Category Archives: Robotics

New Jersey, United States The Robotic Nurse Assistant Market Research Report is a professional asset that provides dynamic and statistical insights into regional and global markets. It includes a comprehensive study of the current scenario to safeguard the trends and prospects of the market. Robotic Nurse Assistant Research reports also track future technologies and developments. Thorough information on new products, and regional and market investments is provided in the report. This Robotic Nurse Assistant research report also scrutinizes all the elements businesses need to get unbiased data to help them understand the threats and challenges ahead of their business. The Service industry report further includes market shortcomings, stability, growth drivers, restraining factors, and opportunities over the forecast period.

Get Sample PDF Report with Table and Graphs:

https://www.a2zmarketresearch.com/sample-request/266660

The Major Manufacturers Covered in this Report @:

Hstar Technologies, Diligent Robotics, Toyota Motor Corporation, RIKEN-SRK, SoftBank Robotics, Panasonic, Fraunhofer IPA, Aethon.

Robotic Nurse Assistant Market Overview:

This systematic research study provides an inside-out assessment of the Robotic Nurse Assistant market while proposing significant fragments of knowledge, chronic insights and industry-approved and measurably maintained Service market conjectures. Furthermore, a controlled and formal collection of assumptions and strategies was used to construct this in-depth examination.

During the development of this Robotic Nurse Assistant research report, the driving factors of the market are investigated. It also provides information on market constraints to help clients build successful businesses. The report also addresses key opportunities.

The report delivers the financial details for overall and individual Robotic Nurse Assistant market segments for the year 2022-2029 with projections and expected growth rate in percent. The report examines the value chain activities across different segments of Robotic Nurse Assistant industry. The report analyses the current state of performance of the Robotic Nurse Assistant industry and what will be performed by the global Robotic Nurse Assistant industry by 2029. The report analyzes how the covid-19 pandemic is further impeding the progress of the global Robotic Nurse Assistant industry and highlights some short-term and long-term responses by the global market players that are boosting the market gain momentum. The Robotic Nurse Assistant report presents new growth rate estimates and growth forecasts for the period.

Key Questions Answered in Global Robotic Nurse Assistant Market Report:

Get Special Discount:

https://www.a2zmarketresearch.com/discount/266660

This report provides an in-depth and broad understanding of Robotic Nurse Assistant. With accurate data covering all the key features of the current market, the report offers extensive data from key players. An audit of the state of the market is mentioned as accurate historical data for each segment is available during the forecast period. Driving forces, restraints, and opportunities are provided to help provide an improved picture of this market investment during the forecast period 2022-2029.

Some essential purposes of the Robotic Nurse Assistant market research report:

oVital Developments: Custom investigation provides the critical improvements of the Robotic Nurse Assistant market, including R&D, new item shipment, coordinated efforts, development rate, partnerships, joint efforts, and local development of rivals working in the market on a global scale and regional.

oMarket Characteristics:The report contains Robotic Nurse Assistant market highlights, income, limit, limit utilization rate, value, net, creation rate, generation, utilization, import, trade, supply, demand, cost, part of the industry in general, CAGR and gross margin. Likewise, the market report offers an exhaustive investigation of the elements and their most recent patterns, along with Service market fragments and subsections.

oInvestigative Tools:This market report incorporates the accurately considered and evaluated information of the major established players and their extension into the Robotic Nurse Assistant market by methods. Systematic tools and methodologies, for example, Porters Five Powers Investigation, Possibilities Study, and numerous other statistical investigation methods have been used to analyze the development of the key players working in the Robotic Nurse Assistant market.

oConvincingly, the Robotic Nurse Assistant report will give you an unmistakable perspective on every single market reality without the need to allude to some other research report or source of information. This report will provide all of you with the realities about the past, present, and eventual fate of the Service market.

Buy Exclusive Report: https://www.a2zmarketresearch.com/checkout

Contact Us:

Roger Smith

1887 WHITNEY MESA DR HENDERSON, NV 89014

[emailprotected]

+1 775 237 4147

Here is the original post:

Robotic Nurse Assistant Market Scope and overview, To Develop with Increased Global Emphasis on Industrialization 2029 | Hstar Technologies, Diligent...

The 2021-22 Robotics team. From left: Grady Burns, Henry Maddox, Ryan Naylor, coach Susan Levesque, Ryan Sullivan, Connor Parson, Joseph Levesque, Owen Dyer, Jake Shaw, Austin Levesque, Jackson Ross, and C.J. Colomb. (Courtesy photo)

Twelve members of the Lincoln Academy Robotics team traveled to the VEX Robotics World Championships in Dallas, Texas last week. At the tournament, they competed with their state runner-up robot, 8030A, in the 2021-22 VEX Robotics Competition challenge, which involved building and programming a robot to place rings on goals and balance robots, rings, and goals on a platform.

The World Championships included approximately 800 teams who traveled from all 50 states and 40 countries around the world. The teams were divided into 10 divisions, and most of the competition took place within those divisions. LAs team competed in 10 matches, and of those they won five and lost five, placing them in the middle of the pack in their division and the competition overall.

