Page 3,852«..1020..3,8513,8523,8533,854..3,8603,870..»

Category Archives: Transhuman News

Why Lebanon censors Frank Sinatra, Puss in Boots, and The West Wing

Posted: March 4, 2014 at 8:41 pm

BEIRUT, Lebanon At the entrance to the March Lebanon office in Beirut there is a well-stocked bookshelf. Its contents include classics like "Of Mice and Men," "The Diary of Anne Frank," "The Da Vinci Code," "Sophies Choice" and the slightly less classy "Little Book of Big Penis."

Crack the covers and youll realize this isnt any ordinary book collection. The pages are all blank. The Lebanese government has banned them. Turn it over and you might be surprised to read why. The reasons range from homosexual references and politics to religion and vague connection to things Jewish.

On an adjacent shelf sits an eclectic CD collection including Frank Sinatra (Banned: Zionist tendencies), Lady Gaga (Banned: Offensive to Christianity), The Buddha Bar Compilation (Banned: Religion) and Bad Religion (Banned: Offensive name).

March, a Lebanese NGO and the owners of this bizarre collection, have been documenting these obscure and arbitrary censorship practices in Lebanon via their Virtual Museum of Censorship since the group was founded in 2011. To describe their findings as bizarre would be an understatement.

1. "Puss in Boots" Censored Reason: Obscene and immoral. The name "Puss in Boots" was changed to "Cat in Boots" for Lebanese audiences /2. Nirvana Banned Reason: witchcraft, Satanic. While every Nirvana album has been banned in Lebanon, the Nirvana best-of collection strangely passed inspection. /3. "Nutty Professor" Seized during a security services raid on the Beirut Virgin Megastore along with numerous other movies because the films "undermined religions, contravened good morals and Israeli boycott laws, or included texts inciting young people to commit suicide". /4. "The Nanny" Banned Reason: Jewish.

The laws of censorship are so vague that it allows the people in charge to censor anything they want, said Lea Baroudi, a founding member and general coordinator of March. And what worries me is that I think it is getting worse.

Baroudi said many of the inconsistences exist because there is no centralized censorship body. Various ministries, commissions and general security can all legally ban material while religious authorities, political parties and even foreign embassies wield their influence on censorship decisions.

Criteria for censorship listed in one of March's publications seem unhelpfully broad:

- Offensive to the sensitivities of the public

Link:
Why Lebanon censors Frank Sinatra, Puss in Boots, and The West Wing

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Why Lebanon censors Frank Sinatra, Puss in Boots, and The West Wing

#indexawards2014 Advocacy Nominee: Shahzad Ahmad – Video

Posted: at 8:41 pm


#indexawards2014 Advocacy Nominee: Shahzad Ahmad
Shahzad Ahmad leads the fight against online censorship in Pakistan. He has sued the Pakistani government over their suspected use of surveillance software, ...

By: Index on Censorship

Read more:
#indexawards2014 Advocacy Nominee: Shahzad Ahmad - Video

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on #indexawards2014 Advocacy Nominee: Shahzad Ahmad – Video

USA Impending Economic Meltdown Dollar Collapse Warning Global Crisis Martial Law! – Video

Posted: at 8:41 pm


USA Impending Economic Meltdown Dollar Collapse Warning Global Crisis Martial Law!
USA Impending Economic Meltdown Dollar Collapse Warning Global Crisis Martial Law! videos.. Please click here to subscribe to my channel.. Dollar Collapse Wa...

By: Finance 2014

View original post here:
USA Impending Economic Meltdown Dollar Collapse Warning Global Crisis Martial Law! - Video

Posted in Ron Paul | Comments Off on USA Impending Economic Meltdown Dollar Collapse Warning Global Crisis Martial Law! – Video

Radio debate with Portland conservative host who didn’t vote for Ron Paul – Video

Posted: at 8:41 pm


Radio debate with Portland conservative host who didn #39;t vote for Ron Paul
Radio debate.

