short-chain fatty acids [SCFAs], such as butyrate, that are very protective against the development of colon cancer. Of course, this type of research was a big Ah ha moment for scientists because the microbes (again, mostly bacteria) could produce these byproducts in the broth used to ferment them for commercial production into probiotics; and that resulted in a further study that led to the introduction of postbiotics.

Most probiotics currently on the market are designed to work in the gut. The intestinal tract, particularly the lower intestine, is the home to trillions of microorganisms that provide a variety of benefits, mostly related to digestion and immune functioning. However, medications, especially antibiotics, along with certain disease conditions, diet, genetics and lifestyle choices, all play a role in the composition of an individuals microbiome. Probiotics are designed to support healthy functioning of the bodys own microbiome and fill in the gaps where deficiencies have developed.

It is now known that the immune benefits of the bodys protective microbiome dont begin in the gut, but in the oral cavity, where pathogenic microbes most often enter the body.1 The oral cavity is home to as many different species of bacteria as the gut; and these bacteria can form an extremely strong barrier against invaders, influencing the health, not only of the teeth and gums, but extending into the throat and ear canals, and indirectly, throughout the entire body.

Dockery suggested, To a certain extent, these good bacteria function through competitive inhibition, but more importantly, some strains of bacteria like the beneficial oral cavity species, Streptococcus salivarius, can produce compounds called bacteriocin-like-inhibitory-substances (BLIS). These compounds are highly inhibitory to specific pathogenic bacteria. Probiotics derived from indigenous strains of these beneficial bacteria may help provide a front-line protection against unfavorable strains entering the body through the mouth and nose. Some of these strains, such as S. salivarius K12 have been extensively researched for safety and their ability to colonize in the human oral cavity.2-8

Another indigenous strain of S. salivarius is M18, which has several unique characteristics that make it a beneficial component of the oral microbiome. S. salivarius M18 produces BLIS compounds that inhibit several species of common bacterial species that contribute to tooth decay and gingivitis. It also secretes two enzymes that make the oral cavity less favorable to deleterious species. Urease is an enzyme produced by M18 that helps raise the pH of the oral cavity environment, making it less conducive to acidogenic bacterial strains that weaken tooth enamel. M18 also produces a dextranase that helps break down dextran, a carbohydrate that is an integral component of dental plaque. BLIS M18 is a probiotic sourced from S. salivarius M18 that has been shown in several studies to help promote healthy teeth and gums.9-12

Present in fiber-rich foods such as fruits, vegetables and whole grains, prebiotics are a type of fiber the human body cannot digest. Dockery noted the benefits of dietary fiber are well-known, impacting such diverse areas as cardiovascular health, digestive health and weight.13 Most dietary fiber sources are complex polysaccharides. However, this has expanded to include oligosaccharides, which are composed of fewer monosaccharides (simple sugars). Oligosaccharides now make up most commercially marketed prebiotic fiber.

Prebiotics persist intact through the digestive tract to the colon where they are fermented by bacteria and other microorganisms. Consumption of prebiotic foods or supplements can help ensure an optimal food source for colonic bacteria and production of the beneficial compounds (such as the SCFAs) resulting from the fermentation process.

Though prebiotics can fairly easily be obtained through the ingestion of certain foods (such as oats that contain beta-glucan, and apples, which contain pectin), many of the best sources for prebiotic fiber are foods such as konjac root and seaweed, which are not regular parts of the Western diet. As such, prebiotic supplements are gaining in popularity.

Currently, there is no consistency in what is sold as a postbiotic, Dockery maintained.Some companies market products identified as postbiotics that are a blend of the beneficial byproducts of microbial metabolism found in the supernatant or even single byproducts such as butyrate. However, the International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) recently set the definition as 'A preparation of inanimate microorganisms and/or their components that confers a health benefit on the host.' This definition includes the presence of killed microbial cells and cell fragments (usually from heat treatment) but notably omits the requirement of the supernatant, though it could be included in a postbiotic product.

She acknowledged postbiotics appear to be the latest trend in the -biotics industry and do have some distinct manufacturing and marketing advantages over probiotics. Most notably: since they are not live microbes, shelf stability and survival through the gut can be much more predictable.

Alexis Collins, product manager at Stratum Nutrition, said, It is a relief to have an esteemed scientific body such as ISAPP provide us with a comprehensive definition of postbiotics. This will not only provide much-needed clarity for our customers, but will also be the kickoff for postbiotic education for the end consumer.

Stratum offers LBiome, a human strain-derived,heat-treatedpostbiotic (LactobacillusLB), the latter of which has been researched in postbiotic form for over a century, with 12 published clinical studies showing digestive health support for both adult and pediatric populations.14-21Collins noted LBiome provides the digestive benefits of a probiotic and the formulation flexibility of a spore, with none of the stability or manufacturing concerns.

LBiome cells adhere to the gut lining, forming an enhanced environment for the gut microbiome, all while simultaneously strengthening the gut lining by supporting a healthy brush border and tight junctions.22 In addition, recent published research has shown the ingredient to be bifidogenic, increasing populations of several species of beneficial Bifidobacterium in both an in vitro cell culture and in an ex vivo human fecal fermentation system.

According to the MarketsandMarkets report,"Human Microbiome Marketby Product (Prebiotics, Probiotics, Food, Diagnostic Tests, Drugs), Application (Therapeutic, Diagnostic), Disease (Infectious, Metabolic/Endocrine), Research Technology (Genomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics) - Global Forecast to 2028," the global human microbiome marketis projected to reachUS$1.6 millionby 2028. This is up from$894 millionin 2025, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 21.3% through the time period.

Dockery concluded, Few other segments within the dietary supplement and functional foods industries have expanded and diversified to the extent that the -biotics segment has. This has presented tremendous opportunities for continued growth, and at the same time has resulted in the expected challenges such as where and when NDINs [new dietary ingredient notifications] might be required, to the splitting of the Lactobacillus genus. At the same time, this expansion provides exciting opportunities for the introduction of new ingredients that will safely and effectively provide tremendous benefits that can potentially be customized to meet specific needs in the end consumer.

