The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Category Archives: Transhuman News
Tech Trojan Horse: How the Senate is poised to codify censorship of social media | TheHill – The Hill
Posted: March 11, 2022 at 11:23 am
Beware of politicians bearing reforms. Since the Trojans first wheeled awooden horseinto their fortified city, many are leery about "gifts" that may be heavily laden with dangers. That is true with the Trojan horse legislation just offered by Sen. Amy KlobucharAmy KlobucharDemocrats hunt for the right campaign stars Elton John, Vladimir Putin and my last conversation with Colin Powell Tech Trojan Horse: How the Senate is poised to codify censorship of social media MORE (D-Minn.). In the name of "reforming" the internet and bringing tech monopolies to heel, Klobuchar has penned a "Nudge Act" that would expand corporate censorship and speech controls.
Even the name is designed to be non-threatening. After all, who could oppose an act titled "Nudging Users to Drive Good Experiences on Social Media"? It isenough to garnerthe support of Sen. Cynthia LummisCynthia Marie LummisGOP demands delay vote on spending, Ukraine aid Tech Trojan Horse: How the Senate is poised to codify censorship of social media Senate conservatives threaten to hold up government funding over vaccine mandate MORE (R-Wyo.). The act, however, is less of a nudge and more of a shove toward approved content and choices.
For years, PresidentJoe BidenandDemocratic membersof Congresshave pushed for greater and greater censorship on the internet and on social media. Liberals have found awinning strategy in using corporate censorshipto circumvent constitutional limits on governmental speech controls. Senators like Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.)warnedsocial media companies that they would not tolerate any backsliding or retrenching by failing to take action against dangerous disinformation, and demanded robust content modification to block disfavored views on subjects ranging from climate control to elections to the pandemic.
The Nudge Act is arguably the most insidious of these efforts. Under the Act, Congress would enlist the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NAS) to recommend sweeping design changes to Big Tech platforms like Facebook, Instagram and YouTube to reduce the harms of algorithmic amplification and social media addiction.
The Act is a masterpiece of doublespeak. It refers to developing content-agnostic interventions that would ultimately be enforced by a commission. That sounds great; after all, many of us have called for years for areturn to content neutrality on social mediawhere sites function more as communication platforms, similar to telephone companies. However, that is clearly not the intent of the bills sponsors, who see it as a weapon against "misinformation." That wasmade clear by Klobuchar herself: "For too long, tech companies have said Trust us, weve got this. But we know that social media platforms have repeatedly put profits over people, with algorithms pushing dangerous content that hooks users and spreads misinformation.
Liberal groups like Public Knowledge which support the bill also openly discuss its real purpose, declaring that it will halt the promotion of misinformation" anddevelop new avenues"to reduce the spread of misinformation. Klobuchar has repeated such descriptionsin support of the bill.
How is combatting "misinformation" content-neutral? The answer will be imposed by a new commission that can declare a sites failure to take appropriate measures as constituting unfair or deceptive acts or practices. That would create a glacial chilling effect on these companies, which will err on the side of censorship. After all, Democrats have maintained for years that "misinformation" is simply false and not really a matter a partisan content discrimination.With Nudge, Klobuchar seems to be making her own Trust us, weve got this" pledge to fellow Democrats.
The key term used in the Act is "algorithmic amplification." Klobuchar makes clear the intent to use algorithms to stop "pushing dangerous content." Democrats in Congress have argued for years that these companies need to protect citizens from bad choices by using beneficent algorithms to guide us to healthier" viewing and reading habits.
The most extreme effort wasa letter from Democratic membersto pressure companies like AT&T to reconsider whether viewers should be allowed to watch Fox News and other networks. It does not matter that Fox News is the most popular news cable station and even hasa greater percentage of Democratic viewers than CNN.(For the record, I appear as a legal analyst on Fox). The members insistedthatnot all TV news sources are the same and called on these companies to protect viewers from dissemination of false viewpoints.
Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenDemocrats hunt for the right campaign stars 'Urgent' COVID-19 funding hangs in balance amid partisan fight Tech Trojan Horse: How the Senate is poised to codify censorship of social media MORE (D-Mass.) hascalled for these companies to protect citizens from poor reading choicesby tweaking algorithms to steer them away from disfavored views. It is the free-speech version of therejected "Big Gulp" laws. Warren wants companies to amplify true books on issues like climate change and direct searches away from misleading books.
Some liberal think tanks admit it is not clear that such manipulation of information will help, yet they still appear all-in on trying.Brookings Institution declared:"Even though cause and effect are hard to discern in social media, it is undeniable that algorithms contribute to hate speech and other information disorder on social media.
If the Senate truly wanted content neutrality, it would not requirea new army of internet apparatchiks. It would condition the continued immunity protection under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act on removing "content modification" and amplification programs. Instead, it seeks to place content under the oversight of a commission while reaffirming the need to stop, in Klobuchars words, the spread of misinformation.
There are aspects of the law that are positive, like the study of social media addiction and requirements for greater transparency from these companies. However, Congress is adept at the art of Trojan-horse legislation, and it is hard to argue against "studying" issues and recommending changes. Yet, this bill is designed to create a new system of content review and revision. It isviewed by the industryas designed "to slow down how misinformation or other harmful content spreads on social media.
A governmental regulation combatting misinformation likely would be unconstitutional. However, the obvious desire is for these companies to self-regulate and avoid any problems through the "robust content modification" demanded by Democrats. Moreover, it is not clear how courts would react to circuit-breaker tactics that limit or slow the dissemination of information, though this also could "neutrally" slow all stories of public importance from going viral.
Despite the unrelenting campaign against free speech in Congress, there remain political and constitutional barriers that have proven insurmountable thus far.In this case, the crack troops hidden within Klobuchars wooden horse are expected to be thestaffof the NAS and the FTC, who could cloak content modification in pseudo-scientific terms. They would be assisted by an increasingly anti-free speech media and academia, including the World Health Organizations chief whorecently supported censorshipto combat "the infodemic."
Before this Trojan Horse is wheeled into our own lives, Americans should consider whats inside the Nudge Act.
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University.Follow him on Twitter@JonathanTurley.
Follow this link:
Tech Trojan Horse: How the Senate is poised to codify censorship of social media | TheHill - The Hill
Posted in Censorship
Comments Off on Tech Trojan Horse: How the Senate is poised to codify censorship of social media | TheHill – The Hill
China’s Censorship, Propaganda Push Russian Version Of The War In Ukraine – Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty
Posted: at 11:23 am
While international audiences saw images of besieged Ukrainian cities and thousands of civilians fleeing the country through humanitarian corridors that have faced Russian bombardment, Chinese viewers were shown Russian aid convoys bringing supplies to beleaguered Ukrainians.
China's People's Daily, the official newspaper of the Communist Party, posted a video on March 9 on Weibo, the popular Chinese social-media platform, showing Russia providing humanitarian aid to Ukrainians outside Kharkiv, a Ukrainian city near the Russian border that has faced artillery and rocket attacks since Moscow's February 24 invasion. The video received more than 3 million views.
In other coverage, the Moscow correspondent of China's Phoenix TV has issued reports while embedded with Russian troops outside of Mariupol, a strategic port city that is the scene of stiff fighting. In a recent clip he speaks with soldiers about their steady advance and talks to civilians allegedly welcoming the presence of Russian forces.
