Page 1,407«..1020..1,4061,4071,4081,409..1,4201,430..»

Category Archives: Transhuman News

Facts and Facebook: It shouldn’t censor political ads – The Union Leader

Posted: January 18, 2020 at 9:47 am

Facebook is in the doghouse with certain liberal constituencies because it declines to edit or censor political advertisements that may contain false statements or misleading claims. We side with Facebook on this one.

Among other things, attempting to tease truth from political claims is often as challenging today as it was when Hamilton and Burr went at it a few years ago. We arent suggesting that todays politicians settle their disputes in similar fashion, in a field with pistols. But ... never mind.

While some political assertions are demonstrably false, others are not; and some fact-checking outfits allow their own political biases to affect their true or false verdicts.

Facebook says it is adding features that will allow its users some measure of control over the number of political and social issue ads they want to see. But it says it operates from the principle that people should be able to hear from those who wish to lead them, warts and all.

It is up to the people to decide whether they buy what some politician or group is selling. Facebook is one platform and while it is huge, we dont think imposing some government censorship on it is a good thing.

Part of the trouble here is that some anti-Trumpers still refuse to believe that rational people voted for this guy of their own free will. They must have been duped, the theory goes, by Facebook and other means.

Continuing to believe that is not going to win elections. Stating facts and offering sensible solutions to the nations problems may do so.

See the original post:
Facts and Facebook: It shouldn't censor political ads - The Union Leader

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Facts and Facebook: It shouldn’t censor political ads – The Union Leader

‘Push back against those who abuse the law to silence the media’ Index on Censorship – The Shift News

Posted: at 9:47 am

In March last year, hundreds of journalists took the streets in Croatia. But they werent covering a news story, they were creating one: staging a rally to protest against the more than 1,000 lawsuits that have been brought against journalists in the country.

The Croatian Journalists Association, which organised the march, identified an astonishing 1,100 cases against news outlets and reporters filed by politicians and other public figures. But Croatia is far from being alone. Across the European Union, powerful and wealthy individuals and big business are tangling journalists up in legal knots to stifle public interest reporting.

Often starting with a letter from a law firm that forbids the journalist or media organisation in question from even disclosing the receipt of the letter, news organisations are told to halt publication, correct or withdraw stories or face the possibility of a long, drawn-out legal battle, as experienced by The Shift.

Index on Censorship itself, which publishes a quarterlymagazineon censorship, has been in receipt of such letters. They are written in terse, formal language that can make even the hardiest of reporters doubt themselves even when they know with absolute certainty their story is true. We have heard from other news outlets that some letters request news outlets not just to delete or correct a story or face legal action but tell a reporter they can never report on a particular individual again.

The Shift knows the format well, having been on the receiving end of countless such letters. ThoughThe Shift reports such threats, others do not or cannot.

Robert Mihaljevic, editor in chief of Croatian regional newspaper Podravski, told news outlet DW last year that political strongmen were trying to silence every critical voice using the threat of legal action as their weapon of choice.

Thats why you can feel the need to self-censor in our newsroom, he said. I dont even write my column anymore, because if I write it the way I want, lawsuits and compensation claims would endanger our jobs.

This is the dark heart of the problem of such legal threats. Faced with the choice of dropping an important public interest story or heading into a legal battle that could bankrupt the organisation or the individual, and would suck up huge amounts of time (one Italian editor has estimated he spends three months out of every 12 fighting libel actions), news outlets often make the difficult decision to quietly pull a story or investigation.

A number of Maltese media organisations, for example, who were in receipt of the same threat of legal action as those received by murdered journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia, admitted they had pulled stories. And this is repeated across the region. One editor at a senior European newspaper an organisation that has the good fortune to have its own legal counsel and funds for expensive court cases told Index on Censorship that even their newspaper needs to pick its battles.

Fighting such threats can be exhausting, and isolating. Caruana Galizia was facing more than 40 suits at the time of her death, a pattern repeated in other countries where individual journalists might be fending off several law suits at a time. Thats a tough burden for a well-resourced news outlet, it is an impossible burden one for a freelance reporter.

Index on Censorship has heard anecdotally that insurance companies in some countries are now refusing to insure media organisations because of the rising number of so-called SLAPP law suits those deliberately intended to frustrate public interest reporting through vexatious legal claims.

This has to stop. A free and independent media is the lifeblood of democracy. We need reporters to have the time and resources to investigate corruption and abuse of power in our societies. If they are tied up in lengthy, expensive legal cases brought by the powerful they cannot perform this crucial function.

That is why Index on Censorship has launched anew research projectthat aims to understand the extent of the problem. We know that one of the major problems is that journalists and media houses often feel unable to talk about these threats. Cases are settled and stories quietly dropped so that the media house can go on reporting.

We want to end that culture of silence. Our project will seek to gain as much information as possible about the law firms issuing legal threats, the laws being used to justify such actions increasingly this involves the use of data protection and privacy laws rather than the traditional claim of defamation and the actions taken by journalists and journalism organisations as a result.

Over the next few months we will be interviewing as many people as possible to get to the bottom of this problem and propose solutions, working with all those already doing fantastic work to combat such threats including the likes of Greenpeace, Committee to Protect Journalists, European Centre for Press and Media Freedom, Reporters Without Borders and Scottish PEN.

Anyone who has ever received a letter from a lawyer over a story they know to have been accurate should get in touch and together we can push back against those who abuse the law to silence the media.

Read the rest here:
'Push back against those who abuse the law to silence the media' Index on Censorship - The Shift News

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on ‘Push back against those who abuse the law to silence the media’ Index on Censorship – The Shift News

SPLC Pushes Big Tech Censorship in the Name of Fighting White Supremacy – PJ Media

Posted: at 9:47 am

In congressional testimony on Wednesday, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) demanded that big tech, donor-advised funds, and government take action against mainstream conservative and Christian organizations in the name of fighting against white supremacy and the "global terrorist threat" of white nationalism. This testimony may bolster legal claims that the SPLC engages in routine defamation by accusing its ideological opponents of being "hate groups" on par with the Ku Klux Klan.

