The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Category Archives: Transhuman News
Whoopi Goldberg, a blackface Ted Danson, and the most politically incorrect comedy routine of all time – Telegraph.co.uk
Posted: February 11, 2017 at 7:45 am
On Saturday, Whoopi Goldberg will bring her stand-up show, Whoopi Goldberg Stand Up Live! to the UK for the first time. For one night only, the Oscar winner will give the London Palladium a taste of the kind of outrageous, boundary-pushing comedy that has come to define her over a three-decade career. How outrageous? Well, in 1993, she was partially responsiblefor a comedy routine so incendiary and offensive that it threatened to topple a comedy institution, offended Americans of every race, and possibly ended her relationship.
Now 61, Goldberg, who has dabbled in activism and childrens books in recent years, launched her newest venture last year: a company that makes medical marijuana products to help ease period pains. She also continues to rack up credits on film and TV series. However, Goldberg is more often making headlines for her provocative support of controversial figures, such...
Read more here:
Whoopi Goldberg, a blackface Ted Danson, and the most politically incorrect comedy routine of all time - Telegraph.co.uk
Posted in Politically Incorrect
Comments Off on Whoopi Goldberg, a blackface Ted Danson, and the most politically incorrect comedy routine of all time – Telegraph.co.uk
Campus free speech under attack, literally – The Spokesman-Review
Posted: at 7:45 am
The following editorial is from the Orange County Register.
The violence that erupted at UC Berkeley last week during the protest of a planned speech by Breitbart News senior editor Milo Yiannopoulos, known for his conservative and decidedly politically incorrect views, was a sorry display and a blow to free speech.
It is ironic that such a demonstration took place at the birthplace of the Free Speech Movement during the 1960s. The demonstration began peacefully, with up to 1,500 protesters expressing their opposition to the conservative journalist and speaker. But then about 150 black-clad and masked agitators infiltrated the event, shooting fireworks at police, setting fires and smashing windows on campus and in the surrounding downtown area. Several apparent supporters of the event were beaten or pepper sprayed.
The provocateurs are reportedly from a group called Antifa, which claims to be an anti-fascist organization, yet remains oblivious to the fact that it adopts fascist tactics to violently suppress opposing views.
We regret that the threats and unlawful actions of a few have interfered with the exercise of First Amendment rights on a campus that is proud of its history and legacy as home of the Free Speech Movement, the university said in a statement. (W)hile Mr. Yiannopoulos views, tactics and rhetoric are profoundly contrary to our own, we are bound by the Constitution, the law, our values and the campus Principles of Community to enable free expression across the full spectrum of opinion and perspective.
If only others, particularly on left-leaning college campuses, felt the same way. Even before the violent agitators arrived on campus, for example, the peaceful protesters voiced their opposition to free speech, shouting Shut it down outside the building where Yiannopoulos was to speak and cheering when it was announced that the talk had been canceled.
Yiannopoulos remained defiant afterward. One thing we do know for sure: the left is absolutely terrified of free speech and will do literally anything to shut it down, he wrote in a Facebook post.
Such actions by progressive students to stifle nonliberal campus speakers have become a disturbing trend, however, and have only intensified since the election of President Donald Trump. There seems to be a cognitive dissonance among them of equating speech that they deem intolerant with violence, and then using actual physical threats and violence to prevent that speech.
It is a sad commentary on our supposed institutions of higher learning when diversity is idolized in every respect but the most important one the diversity of thought; when tolerance is a virtue except when it comes to the tolerance of contrary viewpoints.
The culture of too many college campuses has shifted from one of a search for knowledge and truth to indoctrination camps for immature, malleable minds and training grounds for social activism.
Published Feb. 11, 2017, midnight in: free speech, UC Berkeley, Violence
More:
Campus free speech under attack, literally - The Spokesman-Review
Posted in Politically Incorrect
Comments Off on Campus free speech under attack, literally – The Spokesman-Review
Mob censorship can’t be tolerated – DesMoinesRegister.com
Posted: at 7:44 am
Subscribe today for full access on your desktop, tablet, and mobile device.
Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about
Are we to be ruled by anarchists and have mob rule?
Try Another
Audio CAPTCHA
Image CAPTCHA
Help
CancelSend
A link has been sent to your friend's email address.
A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.
