Page 101«..1020..100101102103..110120..»

Category Archives: Transhuman News

Welcome to the UNC Department of Genetics | Department of Genetics

Posted: February 5, 2023 at 9:35 am

Fernando PardoManuel-de-VillenaChairProfessorUNC Department of Genetics

The mission of the department is to provide basic and applied genetic/genomic research, education and training at the interface between biology, chemistry, physics, computer science, mathematics, the social sciences, public health and medicine in order to have a profound effect on how medicine will be practiced in the future.

Our graduate programs train students to be creative, sophisticated research scientists prepared to pursue careers focused in genetics and genomics working in academic science, government, or commercial positions. Students conduct their dissertation research using diverse experimental approaches from classical genetics to the most modern molecular methods to address a broad range of contemporary problems in biomedical science.

The Department also includes a clinical arm focused on medical genetics, which covers the broad spectrum of clinical genetic research from disease prevention to diagnosis and treatment. This specialty includes evaluation, mutation discovery, counseling and risk assessment through analysis and genetic testing. Locating the clinical group alongside basic scientists facilitates integration of cutting edge genetic research with patient care.

View post:
Welcome to the UNC Department of Genetics | Department of Genetics

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on Welcome to the UNC Department of Genetics | Department of Genetics

Global Genetically Modified Crops Market Is Projected To Grow At A 6% Rate Through The Forecast Period – EIN News

Posted: at 9:35 am

Global Genetically Modified Crops Market Is Projected To Grow At A 6% Rate Through The Forecast Period  EIN News

See the rest here:
Global Genetically Modified Crops Market Is Projected To Grow At A 6% Rate Through The Forecast Period - EIN News

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on Global Genetically Modified Crops Market Is Projected To Grow At A 6% Rate Through The Forecast Period – EIN News

4 Problems with Transhumanism – Human Life International

Posted: February 2, 2023 at 11:49 pm

Most transhumanists emphasize only the benefits that their movement would supposedly bring to the human race. Perhaps they omit possible problems because, like all Culture of Death movements, they lack even the most fundamental understanding of human nature. So their primary problem seems to be not dishonesty, but ignorance.

Ever since humanitys beginnings, we seem to have possessed an innate capability to murder each other. This urge manifests itself in many ways. For example, we first thoroughly examine any emerging technology in order to assess its potential to either wage war or to support it (although to be fair, an amazing number of inventions have emerged from war-related research).These inventions and techniques include computers, nuclear power, tracked vehicles, flashlights, practical jet engines, air traffic control, radar, radio navigation, synthetic rubber and oil, pressurized cabins for aircraft, drones, and countless medical advances such as penicillin and mobile X-ray machines.

Some transhumanists recognize this danger: Julian Savulescu, Director of The Oxford Center for Neuroethics, believes that making humans much more intelligent will endanger our race because of our propensity to evaluate new tech as weaponry as soon as it appears. Without doubt, the practical application of transhumanism would produce devastating weapons of war. Imagine facing a nation that could field entire battalions of Captain Americas!

Because of the possibility of transhumans bringing mass destruction to our own race, Savulescu would like to accompany our physical enhancements with an improved system of morality via genetic engineering and hormone therapy in order to make us more cooperative and altruistic. In other words, we would all become designer babies.

The problem, of course, is the question of who decides what is moral. Under a transhumanist regime, the true Christian vision would be entirely shut out because it would refuse to cooperate, knowing that being artificially reconstructed physically, mentally and morally is certainly not Gods will for our lives. So the elite, despite their dismal record, would be left to make the decisions. Savulescu argues that, since we already allow embryo selection and selective abortions to eliminate diseased embryos and fetuses, there should be no objection to using these methods to choose other genetic traits.1

This shows that the Christian vision is already being ignored during the long march to the Singularity.

The third point of the Transhumanist Declaration states, We recognize that humanity faces serious risks, especially from the misuse of new technologies. There are possible realistic scenarios that lead to the loss of most, or even all, of what we hold valuable. For Christians, a world without our Savior would be the ultimate nightmare.

Nobody not even transhumanists denies that the Humanity+ movement will lead to even greater disparities between rich and poor. Just look at our record regarding inequality between the developed and developing nations.

The average life span of Americans has improved from 48 years in 1900 to 79 years now.2 The great majority of this is due to the availability of clean drinking water and better health care. However, more than one-fourth of Africans do not even have clean drinking water.3 Even multi-billionaires like Bill Gates recognize this disparity; he said, It seems pretty egocentric while we still have malaria and TB [tuberculosis] for rich people to fund things so they can live longer.

