Page 1,211«..1020..1,2101,2111,2121,213..1,2201,230..»

Category Archives: Transhuman News

25 cameras, drills and lasers: All you need to know about NASA’s new Mars rover – Hindustan Times Auto News

Posted: August 3, 2020 at 6:19 am

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) recently launched its fourth Mars rover, called Perseverance, in its latest effort to hunt for signs of ancient microbial life on the red planet and return samples to Earth by around 2031.

The six-wheeled car-sized vehicle is the biggest and heaviest Mars rover that NASA has ever built. It weighs 2,260 pounds (1,025 kilograms), is 10-feet long and has a top speed of just under 0.1-miles per hour. Its wheels are made of aluminum with titanium spokes. The plutonium-powered Perseverance is loaded with 25 cameras, a pair of microphones, drills and lasers, and is also carrying a small helicopter called Ingenuity under its belly.

(Also read: Tesla Model X unveiled as Astrovan with NASA badging for historic space mission)

The rover took off from Florida's Cape Canaveral Air Force Station atop an Atlas V rocket for its seven-month trip of 480-million-kilometre to Mars. It is expected to land in the red planet's Jezero Crater - a terrain that has an unexplored expanse of rocks dating back more than 3 billion years, on February 18, 2021. The rover's mission is to store 15-gram samples of those rocks in dozens of its super-sterilized titanium tubes.

When the Perseverance lands on Mars, NASA says, it will witness seven minutes of terror as it will go from 12,000 mph to a complete halt. Upon landing, the rover will release the helicopter mounted on it and also demonstrate NASA's new technology that converts carbon dioxide in Mars' atmosphere into oxygen. NASA says, this will pave way for future astronauts and help them breathe during their explorations.

Interestingly, the rover carries along a chunk of remembrances, etched on an aluminium plate attached to it. Over 10.9 million people signed up through NASA's public outreach program to have their names travel with the rover, CNET reported. There is also an illustration of the Earth, Sun and Mars along with a coded message that reads 'explore as one'. A separate aluminum plate pays tribute to health care workers for their work during coronavirus pandemic.

(Also read: How Tesla car parts are fueling Elon Musk's dreams of colonizing Mars)

Speaking of Ingenuity, it will make the first attempt at powered flight on another planet and NASA is hopeful that it could become a model for a new way to investigate other worlds. The previous Mars rovers launched by NASA are called Curiosity, Opportunity and Sojourner.

(With inputs from agencies)

Original post:
25 cameras, drills and lasers: All you need to know about NASA's new Mars rover - Hindustan Times Auto News

Posted in Mars Colonization | Comments Off on 25 cameras, drills and lasers: All you need to know about NASA’s new Mars rover – Hindustan Times Auto News

Mars Mission: Filling the Earth and Beyond – ChristianityToday.com

Posted: at 6:19 am

We live in an age of wonder when the boundaries of the earth seem to be more porous than ever before. Our reach extends beyond the atmosphere. We speak of earth as the ground we trod but also as a planet, a specific place in the heavens. What does it mean for us to fill the earth when we walk on another planet?

This morning NASA launched a new mission to Mars with a launch period. It has me thinking about our place in the world, our place among the worlds, and our neighbors in space.

The Mars 2020 mission will place a new rover on the surface of Mars by Feb. 18, 2021, if all goes according to plan. This mission takes the next step in searching for life and preparing for human space travel. The car-sized rover, named Perseverance, will resemble Curiosity, the rover that landed on Mars in 2012 and still remains active. It will have a whole new suite of instruments, however, and will land in an exciting new location: near the Jezero Crater, on the edge of Isidis Basin, which contains the remains of an ancient river delta. It will collect and package samples that can be returned to Earth by a future mission.

I believe that God calls us to explore space, to see what God has made, to share our love and wisdom, and to care for creation. But we cannot go alone. We travel with a host of other creaturesthe animals, plants, and even bacteria that live with us daily and keep us alive. God calls them as well, and we cannot understand our call until we understand theirs. Questions about the journey, where and when and how we go, involve other species. We cannot go alone, technically or morally. We take others with us. And that requires understanding our interdependence.

The exploration of Mars pushes us to the very limits of our technology as we attempt to discover new life, while keeping it separate from Earth life. NASA has detailed protocols for return samples, making sure that alien organisms, no matter how improbable, could not escape to harass us or our environment. NASA has already brought back samples from the Moon (Apollo 1117, 19691972), solar wind (Genesis, 2004) and comet Wild 2 (Stardust, 2006), as have Soviet missions (Luna 16, 20, and 24, 19701976). The Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) returned samples of asteroid Itokawa (Hayabusa, 2016). Both agencies have plans for future missions.

Lisa Pratt, a specialist in extreme biology, has the odd title of planetary protection officer (PPO). She certifies sample-return missions, making sure they meet national and international standards for safety. She ensures that scientists think through the details of contamination, plan properly, and install redundant safety measures. Mars sample return will get extra scrutiny because Mars has a better chance of harboring life than the Moon, comets, or asteroids. The principle remains the same: protect Earth from alien life.

