Category Archives: Censorship

2021: The year in censored terms on the Chinese internet SupChina Skip to the content

Search for any China-based companySearch for any China-based companyHuatai Insurance GroupTSMCHuaqinXuanji TechChina Life InsuranceBilibiliVolitationHuimingjieHuaweiAgricultural Bank of ChinaAEEEHangChina Three Gorges Corporation (CTG)Aviation Industry Corporation of ChinaCATLYuanfudaoChina Academy of Aerospace AerodynamicsTsinghua UnigroupGreat Wall MotorsFantasia HoldingsXiaomi58.comBrilliance Auto GroupLenovoAir DwingAutel RoboticsWaterdropHoneycombSoarabilityShenhua EnergyFAW GroupBaiduJinko SolarHigh GreatByteDanceSinochemChina Railway Construction CorporationXAGKanzhunGeely AutoZTEDAMODAManner CoffeeXPeng MotorsMissFreshiQiyiMideaJD TechnologyGenki ForestT3 TravelChina Development BankKuaishouSMDChangan AutomobileChina Railway Group (CREC)China Construction BankPAX TechnologySJAIChina State Construction EngineeringGAC GroupChicecreamTALDJIRoborockNIOIceKreditGrepowSuning.comChina National Petroleum CorporationPinduoduoGDUGaotu TecheduFOiA DroneBrilliance ChinaXNWCITIC GroupChina PostINNNOLi AutoChina ResourcesGanfeng LithiumPing An InsuranceAutoFlightJD HealthState Grid (SGCC)Evergrande GroupChina UnicomneoMeituanLens TechnologyHuobiManbang GroupBank of ChinaAnt GroupZuoyebangZhangmenSinopharm GroupYuanmu HoldingGeneinnoSinopecShenghe Resources HoldingBinanceYatsen Holding LimitedSuning FinanceChina OceanwideHaierChina Northern Rare Earth GroupDongfengBaotou SteelModern LandBitalltechCodemaoQihoo 360 Technology Inc.TencentCMC Inc.China International Capital CorporationBYDLi NingDidi ChuxingJincheng AviationAnta SportsLizhi Inc.Dingdong MaicaiWeiboSheinXing Yuan DongAerofugiaSAICWalkeraNew OrientalZingtoSky SYSMMCGreeJOYYUBTECH RoboticsOPPOPony.aiGEMLuckin CoffeeBank of CommunicationsSinovac BiotechChina MobileChina National Offshore Oil CorporationAlibabaYuanxin TechnologyChina Pacific Construction Group (CPCG)MegviiBAIC BJEVJD LogisticsKweichow MoutaiJD.comSinic HoldingsIndustrial and Commercial Bank of ChinaInceptio TechnologyTIMAgricultureArts, Entertainment, and MediaAutomotiveConsumer ElectronicsConsumer SoftwareDefense and SecurityEcommerceEducationEnergy and UtilitiesEnterprise SoftwareFashion and BeautyFinancial ServicesFood and BeverageHealthcareIndustrials and ManufacturingInformation TechnologyInfrastructure and ConstructionInsuranceMarketing and AdvertisingMaterials and ChemicalsNon-Consumer ElectronicsReal EstateRetailSemiconductorsTelecommunicationsTransportation and Logistics

Continued here:
2021: The year in censored terms on the Chinese internet - SupChina

From empty stadiums during an Olympics to a 10-wicket haul in a Test, from a mid-game cardiac arrest to an emotional crowd tracking the developments of one of the greatest players of football changing his allegiance, sport saw it all.

A javelin throw made an entire country roar. Mental health took a front row seat as "oohs" and "aahs" greeted the 'unheard-of' decisions.Racism was tackled in a way never known before. Stars disappeared and reappeared quite conveniently as the worldwent down a warpath against human rights abuse, censorship and staying mum. 10 wickets were grabbed by a single man in a Test while 'pedal-to-the-metal' anda last-lap controversy decided the fate of the new "Race God" 2021, with a pandemic raging on the side, was quite a roller coaster ride!

We'll get right to it, shall we? The sporting highlights of the year in snippets, glimpses and adrenaline!

Neeraj Chopra clinches Olympic gold, ends India's wait

Neeraj Chopra celebrates after winning the gold medal in the men's javelin throw final at the Olympics in Tokyo. AP

Neeraj Choprafought his way into the spotlight with a throw of 87.58m and immortalised himself as the first track-and-field Olympic Games medal-winner for India.

His was the country's seventh medal and the only gold in this Olympics and he joined shooter Abhinav Bindra (2008 Beijing Games) in an elite and very hard-to-reach club of India's individual gold winners in the showpiece.

Chopra shatteredthe glass ceiling to become the country's first gold-medallist in 13 years.He became the youngest Indian to win an Olympic gold and the only one to do it in his debut Games.

"Dare ye speak of mental health"

File image of Simone Biles. AP

It was the year that mental health took a prominent position in the sports world led by two female athletes: Simone Biles and Naomi Osaka.

Biles, the American gymnastics superstar, earned her seventh Olympic medal and second in Tokyo with a third-place finish in the balance beam final on Aug. 3. That was a week after she took herself out of several competitions to deal with a dreaded mental block that gymnasts call the twisties, which prevents an athlete from performing high-level moves safely.

This was two months after Osaka pulled out of the French Open before the second round to take a mental health break after having announced she would not participate in news conferences in Paris. She also sat out Wimbledon before participating in the Tokyo Olympics.

Together, their sagas led the way to a new, more in-depth conversation about emotional health and athletes.

'Streets still smokin'

Max Verstappen narrowly beat Lewis Hamilton in the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix to deny the Mercedes driver a record eighth world title. AP

An emotional Max Verstappen described his journey to being crowned 2021 Formula One world champion as "insane" after he beat rival Lewis Hamilton in a last lap sprint for victory at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix on 12 December. Verstappen thus snatched from Hamilton the chance to be crowned champion a recordeight times.

The intervention of a safety car four laps from the end, some would say, was the deciding factor.

It was a fitting end to a season that saw the two contenders go wheel-to-wheel in over 22 races, spanning four continents. It marked the first time the contenders were equal at the season finale since 1974.

On the same day,Mercedes lodged two appealsagainst Verstappen's win over Hamilton. However, four days later, Mercedes withdrew the appeal saying they had made the decision following "constructive dialogue" with governing body FIA.

The curious case of Peng Shuai

Peng Shuai alleged that a powerful Chinese politician sexually assaulted her. AP

Peng Shuai is at the centre of growing concern after the tennis star alleged in November that a powerful Chinese politician sexually assaulted her. The 35-year-old Peng, a former world number one in doubles, went missing since only to reappear quite out-of-the-blue at a sporting event and a restaurant where she declared that she was absolutely fine.

Many questioned the sudden twist in the tale, including sportspersons and celebrities who had raised a hue and cry over her disappearance, which many think prompted the Chinese government to take necessary action to thwart global outcry and suspicion.

It was the first time that the #MeToo movement has struck at the top echelons of Chinas ruling Communist Party.

