Page 2,015«..1020..2,0142,0152,0162,017..2,0202,030..»

Category Archives: Transhuman News

NASA buys two more seats to the International Space Station on … – The Verge

Posted: February 28, 2017 at 7:47 pm

NASA has agreed to fly at least two more astronauts on upcoming Russian Soyuz missions to the International Space Station, the space agency announced in a press release. The news comes in the wake of delays to NASAs Commercial Crew Program, an initiative where two American companies SpaceX and Boeing are being paid to create spacecraft that can ferry astronauts to the ISS. Those flights were originally supposed to happen this year, but are now estimated to take place no earlier than 2019.

The additional seats are being worked into an existing contract with Boeing, which helps operate the ISS. The agreement extension covers two seats on Soyuz flights this year and next year, and includes options for seats on three Soyuz flights in 2019. Boeing acquired theses seats from Russian aerospace company RSC Energia, and has been trying to sell them to NASA since January. The total cost of all five seats is $373.5 million, or $74.7 million per seat a touch short of the $81.7 million NASA has been paying Roscosmos.

Flights with SpaceX and Boeing should be cheaper than Russia when they happen

The US hasnt had the capability to send its own astronauts to space (or bring them back) since the Space Shuttle program was discontinued in 2011. Private US spaceflight companies were growing at a rapid pace then, so NASA decided to fund these companies so they could become a sort of space taxi service for American astronauts. The Commercial Crew Program was intended to give NASA a cheaper alternative to Russia, but the program has been hampered by delays and cost issues. The space agency is also planning to fly astronauts on its own Orion spacecraft and the Space Launch System (SLS) maybe as early as 2019, but that program has also been delayed.

In 2015, NASA spent $490 million on six more Soyuz seats as a hedge against the possibility that the SpaceX and Boeing spacecraft wouldnt be ready in time. Seats on the Soyuz are typically sorted out three years in advance when dealing directly with Roscosmos. (NASA was able to book the two new seats with less time since they had already been accounted for when they were bought by RSC Energia.)

It was a prescient move because Boeing delayed twice the first crewed flight of its spacecraft, Starliner, in 2016. And SpaceX followed suit at the end of the year, saying in December that the human-rated version of its Dragon spacecraft wouldnt fly with a crew until at least 2018.

This is not the first time NASA has extended the contract with Russia

Two weeks ago, the Government Accountability Office a federal agency that performs audits for Congress released a report that estimated SpaceX and Boeing wont be ready to fly humans to space until 2019. The GAO cited concerns about a particular defect in SpaceXs engine turbines, as well as Boeings reliance on Russian rocket engines as some of the reasons.

NASA addressed the GAO report implicitly in the press release about the contract extension with Russia. NASAs Commercial crew transportation providers Boeing and SpaceX have made significant progress toward returning crew launches to the US, but external review groups have recommended an option to protect for delays or problems in certification, the agency wrote.

The contract extension with Russia was actually announced a week ago, and it was first spotted by SpaceNews, which points out the curious nature of how NASA quietly published the news. The agency is currently in a transitional phase as it waits for President Donald Trump to name a new NASA administrator.

NASA is waiting for Trump to name a new administrator

Robert Lightfoot, who is serving as acting administrator, recently sent a memo to NASA employees explaining his interest in accelerating NASAs plans for human spaceflight. He asked for NASA and Lockheed Martin, which makes Orion and SLS, to evaluate whether it would be possible to put a crew on the first flight of that spaceship / rocket combination in 2018 instead of 2021. Its a bold idea for a space agency that is known for caution, but it aligns with what we know the Trump administration wants out of NASA: an increased emphasis on human spaceflight and space exploration in general.

President Trump said in his inaugural address that we will unlock the mysteries of space, Lightfoot wrote. The SLS and Orion missions, coupled with those promised from record levels of private investment in space, will help put NASA and America in a position to unlock those mysteries and to ensure this nations world preeminence in exploring the cosmos.

More here:
NASA buys two more seats to the International Space Station on ... - The Verge

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on NASA buys two more seats to the International Space Station on … – The Verge

Will Mars Colonists Evolve Into This New Kind of Human? – NBCNews.com

Posted: at 7:47 pm

Artist's impression of how Mars colonists might look after thousands of years of life on the red planet. Joseph Ventura

In other words, becoming a multiplanet species might lead us to become multiple species.

"This

New species or not?

Six thousand years isn't long in evolutionary terms. After all, Homo sapiens has existed as

"Evolution to a new species by the classic definition of not being able to breed with humans would take a long time, probably thousands of generations and a hundred thousand years," University of Arizona astronomer Dr. Chris Impey told NBC News MACH in an email. On the other hand, he added, "changing enough to look physically distinct would be much quicker, tens or perhaps a hundred generations."

Dr. Philipp Mittercker, a theoretical biologist at the University of Vienna in Austria, said in an email to MACH that he, too, is dubious of rapid speciation.

"Speciation is a long-term process that usually requires reproductive isolation over millions of years," Mittercker said. "Some human populations had been isolated for thousands of years and are still far away from being a separate species. It is thus unlikely that humans who had colonized Mars [would] become a separate species."

Solomon acknowledged that the path of human evolution on Mars is speculative. But he told MACH in an email that "it follows from what we know about evolutionary biology" that Mars colonists might evolve faster than some think.

And the apparent absence of microbial life on Mars might play a key role.

Evidence suggests that Mars may be devoid of life, and that goes for pathogenic bacteria as well as other life forms. If humans were to establish and live within a germ-free Mars colony, Solomon said, the colonists' immune systems could eventually lose the ability to fight off infections that might be introduced to the colony by germ-carrying humans or animals visiting from Earth. That risk presumably would encourage the colonists to minimize contact including sexual contact with potentially infectious earthlings. That, in turn, could accelerate the pace at which the colonists' bodies would begin to adapt to their new world.