Pratt has another responsibility. She protects Mars from Earth life. What if we found life on another planet only to discover we had brought it with us? Or, what if we destroyed the locals before we knew they existed? It would be a horrible lost opportunity. We would lose out scientifically, unable to study a new kind of life. We would lose out relationally, never knowing our neighbor. Space scientists care deeply about Mars and about learning all we can there.

Planetary protection involves protocols for sterilizing spacecraft before they leave Earth. Each of us walks around in a cloud of microbes, countless tiny organisms living around, on, and in us. These symbiotes live by the billions on every surface we touch. Like good neighbors, they rarely bother us. Often, they help us by digesting our food, keeping us healthy, and protecting us from other organisms. But what is good for us may not be good for Mars. Space engineers construct special clean rooms, where air and surfaces have been sterilized. They use heat, chemicals, and radiation to scrub away as much biology as they can while assembling spacecraft. They seal them in shells then launch those shells through the atmosphere to burn away any life that remains.

The PPO does not make these decisions alone. Planetary Protection was first established by the Outer Space Treaty in 1967. An international committee of scientists designs and reviews the policies that Pratt implements.

Even with all this caution, thousands of extreme organisms can survive the process. Adapted to survive decades of drought and famine on Earth, they can harden their surfaces and slow their metabolism, waiting for a warm, damp environment in which to grow. Even these organisms are unlikely to survive the cold, dry, radiation of space. And yet, just to be sure, we keep Earth robots away from Martian locales where liquid water may still flow. Ironically, we cannot search for life in the most promising places, places where we might destroy it.

Most space scientists agree that protecting Mars will become far more difficult, perhaps impossible, with a human mission. Millions of miles of void separate us from Mars. Our ingenuity is starting to bridge the gap, but we cannot neglect the ingenuity of our microbes. Bacteria have colonized Earth from the upper atmosphere to the deep subsurface. It seems inevitable that microbes will accompany us to Mars along with any plants and animals we bring intentionally.

The exploration of Mars pushes us to the edges of our theology as well. It brings us face to face with Gods command in Genesis 1:28 (NRSV): Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it. The first time I read this in the context of space exploration, I thought, Excellent. Mission accomplished. Humans have been fruitful and multiplied; we have filled the Earth. We are nearing eight billion people worldwide, 800 times as many as in the time of Jesus, much less Moses or Adam and Eve. Hardly a species has not been changed by our presence. We have domesticated many plants and animals, exiling countless more to nature reserves. We have changed the chemistry of sea and air so much that creatures in the farthest, deepest, widest wild have had to change their way of life. Truly, we cover the face of the Earth. Truly we have subdued it.

And then, a thought occurred to me. Are earth and Earth really the same? For most of Christian history, earth referred to the dirt below our feet, the land we inhabit, and the extent of humanity. It did not become a planet until the 16th century, when Copernicus named it one of the wandering stars. Earth became a proper noun. Which earth was God talking about? Shall we fill the heavens, with dominion over every rock in space, every patch of dirt? Or have we already achieved our goal?

On the fifth day, God made the creatures of sea and sky. God commanded them, saying, Be fruitful and multiply and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth. (Gen. 1:22) Is our earth their earth? Perhaps they were meant to fill the waters above as well as the waters below. The two commands come only six verses apart. Should they not be interpreted the same way? Job reminds us that God has plans for many species; and not all of them relate to humanity.

For me, space ethics is love of neighbor writ large. It seems abstract, though it becomes more concrete as we explore the solar system. It also provides context for decisions we make daily about other species on Earth. They are not just scenery, but fellow actorsif not equals then wards. The stage is surprisingly small, and the parts intertwine.

Some have argued that we should stay home for precisely this reason. In Religion and Rocketry, C. S. Lewis argued against space travel. We know we are fallen; why would we bring our fallenness to the stars? More recently, Christian and secular ethicists alike have urged us to wait, asking us to put our own house in order before heading out. Margaret McLean emphasizes our ecological responsibilities here on earth, while Lucianne Walkowicz highlights social responsibilities. De Witt Douglas Kilgore and Gabrielle Cornish explore the ways that nationalism, colonialism, and race shape our hopes for life in space. I share their caution, but I also have hope for the journey.

I believe in self-reflection and contemplation and changing myself before trying to change others. But I also know that I cannot make the change on my own. I need to help others, and I need others to help me. This applies to me personally, to my family, my nation, and even to the planet Earth. God calls us to seek and serve the other, even the alien other. And God calls us not just as individuals, but as members of a larger body. So, I think there is something to be said for space travel. Our wanderlust must be balanced by stewardship, but it will never go away. There is a come and see beyond our atmosphere, and we will not know what we went out to see until we see it. It may be alien life. It may only be a new appreciation for the life we bring with us.

Space science provides insights here as well. Since the Apollo missions, NASA has researched environmental control and life support systemscreating bubbles of Earth life beyond the Earth. On long-term missions, such as a human mission to Mars, it is impossible to imagine bringing enough food, air, and water for the journey. It would have too much mass to launch into space. It would take up too much volume in the spacecraft. That means we need to bring other organisms with us: bacteria, plants, and animals. Abiological systems have proven less efficient at recycling waste and maintaining the environment. Early work focused on plants like yams and lotus flowers to clean the air and water as well as provide calories for astronauts. Later researchers began to consider the role of insects and fish. More recently, we have learned to appreciate the efficiency and flexibility of bacteria. In addition to caring for our bodily symbionts, we can grow colonies that turn carbon dioxide and waste into clean air, clean water, and edible food.

