Category Archives: Censorship

September 20, 2013

I am currently in Manila for the on-campus component of my Masters in Journalism program at the Asian Centre for Journalism, Ateneo De Manila University. I was given this topic to lead a class discussion: State regulation or self-censorship? Which is more effective in limiting the contribution of a news media to the democratic process?

Let's begin by talking about democracy and the press.

There's an interesting quote from one of our readings. "Today, the Philippines is democratic, it has a free press, but remains trapped in a seemingly endless cycle of poverty and corruption. What good is freedom if close to one third of Filipino families continue to live below the poverty line?"

Let's look at the other side of the world the US, which is reputed to have the best model of free press. Like the Philippines, press freedom is enshrined in their respective constitutions. But the US owes so much money to China and the rest of the world that it is technically a bankrupt country. So what good is press freedom?

On the other hand, China, which has a state-regulated press like Malaysia, has emerged as a world economic dynamo. It is poised to overtake the US, assuming other things being equal.

The role of the press in China is development journalism. I was in China recently at the invitation of the Peoples' Daily, China's largest newspaper run by the Communist Party. It has a daily circulation of one million. Unashamedly, their role is to promote the "Chinese Dream" of bringing greater prosperity to China through a doctrine what they call "socialism with Chinese characteristics."

The problem with development journalism anywhere is that sooner or later, it would be hijacked to become state-sponsored journalism.

Their neighbour, India, is also another economic dynamo but India has a vibrant and free press. The Times of India has a daily circulation of three million.

In Indonesia, the government has eased up control of the media after the fall of the Suharto regime. The press there is freer than in Malaysia or Singapore.

Follow this link:
State regulation or self-censorship? - Bob Teoh

By BOB TEOH

I am currently in Manila for the on-campus component of my Masters in Journalism program at the Asian Centre for Journalism, Ateneo De Manila University. I was given this topic to lead a class discussion: State regulation or self-censorship? Which is more effective in limiting the contribution of a news media to the democratic process?

Let's begin by talking about democracy and the press.

There's an interesting quote from one of our readings. "Today, the Philippines is democratic, it has a free press, but remains trapped in a seemingly endless cycle of poverty and corruption. What good is freedom if close to one third of Filipino families continue to live below the poverty line?"

Let's look at the other side of the world the US, which is reputed to have the best model of free press. Like the Philippines, press freedom is enshrined in their respective constitutions. But the US owes so much money to China and the rest of the world that it is technically a bankrupt country. So what good is press freedom?

On the other hand, China, which has a state-regulated press like Malaysia, has emerged as a world economic dynamo. It is poised to overtake the US, assuming other things being equal.

The role of the press in China is development journalism. I was in China recently at the invitation of the Peoples' Daily, China's largest newspaper run by the Communist Party. It has a daily circulation of one million. Unashamedly, their role is to promote the "Chinese Dream" of bringing greater prosperity to China through a doctrine what they call "socialism with Chinese characteristics."

The problem with development journalism anywhere is that sooner or later, it would be hijacked to become state-sponsored journalism.

Their neighbour, India, is also another economic dynamo but India has a vibrant and free press. The Times of India has a daily circulation of three million.

In Indonesia, the government has eased up control of the media after the fall of the Suharto regime. The press there is freer than in Malaysia or Singapore.

Visit link:
State regulation or self-censorship?

"Bleep Ops 2" - HILARIOUS Black Ops 2 Censorship (Girl Voice, and Fake Fights!) #4
"Bleep Ops 2" - HILARIOUS Black Ops 2 Censorship (Girl Voice, and Fake Fights!) - If you enjoyed this video please don #39;t forget to hit that like button, subs...

By: GameMinds

Excerpt from:
"Bleep Ops 2" - HILARIOUS Black Ops 2 Censorship (Girl Voice, and Fake Fights!) #4 - Video

It's canceled.

