Page 1,720«..1020..1,7191,7201,7211,722..1,7301,740..»

Category Archives: Transhuman News

August Full Moon 2016: See the Lunar ‘Sturgeon’ Tonight

Posted: June 21, 2017 at 3:50 am

The full moon of Augustis shining bright for skywatchers around the world tonight (Aug. 18). In fact, some viewers got a preview of this so-called Full Sturgeon Moon in a webcast last night.

August's Full Sturgeon Moon occured at 5:26 a.m. EDT (0926 GMT) on today, but to the casual observer, the moon will appear full the day before (tonight) and after the lunar event. To celebrate the moon milestone, the online Slooh Community Observatory hosted a free live webcast on the full moon in partnership with "The Old Farmer's Almanac," and you can see it on Slooh.com.

You can also see the August full moon webcast here on Space.com, courtesy of Slooh. [The Full Moon: Why It Happens | Video]

A full moon occurs each month when the sun, Earth and moon line up, with the Earth in between the two. During this time, the Earth-facing side of the moon is completely illuminated by the sun, giving observers on the planet a stunningly bright lunar sight, weather permitting.

August's full moon is known as the Full Sturgeon Moon (among other lunar names) by some Native American tribes because it marks the time when its namesake fish can be most readily caught.

During Slooh's lunar webcast, host Paul Cox discussed the August full moon's many names with Janice Stillman, editor of "The Old Farmer's Almanac."

"Some Native American tribes called the August Moon the 'Sturgeon Moon,' 'Full Green Corn Moon' and the 'Blueberry Moon,'" Slooh representatives wrote in an announcement. "Janice will discuss where these unique names came from, and share some of the legend and lore surrounding those names and traditions."

Cox was also joined in the webcast by Slooh astronomer Bob Berman (who is also astronomy editor for "The Old Farmer's Almanac") "to discuss what causes the full moon, point out some of its interesting features and preview the upcoming series of supermoons which start their arrival this fall," Slooh representatives explained.

August's full moon is also known as the Harvest to the Chinese and the Dispute Moon in Celtic culture. And in the Southern Hemisphere, where it is currently winter, August's full moon has been known as the Snow Moon, Storm Moon, Hunger Moon and Wolf Moon, according to Earthsky.org.

A so-called supermoon occurs when the full moon of a given month coincides with the moon's arrival at perigee, the point in its orbit when it is closest to Earth. During these times, the moon can appear up to 14 percent larger than it appears when it is at its farthest point from Earth. Supermoons, or perigee full moons, will occur on Oct. 16, Nov. 14 and Dec. 14.

During some full moons, the moon aligns directly behind the Earth with respect to the sun, creating a lunar eclipse as it passes through the Earth's shadow. Because the moon's orbit is tilted, this lunar alignment does not occur every month. The next such eclipse will be a minor penumbral lunar eclipse and will occur on Sept. 16.

Editor's note: If you snap an awesome photo of the moon that you'd like to share with Space.com and our news partners for a potential story or gallery, send images and comments in to managing editor Tariq Malik at spacephotos@space.com.

Email Tariq Malik at tmalik@space.com or follow him@tariqjmalikandGoogle+.Follow us@Spacedotcom,FacebookandGoogle+. Original article onSpace.com.

See the original post:
August Full Moon 2016: See the Lunar 'Sturgeon' Tonight

Posted in Moon Colonization | Comments Off on August Full Moon 2016: See the Lunar ‘Sturgeon’ Tonight

Stephen Hawking: Humans Should Ride a Beam of Light to Other Planets – Live Science

Posted: at 3:50 am

Stephen Hawking has a long list of warnings about threats to humanity.

Humanity should focus its efforts on exploring other worlds that we might inhabit, and to get there, Earthlings may need to ride on a beam of light, famed physicist Stephen Hawking says.

Hawking made his remarks today (June 20) at Starmus, an arts and science festival in Norway whose advisory board he sits on. In his speech, he reiterated his belief that humans need to explore space to avoid the dangers of our own finite world. And then he described how humans could one day travel on a beam of light, harnessing the power of Einstein's theory of relativity to reach mind-bogglingly distant planets. [8 Shocking Things We Learned from Stephen Hawking's Book]

The human imagination has led us to peer ever deeper into the universe with scientific tools, Hawking said. Yet despite this ability to investigate the most distant reaches of the universe without leaving our backyards, humans shouldn't be content with this sedentary approach.