Every pilgrimage reveals something about home. Thinking about systems in space helps us understand similar systems on Earth, how we depend on other species, and how they depend on us. It shows us that we are part of a larger whole and that God has a plan for all of it. Space travel reminds us of Gods care for the lily and the sparrow. It brings us face to face with a plan for salvation that does not end at humanity. Our final destination will be reached in community, one species among many amid worlds without end.

Lucas Mix studies the intersection of biology, philosophy, and theology. A writer, speaker, professor, and Episcopalian priest, he has affiliations at Harvard, the Ronin Institute, and the Society of Ordained Scientists. He is currently project coordinator at Equipping Christian Leadership in an Age of Science, supporting churches and Christian leaders using the best of science and theology. He blogson faith, science, and popular culture.

Here is the original post:
Mars Mission: Filling the Earth and Beyond - ChristianityToday.com

Posted in Mars Colonization | Comments Off on Mars Mission: Filling the Earth and Beyond – ChristianityToday.com

Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk rivalry: A history of their 15-year feud – Business Insider – Business Insider

Posted: at 6:19 am

Over the last 15 years, two of the world's most high-profile CEOs, Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos, have been engaged in a simmering rivalry.

The two execs have sparred over their respective space ambitions Musk runs SpaceX, while Bezos owns Blue Origin but it hasn't stopped there: Musk has called out Bezos for running what he deemed a monopoly, and has called Bezos a copycat for his self-driving car interests.

Musk and Bezos are two of the most powerful CEOs in the world. Bezos is currently the wealthiest living person and runs Amazon's sprawling empire while also involving himself in Blue Origin's quest to send people to the moon. Musk is a dual CEO, manning the ship at both Tesla and SpaceX. Over the years, their not-so-subtle rivalry has even given way to Twitter spats and name-calling.

Here's how Musk's and Bezos' rivalry began and everything that's happened since.

Go here to read the rest:
Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk rivalry: A history of their 15-year feud - Business Insider - Business Insider

Posted in Mars Colonization | Comments Off on Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk rivalry: A history of their 15-year feud – Business Insider – Business Insider

Elon Musk calls Jeff Bezos and Blue Origin too old and ‘too slow’ – Business Insider – Business Insider

Posted: at 6:19 am

Elon Musk has made another jab at Jeff Bezos, the latest escalation of a years-long feud between the two billionaires over their competing space ambitions.

Over the weekend, The New York Times' Maureen Dowd published a wide-ranging interview with Musk that touched on everything from his girlfriend, Grimes, and their new baby, X, to the coronavirus and Musk's wealth.

When discussing SpaceX, the space exploration company Musk leads that recently helped send astronauts into space, Bezos' name came up. Musk took the opportunity to make a dig at the Amazon CEO, who founded a reusable rocket company called Blue Origin, which hopes to send people to the moon.

Musk appeared to call Bezos too old and Blue Origin too slow to ever accomplish that goal.

"The rate of progress is too slow and the amount of years he has left is not enough, but I'm still glad he's doing what he's doing with Blue Origin," Musk said.

While Musk and Bezos mostly operate in different industries on Earth, the two moguls have been feuding over space for over 15 years. Bezos founded Blue Origin, in 2000, while Musk founded SpaceX in 2002. Things heated up two years later, when the pair met for dinner to discuss their space ambitions.

"I actually did my best to give good advice, which he largely ignored," Musk said after the meeting.

Things escalated in 2013, when SpaceX tried to get exclusive use of a NASA launch pad and Blue Origin (along with SpaceX rival United Launch Alliance) filed a formal protest with the government. Musk called it a "phony blocking tactic" and SpaceX eventually won the right to take over the pad. Months later, the two companies got into a patent battle, and soon after, Bezos and Musk took their feud public,trading barbson Twitter.

Bezos has frequently criticized the idea of colonizing Mars a main goal of SpaceX describing the idea as "un-motivating." Once, when the BBC asked Musk about Bezos, he responded, "Jeff who?"

More recently, Musk has called Amazon a monopoly and tweeted that it should be broken up. He's also called Bezos a copycat for Amazon's plan to launch internet-beaming satellites and for acquiring self-driving-taxi company Zoox, as both are industries Musk currently operates in.

See original here:
Elon Musk calls Jeff Bezos and Blue Origin too old and 'too slow' - Business Insider - Business Insider

Posted in Mars Colonization | Comments Off on Elon Musk calls Jeff Bezos and Blue Origin too old and ‘too slow’ – Business Insider – Business Insider

Why Tesla has a huge lead over its competition: Branding and Elon Musk – Business Insider

Posted: at 6:19 am

In the car business, it's often said that brands are grand, but products pay the bills. In other words, you can capture or retain customers with what your company stands for, but long-term, if you don't have great vehicles, you're going to have a problem.