Sheldon Rabinowitz, Des Moines, Letter to the Editor 6:21 p.m. CT Feb. 10, 2017
Students from City and West High lead protesters down the pedestrian mall during a rally against President Trump's travel ban on Sunday, Feb. 5, 2017.(Photo: David Scrivner/Iowa City Press-Citizen)
If we really have free speech in this country, as provided by law, then any lawful program should be able to be held on any campus. Whether any of us, including university administration or the news media, agree with the sponsors or their subject matter, should have nothing to do with the right to hold the program.
Lawful protest is to be respected, but universities and the local government have the responsibility to protect the people and the property from rioters. Are we to be ruled by anarchists and have mob rule? If the police need to get tough to enforce the law, so be it.
If universities knuckle under threats of rioters, it will only encourage more censorship of what the mob does not want to hear, all across the country.
Sheldon Rabinowitz, Des Moines
Read or Share this story: http://dmreg.co/2kYEG0s
3:38
2:31
3:45
1:56
1:47
3:24
3:03
1:24
14:52
3:39
0) { %>
0) { %>
Read more:
Mob censorship can't be tolerated - DesMoinesRegister.com
Posted in Censorship
Comments Off on Mob censorship can’t be tolerated – DesMoinesRegister.com
Censorship versus free speech at a very local level – San Francisco … – San Francisco Chronicle
Posted: at 7:44 am
Free expression seems to be top of mind in the Bay Area these days. Ive been thinking about it, too but not in the context of how one should respond to a decadent disrupter whos chosen to threaten vulnerable people as part of his personal brand.
No, Ive been thinking not about Berkeley but about a quieter case in San Jose.
Thats where the Rev. Jeff Moore, a counselor at Independence High School in San Jose and president of the San Jose/Silicon Valley branch of the NAACP, was putting together the annual Black History Month display for the district office of East Side Union High School District.
Moore had seen and liked the work of Mark Harris, 47, a San Francisco painter and mixed-media artist. So he asked Harris to pull together a small exhibit of his work. Harris agreed. He drove down to San Jose and installed the work in the districts display cases on Jan. 30.
On Jan. 31, Harris woke up to a two-line email from Moore, saying that his work had been taken down.
So began a local censorship controversy thats stretched into a third week. Multiple media outlets have covered the story, and the National Coalition Against Censorship has taken an interest.
I should mention that Harris was an acquaintance of mine before any of this happened.
"Immigration Theory," a mixed-media piece by Mark Harris
"Immigration Theory," a mixed-media piece by Mark Harris
But my hunch is that Id probably have the same response even if I didnt know him: oh, no.
Pretty much, Harris said, Ive never had this happen before. Its disappointing because we have to tackle these issues if were going to come together as a country. And what better place to start this conversation than a school district?
Moore said hed hung Black History Month displays at the district for several years in a row, with no problems. Previous displays had been portraits of civil rights leaders, libraries of slave narratives and other pieces from Moores home.
This year, I thought these paintings were educational and gave us a chance to be in a dialogue with what America is talking about, Moore said.
The paintings are definitely political, verging on agit-prop: They juxtapose wholesome, 1950s-era kitsch images of white America with images of slavery, the Confederate flag and anti-police-brutality protests. These are certainly ideas that are in the public conversation.
I called Chris Funk, the superintendent who removed the paintings. He described the incident as a big misunderstanding.
This was an unfortunate incident that had nothing to do with Mark Harris, Funk said. It was about an employee who didnt have permission to display that work.
Moore didnt receive district approval for the contents of the display before inviting Harris to install his work, Funk said. After Harris left, Funk said he was called out of a meeting because parents and staff members had complained about the works content.
So he took all of it down.
When the public comes into the district office, they have an expectation that they shouldnt be surprised by provocative or political artwork, Funk said. Our responsibility is to provide a safe place for discussion, not to push an agenda.
Den of Iniquity, a mixed-media piece by Mark Harris.
Den of Iniquity, a mixed-media piece by Mark Harris.
I didnt find this convincing, for a few reasons. The first and most obvious reason is that children watch adults in classrooms push agendas each and every day.
The idea of a neutral, idea-free education may be a comforting one for adults, but no child would be naive enough to believe it, and theyre right.