"Shouldn't we be content to be cosmic sloths, enjoying the universe from the comfort of Earth? The answer is, no," Hawking said in his address. "The Earth is under threat from so many areas that it is difficult for me to be positive."

What's more, humans are naturally curious explorers who are driven to push into the unknown. Hawking described the looming threats of a too-crowded world facing climate change, the collapse of animal species and the draining of physical resources. (Hawking has previously mentioned his conviction that humanity is doomed in the next millennium unless people can come up with an escape plan.)

"When we have reached similar crises in our history, there has usually been somewhere else to colonize. Columbus did it in 1492 when he discovered the New World. But now there is no new world. No Utopia around the corner," Hawking said.

The easiest targets are the places closest to home: the moon and Mars, Hawking said in his Starmus address. The moon is nearby, but it's small, has no liquid water and lacks a magnetic field to shield people from radiation. Mars may once have had liquid water and an atmosphere, but no longer.

But an even more promising idea is to explore some of the planets in the vicinity of our nearest stellar neighbor, Proxima Centauri, at a distance of about 4.5 light-years from Earth, where 1 light-year is nearly 6 trillion miles (10 million kilometers). A planet circling Proxima Centauri, called Proxima Centauri b, may be somewhat similar to Earth, at least in a few respects, Hawking said.

However, we'll never know how hospitable Proxima b is unless we can get there. At current speeds, using chemical propulsion, it would take 3 million years to reach the exoplanet, Hawking said. [Interstellar Space Travel: 7 Futuristic Spacecraft to Explore the Cosmos]

Thus, space colonization requires a radical departure in our travel technology.

"To go faster would require a much higher exhaust speed than chemical rockets can provide that of light itself," Hawking said. "A powerful beam of light from the rear could drive the spaceship forward. Nuclear fusion could provide 1 percent of the spaceship's mass energy, which would accelerate it to a tenth of the speed of light."

Going faster than that would require harnessing matter-antimatter annihilation or as-yet-undreamed-of technology, he added. (When matter and antimatter come into contact, they annihilate, releasing gobs of energy.)

To bring these seeming pipe dreams closer to reality, Hawking, along with physicist and billionaire Yuri Milner, has founded a company called Breakthrough Starshot, which aims to make interstellar travel a reality. As an early prototype, the team is creating a teensy space probe, just a few centimeters wide, attached to a miniscule light sail. The plan is to send 1,000 of these "StarChips" and their sails into the void, with arrays of lasers uniting to form one powerful light beam to propel the tiny sails with gigawatts of power, Hawking said.

The energy imparted to the tiny space probes could zoom them to speeds reaching about 100 million mph (160 million km/h), which would mean they would reach Mars in a day (as opposed to 260 days using propulsion). At one-fifth the speed of light, the probes would reach Alpha Centauri in just 20 years and send images of any possible planets back on another light beam, Hawking said. Another physicist, Claudius Gros has proposed using these tiny space explorers to colonize far-flung planets with a biosphere of unicellular organisms, Hawking said

"Human colonization on other planets is no longer science fiction. It can be science fact. The human race has existed as a separate species for about 2 million years. Civilization began about 10,000 years ago, and the rate of development has been steadily increasing. If humanity is to continue for another million years, our future lies in boldly going where no one else has gone before," Hawking said.

Originally published on Live Science.

More:
Stephen Hawking: Humans Should Ride a Beam of Light to Other Planets - Live Science

Posted in Moon Colonization | Comments Off on Stephen Hawking: Humans Should Ride a Beam of Light to Other Planets – Live Science

MUSKWATCH: Russian Billionaire Wants to Colonize Space with … – Nerdist

Posted: at 3:50 am

We here at Muskwatch have been appalled over the last few weeks who the heck are all these people who just think they can keep stepping on Elon Musks Tesla-touching toes? Jeff Bezos wants to beat Elon to the Moon, NASA wants to conquer the Sun before SpaceX can get therethe gall. And now, a Russian billionaire by the name of Igor Ashurbeyli wants to create a space-faring nation called Asgardia before Elon can realize colony on Mars? We just wont have it.

