Page 1,916«..1020..1,9151,9161,9171,918..1,9301,940..»

Category Archives: Transhuman News

We Just Created an Artificial Synapse That Can Learn Autonomously – Futurism

Posted: April 10, 2017 at 2:17 am

In Brief A team of researchers has developed artificial synapses that are capable of learning autonomously and can improve how fast artificial neural networks learn. Mimicking the Brain

Developments and advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have been due in large part to technologies that mimic how the human brain works. In the world of information technology, such AI systems are called neural networks. These contain algorithms thatcan be trained, among other things, to imitate how the brain recognizes speech and images. However, running an Artificial Neural Networkconsumes a lot of time and energy.

Now, researchers from the National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS)inThales, the University of Bordeaux in Paris-Sud, and Evry have developed an artificial synapse called a memristordirectly on a chip. It paves the way for intelligent systems that requiredless time and energy to learn, and it can learn autonomously.

In the human brain, synapses work as connections between neurons. The connections are reinforced and learning is improved the more these synapses are are stimulated. The memristor works in a similar fashion. Its made up of a thin ferroelectric layer(which can be spontaneously polarized) that is enclosed between two electrodes. Using voltage pulses, their resistance can be adjusted, like biologicalneurons. The synaptic connection will be strong when resistance is low, and vice-versa. The memristors capacity for learning is based on this adjustable resistance.

AI systems have developed considerably in the past couple of years. Neural networks built with learning algorithms are now capable of performing tasks which synthetic systems previously could not do. For instance, intelligent systems can now compose music, play games and beat human players, or do your taxes. Some can even identify suicidal behavior, or differentiate between what is lawful and what isnt.

This is all thanks to AIs capacity to learn, the only limitation of which is the amount of time and effort it takes to consume the data that serve as its springboard. With the memristor, this learning process can be greatly improved. Work continues on the memristor, particularly on exploring ways to optimize itsfunction. For starters, the researchers have successfully built a physical model to help predict how it functions. Their work is published in the journal Nature Communications.

Soon, we may have AI systems that can learn as well as out brains can or even better.

Continued here:
We Just Created an Artificial Synapse That Can Learn Autonomously - Futurism

Posted in Futurism | Comments Off on We Just Created an Artificial Synapse That Can Learn Autonomously – Futurism

Is neuroscience rediscovering the soul? | Minnesota Public Radio … – Minnesota Public Radio News

Posted: April 7, 2017 at 8:38 pm

The idea that neuroscience is rediscovering the soul is, to most scientists and philosophers, nothing short of outrageous. Of course it is not.

But the widespread, adverse, knee-jerk attitude presupposes the old-fashioned definition of the soul the ethereal, immaterial entity that somehow encapsulates your essence. Surely, this kind of supernatural mumbo-jumbo has no place in modern science. And I agree. The Cartesian separation of body and soul, the res extensa (matter stuff) vs. res cogitans (mind stuff) has long been discarded as untenable in a strictly materialistic description of natural phenomena.

After all, how would something immaterial interact with something material without any exchange of energy? And how would something immaterial whatever that means somehow maintain the essence of who you are beyond your bodily existence?

So, this kind of immaterial soul really presents problems for science, although, as pointed out here recently by Adam Frank, the scientific understanding of matter is not without its challenges.

But what if we revisit the definition of soul, abandoning its canonical meaning as the "spiritual or immaterial part of a human being or animal, regarded as immortal" for something more modern? What if we consider your soul as the sum total of your neurocognitive essence, your very specific brain signature, the unique neuronal connections, synapses, and flow of neurotransmitters that makes you you?

Just as we have unique fingerprints, our brains, their "connectome," are also unique. Surely, all brains are made of the same stuff, but wired in very individual ways. Recall that our brains are plastic, and mold themselves according to environmental and emotional inputs the stories of our lives. To this, we must add our bodies and their relation to our brains. For the mind is embodied, the self not an isolated property of what's inside your cranium but an emergent property of your whole mind-body integration as mapped through the complex highways of nerves interlocking all of you.

Consider, then, the modern soul as the unique neuronal-synaptic signature integrating brain and body through a complex electrochemical flow of neurotransmitters. Each person has one, and they are all different. That is, or can be considered, your essence from a materialist perspective.

Once we have this definition of the soul, the next question is inevitable. Can all this be reduced to information, such as to be replicated or uploaded into other-than-you substrates? That is, can we obtain sufficient information about this brain-body map so as to replicate it in other devices, be they machines or cloned biological replicas of your body? This would be, if technologically possible, the scientific equivalent of reincarnation, or of the long-sought redemption from the flesh an idea that is at least as old as organized religions in the East and West (as Mark O'Donnell remarked in his book To Be a Machine, reviewed here).

Well, depending on who you talk to, this final transcendence of human into information is either around the corner a logical step in our evolution or an impossibility a mad dream of people who can't accept the inevitability of death, the transhumanist crowd.

