The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Category Archives: Transhuman News
Elon Musk Has Finally Confirmed What the Boring Tunnels He’s Making Are For – Futurism
Posted: May 18, 2017 at 1:42 pm
In BriefWe now have an idea of just what Elon Musk's Boring Company isgoing to be for. Yes, it's to solve traffic, but it looks like itisn't meant just to be your usual tunnel for cars. In a new updatetoday, the company asserts that it's actually building a tunnelthat can also run the Hyperloop. Boring Through Traffic
Serial entrepreneur Elon Musk is ready to conquer space, roads, roofs, and now even tunnels. What started out as a simple musing on Twitter has become a full-blown startup aptly named The Boring Company. Today (May 17), the company added a FAQ pageto their website,which offers an abundance of newinformation about their specific goals.
The most notable announcement that was finally confirmed? The Hyperloop.
The FAQ explains that Musksinitial inspiration was:to solve the problem of soul-destroying traffic. The solution is to go three-dimensional, which could be done using flying cars an idea Musk doesnt think is very viable or to go underground. The other option is to go down and build tunnels, the website states, as these provide a fair amount of perks, including weatherproofing and the practically limitless layers of tunnels that could be builtmuch better than malfunctioning cars potentially plummeting from the sky.
But there is a problem. First, theres the cost. Second, existing tunnels cant support the Hyperloop pods. Musks new company is out to fix this.
Currently, tunnels are really expensive to dig, with some projects costing as much as $1 billion per mile. In order to make a tunnel network feasible, tunneling costs must be reduced by a factor of more than 10, explains the new FAQ.To make the tunnel more cost effective and efficient, its diameter is going to be less than 4 meters (14 feet) whereas normal tunnels (one-lane road tunnels) are usually about 8.5 meters (28 feet) in diameter. To do this, Musks tunnel company would use what it calls an electric sled.
Musks Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) or Godot is ready to start digging the first among these network of tunnels. However, as the TBM isnt even as fast as a snail yet, Musk is determined to find ways to make tunnel digging faster to defeat the snail in a race by increasing the TBMs speed, which will also cut down costs.
So, theres now a place to start digging this tunnel under Los Angeles and a machine to do it. But what is this tunnel really meant for? At first, many thought Musks tunnels would be like every other tunnel except they would be longer and could potentially connect LAX to Culver City, Santa Monica, Westwood and Sherman Oaks, as Musk said in an Instagram post.
However, as mentioned above, more detailshave come to light.
Since the companys introduction, many (including Futurism) have speculated that the tunnels true purpose was to work in tandem with the Hyperloop.This is the real clincher here. It seems like The Boring Company isnt just going to be for cars. The electric skate can transport automobiles, goods, and/or people. And if one adds a vacuum shell, it is now a Hyperloop Pod which can travel at 600+ miles per hour, the site explains.
The Hyperloop is another idea from Musk that is set to revolutionize transportation. It promises to connect individuals around the globe, making long-distance travel both speedy and remarkably affordable.
Initially discussed in 2013, the transport system would use a propulsion based on electromagnetism that could propel pods forward in vacuum-sealed steel tunnel atunprecedented speeds.
Cities in Europe, America, and the Middle East have expressed interest in adopting their own Hyperloop tracks, and study groups are at work making the concept a reality.While he doesnt have a company working directly on Hyperloop technology, Musk has been behind several initiatives to turn it into a reality. Now, with The Boring Company, Musk is building a platform to launch and test the various Hyperloop efforts he helped put into motion.
See the article here:
Elon Musk Has Finally Confirmed What the Boring Tunnels He's Making Are For - Futurism
Posted in Futurism
Comments Off on Elon Musk Has Finally Confirmed What the Boring Tunnels He’s Making Are For – Futurism
Elon Musk: People Skeptical of Autonomous Cars Are Essentially Killing People – Futurism
Posted: at 1:42 pm
Swaying Public Opinion
Since Autopilot was first added to eachTesla vehicle in September 2014, Elon Musks company has continued to improve the already impressive autonomous driving system. Step by step, Autopilots software and hardware have been incrementally advanced. It has learned from human driver behavior, leading to the creation and improvement ofits Auto Lane Change, Autopark, Autosteer, Summon, and Traffic-Aware Cruise Control features. The ultimate goal? Level 5 autonomy, the ability to navigate the roads with zero interaction from a human driver.
More than one million people die in traffic accidents every single year due to human error, and in March, a Morgan Stanley analyst stated that Teslas Model 3 and its Autopilot system may be an order of magnitude safer than every other car on the road. However, many of us humans remain unconvinced when it comes toself-driving cars. Some people fear new technologies generally, while others just see autonomous cars as a potential threat, even when the data stating otherwise is staring them in the face.
According to Musk, human-driven cars are the obvious threat to safe transportation, and every time a critical voice speaks out against the technology, they impede the inevitably safer roads that will follow the widespread adoption of autonomous systems. In 2016, he didnt mince words when he told the press that vocal self-driving vehicle skeptics and members of the press who unfairly focus on the flaws of such systems are essentially killing people.
In 2015, the United Statessaw a 50-year record high in roadway deaths and injuries 38,300 fatalities and 4.4 million injuries, to be exact. Yet a single U.S. crash in a Tesla Model S one being operated improperly, with the human driver watching a movie led to intense scrutiny and an investigation into the system.
Human error causes about 95 percent of all traffic fatalities, and 41 percent of all human error fatalities are caused by recognition errors. According to the Department of Transportation (DOT), those include inattention, distraction, or inadequate surveillance on the part of the driver. Barring outright failure or computational aberration, self-driving vehicles just dont have these problems, and usage of autonomous systems in lieu of human drivers takes these potentially fatal driving flaws out of the equation.