In the testimony, Lecia Brooks, the SPLC's chief workplace transformation officer, made three points: she warned about a "surging white nationalist movement in the United States" linked to a "global terrorist threat"; she rooted that movement in "toxic, anti-democratic white supremacist ideology that is metastasizing on social media networks and other websites that traffic in hate"; and she recommended that tech companies"disrupt the funding, organizing and recruiting efforts of hate groups and bad actors who seek to normalize racism, antisemitism, and anti-immigrant ideologies as well as sexism and anti-LGBTQ animus."

While Brooks blamed President Donald Trump for having "undoubtedly energized the white nationalist movement," she attributed the rise in "far-right radicalization" to the internet. "Long before Donald Trump entered office, white supremacists around the world began constructing a robust, online ecosystem that indoctrinates people especially young white men into the world of hate." Brooks went on to note thatterrorist shooters inspired by white nationalism did find inspiration on the internet.

Yet the SPLC staffer did not limit her warnings to white nationalism or the terrorism it has inspired. She also warned about other kinds of "hate groups," including a broad swath of conservative and Christian organizations. The SPLC has falsely accused organizations like Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), the Family Research Council (FRC), ACT for America, the Center for Security Policy (CSP), the Ruth Institute, D. James Kennedy Ministries (DJKM), and more of being "hate groups" comparable to the KKK by placing them on the same list.

Throughout the testimony, Brooks used the term "hate group" interchangeably with "white supremacy" and the white nationalist terror movement. Worse, she rightly condemned white nationalist terrorists in vivid detail, but then urged action against vague "hate groups," suggesting that such action would counter the spread of white supremacist terrorism.

"For decades, the SPLC has been fighting hate and exposing how hate groups use the internet. We have lobbied internet companies, one by one, to comply with their own rules to prohibit their services from being used to foster hate or discrimination. A key part of this strategy has been to target these organizations funding," Brooks testified.

"The first targets of our attack against hate group funding online were PayPal, Apples iTunes and Amazon. The SPLC found that at least 69 hate groups were using PayPal, the worlds largest online payment processor, to collect money from merchandise sales and donations. PayPal was earning a fee from each transaction, and essentially served as the banking system for white nationalism," she added.

That list of 69 "hate groups" included JihadWatch and ACT for America, and likely included other organizations that have absolutely nothing to do with white nationalism. Yet Brooks insisted that by allowing "hate groups" to participate, PayPal "served as the banking system for white nationalism."

Big Tech has moved against virulent white nationalists, and many Americans likely welcome these moves. Facebook banned open white supremacy, for example. Yet the SPLC seeks to shut down conservative and Christian groups by equating them with this kind of evil rhetoric. In her testimony, Brooks boasted about the SPLC's Orwellian "Change the Terms" coalition, which uses the threat of white supremacy to push Big Tech companies to silence "hate" on their platforms.

Yet Brooks was not content with Big Tech censorship. "Charities also have a role to play in fighting hate online by blocking donations to hate groups. Charitable gift funds including the largest charity in the United States are helping dozens of hate groups raise millions of dollars by allowing their donors not to reveal their identities," she warned.

The SPLC staffer pointed at Fidelity Charitable Gift Fund, Schwab Charitable Fund, and others for allowing individual donors to "funnel nearly $11 million to 34 organizations that we have identified as hate groups." Ironically, only one of the identified "hate groups" was white nationalist, while the other 33 were "anti-LGBT," "anti-Muslim," "anti-immigrant," and "radical traditionalist Catholic." The union-backed Amalgamated Bank led a campaign to pressure charitable funds to cut off "hate groups" last March.

Brooks ended her remarks with suggestions for government. she chided the FBI's Domestic Terrorism Analysis Unit for its investigation into a "black identity movement" involving terrorism inspired by the Black Lives Matter movement. Brooks claimed that "no such movement exists." She also faulted federal law enforcement for "viewing anti-fascist protesters as just as problematic as the deadly white supremacist movement."

Summing up, the SPLC staffer warned that "internet companies must do far more to combat extremism and hate. To stem the rise of hate and domestic terrorism, we are encouraging tech companies to respect people over profits."

This testimony reveals the SPLC's demonization strategy and should bolster the many defamation lawsuits that have been filed against the far-left smear group. In 2018, the SPLC paid $3.375 million to settle a defamation lawsuit from Maajid Nawaz, a Muslim anti-terror reformer whom it had branded an "anti-Muslim extremist." Liberty Counsel, D. James Kennedy Ministries, the Center for Immigration Studies, Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes, and the American Freedom Law Center have sued over the "hate group" accusation.

According to Megan L. Meier, a partner at Clare Locke, the law firm that represented Nawaz in his lawsuit, The SPLCs hate group accusation is a financial and reputational death sentence, effectively equating organizations to the KKK. No right-thinking person wants to be associated with the KKK, so the SPLCs hate group accusation is incredibly effective at shaming organizations and causing them to be shunned by donors, fundraising platforms, service providers, the media and others."

Last March, the SPLC fired its co-founder amid a racism and sexism scandal that also involved former employees coming forward admitting they were "part of the con" exaggerating hate in order to raise money.

While the SPLC presents its "hate group" accusations as unvarnished fact in media interviews and congressional testimony, it argues in court that the "hate group" accusation is a mere matter of opinion, protected under the First Amendment. Yet congressional testimony like this gives the lie to that idea.

"This is more of the same scam the SPLC has been running for years now," John Rabe, director of creative production DJKM, told PJ Media on Thursday, referring to Brooks' testimony. "While arguing before Congress that Bible-believing groups who oppose same-sex marriage and the transgender agenda ought to be lumped together with white nationalist terrorist groups, they argue behind the scenes in federal court that their 'hate' designations are actually meaninglessa mere matter of personal opinion."

