The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Category Archives: Transhuman News
Early Version of Cancer Genome Reveals Vital Vulnerabilities – TrendinTech
Posted: August 13, 2017 at 1:46 am
In a collaborative effort across a number of institutions, including Harvard, the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and the Broad Institute of MIT, researchers have narrowed down 760 genes directly responsible for the survival of cancer cells.
Although most of the vulnerable genes vary from one cancer type to another, around 10 percent are consistent between types, making them possible targets for cancer-fighting therapies.
The study, published in the journal Cell, utilized small interfering RNA, or siRNA, to turn off single lines of DNA and see which cells were affected. Overall, 17,000 genes were tested in over 20 different kinds of cancer.
Even though so many genes were studied, 90 percent of the cancers tested only vitally relied on 76 sets of genes, indicating that many other cancers may also have a small core of key genes that can be exploited as treatment targets.
Additionally, a scientist used biomarkers to divide cells into groups that describe their role in biology with over 400 of the 769 mapped genes.The groups account for roles such as gene mutation, reduced or increased gene expression, and gene function.
Through the study, it was discovered that 20 percent of the vital genes were already targeted for existing drug therapies, providing more proof of their efficacy.
While the full cancer genome hasnt been identified for all types, the work is well under way, meaning doctors and scientists have more information with which to battle cancer and help patients with better treatments.
More News to Read
comments
Read this article:
Early Version of Cancer Genome Reveals Vital Vulnerabilities - TrendinTech
Posted in Genome
Comments Off on Early Version of Cancer Genome Reveals Vital Vulnerabilities – TrendinTech
Purcell: Is living to 125 too much of a good thing? | Columns | trib.com – Casper Star-Tribune Online
Posted: at 1:46 am
A 125-year life expectancy for human beings? I have zero desire to stick around that long.
Ah, yes, you speak of a debate among scientists over human longevity. I read about it at Business Insider. Some scientists argue that the maximum age humans may live is 115 years, whereas others argue that 125 years is possible.
A hundred and twenty-five years of watching Republicans and Democrats going at it? The heck with that.
Living is rife with challenges, to be sure. But living a long life has its upsides. Wouldnt you want to visit your parents and other family members for a lot more years than most of us are able? Wouldnt you like to see them all at a Sunday dinner several more times than most human beings are able?
Maybe with your family. My family has taken years off of my life!
I see, but wouldnt it be awesome if some of our finest human beings could stick around longer? Don Rickles, one of the greatest entertainers ever, died this year at 91. How great would it be to keep him around for two more decades?
True, but if Rickles were to stick around longer, that means annoying celebrities would stick around, too, and keep yapping at us every time a Republican becomes president.
There are other upsides to a longer life. What if we could keep our greatest minds around longer? Where would the world be if Einstein had another 25 years to unlock the mysteries of the universe?
But what if he figured out ways to extend human life even further, which would require me and the wife to have to keep coming up with new things to bicker about? Who has that kind of energy?
The downsides are a fair point. As people live longer, they could overburden government programs, such as Social Security. Where would we get all the money to support them?
How about we especially extend the lives of the rich so we can take them to the cleaners?
And living is expensive. If you live to 125, how will you pay for your housing and food and everyday expenses?
Thank goodness McDonalds is always hiring, but I for one have no desire to flip burgers at the age of 125.
The costs of medical care are too high for millions now. I imagine that at 125 years of age, ones medical bills would be difficult to manage.
Look, as a middle-aged guy who is already showing signs of fatigue, here is what I know about living. Life is largely made up of colds, bills, speeding tickets and people who let you down. These experiences are connected together by a series of mundane tasks.
Did anyone tell you how cheerful you can be? Go on.
Well, these drudgeries are occasionally interrupted by a wonderful meal, a really good laugh with friends or a romantic evening with a lovely woman. Then the mundane stuff starts all over again. Who wants 125 years of that?
A lot of people do. The human lifespan has improved significantly in the past few generations. Millions are living healthy lives beyond the age of 80 today, and, when they were younger, few of them expected to live that long. Why not live relatively good lives until 125?
Because then Id really worry about my slacker son.
Hes 35 years old and still living at home. If we drastically extend lifespans, my wife will have to tell him: Son, youre 100 years old! When are you going to move out of the basement and get a job?
Tom Purcell is a nationally syndicated Pittsburgh Tribune-Review humor columnist.