Surprising differences

How might these Martian people differ from their distant ancestors in other words, from us? Whether or not they evolved into a new species, they might have anatomical as well as immunological and other physiological differences. Solomon said they might have notably thicker bones (including the skull bones), which might give them a more robust appearance perhaps a bit like members of the extinct proto-human Paranthropus genus, including

Why would that be? Bones need to work against the force of gravity to stay strong.

Evolutionary pressure for beefier skeletons might be especially strong for female Mars colonists, Solomon said, given the risk of pelvic fractures during childbirth. Beefier skeletons or not, Solomon said, female colonists might come to opt for cesarean section over natural childbirth. And since the size of the human head is constrained in part by the dimensions of the birth canal, the heads of Mars colonists might become larger than what is seen in humans on Earth.

If that sounds far-fetched, consider this: recent research by Mittercker and others suggests that the rising popularity of C-sections may be allowing an

So Mars colonists might have beefy bones and big heads. Then there's the question of their eyes.

Related:

Mars is much farther from the sun than is the Earth, and the extra distance and the lower levels of sunlight on the Martian surface could cause changes in the colonists' eyes.

"During a good day, Mars looks like an overcast day on Earth," Dr. Nathalie Cabrol, a planetary scientist at the SETI Institute in Mountain View, Calif., told NBC News MACH in an email. "Our eyes are accustomed to a certain amount of light on Earth. If there has to be some adaptation to these new ambient conditions, then either our optical system and brain will have to develop new ways of collecting more light on the retina, or we will develop new retinas or bigger eyes."

The need to protect those bigger eyes might be another reason the colonists' skulls might become more robust, Cabrol said, adding that it wasn't clear whether the changes she envisions would be evidence of a new species or simply a version of Homo sapiens adapted for life in a different environment.

Of course, evolutionary changes in humans on Mars would occur only if humans were able to reproduce and successfully raise their children in the low-gravity Martian environment. Cabrol said the colonists might need some sort of "gravity chamber" in which to reproduce and in which their offspring could spend their early developmental years in conditions closer to those on Earth.

Peculiar pigmentation

Another potential change for the Mars colonists would be their skin pigmentation.

"Because of less light," Cabrol said, "I would say that it is possible that the skin of these humans will become ... pale over time, and their hair light-toned."

Solomon sees things differently.

The Martian atmosphere is thinner than Earth's, and the red planet has essentially no protective magnetic field. Thus people living on Mars would be exposed to high levels of cancer-causing radiation even if they spent most of their lives indoors. Pigmentation helps block the effects of radiation. The deeper the color, the better the protection. Thus Solomon figures Mars people might evolve to have darker skin than anyone on Earth.

On the other hand, Solomon said, life on Mars might yield people whose skin is pigmented by carotenoids rather than our usual pigment, melanin. (Something similar has been

Cultural and technological changes

Is Solomon right, generally speaking, about the changing appearance of Mars colonists? That's impossible to say. But no matter what, experts agree that Mars colonists would likely drift away culturally and technologically from their terrestrial ancestors.

As Impey told MACH, "They will probably be aggressive in genetic engineering and self-modification (body part and organ enhancement and replacement), to the extent of embedding various monitoring and repair devices, and taking a cyborg path. This will be a very technology-forward cohort, advancing far beyond the average terrestrial society."

Video:

Impey said it was hard to predict the psychological effects of living on Mars. But as the colonists "are removed from human affairs," he continued, "they will probably develop their own cultural norms and dialects, and start to feel very distinct or post-human."

If the colonists do change dramatically from their ancestors back on Earth, how would we view them? Would we consider them alien beings or just subtly different humans?

Solomon thinks the latter possibility is more likely.

"In the past, when there were multiple species of human around (i.e. Neanderthals, Denisovans, and Homo sapiens), we know they had sex with one another and had babies that survived," he said in an email. "That suggests to me that we view other humanlike species as being more human than animal."

Here's to good neighbors.

Follow NBC MACH on

Read more:
Will Mars Colonists Evolve Into This New Kind of Human? - NBCNews.com

Posted in Mars Colonization | Comments Off on Will Mars Colonists Evolve Into This New Kind of Human? – NBCNews.com

People Are Building a Museum on the Moon Because "Art" – Papermag

Posted: at 7:47 pm

Sick of gravity? Over Earth? Bored with "conventional" art in galleries where you can conveniently breathe oxygen without a mask when all you really want is the risk of death when consuming culture? Well, do I have some truly ideal news for you! People are now trying to build an art gallery on the moon to meet all your space art viewing needs! That's right, an art gallery!

The museum has already been established as 'The Museum of Contemporary Art on the Moon', or MoCAM. It represents, according to artists Julio Orto and Joey Cannizzaro, an "anti-capitalist future" necessary for authenticity in art to survive and thrive.

Because Orto and Cannizzaro believe colonization of the moon is "inevitable", they've already bought a 20 acre plot of land on everyone's favorite satellite. Cannizzaro explains the art gallery would be both an answer to the current political landscape and to oppose "governments and private entities are (who) working on tourism and colonization of the moon".

Cannizzaro writes in an essay that, "at the dawn of Trump's aggregate neoliberal-fascism... it's impossible for the creative community to dodge accountability for this lack of imaginative futures".

Why move to New Zealand to escape Trump's America when you can (likely very soon) move to the moon and look at art to your heart's content?

[h/t Dazed] Image via YouTube

Original post:
People Are Building a Museum on the Moon Because "Art" - Papermag

Posted in Moon Colonization | Comments Off on People Are Building a Museum on the Moon Because "Art" – Papermag

Relics of the Ancient Past: Q&A with Author Alastair Reynolds on ‘Revenger’ – Space.com

Posted: at 7:47 pm

Two young women join a dangerous expedition combing through the rubble left behind from countless past solar system civilizations in "Revenger" (Orbit, 2017), the latest book by prolific science-fiction writer Alastair Reynolds. The book was released today (Feb. 28) in the United States.