"The disingenuousness of this is staggering," Rabe explained. "They want groups to be censored and banned in social media based on their designations while insisting to the courts that the designations are 'not provable as false.'"

He summarized the SPLC's strategy as "marginalizing and silencing conservative Christians by lumping them together with genuine terror groups. They specialize in guilt-by-association, and a gullible media--as well as all too many government agenciesunquestioningly accept their tendentious conclusions."

"The terrible irony, of course, is that the SPLCs defamatory 'hate map' actually inspired in a terror attack at the Family Research Council in Washington, D.C., making the SPLC more demonstrably dangerous than many of the groups they purport to expose," Rabe argued, referring to a shooter who told the FBI that he targeted FRC because of the SPLC's "hate group" accusation.

"They darkly warn that the rhetoric used by the groups they target could lead to violencewhile employing rhetoric that literally inspired a terror attack. If the SPLC were truly concerned about rhetoric resulting in violence, theyd shut down their own 'hate map' and stop their campaign against Bible-believing Christians," he concluded.

ACT for America Communications Director R.C. Maxwell slammed Brooks as an "aristocrat," a reference to the SPLC's wealth millions of it held in offshore accounts.

"An aristocrat lobbying for Congress to pressure tech companies to remove the voice of Brigitte Gabriel, a Lebanese woman who migrated to this country, is merely further proof that the SPLC will never return to being a civil rights stalwart. Shame on Congress for pretending the SPLC has credibility," Maxwell said.

Craig Parshall, founding director at the John Milton Project for Digital Free Speech at National Religious Broadcasters, told PJ Media, "The SPLC has a track record of irresponsibly labeling legitimate conservative advocacy groups and Christian ministries as 'hate groups' because their values are deemed to be politically incorrect. Its recent testimony in Congress shows that the SPLC is not only unapologetic for this trend, even worse, it wants to spread its ideological slander to Silicon Valley."

"Big Tech does not need any more incentive to suppress conservative and Christian viewpoints. As our work through the John Milton Project for Digital Free Speech has proven, platforms like Facebook, Twitter and Google already have an unhealthy appetite for suppressing opinions they dont like," Parshall concluded.

Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, who has told PJ Media that more than 60 organizations are considering separate defamation lawsuits against the SPLC, said the recent testimony is one more piece of evidence that "the SPLC has no credibility."

"The mission of the SPLC is to destroy those with whom they disagree by falsely lumping them in with violent groups," he added.

While Lecia Brooks likely intended her testimony to support the SPLC's efforts to silence "hate groups," the testimony may provide crucial evidence in efforts to hold the far-left group accountable for its malicious smears.

Tyler O'Neil is the author ofMaking Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Follow him on Twitter at@Tyler2ONeil.

See the original post here:
SPLC Pushes Big Tech Censorship in the Name of Fighting White Supremacy - PJ Media

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on SPLC Pushes Big Tech Censorship in the Name of Fighting White Supremacy – PJ Media

Is Hulu censoring the Iran episode of Anthony Bourdain’s ‘Parts Unknown’? – The Daily Dot

Posted: at 9:47 am

Claims have been circulating online this week that video streaming service Hulu has removed an episode of Anthony Bourdain: Parts Unknown centered on Iran.

A viral tweet alleged on Friday that Hulu users in the United States could no longer view the episode.

Hulu has blocked the Iran episode of Anthony Bourdains Parts Unknown from being viewed in the US, Twitter user @panarin_misha wrote.

Hulu has blocked the Iran episode of Anthony Bourdain's Parts Unknown from being viewed in the US

Users blamed the episodes alleged disappearance on everything from Hulus parent company Disney to the U.S. government, which is currently embroiled in tensions with Iran.

Hulu is owned by Disney, and Disney has a very specific history of doing stuff like this, Twitter user @film4brains added. Knew it was coming, effed up that theyre already allowed to do this

Hulu is owned by Disney, and Disney has a very specific history of doing stuff like this. Knew it was coming, effed up that they're already allowed to do this...

But it turns out that the claims arent exactly true. The episode, which originally aired in 2014 on CNN, was never offered on Hulus main service to begin with.

In a statement to the Hollywood Reporter, a Hulu spokesperson pointed to licensing rules as the reason why the episodes unavailable.

Hulu does not license Anthony Bourdain: Parts Unknown directlywe only receive the on-demand episodes that are provided by the network, the spokesperson told the Hollywood Reporter. This particular episode has never been made available to Hulu, but we would welcome it on our service if provided.

So where can the episode be watched? The show currently airs on Amazon and CNNgo and will soon be made available on HBO Max. Clips of the show can also be found on CNNs YouTube page as well.

Bourdain, who died in 2018 at the age of 61, described the Iranian people as overwhelmingly friendly following his visit.

This is not a black-and-white world, as much as people would like to portray it as such, Bourdain wrote at the time. Thats not an apology for anything. Im just saying that the brief, narrow slice of Iran we give you in this episode of Parts Unknown is only one part of a much deeper, multihued, very old and very complicated story.

And for those without access to the show, theres always Rick Steves Iran to provide a glimpse into Iranian life for free on YouTube.

READ MORE:

Originally posted here:
Is Hulu censoring the Iran episode of Anthony Bourdain's 'Parts Unknown'? - The Daily Dot

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Is Hulu censoring the Iran episode of Anthony Bourdain’s ‘Parts Unknown’? – The Daily Dot

Everyone and their brother was messaging me on Facebook. DNA tests reveal long-lost relatives, but the rest is a minefield – MarketWatch

Posted: January 17, 2020 at 3:45 am

For people like Cassandra Madison, direct-to-consumer genetic testing services from companies like 23andMe and Ancestry.com have proven revolutionary in filling gaps about their family history.