The research on prebiotics, probiotics and postbiotics continues to expand as more information is uncovered about the positive role the human microbiome plays in supporting and maintaining human health.

Jacqueline Rizo is a content writer who specializes in B2B articles and white papers for the natural products industry on behalf ofStratum Nutrition.

References

1 Burton JP et al. Beneficial microbes for the oral cavity: time to harness the oral streptococci? Benef Microbes. 2011;2(2):93-101.

2 Di Pierro F et al. Preliminary pediatric clinical evaluation of the oral probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 in preventing recurrent pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis caused by Streptococcus pyogenes and recurrent acute otitis media.Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:991-997.

3 Di Pierro F et al. Clinical evaluation of the oral probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 in the prevention of recurrent pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis caused by Streptococcus pyogenes in adults. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013;13(3):339-343.

4 Di Pierro F et al. Use of Streptococcus salivarius K12 in the prevention of streptococcal and viral pharyngotonsillitis in children. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2014;6:15-20.

5 Di Pierro F et al. Oral use of Streptococcus salivarius K12 in children with secretory otitis media: preliminary results of a pilot, uncontrolled study. Int J Gen Med. 2015;8:303-308.

6 Di Pierro F et al. Effect of administration of Streptococcus salivarius K12 on the occurrence of streptococcal pharyngo-tonsillitis, scarlet fever and acute otitis media in 3 years old children. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20(21):4601-4606.

8 Marini G et al. Pilot study to explore the prophylactic efficacy of oral probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 in preventing recurrent pharyngo-tonsillar episodes in pediatric patients. Int J Gen Med. 2019;12:213-217.

9 Di Pierro F et al. Cariogram outcome after 90 days of oral treatment with Streptococcus salivarius M18 in children at high risk for dental caries: results of a randomized, controlled study.Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015;7:107-113.

10 Bardellini E et al. Does Streptococcus Salivarius Strain M18 Assumption Make Black Stains Disappear in Children? Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020;18(1):161-164.

11 Scariya L et al. Probiotics in Periodontal Therapy. Int J Pharma Bio Sci. 2015;6(1):242-250.

12 Burton JP et al. Influence of the probiotic Streptococcus salivarius strain M18 on indices of dental health in children: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62(Pt 6):875-884.

13 Slavin J. Fiber and prebiotics: mechanisms and health benefits. Nutrients. 2013;5(4):1417-1435.

14 Boehm G et al. Prebiotics and immune responses. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004;39:pS376.

15 Simakachorn N et al. Clinical evaluation of the addition of lyophilized, heat-killed Lactobacillus acidophilus LB to oral rehydration therapy in the treatment of acute diarrhea in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;30:68-72.

16 Salazar-Lindo E et al. Effectiveness and safety of Lactobacillus LB in the treatment of mild acute diarrhea in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;44(5):571-576.

17 Lievin-Le Moal V et al. An experimental study and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the antisecretory activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB against nonrotavirus diarrhea. Pediatrics. 2007;120(4):795-803.

18 Bodilis JY. Controlled clinical trial of Lacteol Fort compared with a placebo and reference drug in the treatment of acute diarrhea in the adult. Medecine Actuelle. 1983;10:232-235.

19 Xiao SDet al.Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of heat-killed Lactobacillus acidophilusLB in patients with chronic diarrhea.Adv Therapy. 2003;20:253-260.

20 Kor JY et al. Lacteol Fort Treatment Reduces Antibiotic Associated Diarrhea. Singapore Fam Physician. 2010;36(4):46-49.

21 Canducci F et al. A lyophilized and inactivated culture of Lactobacillus acidophilus increases Helicobacter pylori eradication rates. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14(12):1625-1629.

22 Warda A et al. A postbiotic consisting of heat-treated Lactobacilli has a bifidogenic effect in pure culture and in human fermented fecal communities. App Environ Microbiol. 2021;87(8):e02459-20.

View original post here:
The science of probiotics, prebiotics and postbiotics - Natural Products INSIDER

Posted in Human Genetics | Comments Off on The science of probiotics, prebiotics and postbiotics – Natural Products INSIDER

Fortune and Great Place to Work Name Amgen One o… | INN – Investing News Network

Posted: at 5:22 pm

Amgen (NASDAQ: AMGN) today announced that it has been selected as one of the Worlds Best Workplaces for 2021 by Fortune magazine and Great Place to Work . Amgen ranked eighth among the 25 companies named to the list. Those on the list were selected from 10,000 companies, representing the voices of nearly 20 million employees in more than 100 countries.

We are very proud of this honor, said Robert A. Bradway , Amgens chairman and chief executive officer. To be recognized on a global scale demonstrates our ongoing commitment to providing staff with an environment in which they are able to grow and thrive even during challenging times.

The Worlds Best Workplaces are the most sweeping and consistent examples of inclusive company cultures weve ever known, said Michael C. Bush , chief executive officer of Great Place to Work. In a global workforce, alignment is everything, and these companies are fortifying their culture around the world a nearly impossible feat. Even when tested by the pandemic, these companies recognize sub-communities in each region and their leaders carry an equitable employee experience across cultures.

Earlier this year, Amgen was ranked by Great Place to Work as the seventh best workplace in Europe . Additionally, 25 Amgen affiliates around the world have either been certified or recognized by Great Place to Work nationally. The Fortune Worlds Best Workplaces list is available at https://www.greatplacetowork.com/best-workplaces-international/world-s-best-workplaces/2021 .

About Amgen Amgen is committed to unlocking the potential of biology for patients suffering from serious illnesses by discovering, developing, manufacturing and delivering innovative human therapeutics. This approach begins by using tools like advanced human genetics to unravel the complexities of disease and understand the fundamentals of human biology.

Amgen focuses on areas of high unmet medical need and leverages its expertise to strive for solutions that improve health outcomes and dramatically improve peoples lives. A biotechnology pioneer since 1980, Amgen has grown to beone ofthe worldsleadingindependent biotechnology companies, has reached millions of patients around the world and is developing a pipeline of medicines with breakaway potential.

For more information, visit http://www.amgen.com and follow us on http://www.twitter.com/amgen .

