Category Archives: Transhuman News

Sri Lanka's Permanent Representative to the UN in Geneva and Leader of the Sri Lanka delegation to the Human Rights Committee Ambassador Ravinatha Aryasinha asked the Human Rights Committee to "judge Sri Lanka in proportion to the challenges Sri Lanka has continued to face as a country emerging from a 30 year terrorist conflict". Aryasinha made this observation responding to comments made during the consideration of Sri Lanka's 5th Periodic Report under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) by the Human Rights Committee held on October 7-8, 2014 in Geneva.

The Human Rights Committee comprises a body of independent experts from 18 countries that monitors implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights by its State parties.

Responding to a question raised by the Committee as to why the PTA is still in existence in Sri Lanka, Aryasinha said Sri Lanka does not shy away from making considered choices and is adept at differentiating, in the best interest of its people.

He recalled that notwithstanding security concerns, the government had speedily resettled almost all internally displaced persons, that out of approximately 12,000 LTTE ex-combatants who have been reintegrated into society, all but 114 are undergoing rehabilitation, and 84 are under legal proceedings, and that in 2011 the government had allowed emergency to lapse, which at the time many felt was too hasty. In spite of concerns raised, the Government of Sri Lanka had taken these calculated risks.

He said, the government had to keep the PTA in effect, albeit reluctantly, due to recent incidents pointing to attempts at the resurgence of terrorism in Sri Lanka with involvement of external networks. He pointed out that such caution was also taken by many governments who have had to face the threat of terrorism.

In his opening statement, Aryasinha welcomed the opportunity to interact with the Human Rights Committee, and through it to continue the constructive engagement Sri Lanka has maintained with the processes of the UN human rights mechanisms.

Tracing the dramatic transformation that had taken place in Sri Lanka since the country last presented its report to the Human Rights Committee in 2003, Aryasinha also referred to an observation made by the Committee's Chair Sir Nigel Rodley, at the opening of the current session of the Human Rights Committee, that "what was happening in Syria and Iraq with respect to a group that was pursuing policies that were simply the antithesis of universal values and human rights standards," and a "brazen challenge to the international community".

He reminded the Committee that Sri Lanka also overcame a similar brazen challenge, when in 2009 it defeated the ruthless terror of the LTTE, a group that also claimed a mono-ethnic state glorifying murder. He said that "it is fortunate that on what is happening today,the international community is taking note, coming together to meet the threat and is exercising remedies for it. He recalled that "however for us in Sri Lanka, while terrorism began in the early 1980s, it was not until 1992 when Shri Rajiv Gandhi, the former Prime Minister of India was killed that the world started recognising the ruthlessness of the LTTE. It was not until 1996 when the US banned the LTTE that the Western world recognised our problem. And it was only after 2001 following 9/11 that actually this question got any real attention".

Aryasinha said Sri Lanka views the promotion and protection of human rights not as an end in itself but as an indispensable component of peace building and reconciliation following a three decade long conflict against separatist terrorism. In a country where no one was spared the horrors of terrorism, the government of Sri Lanka has succeeded in restoring to the entirety of Sri Lanka's population the most important right - the right to life. He said the Committee should look at the ensuing developments relating to civil and political rights in Sri Lanka in this context. The Government has taken measures to ensure sustainable peace and reconciliation and rapid development in the country, as it is an important step to ensure the full enjoyment of civil and political rights by all.

The Government delegation led by Aryasinha, comprised S.B. Divaratne, Advisor to the President and Secretary, Special Bureau of Reconciliation, Janaka Sugathadasa, Secretary, Ministry of Resettlement, Eric Illayapparachchi, Secretary, Ministry of Child Development and Women's Affairs, Nimal Kotawalagedara, Addl. Secretary, Ministry of Rehabilitation and Prison Reforms, K.D.S. Ruwanchandra, Addl. Secretary, Ministry of Law and Order, Bimba Jayasinghe Tillekeratne, PC, Senior Additional Solicitor General, Samantha Jayasuriya, Deputy Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka in Geneva, Ms. Sashikala Premawardhane, Senior Assistant Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Nerin Pulle, Deputy Solicitor General, Attorney General's Department, Mr. Sugeeshwara Gunaratna, Director, Ministry of External Affairs, Ms. Priyanga Wickramasinghe, Minister Counsellor, Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka in Geneva, Rajiv Goonetilleke, Senior State Counsel and Dilini Gunasekera, Second Secretary, Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka in Geneva.

Continue reading here:
Judge Sri Lanka in proportion to post conflict challenges

Development Cannot Succeed if it Harms Communities

(Washington, DC, October 10, 2014) Draft World Bank policies under consideration at the banks meeting on October 10-12, 2014, would dangerously roll back protection for communities affected by bank projects, independent groups said today.

Foreign ministers and central bankers are meeting in Washington, DC, to discuss key challenges in ending poverty and inequality. For human rights groups and community representatives, a critical issue is the World Banks revision of its safeguard policies, which are intended to protect people and the environment from harm. The World Bank and its member countries cannot end poverty and promote shared prosperity without protecting the rights of people affected by development investments.

While it may appear that the World Bank invests in improving human rights around the world, its current policies do not even mention this word, said Mohamed Abdel Azim of the Egyptian Center for Civil and Legislative Reform. Communities need better protection from the damages these projects can cause.

This a renewed call made in July by the Bank on Human Rights Coalition to World Bank President Jim Kim and World Bank member countries to make an explicit commitment to respect, protect, and fulfill human rights in all of the banks activities.

First of all, the World Bank should listen to the advice and expertise of local people especially women, said Moon Nay Li of the Kachin Womens Association, Thailand. We want development too but usually the benefits go somewhere else. The World Bank actually needs to have stronger protections.

The draft policy includes a highly controversial provision which would allow a government to opt-out of applying specific protections for indigenous peoples if it believes requiring the protections would raise ethnic conflict or contravene constitutional law, essentially rendering protections for indigenous peoples optional.

Indigenous peoples recommendations to strengthen World Bank standards and bring them into line with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples have fallen on deaf ears, said Joji Carino, Forest Peoples Programme director. World Bank pledges on no-dilution of existing policies are being broken with this proposed opt-out, despite advances made in other substantive areas of the new proposals.

While the World Bank announced that there would be consultations on the draft policy in locations around the world before the end of 2014, many dates and locations, even for October consultations, have not been published. Groups are demanding an extension of the consultation period and an expansion of the consultation plans to make the consultations fully accessible for all marginalized groups in borrower countries.

The World Banks first draft of the new environmental and social framework represents a hazard for the entire international development community, said Mariana Gonzalez Armijo, researcher at Fundar Centro de Anlisis e Investigacin, an independent organization in Mexico. This shift would encourage countries to accelerate investment without clear rules to protect the environment and human rights.

Read this article:
World Bank Group: Proposed Policy a Setback for Rights