The second reason I found Funks argument unconvincing is the matter of providing the specific students at East Side Union High School District with a safe place for discussion. East Side Union is a majority-minority school district 46 percent of the students are Latino, 34 percent are Asian. Only 8 percent of students are white, as is Funk.
How in the world, I asked him, can you say youre providing those students with a safe place for discussion if the political viewpoints of people of color African Americans, in this case are considered to be too controversial to be admitted?
Funk returned to the idea of a process that hadnt been followed.
The good news is that all of the attention inspired Harris and Funk to sit down and hammer out a solution. At 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, Feb. 15, the districts office will host a workshop with Harris, the students and their parents.
The workshop is open to all of the districts students, parents and with an RSVP the public. Harris plans to lead the students through a discussion of his work and ask them to talk about their own reactions.
Its a great moment to talk about these issues, and I want the kids to feel empowered to do so, Harris said. Weve been ingrained to not discuss this stuff, and its not healthy.
Tell me about it. If the district officials had been a little more comfortable talking about difficult issues, this entire mess could have been prevented.
Caille Millner is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: cmillner@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @caillemillner
Original post:
Censorship versus free speech at a very local level - San Francisco ... - San Francisco Chronicle
Posted in Censorship
Comments Off on Censorship versus free speech at a very local level – San Francisco … – San Francisco Chronicle
What Wikipedia’s Daily Mail ‘Ban’ Tells Us About The Future Of Online Censorship – Forbes
Posted: at 7:44 am
Forbes | What Wikipedia's Daily Mail 'Ban' Tells Us About The Future Of Online Censorship Forbes How was this decision made, what kind of data fed into this decision-making process and what does it tell us about the future of censorship and who decides what is real on the Internet, especially as social media platforms increasingly play the role ... WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard - Wikipedia Wikipedia bans Daily Mail as 'unreliable' source Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources - Wikipedia |
More:
What Wikipedia's Daily Mail 'Ban' Tells Us About The Future Of Online Censorship - Forbes
Posted in Censorship
Comments Off on What Wikipedia’s Daily Mail ‘Ban’ Tells Us About The Future Of Online Censorship – Forbes
Ron Paul: Don’t just reform taxes, cut them – Herald & Review
Posted: at 7:44 am
Many Americans who have wrestled with a 1040 form, or who have paid someone to prepare their taxes, no doubt cheered the news that Congress will soon resume working on tax reform. However, taxpayers should temper their enthusiasm because, even in the unlikely event tax collection is simplified, tax reform will not reduce the American people's tax burden.
Congressional leadership's one nonnegotiable requirement of any tax reform is "revenue neutrality." So any tax reform plan that has any chance of even being considered, much less passed, by Congress must ensure that the federal government does not lose a nickel in tax revenue. Congress's obsession with protecting the government's coffers causes reformers to mix tax cuts with tax increases. Congress's insistence on "offsetting" tax cuts with tax increases creates a political food fight where politicians face off over who should have their taxes raised, who should have their taxes cut, and who should have their taxes stay the same.
One offset currently being discussed is an increased tax on imports. This "border adjustment" tax would benefit export-driven industries at the expense of businesses that rely on imported products. A border adjustment tax would harm consumers who use, and retailers who sell, imported goods. The border adjustment tax is another example of politicians using tax reform to pick winners and losers instead of simply reducing everyone's taxes.
When I was in Congress, I was often told that offsets do not raise taxes, they simply close loopholes. This is merely a game of semantics: by removing a way for some Americans to lower their taxes, closing a loophole is clearly a tax increase. While some claim loopholes are another way government distorts the market, I agree with the great economist Ludwig von Mises that "capitalism breathes through loopholes."
By allowing individuals to keep more of their own money, loopholes promote economic efficiency since, as economist Thomas DiLorenzo put it, "private individuals always spend their own money more efficiently than government bureaucrats do." Instead of making the tax system more "efficient" by closing loopholes, Congress should increase both economic efficiency and economic liberty by repealing the income tax and replacing it with nothing.
The revenue loss from ending the income tax should be "offset" with spending cuts. All federal spending, whether financed by taxes or by debt, forcibly removes resources from the private sector. Thus, all government spending is in essence a form of taxation. Therefore, cutting income and other taxes without cutting spending merely replaces one type of taxation with another. Instead of directly paying for big government via income taxes, deficit spending means citizens will be hit with an increase in the inflation tax. This tax, imposed on the people with the Federal Reserve's monetization of debt, is the worst form of tax because it is both hidden and regressive.