Since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, China's tightly controlled media and heavily censored Internet have provided increasingly skewed coverage, omitting details on civilian casualties and the widespread international condemnation of Moscow, while quoting Russia's own state-backed networks and broadcasting the views of Russian officials -- without verification or pushback -- to its domestic audience.
While Beijing is threading the needle diplomatically and looking to put breathing room between it and its close ties with the Kremlin in the face of mounting international pressure over its invasion of Ukraine, China's state media and vocal officials are increasingly converging with Moscow's distorted narrative of the war -- even beginning to push conspiracy theories against Ukraine and the West in the process.
"U.S. biolabs in Ukraine have indeed attracted much attention recently," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said on March 8, echoing a conspiracy theory regularly pushed by Russian media and online accounts that some Western officials charge could be part of an effort by the Kremlin to justify its invasion by saying that Ukraine is working on biological or nuclear weapons.
"All dangerous pathogens in Ukraine must be stored in these labs and all research activities are led by the U.S. side," Zhao added, without providing evidence to support the claim. U.S. and Ukrainian officials say the allegation is baseless.
China, Russia, And The Ukraine War
The biolab theory has been a mainstay of Russian state media -- and even some embassy accounts on social media -- with a recent report by Foreign Policy magazine highlighting how it has taken hold among American far-right online conspiracy networks and spread to other countries as well.
It is also not the first time it has been referenced by Chinese officials, with Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying first raising the claim about biolabs in Ukraine during a May 2021 press conference.
Chinese diplomats have also frequently pointed to Fort Detrick -- a U.S. military facility in Maryland that the Soviet Union falsely claimed in the 1980s was the source of the virus causing AIDS and has often been a target of Russian disinformation -- to deflect questions when asked about the origins of COVID-19.
But the timing and renewed push of the theory could be part of a wider strategy, with Britain's Defense Ministry tweeting on March 8 that while the baseless claims are long-standing (Ukraine has stated that it has no such facilities), they "are currently likely being amplified as part of a retrospective justification for Russia's invasion of Ukraine."
The biolab story also fits with a growing trend of convergence between Chinese and Russian sources that has accelerated since the war in Ukraine, with false and misleading stories echoed by Chinese media and receiving hundreds of millions of views on Weibo in the process.
Throughout the war, Chinese media have helped spread dubious Russian-state narratives about Ukrainian forces using civilians as human shields while also saying the Russian military only goes after other military targets, despite the shelling of dozens of apartment blocks and other civilian structures.
WATCH: CCTV video has surfaced showing a car carrying two pensioners being blown apart by an armored column at a crossroads in Makariv in the Kyiv region on February 28.
Chinese networks have also magnified and spread Russian disinformation, such as when Chinese state broadcaster CCTV quoted Russian officials to falsely claim that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy had fled the capital, or when the state-backed Global Times, citing the Russian state network RT as its only source, said many Ukrainian soldiers had surrendered on the first day of the invasion.
Taken together, this highlights a different version of the war that viewers and online users are seeing in China compared to most of the world and how Chinese authorities have allowed the Kremlin's propaganda networks to shape its public's perception of the war with few restrictions.
For instance, the Kremlin-backed Sputnik has over 11.6 million followers on Weibo and other Russian outlets also have large and engaged followings inside China, where access to many other foreign media outlets and major information sites are blocked or restricted.
This has contributed to Russian claims about Ukrainian officials being extremists and neo-Nazis to be regularly adopted online and also picked up by Chinese-language outlets, which often reference the Azov Battalion -- a fringe unit of the Ukrainian National Guard known for having neo-Nazi sympathizers in its ranks -- and show it as representative of wider Ukrainian society.
More Than Censorship
Control of all Chinese media by the Communist Party and intensive Internet censorship make it difficult to gauge public opinion, while pervasive censorship also means the pro-Russian sentiment online in China is likely not representative of the country as a whole.
But the types of content that are allowed online or published by state-backed media show what Chinese authorities want their population of 1.4 billion people to think.
China's government has neither condemned nor condoned Russia's war in Ukraine and has even refrained from calling it an "invasion." Both expressions of sympathy for Ukraine and support for Russia appear online and in social media, but criticism of Moscow is regularly censored, according to China Digital Times, a group that tracks Chinese censorship and online discussion at the University of California, Berkeley.
Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin have grown closer in recent years and heralded a new era in their ties during a joint meeting in Beijing on February 4.
While Russia's invasion of Ukraine has left Beijing awkwardly distancing itself diplomatically from the Kremlin, the shared messaging from both countries' state media shows that ties are still intact and they could be growing in the information space, an area where many experts say cooperation has been developing in recent years.
Xi and Putin have signed a variety of media-cooperation agreements over the years and have held a Sino-Russian media forum annually since 2015.
A December report by the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA) found that both China and Russia had played a central role in spreading COVID-related disinformation and propaganda throughout the pandemic. However, the report did not find clear-cut evidence of direct cooperation between Beijing and Moscow, instead noting that they "borrowed from and amplified each other's campaigns."
Similarly, a June report from the Carnegie Moscow Center found that while both countries' state-backed media and officials often echo similar talking points and narratives on world events, this is largely due to Beijing and Moscow having shared "strategic objectives" in global affairs.
"Chinese and Russian online behavior are largely the result of Chinese actors' careful but independent study of and creative adaptations of the Kremlin's tools, rather than an expression of active, ongoing cooperation between the two governments," the report noted.
Posted in Censorship
Comments Off on China’s Censorship, Propaganda Push Russian Version Of The War In Ukraine – Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty
Selective censorship? Facebook and Instagram to allow violent speech – if its targeted against Russia – Free Press Journal
Posted: at 11:23 am
Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has confirmed that it is changing its rules on violent speech in several countries because of the Ukraine invasion.
The company says that it has "temporarily" made allowances for violent speech - for example death to the Russian invaders - that would usually break its rules.
Meta said, though, it wont allow credible calls for violence against Russian civilians. The internal emails discussing the policy were obtained by Reuters.
The Reuters report says that posts that call for death to Russian President Vladimir Putin or Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko will be allowed in several countries.
The temporary policy change allowing for calls for violence against Russian soldiers applies to Armenia, Azerbaijan, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, and Ukraine, according to one email.
Moscow's internationally condemned attack on its neighbor has provoked unprecedented sanctions from Western governments and businesses, but also a surge of online anger and debates over social media's role in the war. The policy decision from Facebook and Instagram's parent Meta was met immediately with controversy, but the social media giant defended its change.
Meta, which counts billions of users globally across its apps, has previously struggled with what it would allow people to post in moments of upheaval.
In July 2021, the firm temporarily allowed posts calling for "death to Khamenei", referring to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, during protests that rocked the country.
Citing the Reuters story, Russia's embassy in the United States demanded that Washington stop the "extremist activities" of Meta.
"Users of Facebook & Instagram did not give the owners of these platforms the right to determine the criteria of truth and pit nations against each other," the embassy said on Twitter in a message that was also shared by their India office.
Since Moscow's invasion of Ukraine last month, Russian authorities have also stepped up pressure against independent media, though press freedoms in the country were already rapidly waning.
Moscow blocked Facebook and restricted Twitter the same day last week that it backed the imposition of jail terms on media publishing "false information" about the military.
(To receive our E-paper on whatsapp daily, please click here. We permit sharing of the paper's PDF on WhatsApp and other social media platforms.)