By: The Radio Garden

Originally posted here:
Radio debate with Portland conservative host who didn't vote for Ron Paul - Video

Posted in Ron Paul | Comments Off on Radio debate with Portland conservative host who didn’t vote for Ron Paul – Video

Ron Paul: "Hagel's 'Defense Cuts' Are Smoke & Mirrors"

Posted: at 8:41 pm

Submitted by Ron Paul via The Ron Paul Institute,

Last week Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel proposed an additional 40,000 reduction in active duty US Army personnel, down to 450,000 soldiers. As US troops are being withdrawn from the recent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, it might make sense to reduce not only the active duty military but the entire military budget. However, from the interventionists reaction to Hagels announcement you might think President Obama announced he was shutting down the Pentagon! Rep. Michael McCaul, Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, claimed that this slight reduction in personnel would hurt our military readiness. He blamed the exploding spending on welfare entitlements for the proposed military cuts, stating, "It's all being sacrificed ... on the altar of entitlements. This president cannot take on mandatory spending, so all we've done in the Congress -- and this president -- is basically cut discretionary spending." McCaul is partly right. Welfare spending is bankrupting the country. But military spending is also welfare: it is welfare for the well-connected military-industrial complex, which enriches itself manufacturing useless boondoggles like the F-35 fighter. We should never confuse legitimate defense spending which I support with military spending, which promotes interventionism overseas and actually undermines our national security. Neoconservative Senators Lindsey Graham and John McCain were also quick to criticize Hagels announcement. They said the cuts were dead on arrival in the US Senate. "We are going to kill it, not let it happen, said Graham. McCain added, "We live in an ever-increasingly dangerous world and this budget is out of touch with reality. What McCain and Graham wont admit is that much of the reason we are in an increasingly-dangerous world is that the neocons keep inviting blowback with the interventions they are constantly pushing. If we minded our own business we would live in a far less dangerous world. Nevertheless, although the neocons make a big deal about this small cut in military personnel, in reality these are not military cuts at all. These are token proposed cuts in troop levels which Congress wont allow the administration to do anyway. What Hagel proposes is not cuts, but instead a shift in spending away from personnel and toward new high-tech weapons which are favored by and profitable to the military-industrial complex. The F-35, for example, will continue in production according to Hagels plan, despite the numerous cost over-runs and design flaws. This is likely because the F-35 is built in 46 US states and nine foreign countries! That makes it particularly popular in Congress, regardless of its flaws and expense. We do need real cuts in military spending, not just moving spending around from troops to new weapons systems. But what we really need is for the president to downsize US foreign policy. Maintaining a military presence in 140 countries while continuing to stir up trouble can lead to problems when the military is downsized. So, it's our intervention that needs downsizing.

A proper foreign policy would mean a strong national defense, but a huge reduction in interventions and commitments overseas. Why are we stirring up trouble in Ukraine? In Syria? In Africa? Why are we defending South Korea and Japan when they are wealthy enough to defend themselves? A proper sized foreign policy would defend the United States instead of provoking the rest of the world.

Your rating: None Average: 4.6 (28 votes)

Continued here:
Ron Paul: "Hagel's 'Defense Cuts' Are Smoke & Mirrors"

Posted in Ron Paul | Comments Off on Ron Paul: "Hagel's 'Defense Cuts' Are Smoke & Mirrors"

David Harsanyi Social conservatives would benefit by embracing libertarianism

Posted: at 8:41 pm

These days, to even suggest the possibility that a fiscally conservative economic outlook is compatible with faith is a matter of hypocrisy.

"I am afraid that (Rep. Paul) Ryan's budget reflects the values of his favorite philosopher, Ayn Rand, rather than the gospel of Jesus Christ," the Rev. Thomas Reese of Georgetown University told The Huffington Post not so long ago. "Survival of the fittest may be OK for social Darwinists, but not for followers of the gospel of compassion and love."

Surely, you recall this Bible passage: "Then the Lord said to Moses, 'Smite the supply-sider. I will utterly blot out the memory of all who back block grants from under heaven.'"

So it's refreshing, then, to hear would-be fusionist Rand Paul point out the distinction libertarian critics will not. At Robert P. George's American Principles Project recently, Paul argued that a dose of libertarianism not only would help the GOP broaden its base but also would be philosophically compatible with socially conservative values.