CONTACT: Amgen, Thousand Oaks Megan Fox , 805-447-1423 (media) Trish Rowland , 805-447-5631(media) Arvind Sood , 805-447-1060 (investors)

View original content to download multimedia: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fortune-and-great-place-to-work-name-amgen-one-of-the-worlds-best-workplaces-in-2021-301409048.html

SOURCE Amgen

Originally posted here:
Fortune and Great Place to Work Name Amgen One o... | INN - Investing News Network

Posted in Human Genetics | Comments Off on Fortune and Great Place to Work Name Amgen One o… | INN – Investing News Network

National Institutes of Health awards $1.65 million to University of Dayton researchers to study genetic basis of childhood diseases and birth defects…

Posted: at 5:22 pm

By Dave Larsen

The National Institutes of Health awarded two University of Dayton geneticists a five-year, $1.65 million grant to study how genes regulate three-dimensional patterning and growth during early eye development to understand the genetic basis of childhood retinal diseases and birth defects in the human eye.

Department of Biology professors Amit Singh and Madhuri Kango-Singh are co-principal investigators on the grant, which started Aug. 1 and continues through June 2026. They will use the fruit fly eye model to study the genetic machinery involved in regulating how an eye is formed at the cellular level.

Singhs previous eye development research, funded under a $485,000 National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant awarded in 2017, focused on how genes regulate the process of transforming a single layer of cells into a three-dimensional organ.

That research will expand under the new grant with the addition of Kango-Singh, whose research focus is cancer biology, as co-principal investigator. She will focus on a genetic signaling pathway that regulates growth during eye development.

Not only do you need to make the structure, but it needs to grow to the right size and in the right way, so that you make what would be normal eyes on the heads of flies, said Kango-Singh, who was a co-investigator on the 2017 grant. The same genes function in the development of eyes in other animals and humans, so it could also be interesting to learn about how that process pans out and whether it is involved in birth defects.

Scientists use fruit flies to model human diseases at the cellular and molecular levels because they have similar genetic traits to those of humans. The flys entire life cycle is just 12 days, which allows researchers to study the transmission of hereditary traits and investigate the genetics of disease across at least 24 generations in a year.

Kango-Singh will spearhead the effort to understand how growth pathways regulate this basic process of forming an eye, while Singh will remain focused on the core genetic machinery of eye development.

Their goal is to gain better insights into eye formation, including birth defects associated with a particular transcription factor a protein involved in the controlling expression of other genes.

What we have proposed here is that this transcription factor is required for the placement of the eye on the head of an organism, Singh said. In laymans language, eyes are not the same for all organisms on the head they are placed far apart or close together. We have hypothesized that this transcription factor might be involved in that. It also regulates growth. So, thats the reason we have brought growth and patterning together, and this can be a new component in the eye development machinery.

Despite their separate research interests, the couple has collaborated on a number of projects and publications for more than 27 years. In May 2020, they published the second edition of their well-received book about the fruit fly, Molecular Genetics of Axial Patterning, Growth and Disease in Drosophila Eye.

Under the new NIH grant, Singh and Kango-Singh will each hire a postdoctoral researcher and two graduate assistants to work in their respective labs. In addition, Singh recruited six new undergraduate students for the project. Kango-Singh has six undergraduates working in her lab and hopes to hire three or four more to work on the project.

One of the pillars of UDs vision is experiential learning for undergraduate students, Singh said. We actively involve these students in our research. They are primary authors on peer-reviewed publications. They present at local, regional and international meetings.

He said exposing undergraduate students to cutting-edge research and instrumentation such as the Olympus confocal laser scanning microscope and Zeiss Apotome fluorescence microscope produces well-rounded scientists who are well-prepared for the job market or graduate school.

Kango-Singh, director of the Universitys biology graduate program, credits their NIH grant to the participation of graduate students in their research.

Having a vibrant graduate program at UD in biology is crucial for the success of all faculty with grants, she said. It is the lifeline for success with funding and publications the two things crucial for growing the reputation of the graduate program and the University.

Singh said 70% of their success with the NIH grant is due to the hard work of graduate students. These people are really working 24/7 to make these things happen, he said.

For more information, visit the Department of Biology website.

Continued here:
National Institutes of Health awards $1.65 million to University of Dayton researchers to study genetic basis of childhood diseases and birth defects...

Posted in Human Genetics | Comments Off on National Institutes of Health awards $1.65 million to University of Dayton researchers to study genetic basis of childhood diseases and birth defects…

23andMe Honored in Fast Company’s First Annual List of Brands That Matter – Marketscreener.com

Posted: at 5:22 pm

This week 23andMe made Fast Company's first annual list of "Brands that Matter," an award honoring companies and nonprofits with a mission or ideals that have had a cultural impact and are relevant and authentic.

This new award singles out 95 organizations that, like 23andMe, have inspired people and given them compelling reasons to care about innovation, or social issues, cultural issues, the environment, or their fellow humans. Among those on the list are not just massive multinational conglomerates, but also small companies and nonprofits. All of them have forged an emotional or meaningful connection with people. All were judged on their relevancy, cultural impact, ingenuity, and business innovation.

"Fast Companyis excited to highlight companies and organizations that have built brands with deep meaning and connections to the customers they serve," said Stephanie Mehta, editor-in-chief of Fast Company. "At a time when consumers are holding companies to very high standards, businesses have much to learn from these brands that have garnered respect and trust."

Lead with Science

It's that trust that is probably most important to 23andMe's brand, said Tracy Keim, Vice President of Consumer Marketing and Brand at 23andMe.

"It started with Anne Wojcicki, (23andMe's CEO and Co-Founder)," Tracy said. "She co-founded 23andMe to help people - to be a brand that made a difference in people's lives - we were a brand born out of purpose, not profit."

23andMe is also a brand driven by science. And Fast Company pointed to two of our more recent very large scientific initiatives in singling out 23andMe for this award.

The first was a study using genetics to look at the human impact of the transatlantic slave trade, as part of the largest study to date of people with African ancestry in the Americas. The second is an ongoing study on the genetics associated with differences among people in susceptibility to and severity from COVID-19that involved more than a million research participants. Several findings from that study have already been published or shared, and our researchers are currently investigating the genetics of COVID-19 "long-haulers."