Excerpt from:
Purcell: Is living to 125 too much of a good thing? | Columns | trib.com - Casper Star-Tribune Online
Posted in Human Longevity
Comments Off on Purcell: Is living to 125 too much of a good thing? | Columns | trib.com – Casper Star-Tribune Online
Too much of a good thing? – Ledger Independent
Posted: at 1:46 am
"A 125-year life expectancy for human beings? I have zero desire to stick around that long."
"Ah, yes, you speak of a debate among scientists over human longevity. I read about it at Business Insider. Some scientists argue that the maximum age humans may live is 115 years, whereas others argue that 125 years is possible."
"A hundred and twenty-five years of watching Republicans and Democrats going at it? The heck with that."
"Living is rife with challenges, to be sure. But living a long life has its upsides. Wouldn't you want to visit your parents and other family members for a lot more years than most of us are able? Wouldn't you like to see them all at a Sunday dinner several more times than most human beings are able?"
"Maybe with your family. My family has taken years off of my life!"
"I see, but wouldn't it be awesome if some of our finest human beings could stick around longer? Don Rickles, one of the greatest entertainers ever, died this year at 91. How great would it be to keep him around for two more decades?"
"True, but if Rickles were to stick around longer, that means annoying celebrities would stick around, too, and keep yapping at us every time a Republican becomes president."
"There are other upsides to a longer life. What if we could keep our greatest minds around longer? Where would the world be if Einstein had another 25 years to unlock the mysteries of the universe?"
"But what if he figured out ways to extend human life even further, which would require me and the wife to have to keep coming up with new things to bicker about? Who has that kind of energy?"
"The downsides are a fair point. As people live longer, they could overburden government programs, such as Social Security. Where would we get all the money to support them?"
"How about we especially extend the lives of the rich so we can take them to the cleaners?"
"And living is expensive. If you live to 125, how will you pay for your housing and food and everyday expenses?"
"Thank goodness McDonald's is always hiring, but I for one have no desire to flip burgers at the age of 125."
"The costs of medical care are too high for millions now. I imagine that at 125 years of age, one's medical bills would be difficult to manage."
"Look, as a middle-aged guy, who is already showing signs of fatigue, here is what I know about living. Life is largely made up of colds, bills, speeding tickets and people who let you down. These experiences are connected together by a series of mundane tasks."
"Did anyone tell you how cheerful you can be? Go on."
"Well, these drudgeries are occasionally interrupted by a wonderful meal, a really good laugh with friends or a romantic evening with a lovely woman. Then the mundane stuff starts all over again. Who wants 125 years of that?"
"A lot of people do. The human lifespan has improved significantly in the past few generations. Millions are living healthy lives beyond the age of 80 today, and, when they were younger, few of them expected to live that long. Why not live relatively good lives until 125?"
"Because then I'd really worry about my slacker son."
"He's 35 years old and still living at home. If we drastically extend lifespans, my wife will have to tell him: 'Son, you're 100 years old! When are you going to move out of the basement and get a job?'"
Posted in Human Longevity
Comments Off on Too much of a good thing? – Ledger Independent
Ten Weird Ways Scientists Are Changing the World With Gene Editing – Newsweek
Posted: at 1:45 am
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing has captured the publics imagination. As this powerful technology becomes even more popular, it has also incited plenty of fears about what the future may bring. But a closer look at recent milestones and studies demonstrate the future of gene editing is already happening right now.
This experimental technique, known as CRISPR (pronounced crisper) for short,utilizes snippets of bacteria as a pair of molecular scissors. The technology allows scientists to selectively modify DNA segments, disable or alter genes or correct mutations in the genome of any living organism. In a controversial landmark study published earlier this month in Nature, scientists eliminated a genetic abnormality in a human embryo.
Gene editing is proving to be a nimble and versatile technology for redesigning the world. This area of research is certain to change nearly every field of biological sciencesincluding agriculture, medicine and zoologyand touch every aspect of our lives. Here are 10 ways scientists have already used CRISPR gene editing to do what once seemed impossible.
Tech & Science Emails and Alerts - Get the best of Newsweek Tech & Science delivered to your inbox
Here's how CRISPR-Cas9 works. REUTERS
A potential cure for diabetes. Scientists created genetically modified skin grafts to protect lab mice from diabetes. The experiment could help researchers identify a suitable substitute for insulin.
Eliminated disease from mosquitoes. In one experiment, researchers bred mosquitos that are resistant to the parasite that causes malaria.