Musk believes that humanitys future includes self-driving cars. How we feel about those autonomous systems wont stop that future from arriving. A continued stubborn preference for a far more dangerous system that we already know without any doubt results in accidents, injuries, and deaths means pain, suffering, and lost money, time, and lives. Maybe its time to listen to Musk and let our best drivers take the wheel for us.
Read the original here:
Elon Musk: People Skeptical of Autonomous Cars Are Essentially Killing People - Futurism
Posted in Futurism
Comments Off on Elon Musk: People Skeptical of Autonomous Cars Are Essentially Killing People – Futurism
A Teen Created the World’s Lightest Satellite & NASA Is Going to Launch It – Futurism
Posted: at 1:42 pm
In Brief A teenager from India recently won a satellite-design competition co-sponsored by NASA. His winning invention, probably the world's lightest satellite, will be launched by NASA this June for a sub-orbital test flight. Tiny Space Cube
Not very many people can claim that theyve sent something they made into space. Oneof those who will soon be sending his own invention a 64-gram (0.14-lb) satellite into sub-orbital flight is an 18-year-old named Rifath Shaarook. His satellite design won a competition hosted by an organization called I Doodle Learning, which issponsored by NASA and the Colorado Space Grant Consortium, called Cubes in Space.
The main challenge was to design an experiment to be flown to space which would fit into a four-meter cube weighing 64 grams, Shaarook told Business Standard. He named his tiny winning satellite the KalamSat, after Indian nuclear scientist and former president, A.P.J. Abdul Kalam.
Its set to embark on a 4-hour sub-orbital mission, launching from NASAs Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia on June 21. We designed it completely from scratch, Shaarooksaid, It will have a new kind of on-board computer and eight indigenous built-in sensors to measure acceleration, rotation, and the magnetosphere of Earth.
Cubes for Space is an example of how NASAs been actively seeking out talents and minds outside of just the agency. NASAs also launching a device developed by another teenager to the ISS, to test space-fairing microbes. Apart from getting helped by young inventors like Shaarook, NASAs also been corrected by a teenager who pointed out an error in some of the agencys data on energy levels.
NASA also has a program called Open Innovation, where it employs the help of the public for outside-the-box thinking about human space exploration challenges. Such crowdsourcing efforts seem to be fruitful for the space agency, and the KalamSat is just one proof.
The KalamSat will spend about 12-minutes in a micro-gravity environment of space, where it will test the durability of its extremely light casing, 3D-printed from reinforced carbon fiber polymer. The main role of the satellite will be to demonstrate the performance of [3D-printed] carbon fiber, Shaarook explained to the Times of India. The success ofthe satellite could lead to the development of similar technology: such lightweight payloads would certainly be morecost-effective for NASA. The space agency is seeking innovative ideasfor payload service, too: back in March, they wrapped up an open call forpayload concepts for a mysterious mission.
See more here:
A Teen Created the World's Lightest Satellite & NASA Is Going to Launch It - Futurism
Posted in Futurism
Comments Off on A Teen Created the World’s Lightest Satellite & NASA Is Going to Launch It – Futurism
NASA’s Worst Plan Yet – National Review
Posted: May 17, 2017 at 1:28 am
At the recent Space Foundation conference held in Colorado Springs, NASA revealed its new plan for human space exploration, superseding the absurd Asteroid Retrieval Mission (ARM) championed by the Obama administration. Amazingly, the space agency has managed to come up with an even dumber idea.
In the early months of the Trump administration, some lunar advocates spread the rumor that the new president would seek a return to the Moon within his first four years, thereby dramatically making America great again in space. That is not the plan.
Nor is the plan to send humans to Mars within eight years, something that I think we could achieve. Nor is it to send human missions to explore near-Earth asteroids, as then President Obama suggested in 2010, nor is it even to send humans to a piece of an asteroid brought back from deep space to lunar orbit for study, as called for in the ARM.
No, instead NASA is proposing to build a space station in lunar orbit. This proposal is notable for requiring a large budget to create an object with no utility whatsoever.
We do not need a lunar-orbiting station to go to the Moon. We do not need such a station to go to Mars. We do not need it to go to near-Earth asteroids. We do not need it to go anywhere. Nor can we accomplish anything in such a station that we cannot do in the Earth-orbiting International Space Station, except to expose human subjects to irradiation a form of medical research for which a number of Nazi doctors were hanged at Nuremberg.
If the goal is to build a Moon base, it should be built on the surface of the Moon. That is where the science is, that is where the shielding material is, and that is where the resources to make propellant and other useful things are to be found. The best place to build it would be at one of the poles, because there are spots at both of the Moons poles where sunlight is accessible all the time, as well as permanently shadowed craters where water ice has accumulated. Such ice could be electrolyzed to make hydrogen-oxygen rocket propellant, to fuel both Earth-return vehicles as well as ballistic hoppers that would provide the bases crew with exploratory access to most of the rest of the Moon. Other places on the Moon might also work as the bases location, because while there is no water in nonpolar latitudes, there is iron oxide. This can be reduced to produce iron and oxygen, with the latter composing 75 percent or more of the most advantageous propellant combinations.
In contrast, there is nothing at all in lunar orbit: nothing to use, nothing to explore, nothing to do. It is true that one could teleoperate rovers on the lunar surface from orbit, but the argument that it is worth the expense of such a station in order to eliminate the two-second time delay involved in directly controlling them from Earth is patently absurd. We are on the verge of having self-driving cars on Earth, for crying out loud, that can handle conditions in New York City and Los Angeles. Theres a lot less traffic on the Moon.