"It's exciting to see this list of brands making a difference," said Tracy. "We're all interested in solutions through action, not just advertising. One of 23andMe's core values is to 'lead with science.' DNA data can tell us so much about problems we confront today and in the future - whether it's studying COVID-19 or our fraught racial history, or important health issues - our team of researchers have big hearts and open minds and go where the science leads them."

Mission Driven

It's been almost two decades since the mapping of the human genome, the most significant scientific breakthrough of our generation. 23andMe works to bring the power of genetic science to everyone. As a brand, 23andMe has always been mission-driven, focused on helping people access, understand, and benefit from the human genome. We created an industry offering people direct access to their genetic information, as well as an opportunity to participate in research if they choose. We share our research findings and ensure that those who participate in research know we've done it through solid science and innovation, but also with whimsy and a human touch.

You can find a complete list of winnershere.

23andMe will be featured along with the other honorees in theNovember issue of Fast Companymagazine, which is available onlinenowand will be on newsstands beginning November 2, 2021.

See the original post here:
23andMe Honored in Fast Company's First Annual List of Brands That Matter - Marketscreener.com

Posted in Human Genetics | Comments Off on 23andMe Honored in Fast Company’s First Annual List of Brands That Matter – Marketscreener.com

Gain Therapeutics, Inc. Announces Appointment of Five Members to its Newly Formed Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) – Yahoo Finance

Posted: at 5:22 pm

Dr. Luca Benatti to Chair SAB

BETHESDA, Md., Oct. 26, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Gain Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: GANX) (Gain, or the company), a biotechnology company focused on identifying and optimizing allosteric binding sites never before targeted in neurodegenerative diseases and lysosomal storage disorders, today announced the formation of its Scientific Advisory Board (SAB). Luca Benatti, Ph.D. will serve as chair of the SAB. Additional appointments include Samuel Broder, M.D.; Lorenzo Leoni, Ph.D.; Joanne Taylor, Ph.D.; and Michel Vellard, Ph.D.

I am honored to welcome Dr. Benatti, Dr. Broder, Dr. Leoni, Dr. Taylor and Dr. Vellard to our advisory board and want to express my gratitude for their scientific contributions as we continue to expand our pipeline and progress Gain Therapeutics lead program in Parkinsons Disease toward clinical studies, said Eric Richman, Chief Executive Officer of Gain. These individuals are luminaries in their respective fields and will perform significant roles in shaping our future clinical programs. And I would like to especially thank Dr. Benatti for his commitment to serve as chair of our SAB.

Luca Benatti, Ph.D., Chair of the Scientific Advisory BoardDr. Benatti will lead Gains SAB and work closely with the companys leadership team to shape the scientific strategy and advance Gains early-stage programs. He has over 30 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Dr. Benatti serves as the Chief Executive Officer and a Director of EryDel S.p.A., a private biotechnology company focused on rare diseases. Prior to EryDel, Dr. Benatti was Co-founder and CEO of Newron Pharmaceuticals S.p.A. Under his leadership, Newron developed a pipeline of innovative therapies including Xadago, approved worldwide for the treatment of Parkinson's Disease. Previously, Dr. Benatti held research and development positions at Pharmacia & Upjohn and its predecessor companies. Dr. Benatti has authored several scientific publications and holds a number of patents. He currently serves as a director of Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Newron Pharmaceuticals S.p.A. and Metis Precision Medicine. Dr. Benatti also serves as chairman of Italian Angels for Biotech, a member of the Advisory Board of the Sofinnova Telethon Fund, and as a member of the Development and of the Strategic Advisory Boards of Zambon S.p.A. Dr. Benatti graduated and performed post-doctoral work at the Milano Genetics Institute.

Story continues

Samuel Broder, M.D.Dr. Broder has been at the forefront of science and medicine in many diverse arenas throughout his career. He is the former Director of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), appointed by President Ronald Reagan, where he oversaw the development of numerous anti-cancer therapeutic agents, as well as the first three agents approved by the FDA specifically to treat the AIDS virus. In addition, Dr. Broder oversaw the launch of several large-scale clinical trials related to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer. He has held various executive positions within biopharmaceuticals companies, including EVP for Medical Affairs and Chief Medical Officer at Celera Corporation where he helped advance the human genome project. He is the author and co-author of over 340 scientific publications and holds many patents. Dr. Broder was elected to the National Academy of Medicine in 1993. He graduated from the University of Michigan Medical School and completed his residency in Internal Medicine at Stanford University.

Lorenzo Leoni, Ph.D.Dr. Leoni is a scientific serial entrepreneur and founder of six biomedical companies in the US and in Europe with an extensive network within academic, financial and industrial biotech and medtech industries. Mr. Leoni is a co-founder of Gain Therapeutics and currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Industrie Biomediche Insubri SA, a board member of Artificaly SA, and a managing partner of TiVenture SA, investing in biomedical, medical devices, industrial high-tech, digital health and other high potential companies. Dr. Leoni received his Ph.D. in biochemistry from University of Lausanne and completed his post-doctoral fellowship at the University of California San Diego, where he served as Assistant Professor in the department of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology.

Joanne Taylor, Ph.D.Dr. Taylor has over 25 years experience in the neuroscience industry. She served as vice president for Prescient Healthcare Group where she headed up their neuroscience business, advising on portfolio, clinical and regulatory strategies of a wide array of global top 25 pharmaceutical company clients. While at Eisais London Research Laboratories and European Headquarters, she directed global teams in the discovery of novel therapeutic strategies for neurological conditions, such as Alzheimers, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinsons Disease. Dr. Taylor received a Ph.D. in Developmental Neuroscience from Kings College London and completed a postdoctoral fellowship and senior research post at the ETH in Zurich.