For almost its entire history, more than 15 years, Tesla has inverted that wisdom. A few years ago, the carmaker was barely selling any vehicles relative to its global competitors. Last year, Tesla delivered only about 250,000 vehicles, while General Motors sold almost 8 million.

Investors have decided that this means Tesla should be worth $300 billion in market capitalization, more valuable than GM, Ford, and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles combined and topping Volkswagen and Toyota, the two biggest automakers on Earth.

Vehicle sales obviously don't add up to $300 billion in value; Tesla's quarterly revenue remains far below a Detroit Big Three car company. It's a bet on the future, and a prediction that Tesla should be able to expand its near-monopoly of the EV market as that market grows from a currently tiny basis, merely 1-2% of worldwide sales.

Investor optimism is that Tesla will maintain a dominant share, increase it scale, and notch enviable profit margins, perhaps more than 10% (high-volume luxury carmakers operate at that level, while mass-market companies run in the single-digit range).

But for now, the Tesla brand is mighty. Here's how that happened:

Read this article:
Why Tesla has a huge lead over its competition: Branding and Elon Musk - Business Insider

Posted in Mars Colonization | Comments Off on Why Tesla has a huge lead over its competition: Branding and Elon Musk – Business Insider

Revealing the intrinsic functioning of human and mouse genomes – Tech Explorist

Posted: July 31, 2020 at 6:51 pm

The Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) Consortium is a universal coordinated effort of research groups funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). The objective of ENCODE is to make a comprehensive parts list of functional elements in the human genome, including elements that work at the protein and RNA levels, and regulatory elements that control the cells and conditions where a gene is active.

The project will detail how the human genome functions. Recently, the project completed its latest phase- scientists have added millions of candidate DNA switches from the human and mouse genomes. These genomes appear to control when and where genes are turned on, and a new registry that assigns a portion of these DNA switches to useful biological categories.

It also provides the latest visualization tools to help in the use of ENCODEs large datasets.

NHGRI Director Eric Green, M.D., Ph.D. said,A major priority of ENCODE 3 was to develop means to share data from the thousands of ENCODE experiments with the broader research community to help expand our understanding of genome function. ENCODE 3 search and visualization tools make these data accessible, thereby advancing efforts in open science.

To evaluate the potential functions of various DNA locales, ENCODE specialists considered biochemical procedures that are normally connected with the switches that regulate genes. This biochemical methodology is an effective method to investigate the whole genome wholly and quickly.

This strategy assists with finding regions in the DNA that are candidate functional elements DNA regions that are anticipated to be practical components dependent on these biochemical properties. Candidates would then be able to be tested in further experiments to distinguish and portray their useful roles in gene regulation.

Elise Feingold, Ph.D., scientific advisor for strategic implementation in the Division of Genome Sciences at NHGRI and a lead on ENCODE for the institute, said,A key challenge in ENCODE is that different genes and functional regions are active in different cell types. This means that we need to test a large and diverse number of biological samples to work towards a catalog of candidate functional elements in the genome.

During the recently completed third phase of ENCODE, scientists performed almost 6000 experiments in several biological contexts- 4,834 in humans and 1,158 in mice- to enlight details of the genes and their potential regulators in their respective genomes.

Scientists studied developing embryonic mouse tissues to comprehend the timeline of various genomic and biochemical changes that occur during mouse development.

Scientists analyzed how chemical modifications of DNA, proteins that bind to DNA, and RNA (a sister molecule to DNA) interact to regulate genes. Results from ENCODE 3 also help explain how variations in DNA sequences outside of protein-coding regions can influence the expression of genes, even genes located far away from a specific variant itself.

Brenton Graveley, Ph.D., professor and chair of the Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences at UCONN Health, said,The data generated in ENCODE 3 dramatically increase our understanding of the human genome. The project has added tremendous resolution and clarity for previous data types, such as DNA-binding proteins and chromatin marks, and new data types, such as long-range DNA interactions and protein-RNA interactions.

As a new feature, ENCODE 3 scientists created a resource detailing different kinds of DNA regions and their corresponding candidate functions. A web-based tool called SCREEN(link is external) allows users to visualize the data supporting these interpretations.

The projects latest results were published in Nature, accompanied by 13 additional in-depth studies published in other major journals.

Link:
Revealing the intrinsic functioning of human and mouse genomes - Tech Explorist

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on Revealing the intrinsic functioning of human and mouse genomes – Tech Explorist

California and Zuckerberg lab team up to map coronavirus genome, one of the largest efforts to discover how it spreads – San Francisco Chronicle

Posted: at 6:51 pm

Health officials and scientists believe genome sequencing of the coronavirus could hold great promise. The technique today helps trace where infections began, and perhaps one day it could help shape the way doctors treat COVID-19 patients.

A new initiative between California and the San Francisco research institution funded by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerbergs philanthropic organization could bring them one step closer.

The Chan Zuckerberg Biohub will offer free genome sequencing for lab samples that have tested positive for the coronavirus from all California counties, the institution is slated to announce Thursday.