Unfortunately, while Congress may make some small cuts in domestic spending, those cuts will be dwarfed by spending increases on infrastructure Keynesianism at home and military Keynesianism abroad. As long as Congress refuses to make serious reductions in spending, the American people will be subject to the tyranny of the IRS and the Federal Reserve.
The suffering will only get worse when concerns over government debt cause the dollar to lose its status as the world reserve currency. This will lead to a dollar crisis and a major economic meltdown. The only way to avoid this fate is for the people to demand a return to limited government in all areas, sound money, and an end to the income tax.
Ron Paul is a former Congressman and Presidential candidate. He can be reached at the RonPaulInstitute.org.
Continue reading here:
Ron Paul: Don't just reform taxes, cut them - Herald & Review
Posted in Ron Paul
Comments Off on Ron Paul: Don’t just reform taxes, cut them – Herald & Review
Ron Paul says likely Deputy Secretary of State Elliott Abrams is ‘the neocon’s neocon’ – Personal Liberty Digest
Posted: at 7:44 am
In a new interview with host Michael Tracey at The Young Turks, libertarian communicator and former presidential candidate Ron Paul expressed much concern about President Donald Trump potentially appointing Elliott Abrams to be deputy secretary of state. Paul says Abrams has a lousy record. Continuing, Paul calls Abrams the neocons neocon, noting that there has never been an intervention overseas that he didnt seem to enjoy.
Paul says in the interview that all of these interventions that Abrams supports did not work. Victory may be claimed in a sense from these interventions, Paul suggests, if they remade the Middle East so we had thriving democracies there where civil liberties are being protected and [each country] had a constitution somewhat leaning toward ours. But, in fact, Paul says that isnt the case as the wars have caused more harm than good.
Indeed, Trump has discussed this failure of US intervention in regard to the Iraq War. Throughout the presidential campaign, Trump brought up his opposition to the United States starting the Iraq War in 2003. In a February of 2016 debate, Trump called the Iraq War a big, fat mistake, a mistake that, Trump continued, cost two trillion dollars and thousands of lives. In addition, Trump asserted that Iran is taking over Iraq, with the second-largest oil reserves in the world. Concluding, Trump said:
George Bush made a mistake. We can make mistakes, but that one was a beauty. We should have never been in Iraq. We have destabilized the Middle East.
Therefore, it surprises many people that reports suggest Trump is considering Abrams for a State Department appointment. Abrams continues to support President George W. Bushs decision to wage war on Iraq.
Watch Pauls complete interview here:
Paul, along with co-host Daniel McAdams, discussed in detail the potentiality of Abrams as deputy secretary of state in the Tuesday episode of the Ron Paul Liberty Report:
In the Ron Paul Liberty Report discussion, Paul argues that Abrams could be one of the most important Trump appointments, and McAdams offers a possible big reason why Trump would want to consider appointing Abrams to the State Department position. McAdams explains that, while people will say that Abrams is so different from Trump, regarding Iran they are in lockstep: Elliott Abrams agrees with Trump and with [Secretary of Defense James Mattis] and with [National Security Advisor Michael Flynn] that Iran is the number one sponsor of terrorism, which is absolutely not true.
For an in-depth discussion by Paul of his views regarding neoconservatism, read here Pauls July 10, 2003 US House of Representatives speech Neo-Conned.
. Bookmark the
.
Read more here:
Ron Paul says likely Deputy Secretary of State Elliott Abrams is 'the neocon's neocon' - Personal Liberty Digest
Posted in Ron Paul
Comments Off on Ron Paul says likely Deputy Secretary of State Elliott Abrams is ‘the neocon’s neocon’ – Personal Liberty Digest
In my opinion: Ditch the two major parties register Libertarian – Maroon
Posted: at 7:43 am
February 10, 2017 Filed under Op/Ed, Opinions
Back in October, I wrote an editorial urging the Loyola community to check out Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson. The successful entrepreneur turned two-term governor of New Mexico garnered nearly 10 percent of the vote in his home state and 3.3 percent nationally, the most a third party presidential candidate has received since independent Ross Perot 20 years earlier.
OK, Johnson still didnt win and never had a chancewhats your point, Ricardo?