Michel Vellard, Ph.D.Dr. Vellard currently serves as chief scientific officer for Home Biosciences. He has over 25 years of experience in translational biology, including co-founding Audacity Therapeutics, serving as vice president of research at Ultragenyx Pharmaceuticals, and head of lysosomal biology and principal scientist at BioMarin. More than 10 rare diseases treatments that Dr. Vellard has worked on have been approved by the FDA and EMA (enzyme replacement therapy for Morquio syndrome approved in 2014, etc.). Dr. Vellard holds multiple patents and has authored and co-authored many research publications. He received his Ph.D. in Virology from Pasteur and Curie Institutes and from Paris VI, VII, XI Universities. Dr. Vellard accomplished his post-doctoral fellowship at UCLA.

About Gain Therapeutics, Inc. Gain Therapeutics, Inc. is positioned at the confluence of technology and healthcare and focused on redefining drug discovery with its SEE-Tx target identification platform. By identifying and optimizing allosteric binding sites that have never before been targeted, Gain is unlocking new treatment options for difficult-to-treat disorders characterized by protein misfolding. Gain was established in 2017 with the support of its founders and institutional investors. It has been awarded funding support from The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinsons Research (MJFF) and The Silverstein Foundation for Parkinsons with GBA, as well as from the Eurostars-2 joint program with co-funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 research and Innosuisse. In July 2020, Gain Therapeutics, Inc. completed a share exchange with Gain Therapeutics, SA, a Swiss corporation, whereby GT Gain Therapeutics SA became a wholly owned subsidiary of Gain Therapeutics, Inc.

For more information, please visit https://www.gaintherapeutics.com

Forward-Looking StatementsAny statements in this release that are not historical facts may be considered to be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on managements current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause results to differ materially and adversely from the statements contained herein. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the market opportunity for Gains product candidates, the business strategies and development plans of Gain, and the timing of preclinical and clinical studies. Some of the potential risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from those expected include Gains ability to: make commercially available its products and technologies in a timely manner or at all; enter into strategic alliances, including arrangements for the development and distribution of its products; obtain intellectual property protection for its assets; accurately estimate and manage its expenses and cash burn and raise additional funds when necessary. Undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. Except as required by law, Gain does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect new information, events or circumstances after the date they are made, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Investor & Media Contacts:Gain Therapeutics Investor Contact:Daniel FerryLifeSci Advisors+1 (617) 430-7576daniel@lifesciadvisors.com

Gain Therapeutics Media Contact:Joleen SchultzJoleen Schultz & Associates+1 760-271-8150joleen@joleenschultzassociates.com

Link:
Gain Therapeutics, Inc. Announces Appointment of Five Members to its Newly Formed Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) - Yahoo Finance

Posted in Human Genetics | Comments Off on Gain Therapeutics, Inc. Announces Appointment of Five Members to its Newly Formed Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) – Yahoo Finance

Hookworms have potential to protect soldiers from chemical, biological weapons Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis – Washington…

Posted: at 5:22 pm

Visit the News Hub

Grant funds development of living factories to produce antibodies, anti-nerve agents

Researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis have received a grant to develop the next generation of personal protective equipment (PPE) for combat troops. Harnessing the genetics of hookworms, the research is focused on developing "living factories" that produce antibodies and anti-nerve agents to protect against chemical and biological weapons.

Combat troops require special equipment to guard against chemical and biological agents that could be unleashed in a war zone. While such suits and respirators can protect against chemical and biological weapons, they are cumbersome and can limit mobility at the worst possible times.

Researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis hope to improve soldiers options by developing the next generation of combat-ready personal protective equipment (PPE). Funding the work is a subcontract to the School of Medicine that is part of a $16.4 million contract awarded to U.S. research and development company Charles River Analytics from the U.S. governments Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

The goal is to develop personalized protective biosystems that would include living factories of organisms genetically engineered to produce anti-nerve agents, antibodies or other biological antidotes to a variety of chemical or biological threats. The idea is that these living factories somewhat like the commensal bacteria comprising the gut microbiome would create a symbiotic relationship with the human body, secreting protective molecules into the bloodstream that could neutralize nerve agents or block weaponized viruses.

To achieve these goals, the Washington University team will harness knowledge of the genetics of helminths more specifically, organisms commonly known as hookworms.

We will explore ways to use hookworms to generate prophylactic molecules within a subjects body to neutralize threats that soldiers may encounter in war zones or other high-risk environments, said Makedonka Mitreva, PhD, a professor of medicine and of genetics.

Mitreva

Hookworms have evolved a sophisticated system to secrete molecules that allow them live in the healthy human gut for many years without causing major health problems, she said. Research has demonstrated that controlled hookworm infections in experimental settings do not cause adverse effects in healthy people. So, we will harness these elements of controlled hookworm infection, along with our ability to genetically modify these organisms to produce antibodies or other proteins that act as protective molecules from within the human body, to develop a next-generation system to protect combat troops from chemical and biological threats.

The hookworms potentially could be engineered to secrete enzymes that break apart or block neurotoxins, such as sarin gas, for example. Similarly, the hookworms could be genetically engineered to produce antibodies against dangerous bacteria, such as anthrax, or life-threatening viruses, such as Ebola and SARS-CoV-2.

Washington University is one of several subcontractor institutions funded on this contract by DARPA to develop advanced PPE for combat troops. Charles River Analytics in Cambridge, Mass., will lead the collaborators, which also include Baylor College of Medicine in Houston; George Washington University in Washington, D.C.; James Cook University in Australia; Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands; and the University of California, Irvine.

The Food and Drug Administration already has approved certain helminths, including hookworms, for investigational use in human clinical trials. Some of these helminths live in the upper intestine, and scientists are investigating their use in the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders and other diseases.

Some of the molecules that hookworms secrete have anti-inflammatory properties, Mitreva said. These organisms can survive longer when the environment they live in is healthy. So, they do what they can to help maintain that healthy gut environment. Because of this, other research groups have investigated certain helminths as therapies for inflammatory gastrointestinal diseases.

Mitreva also explained that hookworms cant reproduce inside the human gut, so in a controlled environment, the hookworms that make up the initial therapy can remain there for years without causing problems. Hookworms have a complex life cycle that includes free-living eggs and early larvae stages that must take place in soil. In a natural infection, people typically become infected by walking barefoot in parts of the world where hookworms are endemic. Such infections can lead to malnutrition in young children or cause health problems in those who are immunocompromised. But controlled hookworm infections with a set number of organisms given in a clinical trial setting have not been shown to cause problems in healthy adults. The infections also can be cleared from the body with widely available anti-helminthic drugs.

