Page 1,885«..1020..1,8841,8851,8861,887..1,8901,900..»

Category Archives: Transhuman News

Check Out This Wild Mash-up Between ‘Rick And Morty’ And ‘Friends’ – Konbini US

Posted: April 21, 2017 at 1:59 am

In a universeof infinite possibilities and parallel realities, it is very possible, nay, it is necessary, that an outrageous and politically incorrect adult animated series should clash with the feel-good sitcom of the 1990s.

This seems, in any case, to be the premise behind the creation of YouTube user DandyDani, who came up with an improbable mash-up between Rick and Morty and the credits of uber-famous Friends. Having the two wacky characters invade other series appears to be trendy at the moment, as evidenced by the recent rejig of Better Call Saul.

The theme song, composed by The Rembrandts, starts and a plethora of Rick and Mortycharacters assails the screen, all wearing catchy nicknames. There's the Bad Guy, played by Squanchy the Cat, thenBatman, hiding under Birdperson's feathery headgear and even James Bond, Agent 007, AKAhitman Krombopulos Michael.

Our two heroes end up in catastrophic situations, obviously, while the narrator is struggling to count the number of Ricks present, as there are too many clones of the alcoholic scientist around.Thankfullythough,Rick and Mortymanage to evade Friends' Ugly Naked Guy, who's probably hiding somewhere in the Galactic Federation anyway.

The premiere of season 3 of Rick and Morty was unveiled on April 1, so logically you should soon be able to sip an absinth-based cocktail to celebrate their return. In the meantime, this nutty mash-up will make your day.

Read More ->Tyler, The Creator produced the theme song for Bill Nye's new Netflix show

Link:
Check Out This Wild Mash-up Between 'Rick And Morty' And 'Friends' - Konbini US

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on Check Out This Wild Mash-up Between ‘Rick And Morty’ And ‘Friends’ – Konbini US

REVIEW: Kinky Friedman at Bethlehem’s Godfrey Daniels shows off … – Allentown Morning Call

Posted: at 1:59 am

Singer Kinky Friedman is best known for his biting 1970s songs of social satire, and the sold-out audience at Bethlehems Godfrey Daniels was treated to that during Friedmans concert Wednesday.

But the big surprise was that, between those songs and spates of uproarious, politically incorrect humor in the 85-minute show, Friedman wove wonderful songs that illuminated his 72-year-old life in perfectly traditional country, folk and Americana styles. And also showed how musically gifted Friedman is.

That was especially true of the four songs Friedman played from his upcoming first disc of new material in more than 40 years, Resurrected. Rather than jokey, they were insightful, contemplative commentaries on a waning life.

Me and My Guitar was a study on a musicians life. Saying Goodbye, played as a guitar duo with Joe Cirotti, was a bittersweet rumination on life.

Even the lightheartedly titled new Jesus in Pajamas was, far more than satire, a statement on how to treat the least among us. And Friedman gave it gravitas, with his raspy, slightly gravelly voice.

Friedman, dressed in all black with his signature black cowboy hat, just as he did when he was part of Bob Dylans Rolling Thunder Revue tour or playing on Saturday Night Live in the 1970s, served notice early what the 12-song show would be like.

He opened, solo on acoustic guitar, with a straight-forward reading of Woody Guthries Pretty Boy Floyd itself a stinging commentary on what constitutes an outlaw: Some will rob you with a six-gun, and some with a fountain pen.

And his second song, his 1973 tune Sold American, was equally serious sung soft and sad, with its lesson of fleeting fortunes perhaps even more true today than it was almost 45 years ago.

That and other older songs Friedman did showed how insightful his older songs were. His 1976 song Lady Yesterday was surprisingly sweet and nostalgic probably more applicable to Friedmans present age than the 32-year-old who wrote it all that time ago.

Even a mid-set singsong reading he did, Christmas Card from a Hooker in Minneapolis, while softly accompanied by Cirotti, had a serious streak to its silliness.

All of that is not to say Friedmans show was a dour affair. Quite the opposite, it was consistently laugh-out-loud funny, starting after the second song, when Friedman a famously failed candidate for governor of Texas explained the meaning of politics: Poly, meaning more than one and tics, which are blood-sucking insects.

His between-song jokes were frequent nine minutes of material early in the show and frequently blue, but always with a reserved, intelligent delivery. The more sophisticated the crowd, the better that works, Friedman said. Some of the best were ribald doctor jokes he said were from friend Willie Nelson.