Mike Ford

The Sodomite by Mike Ford

Ronnie Ray Mendez's Maria

That's what a box office clerk told artist Ronnie Ray Mendez on Friday, August 30, when he arrived at Herberger Theater Center to pick up promotional postcards for the exhibition "Prime Example," a group show curated by local gallery owner (and longtime New Times contributor) Robrt Pela and scheduled to open less than a week later, on September 5.

"An e-mail would've been nice," Mendez says.

Later that Friday, Herberger did send out an e-mail to its subscribers. The e-mail reiterated that "Prime Example" was canceled. Instead of the new exhibit featuring works from Mendez, Mike Ford, Suzanne Falk, and Geoffrey Gersten, "Show and Tell," curated by Phoenix artist Peter Bugg, would continue through early October.

The e-mail offered no further explanation, and the arts community cried foul.

"Welcome to Phoenix, where censorship is okay," Pela wrote on the show's Facebook event page. "And where corporate gallery owners apparently don't care that artists have spent months creating art for an upcoming exhibit."

Although it took a few days for all the details to come out, it's clear that "Prime Example" was canceled because Herberger objected to the content of some of the artwork Pela had chosen. Herberger officials have denied in multiple statements that this was an act of censorship, offering three different explanations as to why the show, which was on the books for two years, was abruptly called off.

Read more here:
Herberger Censorship Will Have Long-Term Impact

Internet Religious Censorship: Pakistani public suffers consequences of country #39;s YouTube ban
Many of Pakistan #39;s companies, educators and students say they have been negatively impacted by the YouTube ban that was imposed almost a year ago to block vi...

By: JewishNewsOne

See the original post here:
Internet Religious Censorship: Pakistani public suffers consequences of country's YouTube ban - Video

American professor Noam Chomsky silenced in Europe (Censorship Part 1)
Political activitist and highly intelligent and moral human being Noam Chomsky attempted to be silenced. Shocking how idiotic some people can be!

By: Apollonius Tyana

Follow this link:
American professor Noam Chomsky silenced in Europe (Censorship Part 1) - Video

YouTube selective enforcement censorship harassment censorship
FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a #39;fair use #39; of...

By: LiberatedGalaxy

Read more:
YouTube selective enforcement censorship harassment censorship - Video

China Censorship 2013 News
Protest over censorship of newspaper editorial.

By: tastatura qbvalles

Go here to read the rest:
China Censorship 2013 News - Video

The Governments controversial plan to force the countrys largest broadband ISPs into adopting network-level filtering systems, which would be used to help censor adult websites (Parental Controls), could suffer a delay after the minority Liberal Democrat side of the coalition voted against the measures.

The motion, F17 Protecting Children From Online Pornography, essentially called upon the LibDem partys Autumn Conference in Glasgow (Scotland) to support the governments overall strategy for enabling automatic opt-in network-level filtering of adult websites (Active Choice+) by the end of 2013 (details here and here).

Baroness Benjamin, Lib Dem Peer, said:

This motion is about protecting children from online pornography and inappropriate material its not about censorship or stopping adults from accessing legal material. Arguments about opt in, censorship or freedom of expression are simply not applicable here. This pandemic crosses a sacred line although the internet is a wonderful resource, it also has a dark side.

Motion F17 Summary (Mover: Baroness Benjamin)

Conference calls on the Government to..

1. Work with the software industry to introduce opt-in filters to explicit material on all new internet enabled electronic devices.

2. Ensure that those adults wishing to view pornographic material should be required to opt in to websites containing such material by providing verifiable proof of age.

3. Work with Internet Service Providers (ISPs) providers to police actively their platforms and filter out explicit material which is currently easily accessible to children.

4. Support parents to take a more active role in how their children use the internet and to understand the risks involved.

Here is the original post:
UPD2 UK ISP Launch of Child Internet Censorship Rules Face Possible Delay

Krista vs AVFM Censorship vs Free Expression part 1 of 2
this is a mirror of St37One #39;s flagged video. His channel can be found at https://www.youtube.com/user/St37One Part 2 of this video can be found at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adSSP0slyz4.

By: RBK_Depot7

Read more here:
Krista vs AVFM Censorship vs Free Expression part 1 of 2 - Video