But connecting with biological relatives in cases of adoption or conception through sperm and egg donation doesnt come with a rule book forcing both parties to make difficult, emotional decisions, often on the fly.

Madison, who now lives in Virginia Beach, Va., was adopted as an infant in 1988 from the Dominican Republic by a white American couple. Throughout her life, Madison had little information about her biological family. My mom told me as much as she knew, which was just that they were very poor and couldnt afford to keep me anymore, Madison, 31, said.

Attempts to find more information on her own always proved fruitless. The lawyer in the Dominican Republic who handled Madisons adoption falsified paperwork and lied to adoptive parents about their childrens biological relatives, Madison said. It always became a dead end, Madison said.

Then one Christmas, Madisons mother gifted her with a 23andMe genetic test, so she could learn about her heritage. When she got her test results last January, she was surprised. I didnt know you could find people, she said.

Here is Cassandra Madison meeting her biological family:

When Madison clicked on her results to see her relatives, she found over 1,000 family members had taken the DNA test, which involves spitting in a test tube, including a cousin who lived in Connecticut.

She quickly went about researching him on Facebook FB, +0.28% and soon made contact. Low and behold, 20 minutes later everyone and their brother was messaging me on Facebook, Madison said. Months later, she made the trip down to the Caribbean country, meeting her relatives for the first-time in person.

Also read: 23andMe revealed that my daughter is not mine can I claim back child support from the biological father?

Genetic testing is fast becoming ubiquitous. As of 2018, around 60% of Americans with European heritage were likely identifiable from their DNA via searches of consumer websites from companies like 23andMe and Ancestry.com, regardless of whether they had ever taken a genetic test. One study estimated that around 100 million people will have their DNA mapped by one of these companies by 2021.

In situations where people were adopted or conceived with the assistance of a sperm or egg donor, the services from companies like 23andMe and Ancestry.com have removed the veil of secrecy that long existed over these relationships.

Dont miss: 23andMe can open a Pandoras Box of a familys medical secrets: As hard as it is knowing, not knowing is much worse

Consumer DNA tests have changed whos in power of the information, said Brianne Kirkpatrick, a certified genetic counselor and founder of the counseling firm Watershed DNA.

Historically, mothers typically were the only ones who knew the biological origins of their children. For decades, most adoptions were closed, meaning communication between the biological parents and their child was restricted. In many circumstances, their identities were also hidden.

Until recently, most sperm and egg donors made their donations under the expectation of anonymity.

For those who went through these procedures in the last few decades with the understanding that the donors would be anonymous the rules of the game have changed dramatically and donors are being identified and, in some cases, contacted whether or not they want to be, said Kim Kluger-Bell, a psychotherapist who specializes in infertility counseling. None of the fertility clinics or sperm banks I know of really anticipated this happening.

With so many people having taken tests already, it can be easy for some to find biological relatives. But that, too, can lead to awkward circumstances, particularly when someone connects with a relative other than their biological mother or father or vice-versa.

Ive heard stories of the parents of a sperm donor going on Ancestry.com and identifying a biological grandchild they never knew about it turned out their son had anonymously and privately donated sperm to a friend and agreed not to discuss the matter with anyone else, Kluger-Bell said. The parents of the donor wanted to contact the bio-grandchild and the parents of that child felt that this was completely inappropriate.

Ancestry.com and 23andMe have created resources for people who find themselves in these positions. There are certainly cases where a discovery might be quite unexpected. We take our responsibility towards our customers and the potential impact of complex discoveries very seriously, said Dana Chinnici, communications manager at Ancestry.

Both companies said they have experts on staff who can help customers work through some of the unexpected results they may encounter. 23andMe has a support page for customers and their family to navigate unexpected relationships, a company spokeswoman told MarketWatch.

Additionally, with both companies, customers can opt in or out of being listed as a match with other people.

When Madison was faced with the choice of reaching out to the relatives she connected with via DNA testing, she didnt hesitate. As kids we dont ask to be here, Madison reasoned.

Of course, that approach may not work for everyone. Experts who deal with situations involving adoption, and sperm or egg donation advised patience and caution when reaching out to relatives, but noted that theres not one correct approach.

There is no one size fits all scenario, said Amy Johnson Crow, a certified genealogist. Its important for the person making the contact to realize that the contact might not be welcomed. Although we all have a right to know our genetic history, we cannot force that biological parent to talk or to have a relationship.

Read more: I discovered through Ancestry.com that my biological father is someone else can I claim an inheritance as his heir?

Heres expert advice on the etiquette surrounding establishing contact:

Give the other person space: These revelations can have major ripple effects for other people, and so it may take time for the person to respond. Remember contact starts with knowing very little of each other and, like any other relationship, needs to grow and build over time. Genetics confers relatedness but not relationships, Braverman said.

Understand potential legal ramifications: Reaching out to a biological relatives through 23andMe or Ancestry.com could violate the terms of an adoption or sperm/egg donation agreement. One woman was threatened with a $20,000 fine after reaching out to the biological grandmother of her daughter who was born via sperm donation.

Establishing contact could leave you vulnerable to lawsuits, so before doing so its important to review the terms of these agreements in advance.

Consider hiring a professional: DNA tests are far from the only route toward discovering ones biological relatives. Genetic counselors and genealogists can assist in uncovering a persons family without these services. Moreover, these professionals can serve as an intermediary in establishing first contact with ones biological family. Kirkpatrick has served as an intermediary for clients in the past and said it can help slow down the process. Creating that buffer of space and time can ultimately lead to things going well in the end, she said.

An intermediary can also help in retrieving information from a biological relative, such as a family medical history, in instances where they do not desire further contact. Of course, this can come with trade-offs. Using an intermediary removes the pressure of an immediate response but also removes the real voice that is reaching out, Braverman said.

Keep your expectations in check: Having too high of expectations from the outset can easily lead to disappointment. To that end, experts suggested doing some self-reflection to understand what an adoptee or individual conceived via sperm or egg donation wants out of a possible connection, whether it be a relationship or something more simple like a family medical history.