Material suited for general readership included the fact that he connected with Canadian singer Ann Murry who sold 55 million records and loved his new material after she retired. And a stab at evangelicals who use references to Gods will to escape responsibility for good or bad.

In that vein Friedman said he thinks Jesus wants a skinny guy traveling around the country irritating people.

And far from all of Friedmans songs were serious.

He played his politically incorrect even more so today huts Get Your Biscuits in the Oven and Your Buns in the Bed, with an audience member playing kazoo (We should take you on the fking road, he told the man) and They Aint Making Jews Like Jesus Anymore, which he introduced by telling a politically incorrect joke about where the phrase Jesus Loves You isnt comforting.

Political correctness has infested everything, Friedman said. Ive done my part.

His cover of Warren Zevons My Sh-ts Fked Up was as humorous as it was ominous, which is the point of the song.

Friedman even auctioned off bottles of his Man in Black tequila, with other memorabilia, to the audience (he got sales of $350 from three people) with proceeds going to his Utopia Rescue Ranch animal shelter in Texas.

But Friedman regrettably skipped his biggest hit, Ahole from El Paso, his wildly racist parody of Merle Haggards Okie From Muskogee.

And he wound down his show with serious, full-band covers of Johnny Cashs Pickin Time and Tom Paxtons Ramblin Boy, both well done, and his new Zoey, a sweet love song.

And they showed that, for all his talent with humor, Friedman is perhaps even more talented musically.

Here is the original post:
REVIEW: Kinky Friedman at Bethlehem's Godfrey Daniels shows off ... - Allentown Morning Call

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on REVIEW: Kinky Friedman at Bethlehem’s Godfrey Daniels shows off … – Allentown Morning Call

Apple Runs Up Against State Censorship in China, Again – The Mac Observer

Posted: at 1:58 am

Apple is once again running into issues with state censorship in China, according toXinhua. Two different agencies will call Apple into their offices to demand tightercontrols over streaming apps in the App Store.

The move is part of a crackdown on streaming content from three Chinese sites: toutiao.com, huoshanzhibo.com, and huajiao.com. Government regulators said those three sites were offering illegal content, including porn.

Those companies had apps in Apples App Store in China.The Beijing Public Security Bureau and Beijing Cultural Market Administrative Law Enforcement Team want Apple more involved in policing such things.

This is part and parcel of the struggle Apple faces in China. On the one hand, Chinas government is an authoritarian communist government in the hands of a single party very focused on perpetuating the control of that party. Really, thats the other hand, too, but the other hand is highly interested in tamping down the success of western companies in China.

And thus we have Apple forced to shut down its iBooks and movie offerings on iTunes. More recently, Apple was forced to pull The New York Times app from the Chinese app store. China hates the idea of its people getting unfettered access to information.

Apple is far from the first U.S. tech giant to face such pressures. Facebook is banned outright. Microsoft chose to censor Bing to stay in business in China, while Google closed down its China business and redirected Chinese queries to its Hong Kong operation.

The problem for Apple is that these kinds of pressures are bound to increase. The bigger Apple gets, the more interest China has in knocking it down. At the same time, the bigger Apple gets, the more it becomes a pawn in political jousting between China and the U.S.

Its a tricky spot for Apple to be in, to be sure.

Originally posted here:
Apple Runs Up Against State Censorship in China, Again - The Mac Observer

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Apple Runs Up Against State Censorship in China, Again – The Mac Observer

Newseum: Let Us Now Praise Silicon Valley Oligarchs Who Abet Chinese Censorship & Oppose Religious Freedom … – Washington Free Beacon (blog)

Posted: at 1:58 am

Last night the Newseum gave its second annual "free speech award" to Apple CEO Tim Cook. The honor was just one of several "Free Expression" awards that "recognize those who exhibit passion for and dedication to free expression." I can't be the only person who found this ironic.

It was only a few months ago that Apple removed theNew York Times app from the Chinese version of the App Store. "The move limits access to one of the few remaining channels for readers in mainland China to read The Times without resorting to special software," thepaper reported. Nor was this the first time Apple hadaccommodated the communist dictatorship in its quest to deny Chinese readers an independent media. "Apple has previously removed other, less prominent media apps from its China store." When theTimes asked Apple what was going on, the global corporation, with a market cap of some $700 billion, said it was merely complying with the request of the Chinese authorities. Funny:a year earlier Tim Cook had self-righteously refused to comply with an FBI request to unlock the iPhone of the San Bernardino terrorists. Some authorities must be more authoritative than others.