An 'Aussie, Aussie, Aussie!' T20 World Cup

Australia won their first cricket T20 World Cup with an eight-wicket victory over New Zealand in the final on 14 November.

Australia have not lost to New Zealand in a knockout game over the last 40 years.

David Warner's impressive comeback from being dropped by Sunrisers Hyderabad in the preceding IPL season to receiving the'Player of the Tournament' medallion in the T20 World Cup, was a true story of redemption.

Ajaz Patel's impressive 10-fer

Image of Ajaz Patel. AP

New Zealand's left-arm spinner Ajaz Patel became only the third bowler to take all 10 wickets in an innings as India folded for 325 during the second session on day two of the second Test against New Zealand in Mumbai on 3 December during the India vs New Zealand series.

The Mumbai-born 34-year-old Ajaz, joined an elite list comprising just Jim Laker (1956) and Anil Kumble (1999) in scalping 10-wicket hauls in a Test innings.With all 10 wickets in his kitty, Patel also surpassed the great Richard Hadlee to record the best figures by a New Zealand bowler. Hadlee had taken nine for 52 versus Australia back in 1985.

"Honestly, it's surreal and to be able to do that in my career is pretty special. The stars have aligned for me to do it in Mumbai," Patel said after his feat.

Mumbai Cricket Association (MCA) president Vijay Patil lauded New Zealand spinner Ajaz Patel for donating his "10-wicket" ball for the upcoming MCA museum where it would duly be the "pride of the place".

Yorkshire racism row

A video grab from footage broadcast by the UK Parliament's Parliamentary Recording Unit shows former Yorkshire cricketer Azeem Rafiq testifying in front of a Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee in London on 16 November as MPs probe racial harassment at the club. AFP

AzimRafiq grabbed the spotlight this year when his allegations of racism against the Yorkshire Cricket County Club wherein he told British lawmakers, part of the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) committee, this November, that he "lost his career" to racism.

An independent report found the Pakistan-born player was a victim of "racial harassment and bullying" while Rafiq himself said he had been driven to thoughts of suicide over the way he was treated.

Rafiqaccused Former England captain Michael Vaughan of being a perpetrator in this racism row.England spinner Adil Rashid joined ex-Pakistan Test player Rana Naved-ul-Hasan in alleging that Vaughan had said in front of a group of Yorkshire players of Asian ethnicity in 2009: "Too many of you lot, we need to do something about it."

Novak Djokovic

File image of 20-time Grand Slam champion Novak Djokovic. AP

Novak Djokovic, during the Tokyo Olympics,lost his cool and abused his racket several times during a 6-4, 6-7 (6), 6-3 defeat to Pablo Carreno Busta of Spain in the bronze-medal match of the tennis tournament.

Djokovic received a verbal warning for the net-post incident, but Carreno Busta appeared to question the chair umpire as to why it wasnt a point penalty since it was the second instance of racket abuse. The umpire, however, hadn't warned Djokovic for the first incident

Messi signswith PSG, bids adieu to Barcelona after 21 years

Lionel Messi broke down at his press conference to announce he was leaving FC Barcelona. AP

Lionel Messi fought back tears during a press conference in August at which he confirmed he is leaving Barcelona, where he has played his entire career.

Lionel Messi broke down even before he spoke. There was a round of applause as he stood on the stage, bawling his eyes out. And then the bombshell dropped: "After 21 years I'm leaving with my three Catalan-Argentine kids. We've lived in this city, this is our home. I'm just really grateful for everything, all my teammates, everyone who has been by my side."

After 21 years, 17 seasons with the first time, 778 appearances, 672 goals, 10 league titles, six Ballons d'Or, four Champions League trophies, it's all over for Messi andhis maiden club.

Olympics in a pandemic

A man, wearing a protective face mask, sits inside an empty Ariake Arena, just before the start of a women's volleyball preliminary round pool A match between Japan and South Korea, at the 2020 Summer Olympics, Saturday, July 31, 2021, in Tokyo, Japan. AP

Any sporting event is, at its heart, a show. It has the actors on center stage, performing for the rest of us. It has the spectators, sitting in their seats watching raptly. And in modern times, at least it has the home audience, which in the past half century of growing video viewership has far outpaced the numbers of those actually in attendance.

When it comes to fan interaction, sports, arguably, have been affected the most of all.

When TV cameras panned various Olympic venues and found emptiness, or even seats painted in seemingly random drab colors to look as if there are people in them, it was clear something that certain something that only a crowd can provide was glaringly absent.

Christian Eriksen

Christian Eriksen being carried away by paramedics on a stretcher after the footballer collapsed during a Euro 2020 match. AP Photo

AEuropean Championship game betweenDenmark and Finland was suspendedin June after Inter Milan midfielder Christian Eriksensuffered a cardiac arrest on field.Denmark's team doctor later said that Eriksen's heart stopped and that he was gone before being resuscitated with a defibrillator on ground.

Eriksenterminated his contract with Inter Milan by mutual consent six months later, this December.

(with inputs from agencies)

Read all theLatest News,Trending News,Cricket News,Bollywood News,India NewsandEntertainment Newshere. Follow us onFacebook,TwitterandInstagram

Read the original:
Year in review 2021, Biggest Sports Stories: Of glory, mental health, censorship and tears - Firstpost

Nils Melzer, the UNspecial rapporteur on torture, is one of the very few establishment figuresto denouncethe judicial lynching of Julian Assange. Melzer's integrity and courage, for which he has been mercilessly attacked, stand in stark contrast to the widespread complicity of many human rights and press organizations, including PEN America, which has become a de facto subsidiary of the Democratic National Committee.

Those in power, as Noam Chomsky points out, divide the world into "worthy" and "unworthy" victims. They weep crocodile tears over the plight of Uyghur Muslims persecuted in China while demonizing and slaughtering Muslims in the Middle East. They decry press censorship in hostile states and collude with the press censorship and algorithms emanating from Silicon Valley in the United States. It is an old and insidious game, one practiced not to promote human rights or press freedom but to envelop these courtiers to power in a sanctimonious and cloying self-righteousness. PEN America can't say the words "Belarus," "Myanmar" orthe Chinese tennis star "Peng Shuai"fast enough, while all but ignoring the most egregious assault on press freedom in our lifetime.

PEN Americaonly stopped accepting funding from the Israeli government which routinely censors and jails Palestinian journalists and writers in Israel and the occupied West Bank for the literary group's annualWorld Voicesfestival in New York in 2017 when more than 250 writers, poets and publishers, many members of PEN, signed an appeal calling on the CEO of PEN America, Suzanne Nossel, to end the organization's partnership with the Israeli government. The signatories includedWallace Shawn,Alice Walker,Eileen Myles, Louise Erdrich, Russell Banks,Cornel West,Junot Dazand Viet Thanh Nguyen. To stand up for Assange comes with a cost, as all moral imperatives do. And this is a cost the careerists and Democratic Party apparatchiks, who leverage corporate money and corporate backing to seize and deform these organizations into appendages of the ruling class, do not intend to pay.