Although Reynolds is known for his hard science fiction and space opera, "Revenger" takes on a more fantastical tone, featuring space pirate protagonists and inscrutable alien technology. Space.com talked with Reynolds about how the book developed, the constellation of tiny solar system worlds he depicted (and its inspiration) and what the future might hold for human space colonization. [Best Space Books and Sci-Fi: A Space.com Reading List]

Space.com: How is "Revenger" different from your other science-fiction stories?

Alastair Reynolds: "Revenger" is my 14th or 15th novel, depending on how you count them. I had written a lot of science fiction over the years that's very I suppose you could say is quite strongly grounded in semiserious speculation about physics and cosmology and engineering and space travel, because I have a background in space science. For "Revenger," I wanted to do something that was a little bit looser, that was more in the direction of science fantasy.

Alastair Reynolds, author of "Revenger," is a former space scientist and prolific science fiction writer.

It's very, very far future, it deals with a cast of characters that don't fully understand the rules that govern their universe: They have some theories, but they're not entirely sure about how some things work and why things behave the way they do. And they're living in a culture where they're human, or humanoid, but there've been many, many previous civilizations that have come and gone, and every time one of these civilizations comes and goes, they leave behind relics and technologies and artifacts that stick around for millions of years, and they can be found and reutilized by the characters in the book. But they don't always quite understand what they're using, or the dangers. It's a pick-and-mix culture that lives off the relics and detritus of past civilizations.

The technology that the humans have direct access to is never that advanced; it approaches the level of wireless sets and early radar maybe some television but it never goes beyond that. Although they're doing space exploration, it's all very perilous, because the ships are only held together by spit and prayer.

Space.com: How did that setting come together with the space pirate adventure story?

Reynolds: About 10 years ago, I started writing little notes to myself about a possible future project which would involve teams of explorers who have this occupation where they have a limited amount of time to break into some sort of alien structure or artifact where they have to get in quickly, get the treasure, but they're not really sure how long they've got inside before the doors shut again. It's a sort of "Indiana Jones"-type scenario where you've got to raid the tomb and then get out quickly. I thought that could be fun but I couldn't quite find the right way into the story.

And then a few years later, completely unrelated to that, I started writing notes about an adventure series that would be set in our own solar system, but so far in the future that all the planets have been dismantled and reforged into tiny little asteroids little independent worlds that have their own ecosystems and gravity, drifting around the sun in a Dyson swarm of microplanets. I thought that could be fun, because you can have millions of different cultures and civilizations, much as you would in the "Star Wars" universe, but you wouldn't need hyperdrive to get from A to B. You can just use existing space-navigation technology ion drives or solar sails because nothing would be that far apart.

But again, I didn't really do anything with it; I just had the notes festering on my computer for a few years. And then I finished a big trilogy that was very much grounded in fairly plausible speculation about near-future exoplanets and relativistic star flight and things like that. I felt like doing something different and I realized, actually, I've got two separate ideas here that I couldn't make work on their own, but if I combined them, I might have a basis for a novel. [Science Fiction Barely Ahead of Space Exploration Reality]

Space.com: Was writing from a more first-person perspective very different from your usual process?

Reynolds: I've done quite a few short stories over the years, and I've used various voices and viewpoints in my short fiction, but I'd never really written a novel from a first-person viewpoint, and I've never written a novel from the viewpoint of a teenage girl, either.

[It was a challenge] to tell the world from her point of view, through her eyes I tried at all points to think, Well, what would she know at this point in the story? What would really concern her and what would she not be that bothered about?

One of the dangers of science fiction, particularly bad science fiction, is that you have these scenes where the characters turn to a blackboard and start explaining how this faster-than-light drive works, or something like that. We never really have those conversations in real life. That's not part of the way we interact as human beings. I try to avoid that in my fiction, but I was particularly determined to avoid it with "Revenger." There's going to be things in there that don't seem to make sense or are not clear. But if you go with the flow, then hopefully the wider setting and its rules will start to come into focus.

Space.com: The characters seem to have little understanding about how the alien tech they encounter works. How much of that did you fully work out?

Reynolds: if you're creating a whole universe, even if it's a universe squeezed into a solar system, you have to use a little bit of sleight of hand. I liken it to one of those old-time Wild West stage sets where the shop fronts look quite convincing, but when you walk around the back, it's all just plywood it's propped up, and it's all quite rickety. That's how I approach world building as such I try to shore up the bits that really matter and then try to bluff my way around the rest, because it would just be completely impractical to completely work out every single aspect of an invented world. That's not what attracts me to fiction, anyway. Some things you just have to take on the fly and almost deceive the reader into thinking that you know things better than you do.

I just trust that, if there's alien technology behind it, and it doesn't violate the laws of physics, then there's an explanation somewhere.

Space.com: Do you think that a community of microworlds could really develop in the future?

Reynolds: I read a nonfiction book a long time ago that I've picked up on a few other science fiction writers who've also read the same book, because we're riffing off some of the same ideas in it. [That book is "The Millennial Project: Colonizing the Galaxy in Eight Easy Steps" (Little, Brown and Company, 1992) by Marshall Savage] I don't think the guy ever wrote anything else It's a nonfiction book, but it's also a kind of pedagogical manifesto-type book where the guy is trying to lay out his ideas for what future human civilization should look like. It's all a bit cultish, in a way you read it with a slightly skeptical frame of mind, because it's very utopian and cultish in the way he describes things.

But one of the things an image in that book that really struck me was the idea that he's talking about energy utilization in the very far future. And he says that if we're serious as a civilization about expanding and moving into space, his hobbyhorse is that we need to actually expand the human population massively. As he says, the more billions of us there are, then the more geniuses there will be. He's all for creating trillions of human beings around the sun far more than the Earth could sustain. He has this idea that we move into the solar system and take all the rubble and reforge it into lots of little planets that have their own ecosystems, and they're like little glass balls with forests inside them, basically, and everyone lives in these little balls and moves around between them.