The award illustrates just how perverse an institution the Newseum is.What connection does Tim Cook have to the cause of a free pressother than in suppressing itfor profit? His tenure at Apple has been more about political involvement than technological innovation. He's known foradvocacy of same-sex marriage, hiring former EPA administrator Lisa Jackson, the San Bernardino pose. He doesn't finance newspapers, he has made no standagainst political correctness. I've never heard him utter a word that would offend John Oliver or Trevor Noah, say something that wasn't a clich. "We must be open to alternative points of view, not alternative facts," he said in his acceptance speech. Unless you live in China!

The Newseum is famous for the huge slab of marble that hangs from its facade. On it is engraved the text of the First Amendment.That amendment also guarantees the right to religious liberty, but Cook opposes state religious freedom statutes because they "would allow people to discriminate against their neighbors." That's a tendentious interpretation, to say the least, and Cook has never shown any sign of reckoning honestly with religious believers who disagree with him. So he's 0 for 2.

If the Newseum had presented Cook the "Thank you for using your power to squelch dissident views and bythe way please donate to us award," I wouldn't be making a fuss. Itwould have been consistent. As it stands the museummay want to reconsider itsmotto and swap the First Amendment for Orwell.There are several passages from1984 that would work.

Why did Cook receive this honor? A reader points out that, according to the program, Apple is a "platinum sponsor" of the Newseum's Free Expression awards.

Mystery solved.

Originally posted here:
Newseum: Let Us Now Praise Silicon Valley Oligarchs Who Abet Chinese Censorship & Oppose Religious Freedom ... - Washington Free Beacon (blog)

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Newseum: Let Us Now Praise Silicon Valley Oligarchs Who Abet Chinese Censorship & Oppose Religious Freedom … – Washington Free Beacon (blog)

Council of Europe Warns journalists Self-Censoring Due to Police and Online Intimidation – Breitbart News

Posted: at 1:58 am

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

About 40 percent of 940 journalists interviewed in a three-year study said they had experienced interference in their work serious enough for it to impact their private lives, the council said.

More than two-thirds of those questioned said they had suffered threats of violence, a third cited police intimidation and 53 percent said they were subjected to online harassment, the report by Europes leading human rights monitor said.

It should therefore come as no surprise that the survey found high levels of self-censorship among journalists, the report said.

Many are compelled to tone down controversial stories, or abandon them altogether, the report added, after sounding out reporters from five media associations, including Reporters Without Borders, in member states and non-member Belarus.

The councils secretary general Thorbjoern Jagland called on its 47 member states to fully implement its 2016 recommendation on affording journalists protection and safety in their work to create a climate of open debate and free speech.

Resolve is laudable

The study said that 87 percent of Turkish respondents reported being victims of targeted surveillance by state authorities, public officials or other powerful figures including media owners or advertisers.

The council said many reporters suffered stress, leading to depression or even paranoia. It added that 31 percent toned down a story and that 15 percent abandoned a reporting project altogether, and that 57 percent did not report incidents to police.

But 36 percent said such pressures made them more inclined to resist self-censorship and more determined to pursue their stories.

Their resolve is laudable, the council said.

Freedom of expression is one of the basic conditions for the progress of society. Without safeguards for the safety of journalists there can be no free media.

While conceding that the study was not necessarily representative of its member states as a whole, the council emphasised that the European Convention on Human Rights makes freedom of expression a central means by which power is held to account.

Different forms of violence against journalists have increased significantly over the last decade, the report concluded

Together with impunity for the perpetrators of unwarranted interference on journalists, these are among the most serious challenges facing media freedom today.

View post:
Council of Europe Warns journalists Self-Censoring Due to Police and Online Intimidation - Breitbart News

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Council of Europe Warns journalists Self-Censoring Due to Police and Online Intimidation – Breitbart News

Cameron Smith: Rugby league genius, top bloke – The Roar

Posted: at 1:55 am

Even haters dont hate Cameron Smith. All those keyboard kooks in Twitter Land who get a horn from hating something, anything, and throwing their self-loathing gibber around the e-waves, even those clowns dont hate Cameron Smith.

Smith is universally-regarded: Top Bloke.

Maybe not universally. Theres people would be boo Santa delivering life-saving medicine.