I was happy with how we did, said senior Owen Dyer, a team captain who led the construction of robot 8030A. Being able to compete at that level, and seeing what the best teams in the world had to offer their strategies and what they did with their robots was really cool to see. There was a team who had a coach who was a VP at Google, a team coached by one of the founders of VEX robotics, and then us, and other small schools from all over.

Dyer plans to study engineering at Embry Riddle College in Arizona, where he hopes to participate in collegiate robotics.

Each year the VEX competition challenge is similar for middle school, high school, and collegiate levels, according to Dyer, but colleges can have bigger robots and fewer restraints, and they compete one on one instead of as an alliance.

In Dallas, the team stayed at the Embassy Suites Hotel and spent their days at the Kay Bailey Hutchinson Convention Center. LA Robotics instructor and coach Sue Levesque and math teacher Shelly Richardson traveled with the team.

This was an incredible educational experience for everyone involved, said Levesque. To see students from all over the country and the world solving the same creative challenge in so many different ways was eye opening for all of us. We will be a better team for having seen the bigger world of robotics that is out there.

One of the highlights of the trip, according to Dyer and Levesque, was the final competition, which took place in a huge auditorium with a high tech light show. The LA team also enjoyed watching their Maine State Championships alliance partner, Thornton Academy, progress to their division finals.

Major donors who made the trip possible included the Lincoln Academy Boosters, Masters Machine Co., Washburn and Doughty Associates, Sabre Yachts & Back Cove Yachts, and The Burns Family Foundation, as well as families of team members and other local supporters.

What is the future for Robot 8030A? It will be taken apart and repurposed for next year, said Dyer.

Next years VEX Robotics challenge, which was announced at the end of the World Championships event, uses the principles of disc golf, where robots will toss or place discs into baskets.

Read more:

LA Robotics Competes at VEX World Championships - The Lincoln County News

Astronaut Kayla Barron, posing with astronauts (from left) Samantha Cristoforetti, and Jessica Watkins, is pictured in her SpaceX flight suit before departing for Earth on May 5.

Robotics and human research were the dominant research themes aboard the International Space Station on Monday. The Expedition 67 crew also began the workweek maintaining a variety of exercise equipment and life support gear aboard the orbiting lab.

NASA Flight Engineer Kjell Lindgren turned on the Astrobee robotic free-flyers and let them roam around inside the Kibo laboratory module on Monday. The cube-shaped devices, powered by fans and programmed using algorithms, photographed imagery of Kibos racks and systems to demonstrate their ability to autonomously monitor and maintain spacecraft systems. Lindgren also tended to the XROOTS space botany study before tightening gas connections on the Combustion Integrated Rack.

NASA Flight Engineer Jessica Watkins wore the Bio-Monitors vest and headband today testing its ability to monitor crew health without interfering with crew activities. Watkins also assisted NASA astronaut Bob Hines who began the six-month maintenance and inspection tasks on the COLBERT treadmill located in the Tranquility module.

ESA (European Space Agency) astronaut Samantha Cristoforetti spent Monday testing the rHEALTH ONE medical device demonstrating its ability to identify cells, microorganisms, and proteins in microgravity. She also shared photographs of the lunar eclipse from the station as it orbited above the Pacific Ocean northeast of New Zealand.

Station Commander Oleg Artemyev joined Flight Engineer Denis Matveev on Monday on ventilation systems and radiation detection tasks in the orbiting labs Russian segment. Roscosmos Flight Engineer Sergey Korsakov started his day exploring future planetary piloting techniques before servicing a Russian oxygen generator.

The space station is orbiting higher after the ISS Progress 79 cargo craft fired its engines on Saturday afternoon. The orbital reboost places the station at the correct altitude for Russias next cargo craft, the ISS Progress 81, slated to launches on June 3 and docks to the Zvezda service modules rear port about three-and-a-half hours later.

NASA and Boeing are still proceeding toward the launch of the uncrewed Orbital Flight Test-2 mission at 6:54 p.m. EDT on Thursday. Boeings Starliner crew ship is targeted to dock to the Harmony modules forward port about 24 hours later where it will stay for up to 10 days of cargo and test operations.

Learn more about station activities by following thespace station blog,@space_stationand@ISS_Researchon Twitter, as well as theISS FacebookandISS Instagramaccounts.

Get weekly video highlights at:http://jscfeatures.jsc.nasa.gov/videoupdate/

Get the latest from NASA delivered every week. Subscribe here:www.nasa.gov/subscribe

See original here:

Advanced Robotics, Life Science Today; Station Boosts Orbit for New Missions - NASA (.gov)

We are excited to bring Transform 2022 back in-person July 19 and virtually July 20 - 28. Join AI and data leaders for insightful talks and exciting networking opportunities. Register today!

Over the past few years, smart manufacturing initiatives such as digital twins and the internet of things (IoT) has caused Industry 4.0 the trend toward digital transformation in manufacturing and industrial sectors to explode. However, robots and drones tasked with visually inspecting machines havent yet seen the same growth.That is set to change in a big way, Bill Ray, vice president and analyst, emerging technologies and trends at Gartner, told VentureBeat.

The robots, drones and cameras that inspect machines to perform predictive maintenance and relay analog information to operations staff can now function autonomously. Even better the longer theyre at their jobs, the better they do.