Silicon Valley is taking very seriously the possibility that aging is a technological problem that can be hacked. For example, the website of Google's company Calico states right upfront that its mission is to tackle "aging, one of life's greatest mysteries." The company's approach is more one of prolonging life than of uploading yourself somewhere else, but in the end the key word that unites the different approaches is information. If life is a code written genetically, it can be dealt with, including the instructions for aging. Another Google company, DeepMind, is bent on cracking AI: "Solve intelligence to make the world a better place." Google is approaching the problem of death from both a genetic and a computational perspective. They clearly complement one another. Google is not alone, of course. There are many other companies working on similar projects and research. The race is on.

What to make of this? It's inevitable that science will be at the forefront of the quest to prolong or upload life. This is not a bad thing, per se, given that the knowledge this research will surely produce will open new pathways to healthier, longer lives. Accepting death is a hard pill to swallow, the hardest. As I wrote elsewhere, referring to my family in this context: "Every day I have to love them is one less day I have to love them."

However, the possibility of extending life indefinitely also raises all sorts of moral and social questions, and possibly a lot of pain and loss. The curse of the immortal is to lose everyone he loves. Unless everyone jumps in. But how reasonable is this assumption? Who will benefit from these technologies? The very wealthy? The select few that have access to them? What of the rest of society? Would we end up creating a dual species of beings, humans and transhuman demi-gods? Would there be mutual tolerance and respect? I can imagine all sorts of sci-fi scenarios unfolding, utopic and dystopic.

Meanwhile, while the quest for immortality continues, what we can do is eat well, exercise, and try to live a life of meaning, leaving the world a better place than how we found it. Or, perhaps, for some in the future, never leaving it at all.

Marcelo Gleiser is a theoretical physicist and writer and a professor of natural philosophy, physics and astronomy at Dartmouth College. He is the director of the Institute for Cross-Disciplinary Engagement at Dartmouth, co-founder of 13.7 and an active promoter of science to the general public. His latest book is The Simple Beauty of the Unexpected: A Natural Philosopher's Quest for Trout and the Meaning of Everything. You can keep up with Marcelo on Facebook and Twitter: @mgleiser

Continue reading here:
Is neuroscience rediscovering the soul? | Minnesota Public Radio ... - Minnesota Public Radio News

Posted in Transhuman News | Comments Off on Is neuroscience rediscovering the soul? | Minnesota Public Radio … – Minnesota Public Radio News

See a lost thermal shield zip ahead of the space station – CNET

Posted: at 8:37 pm

Last week, NASA astronaut Peggy Whitson set a new record for spacewalks by a female astronaut when she and International Space Station commander Shane Kimbrough floated outside the ISS. During the spacewalk, a thermal shield meant to be installed on the station got loose and floated away. Dutch astronomer Marco Langbroek managed to catch an impressive video of the shield cruising ahead of the ISS through space.

Langbroek posted the video on Wednesday. You can see the shield as a small streak of light cutting at an angle across the camera's view. The International Space Station follows its trajectory just under two minutes later and appears as a much larger ball of light.

The shield was one of four intended to protect the station's Tranquility module, which, among other things, houses control systems. The shields offer thermal protection and guard the module from micrometeoroids and debris in orbit. NASA notes the "loss posed no immediate danger to the astronauts."

The European Space Agency highlighted Langbroek's space-debris photography and says the shield should drop from orbit and burn up in Earth's atmosphere within a few months.

"The item poses very little risk to navigation, and an accidental release like this is not unexpected given the complexity and challenges of working outside during a spacewalk," said Holger Krag from the ESA's Space Debris Office.

Does the Mac still matter? Apple execs tell why the MacBook Pro was over four years in the making, and why we should care.

Solving for XX: The industry seeks to overcome outdated ideas about "women in tech."

10

Space cheese and 9 other weird items we've sent into orbit (pictures)

See the original post:
See a lost thermal shield zip ahead of the space station - CNET

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on See a lost thermal shield zip ahead of the space station – CNET

Next Big Future: Lockheed’s Cislunar space station proposal – Next Big Future

Posted: at 8:37 pm

Lockheeds Cislunar space station proposal

Lockheed Martin is studying the capabilities needed to support human pioneering in deep space. Habitats, known formally as exploration augmentation modules, are essential for the exploration of the outer bounds of space.

The habitat will support missions in the proving of deep space exploration, said Bill Pratt, Lockheed Martins program manager for the habitat study. Basically, the habitat would be located just far enough away that astronauts couldnt easily turn around and come home when problems arise. That really forces us to operate in a different mindset thats more akin to a long trip to Mars.

Moving outside of low Earth orbit where the International Space Station (ISS) resides, the habitat would be placed in a lunar orbit to be specified by NASA. Its crew would be more autonomous and less dependent on ground control a more realistic scenario for Mars and other deep space destinations.

Visit link:
Next Big Future: Lockheed's Cislunar space station proposal - Next Big Future

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on Next Big Future: Lockheed’s Cislunar space station proposal – Next Big Future

‘Mars Base Camp’: Lockheed Fleshes Out Red Planet Space Station Plan – Space.com

Posted: at 8:37 pm

THE WOODLANDS, Texas In 2028, a space station could be circling Mars, if a new concept comes to fruition. As a prelude to human expeditions to the planet's surface, researchers aboard the proposed orbiting lab would aim to answer key questions about the complex world.