Im so glad you asked.
In 2008, the Libertarian candidate got 523,715 votes or 0.40 percent of the popular vote. In 2012, Gary Johnsons first run for the presidency saw 1,275,971 votes or one percent of the popular vote. And this past election cycle, 4,488,931 American voters thought a Libertarian was a better choice than the Democrat under F.B.I. investigation and the Republican who was a reality TV star Cheeto.
One of the main reasons Johnson didnt have a fair chance was because he, along with Green Party candidate Jill Stein, was excluded from the nationally televised presidential debates. The official reason is that he and Stein didnt have the polling numbers to be admitted.
But the bar gets raised higher and higher. Third party candidates are virtually always excluded.
The debate commission calls itself non-partisan and yet the way it operates benefits the two major parties to the detriment of the American people who deserve to hear another voiceone that might actually reflect what they think and feel.
Many voters are afraid to vote for a third party candidate because of whats called the spoiler effect. They fear that by voting for a less popular candidate who actually represents a majority of their views, they are taking away votes from a more popular candidate who doesnt represent a lot of what they want but is better than another major party candidate who is the polar opposite.
Ralph Nader, who ran as a Green in 2000, is often criticized as stealing the election from Al Gore and enabling George H.W. Bush to win, despite evidence to the contrary.
The takeaway message: research the philosophy of libertarianism, see if you agree and when youre ready to fight the two-party system and promote policies of freedom, register to vote as a Libertarian.
Our national platform states that Libertarians stand for the political freedom of everyone, including our ideological opponents.
For more information, visit the College Libertarians at Loyola University New Orleans Facebook page.
Read the rest here:
In my opinion: Ditch the two major parties register Libertarian - Maroon
Posted in Libertarianism
Comments Off on In my opinion: Ditch the two major parties register Libertarian – Maroon
MILO: President Trump, Here’s Why You Must Cut Federal Funding From UC Berkeley – Breitbart News
Posted: at 7:43 am
SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER
Reagans answer was to send in the National Guard, armed with buckshot and batons. Contrast this with Berkeleys more recent approach, which was to give professor and former Labor Secretary Robert Reich a platform to spew a hysterical conspiracy theory in which Breitbart and I hired domestic terrorists to beat upmy own fans and the residents of Berkeley and smash up Bank of America ATMs, Starbucks and trashcans.
SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER
But back to Reagan.He then gave a news conference, where, in Daddyesque fashion, he slapped down members of the media for encouraging the lawlessness.
The good news for President Trump and others interested in maintaining law and order in the face of leftist anarchy is that police crowd-control has advanced since the 1960s, and thereis no need to send in the National Guard with shotguns, as Reagan did, which ended up killing one student. In the twenty-first century, pepper spray and foam cannons can accomplish the same job without fatalities.
And theres even better news. Theres a way to defeat protests without buckshot, foam cannons,orpepper spray. A way to beat them before they even begin. Its simple: defund UC Berkeley, and any other campus that encourages the mad, radical politics that is now causing violence on Americas streets on a daily basis.
The Department of Education largely controls the purse-strings of American colleges. At UC Berkeley last year, federal funding came to $370 million more than half the universitys budget.Colleges fear the withdrawal of federal funds so much that when the Obama administration merely hinted at doing so in 2011 over the largely fabricated campus rape epidemic, it led to one of the greatest outbreaks of panic and miscarriages of justice in American history, as colleges set up kangaroo courts which frequently expelled students for sexual assault based on threadbare evidence.
The left are well aware of the existential threat they face. Thats why its Betsy DeVos and not, say, Jeff Sessions who is facing the toughest confirmation hearing. Jeff Sessions is important, of course, andwill no doubt do extraordinary work in foiling the mad globalist dream of open borders, but its what Trump might do in education that really strikes terror into the hearts of the left.
Higher education is their ideological breeding ground; the mad leftist displays that you see in Hollywood and Silicon Valley start on college campuses. Sessions is a problem for the left on a number of fronts, notably law and order and immigration. But if DeVos is bold and aggressive enough, she could tear out the beating heart of leftist power college ideological indoctrination. If colleges were effectively de-radicalized by DeVos, the left would take generations to recover.