While Washington University researchers, including Sergej Djuranovic, PhD, an associate professor of cell biology & physiology, will focus on studying hookworms, other collaborators will work to develop other helminth species as living factories, and still others will focus on lightweight, flexible materials to produce personal protective garments that are easier to wear than current PPE for long periods of time and are more protective against chemical and biological threats.

This material is based upon work supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific, (NIWC Pacific) under Contract No. N66001-21-C-4013. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the DARPA or NIWC Pacific. Approved for public release, distribution unlimited.

Washington University School of Medicines 1,700 faculty physicians also are the medical staff of Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Childrens hospitals. The School of Medicine is a leader in medical research, teaching and patient care, consistently ranking among the top medical schools in the nation by U.S. News & World Report. Through its affiliations with Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Childrens hospitals, the School of Medicine is linked to BJC HealthCare.

Read this article:
Hookworms have potential to protect soldiers from chemical, biological weapons Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis - Washington...

Posted in Human Genetics | Comments Off on Hookworms have potential to protect soldiers from chemical, biological weapons Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis – Washington…

Elon Musk and tech-bro futurism – The Signal – The Signal

Posted: at 5:21 pm

Technology has played a crucial role in the development of human society. Many of the wide-scale cultural and societal shifts that have taken place throughout history came from developing those new technologies.

The Industrial Revolution, which introduced several engine or motor-powered devices that significantly improved technological production, was the start of the celebrity inventor. Since then, the people credited with inventing new and essential technologies have become superstars.

In the early 20th century, people celebrated figures like Thomas Edison and Henry Ford for their intellect and creativity pushing the world forward. Though times have changed, society still loves these enigmatic inventor types.

Recently, tech industry giants like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs have quickly filled that role. Of this particular mold, however, the most recent and widely known incarnation is easily Elon Musk.

Musk is well known for being the CEO or founder of a few different companies, including The Boring Company, SpaceX and Tesla. Elon has differentiated himself from other billionaire types with his comparatively jovial attitude.

Unlike Warren Buffet, who plays to his professionalism and wisdom, Musks persona is more akin to a combination of Tony Stark and Alan Turing if they used Reddit.

While Musks name is synonymous with technological advancement, his utility to these projects is minimal.

As an example, he bought the right to be named founder of Tesla after purchasing the company. His inputs on his creations also range from short-sighted to downright unscientific.

One of Musks brain-rotting ideas for the future is the Hyperloop, a proposed public transit method in which a train would move throughout the country at airline speeds. Musk has previously criticized public transportation for not offering enough agency to the individual and its shared nature.

The most glaring design flaw of the concept is that shooting an object with people inside it through a high-velocity vacuum tube would most likely destroy the vehicle, killing everyone inside.

Even if Mr. Musks feelings about the death toll of his products were not already in question, several infrastructural issues would arise from the creation of this system.

Musk claims the project will cost a whopping $17 million. However, a feasibility analysis by the Department of Transportation suggests that it could cost ten times that.

There is, of course, the main issue of usability when it comes to The Hyperloop. The trains only serve around 23 passengers, making them more expensive than our current train technology.

Public transit efforts require the organizational structure of centralized public authority to build the groundwork for such improvements, as public transit projects are notoriously large and expensive.

It is telling that Musks ideas about public transit in a country where budgets for transportation are perpetually bleeding and ignore urban areas cater to the rich. If Musk truly cared about the necessity for more transit options, he would invest in proven solutions.

When considering Musks visions, it is vital to understand the power and influence of being a billionaire and a significant player in the technologies industry. This influence is evident in the fact that the price of Dogecoin is, at times, dictated by when he talks about his support of a coup in Bolivia for lithium extraction.

Besides The Hyperloop, Elon Musks other wide-sweeping plan for humanity is the continued exploration of space and the colonization of Mars. Musk and other advocates for Mars colonization reason that we need to find somewhere else to live due to the catastrophic effects of climate change that have and will continue to happen.

This line of thinking seems to be the most doomed manifestation of climate grief, which legitimately posits that as a species, we cannot and should not try to improve conditions on the planet we already inhabit.

The reality of the situation is, the colonization of Mars will inevitably be very difficult. It will take a long time, it will be expensive, and it will be dangerous.

Seven billion people cannot afford to wait decades and have to pay to go to a planet alien to us and utterly unsuitable for survival. Musk is most likely aware of the criticisms people have levied at his ideas and character and does not care.

I doubt the idiocy of his ideas is lost on him and might even go so far as to say it is intentional. Creating an entirely new public transit method is so obviously superfluous, and Elons hangups with current public transit methods are either so shallow they arent worth addressing or, like most public services in the US, arent worth addressing not being funded enough.

It is entirely possible that Musks project is intentionally inaccessible and unprofitable, as it would mainly serve as a fun toy for other wealthy elites to try out, safe from any unwashed masses they may have to encounter. This idea goes double for his Mars mission plans.

Most working people can barely afford a plane ticket to go to another part of our planet. It is unlikely that those same people will have the money for a visa to Mars!

Mars colonies will, without a doubt, be a haven for the rich as they continue to worsen our current climate conditions because they can afford a safer option.

They will, of course, not experimentally see the place for themselves as that would be dangerous (we can, however, accurately predict the socioeconomic status of the people who will be doing so).

In Elons world, the rest of us will stay here on Earth and die with it. Individualized solutions for select people cannot be what saves our species.

If we hope to end our struggles with our climate, it will require a massive reconfiguration of our lives and production. Our current capitalist modes of production are unsustainable, and we cannot take pointers from one of the men who perpetuate it.

Elon Musk is a billionaire who laments the life of privilege he inherited through Zambian emerald mine earnings. He is simply too disconnected from the general populace on a material level to have a coherent solution to the problems that affect us possibly.