"Libertarian and liberty doesn't mean libertine," he explained. Paul might have added that libertarianism isn't synonymous with "being uncharitable" or "selfishness" or "social Darwinism," either. He might have argued that libertarianism would do a lot more than just help orthodox Christians politically. It may even be the most conducive political philosophy for their thriving.

Obviously, for those who measure the nation's virtue by the size of the Department of Health and Human Services budget, Rand's proposition must seem absurd. Take Elizabeth Stoker, who believes that "Rand Paul's audacious new sham" is "a phony religious epiphany." She wrote in Salon:

"If what Paul intends to say here is that Christianity and libertarianism are amenable to one another because Christianity provides the moral compass libertarianism doesn't have ... the question is: Why would someone with such a commitment to Christianity ever commit themselves to a political philosophy without a similar commitment?"

Why? Because these are two distinct and often nonconflicting ideas. Though votes are often informed by a person's faith, for many Americans, a political philosophy isn't a religion. I'm no theological scholar, but I tend to believe that one can do good works without supporting a top marginal tax rate increase. Christians commit themselves to God, which, as far as I can tell, doesn't prohibit them from supporting a political philosophy that emphasizes free will over a state-ordained "morality." No doubt, most Christians appreciate that our collective national political decisions and their personal moral compasses will not always be synchronized. That's where the religious freedom comes into play.

Should social conservatives "commit themselves" to a political philosophy that not only strives for gay equality but also seeks to impel others to participate in these new norms despite religious objections? Should they commit to a philosophy that impels them to fund contraception coverage and abortions through either direct funding or fungible dollars? A philosophy that continues to force them to send their kids to crappy public schools that often undermine their faith-based beliefs? A philosophy that attacks parents who seek alternative means of education, such as home schooling? Or should they be more interested in wedding themselves to a political philosophy that downgrades the importance of politics in everyday life and allows citizens to work together to structure their communities without interference?

The growing state, after all, not the atheist, is religion's biggest rival. And intentionally or not, government is crowding out parts of community life that have traditionally been taken care of by civil society. It's draining resources once used by communities to implement services and take care of their own. And even more destructive, perhaps, is that government is becoming a source of moral authority for so many.

Continue reading here:
David Harsanyi Social conservatives would benefit by embracing libertarianism

Posted in Libertarianism | Comments Off on David Harsanyi Social conservatives would benefit by embracing libertarianism

Almost Human Season 1 Finale Review: The End?

Posted: at 8:40 pm

There are no cliffhangers or surprises in the Almost Human season 1 finale, yet J.H. Wymans futuristic drama continues to deliver thoroughly enjoyable, episodic adventures to the end. The question now: Is it enough to garner a season 2?

In this weeks finale, Straw Man, written by co-executive producers Alison Schapker and Graham Roland, Kennex (Karl Urban) and Dorian (Michael Ealy) stumble upon a string of murders which copy that of a serial killer Kennexs father put away. As Kennex digs further into his fathers case files, he finds out that an innocent man may have been wrongly put behind bars. Elsewhere, Dorian receives a performance evaluation one which could lead to him being decommissioned.

Chances are, unless youve been following the episodic descriptions of the series week-to-week, its highly unlikely you would have intuited that this is the season 1 finale. This unfortunate conundrum, as well as the overall absence of any actual thru story-arc, continues to weigh the series down, making it impossible for the franchise to stand on its own. Though the mysterious death of Kennexs father is, if anything, a starting point.

There is, or was, a proverbial enemy within the police precinct and Kennexs father paid the price for digging too deep. Kennex himself searches for answers and finds them, which leads to his father being exonerated for the crimes hes been accused of committing. Any of this seasons futuristic tales could have been used to serve this purpose, as Kennexs father (like girlfriend) is barely mentioned, and one could make the case that many of the series previous tales would have been better suited to do so.