Explaining his winning strategy for war with Austria, Napoleon Bonaparte once said, If you want to take Vienna, take Vienna. Well, if you want to go to the Moon, you should go to the Moon. You dont go 99 percent of the way there and then hang out in orbit where you can do nothing.
So, the question is: If we could put a man on the Moon, why cant we put a man on the Moon?
Heres the answer: During the Apollo program, the NASAs mission-driven human spaceflight program spent money in order to do great things. Now, lacking a mission, it just does things in order to spend a great deal of money.
Why is NASA proposing a lunar-orbiting space station? The answer to that is simple. Its to give its Space Launch System (SLS) and Orion capsule programs something to do. The utility of such activity is not a concern. As a result, nothing useful will be accomplished.
The problem is lack of leadership. From a technical point of view, we are much closer today to sending humans to Mars than we were to sending men to the Moon in 1961, and we were there eight years later. Moreover, we clearly have the technology required to send humans back to the Moon, because we had it half a century ago. So a program of returning to the Moon in four years and reaching Mars in eight is clearly technically feasible. It is also financially feasible. NASAs budget in the 1960s was a larger share of the federal total, but that was because the rest of the budget was much smaller than it is now. In inflation-adjusted terms, the average NASA budget over the 19611973 period was about $21 billion in todays money, only about 10 percent more than the $19 billion the agency will receive in FY 2018. So the funds are there. What is lacking is intelligent direction.
NASA didnt get to the Moon by fishing around for things it could do with stuff created by a random set of constituency-supported programs. It got there by a strong presidential directive to accomplish a mission of importance within a specified period of time. From the mission came the plan. From the plan, came the vehicle designs. From the vehicle designs came the technology-development programs. Thats how it worked, not the reverse. We didnt go to the Moon in order to have something to do with our Lunar Excursion Modules. We developed the LEM in order to go to the Moon.
The American human-spaceflight program is in very bad shape right now. It is operating without a coherent and rational goal, and unless we embrace such a goal and set forth an intelligent plan to achieve it, the drift and waste will only continue until the taxpayers, losing patience, put it out of its misery.
If the current administration wants to make America great again in space, it is going to have to step up to the plate and offer real leadership.
In the beginning was the Word.
Robert Zubrin is the president of Pioneer Energy and the Mars Society and the author of The Case for Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet and Why We Must. The paperback version of his book, Merchants of Despair: Radical Environmentalists, Criminal Pseudoscientists, and the Fatal Cult of Antihumanism was recently published by Encounter Books.
Visit link:
NASA's Worst Plan Yet - National Review
Posted in Space Station
Comments Off on NASA’s Worst Plan Yet – National Review
Buzz Aldrin: U.S. Can No Longer Afford $3.5B a Year International Space Station – PJ Media
Posted: at 1:28 am
WASHINGTON Buzz Aldrin, the second man to walk the moon, said the International Space Station should be retired because it has become too expensive to operate.
NASA currently pays Russia about $70 million per seat for rides to the ISS through 2019.
We must retire the ISS as soon as possible. We simply cannot afford $3.5 billion a year of that cost. We can accomplish the objectives in LEO [Low Earth Orbit] at far less cost with far greater contributions to the future with cycling pathways to occupy Mars using commercial modules, Aldrin said at the Humans to Mars conference last Tuesday in D.C.
Aldrin said the goal is for these modules to operate independently of the ISS.
They should not be in the high inclination orbit of the ISS. I believe these modules should fly at a 30-degree inclination. This will make them much more accessible to cooperation with the Chinese, he said.
Aldrin wants cyclers to eventually replace the ISS in a gradual way.
The foundation of human transportation is the cycler very rugged, so it'll last 30 years or so, no external moving parts, Aldrin said. The cycler is an evolutional spacecraft concept which begins as a commercial low earth orbit cycler, which replaces the ISS in a gradual way. And it evolves to house crew and tourists up and down, and eventually tourists cycling around the moon and back, and eventually going to the moon and staying on the moon for a period of time. This is a bit more mature.
Aldrin estimates that an early version of a commercial low orbit cycler could be tested before President Trumps first term is over in 2020.
I believe we can dispatch a robot two days before a crew leaves and they arrive two days before the robot in 2020. They will be on their way back before the election in 2020. Its not going to be done with the current systems that we have, but if we really want to do something like that it can be done, he said. We need to use the Moon to test our systems and operations for Mars, but we need to be clear that anything we use on the Moon must be testing Mars operations and systems.
Aldrin explained how the cyclers would eventually travel between Earth and Mars.
The key concept of this is we only have to accelerate several small vehicles that we call the cab lander to rendezvous with the Earth-Mars cycler and this will be very light, it only has to supply the crew for a short while before it gets to the Earth-Mars cycler and it requires only an arrow capture heat shield for Mars because its going to rendezvous with the lander that has the heat shield from orbit on down, he said. That arrow capture will also get it back to earth where it arrow captures at Earth somebody comes up and brings them home.
Visit link:
Buzz Aldrin: U.S. Can No Longer Afford $3.5B a Year International Space Station - PJ Media
Posted in Space Station
Comments Off on Buzz Aldrin: U.S. Can No Longer Afford $3.5B a Year International Space Station – PJ Media
Has an actual flying saucer UFO just flown past the Space Station? – Metro
Posted: at 1:28 am
Station. Credit: YouTube/secureteam10
Back in the 50s, aliens used to fly around in flying saucers, and do unspeakable things to victims in lonely places with their probes.