AI and machine learning tools bestow moving inspection systems that is, robots and drones with the capability to read the analog output from industrial machines that havent been digitized. In this way, they act as a bridge between Industry 4.0 and the analog age it will replace.

With cognitive intelligence, Ray said, robots and drones can make proactive decisions. And, he added, this is still early days. We expect it to be standard for Industry 4.0 in the next five years, Ray said.

In fact, Gartner expects asset inspection and human augmentation (helping out human inspectors) to be the fastest growing use of robotics. The inspection robots market size reached $940 million in 2020, according to a report from Allied Market Research. The report predicts the industry will grow at 31 percent to reach $1.4 billion by 2030.

Rays words underscore todays announcement from Florida-based Levatas that it has raised $5.5 million in a seed round led by Castellan Group. The company provides cognitive intelligence for automating industrial inspection equipment. It does not make robots, drones or vision systems. Instead, it partners with those makers to instill equipment with cognitive intelligence, said Chris Nielsen, CEO of Levatas.

The Levatas software guides these autonomous systems to learn how to do the everyday, mundane operational tasks that keep manufacturers running. For example, they learn to read gauges and to inspect and report abnormal temperature changes. Over time, through the use of machine learning, cognitive machines get better and better at their jobs.

The company competes with other makers of robotic cognitive intelligence systems for a piece of the growing industry. Levatas boasts annual revenues at around $21 million. Competitors include makers of robotics inspection systems for smaller businesses, including Stradigi AI, ReadSense, MotionCloud and Visenze.

Levatas also competes with companies that have a much larger share of the smart robotics inspection sector, said Ray, including Karsh Hagan, with annual revenues of about $19 million and industry giant Profero, which returns annual revenues around $132 million.

This summer, the company plans to roll out a new feature: change detection. Inspection systems will be able to report negative changes in the plant environment, such as a missing fire extinguisher, Nielsen said.

The Levatas system results in higher efficiencies, more uptime, safer workplaces and measurable ROI, Nielsen added: We sit at the heart of Industry 4.0, at the intersection of advanced robotics and inspection systems.

Levatas-trained robots, drones and vision systems are already in place at automakers, oil refineries, energy producers and a large U.S. brewery.

That is precisely the kind of growth Ray expects to see in the future for cognitive intelligence. It has the potential to take inspection and other plant operations to a different level.

You can imagine a robot inspecting the outside of a building and it sees a wet patch, he explained. Maybe AI will highlight the patch, but the drone knows it needs to fly in closer and maybe change the angle to see the patch. These proactive decisions, he explained, totally changes the inspection mission.

This kind of feedback can be folded into Industry 4.0, which will digitize the entire factory floor, using data returned by everything from sensors to conveyor belts to optimize plant performance. But many factories havent digitized every last machine. Upgrades like that would be way too costly especially when analog machines still work fine and would mean significant downtime.

That was true for Global Foundries, one of the worlds leading semiconductor manufacturers, which uses Boston Dynamics Spot robots to improve manufacturing efficiency with help from Levatas.

Global Foundries has around 2000 filter pumps that would cost millions to upgrade to digital sensors. The company put a roving robot on the job with mobile sensors to spot pump malfunctions that, if left unattended, could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in repairs and downtimes.

As Industry 4.0 advances, these analog-reading robots like Spot wont be pushed out of their jobs. Organizations will simply find other ways to put their cognitive intelligence to work, Ray said.

VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative enterprise technology and transact. Learn more about membership.

See original here:

How AI-driven robots and drones bring cognitive intelligence to Industry 4.0 - VentureBeat

Dublin, May 17, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Global Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market 2021-2031" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

A recent market study on the medical rehabilitation robotics market offers a global industry analysis for 2016-2020 and an opportunity assessment for 2021-2031.

The report consists of a comprehensive assessment of the most important market dynamics. On conducting thorough research on the historical as well as current growth parameters of the medical rehabilitation robotics market, growth prospects of the market are obtained with maximum precision.

The report features unique and salient factors that may make a huge impact on the development of the medical rehabilitation robotics market during the forecast period. It can help market players modify their manufacturing and marketing strategies to envisage maximum growth in this market in the coming years.

The report provides detailed information about the current and future growth prospects of medical rehabilitation robotics market in the most comprehensive way for better understanding of readers.

Key Segments of Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market

This study on the medical rehabilitation robotics market offers information divided into seven important segments - product, therapy type, extremity, patient type, application, end user and region. This report offers comprehensive data and information about the important market dynamics and growth parameters associated with these categories.