The story at hand is, as always, fascinating to watch unfold, yet the conclusion is exceedingly simple and far less poignant than most of the cases weve seen along the way. Like audiences have been doing from the beginning, it now feels as if producers are finding it exceedingly difficult to explain why the series should continue on, and their haphazard attempt at presenting a tale which is directly connected to its lead actor serves to only reveal other issues.

Urbans weakness has finally been revealed: emotions. Give him a gun, badge and reason to fight the good fight and Urban can deliver a performance which turns other 8pm series into a joke. Force him to emote, however, as this finale does, and machismo sets in, preventing him from being able to realistically immerse himself in the emotions the scenes require of him.

Even so, Urban and Ealy, together, are a force to be reckoned with, and the supporting characters are able to make up for some of the heart thats missing in the series. Whether or not its enough for them to receive a second-chance season 2, so to speak, is still too early to tell.

Read more from the original source:
Almost Human Season 1 Finale Review: The End?

Posted in Post Human | Comments Off on Almost Human Season 1 Finale Review: The End?

Being Human: Rewind, Rewind

Posted: at 8:40 pm

[This is a review ofBeing HumanSeason 4 Episode 8. There will be SPOILERS.]

-

Now that we know that Being Human is coming to an end following this season, the six remaining episodes have taken on a new level of importance while this seasons previous seven must be viewed with a new perspective. Combined, these chapters mark the last creative gasps of the series and a payoff for fans who have shown fidelity through Being Humans four seasons.

Sallys use of magic, first Donnas and then her own, has been turning into a funnel cloud since last season. Despite her big heart, Sally is reckless and dangerous and that finally seemed to really sink in, not because someone laid it out for her as Donna previously has but because she saw that by striving for better, she made everything so much worse because she is an unnatural thing.

Before that revelation, though, we are treated to a few interesting new realities as Sally jumps into her past self (and gets stuck there), fights back against Danny, and quickly meddles with the order of things. A calamitous decision that is born from Sallys big-hearted intervention into Aidans backslide and his eventual, and regrettable, nosh on the red-headed nurse from the pilot episode; something that leads to Sally tell Aidan about their shared future.

To Aidan (played with wonderful vulnerability by Sam Witwer in this episode), who is struggling to embrace his human side (his characters stated and occasionally abandoned flight plan throughout the shows run), Sallys boasts seem to give hope. Aidan is looking up from a dark wells bottom at the start of Being Human and Sally is telling him that he will see the light again. That faith is enough to push Aidan into bringing Josh into the fold, nearly re-creating the living arrangement at the heart of the show, save for Sallys beating heart, which breaks when it turns out that Danny is fated to be a killer, taking out his aggression on Sallys friend Bridget.

That Sally doesnt do more to avenge Bridgets death is shocking, but she is pre-occupied by her now romantic relationship with Aidan. This version of the timeline is all about Sallys reward as Meaghan Raths character almost drunkenly flits about, changing things because she can. To Sally, she can have her cake and eat it too Aidan for her and Nora for Josh but when things break bad costing Josh the destiny with Nora that Sally teases, he begins to slowly question whether her presence and her blueprint for their lives is a positive force.

Link:
Being Human: Rewind, Rewind

Posted in Post Human | Comments Off on Being Human: Rewind, Rewind

Human Centipede 3 First Look

Posted: at 8:40 pm

Heres a cheery image: the first pic from Tom Sixs third film in the Human Centipede series: Human Centipede 3 (Final Sequence])The shock here may be that the image doesnt even feature a hint of humans sewn together end-to-end. And while the jail setting doesnt look all that inviting, its a lot better than pretty much anything seen in the second film.

As you can see from the shot, the star of the original film, Dieter Laser, returns for this one, and Laurence R. Harvey, star of the second, is on board as well. The full shot is below.

Heres the image:

Six talked to EWand explained,

THC Part 3 will be totally different from Parts 1 and 2 and certainly not as gross.But it will be the most controversial one politically-wise. It will have a lot of self-mockery and will be the most darkly comical of the three. Parts 1 and 2 have a very European feel. Part 3 is very American with the highest budget, a big movie score, widescreen, and an XXL human centipede. Its set in an American maximum security prison in the middle of the desert. Plot-wise I wont share details yet but if you let your imagination run wild you might get ideas.