Created a new type of seafood. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved a genetically modified salmon, known as AquaAdvantage salmon. Gene editing gave the fish the taste and texture of Chinook salmon and the efficient, rapid growth of ocean pout. Canadians are already eating them.
Super-strength animals. By deleting the relevant gene, scientists in China bred goats with more muscle (for meat) and hair (for wool).
Several changes to pigs. Scientists edited out all traces of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV), which brings us one step closer to creating a sustainable organ supply for transplant patients. Another new strain of pigs, known as Enviropigs produces manure that is low in phosphorus.Scientists can also now cut off the gene responsible for growth hormone in the animals, which could make micropigs the next pet.
Treated cancer. CRISPR has been used in a number pilot studies in China to treat aggressive cancers. In astudyof head and neck cancer, scientists tweaked genetic mutations in a patients blood, andthen injected the blood back into thepatient in order to suppress tumor growth.
Bolster the wine supply. At Rutgers University, researchers developed a way to cultivate grapes that can resist a type of mildew that can spoil the crop.
Make antisocial ants. Ants rely on their keen sense of smell to communicate. When scientists edited out the gene responsible for their sense of smell, the bugs behaviors changed. The researchers found their antennae and brain circuits didnt fully develop. Productivity in the colony, such as food foraging, also went down dramatically because the bugs were unable to work together effectively.
Eliminate cattle dehorning. The practice of removing the horns from cattle is especially painful to the animal. It'salso costly and time-consuming for farmers. Some scientists used CRISPR to breed cows that dont have horns.
Disable HIV. Though not yet studied in humans, scientists used gene editing to excise the HIV virus from the genomes of mice.
Go here to read the rest:
Ten Weird Ways Scientists Are Changing the World With Gene Editing - Newsweek
Posted in Gene Medicine
Comments Off on Ten Weird Ways Scientists Are Changing the World With Gene Editing – Newsweek
How Gene Editing And Pig Organs Can End The Human Transplant Shortage – Newsweek
Posted: at 1:44 am
Each year, some 30,000 patients undergo transplant surgery to receive an organ from a donor. Transplant medicine saves lives, but not enough people are willing to donate. Patients cant rely on the generosity of fellow humans to replace a heart, kidney or lungs. According to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), one patient is added to the U.S. transplant waiting list every 10 minutes, and 20 people on the national list die each day.
For decades, scientists have been hoping to address the organ shortage in more innovative ways, namely by tweaking the innards of other mammals to make them compatible with humans. Successfulanimal-to-human transplants (also known as xenotransplantation) would create a sustainable organ supply.
Pigs are the strongest contender for xenotransplantation because they have organs similar in size and physiological function to those found in humans. But pig organs on their own arent suitable for transplant. Human immune systems would most definitely reject pig organs. But an even greater challenge is the risk of animal viruses infectinghumans. Pigs carry active porcine endogenous retrovirus, and it remains unclear whether these viruses could becommunicable or fatal in humans. PERV infection would be dangerous becausetransplant recipients are routinely put on immunosuppressant drugs that make it difficult to fight off any bacteria or viruses.
Tech & Science Emails and Alerts - Get the best of Newsweek Tech & Science delivered to your inbox
If animal-to-human transplants can be achieved successfully, it would create a sustainable organ supply. Thanks to gene editing, this may be possible in the future. REUTERS
Nowa team of researchers affiliated with Harvard Medical School appear to have solved one of these problems. Not only have these scientistsmade a controversial possibilityanimal organs in humansmore likely, but theyve done so using a controversial technology: CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing.
Through gene editing, the team eliminated all traces of the PERV virus from the cell line and conducted in vitro fertilization. There are 25 strains of PERV, which is the only known active retrovirus found in pigs. In the study, published Thursday in the journal Science, biologist Luhan Yang and her team implanted the PERV-free embryos into surrogates. The fetuses did not become reinfected with the virus, and the newbornpiglets are the first animals born without PERV. Yangwho founded eGenesis a few years ago to harness advances in CRISPR-Cas9 for the worldwide organ shortagewill now monitor the animals for any long-term effects.
Im a strong believer that science can help us improve health care if we look holistically for a solution, says Yang, lead author on the paper and chief science officer of eGenesis, the biotechnology company funding advancements in the research. Because there are millions of patients who suffer from end-stage organ failure, their life could potentially be saved, or largely improved, by this potential organ resource.