The vision that stuck with me, that really left a mark, was that he said that if you surrounded the sun with enough of these things, then it would actually filter the starlight, so that from a distance, the sun wouldn't look yellow anymore, it would start to look green, because you're seeing the sun's light passing through effectively a vast wall of foliage, vegetation. [Dyson Spheres: How Advanced Alien Civilizations Would Conquer the Galaxy (Infographic)]

Space.com: If humans were to spread out on a large scale beyond Earth, do you think humanity is more likely to be constrained to the solar system or to establish far-off outposts?

Reynolds: I used to be a strong believer that we would eventually colonize the solar system the way it's been done in science fiction many, many times: bases on the moon, Mars colonized, move out to the outer planets, then we go to the next solar system and build a colony there. I don't know now I'm not as convinced that's the way it's going to pan out. I just think space exploration it's not that it's difficult, as such, it's not that we couldn't do it, but my suspicion is that we will be demotivated, we will be less and less motivated to colonize interstellar space as we mature as a civilization.

As our collective knowledge base increases, we may reach a point where we say, well, actually, we don't need to go anywhere, because the information is with us. We can do what we like with the information; we can inhabit these worlds through virtual reality if we choose, we don't actually need to be physically present. And if we do need to go and extract samples, we can send robots, and it doesn't matter if they take 1,000 years to get there, they can report back when they arrive. I'm a little bit less inclined to believe the grand science-fiction dream of interstellar colonization. I think it's still an interesting idea to play with in fictional terms, but if I had to put my money on it, I'd say it's probably looking less likely now than when I started my career, even though it's only 15 years.

My take on it is we'll probably expand into the solar system to some degree as a human civilization, because it's within our realistic, feasible technological capabilities to do so. But I'm not terribly convinced that we will be strongly motivated to move beyond the solar system, even if we have the technical means. I think we may just decide that that's something we no longer ... when you're an adult, there are things that you really, really wanted to do as a child, but you're no longer interested in doing. I think that may apply to us as a civilization; some of the goals we have now may seem largely pointless to us as we mature. ['Alien Megastructure' Star Being Investigated By UC Berkeley (Video)]

Space.com: And there's plenty in the solar system already.

Reynolds: Why would you need to expand beyond the solar system, if you already have access to all the information you need, and you've essentially insulated yourself against a planetary apocalypse? Maybe that's enough. And the solar system's a huge place, anyway. It's a truly mind-boggling place that's one of the disservices that science fiction has done to us, particularly in the last few decades is make the solar system seem cramped and homely and not particularly interesting. But the solar system is enormous, and we don't have a clear sense of how far out it goes, anyway. Pluto is by no means the end of the solar system: There's vast tracts of trans-Neptunian space beyond Pluto, and then there's the Oort cloud, which is like a tenth of the way to the next solar system. So there's a hell of a lot of real estate there that we haven't even begun to scratch the surface of.

This interview has been edited for length. You can buy "Revenger" on Amazon.com, andread an excerpt here.

Email Sarah Lewin at slewin@space.com or follow her @SarahExplains. Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.

Continue reading here:
Relics of the Ancient Past: Q&A with Author Alastair Reynolds on 'Revenger' - Space.com

Posted in Moon Colonization | Comments Off on Relics of the Ancient Past: Q&A with Author Alastair Reynolds on ‘Revenger’ – Space.com

SpaceX Is Sending Two People On A Round Trip to the Moon, Hopefully – SnapMunk

Posted: at 7:47 pm

Sometimes around the SnapMunk offices, we like to place bets on whats going to make the news that week. Recently there are two people weve stopped taking bets on: one is Donald Trump and the other is Elon Musk. Recently the worlds favorite CEO made an announcement about his SpaceX program that turned a lot of heads: His latest plan is to launch two people around the moon.

Now before you mention how weve done this thing before, lets break it down.

SpaceX has a long list of successful launches under its belt to low-earth orbit, and weve already written about Musks intention to begin colonization of Mars last year. So at some point, his company would have to leave the low-earth orbit limit. To accomplish this, the next logical step would be a trip to the Moon if he wishes to reach his larger benchmarks of Mars colonization within the next ten years. For the record, the low-Earth limit hasnt been breached by man since the final Apollo mission in 1972.

The goal of the trip is to take two pilots in late 2018 on a round trip from Earth to the Moon and back without landing on the moons surface. During that voyage, the route that they will take will exceed previous milestones.Im guessing probably distance-wise probably 300,000 to 400,000 miles.According to Musk. This projection exceeds the current maximum distance humans have traveled from our planet as the current record sits at 248,655 milesheld by the crew of the Apollo 13. Yes, that Apollo 13.

Image courtesy williamdparker.com

We know little about the two people who intend to take the flight. We do know they are private citizens who approached Musk last year with interest to make the trip. Since then theyve begun taking extensive health and fitness tests. Also, he admitted that the two would pay for the flight but was quick to report they were not Hollywood celebrities. We arent sure why thats even a factor, but it helps us narrow it down. I think theyre going in with their eyes open, knowing that there is some risk here, Musk said. Were doing everything we can to minimize that risk, but its not zero.

Its also important to remember that the SpaceX program has yet to launch with humans actually inside it. In turn, the Falcon Heavy rocket intended for this journey has yet to fly. So at this time, the only part of this endeavor we know works is the launchpad, which is the same one used in the Apollo missions.

Musk has stated that if NASA wished to partner with SpaceX, he would allow it, insisting that the agency would have priority over the two passengers. Given the projected date and the current status of the project itself, were pretty sure theyll put a hard pass on this one.

SnapMunk is dedicated to providing readers with all things interesting, exciting and entertaining in the world of tech news, startup companies and startup culture. With a broad lens feeding a highly curated stream of content, SnapMunk offers thought-leading perspectives and unique insights into technology current events, new business ideas, cool new technology and exciting investment opportunities. It is our goal with SnapMunk to ensure that those who are interested in technology and startups are not only well-informed but intellectually inspired and thoroughly entertained.