The six-person Mars Base Camp is led by researchers at aerospace giant Lockheed Martin, who unveiled the concept last year and fleshed out more details of the project here at the 48th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (LPSC), held March 21-25. The Mars Base Camp is designed to vastly amplify the collection of imagery and scientific data from multiple sites on the planet overa full year of crewed occupation.

This work could help identify the best spots for humans to explore on the Martian surface, Lockheed Martin representatives have said. The station's inhabitants could also use virtual reality, immersive technology and artificial intelligence to drive advanced rovers and other craft on the Red Planet in real time. [Mars Base Camp: Lockheed Martin Concept Video]

In addition, samples of rock and soil that robots such as NASA's upcoming 2020 Mars rover collect on the Martian surface could be launched to Mars Base Camp, where crewmembers could examine them for signs of Red Planet life, project team members have said.

Artist's concept of Mars Base Camp, a proposed space station that could be circling the Red Planet by 2028.

Since Lockheed Martin researchers unveiled the project, they have been brainstorming with scientists and engineers from a variety of institutions to refine the idea. Discussions at LPSC continued that work.

"The discussion we're having here at the meeting is, how best can scientific discovery be enabled by having scientists in close proximity to mobile hardware on the surface of Mars or in the Martian atmosphere," Steve Jolly, chief engineer for civil space at Lockheed Martin in Denver, told Space.com.

For example, a human field geologist on Mars would make quick decisions about which spots to explore, the best rock formations to study and where to dig for soil samples, Jolly said. "We want rovers under scientific control to behave in the same way."

Details of Mars Base Camp, a concept led by researchers at Lockheed Martin.

That's not possible when Mars rovers and their handlers are on different planets. one to two days the duties that asaid Ben Clark, chief scientist on the Lockheed Martin team studying the Mars Base Camp.

Moreover, if the rover experiences a problem, there's a wait to find out what went wrong, followed by another wait as the issue is addressed, Clark told Space.com.

Mars Base Camp would minimize such delays, he said.

"We could be operating rovers on the surface in joystick mode from the Mars Base Camp, as opposed to the way we control rovers today," Clark said. [Amazing Mars Photos by NASA's Curiosity Rover (Latest Images)]

Mars Base Camp residents could explore the Red Planet virtually through avatars and other immersive technology, the concept's architects say.

Mars Base Camp astronauts could also interact virtually with Mars surface robots, using technology like that developed at Lockheed Martin's Collaborative Human Immersive Laboratory, Jolly said.

Other high-tech tools could aid surface exploration as well, Jolly added. For example, tiny robots carrying small sensors could crawl down into lava tubes, rappel off cliffs or perform other specific tasks, he said.

In addition, Mars Base Camp would fly in a highly elliptical orbit that would allow it to "hover" over particular spots on the Red Planet for long stretches. During that time period, shifts of astronaut-scientists could execute tasks with surface robots and even aerial drones, Jolly said.

Mars Base Camp astronauts could visit the Martian surface on two-week missions, thanks to a reusable sortie system that employs supersonic retropropulsion.

On the Mars orbiting complex, crewmembers would be immersed in a continuous data flood from the rovers, and they'd have the feeling of being front and center on Mars, Clark said.

"They'll have such good imagery, they'll be able to make decisions as they go," while probing a zone of interest, he said. Mars Base Camp astronauts could cover large distances and even reconstruct, via images, areas in great detail, he said.

Clark foresees the use of avatars electronic "Mars walkers" that are manipulated by a computer user in a virtual space. Those avatars could make up different field-exploration parties that tromp about virtually on the planet, he said.

"Wearing goggles on the Mars Base Camp, researchers can decide where they want to be point to another spot give the right gesture, and you sort of teleport yourself to another place you want to be," Clark said. "Your body didn't move, but the terrain moved to where you want to stand."

Artist's illustration of Mars Base Camp and reusable sortie rockets flying high over the Red Planet.

Jolly stressed that the Mars Base Camp is not a substitute for getting actual boots on the Red Planet.

"It's a precursor," Jolly said, pointing to other aspects of the Mars Base Camp scenario.

For example, Lockheed Martin has looked into developing a reusable sortie system to get astronauts from Mars Base Camp down to the surface and back to orbit again. A single-stage lander and ascent vehicle would enable two-week missions to Mars, with the ability to abort at any time.

Similarly, human excursions to Mars' two moons, Phobos and Deimos, are being assessed.

Indeed, the Mars Base Camp architecture could support a diversity of missions to low-gravity bodies, Earth's moon, Mars and beyond, Jolly said. The Lockheed Martin plan invites international partners to contribute ideas to this human-rated interplanetary exploration system.

"Now is the time to shape the future," Jolly said.

Leonard David is author of "Mars: Our Future on the Red Planet," published by National Geographic. The book is a companion to the National Geographic Channel series "Mars." A longtime writer for Space.com, David has been reporting on the space industry for more than five decades. Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook or Google+. Originally published on Space.com.

