Category Archives: Censorship

David Levine Alexander Solzhenitsyn

What is censorship?

If the concept of censorship is extended to everything, it means nothing. It should not be trivialized. Although I would agree that power is exerted in many ways, I think it crucial to distinguish between the kind of power that is monopolized by the state (or other constituted authorities such as religious organizations in some cases) and power that exists everywhere else in society. Censorship as I understand it is essentially political; it is wielded by the state.

Not that all states impose sanctions in the same way. Their actions might be arbitrary, but they clothe them in procedures that had a tincture of legality. One of the striking aspects of the dossiers from the Bastille is the effort by the police to ferret out clues and establish guilt by rigorous interrogations, even though the prisoners had no legal defense. Under the pressure of circumstances, trials in the British Raj returned the expected verdicts, yet they adopted elaborate ceremonies to act out the rule of British law and affirm the fiction of freedom of the press. Walter Jankas conviction in Berlin for publishing an author who fell out of favor (Lukcs) was a ceremony of a different kind: a show trial orchestrated in Stalinist fashion to launch a purge and to signal a change in the Party line. The line determined legitimacy in a system that had no room for civil rights.

Reading was an essential aspect of censoring, not only in the act of vetting texts, which often led to competing exegeses, but also as an aspect of the inner workings of the state, because contested readings could lead to power struggles, which sometimes led to public scandals. Not only did censors perceive nuances of hidden meaning, but they also understood the way published texts reverberated in the public. Their sophistication should not be surprising in the case of the GDR, because they included authors, scholars, and critics. Eminent authors also functioned as censors in eighteenth-century France, and the surveillance of vernacular literatures in India was carried out by learned librarians as well as district officers with a keen eye for the folkways of the natives. To dismiss censorship as crude repression by ignorant bureaucrats is to get it wrong. Although it varied enormously, it usually was a complex process that required talent and training and that extended deep into the social order.

It also could be positive. The approbations of the French censors testified to the excellence of the books deemed worthy of a royal privilege. They often resemble promotional blurbs on the back of the dust jackets on books today. Column 16 in the secret catalogues of the India Civil Service sometimes read like modern book reviews, and they frequently lauded the books they kept under surveillance. While acting as censors, East German editors worked hard to improve the quality of the texts they vetted. Despite its ideological function, the reworking of texts had resemblances to the editing done by professionals in open societies. From start to finish, the novels of the GDR bore the marks of intervention by the censors. Some censors complained that they had done most of the work.

Negotiation occurred at every level, but especially at the early stages when a text began to take shape. That did not happen in the Raj, where censorship was restricted to post-publication repression, nor did it affect the literature that circulated outside the system in eighteenth-century France. But even Voltaire, when he published legal or quasi-legal works, negotiated with censors, their superiors, influential intermediaries, and the police. He knew how to manipulate all the gears and levers of the power apparatus, and he was an expert in using it for his benefit. For East German authors like Erich Loest and Volker Braun, negotiation was so important that it could hardly be distinguished from the publication process. They sometimes spent more time haggling over passages than writing them. The parties on both sides understood the nature of the give-and-take. They shared a sense of participating in the same game, accepting its rules, and respecting their opposite number.

Consider Aleksandr Solzhenitsyns account of his experience in The Oak and the Calf, published in 1975, a year after his expulsion from the Soviet Union. When you open it, you expect to encounter the voice of a prophet, crying in the wilderness; and you wont be disappointed, for Solzhenitsyn casts himself as a Jeremiah. Yet he recounts much of his story in a surprising register: shrewd, precise, ironic, and sociologically rich observations of how literature functioned as a power system in a Stalinist society. We meet him first in the gulag. During eight years of labor in the prison camps, he writes about the misery around him, and he continues writing after his release while living miserably as a teacher. He writes in isolation and with total freedom, because he knows he cannot publish anything. His words will not be read until long after his death. But he must keep them secret. He memorizes them, writes them in a minute hand on thin strips of paper, and rolls the paper into cylinders, which he squeezes into a bottle and buries in the ground. As manuscript follows manuscript, he continues to hide them in the safest, most unlikely places. Then, to his amazement, Khrushchev denounces the excesses of Stalin at the Twenty-Second Party Congress in 1961, and Aleksandr Tvardovsky, the editor of Novy Mir, the most important review in the USSR, proclaims a readiness to publish bolder texts. Solzhenitsyn decides to take a risk. He rewrites, in milder form, the work that will eventually break through the wall of silence about the atrocities of the gulag under the title A Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich; and he submits it to Novy Mir.