Posted in Censorship
Comments Off on Selective censorship? Facebook and Instagram to allow violent speech – if its targeted against Russia – Free Press Journal
Relativity Space Is Taking on SpaceX With 3D-Printed Rockets – Business Insider
Posted: March 8, 2022 at 10:50 pm
In 2015, two former Blue Origin and SpaceX employees set out to form a startup with the borderline outrageous goal of 3D printing rockets and eventually using the technology to help colonize Mars.
Today, Relativity Space is the world's second most valuable private space company behind Elon Musk's SpaceX, despite not having launched a single rocket.
Relativity, cofounded by Tim Ellis and Jordan Noone, has raised more than $1.3 billion with backing from investors including Mark Cuban and Jared Leto, has an estimated valuation of $4.2 billion, a 1 million square-foot headquarters in Long Beach, and more than 700 employees. Ellis formerly worked in Blue Origin's metal 3D printing division. Noone worked on SpaceX's Dragon spaceships and engines.
Mark Cuban was an early investor in Relativity, agreeing to entirely fund the startup's $500,000 seed round after Ellis and Noone cold emailed him. Other investors include Y Combinator, Social Capital, Fidelity, and Tiger Global.
Ellis told Insider in 2018 that he believes 3D printing will be crucial for an interplanetary future where humans can live on Mars. That means going big: Relativity's says its Stargate 3D printers are the largest in the world, and have controls driven by artificial intelligence. The startup has made two rockets named Terran 1 and Terran R almost entirely by 3D printing.
The tech also known as additive manufacturing isn't new to the industry: Many companies 3D print individual parts of their aircraft. But Relativity is the first to build the majority roughly 95% of its vehicles using the method. It drastically limits the number of parts it needs, and is a boon for speed. Relativity says it can build a rocket in 60 days, compared to the average time of a year to 18 months.
The first test launch of Terran 1 is expected to take place within the next few months from Cape Canaveral in Florida, after being delayed from a planned launch in late 2021. A Relativity spokesperson told TechCrunch last August that there was "no one single reason" the launch was delayed, but noted the pandemic has slowed some processes. It will be the first-ever launch of a 3D printed rocket, and Ellis told Space.com in January that the rocket is the largest metal 3D printed object ever.
Terran R, which Relativity announced in June 2021, is designed to be fully reusable, carry larger payloads than Terran 1, and compete with Space X's Falcon 9 rockets. It's expected to start launching from Cape Canaveral as soon as 2024. Once the business is up and running, Relativity plans to charge its customers roughly $12 million per launch. SpaceX currently charges $62 million per launch of the Falcon 9 rockets, though Elon Musk recently said the company's Starship reusable rockets will cost less than $10 million within two to three years.
When asked where he sees the startup in five years, Josh Brost, Relativity's vice president of business development, said the company will be hyper-focused on becoming a top rocket launch company, but hinted that the Stargate printers could eventually be used to make things other than rockets.
"I think long-term there's tremendous opportunities to use this manufacturing tech to make other products better in addition to rockets," he said.
David Giger, Relativity's vice president of engineering, told Insider that, in the future, he hopes to see other startups getting into the 3D print manufacturing space.
"I think it's necessary for society to move in this direction," he said. "If you look at traditional production facilities that have millions and millions of dollars invested into CapEx and equipment that can only make one product and it can't be changed without very high expense, I think we need to move away from that approach and have a much more versatile manufacturing process."
The rest is here:
Relativity Space Is Taking on SpaceX With 3D-Printed Rockets - Business Insider
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on Relativity Space Is Taking on SpaceX With 3D-Printed Rockets – Business Insider
Save 21% on Terraforming Mars and conquer the Red Planet – Space.com
Posted: at 10:50 pm
Terraforming Mars is now 21% off on Amazon, and which is a pretty stellar deal for the popular space board game.
This is a saving of over $14 for a popular space board game that revolves around galactic colonialization of Mars. Set in the 2400s, mankind is terraforming the red planet by trying to improve oxygen levels, raise the temperature and ocean coverage until the red planet becomes habitable.
While this is a good deal, if you want more in-depth coverage of space board games then be sure to check out our best space board games and space board games deals guides. If you like space games but this isn't quite the deal for you, then you can also check out our Lego space deals and best VR space games pages.
Not to mention this game features at the top of our best space board games, so now is a great time to grab a deal.
Suitable for one to five players aged 12 and above, Terraforming Mars is a great mix of entertainment - in colonizing another planet and playing with peers, and educational - learning about what it might actually take to do that.
Saving over $15 on a game that features at the top of our best space board games guide is a great deal. It provides hours of fun and there are even expansions to add more layers to this game too. Do you have what it takes to move mankind from one planet to another?
Follow Alexander Cox on Twitter@Coxy_97Official. Follow us on Twitter@Spacedotcomand onFacebook.
Read more:
Save 21% on Terraforming Mars and conquer the Red Planet - Space.com
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on Save 21% on Terraforming Mars and conquer the Red Planet – Space.com
The science of becoming "interplanetary": Could humans live in the asteroid belt? – Interesting Engineering
Posted: at 10:50 pm
Welcome back to ourongoing "Interplanetary Series." In our previous installments, we looked at what it would take to live on Mercury, Venus, the Moon, and Mars. Today, we take a look at the Main Asteroid Belt. This massive region of space contains several large bodies that could one day be settled by human beings.
For decades, futurists and theorists have pondered the idea of establishing a permanent human presence and infrastructure in the Asteroid Belt. Its abundant resources and the fact that it occupies a strategic spot between the inner and outer Solar systems make it an attractive option for future exploration and development.
In fact, asteroid mining is considered a means to ensure our survival and usher in a period of post-scarcity for our civilization. While the challenges are certainly herculean, the benefits are rather enticing. With a little imagination and creative design, the Belt could also become an attractive destination for those looking for a little adventure tourism and fun in low gravity.
Some day, interplanetary tourists could be listening to messages like this:
"Good morning, passengers! Welcome aboard the ferry liner Kirkwood, your one-stop service to Ceres! For those among you that are first-timers, be prepared for fun, adventure, and some of the most luxurious accommodations in the Solar System! While you're our guest, we insist you take full advantage of the low-gravity environment and the exotic surface!"
"A reminder that making the transition from an Earth-normal gravity environment can be difficult. Report to a clinician if you find yourself experiencing any of the following symptoms: vertigo, dizziness, vomiting, fainting spells, or rapid heart rate. These can be signs that you are having trouble adjusting. But don't worry, our expert staff will help you find your footing (not a guarantee)!"
"Adventure tours include day trips to Ahuna Mons, the highest peak on Ceres,and Occator, the largest crater. We also recommend the multi-day excursions to the famous "bright spots," Cerealia Facula and the Vinalia Faculae. And be sure to check out the bright spots here, including five-star accommodations, dining, gaming, and recreation centers."
"Those who are transferring to Vesta or Pallas must first pass through customs and biomonitoring for a second screening. We apologize for the inconvenience but remind people that maintaining public health is a priority here in the Belt. After all, the air we breathe is a shared amenity, so let's keep it clean and healthy!"
"A reminder that the import of flora and fauna is strictly prohibited. Please respect the local life cycle and not attempt to take seeds or plants from the local biome. All species on Ceres are adapted to the local gravity and are not likely to survive in another environment."
The discovery of the Asteroid Belt began in 1800 due to an issue with the then-known model of the Solar System. According to the Titius-Bode Law, which accurately predicted the orbits of the planets, there was an unexplained gap between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter. To resolve this, the United Astronomical Society began observing this gap in the hopes of finding something.