At this point, some libertarians like the American partys cretinous chairman will be clutching their pearls at the thought of using the federal government to influence colleges. Once again (and this is why the right and why libertarians so often lose) they fail to grasp the cultural libertarian argument libertarian ideals will come to nothing in a culture that doesnt respect liberty.
This is what the do what you want, just leave me in peace to mine bitcoin and smoke weed faction of libertarianism I.e., most libertarians dont understand. A similar argument obtains when talking about protecting the first amendment from sources of hostility to free speech, such as Islam, feminism and most of the media.
And where are cultural values incubated? Colleges, of course! As long as campuses are churning out students who hate free speech and free markets, what hope is there for libertarian policy priorities? If libertarians want to live in a free society, theyd better get ready to tread on their opponents.
At my UC Berkeley show last week, anti-fascistsset college property on fire, smashed up bank windows and ATMs,jumped on peoples cars, andlooted downtown stores, including the much-beloved liberal Starbucks.
They alsoassaulted dozens of my fans,who were falsely accused of being Nazis.
The San Francisco Chronicle reports that left-wing rioterscaused around $600,000 in damages that night, with the riot starting at the college before spreadingto downtown Berkeley. $600,000. Thats an awful lot of money for a communist tantrum.
The day after,my tour bus was tracked and my hotel location was leaked online. Left-wing Berkeley activists took out the remainder of their frustration on the bus, which was vandalized with spray paint.
Following the chaos,only one suspect was arrested, and celebrities, the mainstream media, the Mayor of Berkeley, and UC Berkeley administrators blamed the damage on me a homosexual conservative who was unable to deliver a speech becausestudents, brainwashed by their Marxist professors, decided to set their campus on fire.
For decades, the university campus has been a hotbed of dogma, brainwashing generation after generation in the most fashionable and foolhardy leftist ideas of the day. From professors offering extra credit to attend anti-Trump rallies to courses on The Problem of Whiteness, leftists on campus are teaching younger generations how to hate. Is it any wonder that they then go around smashing windows and punching people in the face? And if that isnt bad enough, these thugs are absolutely terrible at identifying their ideological enemies according to the account of Malini Ramaiyer in the New York Times, one person called a Nazi and assaulted was a Syrian Muslim student. Oops! Who could have predicted training young people to attack instead of argue could turn out badly?
And by the way, if youre a NYT or Buzzfeed or CNN journalist reading this, youre to blame too, for creating an environment in which its okay to call conservatives Nazis and white supremacists. What did you think was going to happen?
The current atmosphere is also terrible for college students themselves. Theyre paying hundreds of thousands of dollars to attend what are effectively progressive madrasas, turning them into little more than brainwashed street fighters. Today, a gender studies graduate seems more likely to end up in jail for destruction of property than in a stable job. Perhaps that is part of the plan striking fear into the patriarchy one load of prison laundry at a time.
It can end, and it must end, or America will face eight years of violence on its streets, and who knows what state the country will be in after that? all because public universities refuse to honor their first amendment responsibilities.
It starts with Berkeley. President Daddy, tear down their funding.
DANGEROUS is available to pre-order now via Amazon, in hardcover and Kindle editions. And yes, MILO is reading the audiobook version himself!
FollowMilo Yiannopoulos (@Nero)on Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat. Hear him every FridayonThe Milo Yiannopoulos Show. Write to Milo atmilo@breitbart.com.
Here is the original post:
MILO: President Trump, Here's Why You Must Cut Federal Funding From UC Berkeley - Breitbart News
Posted in Libertarianism
Comments Off on MILO: President Trump, Here’s Why You Must Cut Federal Funding From UC Berkeley – Breitbart News
Editor’s Picks #463 – Archinect
Posted: at 7:41 am
For the latest in the newish series, Small Studio Snapshots, Nicholas Korody chatted with Los Angeles-based studio MILLINS. Daniel Elmorefelt "these guys sound legit in their intentions and I'm looking forward to seeing what they produce in the future...The rest of the article is uncommonly decipherable for architects".
Plus, Stefano Colombo,Luca MarulloandEugenio Cosentino went "Looking for a picture that represents something related to the internet and ending up thinking about the desert."Max Headroom, F.AIA got excited "the phrase 'last existing encrypted space is genius on many many levels. exciting work!"