Members of the unthinking elite always lead the charge into morally questionable activities. If it makes them feel progressive and good about themselves, they are all for it!

The world has always been populated with Utopians, those who desire a perfect world. This concept has taken many forms, from massive social movements such as Communism, Socialism and Nazism to tiny communes in Oregon.

The grander visions are invariably doomed to fail because, in order to get to the final point, there must be an intermediate stage where a strictly authoritarian regime takes over and reorganizes society in order to realize the Utopia. The most common of such systems, Communism, would be a perfect system for humanity if not for our pesky imperfect human nature and the worship we owe to our Creator. And so, after the authoritarians take over, they get comfortable on top of the heap and simply cannot let go of control. So millions die while millions more live in abject misery.

The process of establishing an ideal society must always include the coercion and the exclusion of those who refuse to go along. Anyone who thinks that life-enhancing and life-extending technology (which will inevitably be hugely expensive) will not also lead to a have-have not society is criminally nave. And those who think that transhumanism will not lead to unheard-of atrocities are equally oblivious. As already mentioned, Culture of Death movements cannot admit defeat; they simply claim that their ideas werent taken far enough, and are always eager to try again.As historian Elof Carlson writes, Eugenics failed because it was not scientific enough.The role of eugenics in our time is in maximizing [hereditary] information and its availability to those who need it and minimizing the temptation to use the State as the means of enforcing eugenic ideals.4

Eugenicists always accompany their bland assurances with such empty promises.

Liberals claim to be outraged by the great gulf between the resources allotted to the poor and to the rich. Well, with transhumanism, we can say they aint seen nothin yet!

We have always had eugenics with us, from societies that simply discarded sick newborns outside the city gates to the social engineers in a dozen European nations who deemed who is worthy of life and who is not. If the transhumanist idea of self-evolution sounds familiar, it should; it is the latest and most virulent expression of the movement that spawned Germanys Holocaust.

Of most concern to pro-lifers is that transhumanism will have a profound impact upon human procreation if it becomes the dominant philosophy. The most influential transhumanist thinkers believe that all babies should be conceived via artificial means using the gametes of licensed parents, then thoroughly screened in order to eliminate all defects, and grown in synthetic wombs to ensure that only the fittest humans are produced. As one transhumanist writer has said, When responsible child rearing is more highly valued than biological parenthood, we will be procreating as transhumans.

This is not a new idea. In 1992, Time Magazine speculated:

It is reasonable to ask whether there will be a family at all. Given the propensity for divorce, the growing number of adults who choose to remain single, the declining popularity of having children and the evaporation of the time families spend together, another way may eventually evolve. It may be quicker and more efficient to dispense with family-based reproduction. Society could then produce its future generations in institutions that might resemble state-sponsored baby hatcheries.5

We have already embarked upon what will become the latest corpse-strewn march to perfection; more than 90% of all Downs syndrome children detected before birth are aborted in most Western nations, and Iceland now publicly brags that it has entirely eliminated them. In a transhumanist system, perfection is the primary survival trait. And, if the history of earlier eugenics movements is any indication, so will be the color of ones skin.

Interestingly, the 1997 movie Gattaca shows us what a transhumanist society would look like. It depicts a society sharply divided into two categories of people the Valids, who have been conceived with IVF and have been thoroughly screened, and the Invalids, conceived naturally. The Valids have their choice of occupations, and whatever is left over is assigned to the Invalids.

Already, some of the elite are (perhaps) unconsciously imitating the film. One of these is Julian Savulescu, who promotes what he calls procreative beneficence. He claims that it would be better for society if we allow only genetically superior children to be born: If we have the power to intervene in the nature of our offspring rather than consigning them to the natural lottery then we should. His general plan, which is eerily reminiscent of the Nazis Lebensborn eugenics program, is to enlist the genetically superior to create millions of embryos via in-vitro fertilization, apply rigorous preimplantation genetic diagnosis to all of them, and then implant only the best. He does not give us many details on what kind of people he considers superior, but, based upon descriptions provided by many previous eugenicists, we can make an educated guess.

In short, in the minds of influential transhumanist thinkers, a transhumanist society would be a society of test-tube babies, created apart from the natural environment of human conception.