Originally posted here:
Elon Musk and tech-bro futurism - The Signal - The Signal

Posted in Mars Colonization | Comments Off on Elon Musk and tech-bro futurism – The Signal – The Signal

Biologic, Antirheumatic Drug Use May Increase Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Psoriasis – AJMC.com Managed Markets Network

Posted: at 5:18 pm

Pregnant women with psoriasis were found to be at increased risk of experiencing preterm birth and Cesarean delivery, with patients undergoing anti-rheumatic treatment during their first pregnancy indicated to be at significantly greater risk.

Risk of preterm birth and Cesarean delivery may be elevated in women with psoriasis, especially those undergoing anti-rheumatic treatment during pregnancy. Study findings were published recently in Arthritis & Rheumatology.

Known to impact women in childbearing age, psoriasis has been found, albeit in scarce data, to be associated with several maternal and neonatal pregnancy outcomes. Moreover, adverse links regarding rheumatic disease and pregnancy outcomes have indicated that disease activity/severity may play a key role, as well as the therapies used to manage symptoms.

As ongoing anti-rheumatic treatment around the time of pregnancy often is required to control disease activity of psoriasis, one may hypothesize that women treated with anti-rheumatic drugs before/during pregnancy have a more severe and active psoriasis disease compared to untreated women, noted researchers. Anti-rheumatic treatment may on the other hand improve clinical and inflammatory measures.

Seeking to further assess risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with and without psoriasis, as well as how anti-rheumatic treatment before and during pregnancy affects these outcomes, they conducted a nationwide cohort study of Swedish women with psoriasis (n = 921) and those without (n = 9210) during respective pregnancies between 2007 to 2017 (matched 1:10 on maternal age, year, and parity).

In the analysis, risk was stratified for presence, timing, and type of anti-rheumatic treatment, which included oral corticosteroids and conventional or biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Further adjustments were made for body mass index (BMI), smoking, educational level, and country of birth (Nordic or non-Nordic), with the outcome preterm birth stratified by parity (primiparous or parous).

Psoriasis pregnancies were divided into 495 psoriasis pregnancies without any treatment one year before pregnancy up until delivery and 426 psoriasis pregnancies with presence of any anti-rheumatic treatment in the same time frame, added researchers.

The latter pregnancies were further stratified into 170 pregnancies with treatment only in the year before pregnancy (ie, no treatment during pregnancy) and 237 pregnancies with treatment both in the year before and during pregnancy19 pregnancies with treatment only during pregnancy were added to the 237 pregnanciesresulting in 256 pregnancies with anti-rheumatic treatment during pregnancy.

Among the study cohort, women with psoriasis pregnancies were shown to be more often born in Nordic countries, (91.8% vs. 82.8%) and more likely to be obese (19.9% vs. 12.6%), a smoker at first antenatal visit (9.2% vs. 5.3%), and have a higher level of education (> 12 years; 50.1% vs 43.3%) than those without psoriasis during pregnancy. Diagnosis of pre-gestational hypertension and diabetes were also more likely in women with psoriasis pregnancies.

In comparing women with and without psoriasis during pregnancy, those with psoriasis were found to be at significantly increased risk of preterm birth (adjusted OR (aOR), 1.69; 95% CI, 1.27-2.24) and Cesarean delivery, including both elective (aOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.43-2.20) and emergency procedures (aOR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.10-1.84).

No differences in risk were observed in psoriasis pregnancies compared with non-psoriasis pregnancies for incidence of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes or hypertension, and neonate born small for gestational age or large for gestational age.

Regarding anti-rheumatic drugs, adverse pregnancy risks were shown to differ with presence, timing, and type of treatment. Notably, the most increased risks were observed in women with psoriasis pregnancies who underwent anti-rheumatic treatment during pregnancy, especially those treated with biologics:

Furthermore, a statistically significant increased risk in all analyses of preterm birth was found in women with psoriasis undergoing their first pregnancy, compared with matched first-pregnancy controls, particularly those treated with anti-rheumatic treatment during pregnancy (aOR, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.43-10.95).

No difference in risk of preterm birth was observed in analyses of subsequent pregnancies comparing psoriasis with non-psoriasis pregnancies.

Speaking on the study findings, researchers concluded that all women with psoriasis, regardless of anti-rheumatic treatment, should be counseled about pregnancy outcomes and receive individualized monitoring during pregnancy.

Reference

Remaeus K, Johansson K, Granath F, Stephansson O, Hellgren K. Pregnancy outcomes in women with psoriatic arthritis with respect to presence and timing of antirheumatic treatment. Arthritis Rheumatol. Published online October 20, 2021. doi:10.1002/art.41985

Read the original post:
Biologic, Antirheumatic Drug Use May Increase Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Psoriasis - AJMC.com Managed Markets Network

Posted in Psoriasis | Comments Off on Biologic, Antirheumatic Drug Use May Increase Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Psoriasis – AJMC.com Managed Markets Network

COVID-19 Vaccines and Psoriasis: Safety and Effectiveness – Healthline

Posted: at 5:18 pm

Psoriasis is a chronic condition in which itchy, red patches appear on the skin. It happens when the immune system becomes dysfunctional, leading to increases in inflammation in the body and the rapid accumulation of skin cells.

Since psoriasis is an immune-mediated condition, its common treatments involve the use of drugs that suppress the immune system. These can include:

Because these drugs weaken the immune system, some people with psoriasis may be concerned about receiving COVID-19 vaccines. COVID-19 vaccines are both safe and effective for people with psoriasis.

Lets dive deeper into what we know so far about COVID-19 vaccines and psoriasis medications.

Currently, all of the available evidence suggests that COVID-19 vaccines are safe for people taking psoriasis medications.

Lets explore some of the concerns regarding vaccine safety for people with the condition.

Psoriasis medications can weaken the immune system. This makes people taking these medications more vulnerable to contracting and becoming seriously ill with various infections.

Similarly, vaccines containing live versions of a germ arent typically used in people with a weakened immune system, as they may replicate in the body and cause illness. Some examples are the flu nasal spray vaccine and the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine.

However, none of the currently available COVID-19 vaccines contain live virus. Instead, they contain either an mRNA molecule or a modified adenovirus that cannot replicate within the body.