It is one of the largest statewide, coordinated efforts to do genome sequencing for COVID-19, said Dr. Joe DeRisi, co-president of the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub. Genome sequencing helps determine what strain of the virus people have, which helps public health officials trace how transmission occurred and where it came from.

The Biohub had already been doing genome sequencing on samples from many California county public health departments on a smaller scale since March. Now, it is formally partnering with the state Department of Public Health to expand the work.

Sequencing is not necessary for all samples, but can be useful to determine the source of an outbreak in some settings or to rule out a suspected pattern of transmission. For example, if sequencing found that similar strains of the virus are rampant at two different nursing homes, and the two facilities share staff, that may indicate a staffer brought the virus from one home to the other. Or if one factory employee has a strain that is similar to that of a coworker, it may indicate the virus spread at work; but if strains found in one workplace are vastly different, it indicates the employees likely got sick from interactions outside of work.

Where its the most helpful is understanding the number of circulating strains in a given community, to understand if theres been a new introduction of a strain to a particular geographic area or facility, DeRisi said. That establishes whether youre looking at ongoing, in-community transmission, or whether theres been an outside introduction that was unbeknownst to you.

Sequencing involves putting a sample that has tested positive for the coronavirus into a lab machine that analyzes the viral genetic material and identifies where mutations occur.

A strain is a group of viruses with similar mutations. SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, has 30,000 letters of RNA, genetic material that includes instructions on how to make new copies of the virus. When the virus spreads from cell to cell and person to person, it passes on small changes, or mutations, in the viral information. Some of those mutations are then passed on to the next person. A strain is a product of a long chain of transmission, and the cumulative changes that occurred over time.

The Biohub will not sequence every single sample. But it will sequence samples when the work can help answer critical questions about some outbreaks and how they started. Biohub has sequenced about 1,600 samples from nursing homes, packing plants and prisons from 20 California counties. It is sequencing samples from San Quentin State Prison to determine whether the outbreak there came in from one source and then spread, or if it came in from multiple sources carrying different strains.

Sequencing has helped scientists determine that the East Coast has largely been hit with a European strain of the virus, while California has been hit by many strains, including from Europe and China.

One of the potential promises of genome sequencing is that it could eventually help scientists learn whether certain strains of the coronavirus are resistant to certain drugs. That could help doctors pick which drugs, or cocktail of drugs, to administer to patients. With HIV, for instance, sequencing helped researchers glean that some strains of the virus respond well to certain drugs while other strains are resistant to the same drugs.

Ultimately, we might be able to use this data for things like susceptibility to drugs or a vaccine, said Dr. Robert Siegel, a Stanford infectious disease expert. Were not there yet.

It is too early with the coronavirus to know whether some strains are resistant to drugs. There have not been many drugs that have successfully treated COVID-19. But a few, including remdesivir, appear to help some very sick patients.

Imagine that you took all the patients on remdesivir, and you had good clinical data on them, and it turns out some people responded to remdesivir and some didnt, Siegel said. Its possible that is either a function of the viral strain or of the genetic makeup of the host, or a combination of the two. Or it could be luck. ... If we started seeing remdesivir resistance, almost certainly wed be able to tell what mutations gave rise to remdesivir resistance.

It costs about $15 to $20 to sequence each sample, DeRisi said.

The sequencing will be done at a lab at the Biohub, which is financed by the philanthropic organization Chan Zuckerberg Initiative in San Franciscos Mission Bay. The initiative was created in 2015 by Zuckerberg and his wife Dr. Priscilla Chan, who pledged $600 million over 10 years to help advance medical research.

The initiative has also committed $13.6 million to fund large, long-term COVID-19 studies in the Bay Area and a $4 million UCSF lab to process coronavirus tests.

Catherine Ho is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: cho@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @Cat_Ho

Here is the original post:
California and Zuckerberg lab team up to map coronavirus genome, one of the largest efforts to discover how it spreads - San Francisco Chronicle

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on California and Zuckerberg lab team up to map coronavirus genome, one of the largest efforts to discover how it spreads – San Francisco Chronicle

‘Genome-tuning’ biotech Omega Therapeutics snags $85M as it aims for the clinic – FierceBiotech

Posted: at 6:51 pm

Less than a year after launch, Omega Therapeutics is getting an $85 million (PDF) cash boost. It will push a pipeline of treatments toward the clinic as well as bankroll the identification of new targets for genomic medicines.

We had founded Omega with a long-term vision to create a controllable epigenomic programming platform, Omega CEO Mahesh Karandetold Fierce Biotech. Rather than switching genes on and off, cutting out disease-causing genes or replacing them with healthy versions, Omegas platform is designed to adjust gene expression to healthy levels.

The companys work is based on neighborhoods of genes and their regulatory elements found in loops of DNA called Insulated Genomic Domains (IGDs). These loops occur because long strands of DNA need to fit into the cells nucleus.

In nature, generally things are not all the way on or all the way off, but rather turned to a very specific range in a healthy setting, Omega Chief Scientific Officer Thomas McCauley, Ph.D., said in a previous interview. Omegas epigenomic controllers are designed to target the right place on specific IGDs to restore gene function at the right level, he said.