The first casualty of such Utopian visions is common sense, brought on by an utter ignorance of human nature. The second thing to be tossed aside is personal choice. It is human nature to want to keep up with others. Once some people begin to augment themselves, others will feel compelled to do the same, by removing and replacing perfectly good eyes, ears and limbs just to keep up at their jobs and in their social circles. At this point, transhumanism will make man a slave to the technology he craves. And the wise know that there is no happiness or contentment in slavery, whether it be to drugs, sex, fashion, money, power or the latest style of artificial arm.

These grand projects may seem ludicrous, but we should remember that revolutions always begin with just a handful of people talking about them people like Margaret Sanger, Jack Kevorkian, Larry Lader and Bernard Nathanson (before he reformed).

And their revolutions always end in death.

[1] Richard Weikart. Can We Make Ourselves More Moral? Designer Babies, Hormone Therapy, and the New Eugenics of Transhumanism. Lifeissues.net, June 6, 2016.

[2] United States Census Bureau. Statistical Abstract of the United States(Washington, D.C., 2012 Edition), Table 104, Expectation of Life at Birth, 1970 to 2008, and Projections, 2010 to 2020.

[3] The 2016 Edition of the CIA World Factbook.

[4] Jan Witkowski and John Inglis, editors. Davenports Dream: 21st Century Reflections on Heredity and Eugenics. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2008.[6] Kyle Munkittrick. When Will We Be Transhuman? Seven Conditions for Attaining Transhumanism. Discover, July 16, 2011.

[5] Time Magazine Fall 1992 Special Issue titled Beyond the Year 2000: What to Expect in the New Millennium.

Continue reading here:
4 Problems with Transhumanism - Human Life International

Posted in Transhumanist | Comments Off on 4 Problems with Transhumanism – Human Life International

MoonLake Immunotherapeutics completes patient enrollment and randomization ahead of schedule in a Phase 2 trial of the Nanobody sonelokimab in…

Posted: at 11:18 pm

MoonLake Immunotherapeutics completes patient enrollment and randomization ahead of schedule in a Phase 2 trial of the Nanobody sonelokimab in moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa  Marketscreener.com

Read the rest here:
MoonLake Immunotherapeutics completes patient enrollment and randomization ahead of schedule in a Phase 2 trial of the Nanobody sonelokimab in...

Posted in Psoriasis | Comments Off on MoonLake Immunotherapeutics completes patient enrollment and randomization ahead of schedule in a Phase 2 trial of the Nanobody sonelokimab in…

EVELO BIOSCIENCES, INC. : Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Other Events (form 8-K) -…

Posted: at 11:17 pm

EVELO BIOSCIENCES, INC. : Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Other Events (form 8-K)  Marketscreener.com

View post:
EVELO BIOSCIENCES, INC. : Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Other Events (form 8-K) -...

Posted in Psoriasis | Comments Off on EVELO BIOSCIENCES, INC. : Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Other Events (form 8-K) -…

Science and History of GMOs and Other Food Modification Processes

Posted: at 11:10 pm

Feed Your Mind Main Page

en Espaol (Spanish)

Genetic engineering is often used in combination with traditional breeding to produce the genetically engineered plant varieties on the market today.

For thousands of years, humans have been using traditional modification methods like selective breeding and cross-breeding to breed plants and animals with more desirable traits. For example, early farmers developed cross-breeding methods to grow corn with a range of colors, sizes, and uses. Todays strawberries are a cross between a strawberry species native to North America and a strawberry species native to South America.

Most of the foods we eat today were created through traditional breeding methods. But changing plants and animals through traditional breeding can take a long time, and it is difficult to make very specific changes. After scientists developed genetic engineering in the 1970s, they were able to make similar changes in a more specific way and in a shorter amount of time.

A Timeline of Genetic Modification in Modern Agriculture

PDF: 152KB

Circa 8000 BCE: Humans use traditional modification methods like selective breeding and cross-breeding to breed plants and animals with more desirable traits.

1866: Gregor Mendel, an Austrian monk, breeds two different types of peas and identifies the basic process of genetics.

1922: The first hybrid corn is produced and sold commercially.

1940: Plant breeders learn to use radiation or chemicals to randomly change an organisms DNA.

1953: Building on the discoveries of chemist Rosalind Franklin, scientists James Watson and Francis Crick identify the structure of DNA.

1973: Biochemists Herbert Boyer and Stanley Cohen develop genetic engineering by inserting DNA from one bacteria into another.