Time for MUSKWATCH.

The space-nation of Asgardia was founded in 2016 but will have its first launch later this year. What will it be launching you ask? A ship? A habitat? No, a dang 512-GB hard drvie, and thats it. Nice. Have to try a little harder next time to beat our future dad.

Also on the show: Elon lays out his plans for Martian colonization (way cooler than just a Russian hard drive orbiting Earth pfft), car company Audi is gunning hard for Teslas cornership of the sexy electric car market, and we share our thoughts on who should play Elon in the movie currently floating around Hollywood: The Man From Tomorrow.

Muskwatchairson Nerdist.com and YouTube everyTuesday,but you can hack the planet and watch it two full days earlier onSunday if youre anAlpha subscriber. Find out how you can get 30 days free (and be 48 hours smarter than your dumb friends) right here.

What do you think of this weeks top stories? What else would you like to see us discuss onMuskwatch? Let us know in the comments below!

Read the original here:
MUSKWATCH: Russian Billionaire Wants to Colonize Space with ... - Nerdist

Posted in Moon Colonization | Comments Off on MUSKWATCH: Russian Billionaire Wants to Colonize Space with … – Nerdist

‘Food Evolution’ movie could mark turning point in public GMO discussion – Genetic Literacy Project

Posted: at 3:50 am

Last year a Pew Research poll gauged public sentiment toward genetic engineering of food crops (familiarly, GMO). The results showed that while the public is consumed with fear and suspicion, scientists view the technology as safe and effective.

This divide may be due to the deep presence of non-scientific websites, books and films that abandon science to perpetuate a popular and profitable myth. Fear is their main vehicle. For anti-corporate reasons or simply to promote high-priced, lifestyle-based food products, there are many that create hyperbole and disparaging imagery around the science of genetic engineering. Many opposed to the technology are only experts at producing media targeted to tarnish the favorable applications of these helpful technologies.

Non-scientific media dominates the media. From alarmist pseudo-documentaries like Food Inc. and GMO OMG, to the scientifically painful inept fiction Consumed, media in this space are designed to shock and scare, knowingly at the expense of scientifically precise information. There have been few artistically-driven Hollywood efforts to speak up for the science, telling the evidence-based story to the majority of consumers that simply want to enjoy safe and affordable food produced sustainably.

[Editors Note: Stacy Malkan, co-director of USRight to Know, offers an opposing take on the movie here.]

But this trend is changing with a new series of scientific documentaries. The first film is Food Evolution, directed by Scott Hamilton Kennedy. The documentary examines the issues by taking a close-and-personal look at several global agricultural situations, the personalities involved, the successes, and most painfully, the damaging consequences of our failure to deploy useful technology that can help those in need. Food Evolution conveys a scientific story with imagery, humanity and compassion that scientists never could alone. The film is narrated by Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson, adding his gravitas to this important topic.

The film centers on political and field situations in Hawaii, Uganda, and other locations throughout the world. The central players are the scientists that understand and share the benefits of these technologies. Scientists like Drs. Alison Van Eenennaam, Dennis Gonsalves, Pamela Ronald and Leena Tripathi, along with former anti-biotech activist and author Mark Lynas, carry the film as a vehicle that takes them through their discussions of the science and their interactions with the public and farmers.

But the film also provides enough rope to the charlatans that pollute a scientific discourse with manufactured fear. Prominent among them is Jeffery Smith, an author and film producer opposed to biotechnology. The film shows how he manipulates language, makes claims, and tweaks the emotions of concerned people to sell his science-challenged message. It exposes the for-profit misgivings of the Food Babe Vani Hari, and the ideologically-charged anti-corporatism of other leaders in an anti-GMO movement that seeks to end the use of biotechnology- even if it hurts those in need. These are the most important aspects of the film because they expose how a cadre of non-experts is willing to bastardize science, and sacrifice progress and people for ideology and profit.