Product

Application

End User

Region

Key Topics Covered:

1. Executive Summary

2. Market Overview2.1. Market Coverage / Taxonomy2.2. Market Definition / Scope / Limitations

3. Key Market Trends3.1. Key Trends Impacting the Market 3.2. Product Innovation / Development Trends

4. Key Success Factors4.1. Technology Assessment4.2. Strategic Promotional Strategies4.3. Recent product Launches4.4. Regulatory Landscape 4.5. Reimbursement Outlook4.6. Supply Chain Analysis

5. Market Background and Foundation Data points5.1. Macro-Economic Factors5.1.1. Key Facts and Prevalence5.1.2. Global GDP Growth Outlook5.1.3. Global Healthcare Expenditure Outlook5.1.4. Per-Capita Healthcare Expenditure5.1.5. Medical Robot Market- Parent Analysis5.2. Forecast Factors - Relevance & Impact5.2.1. Rising Prevalence of Neurological Disorders and Traumatic Brain Injuries 5.2.2. Growing Technological Advancements and Increasing demand for Rehabilitation Robots to support market growth5.2.3. Aging Population and increase in cases of stroke to drive market growth5.2.4. Integration into Developmentally Informative Research Designs to Increase Ease of Use in Neurodevelopmental Populations5.3. Market Dynamics5.3.1. Drivers5.3.2. Restraints5.3.3. Opportunity

6. COVID19 Crisis Analysis6.1. Current COVID19 Statistics and Probable Future Impact6.2. Current GDP Projection and Probable Impact6.3. Current Economic Projection as compared to 2008 financial analysis6.4. COVID19 and Impact Analysis6.5. 2020 Market Scenario

7. Global Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market Demand (in Value or Size in US$ Mn) Analysis 2016 - 2020 and Forecast, 2021 - 20317.1. Historical Market Value (US$ Mn) Analysis, 2016 - 20207.2. Current and Future Market Value (US$ Mn) Projections, 2021 - 20317.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis7.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis

8. Global Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market - Pricing Analysis8.1. Regional Pricing Analysis By Product Type8.2. Global Average Pricing Analysis Benchmark

9. Global Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market Demand (in Volume or in Units) Analysis 2016 - 2020 and Forecast, 2021 - 20319.1. Historical Market Volume (in Units) Analysis, 2016 - 20209.2. Current and Future Market Volume (in Units) Projections, 2021 - 20319.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis

10. Global Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market Analysis 2016 - 2020 and Forecast 2021 - 2031, by Product Type 10.1. Introduction / Key Findings10.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) & Volume Analysis By Product Type, 2016 - 202010.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Forecast By Product Type, 2021 - 203110.3.1. Exoskeleton10.3.2. Therapeutic/ Assistive10.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Product Type

11. Global Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market Analysis 2016 - 2020 and Forecast 2021 - 2031, by Extremity 11.1. Introduction / Key Findings11.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis by Extremity, 2016 - 202011.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis and Forecast By Extremity, 2021 - 203111.3.1. Upper extremity11.3.1.1. Arm11.3.1.2. Wrist11.3.1.3. Shoulder11.3.1.4. Elbow11.3.2. Lower extremity 11.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Extremity

12. Global Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market Analysis 2016 - 2020 and Forecast 2021 - 2031, by Therapy Type 12.1. Introduction / Key Findings12.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis by Therapy Type, 2016 - 202012.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis and Forecast By Therapy Type, 2021 - 203112.3.1. Limb mobility12.3.2. Gait12.3.3. Sensory12.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Therapy Type

13. Global Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market Analysis 2016 - 2020 and Forecast 2021 - 2031, by Patient Type 13.1. Introduction / Key Findings13.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis by Patient Type, 2016 - 202013.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis and Forecast By Patient Type, 2021 - 203113.3.1. Adult13.3.2. Paediatric 13.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Patient Type

14. Global Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market Analysis 2016 - 2020 and Forecast 2021 - 2031, by Application 14.1. Introduction / Key Findings14.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis by Application, 2016 - 202014.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis and Forecast By Application, 2021 - 203114.3.1. Neurorehabilitation14.3.2. Physical Rehabilitation14.3.3. Others 14.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Application

15. Global Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market Analysis 2016 - 2020 and Forecast 2021 - 2031, by End User 15.1. Introduction / Key Findings15.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis by End User, 2016 - 202015.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis and Forecast By End User, 2021 - 203115.3.1. Hospitals15.3.2. Wellness Centers15.3.3. Rehabilitation centers15.3.4. Home care15.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By End User

16. Global Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market Analysis 2016 - 2020 and Forecast 2021 - 2031, by Region16.1. Introduction16.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) & Volume Analysis by Region, 2016 - 202016.3. Current Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis and Volume Forecast by Region, 2021 - 203116.3.1. North America16.3.2. Latin America16.3.3. Europe16.3.4. South Asia16.3.5. East Asia16.3.6. Oceania16.3.7. Middle East and Africa (MEA)16.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis by Region

17. North America Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market Analysis 2016 - 2020 and Forecast 2021 - 2031

18. Latin America Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market 2016 - 2020 and Forecast 2021 - 2031

19. Europe Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market 2016 - 2020 and Forecast 2021 - 2031

20. South Asia Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market 2016 - 2020 and Forecast 2021 - 2031

21. East Asia Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market 2016 - 2020 and Forecast 2021 - 2031

22. Oceania Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market 2016 - 2020 and Forecast 2021 - 2031

23. Middle East and Africa Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market 2016 - 2020 and Forecast 2021 - 2031

24. Emerging & Key Countries Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Market Analysis

25. Market Structure Analysis25.1. Market Analysis by Tier of Companies 25.2. Market Share Analysis25.3. Market Presence Analysis25.3.1. Regional footprint of players25.3.2. Product footprint of players25.3.3. Channel footprint of players