At this point, Solzhenitsyns narrative turns into a kind of sociology. He describes all the editors at the review, their rivalries, self-protective maneuvers, and struggles to stifle the bomb that he has planted in their midst. Aleksandr Dementyev, the intelligent, duplicitous agent of the Central Committee of the Party, sets traps and erects barriers during editorial conferences, but Tvardovsky is torn. As a genuine poet with roots in the peasantry, his first loyalty was to Russian literature, with its devout belief in the moral duty of the writer. Yet he also felt compelled by the Partys truth. In the end, he prevails over his own doubts and the doubters on the staff, and he goes over the manuscript line by line with Solzhenitsyn, negotiating changes. Solzhenitsyn is willing to make them, up to a point, because he understands that the text must be modified enough to pass through the obstacle course that constitutes literary reality.

The course itself is describedleaked copies, huddled conversations in corridors of power, a reading before Khrushchev in his dacha, and approval by the Presidium (Politburo). The official censors, kept in the dark, are horrified when they see the proofs. But they praise the book when it goes to press, having been informed at the last minute that it received the approval of the Central Committee. The work creates a sensation, and it could have been followed by the other books that Solzhenitsyn has prepared; but he holds them back, unwilling to make the necessary modificationsa strategic mistake, he sees in retrospect, because the window of opportunity will close when Brezhnev succeeds Khrushchev in 1964 and a new wave of Stalinization shuts down genuine literature, driving Solzhenitsyn, now notorious, into exile. For all its vivid detail, backed up by a great deal of documentation, the story does not come across as a journalistic expos. Nor does it invoke a Western view of freedom of speech. In a specifically Russian idiom, it proclaims a prophetic view of literature as a vehicle of truth.

Here is the original post:
The Soul of the Censor

The Bite (Unnecessary Censorship)
The B*** So, there was news that the original video was too #39;visual #39;, so i decided to censor them for a better viewing experience. Enjoy the Unnecessarily Censored version of THE BITE! Not...

By: nuahil

More:
The Bite (Unnecessary Censorship) - Video

Everyone knows about battles with the Motion Picture Association of America, in which directors and producers disagree with the board over a rating. The stories are plentiful, of being forced to cut a scene out of a film to get a lower rating, of a harsh rating given to a mild film, all that kind of stuff. You can kill literally millions of people in a movie and get a PG-13 if theres no blood, but three F-words in a family drama lands a film an R rating. Long story short, the MPAA is a joke, but its just the culmination of a long history of censorship in film.

If youre curious about what that long history entails, its told in a very brief manner by the team at CineFix. Their latest video in the Film SchoolD series is called A$$, ( . )( . ), and GUNS: Censorship in Cinema.In about 7 minutes, the video goes from the earliest instances of sex and violence in film through more modern fare like the doc, This Film Is Not Yet Rated. Check out the video below.

Thanks to CineFix for this video about the history of censorship in film.

Heres their description on YouTube:

Ever since we could show things on film, there have been people protesting that You cant show THAT on film! The result is the long and complicated history of censorship (Im sorry, advisories) in Hollywood.

Is the X rating really just censorship in disguise? Why can movies show as much violence as they want and still merit an R, but not so much with the sex? Well take you back to the earliest days of cinema, and show you how ratings in Hollywood (and Hollywoods home country, the U.S. of A.) got to the point they are today.

What did you think? Did we make you think differently about what movies you see, what movies youd let your kids see, or what you find offensive? We talked a lot about the ratings system in America but what about other countries?

Read the rest here:
VOTD: A Brief History of Censorship in Film

Ukraine: Watch protesters clash over Kiev media censorship
Video ID: 20140913-019 M/S Men arguing C/U Men arguing W/S Protesters M/S Protesters W/S Protesters M/S Protesters W/S Police standing guard M/S Police arres...