More:
SpaceX Is Sending Two People On A Round Trip to the Moon, Hopefully - SnapMunk

Posted in Moon Colonization | Comments Off on SpaceX Is Sending Two People On A Round Trip to the Moon, Hopefully – SnapMunk

Weird world of DNA: What’s the best way to help patients with genetic diseases that are not inherited? – Genetic Literacy Project

Posted: at 7:46 pm

Mendels laws, like any laws in science, are wonderful because they make predictions possible. A woman and man both carry a recessive mutation in the same gene, and each of their children has a 25% chance of inheriting both mutations and the associated health condition. Bio 101.

In contrast to our bizarre new world of alternate facts, multiple interpretations, and both are true scenarios, science is both logical and rational. If an observation seems to counter dogma, then we investigate and get to the truth. Thats what happened for Millie and Hannah, whose stories illustrate two ways that genetic disease can seem to veer from the predictions of Mendels first law: that genes segregate, one copy from each parent into sperm and ova, and reunite at fertilization. (Ill get to embryo engineering at the end.)

Millies situation is increasingly common exome or genome sequencing of a child-parent trio reveals a new (de novo), dominant mutation in the child, causing a disease that is genetic but not inherited.

Hannahs situation is much rarer: inheriting a double dose of a mutation from one parent and no copies of the gene from the other.

Millie McWilliams was born on September 2, 2005. At first she seemed healthy, lifting her head and rolling over when most babies do. But around 6 months, her head became shaky, like an infants. Then she stopped saying dada, recalled her mother Angela.

By Millies first birthday, her head shaking had become a strange, constant swaying. She couldnt crawl nor sit, had bouts of irritability and vomiting, and bit her hands and fingers.

In genetic diseases, odd habits and certain facial features can be clues, but none of the many tests, scans, and biopsies that Millie underwent lead to a diagnosis. Nor were her parents carriers of any known conditions that might explain her symptoms. Still, it was possible that Millie had an atypical presentation of a recessive condition so rare that it isnt included in test panels.

Millie McWilliams

By age 6 Millie couldnt speak, was intellectually disabled, and was confined to a wheelchair, able to crawl only a few feet. Today she requires intensive home-based therapies. But Millie can communicate. She likes to look at what she wants, with an intense stare, said Angela. She loves country music and Beyonc, and every once in awhile something funny will happen and shell break into a big smile.

Millies pediatrician, Dr. Sarah Soden, suggested that trio genome sequencing, just beginning to be done at Childrens Mercy Kansas City(where the child already received care) as part of a long-term project, might help to assemble the clinical puzzle pieces to explain the worsening symptoms. So the little girl and her parents, Angela and Earl, had their genomes sequenced in December 2011. Analyzing the data took months, but Dr. Sodens team finally found a candidate mutation in the child but not her parents. However the gene, ASXL3, hadnt been linked to a childhood disease. Yet.

Its typically a matter of time for gene annotation to catch up to sequencing efforts and clinical clues. In February of 2013, a report in Genome Medicinedescribed four children with mutations in ASXL3 who had symptoms like Millies. Even her facial structures arched eyebrows, flared nostrils, and a high forehead matched those of the other children, as well as the hand-biting. They all haveBainbridge-Ropers syndrome.

One copy of Millies ASXL3 gene is missing two DNA bases, creating an inappropriate stop codon and shortening the encoded proteins. From this new glitch somehow arose the strange symptoms. Because neither Earl nor Angela has the mutation, it must have originated in either a sperm or an egg that went on to become Millie.

Since the paper about Bainbridge-Ropers syndrome was published three years ago, a few dozen individuals have been diagnosed and families have formed a support group and a Facebookpage. Thats huge. Even if a disease has no treatment, as is the case for Bainbridge-Ropers, families find comfort in reaching the end of the diagnostic odyssey and locating others. Said Angela, It was a relief to finally put a name on it and figure out what was actually going on with her, and then to understand that other families have this too. Ive been able to read about her diagnosis and what other kids are going through.

Hannah Sames will be celebrating her 13th birthday next month, and is showing what may be early signs of strength in her muscles after receiving gene therapyinto her spinal cord last summer to treat giant axonal neuropathy (GAN).

When I first met Hannahs mom Lori in 2010, she told me that Hannah had inherited the exact same deletion mutation in the gigaxonin gene from her and her husband Matt. At that time, only a few dozen children were known to have the condition, and that number hasnt risen much. Because of the diseases rarity, I politely asked ifLori and Matt could be cousins but not know it. Shared ancestry seemed a more likely explanation for two identicalextremely rare gene variants occurring in the same child than the parents having the same length deletion just by chance. But no, Matt and Lori arent related.

The answer came just a few months ago: Hannah inherited both of her gigaxonin deletion mutations from Lori, and none from Matt. This is a very rare phenomenon called uniparental disomy (UPD), meaning two bodies from one parent. Like Millie, UPD seemingly defies Mendels law of segregation, with a pair of chromosomes (or their parts) coming solely from one parent, rather than one from each parent.

Lori and Hannah Sames (Dr. Wendy Josephs)

UPD happens during meiosis, the cell division that sculpts egg and sperm. And it requires two exceedingly rare events: Two of Loris chromosome 16s ended up in an egg in which Matts chromosome 16 was lost. Hannah essentially inherited her moms mutation twice, without the protection of her fathers normal chromosome 16. This is especially likely with this particular chromosome because an extra copy of #16 trisomy 16 is the most common extra-chromosome condition associated with miscarriage.

Neither Millies Bainbridge-Ropers syndrome nor Hannahs GAN actually counters Mendels law. Although Millie didnt inherit her mutation, if she were able to have children, she would pass it on with a probability of 1 in 2 to each child, just like the law predicts for dominant inheritance. Likewise, a child of Hannah would inherit one copy of the mutation that causes GAN when present in a double dose, just like the law predicts for recessive inheritance.