Six also explained that the role played byEric Roberts is an ahole governor, and that this film, the directors first shot in the US, will hopefully be the first in a string of American productions.

The director also proclaimed that, yes, this film will feature the longest centipede of the series, with 500 unfortunate people included. And it was all practical, and probably a giant pain in the, er, ass to do. The chain was achieved, he says,by having a lot of brave American extras and doing it the megalomanic way like they did inSpartacus. F CGI-created things.

Huh. Dont remember a human centipede in Spartacus. Maybe Ill have to watch that again.

Link:
Human Centipede 3 First Look

Posted in Post Human | Comments Off on Human Centipede 3 First Look

Anthony Mackie Talks The Falcon & Defends Human Torch Casting

Posted: at 8:40 pm

Not everyone is totally thrilled with the casting of Michael B. Jordan (Chronicle) as Johnny Storm AKA the Human Torch in Twentieth Century Foxs upcoming Fantastic Four reboot, but Jordan himself doesnt seem too bothered by the backlash. When ambushed by reporters on his way into a club and asked for his thoughts on the matter, Jordan just smiled and responded, Theyre still going to go see it anyway. Hes definitely got the attitude down already.

Canonically speaking, the Marvel movies all take place in alternate universes and therefore any changes between the page and the screen are explained in the same way as the differences between, for example, Earth-616 and the Ultimates universe. Comic books have a long history of playing with continuity and retconning characters, so if anything this is in keeping with the traditions of the medium. As the first comic book ever published under Marvels name, Fantastic Four debuted three years before the Civil Rights Act was passed and as such the team members were white more or less by default. Now that more fifty years have passed, the idea of a black Human Torch should theoretically be a lot less controversial.

Weve already covered the reason why the decision to cast Jordan as the Human Torch makes sense from a business standpoint, and Captain America: The Winter Soldier star Anthony Mackie has also spoken out in defense of the casting. (For those unfamiliar, in the Cap sequel Mackie plays Sam Wilson AKA Falcon, an agent of S.H.I.E.L.D. who is equipped with a pair of mechanical wings.)

In an interview with ComicBook.com Mackie admits that he was never into comic books as a kid (he preferred baseball), and that while he was emotional and overjoyed to be offered a role in the Marvel franchise, he finds the fans insistence on movies being identical to the source material a little baffling:

Its crazy how much they know, and if you deter from that, its like Well, thats not authentic. You know its not real. Its made-up, so we can change it. No, no, thats not right. No, hes real. Alright.

The distinction between real people and comic book characters is an important one, though you wouldnt think so by the number of comic book fans who insist that Michael B. Jordan playing Johnny Storm is analogous to a white actor playing Martin Luther King. When asked for his opinion on Jordans casting and the subsequent backlash, Mackie first confirmed that Jordan is definitely locked for the role, and then explained that an adaptation of such a fantastical story should be open to creative freedom on the part of the filmmaker.

Michael B. Jordan is a very good friend of mine. Ive known him since he was a teenager, and Im so happy, for more than anybody else for him to be getting the accolades hes getting, because he deserves it I think with these type of movies, everything else aside, you need a good actor. Michael B. Jordan is a good actor, black or white. So what you have to realize is, and go back and forth and just say, Superman cant fly, Batman aint real, the Human Torch dont really set himself on fire and fly around the room, so he can look like whatever they want him to look like. You just have to allow yourself to see him that way. And if you cant do that, that says something about you.

Fantastic Four co-creator Stan Lee has previously commented on the issue of characters having a different race in the movie versions. When Donald Glovers fans were lobbying for him to be cast as the next Spider-Man, Lee said in an interview with MTV:

Follow this link:
Anthony Mackie Talks The Falcon & Defends Human Torch Casting

Posted in Post Human | Comments Off on Anthony Mackie Talks The Falcon & Defends Human Torch Casting

Page 3,852«..1020..3,8513,8523,8533,854..3,8603,870..»