The group included many famed astronomers, like William Herschel, who had discovered Uranus and its moons in the 1780s. Giuseppe Piazzi, the chair of astronomy at the University of Palermo, had been asked to join the Society. Ironically, he was the first to make a discovery in this region (consistent with what the Titus-Bode Law predicted) before the invitation had even arrived.
He named this object "Ceres" after the Roman god of the harvest and the patron god of Sicily. Fifteen months later, noted astronomer and Society member Heinrich Olbers discovered a second object in the same region, later named 2 Pallas. In appearance, these objects were little more than bright and moving dots.
This led Herschel to suggest they be designated as a new class of objects called "asteroids" (Greek for "star-like"). By the early 1850s, the term "asteroids" entered into common usage, as did "Asteroid Belt." Since the late 19th century, over 1 million objects have been identified in the Belt.
Located between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter, the Main Asteroid Belt is a torus-shaped region populated by bodies left over from the formation of the Solar System. It is designated as the "Main" Belt to distinguish it from asteroid populations such as Near-Earth Asteroids (NEAS) and the Trojan and Greek asteroids (which share an orbit with Jupiter).
At present, astronomers have cataloged a total of 1,113,527 objects in the Belt, with estimates indicating that there may be as many as 1.9 million objects measuring 0.6 mi (1 km) or more in diameter. The Belt ranges in distance from 2.2 to 3.2 astronomical units* (AU) from the Sun and is about one AU wide.
Its total mass is estimated at 5.271021 lbs (2.391021 kg), equivalent to about 3% of the Moon's mass. More than 200 asteroids are larger than 100 km in diameter, including Ceres, 4 Vesta, 2 Pallas, 10 Hygiea, and others. These four asteroids account for more than half of the Belt's total mass, with more than one-third accounted for by Ceres alone.
Despite the common misperceptions, the Asteroid Belt is mostly empty space, with objects spread over a large volume of space. The main population of the Asteroid Belt is sometimes divided into three zones, which are based on what is known as Kirkwood Gaps.
These describe the dimensions of an asteroid's orbit based on its semi-major axis and are named after astronomer Daniel Kirkwood. He first discovered gaps in the distance of asteroids in 1866. These describe the dimensions of an asteroids orbit, based on its semi-major axis. Within this scheme, there are three zones:
The Asteroid Belt may also be divided into the inner and outer belts. The inner Belt consists of asteroids that orbit nearer to Mars than the 3:1 Kirkwood gap (2.5AU). The outer Belt consists of asteroids closer to Jupiter's orbit. The asteroids that orbit with a radius of 2.06AU from the Sun can be considered the inner boundary of the asteroid belt.
The temperature of the Asteroid Belt varies with the distance from the Sun. For dust particles within the Belt, typical temperatures range from -99 F (-73C) at 2.2AU down to -162 F (-108C) at 3.2AU. However, due to rotation, the surface temperature of an asteroid can vary considerably as the sides are alternately exposed to solar radiation and then to the stellar background.
Like the terrestrial planets, most asteroids are composed of silicate rock, while a small portion contains iron and nickel. The remaining asteroids are made up of a mix of these, along with carbon-rich materials. Some of the more distant asteroids tend to contain more ices and volatiles, including water ice. The Main Belt consists primarily of three categories of asteroids:
There are also the mysterious and relatively rare V-type (or basaltic) asteroids that were once believed to have originated from Vesta. However, the discovery of basaltic asteroids with different chemical compositions suggests a different origin, and current theories of asteroid formation predict that the V-type asteroids should be more plentiful.
*The same distance between the Earth and the Sun
As noted, the Belt is populated by millions of known objects, but more than half of its mass is claimed by four planetoids - Ceres, 4 Vesta, 2 Pallas, and 10 Hygiea. These bodies range in terms of size, shape, and have varied compositions. As a result of Resolution 5A: "Definition of 'planet'" passed during the 2006 General Assembly of the IAU, these bodies are classified as "minor planets."
Measuringabout 584 mi (940 km) in diameter, Ceres is the largest of the four bodies and is the only planetoid in the Belt (or Solar System) to be massive enough to achieve hydrostatic equilibrium (become spheroid in shape). This led to its reclassification as the only "dwarf planet" in the Belt, as part of the IAU's 2006 Resolution.
Ceres has a mass of around 20.681020 lbs (9.381020kg), roughly 1.28% as massive as the Moon, and is largely composed of water ice, carbonates, and silicate minerals. These are believed to be differentiated between a largely icy outer crust, an interior ocean of saltwater and rock, and a rocky mantle and metallic core.
While it is the most massive body in the Asteroid Belt, Ceres is believed to have formed beyond the orbit of Jupiter and migrated to the Belt. Between its low mass and density, the surface gravity is also quite low: less than 3% that of Earth (0.028 g). Its surface is covered by craters measuring between 10 and 60 mi (20 and 100 km), while the largest measures 176 mi (284 km) across - the Kerwal Basin.
The surface also shows signs of cryovolcanism, as indicated by its bright regions, which appear to be composed of water ice and silicate material. These features bolster the case for action between the surface and an interior ocean, possibly due to impacts on one side that triggered activity in the interior.
Vesta has a mean diameter of 326 mi (525 km), but the diameter varies depending on which axis. In truth, Vesta has a flattened hexagonal shape that measures 355.8 346.2 277.4 mi (572.6 557.2 446.4km). While Vesta is about one-quarter the mass of Ceres - 5.71020 lbs (2.591020kg) - its mean density is higher, resulting in similar surface gravity of around 2.5% (0.025g).
Compared to Ceres, Vesta is believed to have formed in the Asteroid Belt, due to its silicate and metallic composition. These are differentiated between a metallic core of iron and nickel measuring 133-140 mi (214-226 km) and a rocky olivine mantle and surface crust. The surface is also covered in regolith (silicate dust), indicating "space weathering."
At roughly 318 mi (513 km) in diameter and with amass of roughly 4.41020 lbs (21020kg), Pallas is slightly smaller and less massive than Vesta. Based on spectroscopic observations, Pallas' surface is composed of silicate minerals containing trace amounts of water ice, and iron. Its surface gravity is comparable to Ceres and Vesta, at around 2.2% of Earth-normal gravity (0.022g).
Hygeia has a mean diameter of around 269 mi (434 km) and a mass of around 1.921020 lbs (8.751019 kg). Like Pallas, it has a roughly spheroid shape but is not massive enough to have achieved hydrostatic equilibrium. Based on spectroscopic observations, the surface appears to be composed primarily of carbonaceous materials similar to those found in C-type meteorites, with evidence of past water ice.
To put it simply, the Asteroid Belt is not a friendly environment. Even the largest asteroids are airless, which means that everything in the Belt is exposed to the vacuum of space. Its distance from the Sun places it firmly in the "Frost Line," where conditions are consistentlycold enough for volatile compounds such as water, ammonia, methane, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide to condense into solid ice grains.
For dust particles and larger bodies in the Belt, surface temperatures are also very extreme, typically ranging from -99 F (-73 C) at 2.2 AU down to -162 F (-108 C) at 3.2 AU. However, due to rotation, the surface temperature of an asteroid can vary considerably as the sides are alternately exposed to solar radiation and the darkness of space.