But it seems that saucer-shaped spacecraft may have come back in vogue as an actual, genuine 50s spacship flew past.
Tireless UFO spotter Tyler Glockner from YouTube channel Secure Team said, It can only be described as some sort of flying disc-like shaped UFO, that was spotted hovering in the distance behind the international space station before darting away at a very high rate of speed.
This is one of the most commonly seen and spoken about craft by hundreds and thousands of people over Earth, in space and above the moon.
This thing moves as if it knew the camera was watching it and it was in the frame before it picks up speed before finally shrinking due to the law of perspective before blasting backwards.
Other observers were more sceptical.
Such sightings happen with surprising regularity and NASA has repeatedly said theyre just distortions in the lens, not alien craft parking at the ISS.
Nigel Watson, author of the UFO Investigations Manual says, The constant sightings of UFOs near the ISS are mainly due to reflections and space junk, and it is down to wishful thinking that images sent back from the space station are of alien craft.
See the original post:
Has an actual flying saucer UFO just flown past the Space Station? - Metro
Posted in Space Station
Comments Off on Has an actual flying saucer UFO just flown past the Space Station? – Metro
Reinhardt students speak with International Space Station – Blue Ribbon News
Posted: at 1:28 am
Pictured (L to R): First Row Ryan West, Molly Spivey, Jadon Lyons, Shreeja Gurawale, Juliette Ackerman and Richard Santos; Back Row Caprice McGuckin, Reagan McCampbell, Abigail Bacon, Landry Hoffman, Charlot Cooper, Jack Rice and Carmen Almazan-Briones
(ROCKWALL, TX May 16, 2017) Reinhardt Elementary students recently had the opportunity to speak with Thomas Pesquet, a member of the International Space Station (ISS) for expedition 50/51, about his life in space.
Reinhardt Elementary is one of 12 US schools chosen by ARISS (Amateur Radio on the International Space Station). The students had roughly 10 minutes to ask their questions while the ISS was in range.
One student asked, What happens when you cry in space? Pesquets answer was met with laughs from Reinhardt students. When youre crying in space, your tears just stick to your eyes and form a bubble, said Pesquet. Its really uncomfortable so its best not to cry.
Local Amateur Radio operators in California used their equipment and skills to track the International Space Station (ISS) as it passed overhead.
Our monthly print edition is delivered free to 19,000+ homes in Rockwall and Heath, TX.
To share your good news and events, email editor@BlueRibbonNews.com.
Subscribe to our email newsletter here.
Advertising: 214-342-8000 or advertising@BlueRibbonNews.com.
Continued here:
Reinhardt students speak with International Space Station - Blue Ribbon News
Posted in Space Station
Comments Off on Reinhardt students speak with International Space Station – Blue Ribbon News
Tesla, SpaceX, AI, Mars and more: Is Elon Musk spread too thin? – CBS News
Posted: at 1:28 am
Elon Musk produces electric cars and solar roof panels for the mass market, makes rockets to launch satellites and re-supply the International Space Station, and seeks to build a machine that can read human thoughts. So is he spread too thin as chief of several groundbreaking companies?
That question comes up periodically about Musk, a serial entrepreneur and polymath, especially when his empire achieves yet another high-water mark. Just recently, his electric automaker, Tesla (TSLA), becamethe largest U.S. car companyby stock market valuation, surpassing General Motors (GM). Now valued at almost $53 billion, Tesla has seen its stock surge more than 50 percent over the past 12 months, despite torrents of red ink: a projected loss of $950 million this year, versus GM's expected profit of $6.3 billion.
Play Video
Elon Musk posted a simulation video of his newest project, a high-speed tunnel to help ease traffic in Los Angeles. CBSN's Reena Ninan has the la...
"How can he head three companies?" asked Chicago securities attorney Andrew Stoltmann, a stockholder rights advocate who follows Musk's activities. "Tesla's stock has done well, but what happens when it drops? Shareholders will say he's spread too thin."
The 45-year-old billionaire is also back in the news lately due to his privately held Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX. On Monday night, it launched a re-usable Falcon 9 rocket carrying a communications satellite into orbit. SpaceX, which suffered two launchpad explosion in 2015 and 2016, has an ambitious schedule for 2017, aiming to prove it has recovered. Not only that: Musk wants SpaceX some day to lead the colonization of Mars.
Meanwhile, he formed Neuralink, a company that seeks to implant tiny electrodes into people's brains that will transmit their thoughts to computers. In April, he predicted that this endeavor would eventually allow humans to communicate via telepathy.
Musk is always a dervish of activity. Last year, he merged SolarCity, a solar panel maker that also loses money, into Tesla, a controversial move that critics called a bailout. He also is pursuing ideas like the Hyperloop, an ultra-fast, long-distance transportation scheme, propelling passengers through a tube in capsules. Another potential project is to ferry cars around traffic-congested Los Angeles in high-speed underground tunnels. What's more, he runs an active charity.
Musk's businesses are churning out new products at a rapid pace. Later this year, Tesla plans to deliver its newest sedans and SUVs, and Musk says reservations for them are huge. This summer, SolarCity will begin selling solar roof tiles, which could mark a breakthrough for the sunshine-to-electricity industry, replacing ugly roof panels..
Play Video
Elon Musk, the California billionaire behind Tesla and SpaceX, has unveiled plans to turn the planet next door into a tourist attraction. Carter ...
No wonder that skeptics question how he can keep all the plates spinning. Lawyer Stoltmann points to Jack Dorsey, the CEO of both social media website Twitter (TWTR) and mobile payments services provider Square (SQ), which have had rough spells. Their uninspiring performances prompted some analysts to call on Dorsey to choose one or the other. "Like Dorsey, Musk has too much" to keep track of, Stoltmann said.