Avoid making assumptions about what this biological relationship may mean to the other person, said Andrea Mechanick Braverman, a clinical professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Thomas Jefferson University.

When Madison eventually made contact with her biological family in the Dominican Republic, joy was quickly met with sadness. She found out that her birth mother had already passed away. Additionally, she also found that some of her relatives were more interested in how much money she had than in forming more meaningful relationships with her. For those and other reasons, Madison said she would not have been able to handle this whole experience without the support of a therapist.

Despite this, Madison said she doesnt regret taking the DNA test or establishing contact with her biological family. Im learning a whole other side of me and can embrace it, she said. It was the best thing to go down there and to have people say, Oh my God, you look just like your mother.

Read this article:
Everyone and their brother was messaging me on Facebook. DNA tests reveal long-lost relatives, but the rest is a minefield - MarketWatch

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Everyone and their brother was messaging me on Facebook. DNA tests reveal long-lost relatives, but the rest is a minefield – MarketWatch

Air Pollution, Evolution, and the Fate of Billions of Humans – The New York Times

Posted: at 3:45 am

The threat of air pollution grabs our attention when we see it for example, the tendrils of smoke of Australian brush fires, now visible from space, or the poisonous soup of smog that descends on cities like New Delhi in the winter.

But polluted air also harms billions of people on a continuing basis. Outdoors, we breathe in toxins delivered by car traffic, coal-fired plants and oil refineries. Indoor fires for heat and cooking taint the air for billions of people in poor countries. Over a billion people add toxins to their lungs by smoking cigarettes and more recently, by vaping.

Ninety-two percent of the worlds people live in places where fine particulate matter the very small particles most dangerous to human tissues exceeds the World Health Organizations guideline for healthy air. Air pollution and tobacco together are responsible for up to 20 million premature deaths each year.

Airborne toxins damage us in a staggering number of ways. Along with well-established links to lung cancer and heart disease, researchers are now finding new connections to disorders such as diabetes and Alzheimers disease.

Scientists are still figuring out how air pollution causes these ailments. They are also puzzling over the apparent resilience that some people have to this modern onslaught.

Some researchers now argue that the answers to these questions lie in our distant evolutionary past, millions of years before the first cigarette was lit and the first car hit the road.

Our ancestors were bedeviled by airborne toxins even as bipedal apes walking the African savanna, argued Benjamin Trumble, a biologist at Arizona State University, and Caleb Finch of the University of Southern California, in the December issue of the Quarterly Review of Biology.

Our forebears evolved defenses against these pollutants, the scientists propose. Today, those adaptations may provide protection, albeit limited, against tobacco smoke and other airborne threats.

But our evolutionary legacy may also be a burden, Dr. Trumble and Dr. Finch speculated. Some genetic adaptations may have increased our vulnerability to diseases linked to air pollution.

It is a really creative, interesting contribution to evolutionary medicine, said Molly Fox, an anthropologist at the University of California, Los Angeles, who was not involved in the new study.

The story begins about seven million years ago. Africa at the time was gradually growing more arid. The Sahara emerged in northern Africa, while grasslands opened up in eastern and southern Africa.

The ancestors of chimpanzees and gorillas remained in the retreating forests, but our ancient relatives adapted to the new environments. They evolved into a tall, slender frame well suited to walking and running long distances.

Dr. Finch and Dr. Trumble believe that early humans faced another challenge that has gone largely overlooked: the air.

Periodically, the savanna would have experienced heavy dust storms from the Sahara, and our distant ancestors may have risked harm to their lungs from breathing in the silica-rich particles.

When the dust is up, were going to see more pulmonary problems, Dr. Finch said. Even today, Greek researchers have found that when Sahara winds reach their country, patients surge into hospitals with respiratory complaints.

The dense foliage of tropical forests gave chimpanzees and gorillas a refuge from dust. But the earliest humans, wandering the open grasslands, had nowhere to hide.

Dust was not the only hazard. The lungs of early humans also may have been irritated by the high levels of pollen and particles of fecal matter produced by the savannas vast herds of grazing animals.

Dr. Finch and Dr. Trumble maintain that scientists should consider whether these new challenges altered our biology through natural selection. Is it possible, for instance, that people who are resilient to cigarette smoke have inherited genetic variants that protected their distant ancestors from cave fires?

One way to answer these questions is to look at genes that have evolved significantly since our ancestors moved out of the forests.

One of them is MARCO, which provides the blueprint for production of a molecular hook used by immune cells in our lungs. The cells use this hook to clear away both bacteria and particles, including silica dust.

The human version of the MARCO gene is distinctively different from that of other apes. That transformation happened at least half a million years ago. (Neanderthals carried the variant, too.) Breathing dusty air drove the evolution of MARCO in our savanna-walking ancestors, Dr. Finch and Dr. Trumble hypothesize.

Later, our ancestors added to airborne threats by mastering fire. As they lingered near hearths to cook food, stay warm or keep away from insects, they breathed in smoke. Once early humans began building shelters, the environment became more harmful to their lungs.

Most traditional people live in a highly smoky environment, Dr. Finch said. I think it has been a fact of human living for us even before our species.

Smoke created a new evolutionary pressure, he and Dr. Trumble believe. Humans evolved powerful liver enzymes, for example, to break down toxins passing into the bloodstream from the lungs.

Gary Perdew, a molecular toxicologist at Penn State University, and his colleagues have found evidence of smoke-driven evolution in another gene, AHR.

This gene makes a protein found on cells in the gut, lungs and skin. When toxins get snagged on the protein, cells release enzymes that break down the poisons.

Other mammals use AHR to detoxify their food. But the protein is also effective against some of the compounds in wood smoke.

Compared to other species, the human version produces a weaker response to toxins, perhaps because AHR protein is not the perfect protector the fragments it leaves behind can cause tissue damage.