26. Competition Analysis26.1. Competition Dashboard26.2. Competition Benchmarking26.3. Competition Deep Dive 26.3.1. Ekso Bionics Holdings Inc.26.3.1.1. Overview & Key Financials26.3.1.2. SWOT Analysis26.3.1.3. Sales Footprint26.3.1.4. Analyst commentary26.3.1.5. Strategy Overview26.3.1.5.1. Marketing Strategy26.3.1.5.2. Product Type Strategy26.3.1.5.3. Channel Strategy26.3.2. AlterG, Inc.26.3.3. Bionik Laboratories Corp.26.3.4. Cyberdyne Inc.26.3.5. ReWalk Robotics26.3.6. Instead Technologies Ltd.26.3.7. Hocoma AG26.3.8. Fourier Intelligence26.3.9. Tyromotion26.3.10. Toyota Motor Corporation26.3.11. BeatBots LLC26.3.12. LEADERS REHAB ROBOT Co. Ltd.

27. Assumptions and Acronyms Used

28. Research Methodology

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/txqu4o

Go here to see the original:

Worldwide Medical Rehabilitation Robotics Industry to 2031 - by Product, Application, End-user and Region - GlobeNewswire

In the second half of 2021 the number of deals relating to robotics decreased by 8.7% from the same period in 2020.

This marks an acceleration in growth from the 25% decrease in deals that occurred in H1 2021 relative to the same period a year earlier.

GlobalDatas deals database looks at mergers, acquisitions and venture capital and private equity investments taking place daily between thousands of companies across the world.

During second half of 2021, deals relating to robotics accounted for 2.9% of all deals taking place in the sector. This represents a decrease from the figure of 3.3% in second half of 2020.

GlobalData's thematic approach to sector activity seeks to group key company information on investments to see which industries are best placed to deal with any issues they may encounter.

These themes, of which robotics is one, are best thought of as "any issue that keeps a CEO awake at night", and by tracking them, it becomes possible to ascertain which companies are leading the way on specific issues and which ones have some work to do.

Read the rest here:

Deals relating to robotics decreased in the tech industry in H2 2021 - Verdict

FIRST Lego League, an international robotics competition, where students build robots to perform tasks, and develop an innovation project to help tackle world issues held a competition at Rothesay Netherwood School. Image submitted.

Students are using LEGO and robotics to solve real-world problems.

FIRST LEGO League teamed with Amazon to tackle challenges involving cargo with a competition held at Rothesay Netherwood School in April.

Julie Letkeman is a homeschool teacher in the Kennebecasis Valley and entered a team in the virtual component of the competition.

Teams were challenged to come up with an idea on how to change something about how cargo is moved.

The kids then come up with a problem, research it, and then develop and design a solution.

Letkeman said their team decided to tackle the issues that delivery drivers face like falls, dog bites, and porch pirates.

The students did research, chatted with airspace and drone specialists, and designed a prototype drone, that the driver could launch safely from their truck, to deliver packages.

In one aspect of the competition, the students had to design, build, and code a robot to interact with a plane.

[They] have it travel to the airplane, lift its arms so it can pull down a lever so that it can unload the plane cargo, back up and go back to base and then go out and do another mission, Letkeman said.

She said interest is growing in the program.

A couple of years ago there were only a couple of teams in New Brunswick. This year it seems like there were five or six first-year teams from school throughout New Brunswick, Letkeman said.

Letkeman would love to see robotics get more attention since STEM learning science, technology, engineering and mathematics has become so important in todays world.

The rest is here:

FIRST LEGO League Teams With Amazon On Robotics Competition - 91.9 The Bend

A team of researchers led by University of Toronto ProfessorTim Barfootis using anew strategy that allows robots toavoid collidingwith people by predicting the future locations of dynamic obstacles in their path.

The project, which is supported byApple Machine Learning, will be presented at the International Conference on Robotics and Automation in Philadelphia at the end of May.

The results from a simulation, which are not yet peer-reviewed,are available on the arXiv preprint service.

The principle of our work is to have a robot predict what people are going to do in the immediate future, saysHugues Thomas, a post-doctoral researcher in Barfoots lab at the U of TInstitute for Aerospace Studies in Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering. This allows the robot to anticipate the movement of people it encounters rather than react once confronted with those obstacles.

To decide where to move, the robot makes use of Spatiotemporal Occupancy Grid Maps (SOGM). These are 3D grid maps maintained in the robots processor, with each 2D grid cell containing predicted information about the activity in that space at a specific time.The robot choses its future actions by processing these maps through existing trajectory-planning algorithms.

Another key tool used by the team is light detection and ranging (lidar), a remote sensing technology similar to radarexcept that it uses light instead of sound. Each pingof the lidar creates a point stored in the robots memory.Previous work by the team has focused on labeling these points based on their dynamic properties. This helps the robot recognize different types of objects within its surroundings.

The teams SOGM network is currently able to recognize four lidar point categories:the ground; permanent fixtures, such as walls; things that are moveable but motionless, such as chairs and tables; and dynamic obstacles, such as people. No human labelling of the data is needed.

With this work, we hope to enable robots to navigate through crowded indoor spaces in a more socially aware manner, says Barfoot. By predicting where people and other objects will go, we can plan paths that anticipate what dynamic elements will do.