Read more here:
'Mars Base Camp': Lockheed Fleshes Out Red Planet Space Station Plan - Space.com

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on ‘Mars Base Camp’: Lockheed Fleshes Out Red Planet Space Station Plan – Space.com

Russia And China May Build A Space Station – Electronics Weekly (blog)

Posted: at 8:37 pm

Now is the time when one needs to make a decision about the ISS, says Andrei Ionin, chief analyst of the Russian Academy of Cosmonautics.

For the time being, we are discussing different options, although one should have done it a lot earlier, adds Ionin, the space station of the future must also be an international project. Such projects need to be discussed long in advance.

The key question here is not about the size of the station or its location in space whether it is going to orbit the Earth or the Moon, concludes Ionian, the key question is about international cooperation. We need to understand who our partners are. All other questions are secondary. Clearly, Russia and China can build such stations, but this is not a question of technologies or finance. Russia solves secondary questions related to modules and their functions. I believe that Russia and China can be very good partners at this point.

A new East-West Space Race is an alarming thought but likely to be a stimulus to the technology industry,

See the original post here:
Russia And China May Build A Space Station - Electronics Weekly (blog)

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on Russia And China May Build A Space Station – Electronics Weekly (blog)

How (and Why) SpaceX Will Colonize Mars – Wait But Why

Posted: at 8:37 pm

This is Part 3 of a four-part series on Elon Musks companies. For an explanation of why this series is happening andhow Musk is involved, start with Part 1.

Pre-Post Note: I started working on this post ten weeks ago. When I started, I neverintended for it to become such an ordeal. But like theTesla post, I decided as I researched that this was A) a supremely important topic that will only become more important in the years to come, and B) something most people dont know nearly enough about.My weeks of research and discussions with Musk and others built me an in-depth, tree-trunk understanding of whats happening in what Im calling The Story of Humans and Spaceone that has totally reframed my mental picture of the future (yet again). And as I planned out what to include in thepost, I wanted to make sure every Wait But Why reader ended up with the same foundation moving forwardbecause with everything thats coming, were gonna need it.So like the Tesla post, this post became a full situation. Even the progress updatesleading upto its publication became a full situation.

Thanks for your patience. I know youd prefer this not to be a site that updates every two months, and I would too. The Tesla and SpaceX posts were special cases, and you can expect a return to more normal-length WBW posts now that theyre done.

About the post itself: There are three main parts. Part 1 provides the context and background, Part 2 explores the Why part of colonizing Mars, and Part 3 digs into the How. To make reading this post as accessible as possible, its broken into five pages, each about the length of a normal WBW post, and you can jump to any part of the post easily by clicking the links in the Table of Contents below.Were alsotrying two new things, both coming in the next couple days:

1) PDF and ebook options:We made a fancy PDF of this post for printing and offline viewing (see a preview here), and an ebook containing the whole four-part Elon Musk series:

There are two versions of the PDF: Normal and G-Rated. The G-Rated version is totally clean and appropriate for all ages. The PDF cost covers both versions.

2) An audio version. You can find an unabridged audio version of the post, read by me, as well as a discussion about the post between Andrew and mehere.

___________

Contents

Part 1: The Story of Humans and Space

Part 2: Musks Mission

Part 3: How to Colonize MarsPhase 1: Figure out how to put things into space Phase 2: Revolutionize the cost of space travel Phase 3: Colonize Mars

A SpaceX Future

2365 AD, Ganymede

One more day untildeparture. It was so surrealto picture actuallybeingthere that she still didnt really believe it would happen. All those things she had always heard aboutbuildings that were constructed hundreds ofyears before the first human set foot on Ganymede;animals the size ofa house; oceans the size of her whole world; tropical beaches; the famous blue sky; thegiant sun thats so close it can burn your skin; and the weirdest partno Jupiterhovering overhead. Having seen it all in so many movies, she felt like she was going tovisit a legendarymovie set. It was too much to think about all at once. For now, she just had to focus on makingsure she had everything she neededand saying goodbye to everyoneit wouldbe a long time before she wouldsee them again

___________

Part 1: The Story of Humans and Space

About six million years ago, a very important female great ape had two children. One of her children would go on to become the common ancestor of all chimpanzees. The other wouldgivebirth to a line that would one day include the entire human race.While the descendants of her first child wouldend up being pretty normal and monkey-ish, as time passed, strange things began to happenwith the lineage of the other.11 click these

Were not quite sure why, but over the next six million years, our ancestral line started to do something no creatures on Earth had ever done beforethey woke up.

It happened slowly and gradually through the thousands of generations the same wayyour brain slowly comes to inthe first few seconds after you rousefrom sleep. But as the clarity increased, our ancestors started to look around and, for the very first time,wonder.

Emerging froma 3.6-billion-year dream, life on Earth had its first questions.

What is this big room were in, and who put us here? What is that bright yellow circle on the ceiling and where does it go every night? Where does the ocean end and what happens when you get there? Where are all the dead people now that theyre not here anymore?

We had discoveredour species great mystery novelWhere Are We?and we wanted to learn how to read it.