PEN America is typical of the establishment hijacking of an organization that was founded and once run by writers, some of whom, including Susan Sontag and Norman Mailer, I knew. Nossel is a former corporate lawyer,listed as a "contributor"to the Federalist Society, who worked for McKinsey & Company and as vice president of U.S. business development for Bertelsmann.Nossel, who has had herself elevated to the position ofCEO of PEN America, also worked under Hillary Clinton in the State Department, including on the task force assigned to respond to the WikiLeaks revelations. I withdrew from a scheduled speaking event at the 2013 World Voices Festival in New Yorkandresignedfrom the organization, which that same year had given me itsFirst Amendment Award, to protest Nossel's appointment. PEN Canada offered me membership, which I accepted.

Nossel and PEN America have stated that the prosecution of Assange raises "grave concerns" about press freedom and lauded the decision by a British court in January 2012not to extradite Assange. Should Nossel and PEN America have not taken this stance on Assange, it would have left them in opposition to most PEN organizations around the world. PEN Centre Germany, for example,made Assange an honorary member. PEN International has called for all charges to be dropped against Assange.

RELATED:The execution of Julian Assange: He exposed the crimes of empire and that can't be tolerated

But Nossel, at the same time, repeats every slanderous trope and lie used to discredit the WikiLeaks publisher who now facesextradition to the United States to potentially serve a 175-year sentence under the Espionage Act. She refuses to acknowledge that Assange is being persecuted because he carried out the most basic and important role of any publisher, making public documents that expose the multitudinous crimes and lies of empire. And I have not seen any direct appeals to the Biden administration on Assange's behalf from PEN America.

"Whether Assange is a journalist or WikiLeaks qualifies as a press outlet is immaterial to the counts set out here," Nossel hassaid. Butas a lawyer who was a member of the State Department task force that responded to the WikiLeaks revelations, she understands it is not immaterial. The core argument behind the U.S. effort to extradite Assange revolves around denying him the status of a publisher or a journalist and denying WikiLeaks the status of a press publication. Nossel parrots the litany of false charges leveled against Assange, including that he endangered lives by not redacting documents, hacked into a government computer and meddled in the 2016 elections, all key points in the government's case against Assange. PEN America, under her direction, has sent out news briefswith headlines such as: "Security Reports Reveal How Assange Turned an Embassy into a Command Post for Election Meddling." The end result is that PEN America is helping to uncoil the rope to string up the WikiLeaks publisher, a gross betrayal of the core mission of PEN.

"There are some things Assange did in this case, or is alleged to have done, that go beyond what a mainstream news outlet would do, in particular the first indictment that was brought about five weeks ago focused specifically on this charge of computer hacking, hacking into a password to get beyond the government national security infrastructure and penetrate and allow Chelsea Manning to pass through all of these documents. That, I think you can say, is not what a mainstream news outlet or a journalist would do," Nosselsaid on the Brian Lehrer Show on WNYC on May 28, 2019.

But Nossel did not stop there, going on to defend the legitimacy of the U.S. campaign to extradite Assange, although Assange is not a U.S. citizen and WikiLeaks is not a U.S.-based publication. Most important, and left unmentioned by Nossel, is that Assange has not committed any crimes.

RELATED:Julian Assange and the future of democracy: Is this a turning point in World War IV?

"The reason that this indictment is coming down now is because Assange has been holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London for years trying to escape his extradition request," she said on the program. "He faces an extradition request to Sweden where he has been charged with sexual assault and now this huge indictment here in the U.S., and that proceeding will play out over a long period. He will make all sorts of arguments about why he faces a form of legal jeopardy that should immunize him from being extradited. But there are extradition treaties, there are legal assistance treaties where countries are able to prosecute nationals of other countries and bring them back to face charges when they have committed a crime. This is happening pursuant to that. There are U.S. nationals who are charged and convicted in foreign courts."

WikiLeaks releasedU.S. military war logsfrom Afghanistan and Iraq, a cache of 250,000 diplomatic cables and 800 Guantnamo Bay detainee assessment briefs along with the 2007 "Collateral Murder" video, in which U.S. helicopter pilots banter as they gun down civilians, including children and two Reuters journalists, in a Baghdad street. The material was given to WikiLeaks in 2010 by Chelsea Manning, then known as Pfc. Bradley Manning. Assange has been accused by an enraged U.S. intelligence community of causing "one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of the United States." Mike Pompeo, who headed the CIA (and then the State Department) under Donald Trump, called WikiLeaks a "hostile intelligence service" aided by Russia, rhetoric embraced by Democratic Party leaders.

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

Assange also published 70,000 hacked emails copied from the accounts of John Podesta, Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman, and earned the eternal hatred of the Democratic Party establishment. The Podesta emails exposed the sleazy and corrupt world of the Clintons, including the donation of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, andidentified both nations as major funders of the Islamic State. They exposed the $657,000 that Goldman Sachs paid to Hillary Clinton to give talks, a sum so large it can only be considered a bribe. They exposed Clinton's repeated dishonesty. She was caught telling the financial elites that she wanted "open trade and open borders" and believed Wall Street executives were best positioned to manage the economy, while publicly promising financial regulation and reform. The cache showed that the Clinton campaign interfered in the Republican primaries to ensure that Donald Trump was the Republican nominee, assuming he would be the easiest candidate to defeat. They exposed Clinton's advance knowledge of questions in a primary debate and her role as the principal architect of the war in Libya, a war she believed would burnish her credentials as a presidential candidate.

The Democratic Party, which blames Russian interference for its election loss to Trump, charges that the Podesta emails were obtained by Russian government hackers. Hillary Clinton calls WikiLeaks a Russian front.James Comey, the former FBI director, however, conceded that the emails were probably delivered to WikiLeaks by an intermediary, and Assange has said the emails were not provided by "state actors."

"A zealous prosecutor is going to look at someone like Assange and recognize that he's a very unpopular figure for a hundred different reasons, whether it's his meddling in the 2016 elections, his political motivations for that, or the blunderbuss nature of these disclosures," Nossel said on Lehrer's program. "This is not a leak that was designed to expose one particular policy or effectuate a specific change in how the U.S. government was going about its business. It was massive and indiscriminate, while in the beginning they worked with journalists to be careful about redacting names of individuals. I was actually working at the State Department during the WikiLeaks disclosure period, and I was briefly on a task force to respond to the WikiLeaks disclosures and there was really a sense of alarm about individuals whose lives would be in danger, people who had worked with the U.S., provided information, human rights defenders who had spoken to embassy personnel on a confidential basis. There is a problem of over-classification, but there is also good reason to classify a lot of this stuff and they made no distinction between that [which] was legitimately classified and not."

RELATED:Why the Julian Assange case is the most important battle for press freedom of our time

Any group of artists or writers overseen by a CEO from corporate America inevitably become members of an updated version of the Union of Soviet Writers, where the human rights violations by our enemies are heinous crimes and our own violations and those of our allies are ignored or whitewashed. As Julian Benda reminded us in "The Treason of the Intellectuals," we can serve privilege and power or we can serve justice and truth. Those, Benda warns, who become apologists for those with privilege and power destroy their capacity to defend justice and truth.