But, in the main, even to those who arent Queenslanders or Storm boys, people nod and look at Cam Smith and think, Cam Smith? Respect.

Old blokes like him because he looks like they looked in the 50s and 60s: tight, sensible. Neither arm full of tattoos. No expensive haircut. He looks like a man should: Military, old school. A man.

Girls like him, too, though they dont fling themselves like hot muffins as they do spunkier boys.

Smith appeals to women more than girls. His is a mans face, a handsome enough mug; shades of Colin Farrell; dark, low eye-brows; prickly three-day growth.

To young men hes the wise and wry wise-cracker, the older bro whod lend you fifty. Dudes arent jealous of him. Unlike some from the fractious, gilded man-youth of his e-generation,

Smith doesnt drink alco-pops, wear flash threads nor squire gimlet-eyed hotties.

Hes a beer man. Schooners of Carlton. Drives a Kingswood. Got a Harley. Top Bloke.

Referees like Smith because he doesnt front them, get big in their faces. Where others (fools) rush in, waving arms, all sweat and spit and indignation, swearing, Waddyafugginmean!? yes, you James Graham Smith just asks a question: Talk us through that one, sir. He barely even tilts an eye-brow.

And the refs, respected, think, Top Bloke, and find him hard to penalise.

People like him because he doesnt look like a roid-engorged monster-man. He looks like a knockabout from your social golf club, a tradesman wholl do you a love-job for a carton. Top Bloke. All-Aussie.

Even when News Ltds papers published television screen shots of several illegal tackles in a State of Origin and the minutes of the match in which they occurred, there wasnt an uproar, especially.

The usual keyboard warriors went at it. A couple of radio jocks opined. But the general sentiment was, well, its State of Origin. There is room for the grubby.

And anyway, its Cam Smith. And hes a Top Bloke. And a great bloody player.

Great? One of the greatest ever, pal.

The marvel of Smith is not his: super-smart work from dummy-half; slick ball-work at the ruck; darting snipes; subtle dummies; soft hands; innate combination with Cooper Cronk and Billy Slater; veritable genius of a left foot; frozen-rope goals; flawless defence; fitness; precision; guile; bravery; strength; leadership; nor winning ways of rugby league.

At least not entirely.

For while those are all fine traits and the mark of a Great Player And Future Immortal, Smiths greatest trick is that he does all this stuff as if hes driving down the shops for milk and bread, laidback like a pot-head in a hammock.

Smith will make 50 tackles and wont have messy hair.

Smiths defence is technically excellent because its always had to be. Since he was a little tacker hes been the same size relative to others. That being an aptly-named the accountant compared to the other mobs blood-gargling Vikings.

But Smith is sinewy strong. Like a tradesman whos been on the tools a decade, he has muscles where they matter. He is hard rather than showy. Hes a nerd not a Julio.

I once shared a Chinese meal with two Raiders giants, Tom Leahroyd-Lars and Dane Tilse. And both admitted to being frightened of running at Smith lest he make them look stupid.

It doesnt mean you dont try, smiled Leahroyd-Lars. You still try to run over him. But hes very hard to shove off.

Like Allan Langer did, Smith can get up and inside the ribs of the giants, inveigle himself, and use the bigger mans weight to hurl him down face first.

Few years ago I was ringside at an Anzac Test in Canberra, the yearly exhibition of Kangaroo dominance over Kiwi.

Smith had his usual game-face on: The Mask. And he was just there, playing, scheming, doing little things perfectly.

A grubber, a show-and-go dummy it was subtle, super-effective stuff. The surgeon thing rings true. He carved the Kiwis and they scarcely even knew it.

He was giving up 20-30 kilos of mobile muscle to the games biggest Vikings in that case ridiculous man-beasts Jared Warea-Hargreaves and Jesse Bromwich and bringing them down, and holding them there, humping dirt.

For another of Smiths greatest tricks is his work on the deck, slowing play-the-ball. A little ankle-tug here, a head move there, a chin-cup. These plays dont hurt his opponent but they do subtly, briefly immobilise them.

And in a game in which ruck speed is crucial, Smiths body-work wins games. As Learoyd-Lahrs said over Mongolian lamb: When hes got you on the ground hes always gaining that extra second.

My mate Matt Hill, an Australian rep judo man, reckon its due to hours of practice at judo and Brazilian Jujitsu.

To manipulate players, to turn them onto their backs and control them, you have to maintain control of the head, says Hill. And Smith knows this.