Last year, software developer Mark Hibben, writing on theSeeking Alphainvestor site, called for Musk to step down from Tesla management. On a quarterly earnings call with analysts, Hibben wrote, Musk "sounded exhausted." Hibben added that he often "wondered how he could possibly serve as CEO of SpaceX, and Tesla and be chairman of SolarCity. Combined with his various avocations such as Mars colonization and Hyperloop, it all seems too much."
In the most recentTesla earnings call, in early May, Brad Erickson of Pacific Crest Securities asked Musk how, given his plethora of activities, he could manage "staying actively in place at Tesla longer into the future"
Musk replied: "I intend to be actively involved with Tesla for the rest of my life. Hopefully stopping before I get senile."
Often likened to Steve Jobs, and sometimes to Thomas Edison or Henry Ford, Musk is a self-made man who has prospered as an inventor. Actor Robert Downey Jr. turned to him for inspiration when the actor was playing the billionaire Tony Stark, a fictionalized icon of technological innovation, in the "Iron Man" movies.
So how does Musk intend to do it all and keep at it year after year? Musk and his staff would not comment publicly. But he does have an eye for talent, which helps get things done. A person who knows him well said he is ably served by competent lieutenants, particularly J.B. Straubel, co-founder and chief technology officer of Tesla, and Gwynne Shotwell, president of SpaceX.
Play Video
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, tweeted that he visited the Pentagon to talk about a flying metal suit.
To be sure, a large part of Musk's success is his seemingly boundless energy, aided by ample dollops of pluck, intelligence and creativity. After all, he taught himself computing at 10 and sold a video game he created at 12 to a computer magazine for $500. South African-born Musk immigrated to Canada at 17 and then came to the U.S. to attend the University of Pennsylvania, where he earned two bachelors degrees, in physics and economics.
He made his first fortune by selling an online city guide company called Zip2 to Compaq in 1999, and his second as a co-founder of PayPal, cashing out when eBay (EBAY) bought it in 2002. He ranksNo. 80 on the Forbes World's Billionaires list, with an estimated wealth of $15.3 billion.
Of course, it helps that Musk has assistance from Washington and state and local governments in the form of tax breaks, grants and rebates for his technologically oriented companies, which are dedicated to fighting global warming or pushing America into the cosmos. ALos Angeles Timesarticle contended that Tesla, SolarCity and SpaceX will benefit from an estimated $4.9 billion in government support.
By most accounts, Musk thus far has been able to turn in an epic display of multi-tasking because of his:
Non-stop work ethic. This is a man who believes relaxing promotes vulnerability. He once told Business Insider that when "I took a week off, my rocket exploded. The lesson here is don't take a week off." In a TV appearance on Denmark's 21 Sondag program, Musk admitted he's only taken time off twice in 12 years. He typically puts in 90-hour work weeks.
Always intent on keeping a tight schedule, he seems to order his day more by instinct than by regimentation. "I've actually not read any books on time management," Musk told Mashable. At Tesla, he often will inspect vehicles personally as they come off the production line. He has a sleeping bag so he can stay close to the factory floor around the clock.
Play Video
Tesla Motors will reach a major milestone Thursday night when it unveils its first electric car intended for mainstream buyers. The base price of...
"My desk has frequently been in the factory," Musk told Business Insider. "I move my desk around to wherever the most important place is in the company at that time."
Attention to detail. Musk doesn't just inspect a sampling of Teslas. He reportedly eyeballs each of them. He also is a one-man guinea pig, requiring his engineers to install every proposed change on his own Tesla before he okays them for customers.
One story about Musk is that he once discovered the wrong kind of screw was used in Tesla sun visors and said, "they felt like daggers in my eyes." Another pictures him obsessing over the design of a key fob, spending weeks over its dimensions and appearance.
Relentless reading gives him many of his ideas. Dolly Singh, a former SpaceX executive, told Quora that "Elon reads voraciously; he taught himself how to design and build the world's most advanced rockets and spacecraft by reading books."
Nevertheless, despite his hard-driving focus, Musk's career has had its share of glitches. After a succession of successful launches, there were the SpaceX rockets that blew up on the pad over the past two years. And last May, a self-driving Tesla car crashed into a tractor trailer on the highway, killing the Tesla driver and pulling Musk into a public argument over how safe the vehicles are (federal auto-safety regulators later found no defects in its autopilot system).
Riding his subordinates.Author Ashlee Vance, in a book about Musk, writes that his employees both revere and fear him, and try to please him by copying his marathon work habits. Vance writes, "They give up their lives for Musk."
Life with Elon is not always orderly or predictable. In an analysis of Musk's management style, theBoothconsulting firm found: "An engineer might spend nine months working 100 hours a week on something because Musk has pushed him to, and then out of nowhere, Musk will change his mind and scrap the project."
"I have OCD on product-related issues,"he told the Wall Street Journal, meaning obsessive-compulsive disorder. "I always see what's wrong ... I never see what's right. It's not a recipe for happiness."
A self-described SpaceX engineer, writing on Quora, noted: "You can always tell when someone's left an Elon meeting. They're defeated." Over the past year, amid rising pressure from the pending rollout of the next car model, high-level executive departures have rocked Tesla. The chief financial officer, the director of hardware engineering and the human resources head have left.
And in what is now Tesla's energy division, SolarCity co-founder Lyndon Rive announced on Monday that he would be leaving in June to start another company and to spend more time with his family. Rive also is Musk's cousin.