Where is the outrage from an organization founded by writers to protect writers about the prolonged abuse, stress and repeated death threats, including from Nossel's former boss, Hillary Clinton, who allegedly quipped at a staff meeting, "Can't we just drone this guy?" (anddidn't deny it later) or from the CIA, whichdiscussed kidnapping and assassinatingAssange? Where is the demand that the trial of Assange be thrown out becausethe CIA, through UC Global, the security firm at the Ecuadorian embassy, secretly taped the meetings, and all other encounters, between Assange and his lawyers, obliterating attorney-client privilege? Where is the public denunciation of the extreme isolation that has left Assange, who suffered a stroke during court video proceedings on Oct. 27, in precarious physical and psychological health? Where is the outcry over his descent into hallucinations and deep depression, leaving him dependent on antidepressant medication and the antipsychotic quetiapine? Where are the thunderous condemnations about the 10 years he has been detained, seven in the Ecuadorian embassy in London and nearly three in the high-security Belmarsh prison, where he has had to live without access to sunlight, exercise and proper medical care? "His eyes were out of sync, his right eyelid would not close, his memory was blurry," his fiance Stella Morris said of the stroke. Where are the demands for intervention and humane treatment, including an end to his isolation, once it was revealed Assange was pacing his cell until he collapsed, punching himself in the face and banging his head against the wall? Where is the fear for his life, especially after "half of a razor blade" was discovered under his socks and it was revealed that he called the suicide hotline run by the Samaritans because he thought about killing himself "hundreds of times a day"? Where is the call to prosecute those who committed the war crimes, carried out the torture and engaged in the corruption WikiLeaks exposed? Not from PEN America.

Melzer,in his book"The Trial of Julian Assange," the most methodical and detailed recounting of the long persecution by the United States and the British government of Assange, blasts those like Nossel who blithely peddle the lies used to tar Assange and cater to the powerful.

When Assange was first charged, he was not charged with espionage by the United States. Rather, he was charged with a single count of "conspiracy to commit computer intrusion." This charge alleged that he conspired with Manning to decrypt a password hash for the Department of Defense computer system. But as Melzer points out:

Manning already had full "top secret"access privileges to the system and all the documents she leaked to Assange. So, even according to the U.S. government, the point of the alleged attempt to decode the password hash was not to gain unauthorized access to classified information ("hacking"), but to help Manning to cover her tracks inside the system by logging in with a different identity ("source protection"). In any case, the alleged attempt undisputedly remained unsuccessful and did not result in any harm whatsoever.

Nossel's repetition of the lie that Assange endangered lives by not redacting documents was obliterated during the trial of Manning, several sessions of which I attended at Fort Meade in Maryland with Cornel West. During the court proceedings in July 2013, Brig.Gen.Robert Carr, a senior counterintelligence officer who headed the Information Review Task Force that investigated the impact of WikiLeaks disclosures on behalf of the Department of Defense, told the court that the task force did not uncover a single case of someone who lost their lives due to the publication of the classified documents by WikiLeaks. As for Nossel's claim that "in the beginning they worked with journalists to be careful about redacting names of individuals," she should be aware that the decryption key to the unredacted State Department documents was not released by Assange, but Luke Harding and David Leigh of the Guardian in their book "WikiLeaks: Inside Julian Assange's War on Secrecy."

RELATED:Former congressman offered Trump pardon to Julian Assange in exchange for discrediting Russia probe

When the ruling class peddles lies, there is no cost for parroting them back to the public. The cost is paid by those who tell the truth.

On Nov.27, 2019, Melzer gave a talk at the Brandenburg Gate in Berlinto dedicate a sculptureby the Italian artist Davide Dormino. Figures of Edward Snowden, Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning, cast in bronze, stood on three chairs. A fourth chair, empty, was next to them, inviting others to take a stand with them. The sculpture is called "Anything to Say?" Melzer stepped up onto the fourth chair, the hulking edifice of the U.S. embassy off to his right. He uttered the words that should have come from organizations like PEN America:

For decades, political dissidents have been welcomed by the West with open arms, because in their fight for human rights they were persecuted by dictatorial regimes.

Today, however, Western dissidents themselves are forced to seek asylum elsewhere, such as Edward Snowden in Russia or, until recently, Julian Assange at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

For the West itself has begun to persecute its own dissidents, to subject them to draconian punishments in political show trials, and to imprison them as dangerous terrorists in high-security prisons under conditions that can only be described as inhuman and degrading.

Our governments feel threatened by Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowdenand Julian Assange, because they are whistleblowers, journalistsand human rights activists who have provided solid evidence for the abuse, corruptionand war crimes of the powerful, for which they are now being systematically defamed and persecuted.

They are the political dissidents of the West, and their persecution is today's witch hunt, because they threaten the privileges of unsupervised state power that has gone out of control.

The cases of Manning, Snowden, Assange and others are the most important test of our time for the credibility of Western rule of law and democracy and our commitment to human rights.

In all these cases, it is not about the person, the character or possible misconduct of these dissidents, but about how our governments deal with revelations abouttheir own misconduct.

How many soldiers have been held accountable for the massacre of civilians shown in the video "Collateral Murder"? How many agents for the systematic torture of terror suspects? How many politicians and CEOs for the corrupt and inhumane machinations that have been brought to light by our dissidents?

That's what this is about. It is about the integrity of the rule of law, the credibility of our democracies and, ultimately, about our own human dignity and the future of our children.

Let us never forget that!

The tenuous return to power of the Democratic Party under Joe Biden, and the specter of a Republican rout of the Democrats in the midterm elections next year, along with the very real possibility of the election in 2024 of Donald Trump, or a Trump-like figure, to the presidency, has blinded human rights and press groups to the danger of the egregious assaults on freedom of expression perpetrated by the Biden administration.

The steady march towards heavy-handed state censorship was accelerated by the Obama administration, whichcharged 10 government employees and contractors, eight under the Espionage Act, for disclosing classified information to the press. The Obama administration in 2013 also seized the phone records of 20 Associated Press reporters to uncover who leaked the information about a foiled al-Qaida terrorist plot. This ongoing assault by the Democratic Party has been accompanied by the disappearing on social media platforms of several luminaries on the far right, including Donald Trump and Alex Jones, who were removed from Facebook, Apple, YouTube. Content that is true but damaging to the Democratic Party, including the revelations from Hunter Biden's laptop, have been blocked by digital platforms such as Facebook and Twitter. Algorithms have, since at least 2017, marginalized left-wing content, including my own.

The legal precedent set in this atmosphere by the sentencing of Assange means that anyone who possesses classified material, or anyone who leaks it, will be guilty of a criminal offense. The sentencing of Assange will signal the end of all investigative inquiries into the inner workings of power. The pandering by press and human rights organizations, tasked with being sentinels of freedom, to the Democratic Partyonly contributes to the steady tightening of the vise of press censorship. There is no lesser evil in this fight. It is all evil. Left unchecked, it will result in an American species of China's totalitarian capitalism.