While researchers continue to study COVID-19 vaccines in people with a weakened immune system, research indicates that other inactivated vaccines, such as the flu shot and the hepatitis B vaccine, are safe for people with immune-mediated inflammatory conditions like psoriasis.

However, vaccination may trigger a flare of any autoimmune condition, including psoriasis. Its important to discuss this possibility with your doctor.

Methotrexate was initially used to treat cancer, but was approved to treat severe psoriasis in the 1970s. It works by inhibiting an enzyme that leads to rapid skin cell growth.

One of the potential side effects of taking methotrexate is a weakened immune system, specifically due to low levels of infection-fighting white blood cells. This increases infection risk.

Because of this, people taking methotrexate are at an increased risk of serious illness from COVID-19. This makes vaccination vital.

People taking methotrexate are not at an increased risk from the COVID-19 vaccine. However, it appears as if those taking methotrexate generate a reduced immune response to COVID-19 vaccination. More on that later.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), researchers are still learning how well COVID-19 vaccines protect people with a weakened immune system, including those on immunosuppressive drugs.

In fact, people taking immunosuppressive drugs were excluded from the COVID-19 vaccine trials. This is actually a standard practice for vaccine trials. It allows researchers to evaluate the immune response to the vaccine without the confounding effects of immunosuppressive drugs.

Future research will examine those with weakened immune systems more closely. For now, we do have indications that the COVID-19 vaccine is effective for those taking psoriasis medications, particularly biologics.

Two 2021 reports on people taking biologics for psoriasis found that antibodies to the novel coronavirus spike protein were developed following vaccination. How long this protection lasts is currently unknown, though.

Current data suggests that the immune response to COVID-19 vaccination may not be as strong in people taking methotrexate.

A 2021 study compared the immune response to the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine:

Another 2021 study supported these findings. It compared the immune response to two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in both healthy individuals and people with immune-mediated inflammatory conditions, predominantly those with psoriasis:

You may now be wondering why the immune response to the COVID-19 vaccine seems to be lower in people taking methotrexate compared to those taking biologics. The answer could be the ways that these medications impact the immune system.

Biologics only target very specific parts of the immune system. Traditional immunosuppressants like methotrexate are very general in their effects. It could be that this broader effect could be dampening the immune response to the COVID-19 vaccine in people taking methotrexate.

Its important for people with psoriasis to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. The CDC recommends that everyone aged 12 and older get vaccinated for COVID-19.

Additionally, a task force organized by the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) recommends that all people who dont have contraindications to the vaccines receive it as soon as its available to them.

Taking psoriasis medications is not a contraindication for COVID-19 vaccination. In fact, the NPF task force recommends that those receiving the COVID-19 vaccine continue to take their psoriasis medications in most cases.

They do note that some people taking methotrexate may, in consultation with their doctor, suspend their medication for 2 weeks after vaccination to help promote an improved immune response. This guidance applies to people who meet all of the following criteria:

According to the CDC, the only contraindications for a COVID-19 vaccine are:

People with a weakened immune system that have received both doses of either mRNA vaccine may not develop the same level of immunity as those with a healthy immune system.

This includes people that are actively taking immunosuppressive medications, such as psoriasis medications.

The CDC recommends that individuals who are moderately to severely immunocompromised receive a booster shot at least 28 days after their second dose. The aim is to improve the immune response from the initial vaccine series.

Currently, this only applies to the two mRNA vaccines: Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna. Additional data is needed to determine the benefits of a vaccine booster in individuals who received the Johnson and Johnson vaccine.

The NPF task force also recommends that individuals with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis that are currently taking immunosuppressive drugs should receive a booster shot.

Theyve also identified groups that are more likely to benefit from a booster, including people:

Now that weve discussed COVID-19 vaccinations and psoriasis, you may be curious if the COVID-19 vaccines can cause or exacerbate psoriasis.

Theres currently no evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines can cause psoriasis.

Other vaccines, specifically the flu shots used between 2009 and 2010, have been linked with new-onset psoriasis.

However, the authors of the 2015 study reporting this finding note that in addition to it being very rare, they could not directly prove a direct causative relationship between the vaccine and psoriasis.

Vaccine-related psoriasis flares are a concern for some. A 2021 study of 142 people who were reluctant to receive a COVID-19 vaccine found that 21 percent listed the risk of a psoriasis flare as a concern.

There have been reports of psoriasis flares following COVID-19 vaccination. However, researchers have been unable to directly link them to the vaccines themselves.

Its important to note that, in these reports, people experiencing a flare after vaccination were reported to either not be taking any medications for their psoriasis or only be using topical treatments to manage their condition.

Three further reports have found that people taking psoriasis medications, specifically biologics, experienced no flares after COVID-19 vaccination. However, whether certain treatments affect the likelihood of a flare after vaccination is currently unknown.

Additionally, other factors may lead to psoriasis flares, with stress being one example. Its possible that stress related to the pandemic or to receiving a vaccination could contribute to a flare after vaccination.

Trauma to the skin, including injections, can also lead to psoriasis symptoms at the injury site. This is called the Koebner phenomenon. The incidence of the Koebner phenomenon is estimated to be between 11 to 75 percent in people with psoriasis.

Medications for psoriasis can weaken the immune system. Because of this, people with psoriasis may be at an increased risk of serious illness from COVID-19.

The available evidence indicates that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective for people taking psoriasis medications. Additionally, taking psoriasis medications isnt a contraindication for vaccination.

The NPF recommends that people with psoriasis receive the vaccine as soon as they can. Additionally, booster vaccines are now recommended for immunosuppressed people, including those taking certain psoriasis medications.

If you have concerns about receiving the COVID-19 vaccine or how your psoriasis medications will impact the vaccine, be sure to discuss them with a doctor.

Go here to see the original:
COVID-19 Vaccines and Psoriasis: Safety and Effectiveness - Healthline

Posted in Psoriasis | Comments Off on COVID-19 Vaccines and Psoriasis: Safety and Effectiveness – Healthline

Page 687«..1020..686687688689..700710..»