As I was writing this post, the National Academy of Sciencesreleased its long-awaited tome on whats being called, among other things, embryonic engineering. Rather than banning editing of the human germline forever, the report foresees certain situations in which gene or genome editing, using CRISPR-Cas9 or some other variation on the theme, might be deployed to prevent disease.

WhileI think its great that the rare scenarios in which genome editing might be useful are finally being spelled out, instead of flaming fears of genetic enhancement spawning designer babies, my thinking aboutMillie and Hannah made me wonder why we would ever need to edit a genome to prevent disease in the first place. To quote the eminent mathematician from Jurassic Park, Ian Malcolm, Yeah, yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didnt stop to think if they should.

Preventing illness in a future child of course isnt the same as designing theme park dinosaurs, but like Jurassic Parks technology, I cant imagine why genome editing at very early developmental stages is necessary.Even for an exceedingly rare family situation in which passing on an inherited disease is unavoidable, according to Mendels laws, there are alternatives, although they do not yield a biological child: replace, select, or adopt:

An assisted reproductive technology can replace the sperm (intrauterine insemination) or egg (egg donation or surrogate using her own eggs) of the mutation carrier.

Instead of replacing errant genes early in prenatal development, or even before, I think we should focus on helping the Millies and Hannahs who are no longer fertilized ova or early embryos, but are kids. Thats already starting for Hannah, thanks to the gene therapy technology that has been gestating since 1990. Millies turn hasnt come yet.

So yes, lets set rules for editing the human germline but also consider whether this type of intervention will ever make sense in our overcrowded world.

This article originally appeared on the PLOS DNA Scienceblog under the title Defying Mendelian Genetics and Embryo Engineeringand has been republished with permission from the author.

Ricki Lewis is a long-time science writer with a PhD in genetics. She writes the DNA Science blog at PLOS and contributes regularly to Rare Disease Report and Medscape Medical News. Ricki is the author of the textbook Human Genetics: Concepts and Applications (McGraw-Hill, 12th edition out late summer); The Forever Fix: Gene Therapy and the Boy Who Saved It (St. Martins Press, 2013) and the just-published second edition of Human Genetics: The Basics (Routledge Press, 2017).She teaches Genethics online for the Alden March Bioethics Institute at Albany Medical College and is a genetic counselor at CareNet Medical Group in Schenectady, NY. You can find her at her website or on Twitter at @rickilewis

Read more here:
Weird world of DNA: What's the best way to help patients with genetic diseases that are not inherited? - Genetic Literacy Project

Posted in Human Genetics | Comments Off on Weird world of DNA: What’s the best way to help patients with genetic diseases that are not inherited? – Genetic Literacy Project

The Science and Ethics of Editing Human Embryos – Chicago Tonight | WTTW

Posted: at 7:46 pm

The Science and Ethics of Editing Human Embryos
Chicago Tonight | WTTW
The idea of using this technology to edit human embryos to remove genetic mutations so that embryo can be free of disease is a positive thing, he said. The concern and problem is that if you now do research in that setting and you perfect the ...

Read more:
The Science and Ethics of Editing Human Embryos - Chicago Tonight | WTTW

Posted in Human Genetics | Comments Off on The Science and Ethics of Editing Human Embryos – Chicago Tonight | WTTW

DNA may offer rapid road to Zika vaccine | Science News – Science News

Posted: at 7:46 pm

Last August, scientists injected a potential vaccine for Zika virus into a human being just 3 months after they had decided exactly what molecular recipe to use.

In the world of vaccine development, 3 months from design to injection is warp speed, says vaccine researcher Nelson Michael of the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in Silver Spring, Md. Clinical trials can take years and epidemics can burn out before vaccines make it to doctors shelves. Even vaccine creation is typically sluggish.

But in this case, the vaccine is a bit of DNA, which means scientists can get moving fast. Unlike some traditional methods, DNA vaccines dont use dead or weakened viruses. Instead, they rely on a snippet of genetic material. This naked DNA carries, for example, the blueprints for Zika proteins. Its just a long sequence of DNA blocks.

With DNA vaccines, its easy to move very quickly, says Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in Bethesda, Md. All you need to do is get the right sequence, and Bingo! youre there.

Historically, though, DNA vaccines have been deviled with drawbacks. They work absolutely fantastically in mice, says infectious diseases physician Anna Durbin of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. But they fail miserably when we use them in humans.

Researchers at the infectious diseases institute will soon begin the second phase of human clinical trials for a DNA vaccine candidate for Zika, vaccine clinical researcher Julie Ledgerwood said February 6 in Washington, D.C., at an American Society for Microbiology meeting on biothreats. The virus made headlines last year as it continued its tear through the Americas, and scientists confirmed its link to birth defects, including microcephaly (SN: 12/24/16, p. 19). Ledgerwood hopes to see efficacy data on the vaccine by the end of 2018.

Ultimately, we want a vaccine that can prevent congenital Zika infection, she said. We think the DNA vaccine platform is an opportunity to do things safely and very quickly.

Government researchers arent betting everything on DNA, though, Fauci points out. Weve got multiple shots on goal here, he says. A slew of other vaccine candidates, based on both traditional and new techniques, are also in the works. But the DNA vaccine has stepped up to the plate first, and the world will soon see if it can deliver.

If it works, Durbin says, weve hit a home run.

Making a DNA vaccine is simple, in principle. Scientists synthesize genes from a pathogen, insert them into a circular strand of DNA called a plasmid, make lots of copies and then inject the purified plasmid into a person. You can literally build a DNA vaccine in weeks, says Dan Barouch, an immunologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School. The approach is flexible, too, he adds. Researchers can tinker with the DNA building blocks in the plasmid, adding bits from other viruses that might ultimately enhance the immune response.

Story continues after graphic

For a DNA vaccine against Zika, scientists insert genes for Zika proteins into a circular piece of DNA called a plasmid. Many copies of the plasmid are injected into muscle. Some of the DNA travels into cells nuclei, where it is used to make messenger RNA. After exiting the nucleus, mRNA helps build Zika proteins, which can form viruslike particles that trigger the immune system to make antibodies.