See the original post:
PEN America, the "human rights" careerists and the betrayal of Julian Assange - Salon

When Vinoth voluntarily asked Ajith Kumar whether he would like to watch the rough cut of the film, the actor said: "no". Sources say that Ajith completely trusts Vinoth's vision and even told the director that he would watch the film after the censor screening.

Ajith also specifically told Vinoth to go ahead and edit the film as per his vision. No one other than Vinoth has seen the film so far. Of course, Ajith and other actors have seen their portions while dubbing for their lines in the film.

Produced by Boney Kapoor, the screening for the CBFC officials will happen either by the end of this week or early next week. The makers are also working on the trailer but they haven't confirmed the release date yet.

Produced by Boney Kapoor, Valimai is all set to release this Pongal.

See the original post here:
Ajith completely trusts Vinoth's vision, will be watching the film after censor! - Sify

RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL Virtually all Omicron cases in Denmark were reported in vaccinated individuals, most of whom were fully vaccinated, new data from the Danish government show.

Seventy-nine percent of Danes who had contracted Omicron by Dec. 15 were fully vaccinated. Thats according to a report released Tuesday by the Statens Serum Institut (SSI), a Danish health ministry that tracks suspected COVID-19 variants.

Of the 17,767 Omicron infections (as per December 15) registered in Denmark since the first case was reported on Nov. 22, more than 14,000 were among people with dual vaccinations.

Those who had received booster vaccination accounted for another 10.6% of cases of the new variant, and single-dose injectors accounted for another 1.8%. The unvaccinated, about one-fifth of the Danish population, accounted for only 8.5 percent of Omicron infections.

Vaccinated individuals also controlled cases of other suspected COVID-19 strains. More than three-quarters of Danes who had contracted delta or another variant in addition to Omicron between Nov. 22 and Dec. 15 received at least one dose, and 73% received a vaccination or the entire course of treatment, according to ISS data.

In Denmark, 77.6% of the population was fully vaccinated as of Sunday, including 35% of residents who have received the third dose since the Scandinavian country began rolling out booster doses to the general public last month.

Consistent with the official narrative and its data, Denmark currently has one of the highest infection rates in the world and the second-highest Omicron rate in Europe, behind the United Kingdom, which has similar vaccination rates and an even higher booster dose rate.

Danish government researchers have acknowledged that vaccination does not provide adequate protection against the putative Omicron variant, and some analyses suggest that it increases the risk of contracting it.

Experts also cautioned that a sharp increase in breakthrough cases might indicate primordial antigenic sin, which occurs when vaccination results in the inability to generate an effective immune response to a viral variant, leading to worse health outcomes for those vaccinated.

Nevertheless, COVID-19 is a treatable disease for the vast majority of people, and Omicron so far appears to be less lethal than previous strains.

According to ISS, only 0.6% of Danes with Omicron have been hospitalized since Nov. 22, compared with 1.6% for other variants during the same period.

Nevertheless, the Danish government responded with severe restrictions on Christmas: Cinemas and other public facilities have been closed, vaccination cards are required for buses and trains, and vaccination of children between the ages of 5 and 11 is being stepped up.

Booster vaccines will be available to Danes aged 40 and older as early as 4.5 months after the second dose.

Notably, Denmark had lifted all COVID measures in September and hailed vaccination as the way out of the pandemic. The epidemic is under control; we have a record vaccination rate, Heunicke had said at the time.

Here is the original post:
More than 90% of Omicron cases in Denmark are vaccinated individuals, government data show - The Rio Times

On any given day, the average American going about his daily business was monitored, surveilled, spied on and tracked in more than 20 different ways, by both government and corporate eyes and ears

By John W. Whitehead and Nisha Whitehead

Disgruntled mobs. Martial law. A populace under house arrest. A techno-corporate state wielding its power to immobilize huge swaths of the country. A Constitution in tatters.

Between the riots, lockdowns, political theater, and COVID-19 mandates, 2021 was one for the history books.

In our ongoing pursuit of life, liberty and happiness, here were some of the stumbling blocks that kept us fettered:

Riots, martial law and the Deep States coup.A simmering pot of political tensions boiled over on January 6, 2021, when protestersstormed the Capitolbecause the jailer of their choice didnt get chosen to knock heads for another four years. It took no time at all for the nations capital to be placed under a military lockdown, online speech forums restricted, and individuals with subversive or controversial viewpointsferreted out, investigated, shamed and/or shunned. The subsequentmilitary occupation of the nations capital by 25,000 troopsas part of the so-called peaceful transfer of power from one administration to the next was little more than martial law disguised as national security. TheJanuary 6 attemptto storm the Capitol by so-called insurrectionists created the perfect crisis for the Deep Statea.k.a. the Police State a.k.a. the Military Industrial Complex a.k.a. the Techno-Corporate State a.k.a. the Surveillance Stateto swoop in and take control.

The imperial president.All of theimperial powers amassed by Donald Trump, Barack Obama and George W. Bushto kill American citizens without due process, to detain suspects indefinitely, to strip Americans of their citizenship rights, to carry out mass surveillance on Americans without probable cause, to suspend laws during wartime, to disregard laws with which he might disagree, to conduct secret wars and convene secret courts, to sanction torture, to sidestep the legislatures and courts with executive orders and signing statements, to direct the military to operate beyond the reach of the law, to act as a dictator and a tyrant, above the law and beyond any real accountabilitywere inherited by Joe Biden, the nations 46thpresident.

The Surveillance State.On any given day, the average American going about his daily business was monitored, surveilled, spied on and tracked in more than 20 different ways, by both government and corporate eyes and ears. In such asurveillance ecosystem, were all suspects and databits to be tracked, catalogued and targeted. Consider that it took days, if not hours or minutes, for the FBI to begin the process of identifying, tracking and rounding up those suspected of being part of the Capitol riots. Imagine how quickly government agents could target and round up any segment of society they wanted to based on the digital trails and digital footprints we leave behind.

Digital tyranny.In response to the events of Jan. 6, the tech giants meted out their own version of social justice by way of digital tyranny and corporate censorship. Suddenly, individuals, including those who had no ties to the Capitol riots, began to experiencelock outs, suspensions and even deletions of their social media accounts. It signaled aturning point in the battle for control over digital speech, one that leaves we the people on the losing end of the bargain.

A new war on terror.Domestic terrorism, usedinterchangeablywith anti-government, extremist and terrorist, to describe anyone who might fall somewhere on a very broad spectrum of viewpoints that could be considered dangerous, became the new poster child for expanding the governments powers at the expense of civil liberties. As part of his inaugural address, President Biden pledged to wage war on so-calledpolitical extremism, ushering in what investigative journalist Glenn Greenwald described as a wave of new domestic police powersand rhetoric in the name of fighting terrorism that are carbon copies of many of the worst excesses of the first War on Terror that began nearly twenty years ago. The ramifications are so far-reaching as to render almost every American an extremist in word, deed, thought or by association.