But the real stars of the show are a papaya, a banana, and the people that need them. Their story is shown with stunning imagery and emotion-evoking vignettes that encapsulate the frustrations we feel as scientists with solutions stalled by activist fear-mongering.

Ive seen the film several times, and each time Ive lost tears. As a scientist, it is painful to relive how safe and effective solutions that can change the lives of people and help our planetbut their use is restricted because of well-financed and coordinated misinformation and fear campaigns.

The beauty of Food Evolution is that it will benchmark a time when public sentiment was changing to support a pro-science message. For twenty years we have been told of horrors that never materialized. We have watched products intended to serve humanity languish in public laboratories because of affluent-nation fears. We have witnessed approval of scientifically-baseless legislation restrict choices for farmers. Weve observed the internets profiteers tour the planet and reap personal wealth while lying to the public about science.

But even before the film has been presented in wide release, news of this film has prompted a typical and expected response from anti-biotech activists. They are shouting the tired claims that this is a Monsanto-financed propaganda flick and that nobody should trust it.

Watch for yourself and determine who is lying to you. Is it the politicians, celebrities and scaremongers, or the public, government and company scientists that have dedicated their lives to developing technology to solve problems for people and planet? This film answers that question in remarkable clarity.

Finally, high congratulations to Scott Hamilton Kennedy and his team. While the scientific community has extolled its virtues, it is unclear how the film community will embrace Food Evolution. However, ultimately the filmmakers can revel in the satisfaction that they told the truth at a time when those that stand up are punished for telling the truth. It is a brave, first-class effort that will age impeccably well, and perhaps punctuate the transition to a gentler time where science and reason rule over misinformation and fear.

Food Evolution opens in New York and Los Angeles on June 23rd.

A version of this article appeared at Huffington Post as MOVIE REVIEW: Food Evolution and has been republished here with permission from the authors and the original publisher.

Kevin Folta is professor and chairman of the Horticultural Sciences Department at the University of Florida, Gainesville. Dr. Folta researches the functional genomics of small fruit crops, the plant transformation, the genetic basis of flavors, andstudies at photomorphogenesis and flowering. He has also written many publications and edited books, most recently the 2011 Genetics, Genomics, and Breeding of Berries. Follow him on Twitter@kevinfolta

More:
'Food Evolution' movie could mark turning point in public GMO discussion - Genetic Literacy Project

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on ‘Food Evolution’ movie could mark turning point in public GMO discussion – Genetic Literacy Project

Are You a Magnet for Mosquitoes? – Scientific American – Scientific American

Posted: at 3:50 am

When it comes to attraction, the allure can begin even before she sets eyes on you. There seems to be something about the way youher dinnersmells from afar that makes you a desired target. While you are chatting with friends or overseeing the barbecue, that mosquito will go on the hunt and make you her next blood meal. But what makes you so attractive to tiny ankle biters?

This month a group of British researchers is launching a new investigation into the role of human genetics in this process. They are planning to collect smelly socks from 200 sets of identical and nonidentical twins, place the footwear in a wind tunnel with the bugs and see what happens next. The owners of the socks, the scientists hope, may naturally produce attractive or repellant chemicals that could become the basis for future mosquito control efforts. The researchers expect that studying the popularity of the garments the skeeters hone in onand analyzing both the odor compounds in them and the genetics of their ownerscould help.The study, which will include 100 twins each from the U.K. and from the Gambia, will start recruiting volunteers in the coming weeks.

We know very little about the genetics of what makes us attractive to mosquitoes, says James Logan, a medical entomologist at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine who is leading the work. Earlier studies suggest visual, olfactory and thermal (body heat) cues all help drive mosquito attraction. We hope this study will give us more insights into the mechanisms that help change our body odors to make us more or less attractive to mosquitos, he says. If we can identify important genes, perhaps we could develop a pill or medication that would allow the body to produce natural repellents to keep mosquitoes away. The findings, he adds, could also help epidemiologists improve their models for how vulnerable certain populations may be to disease-carrying mosquitoes.