News In an interview with NPRs MarketPlace Carl Bass, CEO of Autodesk, explained how computers are superior (in some things) to human designers.JamesJoist got serious
"Spoken like true transhumanist scum; I often think AutoCAD was one of the worst things to happen to architecture. As you might expect the overall reception was poor."
Reacting to the all-female lineup for the Carnegie Mellon University School of Architecture's Spring '17 lecture series, b3tadine[sutures] quipped "Now I understand why SCI-Arc couldn't get any women to lecture, there aren't any left. Is SCI-Arc being run by former Jay Leno bookers?"
Steven Holl Architects released plansfor a, pair of white concrete buildings, new Cultural and Health Center in Shanghai.
With I am sure tongue firmly in cheek, archanonymous offered up Mr. Holl some advice "i love your work but if you don't do an emergency shelter and social housing in the next 5 years you're never going to get that Pritzker."tduds chimed in "Really, though, this is beautiful. Holl was a tough sell for me when I was younger but he's really won me over lately."
The AIA's Equity in Architecture Commission Releases Report, with its eleven priority recommendations for action, is required reading.
Mayfair House in London, UK by Squire and Partnersand Charles Street Car Park in Sheffield, UK by Allies and Morrison, are just two of the great projects from the latest Ten Top Images on Archinect's "Fancy Facades" Pinterest Board.
Firms/Work Updates Farzam Kharvaristarted Radio Architecture a new blog, and introduced himself.
Meanwhile, over at his blog Elemental Urbanism, James Pereirawrote about MaMuCre. Which led Max Headroom, F.AIAto note "David Ruy once said in my grad class Algorithms are recipes. The cooking analogy is great, always thought that was the best analogy and real portrayal of detailing in architecture."
For anyone looking for a new job and wanting to live in New Orleans,Eskew+Dumez+Rippleis looking to hire a Sustainability Enabler. Or the City and County of San Francisco needs an Urban Designer/Architect.
Anton Romashovbegan sharing photos of architecture (both modern and ancient) in Peru.
School/Blogs
Due to an unexpected surge in applications, the Free School of Architecture (FSA) will significantly increase its inaugural class size for 2017.
For a theory course at UIC, Jamie Evelyn Goldsboroughand her fellow students are researching an architectural typology that has been disrupted / effected by American capitalism. She selected Motels / Hotels. The project is heavily rooted in Eisenman's Frankfurt Rebstock Competition project of "the Fold." Jamie also posted a process drawing.
For those interested in a job in academia, University of Kentucky is accepting applications for either an Associate or Full Professor in Interior Design. Or an Associate or Full Professor, Director of Design Technology, with a focus on "developing, implementing and conducting courses that integrate technology within the curriculum."
UCLAAUD6 put out the call for POOL Issue No.2., submissions of communicative media surrounding the authorities that prescribe, the bodies that obey, and the administrators who implement rules. The deadline is February 20, 2017.
Discussions/Threads
johnshoe was looking for thoughts on the use of anADA Cheat Sheet. The earliest commenters recommended just learning ANSI A117.1 "Learn the code as it's written. You'll be more valuable to your firm, the profession, and the general public."senjohnblutarsky reminded folks of the Adobe "search function". As tintt sees it "Construction documents are supposed to be clear and concise and not have redundancies or conflicting information."
mbcube2 is in need of some career advice.Josh Mingsinitial response "I never would have taken such a pay cut. Volunteer is on point."gruen thought the story sounded familiar "Oh, is NBBJ still up to their old tricks? LOL, legendary."Contrary to manyshellarchitect counseled sticking it out "Having the local manager on your side is a great ally...I have a hard time believing that people would be purposely deceitful (wishful thinking?)...More likely the decision makers have changed."
Finally, daerquestioned how to structurally support his staircase, for a school project. Andrew.Circle expanded upon earlier suggestions from archanonymous and Non Sequitur. He also called attention to a deficient for the US guardrail, in the rendering. mightyaa answered the original question simply "Basic Physics" Later randomised posted an example from japan of a gorgeous staircase. (yet tduds nightmare) without a railing.
Additionally
ICYMI, back in November of last year, Keefer Dunn dove "into the failed thinking about the ways in which architecture creates change in order to unpack some of the lessons valuable to architects who are becoming activists and wondering what to do now."
View original post here:
Editor's Picks #463 - Archinect
Posted in Transhumanist
Comments Off on Editor’s Picks #463 – Archinect