Hills been thirty years in judo and says he can recognise league players whove been drilled in the dark arts.

Hill reckons were Smith to retire tomorrow he could enter and immediately compete in blue belt Brazilian Jujitsu competition.

A lot of players have Smiths skills. But only the gilded few have all of them all of the time. Smiths greatness and youd wager one day his Immortality is that he pulls them off near-perfectly every game.

Doesnt matter if its Round 4 in Campbelltown or Origin Decider. Smith just plays. Right option, right time.

And hes done it for a decade. Hes the fulcrum in the games three best teams Storm, Queensland, Australia.

Hes the fulcrum of perhaps the games greatest three-prong death squad The Big Three.

Cronk might be credited with more Try Assists and Men-of-Matches.

Slater has scored more long-range tries to the delighted squeals of girls. (My wife calls Slater My Billy.)

But Cronk and Slater do their thing on the back Smiths perfect, soft passes butterflies wafting into waiting hands. Cronk and Slater dont have to think.

And when they do think, they think, Cam Smith. Heck of a player. Top bloke.

See the original post:
Cameron Smith: Rugby league genius, top bloke - The Roar

Posted in Immortality Medicine | Comments Off on Cameron Smith: Rugby league genius, top bloke – The Roar

Kyle Forgit ’18 presents paper on transhumanism at Mind Over Major – The Saint Anselm Crier

Posted: at 1:55 am

Transhumanism is a movement which uses technology to help humans surpass their limitations. Kyle Forgit, a junior English major, presented a paper titled The Problem with Utopia: Socioeconomic Implications of the Transhumanist Movement at Mind Over Major, Saint Anselm Colleges annual interdisciplinary undergraduate conference.

Transhumanism already occurs through gene editing and prosthetics. Forgit argues that these technological advancements are expensive. and a self-aggravating process where the rich will become richer, stronger, and faster while the poor are left behind.

Forgit told The Crier that although innovative and expensive technology does filter down to people in poverty transhumanism will leave lower socioeconomic classes behind the curve. The gulf between the socio economic classes will become even more exaggerated when the rich are able to artificially surpass their biology.

He gave the example of prosthetic limbs, which can cost $5,000 to $50,000 and must be replaced every three to five years. These costs are unaffordable to many people without insurance and certainly the millions of people worldwide living below the poverty line. He states that prosthetics are not a particularly self-aggravating technology because they cannot currently outperform human limbs.

However, the question then becomes: what if prosthetic limbs do become more efficient or powerful than our natural ones? Forgit tells The Crier that this could raise questions about the rights of athletes with these prosthetics.

In his paper, Forgit discussed at length the ethical issues of transhumanism. He quotes Francis Fukuyama: If we start transforming ourselves into something superior, what rights will these enhanced creatures claim? If some move ahead, can any afford not to follow?

Forgit states that in a society where transhumanism is realized lower socioeconomic status also means an objective inferiority in capability; no unenhanced human brain could compete with the calculative might of a cybernetic supercomputer.

He claims that transhumanism is happening whether we want it to or not. To prevent the social injustice of transhumanism could create we need to begin bringing the socioeconomic gap that already exists today. Admitting the complexity of solutions to closing the gap, he suggests the proliferation of transhumanistic technologies such as medical techniques and products.

Forgit claims that in some ways, the eradication of poverty is as much a transhumanistic goal as is the development of a cybernetic super brain. In his medical example, he states that access to modern medicine would cause the human species to flourish. This fits with the goal of transhumanism; the use of technology for humans to enhance themselves beyond biological limits.

Forgit became interested in transhumanism through the works of Arthur C. Clark and the Stuff to Blow Your Mind podcast. He wrote the paper for his Honors Colloquium Science and Society, taught by Dr. Brian Penney from the Department of Biology.

He was one of three students, including Mina Alrais 17 and Courtney Puccio 17, who presented during the Science: Theories and Applications panel at Mind Over Major. Forgit told The Crier that he decided to present at this colloquium because The topic of transhumanism is not commonly discussed in public forums and I wanted to bring attention to its pressing relevance.

See original here:
Kyle Forgit '18 presents paper on transhumanism at Mind Over Major - The Saint Anselm Crier

Posted in Transhumanist | Comments Off on Kyle Forgit ’18 presents paper on transhumanism at Mind Over Major – The Saint Anselm Crier

Immortal Cyborgs: Is This Humanity’s Future? – theTrumpet.com

Posted: at 1:55 am

Transhumanists say we could engineer ourselves to live forever.