Ability to inspire. A devout science fiction enthusiast, Musk has an ability to instill his vision in employees, customers and investors. What he is selling, as he is fond of saying, is the future.
Play Video
Billionaire Elon Musk shares his vision of the future of technology at Recode's annual Code Conference. NewYorker.com editor and CBS News contrib...
Whether it will come to pass as he predicts, or with him in the forefront, remains to be seen. Wall Street treats Tesla like a technology stock, viewing it as the best bet to dominate electric cars and battery storage.
"Tesla engenders optimism, freedom, defiance and a host of other emotions that, in our view, other companies cannot replicate," analyst Alexander Potter of Piper Jaffray told Bloomberg News.
On paper, GM (10 million vehicles delivered in 2016) should have the advantage over Tesla (80,000). Tesla lags behind GM in bringing out the next-generation electric car: theChevrolet Bolt, introduced in February with a price and range similar to Musk's next entry, the Model 3 sedan, debuting later this year. Trouble is, GM can't match the enthusiasm surrounding Tesla.
It's fair to ask if Musk can wear so many hats. But Jobs was the head of both Apple (AAPL) and Pixar Animation Studios. And Edison led businesses in electricity generation, movies and batteries. Like them, Musk is a dreamer, and maybe his can all come true.
See the article here:
Tesla, SpaceX, AI, Mars and more: Is Elon Musk spread too thin? - CBS News
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on Tesla, SpaceX, AI, Mars and more: Is Elon Musk spread too thin? – CBS News
Why Colonizing Mars Depends on Making Food Taste Better in Space – Thrillist
Posted: at 1:28 am
Y oure on a luxury cruise, sipping an ice-cold beer at one of the half-dozen bars scattered throughout the ship and winding down with friends before dinner. You booked a table for the second seating of the evening at the onboard steakhouse, which is rumored to be superb. You hope to meet the captain.
This cruise-ship scenario may seem mundane, but actually isn't -- because you're in space. And this isn't just any old space cruise; this one's taking you and hundreds of other well-heeled passengers on a six-month journey from a dying Earth to Mars, which you'll call home for the rest of your life.
Roll your eyes, but it's not entirely science fiction. Sure, a high-end space cruise to a colonized Mars is still decades, if not centuries, away. The soonest that NASA projects itll be ready to send its best-trained astronauts to the Red Planet is the 2030s, and even that timeline is ambitious, given the enormous engineering challenges involved with safely transporting people in a vehicle capable of traveling nearly 34 million miles away from Earth.
But fans of the possibilities of deep-space travel should be bullish, especially as NASA outlines concrete plans for its Journey to Mars, and space-tourism companies -- namely Elon Musk's Space X and Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin -- publicly compete to be the first to send paying customers into space.
We're totally going to get there someday soon... if our brains don't betray us first.
Theres no telling exactly how a human brain might glitch out in deep space since no ones been there yet, but something as simple as a prolonged disrupted sleep pattern could trigger a complete mental breakdown. There's also Earth-out-of-view Phenomenon, a term used to describe the human response to watching our Pale Blue Dot grow so small in the distance that it disappears -- a sight that could set off any number of disturbing behavioral responses, from suicidal thoughts to hallucinations or delusions. (To this day, no astronaut has ever lost complete visual contact with Earth.) More likely, good old-fashioned stir craziness would be the culprit.
The Orion spacecraft, which will take the first NASA crew to Mars, allots astronauts only 300 cubic feet of living space. This means that, for up to two years, the four-to-six people aboard will be eating, sleeping, working, and relieving themselves inside a room roughly the size of a large dumpster. Theyll be literally millions of miles away from the rest of humanity, with the threat of imminent disaster and violent death constantly looming -- no fun. That's why NASA provides its astronauts with the comforts of home. What better way to do that than with familiar food and drink?
According to retired US astronaut Clay Anderson -- who's done two separate stints on the International Space Station, totaling more than 150 days -- a home-cooked meal or another emotional crutch during a particularly vulnerable stretch could be the difference between sanity and hysteria in space. "During all those hours, all those days, with crewmates and activities going on around the clock," he said during a panel at SXSW this year, "I could have used a beer every once in awhile."
For a crew headed to Mars to be able to survive, Anderson suggested, theyd need to have access to a variety of food options. "You have to create, in my mind, that home environment, that planetary environment from Earth," he said. "[That sense of] how do I see my family, how do I have the food that has the smells that remind me of home?" In other words, anything but the aroma-less, flavorless meal-replacement granola bars engineered to deliver the necessary calories and nutrients in the smallest possible package that Anderson and other astronauts know all too well.
I ts no secret that most space food is pretty nasty, that oddly delicious freeze-dried astronaut ice cream you bought on field trips to the science museum notwithstanding. Its undoubtedly come a long way since early astronauts were getting by on tubes of goo, but just one look at the space version of a cheeseburger -- essentially a flour tortilla smeared with Cheez Whiz and haphazardly arranged chunks of mystery meat -- is enough to ruin your appetite. Beyond having a years-long shelf life, the food thats engineered on Earth and schlepped into space has to be incredibly light and compact so as not to dramatically interfere with the weight and spatial requirements for launch, hence the reason nearly every meal and beverage in space comes from a flat pouch.
Finding a way to bring enough food to last a crew literally years is a whole different beast than the average space jaunt, which is why NASA is currently developing a variety of nutrient-dense 700-calorie food bars with multi-year shelf lives for the first Mars mission. To their credit, researchers are also considering how a steady diet of dull food bars would affect morale. Yet, if the ultimate goal is to build a habitat on Mars (and keep people sane and comfortable en route), the goal must not be to develop better, more efficient ways to bring pre-prepared food with us, but to find ways to safely and easily cultivate fresh food and drink inside a spacecraft and, ultimately, on the surface of an alien planet.