As the light of human consciousness grew brighter and brighter, we began to arrive atanswers that seemed to make sense.Maybe we were on top of afloating disk, and maybe that disk was on top of a huge turtle. Maybe the pinpricks of light above us at night are a glimpse into what lies beyond this big roomand maybe thats where we go when we die. Maybe if we can find the place where the ceiling meets the floor, we can poke our heads through and see all the super fun stuff on the other side.2

Around 10,000 years ago,isolated tribes of humans began to merge together and form the first cities. In larger communities, people were able to talk to each other about this mystery novel we had found, comparing notes across tribes and through the generations. As the techniques for learning became more sophisticated and the clues piled up, new discoveries surfaced.

The world was apparently a ball, not a disk. Which meant that the ceiling was actually a larger sphere surrounding us. The sizes ofthe other objects floating out there in the sphere with us, and the distances between them, were vaster than we had ever imagined. And then, something upsetting:

The sun wasnt revolving around us. We were revolving around the sun.

This was asuperunwarm, unfuzzy discovery. Why the hell werent we in the center of things?What did that mean?

Where are we?

The sphere was already unpleasantlybigif we werent in the center of it, were we just on a random ballinside of it, kind of for no apparent reason? Could this really be what was happening?

Scary.

Then things got worse.

It seemed that the pinpricks of light on the edge of the sphere werent what we thought they werethey were other suns like ours. And they were out there floating just like our sunwhich meanswe werent inside of a sphere at all. Not only was our planet not the center of things, even oursunwas just a random dude out there, in the middle of nowhere, surrounded by nothingness.

Scary.

Our sun turned out to be a little piece of something much bigger. A beautiful, vast cloud of billionsof suns. The everything of everything.

At least we had that. Until we realized that it wasnt everything, it was this:

Darkness.

Thebetterour tools and understanding became, the more we could zoom out, and the more we zoomed out, the more things sucked. We were deciphering the pages of Where Are We?at our own peril, and we had deciphered our way right into the knowledgethatwere unbelievably alone, living on a lonely island inside a lonely island inside a lonely island, buried in layers ofisolation, with no one to talk to.

Thats our situation.

In the most recent 1% of our species short existence, we have becomethe first life on Earth to know about the Situationand wevebeen having a collective existential crisis ever since.

You really cant blame us. Imagine not realizing that the universe is a thing andthen realizing the universe is a thing. Its alotto take in.

Most of ushandle itbylivingin a pleasantdelusion,pretending that the only place we live is in an endless land of colors and warmth. Were likethis guy, whos doing everything he possibly can to ignore the Situation:3

And our best friend for this activity? The clearblue sky. The blue sky seems like it was inventedto help humans pretend the Situation doesnt exist, serving as the perfect whimsicalbackdrop to shield us from reality.

Thennighttime happens,and theres the Situation, staring us right in the face.

Oh yeah

This la-di-da oh yeah la-di-da oh yeah merry-go-round of psychosis was, for most of recent history, the extent of our relationship with the Situation.

But in the last 60 years, that relationship has vaulted to a whole new level.DuringWorld War II, missile technology leapt forward,2 and for the first time, a new, mind-blowingconcept was possible

Space travel.

For thousands of years, The Story of Humans and Space had been the story of staring out and wondering. The possibility of peopleleaving our Earth island and venturing out into spaceburst openthe human spirit of adventure.

I imagine a similar feeling in the people of the 15th century, during the Age of Discovery, when we wereworking our way through the world map chapterofWhere Are We?and the notion of cross-ocean voyagesdazzledpeoples imaginations. If you asked a child in 1495 what they wanted to be when they grew up, an ocean explorer would probably have been a common response.

In 1970, if you asked a child the same question, the answer would be, an astronauti.e.a Situation explorer.

WWII advanced the possibility of human space travel, but it was in late 1957, when the Soviets launched the first man-made object into orbit, the adorableSputnik 1, that space travel became thedefining quest of the worlds great powers.

At the time, the Cold War was in full throttle, and the US and Soviets had their measuring sticksout for an internationally-televised penis-measuring contest. With the successful launch of Sputnik, the Soviet penis bolted outby a few centimeters, horrifying the Americans.

To the Soviets, putting a satellite into spacebefore the US was proof that Soviet technology was superior to Americantechnology, which in turn was put forward as proof, for all the world to see, that communism was a system superior to capitalism.

Eight months later,NASA was born.

The Space Race had begun, and NASAs first order of business would be to get a maninto space, and then a man into full orbit, preferably both before the Soviets. The US was not to be shown up again.

In 1959, NASA launched Project Mercury to carry out the mission. They were on the verge of successwhen in April of 1961, the Soviets launched Yuri Gagarin into a full orbit around the Earth, making the first human in space and in orbit a Soviet.

It was time for drastic measures. John F. Kennedys advisors told him that the Soviets had too big a lead for the US to beat them atany near-term achievementsbut that the prospect of a manned moon landing was far enough in the future that the US had a fighting chance to get there first. So Kennedy gave his famous we choose to go to the moon, not because it is easy, but because it is hahhd speech, and directed an outrageous amount of fundingat the mission ($20 billion, or $205 billion in todays dollars).