CRISPR-Cas9, or CRISPR (pronounced crisper) for short, is an experimental biomedical technique. The technology utilizes snippets of certain bacteria that allow for selective modifications of DNA segments, such as changingthe misspellings of a gene that contributeto mutations. Since CRISPR was identified several years ago, scientists have been using it in the laboratory to alter the genetic codes of living organisms. The new technologyis already leading advances once considered the stuff of science fiction. In astudy published last week in Nature,scientistseliminated a genetic abnormality in a human embryo.
Yang has been determined tousegene editing to solve the organ shortage problemfor several years. In 2013, sheand her team published the first paper showing CRISPR could be used to accurately and effectively alter the immune system. In 2015, she eradicated 62 copies of the PERV virus from a pig cancer cell line, which she says is a world record for researchers using CRISPR. The next step, she says, is to tweak the porcine genome further to prove the organs can be compatible with the human immune system.
Resurrecting aScientific Vision
For decades, xenotransplantation research seemed impossibly dangerous and financially risky both for small biomedical companies and large pharmaceutical companies. In the early 2000s, Novartis stopped funding xenotransplantation research. The U.S. Food Administration, fearing a public health disaster, began placing regulations on research facilities, whichmade studies even more challenging. The projects were costly andtoo complicated, and animal rights activists frequentlytargeted the scientists. But CRISPR is reviving the area of research once again, says Yang.
Transgenic PERV-free pigs could provide a source for solid organs as well as islet cells, which are tiny cells scattered throughout the pancreas that secrete insulin. Some successful pilot studies looked at porcine islet cell transfusions as a potential treatment for diabetes.
Dixon Kaufman, president-elect of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons and a transplant surgeon at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, says its only a matter of timeprobably a few yearsbefore xenotransplant studies are open to patients. I think it is a realistic, almost palpable opportunity, he says. Anything that will improve safety, such as deleting this risk of the PERV infection, makes this more viable.
Kaufman thinks kidneys and pancreases will be the first solid animal organs transplanted into humans. Because these are non-vital organs, failure wouldnt necessarily lead to death. Patients who need a kidney could still receive dialysis, and those who need a pancreas could still access insulin.
These advances are a boon for transplant surgeons like Kaufman, who regularly have to tell patientsthey will probably die before a donated organ becomes available. He doesnt think a pig organ would be a hard sell to most of these patients, who are otherwise facing certain death.
The field is inherently sort of risky to begin with, and I think a lot of patients have already processed that, he says. I tell patientsin the grand designwe were not meant to swap body parts between ourselves.
View post:
How Gene Editing And Pig Organs Can End The Human Transplant Shortage - Newsweek
Posted in Gene Medicine
Comments Off on How Gene Editing And Pig Organs Can End The Human Transplant Shortage – Newsweek
The Vent for Aug. 13 – Bucks County Courier Times
Posted: at 1:44 am
The dialogue between Trump and Kim Jong-un has regressed to "my father can beat up your father."
Alison Kelley, Newtown
Trump declined to declare an opioid emergency. Where is Rep. Fitzpatrick's response to this setback for his primary legislative advocacy objective? Fitzpatrick's silence speaks volumes.
Kierstyn Zolfo, Newtown
Recently Google fired James Damore for publishing his personal anti diversity views. Damores transgression was perpetrating gender stereotypes. Its amazing but not surprising how the left punishes speech it finds offensive or politically incorrect.
Rick Staedtler, Holland
After North Korea immediately crossed Trumps Fire and Fury red line, the administration immediately backed down from it. That shows them and the world Trump's weak leadership.
Ron Aible, Trevose
Our golfer-in-chief is doing what he does best, vacationing at one of his resorts while disrupting the local communities and businesses around them, costing millions.
Dave Mulhaney, Bristol
Given that nukes are nuts, steps should be undertaken urgently to assure that nuclear weapons are never used again -- by accident, miscalculation or design. Kim Jong-un and Trump are both playing with disaster and millions of lives .
Barry Lynn, Newtown
Senator McConnell suggests that Trump is not experienced in the ways of Washington and expects faster progress. Maybe walking through the swamp slows Congress down.
Chuck Ellis, Lower Makefield
Clinton and Obama and their administrations allowed North Korea and Iran to develop nukes. Why are Democrats so surprised and concerned that Trump may have to respond? Hypocrites!