Government violence.Thedeath penalty may have been abolished in Virginiain 2021, but government-sanctioned murder and mayhem continued unabated, with the U.S. government acting as judge, jury and executioner over a populace that had already been pre-judged and found guilty, stripped of their rights, and left to suffer at the hands of government agents trained to respond with the utmost degree of violence. Police particularlyposed a risk to anyone undergoing a mental health crisis or with special needs whose disabilities may not be immediately apparent.

Culture wars.Political correctness gave way to a more insidious form of group think and mob rule which, coupled with government and corporate censors and a cancel culture determined not to offend certain viewpoints, was all too willing to eradicate views that do not conform. Critical race theory also moved to the forefront of the culture wars.

Home invasions.Government agents routinelyviolated the Fourth Amendment at willunder the pretext of public health and safety. This doesnt even begin to touch on the many ways the government and its corporate partners-in-crime used surveillance technology to invade homes: with wiretaps, thermal imaging, surveillance cameras, and other monitoring devices. However, in a rare move, the Supreme Court put its foot down in two casesCaniglia v. StromandLange v. Californiato prevent police fromcarrying out warrantless home invasions in order to seize lawfully-owned guns under the pretext of their so-called community caretaking dutiesandfrom entering homes without warrants under the guise of being in hot pursuit of someone they suspect may have committed a crime.

Bodily integrity.Caught in the crosshairs of a showdown between the rights of the individual and the so-called emergency state, concerns about COVID-19 mandates and bodily integrity remained part of a much larger debate over the ongoing power struggle between the citizenry and the government over our property interest in our bodies. This debate over bodily integrity covered broad territory, ranging from abortion and forced vaccinations to biometric surveillance and basic healthcare. Forced vaccinations, forced cavity searches, forced colonoscopies, forced blood draws, forced breath-alcohol tests, forced DNA extractions, forced eye scans, forced inclusion in biometric databases: these were just a few ways in which Americans continued to be reminded that we have no control over what happens to our bodies during an encounter with government officials.

COVID-19.What started out as an apparent effort to prevent a novel coronavirus from sickening the nation (and the world) became yet another means by which world governments (including our own) expanded their powers, abused their authority, and further oppressed their constituents. Now that the government has gotten a taste for flexing its police state powers by way of a bevy of lockdowns, mandates, restrictions, contact tracing programs, heightened surveillance, censorship, overcriminalization, etc., it remains to be seen how the rights of the individual will hold up in the face of long-term COVID-19 authoritarianism.

Financial tyranny.Thenational debt(the amount the federal government has borrowed over the years and must pay back) exceeded$29 trillionand is growing. That translates to almost $230,000 per taxpayer. The amount this country owes is nowgreater than its gross domestic product(all the products and services produced in one yearby labor and property supplied by the citizens). That debt is also growing exponentially: it is expected to betwice the size of the U.S. economyby 2051. Meanwhile, the government continued to spend taxpayer money it didnt have on programs it couldnt afford; businesses shuttered for lack of customers, resources and employees; and consumers continued to encounterglobal supply chain shortages(and skyrocketing prices) on everything from computer chips and cars to construction materials.

Global Deep State.Owing in large part to the U.S. governments deep-seated and, in many cases, top-secret alliances with foreign nations and global corporations, it became increasingly obvious that we had entered into a new world ordera global world ordermade up of international government agencies and corporations. Weve been inching closer to this global world order for the past several decades, but COVID-19, which saw governmental and corporate interests become even more closely intertwined, shifted this transformation into high gear. Fascism became a global menace.

20 years of crises.Every crisismanufactured or otherwisesince the nations early beginnings has become a make-work opportunity for the government to expand its reach and its power at taxpayer expense while limiting our freedoms at every turn: The Great Depression. The World Wars. The 9/11 terror attacks. The COVID-19 pandemic. Indeed, the governments (mis)management of various states of emergency in the past 20 years from 9/11 to COVID-19 has spawned a massive security-industrial complex the likes of which have never been seen before.

The state of our nation.There may have been a new guy in charge this year, but for the most part, nothing changed. The nation remained politically polarized, controlled by forces beyond the purview of the average American, and rapidly moving the nation away from its freedom foundation. Over the past year, due in part to the COVID-19 pandemic, Americans found themselves repeatedly subjected to egregious civil liberties violations, invasive surveillance, martial law, lockdowns, political correctness, erosions of free speech, strip searches, police shootings of unarmed citizens, government spying, the criminalization of lawful activities, warmongering, etc.

In other words, as I make clear in my bookBattlefield America: The War on the American Peopleand in its fictional counterpartThe Erik Blair Diaries, the more things changed, the more they stayed the same.

See more here:
2021 Year In Review: Madness, Mayhem And Tyranny OpEd - Eurasia Review

Censorship is something that takes place in every country all around the world. Not all countries share the same forms of censorship or the same amounts of censorship, but in one way or another, all societies are affected by it. In a general sense censorship is the supervision and control of the information and ideas that are circulated among the people within a society. There are many different ways that censorship is implemented though. In the United States we are used to curse words being blocked out along with nudity which is most of the censorship we experience. In Poland and Ukraine however it is different. Censorship in those two countries is more like prevention by official government action of the circulation of messages. In Poland and Ukraine, the censorship that they experience has more of an effect on the societies, because they are not always exposed to the whole truth.

Media censorship can really hinder a society if it is bad enough. Because media is such a large part of peoples lives today and it is the source of basically all information, if the information is not being given in full or truthfully then the society is left uneducated. Both Poland and Ukraine experience this type of censorship but Ukraine experiences it more now because they are in a state of crisis. This type of censorship in these two countries is a setback in todays world. International communication and globalization are such major advances in our world, but if the information that is being given to these societies is one sided and only what the government wants them to hear, then they cannot fully understand and accept other countries and cultures.

Censorship is probably the number one way to lower peoples right to freedom of speech. When a journalist has to report on only what the government wants people to know, they do not have the freedom to express what they really want to. In the countries of Poland and Ukraine people have to be careful of the information they are putting out there because, although they are supposed to have the right to freedom of speech, there can be some serious consequences for their words and actions.

References:

http://www.worldissues360.com/index.php/how-censorship-affects-society-580/

http://www.targetgdpi.com/2014/03/media-censorship-good-or-bad.html

Go here to read the rest:
Censorship Effects on Society | World Wide Women

If you care about book challenges and censorship, one Supreme Court case you should familiarize yourself with which hasnt been cited nearly during this flux of challenges is Board of Education, Island Trees School District vs. Pico (Island Trees). This landmark 1982 case was the first to address the removal of books from school libraries across the country. Though it was a 5-4 split within the court, the ruling in favor of Pico meant that no school board could remove books from a library once itd been added, simply because they disagreed with the content within it.