Barouchs team was the first to report a Zika DNA vaccine that offered protection in mice in a study published last June in Nature. Five weeks later, he and colleagues reported in Science that the vaccine, and two others created via different strategies, worked well in monkeys, too. And in September, a team led by government scientists, and including Barouch as a coauthor, came out with two additional DNA vaccine candidates, described in Science.

Its one of those additional candidates, called VRC 5283, that the infectious diseases institute plans to test in a Phase II trial. The trial will help researchers figure out the precise dose and number of injections to use. VRC 5283 includes the blueprints for making two Zika virus proteins, as well as DNA from Japanese encephalitis virus.

When the vaccine is injected into the body, a small amount of DNA makes its way into cells and on into the cell nucleus. There, molecular machinery reads the DNA and writes a message in RNA. When the message leaves the nucleus, it serves as a how-to guide for making Zika proteins. The proteins assemble into viruslike particles that trigger alarm bells in cells, which marshal their defenses. Cells then know the face of the enemy and are ready to fight if Zika invades.

At least, thats the idea. DNA vaccines are hardly a new concept, Barouch says. People have been calling them the vaccines of the future for decades. But they havent yet lived up to the hype.

Scientists have created DNA vaccines for dozens of pathogens, but so far, not one has been licensed for use in humans. One problem is that scientists need massive doses of DNA to provoke an immune response a few milligrams or so. That is a god-awful amount of plasmid DNA, Michael says. Its so much DNA that the liquid of each dose is viscous, he says. Its like syrup.

Naked DNA doesnt readily travel into the nucleus, so scientists dump a lot in the bloodstream to ensure that some winds up inside. The Phase II trial of VRC 5283 will test both four and eight milligrams of DNA, and people will receive three immunizations, each spaced weeks apart, Ledgerwood said. The best dosing regimen then will be used in the second part of the trial a test to see how VRC 5283 performs in thousands of participants in regions likely to see Zika outbreaks.

But even if the vaccine eventually ends up in clinics, ensuring that patients come back for multiple doses wont be easy, says University of Pennsylvania immunologist Drew Weissman. Giving people one shot is hard enough, he says. Giving them two more immunizations is an absolute nightmare.

Weissman and colleagues at the infectious diseases institute and elsewhere are working on a different kind of vaccine that could make multiple doses moot. Like the DNA vaccine for Zika, Weissmans uses genetic material. But instead of DNA, his vaccine relies on modified versions of messenger RNA that how-to guide for making proteins.

Unlike DNA vaccines, those made of messenger RNA dont have to stop in the nucleus first. That makes these vaccines more efficient, Fauci says. The modified Zika RNA vaccine was enough to protect monkeys from the virus five weeks after vaccination, Weissman and colleagues reported online February 2 in Nature. The dose was just 50 micrograms roughly a hundredth as much as a single dose of the DNA vaccine.

On February 17, a different team of researchers reported online in Cell even more RNA vaccines for Zika. The vaccines protected mice from the virus, and some even reduced the severity of a subsequent dengue infection.

Scientists still need to test RNA vaccines in humans to gauge how they stack up against other candidates, Michael says. But the bottom line is this: If a single shot works and lasts a long time, that would be a game changer.

One of the RNA vaccines reported in Cell began a clinical trial in December, but trials for Weissmans vaccine are still 12 to 18 months away. In the meantime, other vaccines are charging forward. The biotech company Inovio Pharmaceuticals, for example, has begun human trials with yet another DNA vaccine for Zika. (It comes with a little zap of electricity, which blasts tiny holes in cell membranes to help DNA slip in, researchers reported November 10 in NPJ Vaccines.)

And Michaels team at Walter Reed has partnered with Sanofi Pasteur on a more traditional approach. Researchers grow vats of virus, kill it, purify it and then use the killed virus in the vaccine. Its the same way Jonas Salk tackled polio in the 1950s. These inactivated virus vaccines are generally very safe, Nelson says, because the virus is as dead as a doornail. Nelson expects data from three Phase I clinical trials for the vaccine, called ZPIV, in early April.

But for a vaccine with both durability and efficacy, Fauci says, the gold standard is a live-attenuated vaccine. Such vaccines, like the one for measles, mumps and rubella, use weakened rather than killed viruses to rile up the immune system.

Its the broadest, best type of protection lifelong, we think, says Durbin, who is part of a team developing a live-attenuated vaccine for Zika. The downside is that scientists have to make sure that the weakened vaccine is harmless. Even then, Durbin says, we would never consider giving a live-attenuated vaccine to a pregnant woman.

When exactly scientists have a working Zika vaccine ready for use is totally dependent on the outbreak situation in South America and Puerto Rico, Fauci says. If new infections dont crop up over the coming spring and summer, scientists may have to wait years to collect the efficacy data needed for vaccine approval.

But the race to make a Zika vaccine probably wont come down to just one winner, he says. Having several kinds of vaccines in play would give public health officials flexibility: more weapons to fight the virus and an opportunity to tailor the response to different populations.

In fact, the fevered quest for a Zika vaccine isnt really a race at all, Barouch says. Were all working together.

Original post:
DNA may offer rapid road to Zika vaccine | Science News - Science News

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on DNA may offer rapid road to Zika vaccine | Science News – Science News

Man Serving 37 Years For Shooting, Homicide Balks At Providing DNA For Another Homicide Case – Hartford Courant

Posted: at 7:46 pm

James Raynor, who is serving 37 years in prison for shooting a man and participating in the gang-related murder of another, is now in the cross hairs of cold case investigators working on another Hartford homicide.

Detectives obtained a search warrant to get a sample of Raynor's DNA for their case.

Raynor, 33, was in court Tuesday because he objected to providing a DNA sample.

His lawyer, J. Patten Brown III, told Hartford Superior Court Judge Julia D. Dewey that his client's position was the state had obtained a DNA sample from him in 2014 and that he feared investigators will get his DNA and put it on the evidence they have.