Gary Clark, Washington Crossing
Follow this link:
The Vent for Aug. 13 - Bucks County Courier Times
Posted in Politically Incorrect
Comments Off on The Vent for Aug. 13 – Bucks County Courier Times
China’s newest ‘decacorn’ doesn’t fear Facebook’s trial balloons – Fortune
Posted: at 1:44 am
Founder and CEO of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg giving a speech.David Ramos Getty Images
Two fascinatingand inter-relatedChina tech stories surfaced Friday. The first involved Facebook which, according to a report by The New York Times , has tip-toed back into the China market using a photo-sharing app called "Colorful Balloons". The second involves a news aggregation site, Jinri Toutiao , who's name literally means "today's headline."
The Times reports that Facebook authorized the release of Colorful Balloons caise qiqiu () in Mandarinon the Chinese version of the iOS App Store in May. The app looks and functions like Facebook Moments , (hence the balloons) but carries no overt Facebook branding. The app was released through a local company named Youge Internet Technology, which has no apparent connection to Facebook.
Facebook seemed to obliquely acknowledge that it had authorized the app. We have long said that we are interested in China, and are spending time understanding and learning more about the country in different ways, the company said in a statement.
Trying to learn about China without Beijing's blessing would be a bold move for Facebook, which was banned in China in July 2009 after the network was used to spread news of riots between ethnic Uighurs and Han Chinese in the western Chinese city of Urumqi. Since then, CEO Mark Zuckerberg has tried just about everything he could think of to curry favor with China's communist rulers. He learned to speak Mandarin , invited China's Internet czar to tour Facebook headquarters in Menlo Park, California, and made multiple forays to China himself. Facebook even went as far as designing a new censorship tool that would enable a third party to prevent Facebook users in China from posting and sharing content Beijing deemed politically incorrect.
It has all been to no avail. China shut down Instagram , which Facebook owns, in 2014, and last month put the squeeze on WhatsApp , Facebook's popular messaging app.
The Times declared the release of Colorful Balloons "stealthy and anonymous," "unprecedented," and a mark of the "desperationand frustrationof global tech companies as they try to break into the world's largest online market." Hard to disagree with that.
Which brings us to Toutiao. The service was launched in 2012 by 34-year old former Microsoft employee Zhang Yiming and is operated by Zhang's company, the delightfully named Beijing ByteDance Technology.
ByteDance may be China's hottest startup. The venture has already raised more than $1 billion from Sequoia Capital and CCB International, the overseas investment arm of China Construction Bank. On Friday, Reuters, citing "people familiar with the matter," reported that ByteDance is seeking an additional $2 billion in funding at the jaw-dropping valuation of over $20 billion. That would make ByteDance a " decacorn " and then someequal in valuation to Peter Theil's Palantir. Reuters says U.S.-based private equity firm General Atlantic is among potential new investors.
This essay was originally published in our CEO Daily Newsletter. Subscribe .
Why would savvy investors like Sequoia and General Atlantic be so keen to throw money at a news aggregator in country where news is so heavily censored by government? Well, one reason is that the country in question is China, which has 700 million Internet users and is still growing like mad. But there's another that's probably more important: China's Draconian censorship policy makes it one of the only major markets in the world where startup news aggregators don't have to worry about getting steamrolled by Facebook, which has become a primary news source for users in less restricted markets. In China, Toutiao has no natural predators.
There are no staff writers or editors at Toutiao. The service generates no content of its own. Instead, it uses artificial intelligence to create personalized news feeds of short articles and videos from content generated by its network of 4,000 outside media companies including state-owned entities like Xinhua and private outlets like Caixin . The app analyzes what media its users consume and tracks their interactions on social media.
Analysts say Toutiao's content recommendation technology is scary goodpossibly the most sophisticated in the worldand has many potential applications in markets beyond China. In February, ByteDance bought Flipagram, a Los Angeles-based video startup. The company also owns TopBuzz, and English-language news app TopBuzz, has a stake in an Indian news aggregator and is reported to be considering expanding into Brazil and Japan.
In its home market, Toutiao has become the most popular news offering on China's App Store and claims more than 80 million daily active users who spend an average of 76 minutes reading news and watching videos through the app. Revenue comes mostly from online advertising, and totaled nearly $870 million last year, a fivefold increase over the previous year.
As Reuters notes, Toutiao, along with online services firm Meituan-Dianping and ride-hailing company Didi Chuxing, are collectively known as "TMD." The three ventures are generally held to be the next wave of Chinese Internet wonders following the "BAT," the country's three tech giants, Baidu, Alibaba and Tencent.