In the paper, the team reports successful results from the algorithm carried out in simulation. The next challenge is to show similar performancein real-world settings, wherehuman actions can be difficult to predict. As part of this effort, the team has tested their design on the first floor of U of Ts Myhal Centre for Engineering Innovation & Entrepreneurship, where the robot was able to move past busy students.

When we do experiment in simulation, we have agents that are encoded to a certain behaviourand they will go to a certain point by following the best trajectory to get there, says Thomas. But thats not what people do in real life.

When people move through spaces, they may hurry or stop abruptly to talk to someone else or turn in a completely different direction. To deal with this kind of behaviour,the network employs a machine learning technique known as self-supervised learning.

Self-supervised learning contrasts with other machine-learning techniques, such as reinforced learning, where the algorithm learns to perform a task by maximizing a notion of reward in a trial-and-error manner. While this approach works well for some tasks for example, a computer learning to play a gamesuch as chess or Go it is not ideal for this type of navigation.

With reinforcement learning, you create a black box that makes it difficult to understand the connection between the input what the robot sees and the output, or the robot does, says Thomas. It would also require the robot to fail many times before it learns the right calls, and we didnt want our robot to learn by crashing into people.

By contrast, self-supervised learning is simple and comprehensible, meaning that its easier to see how the robot is making its decisions. This approach is also point-centric rather than object-centric, which means the network has a closer interpretation of the raw sensor data, allowing for multimodal predictions.

Many traditional methods detect people as individual objects and create trajectories for them.But since our model is point-centric, our algorithm does not quantify people as individual objects, but recognizes areas where people should be. And if you have a larger group of people, the area gets bigger, says Thomas.

This research offers a promising direction thatcould have positive implications in areas such as autonomous driving and robot delivery, where an environment is not entirely predictable.

In the future, the team wants to see if they can scale up their network to learn more subtle cues from dynamic elements in a scene.

This will take a lot more training data, says Barfoot. But it should be possible because weve set ourselves up to generate the data in more automatic way: where the robot can gather more data itself while navigating, train better predictive models when not in operationand then use these the next time it navigates a space.

More here:

Researchers design 'socially aware' robots that can anticipate and safely avoid people on the move - University of Toronto

Its a playroom for Boston University students to operate robots on the groundand in the air. Its a brain space to research robots that think. Its a miniaturized city for road testing mini self-driving vehicles. Its an area to work on lifesaving, flexible medical robots that dont require motors or rigid parts.

BU undergraduates and masters students, heretofore largely shut out of the Universitys tight robotics laboratory space, will now be able to explore the robotics world at a new College of Engineering lab. The $8.8 million, 2,000-square-foot Robotics and Autonomous Systems Teaching and Innovation Center (RASTIC), to be sited in the former CVS building at 730 Commonwealth Ave., will open in summer 2023.

It will be funded 50-50 by the University and the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative (MassTech), a public agency supporting the states tech sector. Mike Kennealy, Massachusetts secretary of housing and economic development, announced the grant at a news conference May 4 at the BU Photonics Center, flanked by University and state leaders, including Robert A. Brown, president of BU, and Kenneth Lutchen, dean of ENG.

The new tools were investing in today, Kennealy said, will allow students to design and launch their own R&D projects, and for companies in the region, it will create a neutral space for research thats focused on robotics and autonomous solutions, and work with BU students and faculty to design, prototype, and test new devices. He said the lab will also host kindergarten-through-12th grade students in a tech scholars program.

This is really, really good work, and really important work, he said. This is a fabulous example of that work, and it really is critical to the future of our state in a lot of ways.We have to continue to be among the most innovative places in the world.

Brown called the lab a perfect illustration of what happens when this kind of force of imaginative leadership in academia and industry meet together with a state that has got the vision and foresight to support the kind of innovation that were doing. He quipped that Kennealy, who once worked in private equity, knows something about placing bets, which hes now doing today.

MassTech has awarded about 10 such grants among a field of 26 applicants, said Pat Larkin, director of MassTechs grant-making Innovation Institute. RASTIC clearly rose to the top, he said, andwe felt, scored on many of the metrics that are important to us.

With RASTIC, BU will more than quadruple its masters degree students in robotics, Larkin said, boosting Massachusetts competitiveness with rivals from Silicon Valley to China: We have a real appetite to address the talent challenges that exist in this state that are critical to the future of our tech and innovation economy.The number-one constraint in every emerging sector that we work with in Massachusetts is the human capital to build on the asset that exists.

The students that come out of BU RASTIC we anticipate being the actual innovators of the future, he said. They are going to gain an experience there thats going to inspire new ideas, new innovations, new opportunities for start-ups and new business formation in the state.

The commonwealth has a robust, globally significant robotics sector, Larkin added. And to build capabilities both on the technology side and on the talent side really feeds the flywheel in Massachusetts for robotics.

He said the expectation is that the team at BU will help take the robotics cluster in Massachusetts to the very next level.

Ioannis Paschalidis, an ENG Distinguished Professor of Engineering and of computing and data sciences, drafted the RASTIC proposal that won the grant with Sean Andersson, an ENG professor of mechanical and systems engineering. (Paschalidis directs BUs Center for Information and Systems Engineering, the organizational home of RASTIC.) A lot of robotics research takes place in EPIC, BUs Engineering Product Innovation Center, he says. But we have undergraduate students in electrical engineering and mechanical engineering, [and] there is no capacity there for them or for masters students.