By: RuptlyTV

Read more:
Ukraine: Watch protesters clash over Kiev media censorship - Video

What is Censorship? - Free Talk Live 2014-09-12
Liberty Bits from Free Talk Live. For the best in liberty talk catch Free Talk Live every night of the week at 7pm - 10pm Eastern at http://lrn.fm Be sure to like Liberty Bits on Facebook....

By: Liberty Bits

More:
What is Censorship? - Free Talk Live 2014-09-12 - Video

censorship in cinema [funny video]
censorship in cinema [funny video] censorship in cinema [funny video] censorship in cinema [funny video] censorship in cinema [funny video] censorship in cinema [funny video] censorship in...

By: FunVideoBreak

Go here to see the original:
censorship in cinema [funny video] - Video

Chinese authorities have detained an 81-year-old journalist with a failing memory who recently criticized heavy censorship that he said is doing great damage to Chinas media.

Tie Liu, a writer and journalist who spent decades in work camps as a young man, had thought he was too old to draw the attention of authorities. He had for decades offered unvarnished opinions of the Chinese state, and recently directed withering criticism at Liu Yunshan, the elite politician and propaganda czar. In August, Mr. Tie released an online article accusing Mr. Liu of further sullying Chinas already obedient state press and making the media lose its credibility in China.

But at 1 a.m. on Sunday, his phone rang. Soon after, one of Beijings highest-ranking police officials was in his house, presenting him with a summons paper that accused him of causing a disturbance.

In the midst of a broad effort led by Chinese President Xi Jinping to stifle critical expression on the Internet, in churches and in the courts, even an octogenarian one who had recently agreed with his wife he would lay down the verbal hatchet at the end of this year is a target in China today.

Not long after police arrived, he was escorted from the house with a suit jacket over his pyjamas to protect against the cold in the deep of night, his wife, Ren Hengfang, said. Less than 24 hours later, after also arresting his domestic helper and publishing assistant, the police were back, with papers from cybersecurity police confirming he had been formally detained. He is being held at the Beijing municipal detention house.

The notice may have set a kind of grim record for China.

He might be the oldest suspect in China on charges of creating a disturbance, said Liu Xiaoyuan, a Chinese human-rights lawyer, on Twitter.

It also marks a return into state hands, a grimly familiar place for Mr. Tie, whose real name is Huang Zerong although he is best known by his pen name.

In the mid-1950s, in one of Mao Zedongs uglier social engineering efforts, Chinese people were encouraged to vent their problems with the Communist Party. The so-called Hundred Flowers Campaign brought fourth an outpouring of criticism. Mr. Tie contributed an article about civil servants. It was published in my newspaper and nobody thought much about it, he said in a 2010 interview with Radio Netherlands Worldwide.

Then, Mao changed course, labelled the critics rightists and oversaw a massive purge. All of a sudden, I was sent to a work camp for 23 years, Mr. Tie told RNW.

More:
Chinese authorities detain elderly journalist over censorship criticism

Ukraine: Hundreds protest Ukrainian government press censorship
Video ID: 20140912-038 M/S Man handing out Vesti newspapers M/S Man handing out Vesti newspapers M/S Vesti newspaper in a cage in front of EU office M/S People gathering, waving Vesti flags...

By: RuptlyTV

Read this article:
Ukraine: Hundreds protest Ukrainian government press censorship - Video

HARRY POTTER THE SORCERER #39;S STONE PT 1 | Unnecessary Censorship | Censored Parody Bleep Video
This Week in Unnecessary Censorship, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer #39;s Stone / Philosopher #39;s Stone! Sorcerer, philosopher, potato, po-tah-to. Who #39;s going to Un...

By: Ninja Panda Too

Here is the original post:
HARRY POTTER & THE SORCERER'S STONE PT 1 | Unnecessary Censorship | Censored Parody Bleep Video - Video

Alibaba #39;s Choice: Will it Agree With Chinas Censorship?
Sept. 12 (Bloomberg) Bloomberg #39;s Mia Saini examines the history of Alibaba #39;s relationship with China and United States investors weighing the risks of doing business with Alibaba. She...

By: Bloomberg News

See the article here:
Alibaba's Choice: Will it Agree With Chinas Censorship? - Video