Tencent and Baidu operate Toutiao's two biggest competitors. If China's homegrown tech giants try to muscle in, they would pose formidable rivals. For now, though, Toutiao has little to fear from Facebook and its colorful trial balloons.
Read more from the original source:
China's newest 'decacorn' doesn't fear Facebook's trial balloons - Fortune
Posted in Politically Incorrect
Comments Off on China’s newest ‘decacorn’ doesn’t fear Facebook’s trial balloons – Fortune
The alt-right supporters of James Damore, the fired Google engineer who authored the so-called anti-diversity memo … – Quartz
Posted: at 1:44 am
The alt-right supporters of James Damore, the fired Google engineer who authored the so-called anti-diversity memo, are planning nationwide protests on Googles US campuses.
The first demonstrations are slated to happen on Aug. 19 at five locations: Mountain View, California, where Google is headquartered; New York City; Washington, DC; Austin, Texas; and Boston, Massachusetts. A website for organizing the details for #MarchOnGoogle says it plans to hold protests at every Google office. The website says demonstrators might exercise their right to free speech by protesting in front of the homes of Googles executive team.
A company representative tells Quartz that it is aware of the upcoming protests, but has declined to comment or say if it would try to stop them.
The protests are meant to raise awareness on how Google does not respect freedom of speech and censors dissenting voices on its video-sharing site YouTube, according to the organizer, Jack Posobiec. (To the ire of far-right radicals, YouTube does police hate speech.) Google canceled a town-hall meeting for its 60,000 employees at the last minute on Aug. 10, citing concerns for their safety, after the names of some staff were leaked to right-wing sites.
Posobiec has also invited Damore, who was fired on Aug. 7, to speak. At the heart of the brouhaha is an internal email he wrote that went viral when it leaked to the media. In it he questioned Silicon Valleys efforts to boost diversity, calling them a form a discrimination, and argued that techs gender gap was partly due to biological differences between men and women.
Damore, who has said he is considering his legal options, has not publicly commented on whether he will attend or speak at any of the rallies. A Twitter account that appeared to belong to him recently posted photos of a man wearing a shirt emblazoned with Goolag and holding a sign that reads Fired for truth on Googles Mountain View campus.
Read the rest here:
The alt-right supporters of James Damore, the fired Google engineer who authored the so-called anti-diversity memo ... - Quartz
Posted in Censorship
Comments Off on The alt-right supporters of James Damore, the fired Google engineer who authored the so-called anti-diversity memo … – Quartz
Artwork Mocking Google’s Censorship Just Started Popping Up In California – The Federalist
Posted: at 1:44 am
New street art mocks Google's decision to reject those who "Think Different".
Artwork mocking Google for its oppressive censorship is popping up all over the Los Angeles area, near Googles office in Venice, California.
Earlier this week, Google fired one of its engineers, James Damore, after he wrote a 10-page memo criticizing the way the tech giant treated female employees as well as the companys crippling level of liberal bias. In the memo, Damore pointed out the fact that men and women are different, and argued Googles refusal to recognize these differences and embrace them was hurting the company. The memo was distorted by members of the media as an anti-diversity tirade, when in reality, as many social scientists pointed out,science backs up Damores statements.
Portions of the memo violate our Code of Conduct and cross the line by advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace, Google CEO Sundar Pichai wrote in a memo earlier this week.
Right-wing street artist Sabo took credit for the work in a series of tweets blasting the tech company.
Last night, news broke that Google cancelled an all hands on deck meeting about Damores firing out of fear that it would leak to the media. New York Times columnist David Brooks called for Pichai to resign. And Damore has taken to the pages of the Wall Street Journal to explain why he was fired.
More here:
Artwork Mocking Google's Censorship Just Started Popping Up In California - The Federalist
Posted in Censorship
Comments Off on Artwork Mocking Google’s Censorship Just Started Popping Up In California – The Federalist
OPINION | Trump’s climate change censorship puts us all at risk – The Hill (blog)
Posted: at 1:44 am
Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpColbert questions Trump: What's tougher than 'fire and fury'? Trump's DC hotel exceeds expectations making M so far in 2017 Graham on North Korea: 'If we have to, we'll go to war' MOREs attempts to undermine the First Amendment are undoubtedly troubling. But his attacks on the First Amendment are only part of the story. Trump is also stifling unbiased data and research that is coming from his own administration, and that is even more worrisome than his ongoing fake news crusade.