The result was Project Apollo. Apollos missionwas to land an American on the moonand to do itfirst. The Soviets answered with Soyuz, their own moon program, and the race was on.

As the early phases of Apollo started coming together, Project Mercury finally hit its stride.Just a month after Yuri Gagarin became the first man in space, American astronaut Alan Shepard became the second man in space, completing alittle arc that didnt put him in full orbit but allowed him to give space a high-five at the top of the arc.A few months later, in February of 1962, John Glenn became the first American to orbit the Earth.

The next sevenyears saw 22 US and Soviet manned launches as the superpowers honed their skills and technology. By late 1968, the furiously-sprinting US had more total launches under their belt (17) than the Soviets (10), andtogether, the two nationshad mastered what we call Low Earth Orbit (LEO).

But LEOhadnt really excitedanyonesince the early 60s. Both powers had their sights firmly set on the moon.The Apollo program was making quick leaps, and in December of 1968, the US became the first nation to soar outside of LEO. Apollo 8 made it all the way to the moons orbitandcircled around 10times before returning home safely. The crew, which includedJames Lovell (who a few months laterplayed the role of Tom Hanks on the Apollo 13 mission), shattered the human altitude record and became the first people to see the moon up close, the first to see the dark side of the moon, and the first to see the Earth as a whole planet, snapping this iconicphoto:4

Upon return, the crew became Americas most celebrated heroeswhich I hope they enjoyed for eight months. Three Apollo missions later, in July of 1969, Apollo 11 made Americans Neil Armstrong3and Buzz Aldrin the first humans on the moon, and Armstrong took this famous photo of Aldrin looking all puffy:5

Its hard to fully emphasize what a big deal thiswas. Ever since life on Earth began 3.6 billion years ago, no earthly creature had set foot on any celestialbody other than the Earth. Suddenly, there are Armstrong and Aldrin, bouncing aroundanothersphere, looking up in the sky where themoon is supposed to be and seeing the Earth instead. Insane.

Project Apollo proved to be a smashing success. Not only did Apolloget a man onthe moon before the Soviets, the program sent10 more men to the moon over the next 3.5 years on five other Apollo missions. There were six successful moon trips in seven tries, with the famous exception being Apollo 13, which was safely aborted after an explosion in the oxygen tank.4

The Soviet Soyuz programkept running into technical problems, and it never ended up putting someoneon the moon.

The final Apollo moonwalk took place in late 1972. In only one decade, we had conquered nearby space, and progress was accelerating. If at that time you had asked any American, or any other human, what the coming decadesof space travel would bring, theyd have made big, bold predictions. Many more people on the moon, a permanent moon base, people on Mars, and beyond.

So you can only imagine how surprised theyd be if you told them in 1972, after just watching 12 humans walk on the moon, that 43 years later, in the impossibly futuristic-sounding year 2015, the number of people to set foot on the moonwould still be 12. Or that after leaving Low Earth Orbit in the dust years earlier and using it now as our pre-moon trip parking lot, 2015 would roll around and LEO would be the farthest out humans would ever go.

1972 peoplewould be blown away by our smart phones and our internet, but theyd be just asshocked that we gave up on pushing our boundaries in space.

So what happened? After such a wildlyexciting decade of human space adventure, why did we just stop?

Well, like we foundin the Tesla post, Why did we stop? is the wrong question. Instead, we should ask:

Why were we ever adventurousabout sending humans into space in the first place?

Space travel is unbelievably expensive.National budgets are incredibly tight. The fact is, its kind of surprising that a nation everponied up asizable chunk of itsbudgetfor the sake of adventure and inspiration and pushing our boundaries.

Andthats actually because no nationdidblow their budget for the sake of adventure and inspiration andpushing our boundariestwo nations blew their budgets because of a penislength contest. In the face of internationalembarrassment at a time when everyone was trying to figure out whose economic system was better, the US government agreed to drop the usual rules for a few years to pour whatever resources were necessary on the problem to make sure they won that argument

And once they won it, the contest was over and so were the special rules. And the USwent back to spending money like a normalperson.6

Instead of continuing to push the limitsat all costs, the US and the Soviets got a grip, put their pants back on, shook hands, and started working together like adults on far more practical projects, like setting up a joint space station in LEO.

In the four decades since then, the Story of Humans and Space has again become confined to Earth, where we find ourselves with two primary reasons to interact with space (Note: the next whole chunk of the post isa slight diversion for an overview on satellites, space probes, and space telescopes. If that doesnt excite you, I wont be hurt if you skip down to the International Space Stationsection):

1)Support for Earth Industries

The first and primary reasonhumans have interacted with space since the Apollo program isnt about human interest in space. Its about using space for practical purposes in support of industries on Earthmostly in the form of satellites. The bulk of todays rocket launches into space are simply putting things intoLEOwhose purpose is to lookback down at Earth, not to the great expanses in the other direction.

Heres a little satellite overview:

Satellites Blue Box

We dont think about them that often, but above us are hundreds offlying robots that play a large part in our lives on Earth.In 1957, lonely Sputnik circled the Earth by itself, but today, the worlds of communication, weather forecasting, television, navigation, and aerial photography all rely heavily on satellites, as do many national militaries and government intelligence agencies.