Radiation exposure is also a major hazard due to the lack of atmospheres or planetary magnetic fields. This includes solar radiation, which becomes far more intense during solar flare activity, and galactic cosmic rays (GCRs). It is estimated that human settlers would need to burrow at least 328 ft (100 meters) beneath the surface to ensure protection.
Much like the Moon and other airless bodies, bodies in the Asteroid Belt also have significant amounts of regolith. This means that any settlements on or within asteroids will have a "dust problem," where tiny shards of silica will pose hazards for respiratory health, stick to everything, and mess with machinery and electronics. And as always, there is the issue of low gravity.
On all the major bodies in the Belt, the gravitational force is between 2 and 3% of what we experience here on Earth. Everywhere else, the conditions are what is known as "microgravity," similar to what astronauts are exposed to aboard the ISS. According to studies performed on the ISS, the long-term effects include muscle and bone density loss and effects on cardiovascular health and organ function.
Another major issue is the distance between the Main Belt and Earth. As with Mars, the distance to the Belt's minor planets varies considerably as they orbit the Sun. For example, between April 2021 and December 2021, the distance between Ceres and Earth ranged from a maximum of 3.9 AU to a minimum of 1.76 AU. Between July 2022 and March 2023, it will range from 3.6 AU to 1.6 AU.
In short, the range between Ceres and Earth more than doubles during a seven to eight-month period. This means that missions to and from the Belt could only launch during certain windows. While this is more convenient than the 26-month launch window with Mars, the distances are about four times greater - 0.374 AU to 1.67 AU.
For long-term habitation in the Asteroid Belt to become a reality, the settlements will need to be as self-sufficient as possible. But with the right work, the Main Belt could become the mining and manufacturing hub of the Solar System.
Establishing self-sustaining habitats in the Belt requires leveraging local resources to meet the needs of the inhabitants - a process known as In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU). This includes harvesting local water ice to create oxygen gas, propellant, and drinking water; and mining regolith and minerals to create manufacturing materials.
Luckily, the Asteroid Belt has abundant resources, depending on the class involved. C-type carbonaceous asteroids, which account for 75% of the Main Belt, and are believed to have abundant water ice. Several mission proposals have been drafted to harness this abundant resource and use it to advance exploration and settlements efforts in the Main Belt.
Similarly, the settlers will need to engineer bioregenerative life support systems to ensure sustainable living conditions. This would require creating self-sustaining biomes within the habitats that conform to a Terraform Sustainability Assessment Framework (TSAF), which comes down to creating living systems that mimic Earth's.
A good example is a proposal for a "megasatellite settlement" consisting of rotating habitats (Stanford Toruses) in orbit around Ceres. This concept was proposed by theoretical physicist Dr. Pekka Janhunen, a research manager with theFinnish Meteorological Institute and a senior technical advisor Aurora Propulsion Technologies.
As Dr. Janhunen described it, the settlement would bring terraforming to the Belt in the sense of "creating an artificial environment, near Ceres and of Ceres materials, that can scale up to the same and a larger population than Earth has today." The design calls for habitats that rotate to simulate gravity attached to a disk-shaped frame through passive magnetic bearings.
Using local resources, an Earth-like atmosphere could be created within these habitats. This would consist of using nitrogen, water ice, and frozen carbon dioxide from Ceres to create nitrogen gas (as a buffer), oxygen gas, and trace amounts of frozen volatiles. This could be pumped into the habitats to create a sustained atmospheric pressure of 101.325kPa, consisting of 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, and trace amounts of CO2 and other gases.
Locally-sourced regolith could then be imported and combined with organic molecules to fashion "soil." These would include the high amounts of organic carbon, phosphorus, and other chemicals that are key fertilizer ingredients. The introduction of plants, over time, would enrichen the soil and remove heavy metals, allowing for crops to be grown.
Trees and grasses would be introduced to stabilize the soil and create a water cycle for the habitat. Different habitats could host different types of biomes (grassland, desert, jungle, alpine, etc.) that are interconnected to ensure that the habitat is as "Earth-like" as possible - thereby fulfilling the "terraforming" aspect of the Asteroid settlements.
Similar habitats could be built near Vesta, Pallas, Hygeia, and any other large bodies rich in natural resources. From these habitats, regular missions could be mounted to mine asteroids for their mineral wealth, which could be shipped back to Earth, other planets, or other habitats in space or manufactured into goods on-site.
In his book, Entering Space, famed science communicator and space exploration advocate Robert Zubrin wrote:
"The asteroid belt is known to contain vast supplies of very high-grade metal ore in a low gravity environment that makes it comparatively easy to explore to Earth... These asteroids collectively represent enormous economic potential... For mining purposes, the real action is going to be in the Main Belt, where millions of 1-km class ($150 billion worth of [platinum] class!) objects undoubtedly reside."
The monetary values used by Zubrin here come from the 1987 book Space Resources:Breaking the Bonds of Earth, co-authored by cosmochemist Prof. John Lewis (Univ. of Arizona) and his wife, Ruth Lewis. For example, the pair considered a single S-type asteroid with very little water but abundant metals like nickel, cobalt, and precious metals like gold, platinum, and rhodium.
According to Lewis and Lewis, a small S-type asteroid measuring 0.6 mi (1 km) in diameter would have a mass of about 2.2 billion tons (2 billion tonnes). Of this, they estimate that the following amounts of precious and "strategic" metals would be available:
Based on the market value of palladium metals alone in 1987, Lewis and Lewis calculated that this asteroid would have a dollar value of $150 billion ($371 billion with inflation). When you factor in the current market value(at the time of writing) of the other metals - iron ($27.1 billion), nickel ($745 billion), and cobalt ($1.11 trillion) - the total value of one run-of-the-mill S-type asteroid reached $2.253 trillion - over 10% of annual GDP in the U.S.
Another estimate takes a look at small S-type asteroids - measuring just ~33 ft (10 m) in diameter. An asteroid this size could contain about 1.433 million lbs (650,000kg) of metal, 110 lb (50kg) of which would be precious metals like platinum and gold. Rare, M-type asteroids contain even more metals, mostly iron-nickel, and significant amounts of rare and precious metals.
The largest of these is 16 Psyche, one of the most massive asteroids in the Solar System that is believed to be the iron core remnant of a protoplanet that lost its silicate outer layers (possibly during a collision with another protoplanet). Current estimates place this body's diameter at 157 mi (253 km) and its mass at 51019 lbs (2.2871019kg).
In terms of composition, Psyche is believed to be largely made up of metallic iron, nickel, and gold, with residual silicate minerals. Scientists will know more about its composition when NASA's Psyche mission arrives at the asteroid in early 2026. Nevertheless, current estimates place the value of the asteroid's metals at as high as $10,000 quadrillion.
To give you some perspective, the annual GDP of the entire planet was estimated at $87 trillion, based on 2019 figures. If the asteroid could be towed to Earth tomorrow and its minerals harvested rapidly, the entire market for metals would collapse. The sheer abundance of all the metals it contains would make metals worthless.
However, if Psyche and other metal asteroids could be harvested gradually, they would become a welcome addition to our planet's economy. As for how these minerals would be mined, NASA explored many ideas in two publications: "A Review of Extra-Terrestrial Mining Robot Concepts" (2012) and "Robotic Asteroid Prospector" (RAP) (2013).
In these reports, NASA reviewed concepts proposed in the previous forty years (both crewed and uncrewed) and explored the four aspects of the process - prospecting, mining/retrieval, processing, and transportation. Ultimately, they determined that the challenge would be best handled by robotic machines working in collaboration with human explorers.