Silencing dissent and basic scientific data and research, all in the name politics, is behavior fit for a dictatorship, not a democracy, and Congress should act immediately to protect research and data, as well as whistle-blowers who are sounding the alarm on Trumps censorship, before its too late.
This week it was reported that the Department of Agriculture stopped using the term climate change and has been instructed to use the term weather extremes instead. Further, the USDA had to replace the phrase reduce greenhouse gases with the completely ambiguous build soil organic matter, increase nutrient use efficiency. Were in the middle of the second hottest year on record and the president wont let the federal government talk about it in words that actual humans can understand.
Government scientists fear Trump will suppress climate change study: report https://t.co/U3RR9Edsqm pic.twitter.com/bieBBNbpgl
In fact, one of Trumps first actions as president was to gag employees at the Environmental Protection Agency, Interior Department, Department of Agriculture, and Department of Health and Human Services agencies that are responsible for informing the public about climate change from publishing press releases, blog posts, or otherwise publicizing upcoming public events. The employees at these agencies were informed that they could not even send correspondence to other public officials and instead would have to go through senior officials who were reportedly instructed to wait until they received instructions from the White House.
President Trumps climate censorship extends to the Department of Energy and the State Department, too. In March it was reported that a supervisor at the DOEs Office of International Climate and Clean Energy instructed staff not to use the phrases climate change, emissions reduction, or Paris Agreement," while just this week it was reported Secretary of State, and former ExxonMobil CEO, Rex TillersonRex Wayne TillersonChuck Todd: Gorka a menace to other staff White House aide insists he was criticizing 'fake news' journalists, not Tillerson State responds to Gorka, says Tillerson carries a 'big stick' MORE, told U.S. diplomats to give vague answers about re-entering the Paris Agreement. How can we join with our allies around the world to address one of the biggest global threats we face if we cant even discuss it?
Trump's Agriculture Department telling staffers to stop using the term "climate change" https://t.co/6cUFX2Cg39 pic.twitter.com/OY4sUrrl5W
Clearly, scientists share this fear because a draft of a comprehensive climate change report written by scientists from 13 federal agencies was leaked out of fear that Trump would try to suppress the findings. The report provides some of the strongest evidence to date that humans are primarily responsible for rising global temperatures since 1951 and therefore must immediately take large-scale corrective action. This finding stands in stark contrast to President Trump and the climate-change skeptics Scott Pruitt and Rick PerryJames (Rick) Richard PerryOPINION | Trumps climate change censorship puts us all at risk Five takeaways from the federal climate report Dems face fundamental problem in Texas: Getting people to vote MORE he has put in charge of the EPA and Department of Energy, respectively, who argue human impact is minimal-to-non-existent.
The Trump administration's concerted climate censorship attack is a threat to our standing in the world, our preparedness to deal with a global crisis, and to our economy. A study by a team of scientists and economists published in the June 30th edition of "Science," the journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, found, essentially, "the warmer it gets, the bigger the hit to the economy" and if global warming continues unchecked it could result in up to six points off of the United States' gross domestic product by the end of the century.
Trump's EPA head casts doubt on "supposed threat" of climate change https://t.co/1NAZQpbSM5 pic.twitter.com/Qk8v1PZo7Z
The study predicts that the hardest hit regions in the United States will be the South and the Midwest, which could reportedly face "huge damage to their local economies, due to enormous electric bills, dying crops, or mass migration away from the area, a warning that we cannot in good conscience ignore.
If left unchecked, Trump will continue to use censorship to remake the federal government in his own distorted image. We cannot let that happen, and every American has a responsibility to speak out against these reckless attacks on science, research, and transparency.
That starts with Congress, who has a constitutional responsibility to serve as a check on the Executive Branch, particularly when it comes to partisan overreach. They should act to protect researchers and scientists who should be able to work independently of political interference. Research shouldnt be politicized and scientific findings shouldnt be silenced to serve a presidents partisan agenda.
Emily Aden is the rapid response director of American Bridge, a progressive research and communications organization. Follow her on Twitter @emad16.
The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the views of The Hill.
More:
OPINION | Trump's climate change censorship puts us all at risk - The Hill (blog)
Posted in Censorship
Comments Off on OPINION | Trump’s climate change censorship puts us all at risk – The Hill (blog)