1982: FDA approves the first consumer GMO product developed through genetic engineering: human insulin to treat diabetes.

1986: The federal government establishes the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology. This policy describes how the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) work together to regulate the safety of GMOs.

1992: FDA policy states that foods from GMO plants must meet the same requirements, including the same safety standards, as foods derived from traditionally bred plants.

1994: The first GMO produce created through genetic engineeringa GMO tomatobecomes available for sale after studies evaluated by federal agencies proved it to be as safe as traditionally bred tomatoes.

1990s: The first wave of GMO produce created through genetic engineering becomes available to consumers: summer squash, soybeans, cotton, corn, papayas, tomatoes, potatoes, and canola. Not all are still available for sale.

2003: The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations develop international guidelines and standards to determine the safety of GMO foods.

2005: GMO alfalfa and sugar beets are available for sale in the United States.

2015: FDA approves an application for the first genetic modification in an animal for use as food, a genetically engineered salmon.

2016: Congress passes a law requiring labeling for some foods produced through genetic engineering and uses the term bioengineered, which will start to appear on some foods.

2017: GMO apples are available for sale in the U.S.

2019: FDA completes consultation on first food from a genome edited plant.

2020: GMO pink pineapple is available to U.S. consumers.

2020: Application for GalSafe pig was approved.

GMO (genetically modified organism) has become the common term consumers and popular media use to describe foods that have been created through genetic engineering. Genetic engineering is a process that involves:

How Are GMOs Made? Fact Sheet

The following example gives a general idea of the steps it takes to create a GMO plant. This example uses a type of insect-resistant corn called Bt corn. Keep in mind that the processes for creating a GMO plant, animal, or microorganism may be different.

To produce a GMO plant, scientists first identify what trait they want that plant to have, such as resistance to drought, herbicides, or insects. Then, they find an organism (plant, animal, or microorganism) that already has that trait within its genes. In this example, scientists wanted to create insect-resistant corn to reduce the need to spray pesticides. They identified a gene in a soil bacterium called Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), which produces a natural insecticide that has been in use for many years in traditional and organic agriculture.

After scientists find the gene with the desired trait, they copy that gene.

For Bt corn, they copied the gene in Bt that would provide the insect-resistance trait.

Next, scientists use tools to insert the gene into the DNA of the plant. By inserting the Bt gene into the DNA of the corn plant, scientists gave it the insect resistance trait.

This new trait does not change the other existing traits.

In the laboratory, scientists grow the new corn plant to ensure it has adopted the desired trait (insect resistance). If successful, scientists first grow and monitor the new corn plant (now called Bt corn because it contains a gene from Bacillus thuringiensis) in greenhouses and then in small field tests before moving it into larger field tests. GMO plants go through in-depth review and tests before they are ready to be sold to farmers.

The entire process of bringing a GMO plant to the marketplace takes several years.

Learn more about the process for creating genetically engineered microbes and genetically engineered animals.

Scientists are developing new ways to create new varieties of crops and animals using a process called genome editing. These techniques can make changes more quickly and precisely than traditional breeding methods.

There are several genome editing tools, such as CRISPR. Scientists can use these newer genome editing tools to make crops more nutritious, drought tolerant, and resistant to insect pests and diseases.

How GMOs Are Regulated in the United States

GMO Crops, Animal Food, and Beyond

How GMO Crops Impact Our World

See more here:
Science and History of GMOs and Other Food Modification Processes

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on Science and History of GMOs and Other Food Modification Processes

Teachers Rejoice! OpenAI Released Tool to Catch ChatGPT Writing

Posted: January 31, 2023 at 5:39 pm

Thanks for signing up!

Access your favorite topics in a personalized feed while you're on the go. download the app

OpenAI has heard everyone's concerns, and it's finally working on detecting AI-generated writing.

Since its launch, the company's explosive AI chatbot, ChatGPT, has caused shockwaves in many industries due to its skilled writingand coding abilities. The bot has already accomplished several impressive feats, including passing the US Medical Licensing Exam, a Wharton MBA exam, and 4 law school courses.

However, ChatGPT has also caused handwringingamong teachers and other education professionals who say the bot will help students get better at cheating and plagiarism.

On Tuesday, the company launched a web-based program called "AI Text Classifier" to tackle that issue.

The program will flag pasted-in text with the following labels: "very unlikely," "unlikely," "unclear if it is," "possibly," or "likely" AI-generated.