The total market for satellite manufacturing, the launches that carry them to space, and related equipment and services has balloonedfrom $60 billion in 2004 to over $200 billion in 2015.Satellite industry revenue today makes up only 4% of the global telecommunications industry but accounts forover 60% of space industry revenue.7

Heres how the worlds satellites breakdown by role (in 2013):8

Go here to see the original:
How (and Why) SpaceX Will Colonize Mars - Wait But Why

Posted in Mars Colonization | Comments Off on How (and Why) SpaceX Will Colonize Mars – Wait But Why

What Slate Readers Think About the New Space Race – Slate Magazine (blog)

Posted: at 8:36 pm

Throughout March, we published articles about the new space race as part of our ongoing project Futurography, which introduces readers to a new technological or scientific topic each month. Weve covered a range of issues, but were also interested in what you have to say, so weve written up the results of our survey on the topic. Meanwhile, Futurography continues with our April course on the synthetic biology.

There was no universal agreement between readers on the question of what space projects are most exciting. Many enthused about the prospect of getting humans to Mars, while others were more intrigued by sending a lander to Europaand perhaps even searching for life there. Some emphasized targets that are a little closer to home, such as setting up a colony on the surface of the moon. And though most readers took the question seriously, one joked (we hope!) that Sex with green women was the real goal.

Regardless of where were headedor what were trying to do when we get theremost thought that some combination of robotic and crewed missions would be ideal. The robotic exploration of the solar system is an absolute triumph, as is the Hubble. But human travel to space is going to happen, and we should be doing it, one wrote. A few, though, were skeptical, offering opinions such as, What added value do humans in space bring? Humans in space is a circus sideshow. Or, as another put it, we should hold off on human exploration until were ready for serious extra-planetary colonization efforts, since, Just sending people up to orbit the Earth does nothing.

That said, most agreed that efforts like landing a human on Mars had potentially important political ramifications. The first humans on Mars will either be American or Chinese. The political impacts could be large, one proposed. Others suggested that the public enthusiasm drilled up by a major space mission might be the most important element: Without public involvement, the political capital required for an effective space program will evaporate in favor of more immediate terrestrial concerns. But some were concerned that it might be dangerous to let nationalist interests drive efforts in space. One such respondent wrote, Id like to think it could be done apolitically. No one owns the moon; no one should own mars.

Many readers seemed convinced that more economically driven endeavors such as asteroid mining could yield real results. Indeed, one optimistically predicted, Asteroid miners will be the first trillionaires. Others were skeptical, suggesting that it would be decades before we see any real results. Another mused, With the tremendous cost of sending things into deep space, I dont see how we could get a decent return on our investment. And a few worried about the potential risks, asking, for example, What happens if there is a glut of asteroid minerals that crashes the base metals markets to the point that it's no longer profitable to launch rockets to mine asteroids?

Readers were less divided on the question of new countries joining the space race, tending on the whole toward cautious optimism. While a few wrote that it was too early to say which efforts would be most successful, many singled out for praise projects underway in India and the United Arab Emirates. And others argued that it was good for any nation to give it a shot, since new technology is always good for any country. These are very long gestation projects, so returns will take longer, one wrote, and another suggested that they might be most effective as incubators for high-tech engineering knowhow and carriers of national pride. Even some of those who were unsure suggested that it might have merit, as did one who wrote, [I]ts a good thing to get everyone into the picture. Maybe that would be a first step towards a United Earth.

Some of those who felt that less powerful nations shouldnt be investing in space felt that these nations should instead be ceding the field to private companies. Indeed, many wrote that even NASA might need to take a backseat to commercial initiatives, though by-and-large they seemed to think that the future would entail a balance of public and private. Governments have an important role to play in the future of space exploration, but it is a delicate role, one said. Developing on a similar line of reasoning, another argued, In particular, government space programs will provide the framework around which private space companies can build. And as one more reader wrote, [A]ll collaborative efforts are exciting including returning to the moon, going to Mars, and further studying the climatology of the home planet.

This article is part of the new space race installment of Futurography, a series in which Future Tense introduces readers to the technologies that will define tomorrow. Each month, well choose a new technology and break it down. Future Tense is a collaboration among Arizona State University, New America, and Slate.

Link:
What Slate Readers Think About the New Space Race - Slate Magazine (blog)

Posted in Moon Colonization | Comments Off on What Slate Readers Think About the New Space Race – Slate Magazine (blog)

CRISPR crops focused on sustainable farming could soften African … – Genetic Literacy Project

Posted: at 8:36 pm

[Nteranya Sanginga is director general of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture.]

The role of genetic engineering in agriculture and food has generated enormous interest and controversies, with large-scale embrace by some nations and wholesale bans by others.

Many studies have been done and much research remains to be done on the impact genetically modified organisms (GMO) can have on broader food systems.

Fast-moving developments, however, suggest that lines drawn in the sand both for or against the broader use of GMOs risk becoming a distraction, particularly in Africa.

It appears we are on the brink of a deluge of new discoveries many of which may not need the kind of capital-intensive agricultural operations where GMOs were first developed and can instead directly address the needs of smallholders in developing countries and the specific food and nutrition security and climate change challenges they face.