Human beings desire eternal life. Since ancient times, they have sought elixirs of life, fountains of youth and other means of escaping death. In a more recent iteration to this quest to live forever, we have turned to science. Some leading biotechnology experts are now predicting that the human body may be obsolete in 60 years as something more long-lasting takes its place.

The movement called transhumanism is now moving from the fringes of science fiction into the academic mainstream. This movement aims to achieve nothing less than transcending the biological constraints on human beings. Its supporters are developing new technologies to enhance human intellectual and physical abilities. Scholars like Prof. Yuval Harari are suggesting that breakthroughs in biotechnology will soon allow humans to upgrade themselves into gods.

Many people are currently debating the scientific plausibility of such revolutionary ideas. Far fewer are seriously considering the moral ramifications. Transcending our biological limitations can only be a good thingright?

Evolutionists often claim there is no omnipotent Creator who designed human beings. For one, why would He create the human body with so many limitations? But what if there is a Creator, what if He designed the human body to be limited for a good reason?

Transcending our biological limitations would take us deep into the unknownand it may be a very dark place.

Utopian Dream

Transhumanism is the belief that the human race can exceed its current physical and mental limitations by using science and technology. The father of the modern transhumanist movement was evolutionary biologist Julian Huxley. In a 1957 essay, New Bottles for New Wine, Huxley claimed that after hundreds of thousands of years of evolution by natural selection, mankind was finally ready to become the managing director of the biggest business of allthe business of evolution. He claimed powerful new technologies were just over the horizon, technologies that would allow the human race to reengineer their own biology and become their own creator.

For decades after Huxley coined the term, many dismissed transhumanism as a fringe idea. But in the 21st century, it is now moving toward the mainstream of futurist thinking in Silicon Valley and other centers of innovation.

Hedge fund manager Joon Yung is now offering $1 million to any scientist who can hack the code of life and genetically engineer humans who can live beyond 120 years. Molecular biologist Cynthia Kenyon has already engineered roundworms that live six times longer than usual. Google has opened an entire division, which includes Kenyon, that is dedicated to reverse engineering the genes that control human life spans.

The chief science officer of the sens Research Foundation, Aubrey de Gray, claims that the first person to live to 1,000 years old has probably already been born.

Other scientists claim that the key to extending longevity isnt necessarily biological, but technological. They have dedicated their lives to inventing mechanical human organs. These organs could be substituted for natural organs, and they themselves could be replaced when they wear out, similar to replacing an automobile alternator every 100,000 miles. The first synthetic trachea, grown from a patients own stem cells, was transplanted into a man with tracheal cancer in 2011. With synthetic tissue growth and 3-D printing technology, scientists say it may soon be difficult to distinguish natural biological organs from manufactured mechanical ones.

The term cyborg was coined in 1960 to describe a fictitious, mechanically enhanced human who could survive in extraterrestrial environments. Fast-forward 57 years. There are now over a million people with mechanical pacemakers regulating their heartbeats.

Devoted disciples of transhumanism foretell a day when our bodies, our brains and the machines around us will merge into a single massive communal intelligence. At the core of transhumanism is the technological singularity. According to computer scientist Ray Kurzweil, this is the hypothetical moment when artificial intelligence will exceed natural human intelligence. Sometime after the singularity, the great transhumanist hope is to be able to upload a human consciousness to a computer. Then, when that computer becomes obsolete, that human consciousness could be transferred to another computer, then to another computer. Biological human bodies with limited life spans would no longer be necessary, and human beings could finally experience immortality.

Dystopian Nightmare

Most people are excited about technologies like the pacemaker, which has saved lives. Yet technologies like stem cell research and genetic engineering have been more controversial. Many are concerned that scientists playing God with human genes could inadvertently create new diseases and/or super viruses. On the other hand, there is concern over what will happen if these scientists are successful. If we get what we want and we liberate ourselves from our current biological constraints, what will happen?

Ironically, Julian Huxleys younger brother Aldous is famous as the author of Brave New World. This dystopian novel warns of a dark side to scientific progress. It describes a future where a totalitarian world state genetically engineers humans to fulfill predetermined roles in a caste system. Aldous did not share his older brothers blind faith in human progress. He feared technology could be misused to bring about unprecedented suffering.