Already scientists know there are differences among us that contribute to why some of us get bitten more. Those of us who exhale more carbon dioxide seem to be a natural beacon for mosquitoes, in particular. Researchers have also found a correlation with body size, with taller or larger people tending to attract more bitesperhaps because of their carbon dioxide output or body surface area. There is also some evidence women who are pregnant or at certain phases of the menstrual cycle are more attractive to mosquitoes. Other work has found that people infected with malaria are more attractive to malaria-carrying mosquitoes during their transmissible stage of infection.

But what of our individual genetics? Two years ago Logans team published a small study looking at 18 sets of identical twins and 19 sets of nonidentical twins and their attractiveness to mosquitoes. They found that identical twins were more similar in their desirability to the blood-sucking insects than the nonidentical twins. Because earlier work had found that identical twins smell more alike than nonidentical twins, the British researchers surmised genes may play a role in this mosquito attractiveness.

This new study aims to nail down some more concrete conclusions with its larger sample size and add another population into the mix. (Most research in this area has focused on European Caucasians whereas this study will also include twins from the Gambia). There are other differences that set this apart from their earlier work, too: The 2015 study had tested attractiveness among Aedes mosquitoesthose that carry dengue and Zikawhereas this study will test attractiveness among Anopheles mosquitoes, a species that can transmit malaria. The team suspects the different species will be attracted to the same volatile compounds in human odor but wants to explore this further.

This is novel work and its a good step. It will tell us if there are genetic differences or not but it wont be a complete answer about mosquito attraction because other factors like diet, wind, time of day and mosquito species can all influence that, says Zainulabeuddin Syed, a professor of biological sciences at the University of Notre Dame who studies the smell-influenced behavior and movement of insects and is not involved in the Logan project. Syeds work has found that people of various ethnic groups all seem to produce four major volatile compounds (although at varying levels) and there are some early hints that one compound in particular, called nonanal, may be particularly attractive, at least among certain species of mosquitoes.

Exactly what genes contribute to producing compounds that could possibly interest mosquitoes remains a vast unknown. Scientists that study human odors and genetics have previously suggested scent cues associated with genetics are likely controlled via the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes. Those genes appear to play a role in odor production and also in mammals mating choicesbecause humans and mice alike appear to prefer mates that smell less similar to themselves, which scientists have theorized may be a natural control against inbreeding. As a result, Logans team may target those odor-linked genes, but he says they are looking at all the options. In the next couple of years, he says, they hope to have some early answers. For now, and likely for many years to come, we can only slather on some bug repellant and hope for the best.

Here is the original post:
Are You a Magnet for Mosquitoes? - Scientific American - Scientific American

Posted in Human Genetics | Comments Off on Are You a Magnet for Mosquitoes? – Scientific American – Scientific American

Research shows bone-building protein can be used in therapy – Baylor College of Medicine News (press release)

Posted: at 3:50 am

The WNT1 ligand has previously been identified in bone disease, but its role in bone homeostasis, its cellular source and targets in bone have only just recently been identified.The research, led by Dr. Brendan Lee at Baylor College of Medicine, appears in the Journal of Clinical Investigation.

To determine the bone-specific function of WNT1, the mutation that has been associated with recessive forms of Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) and other forms of early-onset osteoporosis, Lee, chair of the Department of Molecular and Human Genetics at Baylor, generated mouse models to study the consequences of both the loss and gain of WNT1 function in a specialized bone cell called the osteocyte.

This research builds on previous work that identified WNT1s role in coordination and its known effect on brain development. Now, we understand how this molecule works in bone, and this paper tells us that WNT1 is produced by osteocytes to control the activity of the bone-forming cell, the osteoblast, said Lee, also the Robert and Janice McNair Endowed Chair and professor of molecular and human genetics at Baylor.

The role of osteocytes, blasts and clasts

The over- or underexpression of WNT1 is controlled by osteocytes, or bone embedded cells. The osteocytes produce WNT1 to signal to bone-forming cells called osteoblasts that reside on the surface of bone via a biochemical pathway called mTORC1. When WNT1 is overexpressed by the osteocyte, bone formation is stimulated due to an increase in osteoblast numbers and collagen production following the activation of the mTORC1 pathway in these cells.