Before fire, our ancestors did not need to use AHR very often; in theory, their bodies could tolerate the limited damage the protein caused.

But when we began breathing smoke regularly and needing the AHR protein constantly, the gene might have become dangerous to our health.

Dr. Perdew believes that humans evolved a weaker AHR response as a way to find a sweet spot, a compromise that minimized the damage of airborne pollutants without causing too many side effects.

These adaptations were never perfect, as evidenced by the fact that millions of people still die today from indoor air pollution. But evolution doesnt seek perfect health.

All that matters from an evolutionary standpoint is that you reproduce, Dr. Perdew said. If you die in your forties, so what? Its kind of a cold, heartless way to think about it, but it is what it is.

Our species arrived at the Industrial Revolution two centuries ago with bodies that had been shaped for millions of years by this highly imperfect process.

Clean water, improved medicines and other innovations drastically reduced deaths from infectious diseases. The average life expectancy shot up. But our exposure to airborne toxins also increased.

If we compressed the last five million years into a single year, it wouldnt be until Dec. 31, 11:40 p.m., that the Industrial Revolution begins, Dr. Trumble said. We are living in just the tiniest little blip of human existence, yet we think everything around us is whats normal.

The Industrial Revolution was powered largely by coal, and people began breathing the fumes. Cars became ubiquitous; power plants and oil refineries spread. Tobacco companies made cigarettes on an industrial scale. Today, they sell 6.5 trillion cigarettes every year.

Our bodies responded with defenses honed over hundreds of thousands of years. One of their most potent responses was inflammation. But instead of brief bursts of inflammation, many people began to experience it constantly.

Many studies now suggest that chronic inflammation represents an important link between airborne toxins and disease. In the brain, for example, chronic inflammation may impair our ability to clear up defective proteins. As those proteins accumulate, they may lead to dementia.

Pathogens can hitch a ride on particles of pollutants. When they get in our noses, they can make contact with nerve endings. There, they can trigger even more inflammation.

They provide this highway thats a direct route to the brain, Dr. Fox, of the University of California, Los Angeles, said. I think thats what makes this a particularly scary story.

Some genetic variants that arose in our smoky past may offer some help now. They might allow some people to live long despite smoking, Dr. Finch and Dr. Trumble suggest.

But the researchers have studied another gene for which the opposite seems to be true: a variant that was once helpful has become harmful in an age of rising air pollution.

The variant, ApoE4, first came to light because it drastically raises the risk of developing Alzheimers disease. More recently, researchers have also discovered that ApoE4 increases the risk that exposure to air pollution leads to dementia.

But these studies were restricted to industrialized countries. When researchers looked to other societies such as farmers in poor villages in Ghana, or indigenous forest-dwellers in Bolivia ApoE4 had a very different effect.

In these societies, infectious diseases remain a major cause of death, especially in children. Researchers have found that in such places, ApoE4 increases the odds that people will survive to adulthood and have children.

Natural selection may have favored ApoE4 for hundreds of thousands of years because of this ability to increase survival. But this gene and others may have had harmful side effects that remained invisible until the sooty, smoky modern age.

Read this article:
Air Pollution, Evolution, and the Fate of Billions of Humans - The New York Times

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Air Pollution, Evolution, and the Fate of Billions of Humans – The New York Times

Disorder May Be In Your DNA And Affecting Your Chance Of Surviving Cancer – IFLScience

Posted: at 3:45 am

If you stretched out the DNA in a single cell of your body, it would be approximately 2meters (6.6 feet) long, yet it packs into a space smaller than the width of a single hair. Just like travelers fitting their needs into a suitcase, some cells store the network of DNA, RNA, and proteins known as chromatin in ordered ways, while others are more chaotic. Sometimes which way a cell does it is a matter of life and death.

Professor Vadim Backman of Northwestern University compared the behavior of cells with neatly and messily packed DNA. In Science Advances, Backman reports that disorderly-packed cells are more flexible and can therefore better respond to external stresses that might otherwise damage them.

To be clear, Backman has not found any evidence that the status of your cell DNA is reflected in the tidiness of your possessions. Nevertheless, those of us who can't pack a bagneatly to save our lives might be high-fiving at the analogy: disorder wins, right? Not so fast. While the chaotic might have its advantages, chaotic evil is truly dangerous.

The problem, Backman has found, is cancer cells with disordered chromatin are more likely to survive chemotherapy and other treatments.

Cancer cells are masters of change, Backman said in a statement.They have to continuously adapt to evade the immune system, chemotherapies or immunotherapies. Abnormal chromatin packing drives cancer cells ability to do this.

In a sample of patients with lung, breast, and colon cancer, those whose tumor cells had neatly packed chromatin were more likely to beat the disease than those with more disordered malignancies.Knowledge is power, however. Backman's work could lead to treatments specifically targeted at cells with disorderly chromatin packing, or even ways to force cells to pack more neatly.

Those solutions are likely to be many years away. In the shorter term, simply knowing if a particular cancer's chromatin is disordered could help doctors assess the patient's survival prospects and choose the most appropriate option from existing treatments.

Backman believes he is revealing an understudied aspect of our biology. Genes are like hardware, and chromatin is software, he said. And chromatin packing is the operating system.

In the 67 years since the discovery of DNA's structure, we have made amazing advances not only in understanding our genes, but being able to edit them. The role of chromatin structure on gene expression, however, has remained a scientific mystery, the paper's co-author Professor Igal Szleifer added.

Two days after this publication, Backman had another paper in the same journal describing the tree-like folding structures chromatin uses to pack so much material into the cells' tiny spaces.