Genome editing can now economically be applied to the crop cultivars that farmers in a given locale prefer, consisting of highly targeted interventions that can address specific challenges, and dont take years of breeding to consolidate.

Its a new world. Lets have a new debate, not the old one.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post:The Challenge Ahead: Harnessing Gene Editing to Sustainable Agriculture

For more background on the Genetic Literacy Project, read GLP on Wikipedia

See original here:
CRISPR crops focused on sustainable farming could soften African ... - Genetic Literacy Project

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on CRISPR crops focused on sustainable farming could soften African … – Genetic Literacy Project

Students present novel concepts at IdeaFest – The Volante

Posted: at 8:36 pm

Students present their research projects during a poster session at the 2017 IdeaFest. This is the 25th year the event has been held. Morgan Matzen / The Volante

IdeaFest, an annual showcase of graduate and undergraduate student research, was held on Wednesday and Thursday for its 25th year at USD.

Wednesdays events included a poster session on the main and secondfloors of the Munster University Center where students posted their work for anyone interestedto interact with and ask questions.

Jeff Beck, a graduate student studying basic biomedical sciences, conducted research on twin genetics.

What we want to do is associate genetic information with that genotypic information that has been collected over time, Beck said. Weve created a microarray which is able to assess the genetic differences between individuals.

Beck said hes interested in research because he gets to see how humans are directly impacted instead ofusinganimal models to study human conditions.

The biggest thing for me is the opportunity of being able to study human genetics, Beck said. It takes out the common argument that a lot of people have against science is using animal models to associate their studies with humans. By studying humans directly, we can directly translate our findings into human conditions.

Sophomore health sciences major Jonni Buckman researched Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) because of a personal connection. She said she joined IdeaFest for her class on diseases.

I did my research on SIDS because my grandma lost a baby to SIDS, and its a curiosity of mine because they still havent found a cause for it, Buckman said. I also chose it because Im Native American, and Native American babies are more likely to have it happen to them than any other race.

First-year Elena Freeman is triple-majoring in international studies, philosophy and French, and she chose to research commonalities in cross-cultural identity. Freeman conducted six interviews with completely different people for her study.

Our main goal was just to find people who were different from each other with as little similarities as possible, she said. We asked very open-ended questions that had to do with identity. We wanted to see through their stories how their experiences were transferred into their identity, and we wanted to see if there were any common themes through all the interviews.

Freeman found that openness was a common, positive trait as well as turning points and environment. She said she plans to make a documentary on the subject.

We found that each one throughout their life was more open to theidentities that theyve had, and each saw that openness was a positive trait in their growth in their identities, Freeman said. They each had turning points in their life where they would find a new aspect of their identity that they wanted to be dominant. Depending on where these people were and where the story took place, they would describe their identities differently.

Brennan Jordan, an Earth sciences associate professor, gave a lecture about Icelands unique geography, ecology and history as the keynote speaker in the MUC ballroom on Thursday.

Jordans research focused on the relationship between volcanoes and plate tectonics. Over the course of his career, Jordan has spent time in Iceland doing research.

Jordan teaches an Iceland Volcanology Field Camp course every summer, where he takes students from across the country to Iceland to study its unique geology and ecology.

In 2012, I started to develop a Volcanology Field Camp, Jordan said. Geologists, as they near the completion of their undergraduate degrees, often do an intensive field course called a geology field camp, and I have taught quite a few of those Including this year, I will have taken 134 students to Iceland over the years.

Jordans lecture, titled Iceland: From an Unsustainable Past to Sustainable Future, focused on Icelands history of sustainability. He explained how earlier in its history Iceland didnt have the sustainable practices its now famous for.

At one point, Jordan said, Iceland had up to 40 percent forest coverage, but deforestation has taken many of the trees. Now, Iceland hasonly about one percent forest coverage.

Iceland, when you encounter it today, you see this stark tree free landscape thats beautiful, but at the time that settlement occurred, it is estimated that 25 to 40 percent was covered by berch forest, Jordan said. Between that time and 1950, the forest dropped to as low as one percent or even half a percent.

Since then, Iceland has adopted many sustainable practices, Jordan said. Now, Iceland makes almost all its power from geothermal and hydro-electric power.

When people talk about Iceland as an example of a sustainable nation, energy is usually first and foremost on their minds, Jordan said. Nearly 100 percent of the electricity generation in Iceland is by renewable methods. Its basically by hydro-electric power and geothermal power.

Jordan ended the lecture with what he called a reality check.He tried to dispelcommon misconceptions about Icelands politics, history and culture.

With the center-right governments pretty pro-business perspective, the environment is pretty much constantly being threatened by new developments, Jordan said. In this sense, its not quite the politically progressive place we might think.

By Morgan Matzen and Clay Conover

comments

Go here to read the rest:
Students present novel concepts at IdeaFest - The Volante

Posted in Human Genetics | Comments Off on Students present novel concepts at IdeaFest – The Volante

Page 1,916«..1020..1,9151,9161,9171,918..1,9301,940..»