Growing food on Mars won't be that tough, right? According to Matt Damon's character Mark Watney in the The Martian, all youve got to do is fertilize some Martian soil with your own poop, wait a few weeks, and poof: potatoes! Thanks Hollywood, but its a hell of a lot more complicated than that.
According to Dr. Ray Wheeler, a lead researcher for the Advanced Life Support Research team at NASA whos spent much of his career exploring how to grow crops in deep-space, the best setup for growing fresh food on a spaceship (or elsewhere outside Earths atmosphere) is a hydroponic vertical farm -- essentially a mini-greenhouse decked out with a system of LED lights and tubes circulating nutrient-enriched water. While it's incredibly resource-efficient, it's also limiting in the types of vegetation you can easily grow (you better really like lettuce).
Farming on the surface of Mars would require a protected greenhouse-like environment that optimizes Mars' limited sunlight (it only gets 43% of what we do on Earth). Youll also be growing things there hydroponically, but that begs the question: Where the hell would one get enough water to sustain crops for an entire colony? In theory, we could just bring a bunch of H20 with us and perpetually recycle it, but tacking on heavy tanks of water to a ship for that kind of journey would be incredibly inefficient and remarkably expensive.
A couple of years ago, however, NASA confirmed evidence of water flows on the Martian surface; evidently, the planet's underground ice deposits hold as much water as Lake Superior. Wheelers team considers these discoveries a promising development, but acknowledges that the water will need to be heavily filtered in order to safely hydrate and nourish the plants we bring along. Depending on the eventual scale of the operation, it may be possible to graduate to growing things in actual Martian soil, but only if we figure out a system to remove a certain variety of salts it's known to contain that are highly toxic to humans.
While Wheelers team vetted the plant-growing system that astronauts utilized to successfully harvest lettuce on the International Space Station, which orbits relatively closely at 250 miles above Earths surface, its still unknown how the conditions of deep space might affect botanic life. To that end, these deep-space growing scenarios would only be tenable provided the intergalactic radiation hitting the spaceship and Mars surface doesnt kill or mutate crops in ways that would make everyone sick.
T hough NASA is meal-planning Mars trips and investigating deep-space food solutions, it's understandably less focused on providing a Mars-bound crew with great food than it is with, well, getting them there in the first place. Its ever-slimming budget will soon be going to actually building the rockets, landers, and technology that will bring humans to the Red Planet. And even the future of the International Space Station -- where critical food and crop research is done -- is uncertain beyond 2024, when NASA plans to quit funding it and fully dedicate its resources to its Journey to Mars. Mostly made up of proving ground missions (orbiting the moon and an attempt to redirect an asteroid, among others), this project is meant to test the viability of a longer-duration mission while still remaining in relative proximity to Earth, where a crew could more easily be rescued should equipment or other issues arise. However, the defunding of the ISS may ultimately not lead to the demise of the quest for decent food in space: The government is banking on the commercial sector stepping in to finance the ISS going forward, and companies like Space X and Blue Origin will exploit the existing infrastructure to test their various vehicles and projects.
The hope is that once a handful of companies realize the value in being futurist pioneers, the opportunity will attract others -- including food and drink brands -- to develop better-tasting food that's equipped for space travel, thus pouring money into game-changing research. This proposal is looking more and more promising in light of the recent news that Jeff Bezos will be investing $1 billion into Blue Origin every year with the ultimate goal of making spaceflight inexpensive enough to unleash a new age of entrepreneurship outside Earths atmosphere.
The agency thats been set up to facilitate the ISS transition -- the Center for the Advancement of Science in Space (CASIS) -- has already provided station access for a wide variety of academic and commercial research (think medical trials and hardware tests for the tech industry), and has signaled that it's interested in getting food and drink brands on board, too. In fact, it's recently partnered with Budweiser, which announced an ambitious plan to be the first beer on Mars during this year's SXSW. Its not the first commercial food or drink brand thats teamed up with a space organization to get its product up there (for instance, astronauts tested a Coca-Cola Space Can on the Space Shuttle Challenger in 1985, and Heinz products have long been a part of the standard condiment kit stocked by the ISS), but Budweisers seemingly unconventional partnership marks a first for a major food or drink brand in that the intent is to better understand how its product can be made in space.
Obviously, brewing beer on Mars isnt a high priority in the scheme of things, but the project embodies the opportunities and challenges involved in figuring out how we can integrate the creature comforts that astronaut Anderson considers supremely important on future missions. For one, its a major consumer brand -- one with an annual revenue of $15 billion -- indicating to other major consumer brands that investing in space food and drink research is worthwhile, despite Martian colonization seeming an intangible feat to most of us at this moment. As Val Toothman, Budweisers VP of Marketing Innovation put it: "When we colonize Mars as a human race, we know that people arent just going to be living the bare-bones existence. Theyll want to be able to come home, watch TV, and drink an ice-cold Bud at the end of the day.
Its also entirely plausible that Budweiser's in-space testing -- or any other big brand that partners with CASIS going forward -- leads to improvement of the product down here on Earth. Coca-Cola figured out how to better its consumer packaging by testing a special system for dispensing carbonated beverages in space. If sending the specific barley malt and yeast used in Budweisers recipe into space -- an experiment that's actively being planned -- helps the company develop more hearty or disease-resistant strains of the stuff to grow here, that would likely set off a trend where the Krafts, Campbells, and General Mills of the world start seeing concrete value in testing their products there, and, way down the line, developing space versions of their most popular items to be enjoyed by astronauts and interplanetary tourists alike.