"Humans will benefit from the resources that will be mined by robots," it says. "They will visit outposts and mining camps as required for exploration, commerce, and scientific research, but a continuous presence is most likely to be provided by robotic mining machines that are remotely controlled by humans."
They also advised that any attempts to conduct mining missions be preceded by extensive prospecting using space-based telescopes, the creation of infrastructure in space, the construction and maintenance of the robotic spacecraft in space, and the creation of processing facilities where ore could be shipped to.
With little effort, one can imagine what asteroid mining would look like. The mining vessels will be built on a series of "space platforms" located in the Belt. These vessels will be automated and likely controlled by a central AI or "swarm intelligence." The process of prospecting, mining, processing, and shipping will be overseen by human workers in the Belt, operating out of facilities close to their habitats.
Processing will also take place on a series of "foundry" platforms, where the ores are turned into purified metals and maybe even finished products. Shipping vessels will then send these products to Earth, Mars, the Moon, and anywhere else they are in demand. Similar efforts will mine for water ice and organics used by the local settlements, with some being exported as well.
Power will likely be provided by a combination of solar arrays, kilo power nuclear arrays, mini-reactors, and possibly fusion reactors (which could be fueled using Helium-3 mined on the Moon). In time, a thriving economy could be created based on extracting water ice, volatiles, chemicals, and minerals from the asteroids.
This economy could draw settlers from Earth and elsewhere, eventually leading to many habitats throughout the Main Belt. Additional industries, such as tourism and recreation, would spring up in time, and a human foothold in the Main Belt would facilitate missions farther out. This includes Jupiter and its system of moons, Saturn and its largest satellites, and beyond.
Beyond the questions of how and when humans could settle in the Main Asteroid Belt, there's the inevitable question "why"? Why should humans establish a foothold in this region of space? There must be another source of motivation beyond the prospect of wealth and resources, surely? One of the more obvious ones is survival, both for human civilization and Earth.
In 2006, then-NASA administrator Michael Griffin stated the importance of space colonization during an interview with the Washington Post:
"The goal isn't just scientific exploration. It's also about extending the range of human habitat out from Earth into the solar system as we go forward in time. In the long run, a single-planet species will not survive. If we humans want to survive for hundreds of thousands or millions of years, we must ultimately populate other planets."
Indeed, the ability to harness the resources of the Solar System and shift the burden of mining and manufacturing away from Earth could very well help us avert climate catastrophe in this century. And as noted public figures like Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk have stated, becoming "multi-planetary" may be the only way to ensure that human civilization won't be wiped out in a single cataclysmic event.
There's also the prospect of growth and diversification. Once again, Zubrin explored this idea in Entering Space, where he claimed one of the most appealing reasons for settling the Asteroid Belt was the social diversity and experimentation it would allow for:
"This will make available thousands of potential new worlds, whose cultures and systems of law need never fuse. Perhaps some will be republican, others anarchist. Some communalist, others capitalist. Some patriarchal, others matriarchal. Some aristocratic, others egalitarian. Some religious, others rationalist. Some Epicuricans, others puritanical. Some traditional, others novel.
"For a long time to come, groups and human beings who think they have found a better way will have places to go where they can give it a try... The rest of humanity will watch and learn from their experiences. That which works will be repeated. So shall we continue to progress"
But perhaps the most compelling reason is the challenge that it represents. The drive to explore, set down in new places, and build a new life is a recurring theme in human history. When it comes to the Asteroid Belt or space in general, there's also the prospect of doing it right this time - without slavery, genocide, and imperialism, like the previous period of colonization and "discovery."
While living in the Asteroid Belt can only come after similar experiments are conducted closer to home - Low Earth Orbit (LEO), the Moon, and Mars - the benefits of settling the Main Belt are clear. Lots of places to settle, abundant resources, a thriving local economy, and a stepping stone to the outer Solar System. Someday, the term "Belters" could be a reference to something real.
"Here in the Belt, we don't believe in 'good-byes.' For us, it's always, 'until we meet again!' For those who live and thrive here, the movement of people and ships is a constant, and we're forever growing and mixing. We hope you take that same spirit with you as you return to Earth, Mars, Luna, and other destinations!
"In the meantime, we hope you enjoy your stay aboard Piazzi, Olbers, Mande, or whatever port-of-call you are destined to before returning home. We remind our passengers that transitioning from low-g to regular gravity can be challenging. Please report to one of the many clinical facilities, or call for assistance, if you are experiencing difficulty walking and standing or are experiencing unusual swelling or pain.
"We would also like to remind our passengers that they will be required to undergo bioscans upon arrival and that the prohibition against taking from the local biome remains in effect. There is much to enjoy aboard our stations, but we ask that you leave it there.
"From all of us here at Ceres and the Main Asteroid Belt, we say: thank you all, and 'until we meet again!'"
See the rest here:
The science of becoming "interplanetary": Could humans live in the asteroid belt? - Interesting Engineering
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on The science of becoming "interplanetary": Could humans live in the asteroid belt? – Interesting Engineering
The Art of Twitter War: How Ukraine is using social media to win support against Russia – Firstpost
Posted: at 10:50 pm
While Ukraines allied forces are meeting Russias advancing troops in the on-ground and air battle, Ukrainian ministers as well as president Volodymyr Zelenskyy have opened a new front in the fight using technology to rally forces and international support in the countrys favour.
A man sporting a ribbon in Ukrainian flag colours uses a smartphone. AFP
While Ukraines allied forces are meeting Russias advancing troops in the on-ground and air battle, Ukrainian ministers as well as President Volodymyr Zelenskyy have opened a new front in the fight by using technology to rally forces and international support.
Since the beginning of the armed conflict on 24 February when Russia launched a special military operation on Ukraine, Zelenskyy has kept the world updated about what was happening and to relay messages of strength to the Ukrainian people.
Lets take a look at how the Ukrainian administration is fighting the battle on the digital front:
The continuous online presence of the Ukrainian president through social media and digital press conferences is in stark contrast with his Russian counterpart, who has mostly remained quiet or has appeared in pictureslooking solemn.
Also read: Nothing funny about it: Braving Russian invasion, a president who was once a comedian
On 24 February Zelenskyy took to Twitter to inform the world about Russias treacherous attack and compared it to Nazi Germany in World War II.
The following days he continued tweeting about his conversations with allies and how they have extended support.
When Russian forces reached the outskirts of the capital city of Kyiv, Zelenskyy posted a video on Twitter.
"I am here. We will not lay down any weapons. We will defend our state, because our weapons are our truth. Our truth is that this is our land, our country, our children and we will protect all of this," the 44-year-old said in the video, news agency AFP reported.
After initial hesitation from the US and European Union in sending help towards defending Kyiv, it was a breakthrough moment on 26 February as Zelenskyy tweeted, "The anti-war coalition is working!
Almost on an hourly basis, Zelenskyy has updated about the situation and addressed world leaders, thanked them for their support to Ukraine through his Twitter handle.
He also thanked Prime Minister Narendra Modi for support to Ukrainian people.
Not just Zelenskyy but a member of his cabinet, minister of digital transformation of Ukraine Mykhailo Fedorov, has also been actively engaged with people on social media.
According to a report by BBC, Ukraines youngest cabinet member has been waging a digital war against Russia from an underground shelter in a secret location in Kyiv.