Political philosopher Francis Fukuyama describes transhumanism as perhaps the worlds most dangerous ideology. The first victim of transhumanism might be equality, he wrote for Foreign Policy. The U.S. Declaration of Independence says that all men are created equal, and the most serious political fights in the history of the United States have been over who qualifies as fully human. If we start transforming ourselves into something superior, what rights will these enhanced creatures claim, and what rights will they possess compared to those left behind?

Sir Winston Churchill wrote an essay in 1932, warning of the dangers of technological advancements without moral progress. [I]n a future which our children may live to see, powers will be in the hands of men altogether different from any by which human nature has been molded, he wrote. Explosive forces, energy, materials, machinery will be available upon a scale which can annihilate whole nations. Despotisms and tyrannies will be able to prescribe the lives and even the wishes of their subjects in a manner never known since time began. If to these tremendous and awful powers is added the pitiless sub-human wickedness which we now see embodied in one of the most powerful reigning governments, who shall say that the world itself will not be wrecked, or indeed that it ought not to be wrecked? There are nightmares of the future from which a fortunate collision with some wandering star, reducing the Earth to incandescent gas, might be a merciful deliverance.

What Aldous Huxley, Francis Fukuyama and Winston Churchill feared was human nature. Providing human beings with new tools, new weapons and enhanced bodies does not change how human beings think.

Whether or not it is possible for humans to transcend their biological limitations, just imagine what the world would be like if they did. It would be a world ruled by bionically enhanced superhumanswhose human nature remains profoundly unenhanced. Imagine a world where dictators like Adolf Hitler or Joseph Stalin used their positions of power to take advantage of such enhancementsand lived for 1,000 years. Imagine corrupt governments awarding political lackeys with perpetual youth; power hungry generals deploying super-soldiers to slaughter their enemies. Imagine the rich using their wealth to buy not only more things, but more life. Imagine a world where Aldous Huxleys Brave New World wasnt a dystopian nightmare, but a living reality.

Foundational Choice

Humanitys most serious problems are not biological or technological or even physical in nature. They are spiritual in nature. Human beings can send spaceships to Mars, map the human genome, craft synthetic organs, and unlock the secrets of the atom. But they cannot figure out how to stop wars. They cannot engineer a country, a province or even a city that is free of vice. They cannot do itthey have tried.

In other words, human beings cannot solve evil. In fact, mankinds most powerful technological achievement has been the invention of weapons powerful enough to exterminate all life from Earthhuman, transhuman and otherwise.

Some scientists still hold out hope that human beings will achieve moral perfection on their own, but the grand lesson of human history is that mankind does not know the way to peace, joy and abundant living.

Transhumanists, biologists and scientists in general have no explanation for human nature, what it is, or where it comes from. The Bible offers an explanation that is more than plausible. It says that the Creator of human beings required the first humans to choose a giving, sharing, peaceful way of life or to choose a getting, selfish, violent way of life. They chose the latter.

The Creator designed human beings so that if they chose the selfish, competitive, destructive way of life, they would not have to live eternally in a dystopian nightmare. He created humans to die and return to the dust they were made out of (Genesis 3:19). As Romans 6:23 puts it, the wages of sin is death.

Why did God choose to make man out of physical matter instead of spirit? Herbert W. Armstrong asked in What Science Cant Discover About the Human Mind. If God had made us of spirit, once the decision was made to reject God, we could never have repented. Man, composed of matter, is subject to change. Man, if called by God, can be made to realize that he has sinned, and he can repentchange from his sinturn to Gods way. And once his course is changed, with Gods help he can pursue it. He can grow in spiritual knowledge, develop character, overcome wrong habits, weaknesses and faults.

Human beings simply do not have the capacity to live much beyond 70 or 100 years. They simply do not have the capacity to achieve anything close to moral perfection. They are made out of physical matter. Their physical bodies inevitably wear out and die.

But their physical bodies and their minds also enable them to do something else. They can choose the other way of life. The way that leads not only to a relationship with their Creator, but to the power to achieve nothing less than moral perfection and to the other eventuality listed in Romans 6:23: the gift of God is eternal life.

God made humans out of physical matter so that they could repent and change. He also made humans out of physical matter so that they could die if they refused to repent and change. This is why the omnipotent Creator did not create the human body with more longevity. He created it subject to decay for a very important reason. Man can fight to extend his natural life span, but eventually he has to face the reality not only that he is mortal, but that he is immoral. Those who refuse to repent and turn from sin perishas though they had never been created in the first place (John 3:16; Obadiah 16). But those who repent of their evil pasts and willingly choose to become converted can ultimately receive eternal lifenot in a computer, but as the gift of God.