In particular, Paschalidis says, ENGs masters program in robotics and autonomous systems, which has an experiential component, gets roughly 300 applications a year, but can select only about 20. We dont have the capacity to support many of these projects, he says. We need a place where the students can go in, can engage, industry can come in and be affiliated sponsors of specific projects that students at the masters and at the undergraduate level can do.

A student in that program, Nash Elder (ENG23), agrees. He works with folding robots inspired by origami, and having the means to fabricate hardware, access software backed by computing power, and collaborate with other students is an empowering resource, he said.I could see the space really as a central hub for the roboticists of BU.

BU will hire a professor to direct RASTIC, which will also have space for BU researchers with robotics grants to translate their ideas into practical applications. Among the areas researchers and students will test at the new lab, Paschalidis says, are these:

RASTIC builds on a long-standing collaboration between BU and the commonwealth, Larkin said, including the construction in Holyoke, with several other partners, of the Massachusetts Green High Performance Computing Center.

Boston University has been a good partner to the state over many years, he said. The key personnel at BUthey understand the mission of the state. These investments are about growing the economy.Our university infrastructure really represents our comparative advantage as an economy globally.

We dont grow corn. We dont have oil. We have people.

Continue reading here:

BU to Open New Robotics Lab to Foster More Innovators - Boston University

The optimization, integration, automation and management of material goods and data within the four walls of a warehouse or distribution center (DC), intralogistics has been getting a lot of attention lately due to the ongoing impacts of the pandemic, the growing labor shortage, the uptick in e-commerce orders and ever-evolving consumer preferences.

The exhibition hall at the recent Modex trade show, one of the leading materials handling events in the world, brought the current state of warehouse robotics and automation into clear focus, all under one roof. There, hundreds of vendors from all corners of the materials handling world were showcasing their innovations, most of which were in some wayeither directly or indirectlyrelated to automation and robotics.

Are you currently using or consideringother types of large-scale intralogisticsautomation like conveyors, sortation,storage/retrieval, or shuttle systems?

Source: Peerless Research Group

The long line of attendees waiting to get onto that floor each morning of the four-day event further proved just how hungry logistics operations are for equipment, software, devices and tools that help them get more done with less.

Once inside the exhibition hall, those attendees visited spacious booths outfitted with the newest warehouse robotics; watched robots effectively take on the heavy lifting involved with picking and packing orders; and saw how robotics developers and container manufacturers are collaborating to make combined solutions that work in perfect harmony.

What best describes your organizationsuse of robotic automation systemsand/or autonomous mobile robotsin your warehouses, distribution centers and/or manufacturing operations?

Source: Peerless Research Group

With the global robotics market on track to grow to $45.5 million this yearand with 80% of current fulfillment centers lacking any type of automationcompanies across all industries are experimenting with and implementing robotics in their warehouses, DCs and fulfillment centers. Supporting this trend is a vendor base thats optimizing advanced technology and using it to develop newer, better and more useful machines that meet their own customers needs.

Mobility underpins increased robotics usefulness, as contemporary robots are equipped with sensors such as light detection and ranging [Lidar] sensors and computer vision to help them autonomously navigate their environments, PitchBook, a capital market company, points out in its recent robotics report. This new ability, combined with labor shortages, geopolitical concerns, and productivity-obsessed shareholders, has many companies looking to robots to accelerate their business competitiveness.

What is the current state of yourorganizations pursuit of robots systemsin your warehouse or DCs?

Source: Peerless Research Group

To learn more about current and future intralogistics robotics and automation implementation trendsincluding readiness for adoption, barriers to adoption, and the key criteria shippers are using when buying such equipmentPeerless Research Group (PRG) recently conducted its new Intralogistics Robotics Study in March of 2022. Heres what we learned.

Which of the following use cases would beyour top 3 priorities for using robots today?

Source: Peerless Research Group

More than 300Logistics ManagementandModern Materials Handlingreaders provided input for the online survey, which was largely focused on the current state of robotics automation adoption and use cases.

Responsible for hiring, interviewing or sourcing full-time or part-time labor to manage materials handling, distribution and fulfillment, the survey respondents work in manufacturing (41.8%); transportation and warehousing services (15.3%); wholesale trade (10.2%); and retail trade (8.2%) industries.

The key industry sectors represented for this survey include fabricated metals, industrial machinery, and plastics andrubber. The majority of companies (38.8%) have annual revenues of less than $50 million, while 11.2% have somewhere between $100 million to $249.9 million in revenues and another 9.2% reported revenues of $2.5 billion or more.

What is your preferred commercial modelfor your planned robotics initiatives?

Source: Peerless Research Group

Many companies are just beginning their warehouse robotics journeys, according to the survey. In fact, we found that 40.4% have yet to install any robotic automation systems or services. About 34% of respondents consider themselves potential buyers or current users of these solutions, while 15.2% provide robotic automation consulting and systems integration services and 7.3% sell robotic automation systems or services.