"He thinks they want to smear his DNA on evidence to frame him," Brown said.

Dewey told Brown and Raynor that the search warrant is a lawful court order to Raynor to provide the DNA. She held him in contempt of court for refusing to provide it, and told him that detectives were authorized to use force to obtain the sample.

In Connecticut, investigators may legally use reasonable force to obtain DNA samples from inmates. The law was upheld by the state Supreme Court in 2016.

Detectives did obtain a sample before Raynor left the courthouse on Tuesday.

Here is the original post:
Man Serving 37 Years For Shooting, Homicide Balks At Providing DNA For Another Homicide Case - Hartford Courant

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Man Serving 37 Years For Shooting, Homicide Balks At Providing DNA For Another Homicide Case – Hartford Courant

DNA from taxidermy specimens explains genetic structure of British and Irish goats – Phys.Org

Posted: at 7:46 pm

February 28, 2017 Male billy goat from a feral herd in Mulranny, Co. Mayo, Ireland. Credit: John Joyce

Intensive selective breeding over the past 200 years and high extinction rates among feral populations has greatly reduced the genetic diversity present in domestic goat breeds. The effect these pressures have had on Irish and British goat populations has been explored in a landmark DNA study that compared modern-day domestic and feral goats with museum specimens from years gone by.

A collaborative team led by geneticists from Trinity College Dublin compared the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of 15 historical taxidermy specimens from Britain and Ireland and nine modern samples taken from Irish dairy and feral populations.

The team has just published their results in the Royal Society journal Biology Letters. Their work provides the first example in which DNA from taxidermy specimens is used to answer questions about livestock genetics.

Lara Cassidy, a researcher from Trinity's School of Genetics and Microbiology, is the first author of the journal article. She said: "There is an amazing wealth of genetic information locked away in taxidermic collections of animals that were - and still are - important for agricultural reasons. As such these collections are invaluable in helping us study the population history of these domesticated animals."

"Studying these specimens and comparing them with modern-day animals also helps to pinpoint existing populations that have retained some of the past genetic diversity, much of which has been lost to industrialized breeding. Retaining this diversity as an option for future breeding is very important, but some of these populations are being pushed to extinction."

The geneticists' study highlights an endangered feral herd living in Mulranny, Co. Mayo, as one such unique population in need of protection. Mulranny goats show a genetic similarity to extinct 'Old Goat' populations that lived on the Isle of Skye in the 1800s. They can therefore be considered among the last remaining 'Old Irish' goats.

The 'Old Goat' populations of Britain and Ireland were once ubiquitous throughout the islands but today have been replaced in agriculture by improved Swiss breeds. The native 'Old Goats' are now only found in small feral herds, whose existence is under constant threat from habitat loss, culling and the ongoing impact of Swiss introgression.

The geneticists sampled a number of different 'Old Goat' herds among the 15 taxidermy specimens. The results showed these goats formed two genetic groupings, distinct from other European breeds. Importantly, all of the modern-day Irish dairy goats fell into a genetic groupings outside these two.

Dr Valeria Mattiangeli, one of the study's lead researchers, said: "This highlights the impact that transportation and mass importation of continental breeds has had on Ireland's goat populations, and underlines how selective breeding for agricultural purposes can impact the genetic diversity of animals."

Sen Carolan of the Old Irish Goat Society, who is a co-author of the journal article, said: "We hope this study will play a key role in saving what was and still is a diminutive creature that is both resilient and charismatic and that represents our cultural and pastoral history."

Explore further: Experiment shows goats capable of recognizing other goats by sight and sound

More information: Capturing goats: Documenting two hundred years of mitochondrial DNA diversity among goat populations from Britain and Ireland, Biology Letters, rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/lookup/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0876

(Phys.org)A small team of researchers with Queen Mary University of London has found that goats are able to recognize their stable mates by both sight and sound. In their paper published in the journal Royal Society Open ...

Nagoya University-based researchers analyze ancient DNA of Neolithic domestic goats to reveal that the goats were introduced into the Southern Caucasus from the Fertile Crescent during the early sixth millennium BC, probably ...

A new strategy of conservation must be adopted if the black rhinoceros is to be saved from extinction, concludes a study involving scientists from Cardiff University.

Higher temperatures caused by global warming could help goat populations to thrive, say scientists.

Geneticists and anthropologists previously suspected that ancient Africans domesticated cattle native to the African continent nearly 10,000 years ago. Now, a team of University of Missouri researchers has completed the genetic ...

The ancestry of domesticated cattle proves more complex than previously thought, reports a paper published today in the open access journal Genome Biology. The first nuclear genome sequence from an ancient wild ox reveals ...

Intensive selective breeding over the past 200 years and high extinction rates among feral populations has greatly reduced the genetic diversity present in domestic goat breeds. The effect these pressures have had on Irish ...

Octopus, cuttlefish and squid are well known in the invertebrate world. With their ink-squirting decoy technique, ability to change colour, bizarre body plan and remarkable intelligence they highlight that lacking a back-bone ...

A University of Florida study shows that mollusk fossils provide a reliable measure of human-driven changes in marine ecosystems and shifts in ocean biodiversity across time and space.

Organic additives found in road salt alternativessuch as those used in the commercial products GeoMelt and Magic Saltact as a fertilizer to aquatic ecosystems, promoting the growth of algae and organisms that eat algae, ...

The Zika virus taking hold of the inner organelles of human liver and neural stem cells has been captured via light and electron microscopy. In Cell Reports on February 28, researchers in Germany show how the African and ...

In the world of fungi, Aspergillus is an industrial superstar. Aspergillus niger, for example, has been used for decades to produce citric acida compound frequently added to foods and pharmaceuticals through fermentation ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Go here to read the rest:
DNA from taxidermy specimens explains genetic structure of British and Irish goats - Phys.Org

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on DNA from taxidermy specimens explains genetic structure of British and Irish goats – Phys.Org

Page 2,015«..1020..2,0142,0152,0162,017..2,0202,030..»