Justice Brennan, in announcing the judgement which did not have a majority opinion to it, stated:

The Island Trees case came from an incident in the school district located in Levittown, New York, in 1975. A group which called themselves Parents of New York United submitted a list of 11 books they considered inappropriate to the school board, which then removed the books from the library and proceeded to send them through the review committee. Even though the committee said five of nine titles should be returned to shelves, the school board overruled the decision, returning only two (the other two books in question were a book in the junior high school that contained the satirical essay A Modest Proposal, and a book in the 12th grade curriculum, and both were removed).

The school board made this decision because they were anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-Sem[i]tic, and just plain filthy, according to the case syllabus.

Today In Books Newsletter

Sign up to Today In Books to receive daily news and miscellany from the world of books.

Thank you for signing up! Keep an eye on your inbox.

High school senior Steven Pico, in the case, helped bring the voices of four fellow high school students and one junior high school student into the story. All of them pushed back against the boards decision. They believed thanks, in part, to the precedent set with the Tinker vs. Des Moines case that their First Amendment rights were being violated.

One possible reason why this case hasnt been cited is that it wasnt legally binding because there wasnt a majority opinion. But because it also hasnt been challenged, it stands as a powerful reminder of a few things: this isnt and never has been the first time books in school libraries have been challenged, let alone that books by authors of color have been at the center of the discussion (the 11 titles included books by Piri Thomas, Langston Hughes, Richard Wright, Alice Childress, and Eldridge Cleaver); its not the first time that students have been forced to speak up for their First Amendment Rights; its noteworthy that the ruling stated this means books cannot be removed from school libraries because of disagreement with what they present (i.e., stories of those from the global majority and queer stories); that school boards have exerted more power than granted to them; and more.

When and if we begin to see lawsuits arising from todays censorship landscape, watch for Island Trees to be cited and revisited. The Supreme Court isnt stacked in favor of intellectual freedom right now, given the appointments made by the treasonous former administration, but prior rulings give weight to the reality that book censorship denies rights granted to young people in the First Amendment.

Onto this weeks book censorship news, with a toolkit for how to fight book bans and challenges, as well as how to spot fake news sites many of which are fueling these censorship attempts. Note: This will be the final roundup of 2021. Roundups will continue beginning the first full week of 2022.

Heres this weeks intellectual freedom hero:

And a couple more must-reads from authors experiencing challenges or outright censorship: author Jo Knowles talks about two of her queer-positive books being challenged in Texas and Derf Backderf talks about why his graphic memoir My Friend Dahmer has been banned.

Read the original here:
Can The 1982 Island Trees Case Impact Todays Book Censorship? This Weeks Book Censorship News... - Book Riot

OKLAHOMA CITY An Oklahoma lawmaker says he wants to put the teaching of slavery in America in context, but one of the nations leading historians, after reading the bill, called it radical legislation that amounts to outright censorship.

State Rep. Jim Olsen, R-Roland, said House Bill 2988 prohibits teaching slavery in Oklahoma public schools and universities in a way that might lead one to think America is worse than other nations in history or that one race is a unique victim or oppressor. He said anybody if they trace their lineage back far enough is eventually going to find slave owners in their family tree.

He also said his bill does not prohibit someone from teaching that slavery existed in America, but bans the teaching of the 1619 Project, which supporters say aims to reframe U.S. history by marking the year when the first enslaved Americans arrived on Virginia soil as our nations foundational date.

(Slavery) is a problem common to mankind, Olsen said. Thats not to excuse America or the evil of American slavery, but some of the folks behind this type of curriculum, they really hate America. And if you teach America with only its faults and flaws out of context, then young people grow up hating America.

He said the important thing is to teach slavery in context, noting that America was guilty of slavery but other nations and cultures were guilty, too. He said that of all the slave trade from Africa, America received just 3%.

The important thing is just to teach it in context, not to deny our own culpability, but not to present it in a way that America is more culpable than all other nations, Olsen said.

He acknowledged that primarily Black people were enslaved in America and owned by whites, but said there were some African American and Native American slave owners, too.

He said the measure, which he believes is the first of its kind, has garnered strong support among his colleagues. He also said a similar measure is in the works in Missouri.

Its very hard for a teacher to teach about slavery without emphasizing that in the United States (or) in the areas that would become the United States, it was generally white people who enslaved Black people, said James Grossman, executive director of the American Historical Association. Thats a fact, not an interpretation.

Grossman, author of books on the Black experience in America, said the measure is radical legislation that is either designed to indoctrinate Oklahoma students with a notion of history that is untrue or leave out some of the most important aspects of history.

He said 10 million Africans were kidnapped from Africa, and many of them died on the passage that brought them to the Western Hemisphere. Yes, slaves were not only brought to the United States, but also to the Caribbean and to Brazil, and Europeans also enslaved Africans, and Africans enslaved each other. But he said that doesnt change the fact that Americans bought and sold people of African descent.

And if you dont tell students that fact, they will be ignorant of American history, Grossman said. You could title this bill, To Ensure the Ignorance of American Youth.

He said historians both agree and disagree with aspects of the 1619 Project, but its not the business of the state legislature to prohibit teachers from assigning certain materials any more than its the business of the state legislature to prohibit libraries from putting materials in the library.

This is just outright censorship, he said.

He said he doesnt think Oklahoma would want its students to be unable to score high on the college-level Advanced Placement history exam, and doesnt believe the state would want its graduates to be ignorant of their own history. Employers, he said, want employees who can think critically, ask questions and are knowledgeable about their countrys past. This bill would make the state less competitive on the job market.

What theyre trying to do here is prevent teachers from helping students to understand the history of racism in the United States and the legacies of that history, Grossman said.

State Rep. Monroe Nichols, D-Tulsa, said that the measure goes beyond prohibiting the teaching of slavery. He said it suggests that slavery didnt really happen, wasnt an evil thing that happened in the country or as bad as it was in other countries.

Nichols, who also serves as vice chair of the Legislative Black Caucus, said he puts Olsen in the same box as those who deny the Holocaust, Sept. 11 terror attacks or Sandy Hook elementary school shooting.

His defense of slave owners does nothing to promote a better view of the foundations of this country, Nichols said.

He said throughout history there have always been sympathizers of folks who have tried to qualify some atrocity by saying it wasnt as bad as portrayed, or maybe it didnt happen.

Nichols said if Olsen believes slavery isnt being taught properly, perhaps the Legislature should require every student to complete a full course on the issue so that everyone can understand the full context of enslaved peoples around the world.

And, he said American slavery cant be taught without referencing race.

The teaching of slavery, the teaching of how slavery and discrimination has impacted this country to this day, is not to suggest that it is the fault of anybody living today or anything like that, Nichols said. It is, however, to help us all understand why we have gaps in achievement and opportunity in this country. Because it wasnt just about slavery.

At 38, Nichols, who is Black, said hes the first in his family to be born with all the rights that Americans are supposed to have.

Nichols also said its possible that Olsens bill has broad support among Republican lawmakers, but hopes it doesnt.

Things, although painful, can teach us a whole lot about what we have to do differently as a society, he said.

Janelle Stecklein covers the Oklahoma Statehouse for CNHI's newspapers and websites. Reach her at jstecklein@cnhinews.com.