Osteocytes are embedded in the bone, with osteoblasts and osteoclasts sitting on the surface adding or removing bone, respectively, explained Lee. It turns out, osteocytes are actually the master controllers of this balance of bone formation and resorption in part by acting as either a receiver or sender of WNT signals.

We knew previously from others work that osteocytes could inhibit bone formation by producing the protein sclerostin, which represses osteoblast function. This research brings the cycle of information full circle by showing that while sclerostin turns the osteoblasts off, WNT1 from osteocytes turns them on, Lee said.

On the other hand, loss of WNT1 function resulted in low bone mass and spontaneous fracturing, similar to that seen in patients with OI. In this case, the osteocyte is not producing WNT1. However, osteocytes also can receive WNT signals themselves, leading them to control the activity of bone-removing cells, the osteoclasts.

Therapeutic impact

Primary therapies traditionally used to treat OI have shown limited efficacy in combating WNT1-related OI and osteoporosis. However, Lee and his research team identified anti-sclerostin antibody (Scl-Ab) treatment is effective in augmenting the action of other WNT ligands to improve bone mass and to significantly decrease the number of fractures in swaying mice, a model of WNT1 related OI and osteoporosis.

The results of this study, while conducted in mice, have important implications for the treatment of OI and osteoporosis in humans down the road, Lee said. By blocking sclerostin, the bone can be repaired effectively in diseases related to loss of WNT1 suggesting a personalized therapy. This is exciting especially as a promising anti-sclerostin drug is already in clinical development.

This work was supported by the Baylor College of Medicine Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the Baylor College of Medicine Advance Cores with funding from the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, the Rolanette and Berdon Lawrence Bone Disease of Texas and the Center for Skeletal Medicine and Biology at Baylor College of Medicine.

Other contributors to this work include Kyu Sang Jeong, Yi-Chien Lee, Yuqing Chen, Ming-Ming Jiang and Elda Munivez, all of whom are with Baylor, and Catherine Ambrose with the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.

Read the original here:
Research shows bone-building protein can be used in therapy - Baylor College of Medicine News (press release)

Posted in Human Genetics | Comments Off on Research shows bone-building protein can be used in therapy – Baylor College of Medicine News (press release)

David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA names winner of Switzer Prize for research excellence – UCLA Newsroom

Posted: at 3:50 am

Dr. Huda Zoghbi, a neurologist whose work has revealed the molecular basis of neurological disorders, is the recipient of the 2017 Switzer Prize awarded by the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA for excellence in biological and biomedical sciences research.

Zoghbis lab at the Baylor College of Medicine identified a gene mutation that causes Rett syndrome, a severe genetic disorder that mostly affects girls. After a short period of apparently normal development, the disorder causes them to lose language and motor skills, typically by 18 months of age. The discovery paved the way for a genetic test to diagnose the disorder. The same gene mutation can also cause autism, juvenile-onset schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric disorders.

Zoghbi also discovered the molecular mechanism of spinocerebellar ataxia 1, a neurodegenerative disorder in which peoples balance and coordination progressively worsens. Zoghbi and collaborator Harry Orr identified the gene mutation responsible for the disorder.

These and other discoveries by Zoghbi have opened up new areas of inquiry with the potential to advance diagnoses and treatments for Alzheimers disease, Parkinsons disease and other neurological diseases.

Dr. Zoghbis extraordinary work represents a powerful example of the direct impact that biological and biomedical research have on the lives of patients, said Dr. Kelsey Martin, dean of the Geffen School of Medicine.

Zoghbi is scheduled to deliver the Switzer Prize lecture at UCLA on Feb. 16, 2018. She will receive a $25,000 honorarium and a medallion.

Im honored to accept UCLAs Switzer Prize on behalf of the patients and the families to whom I am committed, and also on behalf of my many research collaborators and trainees, she said.

Zoghbi is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator, a professor at the Baylor College of Medicine and the founding director of the Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Childrens Hospital in Houston. She has faculty appointments in the departments of pediatrics, molecular and human genetics, neurology and neuroscience.

A native of Beirut, Lebanon, Zoghbi fled the civil war in her home country in the mid-1970s while a medical student at the American University of Beirut. She earned a medical degree at Meharry Medical College in Nashville and went on to become chief resident in pediatrics at Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Childrens.