Ensuring a food item or beverage tastes the same in space as it does on Earth actually poses quite a challenge because the body encounters something known as a fluid shift once it leaves the atmosphere and enters microgravity. This not only affects how ones blood flows and causes things like face puffiness, it also messes with sinuses and changes how and what a person can taste. That can mean heightening flavors so they pop as they would on Earth. As Anderson explained, Sometimes astronauts like to have very spicy food, like shrimp cocktail in red sauce. Or they add Tabasco or spicy things like horseradish to their food to make them more presentable to their palate.
This means brands are tasked with figuring out how to make a Bud taste like a Bud or Campbells Tomato Soup taste like Campbells Tomato Soup, and not a diluted or entirely different version.
These may seem like trivial issues to be considering when we're still in a place where public perception of colonizing a new planet seems outlandish, but why not start now when it's a bridge we'll have to cross eventually? These potential partnerships with the ISS will usher in the next phase in the long slog to get humans on Mars. As Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, our own government (the current White House aside), and many other thought leaders of futurism agree, were at the dawn of a new era, where the hot new entrepreneurial trend will be conducting the R&D for the technology necessary to make those jam-packed space cruises -- filled with men, women, and children sent to colonize our next planet -- feel like home.
Sign up here for our daily Thrillist email and subscribe here for our YouTube channelto get your fix of the best in food/drink/fun.
Joe McGauley is a senior writer for Thrillist whos skeptical space jam could ever be as good as Space Jam.
Originally posted here:
Why Colonizing Mars Depends on Making Food Taste Better in Space - Thrillist
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on Why Colonizing Mars Depends on Making Food Taste Better in Space – Thrillist
Colonies On Mars: How Human Faces Will Evolve On The Red Planet – International Business Times
Posted: at 1:28 am
What will the first president of Mars look like? It may not be an alien who wins the inaugural Martian democratic election, but it still could be a person who looks nothing like the humans on Earth.
Although we are still quite a bit away from a full-blown space colony on Mars, not to mention one that becomes an independent nation, space exploration is moving in the colonizationdirection. There are plenty of viable options for a space habitat, including Earths moon and temperate planets in other solar systems, but Mars is usually the main focus of such discussions. And once we are there, its possible the colonists will evolve into a new race of humans, no matter the skin color or other physical characteristics of the pioneers who first settle the Red Planet, scientists say.
Read: Stephen Hawking Says If We Dont Leave Earth Now, Were All Gonna Die
It could take hundreds of thousands or even millions of years for a new species of human to descend from the modern humans we know and love today. But smaller and sometimes superficial changes within the same species, like in the size of a nose, may not take as long to emerge and become dominant. In an interview with International Business Times, John Hawks, an anthropologist and professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said our species has adapted quickly to the diverse environments throughout the world where we live, and he noted that human skin pigmentations have emerged in the last 20,000 years or so.
On Mars, or in another space colony, with an isolated human society, physical characteristics might change randomly as the settlers procreate. But if they can mate with whom they want, it could be that a cultural preference emerges, Hawks said from South Africa, where he is investigating the fossils of a recently discovered extinct human relative, Homo naledi.
A future human space colony, like one on Mars, would live in such a drastically different environment from what can be found on Earth that the settlers evolve into a new race of people. Photo: NASA
Cultural preferences probably played a role in a lot of the different physical features, like varying face shapes, we see in people today, Hawks said. Given enough generations to make babies, the space colonists could end up looking weird and whether theyre weird [to us] or not is a cultural standard for us.
SpaceX CEO Elon Musk is leading the way when it comes to humans touching down on Mars and eventually establishing a colony. The company made history and a huge stride toward sustainable space travel when it successfully landed its Falcon 9 rocket vertically, allowing it to be reusedon future missions. But space agencies around the world are also doing work toward that goal. NASA, for example, has done experiments on farming in microgravityaboard the International Space Station.
Apart from Mars colonists developing their own culture and standards of physical beauty, the different environment could also play a role in the physical features that become dominant in a colony and possibly lead to a new race of humans. Evolutionary biologist Scott Solomon, a professor at Rice University, told IBT that in theory, any trait giving Mars explorers an edge over their compatriots would spread in such an alien environment.
Evolution would proceed more quickly because natural selection will really favor any advantages that some individuals might have, he said.
Read: China Starts Fake Lunar Space Colony
Skin color is just one example of a trait that could prove beneficial.
Mars has a thin atmosphere, meaning radiation from the sun hits harder than it would on Earth, which is protected by its atmospheric cocoon. Without that first line of defense, the skin pigment that helps us on Earth could be even more important on Mars. Solomon, who has written a book called Future Humans about how Earthlings might evolve, said it'sconceivable that on Mars there would be even stronger selection for darker pigmentation and skin color, or for humans to evolve to use different kinds of pigmentation in their skin for more protection from the suns rays.
The speed with which a new skin color emerges would vary depending on just how advantageous it is to have that pigmentation in a Martian environment. If the difference is huge, Solomon said, in relatively few generations, thats going to become a really common trait.
Evolution could occur quickly because the radiation from the sun on the unprotected Mars surface could exponentially increase the number of genetic mutations of each new generation. Stay tuned for more on the Mars mutants we can expect to create.
Link:
Colonies On Mars: How Human Faces Will Evolve On The Red Planet - International Business Times
Posted in Mars Colonization
Comments Off on Colonies On Mars: How Human Faces Will Evolve On The Red Planet – International Business Times