Category Archives: Censorship

Unnecessary Censorship in League of Legends Part 4
We go back out to Summoner #39;s Rift to interview more of these champions and it has been apparent that more champions have an dirty side to them. We #39;ve been no...

By: DOA Gaming

Read the original post:
Unnecessary Censorship in League of Legends Part 4 - Video

Friday 24 January 2014 12.45

The Government has opposed the Censorship of Publications Board Repeal Bill 2013, which was put forward by Fianna Fil justice spokesperson Niall Collins in the Dil this morning.

Minister for Communications Pat Rabbittesaid it was a complex and technical area and that the Government would examine the matter.

Mr Collins said the response from the Government benches was "regrettable"and said he did not believe the minister outlined reasons why the bill was being opposed.

The Censorship of Publications Board was originally established in 1946 to ban the sale or publication of controversial publications.

Its five-year term of office expired in November 2011 and the new board has not been appointed yet.

There were chortles on both sides of the chamber when Mr Collins said the Censorship Board has had no members since 2011.

He said it has only been relevant once in the past five years - when it received a complaint about Minister for Justice Alan Shatter's novel Laura.

TOP STORIES

Story Comments

See original here:
Govt opposes call to abolish censorship board

Ben Swann on Spirituality, 9/11, Censorship, GeoEngineering
On January 18th Derrick caught up with independent journalist Ben Swann on a variety of topics. Contact us with ideas, comments, or criticisms: Derrick@theco...

By: DerrickBrozeLiveFree

Original post:
Ben Swann on Spirituality, 9/11, Censorship, GeoEngineering - Video

Censorship Motion Graphic - Harry Rance
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TwitchHD?skip_nax_wizard=true Twitter: https://twitter.com/TwitchHD =====...

By: TwitchHD

More here:
Censorship Motion Graphic - Harry Rance - Video

By Rebecca Blumenstein

Davos, Switzerland Google Chairman Eric Schmidt said the company is intent on using encryption technologies to penetrate countries with strict censorship rules, such as China and North Korea.

It is possible, within the next decade, using encryption, we would be able to open up countries that have strict censorship laws giving people a voice, Schmidt said on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum at Davos.

In the wake of the disclosures about surveillance by the National Security Agency, Schmidt said Google has been working to strengthen its encryption so governments wont be able to penetrate it. This creates a problem for governments like Chinas, Schmidt added.

Google moved its search services out of China in 2010 and relocated to Hong Kong, because of concerns about censorship and cyberattacks, but Schmidt said that the company watches developments there closely. He said that YouTube is totally blocked and that Gmail works sporadically.

Schmidt said the growing number of people using social media in China will ultimately overcome government censorship.

The Google chairman said he views the Chinese as technological equals, but he blamed them for most of the worlds industrial espionage. Eighty to 85% of industrial espionage is thought to be done by China. Its a real problem. No other country comes close, Schmidt said.

Schmidt said the global debate over privacy sparked by the NSA disclosures is a good thing. Because you can do this monitoring does not mean you should do this monitoring, he said.

Asked about comments by a Microsoft executive that the company may allow non-U.S. customers to store their data outside the U.S., Schmidt said, I dont understand it.

Read more:
Schmidt Says Encryption Will Help Google Penetrate China

Internet Censorship Tightens on Anniversary of Zhao Ziyang #39;s Death
Follow us on TWITTER: http://twitter.com/cnforbiddennews Like us on FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/chinaforbiddennews Nine years after former Chinese prem...

By: ChinaForbiddenNews

See the article here:
Internet Censorship Tightens on Anniversary of Zhao Ziyang's Death - Video

A firm specializing in censorship-evading technology on Wednesday blamed a massive breakdown of China's internet on website address "hijacking" tools used by authorities there.

"In 2002, China started to use DNS hijacking technology to block web sites," said US-based Dynamic Internet Technology, which runs a tool called FreeGate designed to bypass Chinese Internet censors.

"On January 21, 2014, there was a large-scale internet breakdown in China caused by this DNS hijacking system."

Internet users were sent to an IP address operated by Dynamic Internet Technology, which runs FreeGate. The website was registered to a shell company at an address in Wyoming, according to DIT.

The IP address -- 65.49.2.178 -- is linked to dongtaiwang.com, a news portal run by Falun Gong members, Greatfire.org said.

Falun Gong is a Buddhist-inspired religious group that was banned in China in 1999 and branded an "evil cult."

Dynamic Internet Technology lists as clients on its website the Epoch Times -- a publication linked to the spiritual movement -- along with Human Rights in China and other groups.

Cyber-monitoring group Greatfire.org blamed China censors for the fiasco, and DIT backed that contention in a release posted at its website.

The domain name system, or DNS, is essentially an addressing method that lets computers know where to go to find websites on the Internet.