After years of treating patients, Zoghbi became fascinated with the origins of disease and committed to a three-year fellowship in molecular genetics to acquire research training.

She is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Medicine and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Zoghbi is the recipient of a number of other prestigious awards, including the Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences, the Shaw Prize in Life Science and Medicine and the Canada Gairdner International Award.

See the article here:
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA names winner of Switzer Prize for research excellence - UCLA Newsroom

Posted in Human Genetics | Comments Off on David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA names winner of Switzer Prize for research excellence – UCLA Newsroom

FIRST LOOK: FootJoy DNA Helix golf shoes – Golf.com

Posted: at 3:49 am

The new FootJoy D.N.A. Helix golf shoe.

Courtesy of FootJoy

FootJoy, the dominant market leader in shoes, is cracking the code on stability. The latest version of its D.N.A (DryJoys Next Advancement) franchise, the D.N.A. Helix sports a wider TPU outsole, especially under the heel, to help you take your biggest cuts with confidence.

The company says the shoe is 38-percent more stable than the previous model. "I've worn every version and this is by far the best for me," says PGA Tour player Scott Stallings of the shoe in a release. "The additional support they built in, especially laterally as I move back and through the ball, is fantastic." The updated outsole is also a 23-percent lighter than before. Plus, a softer, more flexible foam insole and cushioned FTF ("fine-tuned foam") midsole enhance comfort while a stretchable tongue and padded collar ramp up the feel quotient. The D.N.A. Helix comes with choice of standard laces, or the Boa lacing system for an extra $30. In stores now; $210.

Follow this link:
FIRST LOOK: FootJoy DNA Helix golf shoes - Golf.com

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on FIRST LOOK: FootJoy DNA Helix golf shoes – Golf.com

First-of-Its-Kind DNA Video Raises Big Question About Molecule of Heredity – NBCNews.com

Posted: at 3:49 am

Jun.20.2017 / 5:04 PM ET

For the first time ever, scientists have captured a single DNA molecule replicating on video and its changing the way we think about the entire process. One of the most surprising findings is how much randomness characterizes the process.

Its a different way of thinking about replication that raises new questions, Stephen Kowalczykowski, molecular genetics professor at University of California, Davis, said in a press release. Its a real paradigm shift, and undermines a great deal of whats in the textbooks.

Related: Do We Really Share 99% of Our DNA With Chimps?

The researchers watched replicating DNA from E. coli bacteria. The first step in the process always sees the double helix unzipping into two strands a leading strand and a lagging strand. Each of these become a template for a new strand that is made to match it, leaving two complete DNA molecules when the process has reached the end. The researchers wanted to measure how fast the enzyme machinery moving along the different strands in opposite directions worked.

The polymerase on the leading strand can easily work at a continuous pace, but the polymerase on the lagging strand cannot. Until now, scientists believed that the polymerases on the two strands coordinated their movement somehow to ensure that one didnt get too far ahead of the other. However, this video shows that this isnt the case.

Related: CRISPR Gene Editing May Cause Hundreds of Unintended Mutations in DNA

Instead, the progress of the lagging strand polymerase looks a lot like stop and go traffic, stopping unpredictably and starting up again at random speeds that can vary tenfold. What seemed like coordination is really just the average outcome over time of this random process of variable speeds and starting and stopping.

Weve shown that there is no coordination between the strands. They are completely autonomous, Kowalczykowski said in the press release.

Related: Crispr-Cas9 The Future of Genetic Engineering

The researchers also discovered that the DNA molecule makes use of a kind of dead mans switch that it requires due to this lack of coordination. The switch kicks in to stop the spiral from unzipping too far and lets the polymerase catch up. This is important because it minimizes mutations, but it also prompts the question: how does the dead mans switch know to kick in if the two strands are working independently?

The research, published in "Cell," highlights how the human tendency to impose a vision of order on what is often more chaotic in reality can cause us to arrive at the wrong conclusions. The footage also provides some exciting new avenues for research. And while the blueprint to life on our planet might be less organized than we once thought, theres still enough mystery remaining in the DNA puzzle to make discovering new surprises an almost sure bet.

