Category Archives: Transhuman News

Metal Gear CENSORED - Passwords - Video Game Censorship
Did you know the PAL NES version of Metal Gear () censor the password system? In the NTSC-U/J NES versions of MG, there are more letters available to be used and this actually...

By: Censored Gaming

Here is the original post:
Metal Gear CENSORED - Passwords - Video Game Censorship - Video

President Obama on Censorship
President Obama talks about Censorship around the North Korea, Sony, The Interview. However it was not consistent with his failure to defend the film The Inn...

By: Sam Peepz

See the rest here:
President Obama on Censorship - Video

Oddworld Abe #39;s Oddysee CENSORED - Intro/Mudokon Pops - Video Game Censorship
Did you know the Japanese version of Oddworld Abe #39;s Oddysee () censor the image of the mudokon pops during the intro cutscene? In the JP version of Oddworld Abe #39;s...

By: Censored Gaming

Here is the original post:
Oddworld Abe's Oddysee CENSORED - Intro/Mudokon Pops - Video Game Censorship - Video

Pokemon Colosseum CENSORED - Rui #39;s Skirt Top - Video Game Censorship
Did you know non-Japanese versions of Pokemon Colosseum () censor Rui #39;s appearance? In the JP version of Pokemon Colosseum, she actually wears a much shorter skirt...

By: Censored Gaming

More here:
Pokemon Colosseum CENSORED - Rui's Skirt & Top - Video Game Censorship - Video

How Censorship Fails US...
Donations are greatly appreciated and help me survive to make videos: Paypal https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick hosted_button_id=DAUQG2GQSNQ4G Patreon ...

By: ThinkingApe-TV

More:
How Censorship Fails US... - Video

Governments around the world are using stealthy strategies to manipulate the media

(Red Nose Studio)

Two beliefs safely inhabit the canon of contemporary thinking about journalism. The first is that the internet is the most powerful force disrupting the news media. The second is that the internet and the communication and information tools it spawned, like YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook, are shifting power from governments to civil society and to individual bloggers, netizens, or citizen journalists.

It is hard to disagree with these two beliefs. Yet they obscure evidence that governments are having as much success as the internet in disrupting independent media and determining the information that reaches society. Moreover, in many poor countries or in those with autocratic regimes, government actions are more important than the internet in defining how information is produced and consumed, and by whom.

Illustrating this point is a curious fact: Censorship is flourishing in the information age. In theory, new technologies make it more difficult, and ultimately impossible, for governments to control the flow of information. Some have argued that the birth of the internet foreshadowed the death of censorship. In 1993, John Gilmore, an internet pioneer, told Time, The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

Governments went from spectators in the digital revolution to sophisticated early adopters of advanced technologies that allowed them to monitor journalists, and direct the flow of information.

Today, many governments are routing around the liberating effects of the internet. Like entrepreneurs, they are relying on innovation and imitation. In countries such as Hungary, Ecuador, Turkey, and Kenya, officials are mimicking autocracies like Russia, Iran, or China by redacting critical news and building state media brands. They are also creating more subtle tools to complement the blunt instruments of attacking journalists.

As a result, the internets promise of open access to independent and diverse sources of information is a reality mostly for the minority of humanity living in mature democracies.

How is this happening? As journalists, weve seen firsthand the transformative effects of the internet. It seems capable of redrafting any equation of power in which information is a variable, starting in newsrooms. But this, it turns out, is not a universal law. When we started to map examples of censorship, we were alarmed to find so many brazen cases in plain sight. But even more surprising is how much censorship is hidden. Its scope seems hard to appreciate for several reasons. First, some tools for controlling the media are masquerading as market disruptions. Second, in many places internet usage and censorship are rapidly expanding at the same time. Third, while the internet is viewed as a global phenomenon, censorship can seem a parochial or national issuein other words, isolated. Evidence suggests otherwise.

See more here:
21st-century censorship

Governments around the world are using stealthy strategies to manipulate the media

(Red Nose Studio)

Two beliefs safely inhabit the canon of contemporary thinking about journalism. The first is that the internet is the most powerful force disrupting the news media. The second is that the internet and the communication and information tools it spawned, like YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook, are shifting power from governments to civil society and to individual bloggers, netizens, or citizen journalists.

It is hard to disagree with these two beliefs. Yet they obscure evidence that governments are having as much success as the internet in disrupting independent media and determining the information that reaches society. Moreover, in many poor countries or in those with autocratic regimes, government actions are more important than the internet in defining how information is produced and consumed, and by whom.

Illustrating this point is a curious fact: Censorship is flourishing in the information age. In theory, new technologies make it more difficult, and ultimately impossible, for governments to control the flow of information. Some have argued that the birth of the internet foreshadowed the death of censorship. In 1993, John Gilmore, an internet pioneer, told Time, The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

Governments went from spectators in the digital revolution to sophisticated early adopters of advanced technologies that allowed them to monitor journalists, and direct the flow of information.

Today, many governments are routing around the liberating effects of the internet. Like entrepreneurs, they are relying on innovation and imitation. In countries such as Hungary, Ecuador, Turkey, and Kenya, officials are mimicking autocracies like Russia, Iran, or China by redacting critical news and building state media brands. They are also creating more subtle tools to complement the blunt instruments of attacking journalists.

As a result, the internets promise of open access to independent and diverse sources of information is a reality mostly for the minority of humanity living in mature democracies.

How is this happening? As journalists, weve seen firsthand the transformative effects of the internet. It seems capable of redrafting any equation of power in which information is a variable, starting in newsrooms. But this, it turns out, is not a universal law. When we started to map examples of censorship, we were alarmed to find so many brazen cases in plain sight. But even more surprising is how much censorship is hidden. Its scope seems hard to appreciate for several reasons. First, some tools for controlling the media are masquerading as market disruptions. Second, in many places internet usage and censorship are rapidly expanding at the same time. Third, while the internet is viewed as a global phenomenon, censorship can seem a parochial or national issuein other words, isolated. Evidence suggests otherwise.

Continued here:
Philip Bennett, co-author: 21st-century censorship