Visit link:
Disorder May Be In Your DNA And Affecting Your Chance Of Surviving Cancer - IFLScience

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Disorder May Be In Your DNA And Affecting Your Chance Of Surviving Cancer – IFLScience

Cracking a cold case: Meriden PD using DNA testing to find mother who left newborn to freeze to death in parking lot 32 years ago – WTNH.com

Posted: at 3:45 am

MERIDEN, Conn. (WTNH) A cold case has been haunting the Meriden Police Department for 32 years, but officers are hoping a new partnership and DNA testing may cause their trail to warm up.

The case involves newborn David Paul. Police said the baby was left to freeze to death in the AGC parking lot on Evansville Avenue.

He was found dead on Jan. 2, 1988. According to the Harford Courant, his umbilical cord was still dangling from his stomach.

Each year, the department holds a memorial service for David, who was named by local clergy.

But this year, the memorial has something that past services didnt have: hope.

On Monday, the department announced it has been working with DNA Doe Project, a California-based company, to try and find Davids mother.

The company specializes in trying to identify unidentified victims from older cases in which its difficult to obtain DNA.

The announcement comes as a ray of hope to residents who remember the day David was found.

Tammy Hoffman lived next to the lot where David was found. She said she still remembers officers knocking on her door that tragic day.

It was a knock at the door, and it was one of the police officers that was responding and making us aware of the fact that a baby had been abandoned in the lot next door to my house, she recalled to News 8.

After hearing the news, Hoffman said shes hoping it can bring an end to this cold case.

I never did give up hope DNA doesnt lie, Hoffman said. Many times it can lead to a happy reunion amongst family members; people you didnt even know you were related to. It can help you find out what your genetics are, and it can also find out who the bad guy was.

And she knows that finding that bad guy is a top priority for the department.

Many officers will have that one case that they just wish they couldve solved, and I know for a lot of members of our Meriden police department this is that one case.

According to the Courant, in 2001 police sent 13 pieces of evidence to the FBIs crime lab in Quantico, Va., for DNA analysis. Among them were the blankets David was found wrapped in that fateful day.

Investigators believe his mothers DNA could be on them and hope that new DNA technology can help identify and track her down.

See the original post here:
Cracking a cold case: Meriden PD using DNA testing to find mother who left newborn to freeze to death in parking lot 32 years ago - WTNH.com

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Cracking a cold case: Meriden PD using DNA testing to find mother who left newborn to freeze to death in parking lot 32 years ago – WTNH.com

Where to store all this intelligence data? How about DNA? – C4ISRNet

Posted: at 3:45 am

Data is a massive problem for the intelligence community. From the satellite images produced by the National Reconnaissance Office to the bulk communications data swept up by the National Security Agency, the intelligence community is collecting more information than ever before. But where to store it?

Data centers are massive warehouses and megawatts of power. The resource-intensive nature of these facilities makes them difficult to scale, and ultimately unprepared for a torrent of data.

Now, the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activitythe organization charged with tackling some of the intelligence communitys most difficult problemsthinks it has a solution: synthetic DNA. On Jan. 15, IARPA officially launched the Molecular Information Storage (MIST) program, an effort to use synthetic DNA to store exabytes (one million terabytes) of data.

IARPA has awarded multi-phase contracts to two teams pursuing a solution: up to $23 million for the Molecular Encoding Consortium and up to $25 million for Georgia Tech Research Institute.

The MIST program is a data storage moonshot to develop technologies that allow us to shrink an exabyte-scale data warehouse down to a tabletop form factor, with equally large reductions in operation and maintenance costs, said IARPA Program Manager David Markowitz. This would be a transformative capability for big data stakeholders in government and industry.

If successful, MIST will result in new devices capable of both writing data to and reading data from synthetic DNA media at scale. The goal is to make this technology commercially viable within three to five years.

To store data on synthetic DNA, digital files must first be converted from binary code to the format used for DNAsequences of A,C,T and G. DNA is then synthesized in short segments that are identified by a sort of barcode that identifies where that segment exists in relation to the entire sequence, allowing readers to recall or copy only the necessary data.

Know all the coolest acronyms Sign up for the C4ISRNET newsletter about future battlefield technologies.

Subscribe

Enter a valid email address (please select a country) United States United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of The Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

Thanks for signing up!

By giving us your email, you are opting in to the C4ISRNET Daily Brief.

With digital data growing at an exponential rate, there is increasing interest and excitement about using natures storage medium, DNA, to store digital data, said Emily Leproust, CEO and co-founder of Twist Bioscience, one of the companies working with the Georgia Tech Research Institute. With the governments commitment to fund this exciting new area of storage, we believe that as part of this consortium of specialists, we can truly revolutionize the DNA synthesis process, and reduce the cost of synthesis for DNA data storage by many orders of magnitude.

According to Twist Bioscience, the goal of their effort will be to create a device capable of writing enough synthetic DNA per day to reduce data storage costs to as low as $1 per gigabyte.

Fifty years ago, DNA data storage was considered science fiction today, it is science with a path toward broad implementation, Leproust said. We expect in the next three to five years, with the proper amount of government and industry investment, it will become a reality for long-term storage.

The Molecular Encoding Consortium is led by the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard and includes DNA Script and Professor Donhee Hams research group at Harvard University.

Meanwhile, the Georgia Tech Research Institute is teaming with the Twist Bioscience Corp., the University of Washington, Microsoft and Roswell Biotechnologies for their effort. These new systems will be tested independently by Los Alamos National Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories and the U.S. Army Research Laboratory .

Excerpt from:
Where to store all this intelligence data? How about DNA? - C4ISRNet

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Where to store all this intelligence data? How about DNA? – C4ISRNet

Epigenetic skincare can actually change your DNAheres what you need to know – Yahoo Lifestyle

Posted: at 3:45 am

As skincare aficionados, were always on the lookout for the next best thing in anti-aging. While we love bakuchiol, ceramides, and retinol as much as the next person, sometimes it seems like our skin just needs more. Feel the same? One solution is to turn your attention to epigenetic skincare.