This article was originally published by Futurism. Read the original article.

FOLLOW NBC MACH ON TWITTER, FACEBOOK, AND INSTAGRAM.

Your Video Begins in: 00:00

Continued here:
First-of-Its-Kind DNA Video Raises Big Question About Molecule of Heredity - NBCNews.com

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on First-of-Its-Kind DNA Video Raises Big Question About Molecule of Heredity – NBCNews.com

Can Yoga Reprogram Your DNA? – Healthline

Posted: at 3:49 am

An examination of published studies shows yoga, meditation, tai chi, and other mind-body interventions offer therapeutic benefits down to a molecular level.

While many attest to the positive effects yoga and meditation have on their overall well-being, is there any hard science to back up these claims?

According to a new study published in Frontiers in Immunology, the answer could be Yes.

Researchers examined 18 studies published over the past 11 years. These studies included information on 800 people.

The researchers concluded that mind-body interventions (MBIs) activities such as yoga, meditation, and tai chi actually affect the bodies genes. The positive benefits of these activities included a reduction of stress and related symptoms at the molecular level.

These activities are leaving what we call a molecular signature in our cells, which reverses the effect that stress or anxiety would have on the body by changing how our genes are expressed, lead author Ivana Buric, a PhD student at Coventry University, said in a press release.

Put simply, MBIs cause the brain to steer our DNA processes along a path that improves our well-being.

Specifically, MBIs are able to influence gene activity related to inflammation.

During an interview with Healthline, Buric said, When we do yoga or meditation, we learn to perceive situations differently and consequently experience less stress, which then prevents the production of inflammatory proteins, he explained.

Rather than simply making one feel calm, or relaxed, there are real changes occurring within the brain and nervous system.

Broadly, when we experience something stressful in our lives, the sympathetic nervous system is engaged, increasing production of chemicals in the body that are commonly associated with feelings of fear, danger, or anxiety commonly called the fight-or-flight response.

Of those chemicals, a molecule called nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) is produced. It's responsible for causing genes to form proteins known as cytokines, which are responsible for cell inflammation.

In people who practice MBIs, the opposite seems to happen. A decrease in both NF-kB and cytokines leads to lower levels of inflammation in the body.

The genes that we inherited can change their activity ... We are now beginning to understand what aspects of our environment affect the activity of which genes, said Buric.

Read more: Living hard on the weekends can wreck your health

The impact of MBIs on inflammation has potentially far-reaching applications.

A range of psychological disorders, including PTSD, depression, and anxiety, as well as other medical conditions like asthma and arthritis, are all inflammation-related diseases.

However, Buric cautioned that there is no conclusive evidence that MBIs can treat these illnesses and that research is still lacking. More needs to be done to understand these effects in greater depth, for example, how they compare with other healthy interventions like exercise or nutrition.

While there has been a general sense of how MBIs affect human brains, this new study gives a deeper understanding of their impact on a molecular level. And highlighting a hard science approach might be more appealing to some skeptics.

MBIs occupy an increasingly important part of the health practices for people in the United States. A study in the journal Neurology in 2008 indicated that half of adults in the country use complementary and alternative medicine with mind-body therapy being the most commonly used form.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) also published its own survey of American usage of MBIs between 2002 and 2012, utilizing data from nearly 90,000 people. One of their key findings was yoga practice for individuals aged 18-44 nearly doubled, growing from approximately 5-10 percent.

At the same time, the American Psychological Association reported a continuing rise in stress level by generation with millennials and Gen Xers indicating significantly higher levels of stress than their parents.

What is clear from all this data is that, without proper treatment, stress levels particularly for younger and marginalized Americans will continue to rise, possibly leading to deteriorating health.

As these groups seek out new treatments, pressure will mount on the medical community to research the potential benefits of these nontraditional treatments, including MBIs.

This is an important foundation to build on to help future researchers explore the benefits of increasingly popular mind-body activities. said Buric.

Continue reading here:
Can Yoga Reprogram Your DNA? - Healthline

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Can Yoga Reprogram Your DNA? – Healthline

Page 1,720«..1020..1,7191,7201,7211,722..1,7301,740..»