Since launch, Omega has been workingto figure out which neighborhoods play a role in different diseases.

RELATED: Flagship unveils 'genome-tuning' biotech Omega Therapeutics

We could have gone in various directions, Karande said. But Omega landed on a handful of areas. Its advancing five programs spanning oncology and inflammation as well as autoimmune, metabolic and raregenetic diseases, the first of which should hit the clinic in 2021.

In addition to tweaking gene expression without making permanent changes to the genome, Omegas approach offers advantages over a small-molecule approach to epigenetics.

There are a number of companies developing small-molecule therapies for epigenetic targets, almost exclusively in cancer, McCauley.

The issue is really specificity, in having those molecules go everywhere in the body as opposed to having them go to specific cell types and specific locations in the genome, McCauley continued, adding that the benefits of such treatments might outweigh the risks in oncology but that this risk-benefit profile may be unacceptable in other diseases.

In its first efforts, Omega is going after targets with links to specific diseases that are well understood, McCauley said. Moving forward, it will take advantage of the lessons it learns to look for new targets.

Were looking for the ability to expand laterally, he added.

One of those lateral expansions could be into COVID-19. Since inflammation plays a big role in COVID-19 infection, Omega could leverage the work its already done in that space to quickly move into drug development against the new coronavirus.

Right now, it's all systems go with its fivepotentially sixprograms. Karande said the company would be "remiss" if it did not ink partnerships.

"We are absolutely open to partnering with people. We have a robust discovery platform that has many, many more targets in the pipeline, so yes, partnering is definitely in the cards for us," he said.

Go here to read the rest:
'Genome-tuning' biotech Omega Therapeutics snags $85M as it aims for the clinic - FierceBiotech

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on ‘Genome-tuning’ biotech Omega Therapeutics snags $85M as it aims for the clinic – FierceBiotech

University of Regina led genome capture project aims to detect COVID-19 or anything else that ails you – Prince Albert Daily Herald

Posted: at 6:51 pm

Dr. Andrew Cameron a microbial geneticist with the university of Regina, together with Manitobas Cadham Provincial Laboratory and Saskatchewans Roy Romanow Provincial Laboratory, received funding to lead Genome Prairies COVID-19 Rapid Regional Response (COV3R) project.

The COV3R team also includes members of the Institute for Microbial Systems and Society at the University of Regina where Cameron is co-director, as well as the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control.

Co-infection is a problem because any time your body has to fight multiple infectious diseases, it can compromise the ability of your immune system to protect you, Cameron said,

Genome Prairie provided $240,000 in funding for the project, and the Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation (SHRF) contributed $50,000, while the Centre for Disease Control in B.C., the Roy Romanow Provincial Laboratory in Saskatchewan, and the Cadham Provincial Laboratory in Manitoba provided in-kind support.

Using genome capture, the COV3R initiative aims to tackle the problem of detecting co-infections in humans, and in the process provide powerful new tools for public health.

Co-infection by respiratory pathogens is bad for patients, yet we know very little about co-infection in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Integrating the genomic detection of respiratory viruses and bacteria to better understand the severity of COVID-19 infection will directly and immediately improve public health interventions and clinical treatment plans,Cameron explained.

This technique will also give researchers the ability to test for all viral groups, even those scientists dont yet know about.

Misdiagnosis is a problem with infectious diseases because of the limited number of signs and symptoms that people experience such as a fever, a sore throat, and a headache. So even in the modern day with all our advanced techniques, we still sometimes attribute disease to the wrong culprit.

Cameron says that genome capture can help in diagnosing infectious diseases by adding a powerful tool for provincial public health testing labs.

Our work with genome capture will directly complement genetic sequencing of 150,000 coronaviruses as part of Genome Canadas Canadian COVID-19 Genomics Network (CanCOGeN) initiative, he said.

We will sequence coronavirus genomes along with co-infecting viruses, then can examine the Manitoba and Saskatchewan coronavirus infections in broader provincial, national, and international contexts through integration with CanCOGeN.

Another key feature of genome capture testing is that it offers the ability to track viruses by their unique genetic makeup. This allows public health officials to compare, for example, coronavirus causing COVID-19 cases in different parts of a province or region with virus strains from elsewhere to find out where the disease is coming from and how its moving through communities.

The COV3R team is also developing a unique tool that efficiently captures genetic material and compares it against all coronaviruses known to infect animals, which will be a valuable asset in the current pandemic and for early detection of coronavirus pathogens in the future.

Whole genome sequencing is revolutionizing epidemiology. This technology has the potential to discover so much. With it, we might find something circulating here that we didnt know we had. No other technology comes close, Cameron said.

The technology will also address the added problem of what the pandemic is doing to testing capacity.

Laboratories, and the experts who run them, are flooded with COVID-19 testing, forcing them to reduce testing for other respiratory pathogens. This means information about other diseases in Canada is being missed at the moment because COVID-19 is the priority, says Cameron. Our project will help to address this gap.

Dr. Gerald Brown, Genome Prairies interim President and CEO, says Genome Prairie is thrilled to be supporting the research teams work.

The COV3R project represents our organizations ability to bring together the best researchers in our Prairie provinces to respond rapidly and effectively to an emerging issue, Brown said.