Currently, 37% of companies are using large-scale intralogistics automation (e.g., conveyors, sortation, storage/retrieval, or shuttle systems) in their operations, and 23.1% are using robots in their plants or warehouses. Just over half of the responding organizations (52.8%) are not using this type of equipment, but 21.3% plan to put it to use within the next three years.

How important are the following business case factorswhen you are choosing your robotics solutions?

Source: Peerless Research Group

About 40% of survey respondents still say that they have no plans to use robots at this time.

When asked for their top reasons fornotinvesting in robotics, respondents said they were going to focus their time and investments in warehousing and storage; order customization; inventory management; and individual pick, pack and ship. Other obstacles include a lack of management support, too many variables in products, space and cost constraints and inventory fluctuations.

What is the current state of your organizations pursuitof robots in your warehouse or DCs?

Source: Peerless Research Group

Of the survey respondents who plan to use robots, but dont currently have them in place, 38% of respondents are in the education and knowledge gathering stage; 22% are in the strategy and vision formulation stage; and 12% plan to roll out additional robots based on previous, successful tests. Other respondents are conducting an impact analysis (8%), documenting requirements (4%), piloting (2%), or already implementing robots in the liveproduction environment (2%).

The companies that are implementing robotics and automation are focused on increasing flow and throughput, better managing the labor crisis, improving current labor productivity, reducing labor costs, improving workplace safety, reducing injuries and improving order accuracy and quality.

When selecting and implementing advanced robotics automation to fulfill those needs, most companies turn to material handling suppliers, robotics vendors, industry peers or systems integrators for help.

According to respondents who are planning to implement robotics automation, their top priorities for using such technology include picking (42.9%), goods receiving and unloading (42.9%) and sorting (37.5%). About 43% of companies are considering AMR pallet movement equipment while 34% want autonomous retrieval-to-person/put-wall robots, and 30.2% are evaluating robotic picking systems.

Which use cases are you addressing with robots today?

Source: Peerless Research Group

Around 28% of respondents want to incorporate heavy payload forked/tugger transport robots into their operations, while 24.5% and 22.6% want sortation robots or stationary industrial robots, respectively. Other types of automated equipment that are currently on logistics operations radar screens include heavy payload carry-on-top transport robots, case/tote transport robots, collaborative in-aisle picking robots and cleaning robots.

When choosing a robotics solution, 48% of companies say ROI is extremely important to their decision making, while 40% see payback time as extremely important and 38% point to total cost of ownership as a key aspect of their decision-making process. Additionally, 28% consider time to value when choosing a solution, and 26% consider investment risk extremely important.

Of those companies planning to implement a robotics solution, 32% have yet to secure the funding for these projects, but are working on it, while 24% do have the funding in place. About 10% of respondents say that pre-funding is unnecessary because they plan to use robots as a service (RaaS) and another 2% say they plan to funnel funds from other projects into their robotics and automation initiatives.

Nearly half of the survey respondents who are planning to use robotics would prefer to buy the entire robotic solution (i.e., a pure Capex investment); 24% say they would rather use the RaaS option; and 22% say they would prefer to buy the robot hardware but subscribe to the software via a hybrid approach.

When investing in robotics solutions, more than half of respondents (53.8%) say payback is an extremely important factor in the decision, while an equal number consider return on investment (ROI) when making these decisions. Others point to time to value (38.5%), total cost of ownership (38.5%), and investment risk (30.8%) as some of the most important considerations when investing in robotics and automation.

Robots are living up to expectations in the real-world applications where theyre being put to work. Asked whether their existing robotics installations lived up to early expectations, over 60% of companies say their total-cost-of-ownership objectives were either met or exceeded. Nearly 85% of respondents say that the projected ROI either met or exceeded their expectations, and almost 77% say the same about their payback time objectives.

Overall, the majority of companies are satisfied with their robotics and automation investments, with 69.2% of them reportedly achieving their overall business goals from their robotics implementations, 23.1% saying theyve yet to achieve those goals and 7.7% unsure of the answer to that question.

Did you achieve your overall business goalsfrom your robotics investment?

Source: Peerless Research Group

Organizations are enthusiastic about future use cases for robotic automation. Nearly all of those with robotics systems currently in place say they have plans for future projects, while 46.2% say theyre already in the middle of new projects. Just over 46% will pursue new use cases over the next two years (with the planning process already underway), while 7.7% have no plans to implement robotics in their intralogistics operations.

When planning out future robotics projects, about 77% of respondents say picking is their top priority, while 46.2% point to sorting, 38.5% to case/tote transport, and 30.8% to replenishment as their key priorities. Other companies want to add more robotics into their goods receiving and unloading processes (30.8%); put-away into storage automation (15.4%); packing (7.7%); and order consolidation (7.7%).

Looking ahead, 61.5% of survey respondents will likely consider mobile goods-to-person systems within the next two to five years, while 53.8% point to robotic picking systems and 46.2% to sortation robots as their key future priorities. About 39% of respondents have set their sights on autonomous retrieval-to-person/put-wall robots, 30.8% want stationary industrial robots and 30.8% will be considering heavy payload carry-on-top transport robots.

Link:

2022 Robotics Survey: The logistics robots have arrived - Logistics Management