See more here:
Immortal Cyborgs: Is This Humanity's Future? - theTrumpet.com

Posted in Transhuman | Comments Off on Immortal Cyborgs: Is This Humanity’s Future? – theTrumpet.com

Husband of Regina woman accused of human smuggling arrested along with another Canadian – National Post

Posted: at 1:54 am


National Post
Husband of Regina woman accused of human smuggling arrested along with another Canadian
National Post
Last Friday evening, as Mounties arrested a Saskatchewan woman as part of a human smuggling investigation, U.S. border patrol agents moved in on the woman's husband, a Nigerian citizen and another Canadian on the North Dakota side of the border. So far ...
Canadians, Nigerian Arrested For Human Smuggling At Canada-U.S. BorderHuffington Post Canada
Human smuggling charges laid against Regina womanRegina Leader-Post
Canadian couple arrested as part of human smuggling investigationCBC.ca
South China Morning Post -Cape Breton Post -BBC News -Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada
all 80 news articles »

Continue reading here:
Husband of Regina woman accused of human smuggling arrested along with another Canadian - National Post

Posted in Post Human | Comments Off on Husband of Regina woman accused of human smuggling arrested along with another Canadian – National Post

A protein from human umbilical cords revitalizes memory at least in mice – Washington Post

Posted: at 1:54 am

(iStock)

You leave your car in a vast, crowded parking lot, and when you return, you have no idea where it is. The ensuing search is frustrating, time-consuming and a little embarrassing.

That experience occurs more frequently as we get older, because the functions of the part of the brain that encodes spatial and episodic memories the hippocampus decline with age.

But now neuroscientists at the Stanford University School of Medicine have shown that in mice an infusion of plasma taken from human umbilical cords improves the hippocampus's functioning, resulting in significant gains in memory and cognition needed for tasks such as finding a car in a full parking lot. They also isolated the protein, known as TIMP2, that they say is responsible for the improvements.

The research, published Wednesday in the journal Nature, could one day hold implications for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease and other conditions that erode memory and cognition.

[Giving young blood to older animals raises tantalizing prospects for people]

That TIMP2 protein might have some translational promise, some therapeutic promise, in humans, said Joe Castellano, a postdoctoral researcher who identified the protein among scores of others in the blood.

TIMP2 appears to improve the transmission of information across gaps known as synapses between cells in the hippocampus, Castellano said. The quantity of the substance in the blood declines as people age.

There seems to be something in young human blood that is not in old human blood that can reactivate and rejuvenate these old brains and make mice smarter again, said Tony Wyss-Coray, a professor of neurology at Stanford who led the research team.

The researchers, however, voiced caution because most therapeutic approaches to disease that work in mice or other lab animals do not succeed in humans. And before it could be tried in humans, any substance would face years of safety testing.

But because the current study was conducted with human cord plasma, it is a big step forward, they said. Its not some random molecule that we found somewhere, Wyss-Coray said. Its actually produced in humans.

[Staying fit at 102]

That raises the possibility of using TIMP2 to slow the aging of other tissue in the body, he said. Scientists don't actually know whether different organs age at the same rate and are not sure where the protein is produced. Where does TIMP2 come from? Which organs produce it? Wyss-Coray said. And if its multiple organs, does it change with aging at the same speed, and can we interfere with that?

The researchers had previously shown that they could improve learning and memory in older mice by injecting them with plasma taken from young mice.

In this study, the team injected the plasma the liquid that remains when blood cells are removed into older mice whose immune systems were weakened so that their natural defenses would not attack the proteins.

They could not send the rodents scurrying after tiny vehicles in a miniature parking lot. Instead, they tested them in a maze to determine how long it took the mice to find their way to a dark and confined space they consider secure, Castellano said. The older mice treated with human cord plasma regained about half their speed at finding the correct location, according to Wyss-Coray.

A second test that required the mice to recognize contextual cues to perform a task confirmed the gains, Castellano said.

Excerpt from:
A protein from human umbilical cords revitalizes memory at least in mice - Washington Post

Posted in Post Human | Comments Off on A protein from human umbilical cords revitalizes memory at least in mice – Washington Post

Page 1,885«..1020..1,8841,8851,8861,887..1,8901,900..»