On 26 February, as Russian assault disrupted internet services in parts of the country, Fedorov called out to SpaceX founder Elon Musk, asking him to provide Starlink stations to the nations.
Musk readily responded by activating Starlink service in Ukraine.
Also read: How does Elon Musk's Starlink help Ukraine: All you need to know about it
Over the last 13 days since Russia invaded Ukraine, Fedorov has continued to mount pressure on multinational companies to boycott Russia. Many have responded in kind, including Apple, Microsoft, Meta, YouTube, Sony and Oracle.
Ukraines official Twitter account also upped its game after Russia launched an attack on the country by tweeting a caricature of Russian president Vladimir Putin with Hitler.
And when media outlets termed it as a meme, the people behind the Twitter handle had a ready response too.
The Twitter handle has continued to mock the Russian administration with its posts.
With inputs from agencies
Read all the Latest News, Trending News,Cricket News, Bollywood News,India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
Read the original:
The Art of Twitter War: How Ukraine is using social media to win support against Russia - Firstpost
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on The Art of Twitter War: How Ukraine is using social media to win support against Russia – Firstpost
5 big takeaways from the Outlander Season 6, Episode 2 promo and synopsis – Claire and Jamie
Posted: at 10:50 pm
Jamie and Young Ian cant agree on dealing with the Cherokee in Outlander Season 6, Episode 2. Heres what to expect in the episode.
Now that Jamie has become an Indian Agent, its time to form bonds with the local Cherokee people. Jamie already has some good relations with them anyway, but he needs to strengthen them.
Meanwhile, its time for Baby Fraser to make its arrival. Marsali is going into labor, but this is not going to be the easy birth that Felicite seemed to be. Where is Fergus this time?
The promo and synopsis for Outlander Season 6, Episode 2 give us some idea of what to expect. Heres a breakdown of big storylines.
Heres a look at the promo and synopsis for the episode first. Then well get into our breakdown of everything.
Ian and Jamie butt heads over Jamies reluctance to pass along the Cherokees request for guns. The tension between Fergus and Marsali dissipates as Marsali gives birth to their fourth child. However, the joy is short-lived when a discovery is made.
Jamie is worried about what the Cherokee want
As Jamie goes to see Bird, he learns what Bird wants to gain from this alliance. Its more than just normal trade. He wants guns.
With tensions brewing in the colonies, this request is only natural. However, its not a comfortable request. Could Jamie be arming people who become enemies to the Crown? Thats certainly going to be something that he worries about.
Young Ian wants to help the Cherokee
I love that Young Ian is going to get more focus in Outlander Season 6. It looks like Episode 2 is the start of that. Well see him unhappy that Jamie doesnt really want to arm the Cherokee.
Young Ian knows about time travel. He knows a war is coming, and hes going to ask the time travelers what happens. With the time he spent with the Mohawk, of course he has some allegiance to all Native American tribes. He wants to make sure theyre protected.
Fergus continues to be a concern
When Marsali goes into labor in the promo for Outlander Season 6, Episode 2, Jamie has just one concern. Where is Fergus?
It seems that Fergus is missing a lot more than hes not. Who will have to go out to find him? Whats Fergus going to be like when someone does find him? Will we get that labor scene from A Breath of Snow and Ashes?
Theres a problem with the baby
Claire notes that theres a complication with labor. The baby hasnt moved for hours, she tells Jamie. Even at this point of labor, the baby should still be moving.
Marsali also knows that something is wrong. Yes, pregnancies and labors are all different, but shell know if something doesnt feel right. Claire will listen to her, too. Will this baby be okay? Is something going to happen to Marsali?
Tom wants the surgery after all
Claire offered to treat Toms curling hand. He didnt want the surgery at first, but that changes in Outlander Season 6, Episode 2.
It looks like Claire is going to turn to Malva for some help. Malva is keen to learn about healing, even if the men in her family dont like it. Allen may foreshadow something in his comment about female healers being viewed as witches.
What do you hope to see in Outlander Season 6, Episode 2? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Watch Outlander with a FREE 7-day trial of Amazon Channels!
Read more:
5 big takeaways from the Outlander Season 6, Episode 2 promo and synopsis - Claire and Jamie
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on 5 big takeaways from the Outlander Season 6, Episode 2 promo and synopsis – Claire and Jamie
7 futuristic space technologies that NASA is exploring – The Next Web
Posted: at 10:50 pm
If youre impressed by Martian rovers and helicopters, wait till you see whats on the horizon.
NASA has unveiled a range of visionary tech that could be used in future space missions.
The projects are the latest members of the Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) program, which funds early-stage studies to evaluate their potential.
The new cohort joins an array of innovations that were already in the program.
Heres our pick of the most intriguing ideas.
Project RAMA has proposed a scalable way of exploring the solar system: converting entire asteroids into enormous autonomous spacecraft.
The team plans to use robotic processes to turn asteroid elements into programmed automata.
The idea is to cut the costs of ground launches by manufacturing the tech in outer space.
Shapeshifting is typically found in science fiction, but NASAs betting it could work in space.
The agency has funded a flying amphibious robot that mutates into different devices.
DubbedShapeshifter, the system is comprised of smaller units that collectively morph into robotic balls, flight arrays, and torpedo-like swimmers.
The proposal envisions the machine globetrotting from Titans rugged cliffs to its deep seafloors.
NASA may have found a useful tool for astronomers: a giant shade in space that blocks the glare from stars.
The 100-meter starshade would match the position and velocity of a moving telescope. It could then cast a dark shadow over the meddling star without blocking the light of its planets.
The idea reminds me of Mr Burns building a giant parasol to increase energy demand but the creators say its merely a powerful exoplanet observatory.
NASA has well-documented issues with spacesuits. The current crop is old, cumbersome, and ill-equipped for future missions.
The SmartSuit is an attempt to upgrade these outfits. The spacesuit incorporates soft robotics, stretchable self-healing skin, and integrated sensors that collect and display data to the wearer.
The kits designed specifically for human missions to Mars.
Space trash is becoming a major danger. There are approximately 100 million pieces of extraterrestrial debris that are at least 1-millimeter big. Spacecraft travel at such speeds that even tiny paint flecks can cause damage.
The Brane Craft is a wafer-thin attempt to clean up this trash. The device wraps around orbiting debris and then lowers it to burn up in Earths atmosphere.
The craft is half the thickness of a human hair and looks like a sheet of paper. The creators compare it to an automated spot cleaner in space.
If Elon Musks dream of colonizing the red planet is to become a reality, he will (hopefully) want to make the Martian air breathable.
Ivan Ermanoski, a research professor at Arizona State University, has a proposal that could help: a portable oxygen generator.
The system uses a process called thermal swing sorption/desorption (TSSD) to generate oxygen from the Martian atmosphere. Ermanoski says it uses 10x less energy than the leading current methods.
The concept could be a step towards humans breathing on Mars.
The last proposal on our list involves a technique called Optical Mining.
The project uses concentrated sunlight to turn asteroid materials into rocket propellants. This would then supply spacecraft with affordable and accessible fuel.
NASA believes the system could ultimately help industrialize space.
These devices may never see the light of space, but just one of them could transform the cosmos as we know it.
Here is the original post:
7 futuristic space technologies that NASA is exploring - The Next Web
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on 7 futuristic space technologies that NASA is exploring – The Next Web
There’s water everywhere, even on the moon – Delaware Gazette
Posted: at 10:50 pm
In the January 2022 issue of Science Advances, Chinese scientists announced further evidence that the moon may contain water ice.