OpenAI admits its tool isn't quite perfect yet: It requires a minimum of 1,000 characters to determine whether text is AI-generated and is prone to making errors.

"These tools will produce both false negatives, where they don't identify AI-generated content as such, and false positives, where they flag human-written content as AI-generated. Additionally, students may quickly learn how to evade detection by modifying some words or clauses in generated content," the company said in a blog post.

OpenAI did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment.

OpenAI isn't the first to attempt an antidote to the AI-writing conundrum. Plagiarism detector Turnitin told Insider they are working on a similar product to detect AI-generated text from ChatGPT, which a Turnitin executive called a "mad-lib machine."

A 22-year-old college student at Princeton University also released a program to detect AI writing earlier this month called GPTZero.

Read the rest here:
Teachers Rejoice! OpenAI Released Tool to Catch ChatGPT Writing

Posted in Moon Colonization | Comments Off on Teachers Rejoice! OpenAI Released Tool to Catch ChatGPT Writing

Are You Smarter Than ChatGPT? OpenAI Tool Aims to Detect AI-Generated …

Posted: at 5:39 pm

To stop ChatGPT abuse, OpenAI has a new tool that can tell you whether a piece of text is more likely to have come from an AI program or a human.

OpenAI introduced the classifier tool(Opens in a new window) on Tuesday to help crack down on AI-generated text thats being passed off as coming from a human. The problem has become especially pronounced in education with students exploiting ChatGPT to complete homework assignments.

In a blog post(Opens in a new window), OpenAI also noted that AI-generated text could pose a threat when used to generate automated text for misinformation campaigns.

The classifier tool is pretty straightforward: Submit some text at least 1,000 characters in length, and OpenAI will tell you the likelihood that it came from an AI program or a human. The tool was created by training a computer model to discern between pairs of human-written text and AI-written text on the same topic.

(Credit: OpenAI)

However, the San Francisco lab admits the classifier is far from perfect. In our evaluations on a challenge set of English texts, our classifier correctly identifies 26% of AI-written text (true positives) as likely AI-written, while incorrectly labeling human-written text as AI-written 9% of the time (false positives), OpenAI wrote.

The classifiers reliability also drops when examining short snippets or a few paragraphs of text. So the tool will only work on submissions at over 1,000 characters in length. In addition, sometimes human-written text will be incorrectly but confidently labeled as AI-written by our classifier, OpenAI noted.

Additionally, students may quickly learn how to evade detection by modifying some words or clauses in generated content, the lab said.

Hence, OpenAI says the tool should not be used as a primary decision-making tool when it comes to determining whether a piece of text is AI-generated or not. But despite all the limitations, OpenAI decided to release the tool as it works on mitigations to prevent students from exploiting ChatGPT for cheating purposes.

Were making this classifier publicly available to get feedback(Opens in a new window) on whether imperfect tools like this one are useful, OpenAI added. Our work on the detection of AI-generated text will continue, and we hope to share improved methods in the future.

An example of an essay ChatGPT can write.(Credit: Open AI)

Launched in November, ChatGPT is so advanced that the AI program can write essays, poems, and answer test questions on a wide variety of topics within seconds. While the quality of the responses can be shaky, researchers have found that ChatGPT is smart enough to (barely) pass an MBA exam and even fix numerous bugs in computer code.

Inevitably, the emergence of ChatGPT has sparked questions over whether the same program threatens to undermine education and disrupt white-collar jobs. Already, some schools and teachers have decided to block the AI program on their networks over concerns that ChatGPT makes cheating on homework and tests all too easy. Meanwhile, some third parties have released their own free(Opens in a new window) tools(Opens in a new window) to help educators ferret out AI-generated text.

OpenAI said its trying to address the cheating problems by reaching out to teachers in the US to learn about their experiences.The lab has also published a document(Opens in a new window) with advice on how educators could introduce and oversee ChatGPT use in their classrooms safely.

But OpenAI also noted its still too early to say how programs like ChatGPT will affect education and society. To date we have seen instances of productivity improvements that transform jobs, job displacement, and job creation, but both the near and long term net effects are unclear, it said.

Sign up for What's New Now to get our top stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time.

More here:
Are You Smarter Than ChatGPT? OpenAI Tool Aims to Detect AI-Generated ...