Dr. Kathleen McNutt, VicePresident (Research) at the University of Regina, says without this work the people of Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and B.C. will likely be hit even harder by the coronavirus, especially in the fall when cold and flu season re-emerges.

Thanks to the support from Genome Prairie and SHRF, the work that Dr. Cameron and the COV3R team are doing is poised to make a dramatic difference in detecting COVID-19, and a multitude of other viruses and bacteria that are yet unknown, McNutt said.

It is not an overstatement to say this research is a matter of life and death.

SHRF CEO Patrick Odnokon says SHRF has been a strong supporter of Cameron and his team since 2013, including earlier work evaluating whole genome sequencing to enhance our understanding of disease transmission.

Dr. Cameron is a perfect example of the expertise that exists in Saskatchewan to seek solutions to health challenges faced by our province and across the globe. The impact of this work will not only benefit public health during the current pandemic, but it will demonstrate what is possible when we nurture and support home-grown talent and collaboration to prepare for potential health crises in the future.

View original post here:
University of Regina led genome capture project aims to detect COVID-19 or anything else that ails you - Prince Albert Daily Herald

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on University of Regina led genome capture project aims to detect COVID-19 or anything else that ails you – Prince Albert Daily Herald

From rare diseases to Covid-19: charting the history of Genomics England – Pharmaceutical Technology

Posted: at 6:51 pm

]]]]]]>]]]]>]]> How can genomics help tackle the Covid-19 pandemic? Credit: Shutterstock.

Sign up here for GlobalData's free bi-weekly Covid-19 report on the latest information your industry needs to know.

In 2003, after 13 years of work and more than 2bn spent, scientists involved in the Human Genome Project mapped the first complete genetic code, or genome, of a human being. This was a huge scientific breakthrough and taught genetics researchers a lot about human genes, the genome and how they interact with health and disease.

As further genomics work was undertaken over the next decade or so, it became evident that genome sequences are most useful when combined with other data about the person who donated their sequence, such as physiological measurements and their past medical records of previous illness and prescribed medication.

By joining up these dots, genomic medicine has the potential to improve understanding about the underlying causes of genetic diseases and predict how a person could respond to certain treatments, helping to find personalised approaches for each individual patient, as well as determining what diseases people are at risk of developing in the future.

With this in mind, the UK Government created Genomics England to coordinate work in the field. Having a centralised approach also mitigates some security concerns around the storage and use of patients incredibly private health data. The UK is an excellent location to push genomics forward. Not only does the country have a strong genetics heritage two British scientists, James Watson and Francis Crick, discovered the double helix structure of DNA in the 1950s but it has a unique resource in the National Health Service (NHS), one of the worlds largest single-payer healthcare systems in the world.

Initially focused on cancer and rare diseases known to have genetic elements, Genomics England has now diversified to look at how genomics can help track the spread of infectious disease. The organisation has joined a national consortium looking to leverage genomics to better tackle the Covid-19 pandemic. The UK has been hit extremely hard by the pandemic so far according toJohn Hopkins Covid-19 map, the UK has the second-highest number of deaths globally.

Before looking at the latest project, its important to reflect on Genomics Englands foundation and mission.

Genomics England was established in 2013 by the Department of Health and Social Care to deliver the 100,000 Genomes Project, which was launched by former Prime Minister David Cameron in late 2012.

Backed by more than 300m in government funding, the 100,000 Genomes Project aimed to create a foundation for a new era of personalised medicine within the NHS by sequencing 100,000 whole genomes from 70,000 patients with rare diseases and cancers.

To support Genomics England with recruitment for the project, NHS England set up 11 Genomic Medicines Centres (GMCs); now there are 13 in England as well as a few more in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland as they got on board with the project in the mid-2010s. The GMCs also helped with finding the clinical information needed to inform better interpretation of each persons genome sequence.

From the outset, Genomics England was very aware that it would need to build its own technology to complete the 100,000 Genomes Project. The company decided the best way to do this was to work with innovators in the genomics and sequencing space.

Genomics Englands first partnership was signed with California-headquartered Illumina to develop a sequencing infrastructure. As part of the deal, Illumina invested 162m in this work in the UK over the next four years.

In addition, as part of its 1bn commitment to the UKs genomics industry, the Wellcome Trust agreed to spend 27m on a world-class sequencing hub just outside Cambridge to house Genomics Englands operations. This gave the 100,000 Genomes Project easy access to world leaders in the genomics space, such as the European Bioinformatics Institute and the Sanger Institute.

Within two years of the launch, ten companies moved to collaborate with Genomics England to support and further accelerate the 100,000 Genomes Project. These companies, which included GSK, AstraZeneca, UCB, AbbVie, Roche and Takeda, established the Genomics Expert Network for Enterprises (GENE) Consortium; Big Pharma had to contribute 250,000 to the project in funding to collaborate. The aim was to carry out a year-long industry trial of select whole-genome sequences to establish how industry could leverage the learnings from the 100,000 Genomes Project into drug discovery and development. This initiative was renamed the Discovery Forum in 2017.