We are making critical coverage of the coronavirus available for free. Please consider subscribing so we can continue to bring you the latest news and information on this developing story.

Go here to see the original:
Bill would legislate how slavery is taught, critic calls it "outright censorship" - Claremore Daily Progress

The corruption-plagued Cyprus government is tearing up textbook pages and seeking to censor artist Giorgos Gavriel.

Dr. Miranda Christou is a Senior Fellow at CARR and Associate Professor in Sociology of Education at the University of Cyprus.

The far-right party of ELAM is growing in Cyprus, the government is mired in corruption scandals and the Ministry of Education is tearing up textbook pages because they mention Atatrk. The artist and teacher, Giorgos Gavriel, has been capturing the spirit of the times in his provocative art, only to face disciplinary action for offending national figures. His artwork is featured in this article

The National Popular Front in Cyprus (Ethniko Laiko Metopo) ELAM doubled its representation in the Cyprus Parliamentary elections in May 2021, with a share of 6,78% (4 MPs). ELAM, an offshoot of Golden Dawn in Greece, is an ultra-nationalist, nativist and anti-immigrant party that maintains a hardline opposition to the bizonal, bicommunal federation as a solution to the division of Cyprus despite this being the official, established framework since the 1970s. More importantly, it has kept itself under the radar by avoiding the brazen neo-Nazi symbolism and violent outbursts of Golden Dawn, focusing instead on building an image of the good kids as the Cyprus Archbishop once called them.

This serious Golden Dawn of Cyprus is now heading an ad hoc parliamentary group on the demographic problem after tipping the scale to help the centre-right party of Democratic Rally (DISY), currently in power, win leadership in the Parliament. This move reflects a mainstreaming of ELAMs alarmist rhetoric on the arrival of refugees and asylum seekers whom they refer to as illegal migrants.

In their Fascism is website article, ELAM claims that: Fascism is when your country is in danger because of low fertility rates, when citizens are deprived of basic things but you continue to accept illegal immigrants, and, on top of that, to give them money when you have clearly exhausted the limits of your hospitality.

This twisting and upending of words by ELAM pushes further to the right the boundaries of public discourse on human suffering in a country that has constructed its ethnic identity around the pain and trauma of 1974 refugees. Recently, the Minister of Interior rushed to defend the government amidst reports that the authorities have been illegally pushing boats of asylum seekers back to the Lebanon shores or callously endangering children and minors by keeping them waiting at sea, under the harsh Cyprus sun. This same Minister had dabbled in apartheid politics and the Great Replacement language when he issued a decree that asylum seekers were not allowed to settle in a village area because their arrival caused social problems and demographic change.

Moments like these require unrelenting truthtelling. We take pride in being reader-funded. If you like our work, support our journalism.

The hypocrisy of those who proclaim faith in Christian values but maintain racist posturesELAMs slogan is country, religion, familyis called out by one of Giorgos Gavriels paintings which shows Christ in a refugee holding facility. Much of his work is provocative: a painting of Christ naked or a dog urinating on the Archbishop.

In September 2021, the Ministry of Education and Culture announced that Gavriel had to appear before the Educational Service Committee to apologize for an array of disciplinary charges, including insult to civil-religious institutions, religious symbols and historical-national figures of Cyprus. Following intense public outcry, the Presidents cabinet called off the investigation. The government was already exposed since the issue went all the way to the European Parliament and the Chair of the Committee on Culture and Education had raised concerns about violations of Gavriels freedom of expression.

Around the same time, officials at the Ministry of Education spotted a blurb in the English Language Textbooks (Oxford University Press) for Lyceum which read Turkeys greatest hero, and included a photo of Atatrk. This apparently rattled some high-ranking officials who issued a memo to schools to tear off that particular page. As the Ministry scrambled to save face, they decided to withdraw the book and order an investigation into decision-making procedures. Throughout all of these, ELAM insisted on censuring Gavriel and ridiculed those who condemned tearing off the pages of the book.

In Al-Jazeeras scathing video The Cyprus Papers, the (now former) head of the Cyprus Parliament was secretly recorded raising his wine glass and winking to seal the deal as a prominent lawyer explains in another scene: This is Cyprus! The context was the orchestration of a fake backroom deal where undercover journalists investigated whether Cypriot lawyers and officials would break the law in order to provide a passport to a shady billionaire character through the so-called Cyprus Investment Program. The answer was: absolutely.

After Al-Jazeera dropped the video, Anastasiades government scuttled to cancel the program and run an investigation. While the President distanced himself from the fiasco, his Golden Passports connections through the family law firm have been called out by anti-corruption groups.

But Anastasiades remains fully exposed: a European Parliament draft resolution on the Pandora Papers deplored his specific naming in the papers which provide financial documents linking political leaders to fishy transactions. The depth of the corruption problem in Cyprus has been duly recorded in Makarios Drousiotis book The Gang. An investigative journalist, Drousiotis had a front seat at the 2013 Eurogroup deals and argues that Anastasiades prioritized the interests of his Russian oligarch clients instead of the well-being of his own people.

Drousiotis was scheduled to appear on a national TV program after the Pandora Papers revelations strengthened his argument in The Gang which is still curiously ignored by the local mediahis appearance was canceled at the last minute due to scheduling conflicts.

Interestingly, in the summer of 2020, a few months before publication of The Gang, Drousiotis reported that he had been the victim of years-long surveillance into his documents and home security system. Drousiotis upcoming book Crime in Crans-Montana seals the deal: it argues that Anastasiades tanked the talks and that he was the one who proposed the two-state solution; an anathema to Greek Cypriots.

These revelations are not your average type of clientelism that has been battering Cypriot life and politics for centuries. They put Cyprus squarely on the level of a transnational crime syndicate masquerading as a government the way Sarah Kendzior describes USA politics in Hiding in Plain Sight. Notably, ELAM voted with Anastasiades party against registering the issue of Pandora Papers for Parliamentary discussion.

There have been glimpses of hope: Os Dame, (meaning enough!) a loosely connected network of progressive youth groups, organized rallies condemning government corruption and racist politics. In February 2021, the police used a water cannon to disperse their peaceful protest causing severe injuries and the partial blindness of a singer. Gavriel captured the scene: the Minister of Justice and Public Order (until recently, a close friend of Anastasiades daughters) standing over the singers wounded body.

All of these find ELAM in prime position: their rhetoric infiltrates the highest levels of government while they maintain their opposition to Anastasiades handling of the Cyprus problem. In the meantime, they can continue feeding off of the nihilism and disillusionment that has been eroding Greek Cypriot society that comes with the realization that the national interest is secondary to some politicians own self-interest.

This article is brought to you by the Centre for Analysis of the Radical Right (CARR). Through their research, CARR intends to lead discussions on the development of radical right extremism around the world. Rantt has been partnered with CARR for 3 years. Weve published over 150 articles from CARRs network of PhDs, historians, professors, and experts analyzing extremism and combating disinformation.

See the rest here:
The Rise Of Far-Right Educational Censorship And Corruption In Cyprus - Rantt Media