DNS hijacking happens when someone, say, a censor, intercepts transmissions between computers and sends back a wrong address directing an Internet user away from banned online destinations.

Originally posted here:
China internet breakdown blamed on web address hijack tools

DAVOS, Switzerland, Jan. 22 (UPI) -- The future of the Internet will be the focus of a major independent commission announced by officials Wednesday at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland.

The group will focus primarily on state censorship of the Internet and the issues of privacy and surveillance, the British newspaper the Guardian reported.

The commission was formed in the wake of disclosures by former U.S. National Security Agency analyst Edward Snowden of massive spying efforts by the United States and Britain.

To be headed by Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt, the commission will be comprised of 25 people chosen from the fields of politics, academics, and intelligence who will lead a series of public forums around the world.

"The rapid evolution of the net has been made possible by the open and flexible model by which it has evolved and been governed," Bildt said as the commission was announced. "But increasingly this is coming under attack. And this is happening as issues of net freedom, net security and net surveillance are increasingly debated. Net freedom is as fundamental as freedom of information and freedom of speech in our societies."

The two-year inquiry was set up Chatham House, a think tank of Britain's foreign office, and the Center for International Governance and Innovation (CIGI), which is funded in part by Canada.

In a joint statement, Chatham House and CIGI said the Internet was under threat by two sources: states attempting to exert tighter controls over Internet resources and extensive spying on messages and data sent through the Internet.

Chatham House director Robin Niblet said Internet governance "is set to become one of the most pressing global policy issues of our time."

Excerpt from:
Global commission to study Internet censorship, privacy issues

Censorship should not be looked at as taking away an individuals rights, but rather empowering someone to make appropriate choices while benefiting the masses.

Without censorship affecting the type of programs that can be aired at certain times, parents would have to be hyper-vigilant about allowing their children to watch television. Without this kind of censorship, young children would likely be exposed to sexual and violent content regularly.

If adults wish to watch this kind of content, it is as easy as turning on the TV late at night or renting other titles they want to watch instead. Censoring content at certain times of the day and night protects children while posing only a minor inconvenience to adult viewers.

Censorship is too often looked at in negative light. By limiting explicit material on television, this gives adults more control of the entertainment they or their children are exposed to. It also ensures those who are triggered by questionable content will not accidentally stumble upon something that could have a negative impact on them.

Censorship does not take away peoples freedoms. Film and television ratings provide parents a quick and accessible way to review the type of content they and their kids consume. If parents do not care about the content their children consume, such media is readily available.

Of course, people may argue bleeping out adult language from a movie shown on television ruins its integrity. However, this is untrue because it is relatively easy for adults to still understand the original words that are being bleeped out, and it is beneficial to kids because they may not understand and be exposed to the profanity.

If television was not censored and films were not rated, it could be difficult for families to find suitable content for their children to watch. Mild media censorship is important in helping parents keep their children from being exposed to questionable material.

Censorship in a democratic society should never be tolerated.

Censorship in essence deems one thing as right while another is wrongsomething which is subjective and constantly up for debate. What is deemed obscene or inappropriate by some may be the complete antithesis to another. Laws regulating subjective ideas like obscenity and inappropriateness should not exist.

See the rest here:
Defending the First Amendment since 1911 | The independent student newspaper of Texas State University

Hundreds of millions of Internet users in China were unexpectedly shown a way to overcome the communist countrys strict firewalls on Tuesday afternoon.

The users were simply attempting to access some of the countrys most popular websites. When they typed in the addresses, they were automatically redirected to the homepage of Dynamic Internet Technology (DIT), a U.S. company that sells anti-censorship technology that allows Chinese citizens to get around the so-called Great Firewall.

It is unclear whether the situation was the work of savvy hackers or the result of some kind of glitch in the Great Firewall.

Reuters reports that DIT has ties to the Falun Gong, a spiritual group banned in China that has been blamed for past hacking attacks.

I dont know who did this or where it came from, but what I want to point out is this reminds us once again that maintaining Internet security needs strengthened international cooperation. This again shows that China is a victim of hacking," Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Qin Gang said in a daily news briefing.

The state-run China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) said the attack on the countrys Internet is under investigation, the official CCTV broadcaster wrote on its microblog on Wednesday.

However, sources familiar with the Chinese governments web management operations told Reutersthat a hacking attack was not to blame for the malfunction. They declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter.

They said the incident may have been the result of an engineering mistake made while making changes to the Great Firewall.

Our investigation shows very clearly that DNS exclusion happened at servers inside of China, said Xiao Qiang, an adjunct professor at UC Berkeley School of Information and an expert on Chinas Internet controls.

It all points to the Great Firewall, because thats where it can simultaneously influence DNS resolutions of all the different networks [in China]. But how that happened or why that happened were not sure. Its definitely not the Great Firewalls normal behavior.

See the article here:
China Internet outage redirects users to anti-censorship site