Simultaneously, Genomics England launched its Clinical Interpretation Partnership (GeCIP) to find ways to work with clinicians and researchers to directly bring the benefit of the 100,000 Genomes Project to drive diagnosis.

As part of a pilot scheme under the 100,000 Genomes Project, Newcastle University and Hospitals used whole-genome sequencing to reveal that a patients kidney failure was due to a rare genetic variant; this explains why his father, brother and uncle had all died of the same condition.

This diagnosis using genome sequencing meant that the patient could receive personalised treatment for this specific condition. Also, his family members could be tested to find out if they were affected by the same rare genetic kidney disease, rather than face a lifetime of uncertainty.

Hot on the heels of the first patients diagnosed, two children became the first to be genetically diagnosed through the 100,000 Genomes Project via Great Ormond Street Hospital in London. Both have rare, undiagnosed and unknown medical conditions, but due to whole-genome sequencing doctors now know the genetic changes responsible for their conditions.

NHS chief scientific officer Professor Dame Sue Hill said: This is an excellent example of how whole-genome sequencing can finally provide the answers that families have been seeking out for years. This new insight sets them free to make decisions about the treatment options for their child and how they move forward with future plans for their family.

One of the biggest challenges facing delivery of the 100,000 Genomes Project early on was to create a bioinformatics pipeline to analyse and interpret the genomics data. To this end, Genomics England decided to expand its sequencing partnership with Illumina to create informatics tools for use at the NHS GMCs and GeCIP.

This was followed later in 2016 by a deal signed with Ohio-based GenomOncology to improve clinical reporting, particularly in clinical trials, for the 100,000 Genomes Project cancer programme.

In early 2018, Genomics England and the Department of Health and Social Care announced 50,000 whole genomes had been sequenced.

This put Genomics England on track to finish recruitment and scale up operations so the full project could be completed on time by the end of 2018.

As the 100,000 Genomes Project came closer to completion, the newly appointed Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Matt Hancock announced a roadmap for honouring its legacy through continuing work on genomics medicine in the NHS.

Hancock committed to sequencing five million whole genomes by 2024 and bringing access to genetic and genomic testing into mainstream clinical practice through theNHS Genomic Medicine Service. Initially it will focus on cancer and rare diseases, like the 100,000 Genomes Project, but it is expected to evolve and expand to other therapeutic areas as the technology becomes more advanced.

At the same time, Genomics England signed a research agreement with life sciences technology vendor IQVIA. This partnership involves the pair running analytics on patient-consented, de-identified data from the 100,000 Genomes Project to drive more efficient drug research and development, particularly in the field of personalised medicine. These insights could be used by IQVIAs life science customers in parallel with their clinical development programmes.

Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Matt Hancock announced in mid-December 2018 that the 100,000 Genome Project had been completed.

Genomics England chair Sir John Chisholm noted: At launch the 100,000 Genomes Project was a bold ambition to corral the UKs renowned skills in genomic science and combine them with the strengths of a truly national health service to propel the UK into a global leadership position in population genomics.

With this announcement, that ambition has been achieved. The results of this will be felt for many generations to come as the benefits of genomic medicine in the UK unfold.

This project led to one in four participants with rare diseases receiving a diagnosis for the first time, while transforming treatment for up to half of cancer patients who participated.

Although launched at the end of 2018, the NHS Genomic Medicine Service was only expected to be operational in mid-2020.

To allow the new service to hit the ground running, Genomics England expanded its sequencing partnership with Illumina to focus on the next 300,000 whole genomes. All clinical samples for the collaboration will be provided through the NHS Genomic Medicine Service.

This follows the late-2018 deal with Congenica to support clinicians to make informed medical decisions based on insights from whole-genome sequencing. Congenica had previously provided similar sequencing services to the 100,000 Genomes Project.

Although Genomics England has primarily focused on cancer and rare diseases, it is clear that insights from genomics also have a role to play in tackling infectious disease.

In the context of the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, which has killed more than 40,000 people in the UK to date, Genomics England is carrying out a whole-genome study of 35,000 people with either severe, moderate or mild Covid-19 symptoms to try and discover why this viral disease has such a varied impact on patients.

Genomics England will read the data from entire genomes of those who have been most severely impacted by Covid-19 and compare them to those who only experienced mild symptoms; this genomics data will also be enriched by clinical insights into participants.

The company is working with the GenOMICC consortium, Illumina, the NHS and the University of Edinburgh to carry out this study. The project is backed by 28m in funding from UK Research and Innovation, the Department of Health and Social Care and the National Institute for Health Research.

The aim is for this human genomic data to be linked to the virus genome data being sequenced by the COVID-19 Genomics UK Consortium (COG-UK), which is led by the NHS and the Sanger Institute. This would help to improve insights into how the two genomes interact and affect how the patient responds to the infection, which can feed into better knowledge about promising treatments for clinical trials and practice.

Read more:
From rare diseases to Covid-19: charting the history of Genomics England - Pharmaceutical Technology

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on From rare diseases to Covid-19: charting the history of Genomics England – Pharmaceutical Technology

Page 1,211«..1020..1,2101,2111,2121,213..1,2201,230..»