If youre sitting here reading this thinking, epige-what? youre not alone. While epigenetic skincare still needs to be more heavily researched, according to FightAging.org, the general consensus according to is that, since most people experience the appearance of aging due to the same external factors (think: diet, sun exposure, and the like), its possible to study the epigenome to uncover the patterns that are linked with age. By uncovering these patterns, cosmetic chemists can develop products that interact epigenetically to deliver your youngest, most radiantly-looking complexion.

Sounds pretty dreamy, right? To learn more about the high-tech approach, sit down, mute your notifications, and get ready to soak in a whole lot of science in an effort to say hello to your most effective skincare routine.

What is epigenetic skincare?

First things first, lets talk epigenetics as a whole. Scientifically speaking, Olays Principal Scientist, Dr. Frauke Neuser explains that epigenetics describes the study of gene regulation and behavior which happen without any alteration of the genetic code (DNA) itself. In laymans terms, BeautyStats founder and CEO Ron Robinson says, epigenetics is the science behind the fact that environmental factors can affect the expression of genes.

To illustrate this idea, Neuser points out how the genes in the skin that are responsible for collagen production become less active with age, but can also become less active due to external factors, like sun exposure and air pollution. As such, Epigenetic skincare is based on the concept that skincare ingredients can affect gene behavior and counteract undesirable increases or decreases in activity by switching certain genes on or off (although turning genes up or down, like a dimmer light switch, might be the better analogy), he says.

How does epigenetic skincare work differently than traditional formulas?

In short, epigenetic skincare is designed to dive far beyond traditional formulas to not only affect the cellular level but the genetic one, too. While epigenetic concoctions complement traditional formulas, Neuser explains that certain skincare ingredients work directly on skins behavior and appearance while also having the potential to affect skin cells at the gene activity levelwhereas others might only do one or the other. It is usually a combination of ingredients that can achieve the best benefits, he adds. For example, about two years ago, Olay added a new ingredient (carob seed extract) to its Regenerist Micro-Sculpting Cream, accompanying already present niacinamide (vitamin B3) and peptides, based on gene activity studies that showed complementary effects. Clinical studies confirmed the desired anti-aging benefits.

Whats worth noting, however, is that even though brands (Olays not the only one) are uncovering the perks of epigenetic skincare, Robinson points out that theyre not actually allowed to claim that the products work on the genetic level, as that gets into drug territory as determined by the FDA. Thats why so many epigenetic formulations speak to the cosmetic benefits of the product, as opposed to genetic.

What are the benefits of epigenetic skincare?

Along with deep dives into the skin comes the ability to address complexion concerns from an all-encompassing stance. In theory, the idea is to help skin help itself by regulating processes that naturally occur in skin, as opposed to purely relying on extrinsic actives to help and improve skin health and appearance, Neuser says.

In December 2016, scientists at the Salk Institute in La Jolla, California, found that, after focusing on epigenetic markers and intermittently altering the genes in mice with progeria, a genetic disease that affects both animals and humans, mice appeared younger and healthier. While mice and humans are two very different things, the researchers concluded that it could lead to positive anti-aging effects for humans, too. (Though, they do note that more research is necessary to reach clinical trials.)

This work shows that epigenetic changes are at least partially driving aging, says Paloma Martinez-Redondo, a Salk Institute research associate and co-author of the study. It gives us exciting insights into which pathways could be targeted to delay cellular aging.

And the Salk scientists arent the only ones who have found promise with epigenetic research. In a September 2018 article published in the SOFW Journal, principal authors found that by targeting epigenetic mechanisms, specific anti-aging ingredients can positively affect the skin, essentially reversing the aging clock to make way for a younger-looking complexion.

Are there any downsides or side effects of using epigenetic skincare?

Downsides are largely undocumented given the shallow pool of research of epigenetic skincare. However, given its tailored directly towards specific genes that affect aging, and it requires elaborate research to even launch, consumers can typically have faith in a quality product that wont cause irritation when they do come across one.That said, its important to understand that creating epigenetic skincare products is a super complex process, so there arent tons of options on the market, in the first place.

At Olay, we have been studying gene activity in skin for over 20 years, because identifying individual genes among the tens of thousands of genes present in our skin cells, and understanding how they work and interact, is the first big step on the epigenetic skincare journey, Neuser explains. Highly complex and sophisticated methods are needed to study gene activity and make sure any changes measured are really relevant and significant.

With that in mind, below youll find four highly-rated epigenetic skincare products. While more science is necessary on the subject, we think the sky-high reviews make testing this seriously-scientific self-care well worth it.

With over 50 million jars sold, its safe to say this drugstore product is a must. Its made with vitamin B3, amino-peptides, hyaluronic acid, and antioxidants to address aging concerns topically and deep down10 layers to be exact. While they cant promise gene mutation, they do ensure a noticeable change in the appearance of your skin when used regularly for 28 days straight.

BABOR has done extensive epigenetic research to create their entire Skionvage system, which is focused on the brands Power Peptide to help the skin resist outside factors like sun exposure, pollution, and free radicals as a whole. This cream, in particular, is a dream for reactive skin types, as it reduces redness and calms the complexion on a deep level.

Courtesy of Augustinus Bader

Its important to remember that body care requires skincare too, after all, we do have skin on our bodies. The Augustinus Bader body cream fulfills the basic requirement of moisturizing skin, but what makes this anti-aging body product stand out is that it uses its epigenetic technology to target and treat stretch marks and cellulite with continued use.

Courtesy of Sisley Paris

With heavy research into behavioral aging, Sisley launched this anti-aging serum that tightens, lifts, and smooths skin for a younger-looking appeal. While the price is high, the reviews make it seem well worth it.

See more here:
Epigenetic skincare can actually change your DNAheres what you need to know - Yahoo Lifestyle

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Epigenetic skincare can actually change your DNAheres what you need to know – Yahoo Lifestyle

Page 1,407«..1020..1,4061,4071,4081,409..1,4201,430..»