The evidence came from data collected by the Chinese Change 5 lunar lander, which touched down on the moons surface on Dec. 1, 2020. Thats good news for astronomers, who care about such seemingly arcane matters. It should be good news for the rest of us as well, as we shall see.
Water is a molecule composed of two atoms of hydrogen bonded to one atom of oxygen.
Many water-seeking spacecraft have orbited or landed on the moon. Scientists designed many of them to detect the hydrogen in water.
There is good reason to do so. Hydrogen loves to bond with oxygen, and the moon has an abundance of oxygen.
Of course, that oxygen doesnt exist in its gaseous, breathable form. The moon doesnt have an atmosphere. Instead, oxygen is bound with other elements to form oxides.
On both the moon and Earth, a common oxide is iron oxide, commonly known as rust. On Earth, another is dihydrogen oxide, commonly known as water.
Change 5s evidence is not conclusive proof for the waters lunar presence because one atom of hydrogen will also bond with one atom of oxygen, forming a group of substances called hydroxyls. Alcohols in their various forms are examples of hydroxyls.
Change 5s data may also indicate the presence of hydroxyls, cousins of water, but decidedly not water.
Humans have sent many orbiters and landers to the moon looking for water, but their tests are all designed to find hydrogen. Such is the difficulty some would say the fatal flaw of looking for water from 238,855 miles away.
So why not just bring back some rocks from the moon and subject them to detailed laboratory tests? Weve done it, and it didnt work.
Apollo 11, the first crewed lunar mission in 1969, and subsequent Apollo missions, brought back rocks that geologists on Earth analyzed for water. The Russians have done the same using robot spacecraft.
Water was consistently detected in small quantities, but the results were tainted.
Rocks from the moon have to be studied in an extreme vacuum to simulate lunar conditions. If a rock is exposed to even a whiff of earthly air, it will absorb water from it.
For that reason, all the Apollo rocks produced suspect results that geologists discarded as evidence.
Why should you care? Water is, after all, the stuff of life, an essential ingredient for its existence on our planet. Biologists say that life was born in the sea. When it moved onto dry land, it carried its water along with it.
Humans are made up mostly of water. An old Star Trek episode refers to members of our species as bags of water, and thats about right. Our skins are designed to hold the water in and keep it from spilling back into the environment from whence it came.
Finding water thus becomes critical for our eventual expansion into the cosmos. We cant carry very much water with us because its too danged heavy and bulky to tote around. If we plan to live on the moon, well have to make it from raw materials or mine it from the lunar soil.
How did the water ice get on the moon in the first place? Astronomers offer three possible explanations.
Scenario 1: Water may be the natural result of the processes that make moons and planets.
But theres a problem. The moon has no blanket of air like Earth, and it has a much lower gravitational pull than our planet. Add the heat from the sun, and water ice turns into vapor and escapes into space.
Much of the water the moon had early in its formation has by now disappeared into the inky void.
However, at the lunar north and south poles, there are places where the sun never shines. According to data gathered by the Lunar Prospector orbiter, most of the moons water is located at the lunar poles, where ice is mixed into moon dirt, called the moons regolith by astronomers.
Half a centurys worth of lunar data seems to replicate the polar findings. However, a set of Earth-based observations lead to an even more startling conclusion.
In 2020, using the Sophia telescope mounted in a Boeing 747 aircraft, astronomers saw signs of water on sunlit areas of the moon.
Scenario 2: Water came in the form of cometary bombardment.
Like all the larger objects in our solar system, the moon is subject to bombardment by comets, which contain a fair amount of water ice. Those comets are zipping along when they hit the moon. The resultant explosions reduce the comets to dust and bury their ice deep in the lunar soil.
In fact, during the period of heavy cometary bombardment four billion years ago, the moon may have had enough water to form an atmosphere and even lakes of liquid water on its surface.
The moon had recently formed from a collision with a planet-sized object and Earth. As debris from the impact coalesced into the moon, it heated to a liquid ball of rock. It was warm enough to melt the cometary. The resulting gases could have formed an atmosphere.
Astronomers like Dirk Schulze-Maku argue that such life-producing conditions could have existed for 500 million years.
Scenario 3: Change 5s Chinese scientists and other astronomers argue that the sun produces the moons hydroxyls and water.
As the sun explodes, it generates a solar wind, a constant stream of mostly hydrogen atoms that strikes every object in the solar system. The hydrogen atoms combine with the oxygen in the lunar soil.
Herein lies a problem. The solar wind also prevents oxygen from binding to elements such as iron to form oxides. Besides, where does the abundance of oxygen come from in the first place?
The answer lies in Earths powerful magnetic field, which generates a long tail called its magneto trail. Japans Kaguya lunar orbiter discovered in 2007 that the magneto trail grabs oxygen from Earths atmosphere and transports it from our planet to the moon.
But what about that pesky solar wind that tends to block the formation of oxides?
The moons oxygen binds with other elements to form oxides when Earths magneto trail partially blocks the solar wind. That condition occurs once a month around the time when we see a full moon on Earth.
Granted, were not talking about much water. Based on the 1998 Lunar Surveyor results, NASA scientists estimated 330 million tons of ice spread out over 25,000 square miles of the lunar surface.
A lake made of all the liquid would cover only four square miles and be 35 feet deep. A cubic foot of lunar dirt might yield a half-gallon of water, and thats enough to sustain a small colony with drinking water.
Based on more recent spacecraft data, the Planetary Society estimates the total as about 600 billion kilograms of water ice, enough to fill 24,000 Olympic swimming pools.
That sounds like a lot, but it makes up only .01 percent of the lunar regolith.
It isnt nearly enough to satisfy the needs of human colonization. The average human on Earth uses about 100 gallons of water a day for drinking, bathing, and eliminating waste products.
The water would have to be mined at the poles from the lunar regolith and then transported, perhaps at long distances, to lunar bases.
A lunar base would have to recycle every drop of the precious liquid, including, ahem, water excreted from the body. Lets just say that lunar colonists would be drinking the same glass of water over and over again, if you get my drift.
If lunar explorers recycled carefully, they might have enough left over to use for other purposes.
Water is, of course, made up of hydrogen and oxygen. By breaking up the water into its component elements, we can produce oxygen to breathe. Also, hydrogen and oxygen make powerful rocket fuel when recombined. Gigantic tanks filled with liquid hydrogen and oxygen fed the Space Shuttles engines.
Separating hydrogen from oxygen requires a considerable amount of energy. Therefore, any lunar base would require a small nuclear reactor or several square miles of solar panels.
Does the moon have enough water to sustain such lunar bases? To find out, NASA is scheduled to land PRIME-1 at the lunar south pole very near a crater called Shackleton.
The mission will drill deep into the lunar regolith looking for water ice.
NASA chose that particular location because a previous mission, the Lunar Reconnaissance Explorer, determined that the bottom of the Shackleton Crater, deep in shadow, may have 22 percent of its surface covered with water ice.
Eventually, lunar bases may become stopping-off points to more distant places like Mars and beyond. And that is reason enough to be excited about finding water on the moon.
Tom Burns is the former director of the Perkins Observatory in Delaware.
Continue reading here:
There's water everywhere, even on the moon - Delaware Gazette
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on There’s water everywhere, even on the moon – Delaware Gazette