Posted in Moon Colonization | Comments Off on Are You Smarter Than ChatGPT? OpenAI Tool Aims to Detect AI-Generated …

What is Artificial Intelligence (AI) ? | IBM

Posted: at 5:39 pm

While a number of definitions of artificial intelligence (AI) have surfaced over the last few decades, John McCarthy offers the following definition in this 2004paper(PDF, 106 KB) (link resides outside IBM), " It is the science and engineering of making intelligent machines, especially intelligent computer programs. It is related to the similar task of using computers to understand human intelligence, but AI does not have to confine itself to methods that are biologically observable."

However, decades before this definition, the birth of the artificial intelligence conversation was denoted by Alan Turing's seminal work, "Computing Machinery and Intelligence" (PDF, 89.8 KB) (link resides outside of IBM), which was published in 1950. In this paper, Turing, often referred to as the "father of computer science", asks the following question, "Can machines think?" From there, he offers a test, now famously known as the "Turing Test", where a human interrogator would try to distinguish between a computer and human text response. While this test has undergone much scrutiny since its publish, it remains an important part of the history of AI as well as an ongoing concept within philosophy as it utilizes ideas around linguistics.

Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig then proceeded to publish,Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach(link resides outside IBM), becoming one of the leading textbooks in the study of AI. In it, they delve into four potential goals or definitions of AI, which differentiates computer systems on the basis of rationality and thinking vs. acting:

Human approach:

Ideal approach:

Alan Turings definition would have fallen under the category of systems that act like humans.

At its simplest form, artificial intelligence is a field, which combines computer science and robust datasets, to enable problem-solving. It also encompasses sub-fields of machine learning and deep learning, which are frequently mentioned in conjunction with artificial intelligence. These disciplines are comprised of AI algorithms which seek to create expert systems which make predictions or classifications based on input data.

Today, a lot of hype still surrounds AI development, which is expected of any new emerging technology in the market. As noted inGartners hype cycle(link resides outside IBM), product innovations like, self-driving cars and personal assistants, follow a typical progression of innovation, from overenthusiasm through a period of disillusionment to an eventual understanding of the innovations relevance and role in a market or domain. As Lex Fridman noteshere(01:08:05) (link resides outside IBM) in his MIT lecture in 2019, we are at the peak of inflated expectations, approaching the trough of disillusionment.

As conversations emerge around the ethics of AI, we can begin to see the initial glimpses of the trough of disillusionment. To read more on where IBM stands within the conversation aroundAI ethics, read morehere.

See the rest here:
What is Artificial Intelligence (AI) ? | IBM

Posted in Moon Colonization | Comments Off on What is Artificial Intelligence (AI) ? | IBM

Genetics | History, Biology, Timeline, & Facts | Britannica

Posted: at 5:32 pm

Top Questions

What is genetics?

Genetics is the study ofheredityin general and ofgenesin particular. Genetics forms one of the central pillars ofbiologyand overlaps with many other areas, such as agriculture,medicine, andbiotechnology.

Is intelligence genetic?

Intelligenceis a very complex human trait, the genetics of which has been a subject of controversy for some time. Even roughly measured via diverse cognitive tests, intelligence shows a strong contribution from the environment.

How is genetic testing done?

Genetic testing typically is issued only after a medical history, a physical examination, and the construction of a family pedigree documenting familialgenetic diseaseshave been considered. The genetic tests themselves are carried out using chemical, radiological, histopathologic, and electrodiagnostic procedures. Genetic testing may involve cytogenetic analyses to investigate chromosomes, molecular assays to investigate genes and DNA, or biochemical assays to investigateenzymes,hormones, oramino acids.

Summary

genetics, study of heredity in general and of genes in particular. Genetics forms one of the central pillars of biology and overlaps with many other areas, such as agriculture, medicine, and biotechnology.

Since the dawn of civilization, humankind has recognized the influence of heredity and applied its principles to the improvement of cultivated crops and domestic animals. A Babylonian tablet more than 6,000 years old, for example, shows pedigrees of horses and indicates possible inherited characteristics. Other old carvings show cross-pollination of date palm trees. Most of the mechanisms of heredity, however, remained a mystery until the 19th century, when genetics as a systematic science began.

Genetics arose out of the identification of genes, the fundamental units responsible for heredity. Genetics may be defined as the study of genes at all levels, including the ways in which they act in the cell and the ways in which they are transmitted from parents to offspring. Modern genetics focuses on the chemical substance that genes are made of, called deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, and the ways in which it affects the chemical reactions that constitute the living processes within the cell. Gene action depends on interaction with the environment. Green plants, for example, have genes containing the information necessary to synthesize the photosynthetic pigment chlorophyll that gives them their green colour. Chlorophyll is synthesized in an environment containing light because the gene for chlorophyll is expressed only when it interacts with light. If a plant is placed in a dark environment, chlorophyll synthesis stops because the gene is no longer expressed.

Genetics as a scientific discipline stemmed from the work of Gregor Mendel in the middle of the 19th century. Mendel suspected that traits were inherited as discrete units, and, although he knew nothing of the physical or chemical nature of genes at the time, his units became the basis for the development of the present understanding of heredity. All present research in genetics can be traced back to Mendels discovery of the laws governing the inheritance of traits. The word genetics was introduced in 1905 by English biologist William Bateson, who was one of the discoverers of Mendels work and who became a champion of Mendels principles of inheritance.

Although scientific evidence for patterns of genetic inheritance did not appear until Mendels work, history shows that humankind must have been interested in heredity long before the dawn of civilization. Curiosity must first have been based on human family resemblances, such as similarity in body structure, voice, gait, and gestures. Such notions were instrumental in the establishment of family and royal dynasties. Early nomadic tribes were interested in the qualities of the animals that they herded and domesticated and, undoubtedly, bred selectively. The first human settlements that practiced farming appear to have selected crop plants with favourable qualities. Ancient tomb paintings show racehorse breeding pedigrees containing clear depictions of the inheritance of several distinct physical traits in the horses. Despite this interest, the first recorded speculations on heredity did not exist until the time of the ancient Greeks; some aspects of their ideas are still considered relevant today.

Hippocrates (c. 460c. 375 bce), known as the father of medicine, believed in the inheritance of acquired characteristics, and, to account for this, he devised the hypothesis known as pangenesis. He postulated that all organs of the body of a parent gave off invisible seeds, which were like miniaturized building components and were transmitted during sexual intercourse, reassembling themselves in the mothers womb to form a baby.

Aristotle (384322 bce) emphasized the importance of blood in heredity. He thought that the blood supplied generative material for building all parts of the adult body, and he reasoned that blood was the basis for passing on this generative power to the next generation. In fact, he believed that the males semen was purified blood and that a womans menstrual blood was her equivalent of semen. These male and female contributions united in the womb to produce a baby. The blood contained some type of hereditary essences, but he believed that the baby would develop under the influence of these essences, rather than being built from the essences themselves.

Aristotles ideas about the role of blood in procreation were probably the origin of the still prevalent notion that somehow the blood is involved in heredity. Today people still speak of certain traits as being in the blood and of blood lines and blood ties. The Greek model of inheritance, in which a teeming multitude of substances was invoked, differed from that of the Mendelian model. Mendels idea was that distinct differences between individuals are determined by differences in single yet powerful hereditary factors. These single hereditary factors were identified as genes. Copies of genes are transmitted through sperm and egg and guide the development of the offspring. Genes are also responsible for reproducing the distinct features of both parents that are visible in their children.

In the two millennia between the lives of Aristotle and Mendel, few new ideas were recorded on the nature of heredity. In the 17th and 18th centuries the idea of preformation was introduced. Scientists using the newly developed microscopes imagined that they could see miniature replicas of human beings inside sperm heads. French biologist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck invoked the idea of the inheritance of acquired characters, not as an explanation for heredity but as a model for evolution. He lived at a time when the fixity of species was taken for granted, yet he maintained that this fixity was only found in a constant environment. He enunciated the law of use and disuse, which states that when certain organs become specially developed as a result of some environmental need, then that state of development is hereditary and can be passed on to progeny. He believed that in this way, over many generations, giraffes could arise from deerlike animals that had to keep stretching their necks to reach high leaves on trees.

British naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace originally postulated the theory of evolution by natural selection. However, Charles Darwins observations during his circumnavigation of the globe aboard the HMS Beagle (183136) provided evidence for natural selection and his suggestion that humans and animals shared a common ancestry. Many scientists at the time believed in a hereditary mechanism that was a version of the ancient Greek idea of pangenesis, and Darwins ideas did not appear to fit with the theory of heredity that sprang from the experiments of Mendel.

Read more here:
Genetics | History, Biology, Timeline, & Facts | Britannica

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on Genetics | History, Biology, Timeline, & Facts | Britannica

Page 101«..1020..100101102103..110120..»